Background: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Edition (the Journal) recently initiated a section called “Evidence-Based Orthopaedics”. Furthermore, a Levels of Evidence rating is now used in the Journal to help readers in clinical decision-making. Little is known if this recent emphasis of Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) influenced surgeons’ perceptions about and competence in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, we examined perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine among Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. Methods: Members of the Dutch Orthopaedic Association were surveyed to examine surgeons’ attitudes towards evidence-based medicine and competence in evidence-based medicine. We evaluated perceptions using a newly developed instrument tailored to surgical practice. Univariate analysis, and a multivariable analysis using Generalized Estimating Equations were performed to model the competence instrument. Results: 367 Surgeons responded (60%). Orthopaedic surgeons welcomed evidence-based medicine. Practical evidence-based medicine resources were perceived as the best methods to move from eminence-based to evidence-based practice. Four variables were significantly and positively associated with the competence instrument:. 1) younger age, particularly age between 36 and 45 years,. 2) experience of less than 10 years,. 3) having a PhD degree, and. 4) working in an academic or teaching setting. The majority of the respondents (65%) were aware of the Journal’s evidence-based medicine section, and 20% used the Journal’s evidence-based medicine abstracts in clinical decision-making. This increased awareness in evidence-based medicine was also reflected in a frequent use of Cochrane reviews in clinical decision-making (27%). Surgeons who used the Journal’s evidence-based medicine abstracts and Cochrane reviews had significantly higher competence scores. Conclusions: Evidence-based medicine is welcomed by Dutch orthopaedic surgeons. Recent emphasis of evidence-based medicine is reflected in an increased awareness about the Journal’s evidence-based medicine section, Levels of Evidence, and the largest evidence-based medicine resource: Cochrane reviews. Younger orthopaedic surgeons had better knowledge about evidence-based medicine. Development and use of evidence-based resources as well as pre-appraised summaries like the Journal’s evidence-based medicine abstracts and Cochrane reviews were perceived as the best way to move from eminence based- to evidence-based orthopaedic practice

Introduction: Evidence-based medicine is a form of practice in which the physician accesses relevant, state-of-the-art research findings to guide the care of the individual patient (Gordon and Cameron, 2000). Therefore, evidence-based medicine should influence the decision making process when developing a treatment algorithm for early stage osteonecrosis. It was the purpose of this project to explore the literature concerning surgical options that are used currently to treat early stage osteonecrosis. Materials and Methods: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed (National Library of Medicine, USA) to identify journal articles pertaining to the treatment of pre-arthrosis osteonecrosis during the past decade. The articles were screened to include only those with greater than 5 patients and greater than two year follow-up. Results: Published reports in medical journals included: core decompression with and without nonvascular grafting (18); core decompression augmented with BMP or bone marrow cells (2); bone cement (1); vascularized graft – fibular or iliac (10); osteotomy (26); osteotomy and vascularized grafts (3); trap-door procedure (2); and hemiarthroplasty/resurfacing arthroplasty (9). There was one review of nonoperative treatment, but no clinical studies. There were only a few case reports concerning osteochondral graft/osteochondroplasty; which did not meet the inclusion criteria. Several classification systems were used: Ficat and Arlet (55%); University of Pennsylvania / Steinberg (21%); Japanese Investigational Committee (13%); Marcus (2%); Myers (3%); ARCO (5%), and other (1%). A majority of reports included follow-up of 5 years or greater (91%). Most studies (91%) were not randomized, control-matched, or prospective. Discussion: Several surgical options are available for the treatment of pre-arthrosis osteonecrosis. However, it is not possible to apply evidence-based medicine practices to the research relating to the treatment of osteonecrosis as most of the research is not controlled and not comparative. This represents a substantial void in our knowledge base concerning osteonecrosis which remains to be filled

Background. This survey was conducted to gain information about how surgeons use scientific literature and how this is influenced by their knowledge of evidence-based medicine. The results were compared to a survey conducted 10 years previously. Where appropriate, the same questions as in the 2003 survey were used. Methods. We administered a voluntary questionnaire to participants at the AO Foundation courses in Davos, Switzerland, in December 2013. We surveyed, amongst other topics, the surgeons’ levels of education in Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), how they implement EBM in daily practice and their publication record. Results. A total of 330 surgeons completed the 27 question survey. 49% (159/322) had learned about EBM in medical school. However, 69% (110/159) of those with EBM education had taken only one semester or less on the subject. 54% of participants (170/317) correctly identified a definition of EBM in surgery. This compares to 45% in the 2003 survey (130/288 respondents) of a subset who said they have previously heard of evidence-based orthopaedic surgery. When it came to applying EBM in their daily work, 45% of respondents (143/320) claim to always practice it (2003 figure: 28%, 113/404), while 26% (84/320) only use EBM for difficult or controversial cases (2003 figure: 26%, 104/404). 27% (88/323) have never published a manuscript as an author or co-author (2003 figure: 14%, 121/453), 53% (170/323) have been involved in 1–10 publications (2003 figure: 59%, 269/453), and 20% (65/323) have published more than 10 times (2003 figure: 27%, 63/453). Conclusions. While at face value there appears to be a greater understanding and utilisation of EBM among AO course participants who completed the 2013 survey compared to the 2003 study, several outcomes do not show any great variation in the intervening decade. Level of Evidence. professional survey

