Aims. A national screening programme has existed in the UK for the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) since 1969. However, every aspect of screening and treatment remains controversial. Screening programmes throughout the world vary enormously, and in the UK there is significant variation in screening practice and treatment pathways. We report the results of an attempt by the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) to identify a nationwide consensus for the management of DDH in order to unify treatment and suggest an approach for screening. Methods. A Delphi consensus study was performed among the membership of BSCOS. Statements were generated by a steering group regarding aspects of the management of DDH in children aged under three months, namely screening and surveillance (15 questions), the technique of ultrasound scanning (eight questions), the initiation of treatment (19 questions), care during treatment with a splint (ten questions), and on quality, governance, and research (eight questions). A two-round Delphi process was used and a consensus document was produced at the final meeting of the steering group. Results. A total of 60 statements were graded by 128 clinicians in the first round and 132 in the second round. Consensus was reached on 30 out of 60 statements in the first round and an additional 12 in the seond. This was summarized in a consensus statement and distilled into a flowchart to guide clinical practice. Conclusion. We identified agreement in an area of medicine that has a long history of controversy and varied practice. None of the areas of consensus are based on high-quality evidence. This document is thus a framework to guide clinical practice and on which high-quality clinical trials can be developed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):209–214

Aims. The aim of this study was to gain a consensus for best practice of the assessment and management of children with idiopathic toe walking (ITW) in order to provide a benchmark for practitioners and guide the best consistent care. Methods. An established Delphi approach with predetermined steps and degree of agreement based on a standardized protocol was used to determine consensus. The steering group members and Delphi survey participants included members from the British Society of Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS) and the Association of Paediatric Chartered Physiotherapists (APCP). The statements included definition, assessment, treatment indications, nonoperative and operative interventions, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis of the Delphi survey results. The AGREE checklist was followed for reporting the results. Results. A total of 227 participants (54% APCP and 46% BSCOS members) completed the first round, and 222 participants (98%) completed the second round. Out of 54 proposed statements included in the first round Delphi, 17 reached ‘consensus in’, no statements reached ‘consensus out’, and 37 reached ‘no consensus’. These 37 statements were then discussed, reworded, amalgamated, or deleted before the second round Delphi of 29 statements. A total of 12 statements reached ‘consensus in’, four ‘consensus out’, and 13 ‘no consensus’. In the final consensus meeting, 13 statements were voted upon. Five were accepted, resulting in a total of 31 approved statements. Conclusion. In the aspects of practice where sufficient evidence is not available, a consensus statement can provide a strong body of opinion that acts as a benchmark for excellence in clinical care. This statement can assist clinicians managing children with ITW to ensure consistent and reliable practice, and reduce geographical variability in practice and outcomes. It will enable those treating ITW to share the published consensus document with both carers and patient groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1190–1196

Aims & Background. Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV) is the most common congenital musculoskeletal birth defect affecting 1 in 1000 births per annum. We have compared our surgical results to the British Society of Children's Orthopaedics (BSCOS) published guidelines. Methods. Between, 2006–16, patients who were referred for treatment of pathological CTEV were audited. Data from a combination of Clinical Portal, Orthotic Patient Administration System and Surgical Elogbook were assessed. In addition, the degree of deformity was classified by the Harrold & Walker method at the time of diagnosis (senior author). Most of this information was recorded prospectively and analysed retrospectively. Ponseti technique was the method of treatment. Results. 96 patients assessed (133 feet). There were 78 males and 18 females, 37 patients were affected bilaterally and 11 had associated syndromes. There were 23 Harrold & Walker (H&W) 1, 28 H&W 2 and 82 H&W 3 classification feet. Average time period in Ponseti boots and bars was 14.4 months (95% CI 12.9–15.9), average time in all types of bracing of was 17.1 months (95% CI 14.8–14.8). Number and rate of surgeries performed were as follows: 77 Tendoachilles release (63.1%), 19 Tibialis Anterior Transfer (5.6%), 15 Radical Release (12.3%), revision 25 Surgery (20.5%) & 5 Abductor Hallucis Release (4.1%). Conclusion. The audit confirms that the unit meets most of the current BSCOS guidelines. All surgical procedures apart from radical release surgery fall within accepted limits. This may be due, in part, to the syndromal cases. We do however demonstrate a significantly reduced average time period in bracing compared to that recommended by BSCOS. There are multiple reasons for this discrepancy including non-compliance and poor splint tolerance (child refusing to use). We feel this work demonstrates a reduced period in bracing can be achieved whilst maintaining standards of treatment

