Introduction: Ronald McRae’s textbook clinical orthopaedic examination mentions “Capasso’s method. 1. of evaluation of coronal plane deformity to be the most sensitive tool of measuring cobb angle. However there is no study to date evaluating/comparing this method against popular & widely used tools viz. cobbometer and traditional protractor. Objectives: To evaluate Capasso’s method against commonly used measurement aids w.r.t measurement of cobb angle in scoliosis. Summary of background data: Studies of Cobb method of measurement have multiple sources of error and intra & inter-observer variability. The Capasso’s method which is based on “bi-uni-vocal principle” views the scoliosis curve to be an arc of circumference and to be a true reflection of angular values and hence geometrically more valid. Methods: 24 scoliosis curves were measured by three different examiners on three separate occasions one week apart by 1) Capasso’s method 2) Cobbometer and 3) Traditional protractor on same set of hard copies of digital x-rays. The three set of Cobb angle readings obtained were statistically analysed for intra & inter-observer reliability and assessed for agreement between the three methods of clinical measurement. Results: The mean intra observer variability for protractor, cobbometer & Capasso’s methods were 8.50, 5.50 10.00 respectively. The cobb angle readings obtained by Capas-so’s method was higher than the other two methods for all magnitudes of the curves (< 300, 300–600 & > 600) and was more than two times the conventional readings for curves < 300. The disagreement between Capasso’s method with either of the other two methods (cobbometer & protractor) was statistically significant (p< 0.01). Discussion: This study demonstrates that Capasso’s method significantly overestimates the magnitude of scoliotic deformity esp. for curves < 300 as compared to other existing popular measurement tools. Surgical decision making if were to be based on it would invite criticism and wrath. The present existing methods have their own limitations and the need of the day is a simple three dimensional measuring system to accurately define the magnitude of the deformity

Purpose. This study aims to identify factors that influence the Cobb angle at presentation to a tertiary referral scoliosis centre, and the outcome of the referrals. Methods. 81 consecutive patients referred were reviewed retrospectively. Hospital database, clinic letters and radiographs were examined. Patient demographics, mode of referral (GP vs. tertiary), severity and type of scoliosis were recorded. The season of referral was defined as ‘warm’ between months of June and September, and ‘cold’ between November and March. Cobb angle measurements were made independently on digital radiographs by 2 Orthopaedic trainees. Results. There were 60 females and 21 males referred. Of these patients, 31 (38%) were offered surgery. The overall mean Cobb angle was 43° (SD 22.5°), where the surgical group was 58° (SD 20°) and the non-surgical group was 33° (SD 18°), p < 0.05. The mean age of the patients for surgery was 22, compared to 19 in the non-operative group (p < 0.05). There was no significant influence of sex, season of referral, and mode of referral on operations offered. Males had a higher mean Cobb angle (52°) than female (39°) with marginal significance (p = 0.09). Advancing age correlated with increasing Cobb angle (r = 0.2, p = 0.09) with marginal significance. No other factors influenced the presenting Cobb angle. There was excellent inter-observer agreement in the Cobb angle measurements (α = 0.99). Conclusion. High Cobb angle and age were the only significant predictors for requirement of surgery in a tertiary referral scoliosis centre. Secondary or tertiary referral did not influence the severity or the outcome of patients with scoliosis. This may imply that GP direct referrals to scoliosis centres are sufficient, especially if Cobb angle measurements and age are included in the criteria. Seasonal differences in scoliosis presentation were not found, however further comparison can be made with countries with warmer climate to demonstrate the cosmetic influence. Ethics Approval: none. Interest Statement: none