We wished to see if Orthopaedic Surgeons are using the current evidence with regard to the use of drains in knee arthroplasty. A questionnaire was faxed to UK members of BASK.

We had a 71. 7% response rate (160 responses out of 223). For primary TKR, 89. 5% always use a drain. 42. 1% removed their drains at between 24 and 48 hours. The commonest reason for using drains was to prevent haematoma or haemarthrosis development.

The study suggests that the majority of BASK members do not practice evidence based medicine with regard to the use of knee drains.

Aims. The principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) are the foundation of modern medical practice. Surgeons are familiar with the commonly used statistical techniques to test hypotheses, summarize findings, and provide answers within a specified range of probability. Based on this knowledge, they are able to critically evaluate research before deciding whether or not to adopt the findings into practice. Recently, there has been an increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze information and derive findings in orthopaedic research. These techniques use a set of statistical tools that are increasingly complex and may be unfamiliar to the orthopaedic surgeon. It is unclear if this shift towards less familiar techniques is widely accepted in the orthopaedic community. This study aimed to provide an exploration of understanding and acceptance of AI use in research among orthopaedic surgeons. Methods. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out on a sample of 12 orthopaedic surgeons. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. Results. The four intersecting themes identified were: 1) validity in traditional research, 2) confusion around the definition of AI, 3) an inability to validate AI research, and 4) cautious optimism about AI research. Underpinning these themes is the notion of a validity heuristic that is strongly rooted in traditional research teaching and embedded in medical and surgical training. Conclusion. Research involving AI sometimes challenges the accepted traditional evidence-based framework. This can give rise to confusion among orthopaedic surgeons, who may be unable to confidently validate findings. In our study, the impact of this was mediated by cautious optimism based on an ingrained validity heuristic that orthopaedic surgeons develop through their medical training. Adding to this, the integration of AI into everyday life works to reduce suspicion and aid acceptance. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):696–703

Aims

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the highest level of evidence used to inform patient care. However, it has been suggested that the quality of randomization in RCTs in orthopaedic surgery may be low. This study aims to describe the quality of randomization in trials included in systematic reviews in orthopaedic surgery.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons’ reported change of treatment preference in response to the results and conclusion from a randomized contolled trial (RCT) and to study patterns of change between subspecialties and nationalities.

Objectives

Evidence -based medicine (EBM) is designed to inform clinical decision-making within all medical specialties, including orthopaedic surgery. We recently published a pilot survey of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) membership and demonstrated that the adoption of EBM principles is variable among Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. The objective of this study was to conduct a broader international survey of orthopaedic surgeons to identify characteristics of research studies perceived as being most influential in informing clinical decision-making.

Background. Information about low back pain (LBP) and help to support patients' self-management are recommended in the majority of guidelines for LBP management. However, the delivery of patient information and advice can be time consuming, and with short available consultation times for general practitioners (GPs), new methods to support the delivery of sufficient patient information is called for. Purpose. To identify general practitioners' perspectives on recommending online information to patients with LBP. Methods. Danish GPs varying in age and professional interests were recruited to interviewing in their practices (their working environment). The interviews were based on a semi-structured interview guide, based on a value-led method, and inspired by think aloud methods,. Results. Eight 60-Minutes interviews were conducted. For GPs to recommend online LBP information, it is essential to target the information to their patients. GPs expressed the possible advantages by involving both healthcare professionals and patients in the development of the online information material by aligning the content with the face-to-face delivered information. Furthermore, the content should be guideline concordant. However, GPs expressed that some patients had problems with accessing and understanding health-related LBP information. Conclusion. When developing online information, the content should be supported by evidence and it is important to involve patients' and GPs' preferences in the design process. Consequently, including the elements in evidence-based medicine. However, GPs do not consider online information material to be suited to all. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Funded by ARs' Honour in Medical Research from Magda and Svend Aage Friederichs Memorial Fund and the Novo Nordic Foundation

