Introduction. There is growing evidence that patients with lumbar spine fusion are at greater risk for postoperative dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to review one author's experience with the modified direct lateral approach in patients with prior or subsequent lumbar spine fusion and total hip arthroplasty. Methods. Our IRB approved clinical database was queried for all primary total hip arthroplasties performed by the senior author from 1/1/2004 to 12/31/2016. All were performed via a modified direct lateral approach. Of these 1902 hips (1656 patients), 59 were identified in our medical records as patients who had a prior spine fusion or a spine fusion following THA. The extent of fusion was identified and reported. Radiographs were reviewed for acetabular position (abduction and anteversion) and leg length discrepancies. Records were reviewed and patients were contacted to determine if there were dislocations. Results. Of the 59 patients with concomitant spine fusion and total hip arthroplasty, 47 had the fusion prior to THA and 12 following THA. All patients were seen in the office or contacted by phone for a mean follow up of 5.8 years (2 to 15 years)(3 deceased, 3 lost). The direct lateral approach was used in all cases and in no cases was a dual mobility, lipped liner, or constrained component used. Head size ranged from 32 to 40. There were no postoperative dislocations in any of these patients. Acetabular position was a mean 43.6 degrees abduction (range 30–50), and a mean anteversion of 23.7 degrees (range 17 – 34). Average postoperative LLD was 2.8mm long on operated side (range −2mm to + 12mm). Spine fusion extent was a mean 2.1 levels (range 1 – 9) with 15 that included the sacrum/pelvis. Discussion. As surgeons have become aware of the elevated risk of hip dislocation associated with spine fusion/stiffness, several approaches have been proposed to address this risk. Our findings suggest that using the modified direct lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty significantly reduces the risk of such a complication. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare clinical, radiological and mortality outcomes of patients who underwent cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced neck of femur fractures using a SPAIRE technique when compared to a pair-matched control cohort who underwent the same procedure using the direct lateral approach. A retrospective review of patients who underwent cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced neck of femur fractures by a single surgeon using a SPAIRE technique over a two-year period between July 2019 and July 2021 was performed. These were subsequently pair matched in a 5:1 ratio for age, gender, ASA grade and residential status with a control group who underwent cemented hip hemiarthroplasty by 4 other surgeons using a direct lateral approach. The study included a total of 240 patients (40 and 200 pairmatched to SPAIRE and control groups respectively), with a mean age of 81.0 ± 8.2 years (63–99) and a mean follow-up of 12 ± 3 months (3–30). Overall, there was no significant difference in any of the radiological or mortality outcome scores assessed between the SPAIRE and control groups (p > 0.05 for all). There was a significantly lower number of patients in the SPAIRE group who dropped a level of mobility from their pre-injury baseline at 30-days post-operatively (8.1% versus 31.6%; p = 0.003). However, this appeared to have resolved at 120-day follow-up with no significant differences between the groups in terms of those acquiring a new baseline mobility at 120-days post-operatively (2.7% versus 13.2%, p = 0.09). In cases of cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures, the SPAIRE technique appears to offer patients an earlier return to levels of baseline pre-injury mobility when compared to a direct lateral approach

Aims. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the functional outcome of two different surgical approaches to the hip in patients with a femoral neck fracture treated with a hemiarthroplasty. Patients and Methods. A total of 150 patients who were treated between February 2014 and July 2017 were included. Patients were allocated to undergo hemiarthroplasty using either an anterolateral or a direct lateral approach, and were followed for 12 months. The mean age of the patients was 81 years (69 to 90), and 109 were women (73%). Functional outcome measures, assessed by a physiotherapist blinded to allocation, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected postoperatively at three and 12 months. Results. A total of 11 patients in the direct lateral group had a positive Trendelenburg test at one year compared with one patient in the anterolateral group (11/55 (20%) vs 1/55 (1.8%), relative risk (RR) 11.1; p = 0.004). Patients with a positive Trendelenburg test reported significantly worse Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) compared with patients with a negative Trendelenburg test. Further outcome measures showed few statistically significant differences between the groups. Conclusion. The direct lateral approach in patients with a femoral neck fracture appears to be associated with more positive Trendelenburg tests than the anterolateral approach, indicating a poor clinical outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:793–799