Introduction: Accurate and quantitative measurements of the spine are essential for deformity diagnosis and assessment of curve progression. There is much concern related to the multiple exposures to ionizing radiation associated with the Cobb method of radiographic measurement, currently the standard procedure for diagnosis and follow-up of the progression of scoliosis. In addition, the Cobb method relies on two-dimensional analysis of a three-dimensional deformity. The Ortelius800TM aims to provide a radiation-free method for scoliosis assessment in three planes (coronal, sagittal, apical) with simultaneous automatic calculation of the Cobb angle in both coronal and sagittal views. This new device is based on direct measurement of the position of the tips of the spinous processes in space. A low intensity electromagnetic field records the spatial position of a sensor attached to the examiner’s finger while palpating the patient’s spinous processes. This study investigates the correlation of spinal deformity measurements with Ortelius800TM radiation-free system as compared to standard radiographic measured Cobb angles in order to assess Ortelius800TM clinical value while enabling a significant reduction of x-ray exposure. Methods: 124 patients diagnosed with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) from four different medical centers were measured with the Ortelius800TM system using the same standard protocol. The entire process required an average of 2 minutes. The Ortelius800TM measurements were correlated with the standard Cobb angle as measured on routine standing coronal and sagittal radiographs. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for matched pair measurements. The mean difference and the absolute mean difference between measurements with the two methods was estimated. Results: Standing full-spine coronal radiographs were obtained for each patient. Radiograph analysis for these 124 patients revealed 249 deformity measurements. The deformity measurements were comprised of 142 thoracic curves with a mean of 18.3° and 107 lumbar curves with a mean of 17.4°. Lateral radiographs were obtained from 38 patients with a mean of 36.1°. Correlation between Cobb angles measured manually on standard erect posteroanterior radiographs and those calculated by this new technique showed an absolute difference between the measurements to be significantly less than +\−5° for coronal measurements and significantly less than +\−6° for sagittal measurements indicating good correlation between the two methods. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between deformity angles obtained by the two methods was highly significant (0.86) with a P value < 0.0001. The measurements from four independent sites were not significantly different. Discussion: The results reveal good correlation between the two measuring methods in both coronal and sagittal views. We propose the Ortelius800TM as a clinical tool for the routine follow-up measurements of AIS patients, thus enabling a significant reduction of radiation exposure

Purpose of the study. To establish the relation between the magnitude of the deformity in scoliosis, measured by cobb angle on radiograph & Volumetric asymmetry with the ISIS2 surface topography, and the patient perception of self image and mental health, measured with SRS-22 scores. Methodology. A total of 89 untreated patients with scoliosis were included in the study. They had clinical assessment, cobb angle measurement of radiograph and surface topography performed on the same day along with SRS-22 questionnaires. The cobb angle was measured by single surgeon using a digital PACS system, who was unaware of the volumetric asymmetry score. Volumetric asymmetry was measured by ISIS2 surface topography performed by a research nurse who was unaware of the cobb angle. Volumetric asymmetry was calculated using standard ISIS2 software. A comparison correlation of SRS scores for function, pain, self image and mental health against cobb angle and volumetric asymmetry was undertaken by clinical scientist. Scores for patient satisfaction to treatment was excluded as these were untreated patients. Statistical analysis was performed using cor. test on software R. Results. Correlation of both cobb angle and volumetric asymmetry for function and pain were statistically not significant (p value > 0.05). However for self image, correlation was statistically significant with cobb angle (p value-0.0033) and volumetric asymmetry (p value-0.00031), but the correlation was not high. Cobb angle contributed only around 10% to self image, whilst volumetric asymmetry contributed only 14%. Similarly for mental health, correlation was statistically significant with cobb angle (p value-0.0194) and volumetric asymmetry (p value-0.00559), but the correlation was not high. Cobb angle contributed only around 6.2% to mental health, whilst volumetric asymmetry contributed only 8.6%. Conclusion. Volumetric asymmetry correlates better to both mental health and self image as compared to cobb angle, but the correlation is still poor. Neither cobb angle or volumetric asymmetry can be used to predict patients self image or mental health. We are pursuing this study further to look at other parameters which may affect SRS-22 such as gender, age, type of deformity, waist asymmetry and shoulder asymmetry. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Objective: Axially loaded MRI simulates imaging of the lumbar spine in the standing position and is useful in the assessment of spinal stenosis[. 1. ]. This study determines the ability of axially loaded spinal MRI to assess Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Design: Prospective study. Newly diagnosed patients with idiopathic scoliosis were referred for MRI of the whole spine. Cobb angle measurements were made from erect AP spinal radiographs prior to MRI. Coronal MR images of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were obtained prior to and following loading of the spine in an MR compatible compression device (Dynawell). Cobb angle measurements were made on unloaded and loaded MRI studies using the same reference points as on radiographs. Radiographic and MRI Cobb angle measurements were compared. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Subjects: Five patients, all females with mean age 14 years (range 12–16 years) were included in the study. Outcome Measures: Six curves were compared on pre-referral erect radiographs, unloaded and loaded MRI studies, 2 in the thoracic region and 4 in the thoracolumbar region. Results: Curve characteristics and Cobb angle measurement on radiographs vs. axial unloaded and loaded MRI were as follows: Curve 1; T4-T12, 45°, 36° and 41°. Curve 2; T10-L4, 52°, 22° and 30°. Curve 3; T10-L4, 45°, 36° and 38°. Curve 4; T6-T10, 42°, 22° and 22°. Curve 5; T11-L3, 43°, 32° and 43°. Curve 6; T11-L3, 34°, 11° and 31°. Conclusions: Axial loading increases MRI Cobb angle measurements compared to unloaded studies. Initial results suggest that axial loaded MRI using the Dynawell Compression device may allow comparative measurement of Cobb angle to erect radiographs in the thoracolumbar region, but not in the thoracic region. This is likely related to the loading characteristics of the compression device, which is designed to concentrate loading in the lumbar region. Modification to include loading of the thoracic spine may improve results. The technique has the potential to replace radiography and thus reduce radiation burden to young adolescents with some types of idiopathic scoliosis

