Introduction. Positive expectations can increase compliance with treatment and realistic expectations may reduce postoperative dissatisfaction. Recently there are articles regarding expectations of patients from their TKA in western literature and only few articles based on Korean populations which don't encompass the whole spectrum of expectations in Korean patients. In all those articles based on pre-operative expectation, results were applied to whole expectation category uniformly not differentially. We aimed to document the pre-operative expectations in Korean patients undergoing total knee replacement using an established survey form and to determine whether expectations were influenced by socio-demographic factors and socio-demographic factors influences expectation items in particular category uniformly or differentially. Methods. Expectations regarding 19 items in the Knee Replacement Expectation Survey form were investigated in 228 patients scheduled for total knee replacement. The levels and distribution patterns of individual and summated expectation of five expectation categories; relief from pain, baseline activity, high flexion activity, social activity and psychological wellbeing, constructed from the 19 items were assessed. Univariate analyses and Binary logistic regression were performed and analyzed to examine the association of expectations with the socio-demographic factors. Results. The top five expectations among individual items were: improvement in walking ability, relief from pain, ascending and descending stairs, improvement in changing position and improvement in daily activity, respectively. Among the five expectation categories, relief from pain was ranked the highest, followed by restoration of baseline activity, ability to perform high flexion activities, psychological well-being and ability to participate in social activities respectively. Conclusion. There was a high expectation of restoration of walking ability, relief from pain and high flexion activity, whereas the expectation was more variable for psychological well-being and social activities. An age of < 65years, being employed, male gender, previous participation in high level sports activity, less income were all found to be significantly associated with higher expectations in social activity category whereas in baseline category, pain relief category and psychological well being category there are no significantly associated socio-demographic factors found, which shows these are the expectation items/categories which don't depend on socio-demographic factors and are highly expected by all patients undergoing TKA in our study. We also found that Socio-demographic factors influence individual expectation items in particular category differentially not uniformly hence results of individual items don't reflect the whole category or vice versa

The number of revision total hip arthroplasties (THA) is increasing. This procedure is associated with a higher complication rate than primary THA, and so it is important for patients to have realistic expectations. The aim of this systematic review was to gather and summarise the available evidence on patients’ expectations following revision THA. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science from inception to December 2021. Methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) study quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. The search strategy generated 3132 references of which 4 articles met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality scores ranged from 7–10. Patients have high expectations concerning future walking ability, pain and implant longevity. Implant longevity expectations vary according to the longevity of the primary implant. A significant positive correlation was found between fulfilled expectations of pain and walking ability and patient satisfaction (r = .46 – .47). Only one study assessed fulfilment of patient expectations. Great variability was seen in operationalisation and assessment of expectations. Patients undergoing revision THA appear to have high expectations with regards to future outcomes. Whilst results are promising, there is a paucity of high-quality data in this area. Further research is needed, which places emphasis on developing a sound theoretical framework for expectations, allowing for the consistent implementation of valid measurement tools

Purpose. To explore the relationship in terms of time scale between pre-operative expectations and postoperative outcomes and satisfaction after Hallux valgus surgery. Methods. A patient derived questionnaire was developed and 30 patients aged 19 to 67 were included undergoing primary hallux valgus correction with a first metatarsal osteotomy and distal soft tissue release. Patients were asked pre-operatively to quantify their expected time scale for improvement in pain, ability to walk unaided, ability to drive, routine foot wear and foot feeling normal at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months following surgery, and to indicate their confidence in achieving this result. Patients recorded postoperative outcomes achieved at number of weeks. Ordinal logistic regression multivariate modelling was used to examine predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Results. 90% of the patients were able to walk unaided and drive before or around the expected time scale at an average of five weeks' time. Persistent pain subsided at an average of two weeks post operatively which led to high satisfaction Although differences between patients' expectation and achievement were minimal at 6 weeks post-operatively, there was some discrepancy at 3 months, with patient expectations far exceeding achievement. The least satisfactory outcome was normal feeling of foot at six months follow up. There were significant correlations between failure to achieve expectations and the importance patients attached to recovery. Conclusions. This study underlines the importance of taking preoperative expectations into account to obtain an informed choice on the basis of the patient's preferences. Patients' pre-operative expectations of surgical outcome exceed their functional achievement but satisfaction remains high if pain control and ability to walk unaided is achieved early after hallux valgus corrective surgery