Aim: The direct lateral approach, as described by Hardinge et al, may have the advantage of reducing the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this paper is to describe a modification of the direct lateral approach used by the author on consecutive total hip arthroplasty for all patients; including primary arthritis, fractures and revisions over a period of five years. The incidence and causes of complications, specifically dislocation, is discussed. Method: A modification of the direct lateral approach, where gluteus minimus is split anteriorly rather than being detached from the greater trochanter, is described. This approach allowed its primary repair during wound closure, reducing surgical dead-space and theoretically reducing the incidence of dislocation. The records of all patients in whom the author performed this approach for total hip arthroplasty between 1 February 1994 and 1 February 1999 were examined. Patients were routinely seen at one year after operation and any early complications of surgery recorded. Minimum follow-up for this series was one year. Conclusion: This modification of the direct lateral approach which preserves the integrity of gluteus minimus while still allowing adequate exposure and is extensile, gave a very acceptable incidence of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for degenerative disease, fracture, and revision cases

Introduction. Early functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has the potential to increase patient satisfaction and reduce resource utilization. The direct anterior approach (DA) has been shown to provide earlier recovery compared to the direct lateral (DL) approach based on functional tests and outcome scores. There are limited studies that objectively evaluate functional recovery comparing the two approaches in the early post-operative period. Activity trackers have emerged as a valid tool to objectively quantify physical activity levels and potentially better assess functional status compared to commonly reported functional questionnaires. The purpose of this study is to measure physical activity levels in patients undergoing THA with the DA approach and compare these to THA with the direct lateral approach in the immediate postoperative period. Methods. In a tertiary academic center we prospectively enrolled patients with primary OA that were eligible for a primary THA undergoing either the DA or the DL approach using the same prosthesis. Patients with comorbidities precluding them from ambulation, diagnoses of AVN or RA or undergoing bilateral THA were excluded. The number of steps walked per day were measured using wristband activity tracking technology for one week preoperatively, the first 2 weeks postoperatively and for 1 week leading up to their 6-week follow-up appointment. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score was also collected at the same two time points. Demographics were analyzed with descriptive statistics. A non-parametric Mann Whitney U test was used to determine whether a difference in physical activity levels exist between the DA and DL approach groups in the first 2 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Results. One hundred and thirty-nine patients with primary OA were enrolled. Seventeen were withdrawn prior to beginning the study (7 – patient requested, 5 – could not work the activity tracker, 5 – health issues). Following enrolment 29 patients were withdrawn due to lack of data available for analysis. There were 53 patients in the DA group and 40 patients in the DL group. Patient demographics including age and gender were similar in both groups. Body mass index was higher in the DL group (32.4 ± 6.9) compared to the DA group (28.2 ± 3.9) (p=0.001). There was no difference in the average steps taken per day or the UCLA score between the two groups preoperatively. The UCLA score and the overall average steps walked collected at 2 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the DA group compared to the DL group (median 4(1–6) vs. 3(2–6), p<0.001 and median 1641(329 – 8678) vs. 890(87 – 4347), p<0.001) respectively. When each postoperative day was evaluated individually, the DA group had a greater number of steps per day for the entire two weeks. At 6 weeks, the average number of steps taken by the DA group (median 4734 (1703 – 16605) () were greater than those taken by the DL group (median 3534 (462–8665) ± 2263) (p=0.007). A similar finding was demonstrated for the UCLA with the DA having greater self-reported activity levels (median 6 vs. 4, p<0.001). Discussion/Conclusions. The DA approach provided faster functional recovery in the immediate postoperative period compared to the DL approach as measured by a wristband activity tracker. DA approach patients walked a greater number of steps at both 2 weeks and 6 weeks. Further examination regarding the economic implications of the improved early function from the perspective of the patient, caregiver, and care payer is indicated