Introduction: Capasso’s method(CM) has been described in orthopaedic textbooks to be the most sensitive tool for measuring Cobb angle in scoliosis. This method based on “bi-univocal principle” views the scoliosis curve to be an arc of circumference, to be a true reflection of angular values and hence geometrically more valid. However there is no comparative study between the established measurement tools i.e. Oxford cobbometer(OC) & Traditional protractor(TP) vs. CM. Our objectives were to to evaluate the sensitivity of CM against OC & TP in scoliosis and to determine intra & inter-observer reliability of the three methods. Methods: Three independent blinded observers measured 24 digital AP radiographs of scoliosis on three separate occasions one week apart by CM, OC & TP. The three sets of readings obtained were statistically analysed for intra-observer (Cronbach’s alpha) & inter-observer [Inter-class correlation coefficient(ICC)] reliability. Results: The mean Cobb angle measured by OC was 42.4(r13-91), by TP was 45.1(r16-89) and by CM was 70.4(r 20-148). The cronbach’s was 0.94 for OC, 0.91 for TP & 0.88 for CM. The ICC was 0.96 for OC, 0.90 for TP & 0.71 for CM. The measurements obtained by CM were higher than the other two methods for all magnitudes of the curves. Conclusion: CM based on sound geometric principles is perceived to be superior to Cobb angle and has reasonable correlation(Pearson’s®=0.74) with it. However CM overestimates the magnitude of scoliosis as compared to other standard measurement tools. Management decisions based on CM would be inappropriate by current guidelines. Ethics approval: Not applicable Interest Statement: None

The purpose of this study was to establish the a)feasibility, b) reproducibility of spinal Quantec scans (a non-intrusive surface topography system) and c) the validity of the Quantec Q-angle against Cobb angles from spinal radiographs, in non-ambulant children with cerebral palsy (CP). Eighteen non-ambulant children (aged 5–11 years) with CP had successful clinical, radiological and Quantec assessment of their spine while seated in a supportive seating system. Scoliosis incidence was 72%, Cobb angles ranged from 1–73° (mean 18.2°). Quantec scanning was feasible with appropriate postural support. Mean interobserver differences were 0.5 ± 5.8° (median 1.3°, 5 / 95th percentiles lying at −7.3 / 8.5° respectively). Mean differences between Cobb and Q-angle were 0.02 ± 6.2° (median 1.0°, with 5 / 95th percentiles lying at −8.2 / 7.7° respectively). Surface topography may be used to safely monitor the spine for non-ambulant CP children. Results show similar or improved trends to previous comparisons with idiopathic scoliosis. Ovadia (2007) showed an interobserver mean difference of 6.3 ± 4.9° using an Ortelius800TM system. Thometz (2000) showed mean differences between Cobb and Q-angle ranging from 1.1–12.6 ± 4.9–10.2°. Further research is needed for the user group described in this study with larger spinal curves. Ethics approval: Ethics approval granted by Leeds (West) Research Ethics Committee. COREC number: 08/H1307/22. Interest Statement: None

