Background. There are limited data on the complication rates and risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who have an acute wound dehiscence after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. From 2002 to 2018, 16,134 primary TKAs were performed at a single institution. Twenty-six patients (0.1%) had a traumatic wound dehiscence within the first 30 days. Mean age was 68, 38% were female, and mean BMI was 33 kg/m2. Median time to dehiscence was 13 days. The dehiscence resulted from a fall in 22 cases, including 4 in-hospital falls (3 with femoral nerve blocks), and sudden flexion after staple removal in 4 cases. The arthrotomy was disrupted in 58%, including a complete extensor mechanism disruption in 4 knees. A surgical debridement was performed within 48 hours in 19 of 26 knees. Two-thirds were discharged on antibiotic therapy. Results. Only two knees were complicated by PJI (cumulative incidence of 11% vs. 1% in all other primary TKAs, HR 6.5, p <0.01). One patient who developed a PJI was initially treated with a bedside closure in the ER rather than surgical debridement. The second patient had a complete extensor mechanism disruption at the time of dehiscence and was treated with surgical debridement, but did not receive a subsequent course of antibiotics. There were no PJIs in any of the cases that were treated with surgical debridement and a course of antibiotics. Three knees required reoperation (cumulative incidence of reoperation was 16% at 2 years, compared to 6% in all other primary TKAs, p=0.32) including 1 two-stage exchange for PJI, 1 irrigation and debridement with component retention for PJI, and 1 revision for tibial component aseptic loosening. Conclusion. Despite having a traumatic wound dehiscence, with nearly 60% resulting in arthrotomies that exposed implants, the risk of PJI was low but significantly higher than not having a traumatic arthrotomy. We recommend urgent surgical irrigation and debridement, inspection of arthrotomy integrity, and antibiotic treatment to decrease the risk of PJI. Summary. An acute, traumatic wound dehiscence with in the first 30 days after primary TKA results in a 11% risk of infection at 2 years

Extensor mechanism disruption in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) occurs infrequently but often requires surgical intervention. We compared two cohorts undergoing extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction, one group had an extensor mechanism rupture, and the other had a recurrent ankylosed knee. Thirteen consecutive patients with extensor mechanism disruption or ankylosis after TKA were treated. Two different types of extensor mechanism allografts were used: quadriceps tendon-patella-patella tendon-tibial tubercle, and Achilles tendon allograft(Fig1). Demographic factors, diagnosis at extensor failure, Knee Society clinical rating scores, radiographs, and patient satisfaction were recorded. The average time from extensor mechanism disruption to surgery was 6.6 months (range, 1-24 months). At a mean followup of 24 months (range, 6-46 months), all patients were community ambulators. None of the patients showed a postoperative extensor lag. Average postoperative maximum flexion was 97° (90-115°) for the ruptured group and 80° (75-90) for the ankylosed grup. All patients thought their functional status had improved, and 87% were satisfied with the results of the allograft reconstruction (Fig 2, 3, 4, 5). One patient had allograft failure due to recurrent infection after re-revision for sepsis. The total extensor mechanism allograft and Achilles tendon allograft both were successful in the treatment of the failed extensor mechanism and showed promising results for the treatment of the ankylosed knee

The February 2013 Trauma Roundup. 360 . looks at: the risk of ankle fractures; absorbable implants; minimally invasive heel fracture fixation; pertrochanteric fractures; arthroplasty and intracapsular hip fractures; and extensor mechanism disruption

Chronic extensor mechanism insufficiency around TKA is a very challenging pathology to treat. An insufficient extensor mechanism negatively affects implant survival and patient outcomes. There are several risk factors for extensor mechanism disruption and the surgeon should be aware and avoid these problems in the perioperative period. In appropriately selected patients, reconstruction of the extensor mechanism is a valid option. Whole extensor mechanism and Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction of the deficient extensor mechanism have been proposed with good early published results. These reconstructions, however, are expensive and with time may stretch and lead to recurrence of an extensor lag. An alternative to allograft, is the use of Marlex mesh as popularised by Browne and Hanssen. This technique uses a knitted monofilament polypropylene mesh that is secured to the patient's native lateral tissue and covered by an appropriately dissected and distalised vastus medialis muscle. The technique can be used for both patellar and quadriceps tendon deficiencies and can be done with or without implant revision and is currently the treatment of choice at the presenter's institution. The surgeon should be aware of the complexity and limitations of these three reconstructive techniques