We examined the position of the superior gluteal nerve in forty-four cadaveric hips in relation to the greater trochanter and the acetabulum . We found that the nerve lay a mean of 4.8 centimetres from the greater trochanter with a range of two to nine centimetres and a mean of 3.2 centimetres from the acetabulum. The nerve was visibly damaged in three out of forty-four hips following direct lateral approach. Our study does not support the “safe zone” proximal to the greater trochanter and suggests the proximity of the nerve to the acetabulum as a potential cause of nerve injury. Abductor weakness following the direct lateral approach to the hip is well described and is associated with damage to the superior gluteal nerve on neurophysiological testing in from 23–26 %. A “safe zone” has been described of up to five centimeters proximal to the greater trochanter. We examined forty-four cadaveric hips exposed by the direct lateral approach by surgeons not directly involved with the study. We measured the position of the superior gluteal nerve in relation to the greater trochanter, the acetabulum and the margin of the skin incision. We examined the nerve for visible signs of damage. We found the position of the superior gluteal nerve to be a mean of 4.8 centimeters from the greater trochanter (range two to nine), 3.2 centimeters from the superior margin of the acetabulum (range one to eight), and 4.1 centimeters from the margin of the skin incision. There was visible damage to the nerve in three of forty-four cases. Neurophysiological studies show subclinical damage to the superior gluteal nerve in up to 77% of cases following direct lateral approach to the hip and in association with abductor weakness in 23–26%. Our study does not support the notion of a “safe zone” of five centimetres proximal to the greater trochanter, and with a mean of 4.8 centimetres the zone is unsafe more often than it is safe. The proximity of the superior gluteal nerve to the superior margin of the acetabulum suggests that it may be damaged by retractor placement at this site

The increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is having a significant impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased interest in outpatient care pathways to reduce resource consumption. This study compared costs between patients who underwent outpatient THA using a Direct Anterior (DA) approach compared to a Direct Lateral (DL) approach to understand the effect of surgical approach on resource use. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial for DA patients undergoing primary THA. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the trial to a prospective cohort of outpatient DL approach THAs. We recorded all costs including: equipment, length of stay in hospital, and laboratory or other medical tests. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary recording resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, use of pain medications, informal care, productivity losses and out of pocket expenditures. We report costs from both Canadian public health care payer (HCP) and a societal perspective. The HCP perspective includes any direct health costs covered by the publicly funded system. In addition to the health care system costs, the societal perspective also includes additional costs to the patient (e.g. physiotherapy, medication, or assistive devices), as well as any indirect costs such as time off paid employment for patients or caregivers. We included 127 patients in the DA group (66.6 years old) and 51 patients in the DL group (59.4 years old) (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from both the healthcare payer (DA= 7910.19, DL= 7847.17, p=0.80) and societal perspectives (DA= 14657.21, DL= 14581.21, p=0.96). In patients undergoing a successful outpatient hip replacement, surgical approach does not have an effect on cost from in hospital or societal perspectives

Aims: To compare incidence of abductor dysfunction using two direct lateral approaches, a more conventional approach and a new modified approach that reliably identifies and separately detaches gluteus minimus from the greater trochanter to allow its subsequent secure repair. Methods: We followed-up 73 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty by a single senior surgeon using one of two direct lateral approaches. With the more conventional approach (33 patients) medius and minimus were not reliable detached separately from the trochanter; minimus was either detached en mass with the anterior half of medius or detached during capsulotomy/capsulectomy. The new modified approach (40 patients), developed after careful study of the anatomy of the attachments of the glutei, involved division of the anterior half of medius leaving a 1 cm cuff of tissue attached to the trochanter and allowed reliable identification and separate detachment of minimus. Stay sutures were used in a novel way to achieve a more secure reattachment to try and reduce the risk of failure of the repair. Abductor function was assessed by Trendelenberg testing at 1-year post-arthroplasty. Results: The incidence of abductor dysfunction was 12% with the more conventional approach and 2.5% with the new modified approach. Conclusions: A significantly reduced incidence of abductor dysfunction occurred with our new modified approach and we believe this provides evidence for the importance of separate identification of gluteus minimus and its careful reattachment in ensuring good abductor function