Aims. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence surrounding curve type and morphology on curve progression risk in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods. A comprehensive search was conducted by two independent reviewers on PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science to obtain all published information on morphological predictors of AIS progression. Search items included ‘adolescent idiopathic scoliosis’, ‘progression’, and ‘imaging’. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and level of evidence for each predictor was rated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. In all, 6,286 publications were identified with 3,598 being subjected to secondary scrutiny. Ultimately, 26 publications (25 datasets) were included in this review. Results. For unbraced patients, high and moderate evidence was found for Cobb angle and curve type as predictors, respectively. Initial Cobb angle > 25° and thoracic curves were predictive of curve progression. For braced patients, flexibility < 28% and limited in-brace correction were factors predictive of progression with high and moderate evidence, respectively. Thoracic curves, high apical vertebral rotation, large rib vertebra angle difference, small rib vertebra angle on the convex side, and low pelvic tilt had weak evidence as predictors of curve progression. Conclusion. For curve progression, strong and consistent evidence is found for Cobb angle, curve type, flexibility, and correction rate. Cobb angle > 25° and flexibility < 28% are found to be important thresholds to guide clinical prognostication. Despite the low evidence, apical vertebral rotation, rib morphology, and pelvic tilt may be promising factors. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):424–432

Introduction. There is no consensus among scoliosis surgeons on which surface topography method and parameters may be used as an alternative to serial radiography to monitor scoliosis progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-correlation among surface rotation (4-D formetric II) with 3-D Quantec scan and 2-D cobb's angle measurements for assessing torso asymmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Materials & Methods. A prospective cohort of consecutive 24 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was accrued from the departmental scoliosis surface topography database. This group comprised of conservatively treated, Spinecor brace treated and postoperative patients in order to assess the wider utility and validity of 2 different surface topography methods (Formetric II & Quantec Spinal Imaging System). Parameters assessed were Q-angle, Suzuki hump sum, Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI), surface rotation (rms), surface rotation (max) and maximum Cobb's angle on concurrently done scoliograms. Results. There were 3 male and 21 female patients (87.5%) at a mean age of 14.1 years (range, 10-20 years). Maximum Cobb's angle ranged from 9 degrees to 80 degrees. There was a significant correlation between Cobb angle (mean-35.1°) and Q-angle (mean-21.8°). Scatter plot and regression analysis showed a linear relationship between surface rotation (mean-9.9 root mean square) and POTSI (mean-42.5) as well as Q-angle. Suzuki hump sum was a less reliable parameter. Conclusions. Formimetric scans showed a linear correlation and reproducibility in patients with AIS receiving conservative treatment for smaller magnitude curves, when compared to Quantec scan. Due to ease of use, colourful and multi-mode representation of spinal deformity, Formetric may have an edge of preference for better clinic consultation to patient/parental appreciation of cosmetic issues and gain following treatment

Aims

Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Aims. This systematic review aims to identify 3D predictors derived from biplanar reconstruction, and to describe current methods for improving curve prediction in patients with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Methods. A comprehensive search was conducted by three independent investigators on MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Search terms included “adolescent idiopathic scoliosis”,“3D”, and “progression”. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined to include clinical studies. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool (QUIPS) and Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS), and level of evidence for each predictor was rated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. In all, 915 publications were identified, with 377 articles subjected to full-text screening; overall, 31 articles were included. Results. Torsion index (TI) and apical vertebral rotation (AVR) were identified as accurate predictors of curve progression in early visits. Initial TI > 3.7° and AVR > 5.8° were predictive of curve progression. Thoracic hypokyphosis was inconsistently observed in progressive curves with weak evidence. While sagittal wedging was observed in mild curves, there is insufficient evidence for its correlation with curve progression. In curves with initial Cobb angle < 25°, Cobb angle was a poor predictor for future curve progression. Prediction accuracy was improved by incorporating serial reconstructions in stepwise layers. However, a lack of post-hoc analysis was identified in studies involving geometrical models. Conclusion. For patients with mild curves, TI and AVR were identified as predictors of curve progression, with TI > 3.7° and AVR > 5.8° found to be important thresholds. Cobb angle acts as a poor predictor in mild curves, and more investigations are required to assess thoracic kyphosis and wedging as predictors. Cumulative reconstruction of radiographs improves prediction accuracy. Comprehensive analysis between progressive and non-progressive curves is recommended to extract meaningful thresholds for clinical prognostication. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(3):243–251