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has high rates of patient satisfaction; however patient expectations for recreational and sporting activities are not always met. Our study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict whether patient expectations for sporting or recreational activity are met 12 months following THA. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively from 2015-2018 at one private hospital in Sydney. Age, gender, postcode, weight, and height were recorded preoperatively. Included participants underwent primary THA by one of the investigating surgeons. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed with an expectation fulfilment score used as the primary outcome variable. Preoperative predictor variables included: age, gender, BMI, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Oxford Hip Score, Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). 1019 participants were eligible and included. 13% reported that preoperative expectations of sport or recreation were not met at 12 months. Younger age, lower preoperative EQ VAS, and higher BMI were associated with failed expectations on multivariable analysis. Odds of failed expectations increased by 2% for every one year younger in age (OR= 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00, p=.048), by 2% for every one point lower on EQ VAS (OR=0.98, 95% CI = 0.98 to 0.99, p=.002), and by 4% for every one-point increase in BMI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.09, p=.042). Failure to have expectations met for sporting or recreational activity was associated with younger age, poorer general health, and high BMI. With a rise in younger patients who likely have higher physical demands, a tailored preoperative education is preferable to generic models to better manage patient expectations. Younger age, higher BMI, and poorer health may predict unmet expectations for sport and recreation after THA. Tailored education in these groups should be considered

Clinical decision-making is often based on evidence of outcome after a specific treatment. Surgeons and patients may, have different perceptions and expectations of what to achieve following a Total Hip Replacement (THR). Several studies have shown that unfulfilled expectations are a principal source of patient dissatisfaction and patients are typically overly optimistic with regards to expected outcomes following surgery. Published data on clinical and functional outcomes show that persistence of symptoms, such as pain, and failure to return to preoperative levels of function are normal. To measure patient's expectations we undertook prospective study reviewing patients' expectations in 1800 THRs over a 21-year period (1997–2018). Of the whole cohort, 48.98% patients reported they wanted a THR to overcome unbearable pain. 11.75 % wanted a THR to be able to walk without a limp. 9.69% wanted to a THR to increase walk endurance. 61.97% reported it was extremely important to decrease pain following a THR. In 2001, the most important reason for a THR reported by patients was to relieve unbearable pain and this remained the same most important reason in 2018. This result was also statistically significant with a p-value of 0.001. 80.36% reported they anticipated ‘no pain’ after recovery from a THR, 16.75% reported they anticipated ‘some pain’ and 2.89% reported they anticipated ‘extreme pain’ following a THR. 74.71% reported it was extremely important to increase their ability to undertake normal activities. 22.06% reported it was very important, 2.40% reported it was moderately important, 0.55% slightly important and 0.28% reported it was not all to important to increase their ability to undertake normal activity. In conclusion patients' want to reduce their pain, walk normally and increase their level activities. Differences in expectation fulfilment may be due to unrealistic expectations. To achieve optimal outcome managing patient expectations is vital

Purpose and background. Understanding patients’ expectations of back pain treatment can help improve their experiences, adherence and outcomes. Patients typically expect a diagnosis and exercise-based physiotherapy, but often undervalue the role of psychological factors. This study explored patients’ expectations of outpatient physiotherapy treatment for back pain in primary care. Methods and Results. The design, a secondary analysis of a qualitative cross-sectional study, involved 25 patients (13M:12F), aged 20–81, referred with low back pain (duration 7 weeks to 9 years). This sample did not include patients with serious spinal pathologies, known psychological disorders, or those unable to communicate without assistance. Face-to-face interviews were undertaken in patients’ homes, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the six stages of thematic analysis outlined by Braun and Clarke. Patients expected a caring clinician and a strong therapeutic relationship, where they felt believed, openly communicated with and valued as an individual. Most patients expected a diagnosis and credible explanation for their pain. There was an almost equal split between those keen to take responsibility for their care and those who felt this was the clinicians’ role. Expectations of passive therapies were slightly higher in this study than existing research. Most patients were realistic about outcomes and expected treatment to reduce their pain, but not cure it. Conclusion. A positive experience mattered most to patients, valuing the relational aspects of their care more than the clinical content provided. Patients saw back pain through a biomedical lens, and most failed to recognise the role of psychosocial factors in their condition or treatment. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. Funding for primary data: Arthritis Research UK (now Versus Arthritis)