Background. It is unclear whether the approach of hemiarthroplasty influence the outcomes in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the direct lateral approach (DL approach) and posterolateral approach (PL approach) for hemiarthroplasty. Methods. This study included patients presenting to our hospital with displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden stage 3 or 4) from August 2010 to August 2011. 59 patients agreed the prospective study. They were randomized between the hemiarthroplasty using DL approach or PL approach. We evaluated and compared the operative time, perioperative blood loss, peri- and post-operative complications, and 5-year survival rates. Results. Thirty-two patients underwent the hemiarthroplasty using DL approach and 27 patients underwent hemiarthroplasty using PL approach. The mean operative time was 91 min in DL group and 77 min in PL group. A significant difference was observed for the mean operative times(p<0.005). The bleeding during surgery was 194 g in DL group and 180 g in PL group. The postoperative blood loss was 268 g in DL group and 264 g in PL group, no significant difference was observed postoperatively. Perioperative and postoperative complications were observed in 8 patients of DL group and 5 patients of the PL group. In DL group, perioperative complications included fracture in 1 patient, whereas postoperative complications included deep vein thrombosis in 7 patients. In PL group, postoperative complications included deep vein thrombosis in 3 patients, deep infection in 1 patient and subluxation of the outerhead in 1 patient. Two patients of DL group and 3patients of PL group suffered second hip fractures within the follow-up period, and 1 patient of PL group suffered periprosthetic fracture and treated conservatively. We identified 28 patients as dead in the follow-up period. The 5-year survival rate of DL group was 51.3% and that of PL group was 44.2%; there were not significantly different between the groups (log-rank test, p = 0.324). Conclusion. The mean operative time was significantly longer in DL groups, but peri- and post-operative complications and the surbival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. Surgical approach might not affect the outcomes of hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures

Background

Proper positioning of the acetabular component is critical for prevention of dislocation and excessive wear for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing. Consideration of preoperative pelvic tilt (PT) may aid in acetabular component placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate how PT changes after hip resurfacing, via pre and post-operative radiographic analysis of anterior pelvic plane (APP), and whether radiographic analysis of the APP is a reproducible method for evaluating PT in resurfaced hips.

Goal. The goal of this prospective, non-randomized study is to compare functional and life-quality changes in primary total hip replacement (THR) with minimally invasive anterior (MIA) and direct lateral (DL) approach in six months follow-up. Materials and Methods. Sixty (30 MIA and 30 DL) consecutive patients underwent primary THR were operated by the same senior surgeon. Patients completed functional and life-quality scores (Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score, EQ-5D) before operation and four times (2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months) after THR. Physical examination was taken all times. 15–15 patients underwent MRI examination to adjudge status of abductor muscles. The average patient age was approximately equal in both group. Results. The average OHS values were 13,4; 27,5; 40,9; 45,3; 47,5 in MIA and 15,3; 25,3; 39,7; 43,8; 45 in DL, the average HHS values 43,1; 68,7; 85,3; 91,9; 96,7 in MIA and 43; 58,2; 81,5; 90,2; 93,9 in DL, the average EQ-VAS 41,1; 72,5; 85,9; 87,8; 92,4 in MIA and 55,6; 67,8; 80,6; 84; 91,3 in DL consecutively. In MIA group both functional and life-quality scores showed better results, but for the 3rd postoperative month increases were approximately equal. Abductor muscle strength was significantly greater in MIA group in this period. In the 6th postoperative week Trendelenburg-sign was detected in 24 cases (80%) in DL and in 2 cases (6,7%) in MIA group, but in MIA patients were greater trochanter fractures, which had gone healing and limping was not detected 3 months after surgery. 3 months after surgery Trendelenburg-sign was detected in 2 cases in DL group. In follow-up period residual trochanteric pain was detected in 3 cases in DL but none in MIA group. Two weeks after THR climbing a flight of stairs was normal and public transport could be used by 80% of patients in MIA group. Distance walk was unlimited, support had not needed, daily activities were easy. There were 7 operative complications in MIA group, including 2 greater trochanter fracture, 1 haematoma and 4 transient lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy, which showed change for the better after 6 months. Postoperative hip dislocation was not detected. In DL group MRI represented fatty infiltration and atrophy of abductor muscles in most cases. Conclusions. Besides the fact that our learning curve may influence the results. It seems that earlier mobilisation and faster postoperative recovery can be achieved by MIA approach, which have many financial and social benefits. It preserves muscles and tendons, which probably can influence the long-term results. By preventing abductor muscles can assure better gait pattern. Of course additional long-term studies are needed