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of morphological spinal parameters to predict the outcome of bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a novel supine correction index (SCI) for guiding bracing treatment. Methods. Patients with AIS to be treated by bracing were prospectively recruited between December 2016 and 2018, and were followed until brace removal. In all, 207 patients with a mean age at recruitment of 12.8 years (SD 1.2) were enrolled. Cobb angles, supine flexibility, and the rate of in-brace correction were measured and used to predict curve progression at the end of follow-up. The SCI was defined as the ratio between correction rate and flexibility. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to assess the optimal thresholds for flexibility, correction rate, and SCI in predicting a higher risk of progression, defined by a change in Cobb angle of ≥ 5° or the need for surgery. Results. The baseline Cobb angles were similar (p = 0.374) in patients whose curves progressed (32.7° (SD 10.7)) and in those whose curves remained stable (31.4° (SD 6.1)). High supine flexibility (odds ratio (OR) 0.947 (95% CI 0.910 to 0.984); p = 0.006) and correction rate (OR 0.926 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.964); p < 0.001) predicted a lower incidence of progression after adjusting for Cobb angle, Risser sign, curve type, menarche status, distal radius and ulna grading, and brace compliance. ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off of 18.1% for flexibility (sensitivity 0.682, specificity 0.704) and a cut-off of 28.8% for correction rate (sensitivity 0.773, specificity 0.691) in predicting a lower risk of curve progression. A SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.251 to 0.955); sensitivity 0.583, specificity 0.591; p = 0.036). Conclusion. A higher supine flexibility (18.1%) and correction rate (28.8%), and a SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression. These novel parameters can be used as a guide to optimize the outcome of bracing. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):495–503

Aims. To systematically evaluate whether bracing can effectively achieve curve regression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify any predictors of curve regression after bracing. Methods. Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information about the effectiveness of bracing in achieving curve regression in AIS patients. Search terms included “brace treatment” or “bracing,” “idiopathic scoliosis,” and “curve regression” or “curve reduction.” Inclusion criteria were studies recruiting patients with AIS undergoing brace treatment and one of the study outcomes must be curve regression or reduction, defined as > 5° reduction in coronal Cobb angle of a major curve upon bracing completion. Exclusion criteria were studies including non-AIS patients, studies not reporting p-value or confidence interval, animal studies, case reports, case series, and systematic reviews. The GRADE approach to assessing quality of evidence was used to evaluate each publication. Results. After abstract and full-text screening, 205 out of 216 articles were excluded. The 11 included studies all reported occurrence of curve regression among AIS patients who were braced. Regression rate ranged from 16.7% to 100%. We found evidence that bracing is effective in achieving curve regression among compliant AIS patients eligible for bracing, i.e. curves of 25° to 40°. A similar effect was also found in patients with major curve sizes ranging from 40° to 60° when combined with scoliosis-specific exercises. There was also evidence showing that a low apical vertebral body height ratio, in-brace correction, smaller pre-brace Cobb angle, and daily pattern of brace-wear compliance predict curve regression after bracing. Conclusion. Bracing provides a corrective effect on scoliotic curves of AIS patients to achieve curve regression, given there is high compliance rate and the incorporation of exercises. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(3):286–292