Patient expectations and their fulfilment are an important factor in determining patient-reported outcome and satisfaction of hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to examine the expectations of patients undergoing THR and TKR, and to identify differences in expectations, predictors of high expectations and the relationship between the fulfilment of expectations and patient-reported outcome measures. During the study period, patients who underwent 346 THRs and 323 TKRs completed an expectation questionnaire, Oxford score and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) score pre-operatively. At one year post-operatively, the Oxford score, SF-12, patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment were assessed. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed. Improvements in mobility and daytime pain were the most important expectations in both groups. Expectation level did not differ between THR and TKR. Poor Oxford score, younger age and male gender significantly predicted high pre-operative expectations (p < 0.001). The level of pre-operative expectation was not significantly associated with the fulfilment of expectations or outcome. THR better met the expectations identified as important by patients. TKR failed to meet expectations of kneeling, squatting and stair climbing. High fulfilment of expectation in both THR and TKR was significantly predicted by young age, greater improvements in Oxford score and high pre-operative mental health scores. The fulfilment of expectations was highly correlated with satisfaction

Significance. In spite of evidence that total knee replacement (TKR) surgery is effective, numerous studies have demonstrated that approximately 20 percent of patients who have undergone TKR surgery are not satisfied. This relatively high rate of patients who are not satisfied is the result of unmet patient expectations. The strongest predictor of dissatisfaction after TKR is unmet expectations (RR = 10.7, Bourne, Chesworth, et al, 2010). This is confirmed by Dunbar, Richardson, and Robertsson (2013): “Unmet expectation seems to be a major cause of unsatisfactory outcomes and satisfaction is most strongly correlated with relief of pain, followed by improvement in physical function.” Hypothesis: One year post-operative pain relief and activity level expectations can be measured pre-operatively and used for shared decision making. Methods. A web–based system for prospectively collecting patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been developed. The data set for total hip/knee replacement surgery includes: (1) European quality of life, EQ-5D; Oxford Hip Score/Oxford Knee Score; (3) Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS); and (4) Pain Likert Scale (PLS). The EQ-5D was selected as the health related quality of life (HRQL) general outcome measure because it has been adopted by multiple international joint replacement registries (Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, United Kingdom National Joint Registry). The EQ-5D can be used to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for economic and/or comparative effectiveness analyses. The OHS/OKS questionnaires are used by the United Kingdom National Joint Registry and the New Zealand Joint Registry. The LEAS and PLS are used to measure patient's expectations for pain relief and functional improvement by asking patients to report their pre-operative pain and activity level before surgery and asking patients to report their pain and activity level expectations one year after surgery. Results. The LEAS change (one-year post-operative activity level minus pre-operative activity level) mean and standard deviation are 1.45 and 3.18. The LEAS minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is 1.59. The mean LEAS change is 0.91 MCIDs. The PLS change (one-year post-operative pain score minus pre-operative pain score) mean and standard deviation are −4.57 and 2.85. The PLS MCID is 1.43. The mean PLS change is −3.2 MCIDs. The z statistic for expected change is z = (Δ. expect. – μ. Δ. )/σ. Δ. The probability of realizing an expected activity level change greater than or equal to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 is 68%, 56%, 43%, 31%, 21%, 13%, 7.6%, 4.0%, 2.0%, 0.9%, and 0.4%, respectively. The probability of realizing an expected pain change greater than or equal to 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 is 95%, 90%, 82%, 71%, 58%, 44%, 31%, 20%, 11%, 6.0%, and 2.8%, respectively. Conclusions. Dramatic improvement in activity level is unlikely. However, 86 percent of patients can expect clinically significant pain relief defined by pain relief greater than the MCID. Shared decision making should discuss unrealistic expectations prior to proceeding with surgery