Introduction. Arthrofibrosis remains a persistent complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an effective early treatment, the risks and value of this procedure beyond 3 months after TKA remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of late MUAs for arthrofibrosis. Methods. From our institutional total joint registry, 82 TKAs (77 patients) who underwent MUA >3 months after primary (83%) or revision (17%) TKA were identified. Mean time to MUA was 7 months: 66% performed between 4–6 months, 18% between 7–12 months, 16% beyond 12 months. MUAs were coupled with arthroscopic assistance in 26% (12% limited lysis of adhesions, 13% formal arthroscopic debridement). Mean age was 61 years, 59% females, and mean BMI was 33kg/m. 2. Mean follow-up was 5 years. Results. No fractures, extensor mechanism disruptions, or other complications related to late MUA occurred. The mean ROM gained after MUA was 18° (76° to 94°, p<0.001). Substantial ROM gains (≥20°) occurred in 50%, while 21% made no gains or lost ROM after MUA. ROM gains ≥20° occurred in 54% of primary TKAs and 28% of revision TKAs. While ROM gains were higher when performed between 3–6 months (21°) compared to 6–12 months (13°) and >12 months (11°), these differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.26). No differences in mean ROM gains were observed in MUAs performed with or without arthroscopic assistance (19° versus 15°, p=0.54). Kaplan Meier survivorship free of repeat MUA and revision TKA were 85% and 80% at 20 years, respectively. Conclusion. Late MUA, coupled with arthroscopic assistance in selected patients, was safe in a broad range of stiff primary and revision TKAs with no fractures or extensor disruptions occurring. While mean ROM improvements were modest, a substantial subset of patients achieved clinically important ROM gains ≥20°. Summary. Late MUA substantially improved ROM in a subset of patients with stiff TKAs and was done safely. In selected patients, arthroscopic lysis of adhesions or formal debridement aided the perceived safety and efficacy

Introduction. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) remains the gold standard to address restricted range of motion (ROM) within 3–6 months after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is little data on the outcomes of MUA with different types of anesthesia. We sought to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing MUA with intravenous (IV) sedation and neuraxial anesthesia. Methods. We identified 548 MUAs after primary TKA (136 IV sedation, 413 neuraxial anesthesia) at a single institution from 2016–2019. Mean age was 62 years and 349 patients (64%) were female. Mean body mass index was 32 kg/m. 2. The mean time from primary TKA to MUA was 10 weeks. Mean pre-MUA ROM was similar between each group; mean pre-MUA extension was 4.2° (p=0.35) and mean pre-MUA flexion was 77° (p=0.56). Patient demographics were statistically similar between both groups. We compared immediate complications, including fracture, extensor mechanism disruptions, and wound complications, Visual analogue pain scores (VAS), length of stay (LOS), and immediate and 3 month follow-up ROM between these groups. Results. No patients in either group sustained an immediate post-MUA complication. Patients undergoing MUA with IV sedation had significantly higher day of MUA average VAS of 5.1 compared to 4.1 in the neuraxial group (p<0.001). The average LOS was shorter in patients that received IV sedation (9 hours) compared to neuraxial anesthesia (12 hours) (p=0.009). Immediate-post MUA ROM was 1° – 121° in the IV sedation group and 0.9° – 123° in the neuraxial anesthesia group (p=0.21). Three month follow-up ROM was 2° – 108° in the IV sedation group and 1.9° – 110° in the neuraxial anesthesia group. Conclusion. IV sedation and neuraxial anesthesia are both effective anesthetic methods for patients undergoing MUA after primary TKA with minimal perioperative differences. Surgeons and anesthesiologists should cater anesthetic technique to patient specific needs as the orthopedic outcomes are similar for both methods; however, IV sedation resulted in a shorter LOS

Introduction. Tibial component loosening is a frequent cause of failure in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management options include isolated tibial component revision or full component revision. A full component revision is frequently selected by surgeons who are unfamiliar with the existing implant or have a “let's just start over attitude.” This option adds morbidity versus isolated tibial exchange. While isolated tibial exchange has lower morbidity, it is technically more challenging with regard to exposure and maintaining prosthetic stability. This study was designed to compare these two reconstructive options. Methods. Patients revised for isolated aseptic tibial loosening were identified from 2012–2017. Patients with revision implants, or those revised for infection, instability, osteolysis, or femoral component loosening were excluded. 