The direct lateral (or anterolateral) approaches to the hip for revision THA involve detachment of the anterior aspect of the gluteus medius from the trochanter along with a contiguous sleeve of the vastus lateralis. Anterior retraction of this flap of gluteus medius and vastus lateralis and simultaneous posterior retraction of the femur creates an interval for division of gluteus minimus and deeper capsular tissues and exposure of the joint. To enhance reattachment of this flap of the anterior portion of the gluteus medius and vastus lateralis back to the trochanter, an oblique wafer of bone can be elevated along with the muscle off of the anterolateral portion of the trochanter. This bony wafer prevents suture pull out when large nonabsorbable sutures are used around or through the fragment and passed into the bone of the trochanteric bed for reattachment during closure. To prevent excessive splitting proximally into the gluteus medius muscle (and resulting damage to the superior gluteal nerve), it is often helpful to extend the muscle split further distally down into the vastus lateralis. This combined with careful elevation of the gluteal muscles off of the ilium (instead of splitting them) helps provide excellent and safe exposure of the entire rim of the acetabulum and access to the supracetabular region for bone grafting, acetabular augment placement and even fixation of the flanges of a cage.

A simple method for posterior column plating via the anterolateral approach involves contouring of the distal end of the plate around the base of the ischium at the inferior edge of the socket.

When an extended osteotomy of the femur is needed to correct deformity, remove a well-fixed implant or cement, the “extensile” variation of this same surgical approach involves a Wagner style (lateral to medial) osteotomy of the greater trochanter and proximal femur. The anterior portion of the femur after it is osteotomised is elevated as a separate segment while maintaining the soft tissue attachments to the bone as much as possible to aid osteotomy healing. After implant or cement removal, this approach gives excellent direct access to the distal femur for placement of a long stem revision femoral component without bone-implant conflict proximally because of the bow of the femur.

The anterolateral approach (and extensile variants detailed above) can be used routinely and safely in the full range of revision THA procedures, or it can be employed selectively, if desired, in cases at increased risk for dislocation.

Introduction. Many authors have described component position and leg length discrepancy (LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the most important factors for good postoperative outcomes. However, regarding the relationships between component position and different approaches for THA, the optimal approach for component position and LLD remains unknown. The aims of this study were to compare these factors among the direct anterior, posterolateral, and direct lateral approaches on postoperative radiographs retrospectively, and determine which approach leads to good orientation in THA. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 150 patients who underwent unilateral primary THA in our department between January 2009 and December 2014, with the direct anterior, posterolateral, or direct lateral approach used in 50 patients each. Patients with significant hip dysplasia (Crowe 3 or 4), advanced erosive arthritis, prevented osteotomy of the contralateral hip, and body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 were excluded. The mean age, sex, and preoperative diagnosis of the affected hip were equally distributed in patients who underwent THA with the different approaches. The mean BMI did not differ significantly among the groups. The radiographic measurements included cup inclination angle, dispersion of cup inclination from 40°, and LLD on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph, and cup anteversion angle and dispersion of cup anteversion from 20° on a cross-table lateral radiograph postoperatively. We also measured the ratios of patients with both cup inclination of 30–50° and cup anteversion of 10–30° (target zone in our department), femoral stem varus/valgus, and LLD of 10 mm or less. Statistical analyses used an unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test, with significance set at p<0.05. Results. The mean cup inclination was 36.9±5.1° for direct anterior approach, 40.8±7.5° for posterolateral approach, and 38.5±7.5° for direct lateral approach. Dispersion of cup inclination from 40° was almost identical in the three groups, with no significant differences. The mean cup anteversion was 23.4±5.5° for direct anterior approach, 25.9±9.2° for posterolateral approach, and 24.3±8.6° for direct lateral approach. Dispersion of cup anteversion from 20° differed between direct anterior approach and posterolateral or direct lateral approach (P<0.05 for each). The mean LLD was 1.3±6.6mm for direct anterior approach, 3.0±8.6mm for posterolateral approach, and 2.6±7.4mm for direct lateral approach. The mean LLD did not differ significantly among the three groups. The ratio of patients with both cup inclination of 30–50° and cup anteversion of 10–30° was significantly better for direct anterior approach than for posterolateral or direct lateral approach (78% vs. 52% and 52%, respectively; p<0.05). The ratios of femoral stem varus/valgus and LLD of 10 mm or less did not differ among the groups. Conclusions. The direct anterior approach in THA appeared to have small dispersion of cup anteversion angle and high ratio of cup component position in our target zone compared with the posterolateral and direct lateral approaches. However, the LLD and femoral stem varus/valgus after THA did not differ significantly among the three approaches postoperatively