Abstract. Introduction. Recent research has questioned the role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear leading to the development of treatment recommendations for these patients. There is a clear need to understand patient perceptions of living with a meniscal tear in order to plan future research and treatment guidelines. Aims. To explore the experiences and expectations of treatment of young patients with a meniscal tear of the knee. Methodology. Ten participants diagnosed with a meniscal tear were recruited from the METRO cohort study using a purposive sampling strategy. These patients underwent semi-sructured interviews between April and May 2021. Thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts and generate key themes in order to describe the data. Results. Themes identified relate to the broad areas of: the effect of symptoms, the expericne of the clinical consultation and the experience of the treatment modality undertaken. Meniscal tears have a profound impact on pain and many patients experience effects on their family and financial life in addition to physical symptoms. Participants expected the majority of their management to occur in secondary care and most thought surgery would be a definitive treatment, while the effectiveness of physiotherapy could not be guaranteed as it would not fix the physical tear. Conclusion. Patient experience of meniscal tear may not correspond with current available clinical evidence. Clinicians should consider the common misconceptions highlighted in this study when conducting a consultation and pre-empt them to optimally manage patient expectations

Purpose. Patient expectations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be managed through education. E-learning is the application of information technology to education. Providing information to patients at the place and time of their choosing, e-learning has the potential to broaden the reach of existing services for patients. This study evaluated whether an e-learning tool could affect whether patients felt their expectations were met and whether they were satisfied with surgery one year following primary TKA. Method. We recruited consecutive patients with osteoarthritis and randomized them to either standard patient education (n=207), or to our standard patient education plus a new e-learning tool (n=209). Preoperative measures were completed following the patients’ Pre-Admission clinic (PAC) visit and prior to accessing the e-learning tool. Postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were completed at six weeks, three months and one year after TKA. We used the Postoperative Expectation Questionnaire to measure the degree to which patient expectations had been met and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) question to measure patient satisfaction at one year postoperative. We collected several PROMs for descriptive purposes including: new Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS); (Pre-Op and Post-Op versions), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, and the Social Role Participation Questionnaire (SRPQ). Results. Both groups were similar with respect to their preoperative PROMs. Preoperative patient satisfaction was low, with few patients satisfied with their present state prior to TKA and similar between groups (14% intervention group, 11% control group). At one year postoperatively, the risk that expectations of patients were not met was 21.8% in the control group and 21.4% in the intervention group for a risk difference of 1.3% (95% CI −7.8% to 10.4%, p = 0.78). The proportion of patients satisfied with their TKA at one year postoperative was similar in the intervention group 78.6% and the control group 78.2%, and the risk difference 0.6% (95% CI −8.4% to 9.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.78). At one year postoperative we found significant postoperative between-group differences in favour of the control group for the new KSS symptoms score and the functional activities score. We also found that control patients had less anxiety, lower scores for rumination, magnification, and helplessness than intervention patients on the PCS. Conclusion. Patients randomized to the e-learning tool had significantly better KSS symptom scores and functional activities scores as well as lower anxiety and helplessness scores but they did not have a reduced risk of expectations not being met or an improved overall satisfaction with their TKA