Introduction. This analysis aims to provide an update of the Level-IV Partners Arthroplasty Registry (PAR), a quality-improvement initiative and research data repository. Methods. The Harris Joint Registry was founded in 1969 and has since expanded to become the Partners Arthroplasty Registry (PAR). Today, the PAR captures data on total hip and total knee arthroplasties conducted at seven hospitals in Massachusetts. Over time, data has been sourced through independent collection at a single hospital, retrospective sourcing through the Research Patient Data Registry (RPDR), and currently through the Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW). Various statistical methods analyzed changing trends of care provided to patients across affiliated institutions. PROMs collected in the PAR are the PROMIS Physical Function and Global Health Short Forms, the HOOS and KOOS. The registry is an associate member of ISAR and will incorporate the international implant library. Results. The PAR contains demographic, implant-specifics, and radiographic data for 45,645 primary arthroplasties and 8,400 revision surgeries from 1998 to 2018. The average recorded Charlson Comorbidity Index is 0.98. Average length of stay prior to home or care facility discharge decreased from 5.00 days in 2001 to 3.00 days in 2018. The average 30-day and 90-day mortality rates for 2018 were 0. 18% and 0.28%, respectively. Home discharge increased from 30.1% to 79.0% from 2001–2018. The values for these parameters are varied across the seven sites. Conclusion. The PAR can be used to develop best practices, analyze health-care economics, and promote evidence-based medicine. We are also developing a platform for registry development that can be exported by other hospitals that utilize an Epic-based record system. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. The direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is now widely used. A recent unpublished survey of 1000 AAHKS members found that over half currently used a DAA technique and that most users felt the DAA was financially beneficial to their practice. Conversely, non-DAA users felt that their surgical volume had decreased. An online survey of Hip Society (HS) members was done to determine member's preference for a surgical approach and opinions regarding the DAA. Methods. 71 of 112 active and senior HS members (63%) responded to this 20-question survey. Results. The survey found that only 17% of respondents had trained in an anterior approach during residency, but that half (35 respondents) had used this approach in practice at one time. Subsequently, 43% of those 35 DAA users had abandoned it. The DAA learning curve was estimated at over 50 cases by 47% of respondents. Only 23% of 71 respondents answered “yes” to the statement “Do you believe that evidence-based medicine proves significant benefits over risks of the DAA THA versus other approaches?” Financial factors were common reasons for beginning to use the technique including accommodating patient requests and preventing the loss of patients to other DAA surgeons. Conclusion. 15 years after the emergence of “minimally invasive” DAA THA, a literature review finds that only one small (44 patient) clinical trial with >1-year follow-up showed small early functional benefits but with longer average surgical times and higher blood loss. If the DAA procedure has minimal benefits, is more difficult to perform with a high complication rate (LFCN injury, femoral fracture and loosening) in the hands of non-specialists and has a long learning curve (that caused a significant percentage of HS DAA users to abandon it), then financial factors must be the main reasons for its popularity. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Introduction and aims. The International Orthopaedic community is eagerly adopting Robotic Assisted Arthroplasty (RAA) technology. However, the evidence for the benefits of this technology are unproven and at best equivocal. This study is a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of all published research in the field of RAA. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted to retrieve all peer-reviewed, English language, publications studying robot- assisted hip and knee arthroplasty between 1992 and 2017. Review articles were excluded. Articles were classified by type of study and level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence System. The number of citations, authorship, year of publication, journal of publication, and country and institution of origin were also recorded for each publication. Results. We identified 73 original studies published since 1992 in the field of RAA. The procedures reported were total hip and total knee replacement, and uni-compartmental knee replacement. Publications originated from 17 countries and 117 organisations. Fifty percent of studies identified were published in the last 5 years at an average of 7 publications per year, compared to an average of 2.7 publications per year from 1992 to 2012. Thirty-six percent of original studies were of level 5 evidence or below, with a preponderance of biomechanical and cadaveric studies. The most cited paper was Bargar, Bauer and Borner's original RCT proving efficacy and safety of the Robodoc system for total hip replacement. Most publications originated in the US (36.9%) and more than 15% were published in the Journal of Arthroplasty. Conclusions. Analysis of publication patterns in robotic orthopaedic surgery allow us a unique insight into the qualities, characteristics, clinical innovations and advances in the evolution of RAA research