Anterior surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased popularity due to expected faster recovery and less pain. However, the direct anterior approach (Heuter approach which has been popularised by Matta) has been associated with a higher rate of early revisions than other approaches due to femoral component loosening and fractures. It is also noted to have a long learning curve and other unique complications like anterior femoral cutaneous and femoral nerve injuries. Most surgeons performing this approach will require the use of an expensive special operating table. An alternative to the direct anterior approach is the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach. It is also known as the modified Watson-Jones approach, anterolateral muscle-sparing approach, minimally invasive anterolateral approach and the Röttinger approach. With this technique, the hip joint is approached through the muscle interval between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteal muscles, as opposed to the direct anterior approach which is between the sartorius and rectus femoris and the tensor fascia lata. This approach places the femoral nerve at less risk for injury. I perform this technique in the lateral decubitus position, but it can also be performed in the supine position. An inexpensive home-made laminated L-shaped board is clamped on end of table allowing the ipsilateral leg to extend, adduct, and externally rotate during the femoral preparation. This approach for THA has been reported to produce excellent results. One study reports a complication rate of 0.6% femoral fracture rate and 0.4% revision rate for femoral stem loosening. In a prospective randomised trial looking at the learning curve with new approach, the anterior-based muscle-sparing anterior approach had lower complications than a direct anterior approach. The complications and mean operative time with this approach are reported to be no different than a direct lateral approach. Since this surgical approach is not through an internervous interval, a concern is that this may result in a permanent functional defect as result of injury to the superior gluteal nerve. At a median follow-up of 9.3 months, a MRI study showed 42% of patients with this approach had fat replacement of the tensor fascia lata, which is thought to be irreversible. The clinical significance remains unclear, and inconsequential in my experience. A comparison MRI study showed that there was more damage and atrophy to the gluteus medius muscle with a direct lateral approach at 3 and 12 months. My anecdotal experience is that there is faster recovery and less early pain with this approach. A study of the first 57 patients I performed showed significantly less pain and faster recovery in the first six weeks in patients performed with the anterior-based muscle-sparing approach when compared to a matched cohort of THA patients performed with a direct lateral approach. From 2004 to 2017, I have performed 1308 total hip replacements with the anterior-based muscle sparing approach. Alternatively, I will use the direct lateral approach for patients with stiff hips with significant flexion and/or external rotation contractures where I anticipate difficulty with femoral exposure, osteoporotic femurs due to increased risk of intraoperative trochanteric fractures, previously operated hips with scarring or retained hardware, and Crowe III-IV dysplastic hips when there may be a need for a femoral shortening or derotational osteotomy. Complications have been very infrequent. This approach is a viable alternative to the direct anterior approach for patients desiring a fast recovery. The anterior-based muscle-sparing approach is the approach that I currently use for all outpatient total hip surgeries

Aims. The aims of the study were to report for a cohort aged younger than 40 years: 1) indications for HRA; 2) patient-reported outcomes in terms of the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS); 3) dislocation rate; and 4) revision rate. Methods. This retrospective analysis identified 267 hips from 224 patients who underwent an hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) from a single fellowship-trained surgeon using the direct lateral approach between 2007 and 2019. Inclusion criteria was minimum two-year follow-up, and age younger than 40 years. Patients were followed using a prospectively maintained institutional database. Results. A total of 217 hips (81%) were included for follow-up analysis at a mean of 3.8 years. Of the 23 females who underwent HRA, none were revised, and the median head size was 46 mm (compared to 50 mm for males). The most common indication for HRA was femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (n = 133), and avascular necrosis ( (n = 53). Mean postoperative HHS was 100 at two and five years. No dislocations occurred. A total of four hips (1.8%) required reoperation for resection of heterotopic ossification, removal of components for infection, and subsidence with loosening. The overall revision rate was 0.9%. Conclusion. For younger patients with higher functional expectations and increased lifetime risk for revision, HRA is an excellent bone preserving intervention carrying low complication rates, revision rates, and excellent patient outcomes without lifetime restrictions allowing these patients to return to activity and sport. Thus, in younger male patients with end-stage hip disease and higher demands, referral to a high-volume HRA surgeon should be considered. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(6):408–415