This study was performed to assess the relationship between patients’ pre-operative symptoms and their expectations at the time of revision hip arthroplasty. The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index) scale for osteoarthritis of the hip and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) general health status scale have both been validated for the assessment of the outcome of hip arthroplasty. We prospectively assessed 60 patients using these scales as well as the “expectation WOMAC” that asked the patients to estimate how they expected to feel 6 months after revision hip replacement. All the questions were completed prior to informed consent, and were scored form 1 to 5 with increasing severity with a Likert scale. The maximum possible scores for pain, stiffness and difficulty with physical activity were therefore 25, 10 and 85 respectively. The mean preoperative WOMAC score for pain was 13.4 (CI 12.2.-14.6), for stiffness 5.9 (CI 5.6-6.2) and for physical activity 50.9 (CI 47.2-54.6) The mean expectation WOMAC scores for these modalities were 7.4 (CI 6.2-8.6), 3.5 (CI 3.0-4.0) and 28.1 (CI 24.0-32.2.) respectively. Although there was a wide spread of expectations, we were unable to find any significant correlation between the patients’ preoperative pain and The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom. stiffness levels and their expectations for pain and stiffness after revision hip arthroplasty. There was however a statistical association between their preoperative difficulty with physical activity and their expectations for physical activity (r=0.38; p=0.02) There was no significant correlation between the SF-36 scores and the patients’ expectations. The expectations of patients awaiting revision hip replacements are high, and do not appear to be closely related to their level of pre-operative disability. Even patients with severe symptoms have high expectations that in some cases may be unrealistic. The use of the “expectation WOMAC” may help us to identify such patients, and to improve patient education and satisfaction

There is a paucity of information regarding patient rated expectations of surgery and measures of satisfaction with surgery in terms of specific outcome measures such as pain. The aim of this study was to investigate patient expectations of surgery and short and long term satisfaction with the outcome of decompressive surgery in terms of pain, function, disability, general health. Eighty-four patients undergoing spinal stenosis surgery were recruited into this study. On recruitment into the study patients were also asked to rate their expectations of improved in pain, general health, function etc. In addition at each review stage patients were asked to rate their satisfaction in improvement of these key outcome measures. These demonstrated that patients had very high expectations of recovery particularly in terms of pain and function and that patients were confident of achieving this recovery (76.8%) confident of a good result. Levels of satisfaction however, varied considerably. 41% of subjects were 50% satisfied with the outcome, whilst 30% were dissatisfied. Most patients felt that they had made the right decision to have surgery although the surgery had only achieved 43.4% ± 37.8 of the outcome they had expected. Examination of patient’s expectations of and satisfaction with surgery revealed that frequently patients had unrealistic expectations of their surgery and as a consequence tended to have lower levels of satisfaction

There is increasing knowledge regarding the functional outcome of patients following posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions of the spine. There is less known regarding the expectations patients have for spinal surgery and how that may relate to commonly reported surgical outcome measures. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the results of elective lumbar spinal surgery as it relates to patient expectations for outcome. and outcome as quantified by both physician reported outcome and patient derived generic and disease-specific measures. Patient expectations for surgery were evaluated in one hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions (single institution, two surgeons). SF-36+Oswestry disability was quantified preoperatively, and serially postoperatively. Preoperative expectations (pain relief, sleep, recreational, ADL, work return) were documented and postoperative expectations quantified at time of anticipated maximal medical improvement (6mos decompressions,1yr with fusions). Mean preoperative SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were 3.4 and 1.2 S.D. below age/gender matched Canadian norms. Although patients reported improvements in SF-36+Oswestry scores following surgery, mean SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were still 2 and 1.5 S.D. below norms. Mean Oswestry disability improved from 48.7%±1.7% to 23.1±1.9%. Expectations for surgery were met in 81%(responders:143/155). Of 19%(27/143) where expectations were not met, 6/27 have either nonunion, technical, or medical factors. There was no difference in mean age, gender, comorbidity, procedure type and follow-up comparing patients where expectations were met to those that were not. Patients where expectations were not met reported lower preoperative SF-36 (GH and VT) domain scores (p=0.02 and 0.04, respectively), however, preoperative Oswestry, SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were not significantly different. Patients were less satisfied if they had prior lumbar surgery (p=0.02) or involved in WCB/litigation (p< 0.001). We note 15%(21/143) where expectations were not met and there were no apparent surgical or medical confounds to account. There are likely other factors that may influence patient perception and expectation for treatment which requires further study