Thoracic hyperkyphosis (TH – Cobb angle >40°) is correlated with rotator cuff arthropathy and associated with anterior tilting and protraction of scapula, impacting the glenoid orientation and the surrounding musculature. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable surgical treatment for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and recent literature suggests that patients with TH may have comparable range of motion after RTSA. However, there exists no study reporting the possible link between patient-reported outcomes, humeral retroversion and TH after RTSA. While the risk of post-operative complications such as instability, hardware loosening, scapular notching, and prosthetic infection are low, we hypothesize that it is critical to optimize the biomechanical parameters through proper implant positioning and understanding patient-specific scapular and thoracic anatomy to improve surgical outcomes in this subset of patients with TH. Patients treated with primary RTSA at an academic hospital in 2018 were reviewed for a two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no pre-existing chest radiographs for Cobb angle measurement, change in post-operative functional status as a result of trauma or medical comorbidities, and missing component placement and parameter information in the operative note. As most patients did not have a pre-operative chest radiograph, only seven patients with a Cobb angle equal to or greater than 40° were eligible. Chart reviews were completed to determine indications for RTSA, hardware positioning parameters such as inferior tilting, humeral stem retroversion, glenosphere size/location, and baseplate size. Clinical data following surgery included review of radiographs and complications. Follow-up in all patients were to a period of two years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score was used for patient-reported functional and pain outcomes. The average age of the patients at the time of RTSA was 71 years old, with six female patients and one male patient. The indication for RTSA was primarily rotator cuff arthropathy. Possible correlation between Cobb angle and humeral retroversion was noted, whereby, Cobb angle greater than 40° matched with humeral retroversion greater than 30°, and resulted in significantly higher ASES scores. Two patients with mean Cobb angle of 50° and mean humeral retroversion 37.5° had mean ASES scores of 92.5. Five patients who received mean humeral retroversion of 30° had mean lower ASES scores of 63.7 (p < 0 .05). There was no significant correlation with glenosphere size or position, baseplate size, degree of inferior tilting or lateralization. Patient-reported outcomes have not been reported in RTSA patients with TH. In this case series, we observed that humeral stem retroversion greater than 30° may be correlated with less post-operative pain and greater patient satisfaction in patients with TH. Further clinical studies are needed to understanding the biomechanical relationship between RTSA, humeral retroversion and TH to optimize patient outcomes

Aims. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion technique to correct scoliosis. It allows correction of scoliosis through growth modulation (GM) by tethering the convex side to allow concave unrestricted growth similar to the hemiepiphysiodesis concept. The other modality is anterior scoliosis correction (ASC) where the tether is able to perform most of the correction immediately where limited growth is expected. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data of 20 patients aged between 9 and 17 years old, (with a 19 female: 1 male ratio) between January 2014 to December 2016 with a mean five-year follow-up (4 to 7). Results. There were ten patients in each group with a total of 23 curves operated on. VBT-GM mean age was 12.5 years (9 to 14) with a mean Risser classification of 0.63 (0 to 2) and VBT-ASC was 14.9 years (13 to 17) with a mean Risser classification of 3.66 (3 to 5). Mean preoperative VBT-GM Cobb was 47.4° (40° to 58°) with a Fulcrum unbend of 17.4 (1° to 41°), compared to VBT-ASC 56.5° (40° to 79°) with 30.6 (2° to 69°)unbend. Postoperative VBT-GM was 20.3° and VBT-ASC Cobb angle was 11.2°. The early postoperative correction rate was 54.3% versus 81% whereas Fulcrum Bending Correction Index (FBCI) was 93.1% vs 146.6%. The last Cobb angle on radiograph at mean five years’ follow-up was 19.4° (VBT-GM) and 16.5° (VBT-ASC). Patients with open triradiate cartilage (TRC) had three over-corrections. Overall, 5% of patients required fusion. This one patient alone had a over-correction, a second-stage tether release, and final conversion to fusion. Conclusion. We show a high success rate (95%) in helping children avoid fusion at five years post-surgery. VBT is a safe technique for correction of scoliosis in the skeletally immature patient. This is the first report at five years that shows two methods of VBT can be employed depending on the skeletal maturity of the patient: GM and ASC. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):123–129