Purpose of the study. To determine the consistency with which specialist orthopaedic surgeons rate the importance of criteria for the diagnosis of DDH which had previously been generated in a BSCOS and EPOS multi national study. Methods. 163 members of BSCOS received a questionnaire containing 37 criteria that, in a previous study, had been found to be important for the diagnosis of DDH in infants under 8 weeks. A visual analogue scale was used to rate the importance of each criterion in the diagnosis of DDH. We determined the consistency using the intra-class correlation coefficient (values > .80 are anticipated). Analyses were preformed for all members of BSCOS and for geographic regions. Results. The response rate was 61%. Cronbach's α was .98 indicating that the pattern of the data observed was stable. The overall consistency was poor for all 37 criteria (ICC = .39 [95% CI .29, .52]). Surgeons were least consistent about criteria related to ultrasound (ICC = .25). The consistency for criteria related to patient characteristics (ICC = .40) and x-ray (ICC= .32) was better. Surgeons were most consistent (ICC = .51) about criteria related to clinical examination. Analyses based on regions of England, Scotland and Wales improved consistency by 25% (best ICC = .47) with West Midland, Yorkshire and Scotland rating top three. Conclusion. Surgeons' opinion about the importance of criteria for the diagnosis of DDH varies substantially across the UK. This study suggests a need to develop widely accepted criteria for the diagnosis of DDH that can be applied with sufficient degree of consistency among surgeons. Reducing inconsistency in this area should improve diagnosis and treatment

The aim was to assess contemporary management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by surveying members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). A questionnaire with 5 case vignettes was used. Two questions examined the timing of surgery for an acute unstable SCFE in a child presenting at 6 hours and at 48 hours after start of symptoms. Two further questions explored the preferred method of fixation in mild and severe stable SCFE. The final question examined the management of the contralateral normal hip. Responses were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and the data w analysed using a chi-squared test. The response rate was 56% (110/196). 88.2% (97/110) responded that if a child presented with an acute unstable SCFE within 6 hours, they would treat it within 24 hours of presentation, compared with 40.9% (45/110) for one presenting 48 hours after the onset of symptoms (P<0.0001). 52.6% (58/110) of surveyed BSCOS members would offer surgery for an unstable SCFE between 1 and 7 days after onset of symptoms. Single screw fixation in situ was advocated by 96.4% (106/110) and 70.9% (78/110) while corrective osteotomy was preferred by 1.8% (2/110) and 26.4% (29/110) of respondents for the mild and the severe stable slips respectively (P<0.0001). Surgeons preferring osteotomy are more likely to perform an intracapsular technique. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral normal hip was performed by 27.3% (30/110) of participants. There are significant differences in opinions between BSCOS members as to the optimal management of SCFE in children. This reflects the variable recommendations and quality in the current scientific literature. Further research is therefore required to determine best practice and enable consensus to be reached

In 2017, the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery engaged the profession and all relevant stakeholders in two formal research prioritization processes. In this editorial, we describe the impact of this prioritization on funding, and how research in children’s orthopaedics, which was until very recently a largely unfunded and under-investigated area, is now flourishing. Establishing research priorities was a crucial step in this process.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):422–424.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the consensus best practice approach for the investigation and management of children (aged 0 to 15 years) in the UK with musculoskeletal infection (including septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, pyomyositis, tenosynovitis, fasciitis, and discitis). This consensus can then be used to ensure consistent, safe care for children in UK hospitals and those elsewhere with similar healthcare systems.