Purpose: Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of elective lumbar spinal surgery as it relates to patient expectations for outcome and outcome as quantified by patient derived generic and disease specific measures. Methods: Prospectively collected patient derived generic health status (SF-36) and disease specific outcome measures (Oswestry) were quantified in all patients prior to surgery, and at serial postoperative clinical follow-ups. Patient expectations for their surgery were also measured; (pain relief, sleep, recreational and daily activities of living, return to work). Postoperatively, patients completed a questionnaire regarding the results of their spinal surgery as it related to meeting their expectations. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to evaluate for factors that influenced the results of surgery relating to patient expectations. Results: Between 1998 and 2002 one hundred and forty three consecutive patients were evaluated. Average age was 52 (range 18–84). Diagnosis was disc herniation 43%, spondylitic spondylolisthesis 10%, degenerative spondylolisthesis 30%, spondylosis 6%, other 11%. The mean preoperative SF-36 mental component and physical component scores were 42.1 and 22.3 respectively (1.2 and 3.4 standard deviations below age and gender matched norms). Postoperative SF-36 scores were 48.1 and 38.6. The mean Oswestry disability scores were 48.7% preoperatively vs. 23.1% postoperatively. 81% (116/143) had their expectations met. Of the 19% (27 patients) who did not meet their expectations, they reported lower preoperative SF-36 general health and vitality domain scores. Patients were also less likely to have their expectations met if they had prior lumbar surgery, were involved in worker compensation or litigation. Patients who reported either back or back > leg symptoms were less satisfied than patients who presented with predominantly leg symptoms. Conclusions: Patient factors inclusive of mental, (as measured by general health perception and vitality), physical (predominance of leg vs back pain), and social (presence of compensation, litigation), all contribute to patient satisfaction and outcomes following lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions

Introduction & aims. Satisfaction following total knee replacement (TKR) surgery remains suboptimal at around 80%. Prediction of factors influencing satisfaction may help manage expectations and thus improve satisfaction. We investigated preoperative variables that estimate the probability of achieving a successful surgical outcome following TKR in several outcomes important to patients. Method. 9 pre-operative variables (easily obtained on initial consultation) of 591 unilateral TKRs were selected for univariant then multivariant analyses. These variables included Oxford Knee Score (OKS), age, sex, BMI, ASA score, pain score, mobility aids, SF12 PCS & SF12 MCS. Using the relative predictive strengths of these variables we modeled the probabilities a successful result would be achieved for 6 patient reported outcomes at 3 and 12 months following surgery. These were ‘Excellent/good OKS’, ‘Mild/no pain’, ‘Walking without/at first a limp’, ‘No/little interference with normal work’, ‘Kneeling with little/no difficulty’ and ‘Satisfaction with surgery’. Results. Pre-operative OKS was the most useful single predictor, having impact at three months and/or one year on all outcomes examined, except kneeling. SF12 MCS affected pain scores, pain with usual activity, and limp at three months and/or one year. At three months, BMI, age, gender, ASA and pain also influenced one or more of 6 post-operative outcomes studied. After inputting pre-operative OKS, adding other predictors did not significantly improve the statistical model. Conclusions. Our model provides objective probability estimates based on the outcomes of our previous TKRs, which we can use to give specific objective information to prospective TKR patients regarding their likely postoperative trajectory. We hope this will modulate patient expectations, assist preparation for their surgical experience and in turn increase satisfaction