Aging of Population – Baby Boomers, Millennials, Generation X. Burden of TJR in USA – Estimated ∼ 4 million US adults currently live with TKR (4.2% of the population aged 50 or older) – Females (4.8%); Males (3.4%). Prevalence increased with increasing age. Estimated lifetime risk of primary TKR – 7.0% for males, 9.5% for females. Changes in Resident Education – Resident Work Hour Restrictions. Changes in Fellowship Education – Presumed shortage of fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons, BWH Data. Changes in Healthcare Paradigm – Hospital – Margin/Mission, Efficiency, Contribution Margin, Ambulatory Centers. Academic/Community Practice – Revenue Driven, Diminished Education/Research Incentive. Arthroplasty Education – Time Restraints, Surgical Volume, Exposure to Options – CR/CS TKR, Revision TKR/THR, Femoral Cementing in THR. “Mind's EYE”. CME Training/Evidence-Based Medicine. Learn Basic Principles of Arthroplasty. “Be Neither the First nor Last to Embrace a New Technology”. “Always Act in the Best Interests of Your Patient”

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently identified musculoskeletal care as a major global health issue in the developing world. However, little is known about the quality and trends of orthopaedic research in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of orthopaedic research in low-income countries (LIC). The primary objective was to determine the quality and publication parameters of studies performed in LIC. Secondary objectives sought to provide recommendations for successful strategies to implement research endeavors in LIC. A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching MEDLINE (1966-November 2014), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify peer-reviewed orthopaedic research conducted in LICs. The PRISMA guidelines for performing a systematic review were followed. LIC were defined by the WHO and by the World Bank as countries with gross national income per capita equal or less than 1045US$. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies performed in a LIC, (2) conducted on patients afflicted by an orthopaedic condition, and (3) evaluated either an orthopaedic intervention or outcome. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to objectively rate the overall methodological quality of each study. Additional data collected from these studies included the publication year, journal demographics, orthopaedic subspecialty and authors' country of origin. A total of 1,809 articles were screened and 277 studies met our inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight percent of studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality evidence according to the GRADE score and consisted mostly of small case series or case reports. Bangladesh and Nepal were the only two LIC with national journals and produced the highest level of research evidence. Foreign researchers produced over 70% of the studies with no collaboration with local LIC researchers. The most common subspecialties were trauma (42%) and paediatrics (14%). The 3 most frequent countries where the research originated were the United States (42%), United Kingdom (11%), and Canada (8%). The 3 most common locations where research was conducted were Haiti (18%), Afghanistan (14%), and Malawi (7%). The majority of orthopaedic studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality and performed by foreign researchers with little local collaboration. In order to promote the development of global orthopaedic surgery and research in LIC, we recommend (1) improving the collaboration between researchers in developed and LIC, (2) promoting the teaching of higher-quality and more rigorous research methodology through shared partnerships, (3) improving the capacity of orthopaedic research in developing nations through national peer-reviewed journals, and (4) dedicated subsections in international orthopaedic journals to global healthcare research

The promotion and practice of evidence-based medicine necessitates a critical evaluation of medical literature including the “gold standard” of randomised clinical trials. Recent studies have examined the quality of randomised clinical trials in various surgical specialties, but no study has focused on pediatric orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to assess and describe the quality of randomised clinical trials published in the last ten years in journals with high clinical impact in pediatric orthopaedics. All of the randomised clinical trials in pediatric orthopedics published in five well-recognised journals between 1995–2005 were reviewed using the Detsky Quality Assessment Scale. The mean percentage score on the Detsky Scale was 53% (95% CI: 46%–60%). Only seven (19%) of the articles satisfied the threshold for a satisfactory level of methodologic quality (Detsky > 75%). The majority of randomised clinical trials in pediatric orthopedics that are published in well-recognised, peer-reviewed journals demonstrate substantial deficiencies in methodologic quality. Particular areas of weakness include inadequate rigor and reporting of randomization methods, use of inappropriate or poorly-described outcome measures, inadequate description of inclusion and exclusion criteria and inappropriate statistical analysis. Further efforts are necessary to improve the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in this field in order to avoid inadvertent misinformation of the clinical community

Background. The focus on evidence-based medicine has led to calls for increased levels of evidence in surgical journals. The purpose of the present study was to review the levels of evidence in articles published in the foot and ankle literature and to assess changes in the level of evidence over a decade. Methods. All articles from the years 2000 and 2010 in Foot and Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Surgery, and all foot and ankle articles from JBJS A and JBJS B were analysed. Animal, cadaveric, basic science, editorials, surveys, letters to Editor and correspondence were excluded. Articles were ranked by a five-point level of evidence scale, according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Results. A total of 379 articles were analysed from a total of 42 different countries. The kappa value for the inter-observer reliability showed very good agreement between the reviewers for types of evidence (κ = 0.785 (P< 0.01)) and excellent agreement for levels of evidence (κ = 0.846 (P< 0.01)). Between 2000 and 2010 the percentage of high level evidence (Levels I and II) increased (5.2% to 10.3%), and low level evidence (levels III, IV and V) decreased (94.8% to 89.7%) (p=0.09). The most frequent type of study was Therapeutic. The JBJS A produced the highest proportion of high-level evidence. The USA and UK were the highest producer of articles. The number of rest-of-world articles (non USA or UK) increased from 40.5% to 46.4% between 2000 and 2010. Conclusion. There has been a trend towards higher levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery over a decade but the differences did not reach statistical significance