Primary care physicians rely on radiology reports to confirm a scoliosis diagnosis and inform the need for spine specialist referral. In turn, spine specialists use these reports for triage decisions and planning of care. To be a valid predictor of disease and management, radiographic evaluation should include frontal and lateral views of the spine and a complete view of the pelvis, leading to accurate Cobb angle measurements and Risser staging. The study objectives were to determine 1) the adequacy of index images to inform treatment decisions at initial consultation by generating a score and 2) the utility of index radiology reports for appropriate triage decisions, by comparing reports to corresponding images. We conducted a retrospective chart and radiographic review including all idiopathic scoliosis patients seen for initial consultation, aged three to 18 years, between January 1-April 30, 2021. A score was generated based on the adequacy of index images to provide accurate Cobb angle measurements and determine skeletal maturity (view of full spine, coronal=two, lateral=one, pelvis=one, ribcage=one). Index images were considered inadequate if repeat imaging was necessary. Comparisons were made between index radiology report, associated imaging, and new imaging if obtained at initial consultation. Major discrepancies were defined by inter-reader difference >15°, discordant Risser staging, or inaccuracies that led to inappropriate triage decisions. Location of index imaging, hospital versus community-based private clinic, was evaluated as a risk factor for inadequate or discrepant imaging. There were 94 patients reviewed with 79% (n=74) requiring repeat imaging at initial consultation, of which 74% (n=55) were due to insufficient quality and/or visualization of the sagittal profile, pelvis or ribcage. Of index images available for review at initial consult (n=80), 41.2% scored five out of five and 32.5% scored two or below. New imaging showed that 50.0% of those patients had not been triaged appropriately, compared to 18.2% of patients with a full score. Comparing index radiology reports to initial visit evaluation with <60 days between imaging (n=49), discrepancies in Cobb angle were found in 24.5% (95% CI 14.6, 38.1) of patients, with 18.4% (95% CI 10.0, 31.4) categorized as major discrepancies. Risser stage was reported in only 14% of index radiology reports. In 13.8% (n=13) of the total cohort, surgical or brace treatment was recommended when not predicted based on index radiology report. Repeat radiograph (p=0.001, OR=8.38) and discrepancies (p=0.02, OR=7.96) were increased when index imaging was obtained at community-based private clinic compared to at a hospital. Re-evaluation of available index imaging demonstrated that 24.6% (95% CI 15.2, 37.1) of Cobb angles were mis-reported by six to 21 degrees. Most pre-referral paediatric spine radiographs are inadequate for idiopathic scoliosis evaluation. Standardization of spine imaging and reporting should improve measurement accuracy, facilitate triage and decrease unnecessary radiation exposure

There is a need for non-radiographic, objective outcome measures for children with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Standing balance and stability is altered in children with AIS. The Margin of Stability (MoS) has been used to compare gait stability in clinical populations. Our objective was to compare the MoS in anterior-posterior (MoS. AP. ) and mediolateral (MoS. ML. ) directions in girls with AIS to Controls. Girls with AIS and healthy girls walked at three speeds on an instrumented treadmill wearing retroreflective markers, surrounded by motion capture cameras. The MoS. AP/ML. was calculated at left and right heel strike. Data was processed in Visual 3D. A two-way ANOVA was used to compare MoS. AP/ML. between group, speed and the interaction between group and speed. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to compare the MoS to Cobb angle. Statistical significance was accepted when p > 0.05. A priori power analysis suggested 12 participants per group. Three Cases and four Controls were recruited. Girls with AIS all had right-sided main thoracic curves (Lenke type 1a, 61.3° ± 10.0°). MoS. AP. was significantly bigger for Cases compared to Controls on the left (p=0.038) and right foot (p=0.041). There was no significant difference between Cases and Controls for MoS. ML. , but there was a visual trend for a smaller MoS. ML. in Cases. There was no significant difference for speed or the interaction between group and speed for MoS. AP. or MoS. ML. In Cases, MoS. AP. increased with increasing Cobb angle on the left (r. 2. =0.687, p=0.054) and right (r. 2. =0.634, p=0.067) and MoS. ML. decreased with increasing Cobb angle on the left (r. 2. =-0.912, p=0.002). Further subjects are being recruited. Girls with Lenke type 1a AIS are more stable in the AP direction and less stable in the ML direction than Controls during treadmill walking. AP stability increases and ML stability decreases with increasing Cobb angle. This research suggests that the MoS could be used as an outcome measure for children with AIS. Continued work is required to increase the power of this study. Further work could consider these changes during walking overground, measuring an MoS or MoS-like measure using a wearable device, and in different curve types