Introduction. Despite the demonstrated success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and higher rates of arthritis and disability from arthritis among minorities, these populations utilize TKA at lower rates than non-Hispanic white patients in the United States. In addition, women present for TKA with more advanced disease prior to TKA than their male counterparts. In order to explore potential reasons for this, we examined the relationship between race, gender, and pre-operative expectations on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing TKA. Methods. 134 patients scheduled for primary unilateral TKA secondary to moderate to severe osteoarthritis were enrolled in this two-institution prospective study. All patient demographics were collected and recorded in an electronic data registry. In addition, patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires, including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), HSS Patient Expectation Questionnaire, Social Support Survey, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Geriatric Depression Scale and European Quality (EQ) of Life 5-Dimensions with EQ VAS were prospectively collected at 4 time points (baseline, 4–8 weeks, 9–14 months, 20–26 months postoperative). Statistical analysis was then conducted among patients of different gender and ethnic background to assess for the effect of these demographic variables on patient expectations and outcomes. Results. Female sex was associated with worse preoperative KOOS scores in symptoms (p=0.021), pain (p=0.019), and activities of daily living (p=0.020). African American race was associated with worse preoperative KOOS scores in pain (p=0.009), activities of daily living (ADLs) (p=0.004), and quality of life (QOL) (p=0.003). However, despite worse pre-operative scores, no statistically significant differences were noted in the aforementioned categories between the groups at any point post-operatively. Conclusion. Our results indicate that female and African American patients undergoing TKA presented with worse pre-operative KOOS scores compared with white male patients. However, outcomes were good among all groups postoperatively, and neither race nor gender was associated with compromised post-operative outcomes in relation to pain, ADLs or QOL. These findings may be valuable in counseling patients and surgeons regarding the value of increase utilization of TKA in these patient populations. Further study is necessary to better understand the lower utilization or later presentation observed in these populations

Aims. COVID-19 has compounded a growing waiting list problem, with over 4.5 million patients now waiting for planned elective care in the UK. Views of patients on waiting lists are rarely considered in prioritization. Our primary aim was to understand how to support patients on waiting lists by hearing their experiences, concerns, and expectations. The secondary aim was to capture objective change in disability and coping mechanisms. Methods. A minimum representative sample of 824 patients was required for quantitative analysis to provide a 3% margin of error. Sampling was stratified by body region (upper/lower limb, spine) and duration on the waiting list. Questionnaires were sent to a random sample of elective orthopaedic waiting list patients with their planned intervention paused due to COVID-19. Analyzed parameters included baseline health, change in physical/mental health status, challenges and coping strategies, preferences/concerns regarding treatment, and objective quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item scale (GAD-2)). Qualitative analysis was performed via the Normalization Process Theory. Results. A total of 888 patients responded. Better health, pain, and mood scores were reported by upper limb patients. The longest waiters reported better health but poorer mood and anxiety scores. Overall, 82% had tried self-help measures to ease symptoms; 94% wished to proceed with their intervention; and 21% were prepared to tolerate deferral. Qualitative analysis highlighted the overall patient mood to be represented by the terms ‘understandable’, ‘frustrated’, ‘pain’, ‘disappointed’, and ‘not happy/depressed’. COVID-19-mandated health and safety measures and technology solutions were felt to be implemented well. However, patients struggled with access to doctors and pain management, quality of life (physical and psychosocial) deterioration, and delay updates. Conclusion. This is the largest study to hear the views of this ‘hidden’ cohort. Our findings are widely relevant to ensure provision of better ongoing support and communication, mostly within the constraints of current resources. In response, we developed a reproducible local action plan to address highlighted issues. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):583–593

Purpose. Patient expectations influence post-treatment outcomes, both surgical and non-surgical. Existing studies evaluate the technical aspects of interventions and functional outcomes but fail to take into account patient expectations. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multi-center data aims to explore the relationship between pre-operative expectations and post-operative outcomes and satisfaction in lumbar and cervical spine surgery. The authors hypothesized that expectations dramatically affect spine patient satisfaction independent of functional outcomes. Method. Patient data from lumbar and cervical spine patients collected prospectively using a patient health survey system was analyzed. The study included patients who underwent operative intervention (decompression with or without fusion) with at least a 3-month period of follow-up. Pre-operative expectations were measured using the MODEMS expectation survey. Post-operative satisfaction and fulfillment of expectations were measured using the MODEMS satisfaction survey. Post-operative functional outcomes were measured using the ODI and SF-36. Multi-variate ordinal logistic regression modeling was used to examine predictors of post-operative satisfaction. Multi-variate linear regression modeling was used to examine predictors of functional outcomes. Results. 402 patients were included in the study. Significant predictors of increased satisfaction include: higher fulfillment of expectations regarding work (p=0.003) and pain relief (p=0.008), greater post-operative SF-36 (p=0.04), and lower pre-operative expectations regarding ability to exercise (p=0.03). Lumbar spine patients were more satisfied than cervical-spine patients. Significant predictors of better post-operative function include: higher expectations regarding sleep (p<0.0002), fulfillment of expectations regarding work (p<0.0001), sleep (p=0.03), and daily activities (p=0.02). Cervical spine patients had better functional outcomes (p=0.006). Conclusion. This study showed that pre-operative expectations and their fulfillment influence post-operative satisfaction in lumbar and cervical spine patients. This underlines the importance of taking pre-operative expectations into account in order to obtain an informed choice based on patient preferences