Aims

The aim of this study was to gain an agreement on the management of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) up to walking age in order to provide a benchmark for practitioners and guide consistent, high-quality care for children with CTEV.

Aims

The Ponseti method is the gold standard treatment for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), with the British Consensus Statement providing a benchmark for standard of care. Meeting these standards and providing expert care while maintaining geographical accessibility can pose a service delivery challenge. A novel ‘Hub and Spoke’ Shared Care model was initiated to deliver Ponseti treatment for CTEV, while addressing standard of care and resource allocation. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and outcomes of the corrective phase of Ponseti service delivery using this model.

Aim. Differing reports about the surgical management of the supracondylar humeral fracture make evidence-based practice very difficult, so knowledge of the contemporary practices and opinions of an expert body can provide a useful benchmark for appraisal; the aim of this study was to obtain this information. Methods. An electronic 18 item, single response multiple-choice questionnaire was designed to investigate various aspects of the surgical management of supracondylar fractures, with particular focus on areas that remain controversial in the literature. Members of BSCOS were invited by email, on three occasions, to complete the questionnaire, which was posted on the web-based SurveyMonkey™ platform (. www.surveymonkey.com. , California, USA). The survey was available for completion for a period of 10 weeks. Results. 102 responses were received (response rate 56.7%); all respondents completed the entire questionnaire. There was almost complete agreement (>90%) in only three areas: -The preferred management of Gartland 3 fractures; The management of the fracture with an absent radial pulse and impaired digital perfusion; An ulnar nerve palsy detected four weeks post-operatively. Majority agreement (>60%) was found regarding: - Possible consequences of delay in performing closed reduction; Management of the pink, perfused hand with an absent radial pulse; Necessity of anatomical reduction. There was no consensus regarding: - K-wiring of Gartland 2 fractures; Management of ulnar nerve palsy detected one week post-operatively; Open insertion of the medial K-wire. Conclusion. Reflecting current trends and attitudes, this survey provides information against which an individual surgeon can appraise their own practice. Strong consensus existed in areas in which clear evidence is available to inform practice. This highlights the importance of good-quality research, and identifies areas requiring further investigation

Purpose of study: To compare our practice of paediatric foot and ankle surgery with other hospitals in the UK and to assess the safety and patient satisfaction of day-case procedures on an afternoon list. Methods and Results: A postal questionnaire was sent to 135 consultant members of BSCOS to identify which foot and ankle operations were being performed as inpatients (“Major surgery”) and day-cases (“Minor surgery”). We received 87 (64%) replies over 3 months. The survey revealed that certain procedures were being performed as a day-case in fewer than 35% of centres in the UK. These included excision of tarsal coalitions, tendon transfers, metatarsal osteotomies and open posterior releases for equinus. These same procedures are performed routinely as day-cases at Birmingham Children’s Hospital. We focussed on a single surgeon series with a once weekly afternoon operating list. We identified 24 “major operations” on 19 patients that were performed as a day case over 21 months. The parents of each patient were contacted by telephone to complete a satisfaction survey. We demonstrate that there were no problems that should have warranted an inpatient stay. Conclusions: Most paediatric foot and ankle surgery can be performed satisfactorily as a day case which has obvious cost implications for the NHS. Although this is an accepted practice among adults, the majority of paediatric orthopaedic units are yet to accept this protocol

Salter-Harris II fractures of the distal tibia affect children frequently, and when they are displaced present a treatment dilemma. Treatment primarily aims to restore alignment and prevent premature physeal closure, as this can lead to angular deformity, limb length difference, or both. Current literature is of poor methodological quality and is contradictory as to whether conservative or surgical management is superior in avoiding complications and adverse outcomes. A state of clinical equipoise exists regarding whether displaced distal tibial Salter-Harris II fractures in children should be treated with surgery to achieve anatomical reduction, or whether cast treatment alone will lead to a satisfactory outcome. Systematic review and meta-analysis has concluded that high-quality prospective multicentre research is needed to answer this question. The Outcomes of Displaced Distal tibial fractures: Surgery Or Casts in KidS (ODD SOCKS) trial, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, aims to provide this high-quality research in order to answer this question, which has been identified as a top-five research priority by the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(5):471–473.