Aims. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have been gaining popularity in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past decade. We present our experience with the first 44 MCGR consecutive cases treated at our institution. Methods. This is a retrospective review of consecutive cases of MCGR performed in our institution between 2012 and 2018. This cohort consisted of 44 children (25 females and 19 males), with a mean age of 7.9 years (3.7 to 13.6). There were 41 primary cases and three revisions from other rod systems. The majority (38 children) had dual rods. The group represents a mixed aetiology including idiopathic (20), neuromuscular (13), syndromic (9), and congenital (2). The mean follow-up was 4.1 years, with a minimum of two years. Nine children graduated to definitive fusion. We evaluated radiological parameters of deformity correction (Cobb angle), and spinal growth (T1-T12 and T1-S1 heights), as well as complications during the course of treatment. Results. The mean Cobb angles pre-operatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up were 70° (53 to 103), 35° (15 to 71) and 39° (15 to 65) respectively (p < 0.001). Further, there was a mean of 14° (-6 to 27) of additional Cobb angle correction upon graduation from MCGR to definitive fusion. Both T1-T12 and T1-S1 showed significant increase in heights of 27 mm and 45 mm respectively at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Ten children (23%) developed 18 complications requiring 21 unplanned operations. Independent risk factors for developing a complication were single rod constructs and previous revision surgery. Conclusion. MCGR has the benefit of avoiding multiple surgeries, and is an effective tool in treatment of early-onset scoliosis. It also maintains the flexibility of the spine, allowing further correction at the time of definitive fusion. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:405–414

The purpose of this study is to evaluate risk factors for distal construct failure (DCF) in posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We observed an increased rate of DCF when the pedicle screw in the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was not parallel to the superior endplate of the LIV, however this has not been well studied in the literature. We hypothesise a more inferiorly angled LIV screw predisposes to failure and aim to find the critical angle that predisposes to failure. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients who underwent PSIF for AIS at the Starship Hospital spine unit from 2010 to 2020. On a lateral radiograph, the angle between the superior endplate of the LIV was measured against its pedicle screw trajectory. Data on demographics, Cobb angle, Lenke classification, instrumentation density, rod protrusion from the most inferior screw, implants and reasons for revision were collected. Of 256 patients, 10.9% (28) required at least one revision. The rate of DCF was 4.6% of all cases (12 of 260) and 25.7% of revisions were due to DCF. The mean trajectory angle of DCF patients compared to all others was 13.3° (95%CI 9.2° to 17.4°) vs 7.6° (7° to 8.2°), p=0.0002. The critical angle established is 11°, p=0.0076. Lenke 5 and C curves, lower preoperative Cobb angle, titanium only rod constructs and one surgeon had higher failure rates than their counterparts. 9.6% of rods protruding less than 3mm from its distal screw disengaged. We conclude excessive inferior trajectory of the LIV screw increases the rate of DCF and a screw trajectory greater than 11° predisposes to failure. This is one factor that can be controlled by the surgeon intraoperatively and by avoiding malposition of the LIV screw, a quarter of revisions can potentially be eliminated

Success treating AIS with bracing is related to time worn and scoliosis severity. Temperature monitoring can help patients comply with their orthotic prescription. Routinely collected temperature data from the start of first brace treatment was reviewed for 14 patients. All were female with an average age of 12.4 years (range 10.3–14.6) and average 49o Cobb angle (30–64). Our current service recommendation is brace wear for 20 hours a day. Patients complied with this prescription 38.0% of the time, with four patients averaging this or more. Average brace wear was 16.3 hours per day (3.5–22.2). There were 13 patients who had completed brace treatment. The majority had surgery (7/13; 54%) or were considering surgery (1/13; 8%). There were 5 who did not wish surgery at discharge (5/13; 38%); 1 achieved a 40o Cobb angle, with 4 larger (53o;53o;54o;68o). The Bracing in AIS Trial (BrAIST) study measured “success” as less than a 50o Cobb angle, so using this metric our cohort has had a single “success”. Temperature monitors allowed an analysis of when patients were achieving their brace wear. When comparing daywear (8am-8pm) to nightwear (8pm-8am), patients wore their brace an average of 7.6 hours a day (2.5–11.2) and 8.7 hours a night (0.4–11.5). We conclude the minority of our patients comply with our current 20 hour orthotic prescription. The “success” of brace treatment is lower than comparison studies despite higher average compliance but starting with a larger scoliosis. Brace wear is achieved during both the day and night