Background. The recent emphasis on using “evidence based medicine” for decision-making in patient care has prompted many publishers to mention the level of evidence of articles in their journals. The “quality” of a journal may thus be reflected by the proportion of articles with high levels of evidence and assist it achieve citations and therefore an Impact Factor. The purpose of this study was to survey published Foot and Ankle literature to evaluate changes in the level of evidence over ten years. Methods. Articles from Foot and Ankle International, JBJS Br, JBJS Am, Foot and Foot and Ankle Surgery were used. We looked at the years 2000 and 2010 and ranked the articles by a five-point level of evidence scale, according to guidelines from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. 498 articles were ranked. Studies of animals, studies of cadavera, basic-science articles were excluded. Results. For both years 2000 and 2010 combined, 63.5% of the articles were therapeutic, 25.5% were prognostic, 10.6% were diagnostic, and 0.8% were economic. In 2000 the ratings were 1.3% as Level I, 5.8% as Level II, 11.9% as Level III, 44.7% as Level IV and 36.3% as level V. In 2010 the ratings were 2.9% as Level I, 9.6% as Level II, 15.4% as Level III, 38.2% as Level IV and 33.8% as level V. Conclusion. The literature in foot and ankle surgery has responded to the demand for more evidence-based medicine with an increase in level I and II papers but the rate of change has been slow. The majority of evidence remains in the level IV and V

INTRODUCTION. There is a growing interest in surgical variables that are controlled by the orthopaedic surgeon, including lower leg alignment and soft tissue balancing. Since more tight control over these factors is associated with improved outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), several computer navigation systems have been developed. Many meta-analyses showed that mechanical axis accuracy and component positioning are improved using computer navigation and one may therefore expect better outcomes with computer navigation but studies showing this are lacking. Therefore, a systematic review with meta-analysis was performed on studies comparing functional outcomes of computer-navigated and conventional TKA. Goals of this study were to (I) assess outcomes of computer-navigated versus conventional TKA and (II) to stratify these results by the surgical variables the systems aim to control. METHODS. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed for comparative studies reporting functional outcomes of computer-navigated versus conventional TKA. Knee Society Scores (KSS) Total were most often reported and studies reporting this outcome score were included. Outcomes of computer-navigated and conventional TKA were compared (I) in all studies and (II) stratified by navigation systems that only controlled for lower leg alignment or systems that controlled for lower leg alignment and soft tissue balancing. Level of evidence was determined using the adjusted Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine tool and methodological quality was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Outcomes were reported in mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals [Lower Bound 95%, Upper Bound 95%]. RESULTS. Twenty-eight studies reported KSS Total outcomes in 3,504 patients undergoing computer-navigated or conventional TKA. Fifteen studies were evidence level I, five studies level II and eight studies level III. Study quality varied between low and high with most studies having high methodological quality. Patients reported better outcomes following computer navigated TKA than conventional TKA (MD 2.86 [0.96, 4.76], p=0.003), which was both seen at short-term follow-up of six months and one year (MD 5.20 [3.41, 7.00] and MD 8.46 [0.65, 16.28], respectively) and at mid-term follow-up (≥4 years) (MD 2.65 [0.96, 4.76]) (Figure 1). In studies that used computer navigation for controlling lower leg alignment, no difference in functional outcomes was seen between computer-navigated and conventional TKA (MD 0.66 [−2.06, 3.38], p=0.63, Figure 2). However, in studies that used computer navigation for controlling lower leg alignment and soft tissue balancing, patients reported superior functional outcomes following computer-navigate over conventional TKA (MD 4.84 [1.61, 8.07], p=0.003, Figure 3). CONCLUSION. This is the first meta-analysis showing superior functional outcomes following computer-navigated over conventional TKA. Stratifying results by variables the systems control, superiority in functional outcomes following computer-navigated over conventional TKA were only seen in systems that controlled soft tissue balancing. This suggests that soft tissue balancing plays an important role in short-term outcomes of TKA. Manually controlling all these surgical variables can be difficult for the orthopaedic surgeon and findings in this study suggest that computer navigation may help managing these multiple variables and improve outcomes. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).