The burden of metastatic bone disease (MBD) in our Canadian cancer population continues to increase. MBD has a significant effect on patient morbidity, mortality, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). There are various technical options used to surgically stabilize MBD lesions, surgical decision-making is variable and largely dependent on anatomic and surgeon-based factors. There is a paucity of research examining how surgical decision-making for MBD can be modified or individualized to improve quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes, while more accurately aligning with patient-reported goals and expectations. The objective of this study was tosurvey MBD patients, support persons, physicians, and allied health care providers (HCP) with the goal of identifying 1) important contributors to HRQOL, 2) discordance in peri-operative expectations, and 3) perceived measures of success in the surgical management of MBD. This project is a longitudinal patient-engaged research initiative in MBD. A survey was developed based on HRQOL themes in the literature and based on feedback from our patient research partners. Participants were asked to identify 1) important contributors to HRQOL and 2) perceived measures of success relevant to the surgical management of MBD. Participants were asked to rank themes from ‘extremely important’ to ‘not important at all’. Using open-ended questions, participants were asked to identify areas of improvement. Responses from the open-ended questions were analyzed by an experienced qualitative researcher using conventional content analysis. Participant's demographics were calculated using descriptive statistics. Concordance or discordance of perceived measure of success was assessed via a Chi-Square test of independence. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS® software. Nine patients, seven support persons, 23 orthopaedic surgeons, 11 medical oncologists, 16 radiation oncologists, 16 nurses, and eight physiotherapists completed the survey. Regarding perceived measures of success, increased life expectancy (p Two main themes emerged around the timeliness of surgical care and the coordination of multidisciplinary care from patients and support persons. Patients and support persons expressed a sense of urgency in progressing to surgery/treatment, and frustration at perceived delays in treatment. Within coordination of care, patients and support persons would like clearer communication from the health care team. There is discordance between patient/support person goals compared to physicians/HCP goals in the surgical management of MBD. Surgical decision-making and operative techniques that minimize disease progression and improve survival are important to MBD patients. Timely access to surgery/surgical consultation and improved multidisciplinary communication is important to patients. This data suggests improved peri-operative communication and education is needed for MBD patients. Furthermore, future research evaluating how modern orthopaedic surgical techniques influence survival and disease progression in MBD is highly relevant and important to patients with MBD

Background. Various clinical outcome studies have consistently reported high dissatisfaction rate (25–33%) among the patients after hallux valgus surgery. We believe that a patient’s pre-operative expectations may play a major role in post-operative satisfaction. Patients & Methods. Questionnaires were sent to 104 patients anonymously who were given a list of reasons and asked which they hoped to improve by having the surgery. They were also asked to list, in the order of priority, goals that they hoped to achieve from surgery. Results. Overall, improvement in the ability to walk was the most important reason. Most patients also wished to reduce pain over bunion and to regain the ability to wear daily shoes. However, the expectations of patients vary significantly according to age. Patients under 40 placed more importance on their ability to wear dress shoes and improvement in functional activities. Patients between the age of 40 and 60 were more interested to improve physical appearance. Pain on other toes, and the abilities to squat and climb stairs are the main concerns for patients above 60. For the male patients, to be able to continue work is the second most important reason after improvement in walking ability. This is in contrast to the female group where the ability to wear shoes of their choice is more important. Occupation did not make any significant difference. Conclusions. This study shows that patients have different expectations that can influence the choice of operation. We believe that understanding patients preoperative expectation is crucial in achieving better patient satisfaction, and it should be an important consideration in planning appropriate operation for the patients