Introduction: There is an increased risk of revision for aseptic loosening with a transgluteal approach as described in the Swedish Hip Register. Femoral component malpositioning is itself associated with a poor outcome. A cuff of posteriorly situated glutei during the direct lateral approach may result in levering the proximal stem anteriorly and the tip of the stem posteriorly and does not allow the entry point of the stem to be placed posteriorly at the level of neck resection resulting in possible malpositioning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference in femoral component alignment when the posterior and direct lateral approaches are compared. Materials and methods: Forty patients underwent an direct lateral approach and forty a posterior approach (n = 80). Inclusion criteria included primary hip arthroplasty using a cemented Exeter femoral component. At 6 weeks a standard AP and a modified lateral radiograph were taken. Measurements were taken from digitized radiographs as follows:. 1. AP radiograph. A Tip of stem to outer medial cortex. B Tip of stem to outer lateral cortex. 2. Lateral radiograph. C Tip of stem to anterior outer cortex. D Tip of stem to posterior outer cortex. Component alignment was defined as A – B and C – D. Results: A–B was 0.71 for the modified direct lateral approach and 2.56 for the posterior approach. C–D was 1.47 for the direct lateral approach and 1.21 for the posterior approach. This difference was not statistically different using paired t tests as p > 0.05(P=0.69) for lateral views measurements. Discussion: This study demonstrates that there is no significant difference between direct lateral and posterior approaches as far as femoral component alignment is concerned. The increased revision rate noted by the Swedish Hip Register when a transgluteal approach is likely to be multifactorial, but not likely to be due to femoral component malalignment

Introduction: There is an increased risk of revision for aseptic loosening with a transgluteal approach as described in the Swedish Hip Register. Femoral component malpositioning is itself associated with a poor outcome. A cuff of posteriorly situated glutei during the direct lateral approach may result in levering the proximal stem anteriorly and the tip of the stem posteriorly and does not allow the entry point of the stem to be placed posteriorly at the level of neck resection resulting in possible malpositioning. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference in femoral component alignment when the posterior and direct lateral approaches are compared. Materials and methods: Forty patients underwent a direct lateral approach and forty a posterior approach (n = 80). Inclusion criteria included primary hip arthroplasty using a cemented Exeter femoral component. At 6 weeks a standard AP and a modified lateral radiograph were taken. Measurements were taken from digitized radiographs as follows:. AP radiograph. Tip of stem to outer medial cortex. Tip of stem to outer lateral cortex. Lateral radiograph. C Tip of stem to anterior outer cortex. D Tip of stem to posterior outer cortex. Component alignment was defined as A – B and C – D. Results: A–B was 0.71 for the modified direct lateral approach and 2.56 for the posterior approach. C–D was 1.47 for the direct lateral approach and 1.21 for the posterior approach. This difference was not statistically different using paired t tests as p > 0.05(P=0.69) for lateral views measurements. Discussion: This study demonstrates that there is no significant difference between direct lateral and posterior approaches as far as femoral component alignment is concerned. The increased revision rate noted by the Swedish Hip Register when a transgluteal approach is likely to be multifactorial, but not likely to be due to femoral component malalignment

Isolated liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of polyethylene wear is an increasingly common surgical procedure. Twenty-four hips underwent this procedure via the direct lateral approach and were prospectively followed clinically and radiographically. Accessible osteolytic lesions were curetted and bone grafted. At a mean follow-up of forty months, a significant clinical improvement was observed. One cup collapsed into an osteolytic lesion postoperatively; all other lesions regressed. No dislocations have occurred. Isolated liner exchange via the direct lateral approach may reduce dislocation rates while avoiding the morbidity associated with the removal of well-fixed components. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of isolated liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteolysis and polyethylene wear via the direct lateral surgical approach. Retention of well-fixed implants avoids unnecessary bone loss at revision surgery. Previous studies report a significant dislocation rate with isolated liner exchange. Revision via the direct lateral surgical approach may reduce the dislocation rate in surgery for acetabular osteolysis. Twenty-four hips that underwent an isolated liner exchange revision procedure via the direct lateral approach were prospectively followed. Accessible osteolytic lesions were curetted and bone grafted. Harris Hip Score, WOMAC Index, and radiographic analysis were recorded. The area of osteolytic lesions was calculated using a computer imaging technique. At mean follow-up of forty months, all except one of the osteolytic lesions had regressed in size. Mean Harris Hip scores improved from sixty-nine to eighty-three and WOMAC indices improved from thirty-seven to twenty-four. No dislocations have occurred. One cup collapsed into an osteolytic lesion postoperatively, requiring an acetabular revision procedure. Isolated liner exchange is a promising technique that avoids the removal of well-fixed acetabular implants. The increased dislocation rate associated with revision THA may be reduced and osteolytic lesions may be debrided and bone grafted through the direct lateral approach. Isolated liner exchange via the direct lateral approach reduces the dislocation rate in THA. Retention of wellfixed implants and bone grafting is a procedure that preserves bone stock and addresses osteolytic lesions at revision surgery