Purpose of study: Osteonecrosis is a potentially devastating condition which requires early diagnosis before articular collapse occurs. We have become aware of an increase in the number of childhood cancer survivors presenting to us with osteonecrosis. This is recognised in the literature among leukaemia survivors, particularly those treated in adolescence. In the majority of cases the hips have been affected, but shoulders, knees and ankles also appear susceptible. The presentation to orthopaedics is often late with subchondral fracture or collapse of the articular surface, which precludes any salvage of the joint. We wished to assess the extent of the problem throughout Britain. Method: A postal questionnaire was sent to all BSCOS members. Members were asked to note their unit’s experience of childhood cancer survivors with osteonecrosis, current management strategies and if they were willing to participate in a detailed national survey of cases. Results: 58% of respondents work in units where children with childhood cancer are treated. 37% of respondents, or their colleagues, had seen survivors of childhood cancer with osteonecrosis in the last twelve months. Most units had seen less than 5 cases per year. Of the respondents who had treated cases of osteonecrosis (n =30), management included restricted weight-bearing (29), core decompression (9) and bisphosphonates (6). Other treatment modalities used were joint distraction (2), fibular grafting (2), bone marrow injection (1), fusion (1) and arthroplasty (4). Conclusions: We have shown that a large number of units are each seeing small numbers of cases of osteonecrosis in childhood cancer survivors. The study establishes an estimate of the problem nationally and a network of centres to continue a more detailed analysis of cases

Introduction: It is common practice to screen the hips of infant with a family history of DDH clinically and ultra-sonographically in selective screening programmes. The practice of regular radiographic follow-up of infants with a positive family history of Developmental Hip Dysplasia (DDH) is based on the widespread belief that Primary Acetabular Dysplasia is a genetic disorder that can occur in the absence of frank hip subluxation or dislocation. 1. It has been our practice to obtain a 6 – 12 month screening radiograph in such patients but this practice is not conclusively supported in the literature. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all such infants who had a normal clinical and ultrasound examination of the hips at the 6–8 week screening examination but who, because of the family history underwent further radiographic screening after a 6–12 month interval. The radiographs of all such infants (n=77) were analysed for any signs of late hip dysplasia. Results and Discussion: Sixty six infant had normal X rays at the 6–8 month assessment and were discharged. The remaining eleven patients had acetabular angles at the upper end of the normal range for age and were reviewed again with further radiographs at 12 months. At this stage ten patients were normal and were discharged. The remaining patient was reviewed again at 18 months and 24 months and finally proved to be normal and was discharged. The result of a postal survey has suggested that majority of BSCOS members do not get follow up x-ray done if the clinical and ultrasound scan is normal at screening visit. Conclusion: All of the seventy seven patients eventually developed normal radiographs and we question the need for radiographic follow up of infants with a family history of DDH but who have a normal clinical examination and ultrasound scan at 6–8 weeks

Aims

To determine the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaediatric admissions and fracture clinics within a regional integrated care system (ICS).

Aims

High-quality clinical research in children’s orthopaedic surgery has lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. This study used a consensus-based approach to identify research priorities for clinical trials in children’s orthopaedics.

Aims

Perthes’ disease is a condition leading to necrosis of the femoral head. It is most common in children aged four to nine years, affecting around one per 1,200 children in the UK. Management typically includes non-surgical treatment options, such as physiotherapy with/without surgical intervention. However, there is significant variation in care with no consensus on the most effective treatment option.

Introduction

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapidly implemented restructuring of UK healthcare services. The The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, became a central hub for the provision of trauma services for North Central/East London (NCEL) while providing a musculoskeletal tumour service for the south of England, the Midlands, and Wales and an urgent spinal service for London. This study reviews our paediatric practice over this period in order to share our experience and lessons learned. Our hospital admission pathways are described and the safety of surgical and interventional radiological procedures performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with regards to COVID-19 in a paediatric population are evaluated.