Traditional risk factors for post-operative neuropathy include learning curve of surgical approach, DDH, and significant leg lengthening (>1 inch). Despite these risk factors, the most common scenario of a neuropathy is in a routine THA, by an experienced surgeon, for osteoarthritis, with no leg lengthening. Post-operative hematoma can lead to nerve compression, albeit rarely. The usual clinical presentation is of an acute event, with a previously intact nerve, sometime within the first days of surgery. Once diagnosed, immediate surgical decompression should be performed. Sciatic neuropathy is the most common, regardless of surgical approach, but the posterior approach poses the highest risk. Routine gluteus maximus tendon release may help to reduce the risk. When seen in the PACU, our approach is to immediately perform CT imaging to evaluate nerve integrity or to check on acetabular screw position. If no underlying cause is identified, the patient will be managed conservatively with foot orthotics and monitored for recovery. Femoral nerve palsy (FNP) can result in significant initial disability. Fortunately most patients recover function (although it can take over 18 months). In the early post-operative period it is often diagnosed after a patient complains of the leg giving away while attempting to walk. A knee brace will assist the patient with mobilization while the nerve recovers. The highest incidence of FNP is described for the direct lateral approach. Superior gluteal nerve (SGN) palsy is related to the direct lateral approach and may be avoided if the gluteus medius split is made within the safe zone (<5 centimeters from the tip of the greater trochanter). While early post-operative limp is common after the direct lateral approach, the true reported incidence of SGN palsy is low. Few studies showed that the persistent positive Trendelenburg test and limp is not exclusively related to the SGN damage and therefore the clinical effect of the SGN damage remains controversial. Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve can be affected during the direct anterior hip approach. One study suggests the presence of peri-incisional numbness in over 80% of patients. This is akin to numbness seen lateral to the incision after TKA. The incidence of meralgia paresthetica is extremely low (<1%)

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the MIS Anterolateral Approach to that of the MIS Posterolateral and MIS Direct Lateral Approach. Method. A prospective randomized control trial was designed and conducted to compare the MIS Anterolateral Approach to that of the MIS Posterolateral and MIS Direct Lateral Approach. Contemporary methods for economic evaluation were used to ascertain direct and indirect costs (in Canadian dollars) along with clinical effectiveness outcomes (SF6D and Pat5D utility measures). University and hospital ethics was obtained and patients were recruited and consented to participate in the RCT resulting in the assignment of 130 patients MIS hip arthroplasty procedures. Baseline patient demographics, comorbidity, quality of life, and utility were obtained for all patients. In-hospital costing data was obtained including operating room and patient room costs as well as medication, rehab and complications. Post-discharge costs were calculated from direct and indirect costs of medication, rehab, medical costs and complications until one year post-operatively. Clinical effectiveness measures were administered at intervals until one year post-operatively. Results. Patient groupings were similar pre-operatively with regards to demographic variables and quality of life measures (WOMAC, SF36, Pat5D). Post-operatively comparison of costs and complications were not different across the different surgical approaches (p>.05). Cost-effectiveness analyses (cost/QALY) were not statistically different (p>.05) when comparing the three MIS hip arthroplasty procedures. Conclusion. Primary total hip arthroplasty is a cost-effective surgical procedure and compares favorably with other health interventions. Our study is among the first to compare the cost-effectiveness of different MIS surgical approaches using contemporary methods of cost-effectiveness analyses. Our data suggests that the MIS Anterolateral approach is not superior to the MIS Posterolateral or MIS Direct Lateral approach with regards to cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Our economic evaluation was sensitive to early post-op complications including dislocation and re-operation. Surgeons should select an MIS approach based on criteria including technical preference, reliable implant placement, patient safety and complication minimization