161 patients met these criteria, 85 patients had an isolated tibial revision and 76 had revision of both components despite having only a loose tibial component. Patient demographics as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded for each cohort. Results. Patient demographical information, including age, gender, and BMI were statistically similar between the two cohorts. Median follow-up was 3.5 years. Supplemental metaphyseal fixation was used in 22 patients in the isolated tibial cohort and 19 of the full revision cohort. There was a higher incidence of radiographic loosening in the full component revision cohort (10.5% vs. 6.0%; p=0.28). There were five failures requiring revision in the isolated tibial cohort, two for sepsis, one for repeat isolated tibial loosening, one for femoral aseptic loosening, and one for an extensor mechanism disruption. There were eight failures in the full component cohort, three for patellar avascular necrosis, two for sepsis, one for repeat tibial loosening, one for arthrofibrosis, and one for a postoperative wound dehiscence. Conclusion. Isolated tibial revision for aseptic tibial loosening has similar clinical and radiographic results when compared to full component revision. Although no intraoperative complications were identified when revising the femur, there is the potential for complications unique to femoral revision. Femoral component revision for isolated tibial loosening is unnecessary and should be avoided provided adequate ligamentous stability can be obtained. Keywords: Aseptic loosening, Tibial loosening, revision total knee replacement, total knee replacement. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Active robotics for total knee Arthroplasty (TKA) uses a CAD-CAM approach to plan the correct size and placement of implants and to surgically achieve planned limb alignment. The TSolution One Total Knee Application (THINK Surgical Inc., Fremont, CA) is an open-implant platform, CT-based active robotic surgical system. A multi-center, prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted TKA using the TSolution One Total Knee Application. This report details the findings from the IDE. Methods. Patients had to be ≥ 21 years old with BMI ≤ 40, Kellgren-Lawrence Grade ≥ 3, coronal deformity ≤ 20°, and sagital flexion contracture ≤ 15° to participate. In addition to monitoring all adverse events (AE), a pre-defined list of relevant major AEs (medial collateral ligament injury, extensor mechanism disruption, neural deficit, periprosthetic fracture, patellofemoral dislocation, tibiofemoral dislocation, vascular injury) were specifically identified to evaluate safety. Bleeding complications were also assessed. Malalignment rate, defined as the percentage of patients with more than a ± 3° difference in varus-valgus alignment from the preoperative plan, was used to determine accuracy of the active robotic system. Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Short Form 12 (SF-12) Health Surveys were assessed as clinical outcome measures. Results were compared to published values associated with manual TKA. Results. A total of 115 patients were enrolled at 6 US centers and followed for a maximum of 12 months after surgery. Mean surgical time (incision to close) improved consistently as the technique evolved (first 10 cases = 131.5 min, first 20 cases = 122.4 min), with mean robot time = 45.8 min. The incidence of pre-defined AEs identified was 0%, serving as a measure of safety of the procedure. Outside of the pre-defined list, only one AE was definitely associated with the use of the device; a metal tack was left inside the knee joint but no reoperation was performed. No patients required a blood transfusion. Alignment outside of the ± 3° goal was 11.2% with a difference of 0.5° ± 1.9° (mean ± STD), which represents a 43% statistically significant (posterior probability > 0.95) reduction in malalignment compared to the literature. Mean KSS Functional scores improved from 40.2 at baseline to 65.4 at 3 months, mean KSS Objective scores improved from 46.9 to 71.2, mean KSS Patient Satisfaction scores improved from 14.5 to 30.6, and mean SF-12 Physical Component scores improved from 32.9 to 43.5. Discussion. The TSolution One Total Knee Application is descended from an active robotic system used in >8000 cases outside the United States since 2002. This trial represents the first US based study of this technology for primary TKA. The clinical study demonstrated positive safety outcomes as none of the seven pre-defined AEs were observed and there were no cases requiring transfusion. A positive effectiveness outcome was also demonstrated as the malalignment rate found in this study showed a substantial reduction from the 32% malalignment rate published in the literature for conventional instruments. KSS and SF-12 scores were comparable to other published TKA series. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Active robotics for total knee Arthroplasty (TKA) uses a CAD-CAM approach to plan the correct size and placement of implants and to surgically achieve planned limb alignment. The TSolution One Total Knee Application (THINK Surgical Inc., Fremont, CA) is an open-implant platform, CT-based active robotic surgical system. A multi-center, prospective, non-randomized clinical trial was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted TKA using the TSolution One Total Knee Application. This report details the findings from the IDE. Methods. Inclusion criteria for patients receiving robotic TKA were: primary unilateral TKA; Kellgren-Lawrence OA grade 3 or 4; BMI < 40 kg/m2; coronal plane deformity < 20° varus; sagittal flexion contracture < 15°. In addition to monitoring all adverse events (AE), a pre-defined list of relevant major AEs were specifically identified to evaluate safety (Healy et al, 2013): medial collateral ligament injury; extensor mechanism disruption; neural deficit; periprosthetic fracture; patellofemoral dislocation; tibiofemoral dislocation; and vascular injury. Bleeding complications were also assessed. Malalignment rate, defined as the percentage of patients with more than a ± 3° difference in varus-valgus alignment from the preoperative plan, was used to determine accuracy of the active robotic system. Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Short Form 12 (SF-12) Health Surveys were assessed as clinical outcome measures. For each outcome, results were compared to published values associated with manual TKA. Results. A total of 115 patients were enrolled at 6 US centers and followed for a maximum of 12 months after surgery. Mean surgical time (incision to close) improved consistently as the technique evolved (first 10 cases = 131.5 min, first 20 cases = 122.4 min), with mean robot time = 45.8 min. The incidence of pre-defined AEs identified was 0%, serving as a measure of safety of the procedure. Outside of the pre-defined list, only one AE was definitely associated with the use of the device; a metal pin was left inside the knee joint but no reoperation was performed. No patients required a blood transfusion. Alignment outside of the ± 3° goal was 11.2% with a difference of 0.5° ± 1.9° (mean ± STD), which represents a 45% statistically significant (posterior probability > 0.95) reduction in malalignment compared to the literature (Mason et al, 2007). Mean KSS Functional scores improved from 40.5 at baseline to 65.3 at 3 months, mean KSS Objective scores improved from 36.8 to 81.0, mean KSS Patient Satisfaction scores improved from 14.4 to 30.6, and mean SF-12 Physical Component scores improved from 32.9 to 43.5. Discussion. The TSolution One Total Knee Application is descended from an active robotic system used in >8000 cases outside the United States since 2002. This trial represents the first US based study of this technology for primary TKA. The clinical study demonstrated positive safety outcomes as none of the seven pre-defined AEs were observed and there were no cases requiring transfusion. A positive effectiveness outcome was also demonstrated as the malalignment rate found in this study showed a substantial reduction from the 32% malalignment rate published in the literature for conventional instruments. KSS and SF-12 scores were comparable to other published TKA series. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Achievement of adequate exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty is critical as it reduces the surgical time, enhances the ability for both component removal and reconstruction, and avoids devastating complications such as extensor mechanism disruption. However, this can be challenging as prior multiple surgeries and limited mobility contribute to a loss of tissue elasticity, thickened capsular envelope, and peri-articular soft tissue adhesions. A thorough pre-operative assessment of a patient's past surgical history, comorbidities, pre-operative radiographs (i.e. the presence of severe patella baja), and physical examination including range of motion, prior incisions, and soft tissue pliability are useful in determining the appropriate surgical techniques necessary for a successful revision. A systematic approach to the ankylosed knee is critical. Most techniques are geared towards mobilization of the extensor mechanism to safely displace the patella for component exposure. The initial exposure should consist of a long skin incision, a subperiosteal medial release, and debridement of suprapatellar, medial, and lateral adhesions to the femoral condyles. A lateral capsular release can prove helpful in further mobilization of the extensor mechanism. When performing a medial parapatellar arthrotomy it's important to keep in mind further extensile exposure techniques that may be required. For example, the arthrotomy should not extend proximally into the vastus intermedius or rectus femoris in the event that a quadriceps snip technique is to be used as this can compromise the ability to repair this exposure. Despite a large exposure and release of adhesions, sometimes the extensor mechanism remains at risk of rupture and adequate visualization cannot be obtained. In this event, extensile exposures such as a quadriceps snip, quadriceps turndown or tibial tubercle osteotomy are considered. The location of the patella often dictates the best exposure option as severe patella baja may not be overcome with a proximally based release. The quadriceps snip is most commonly used and provides improved exposure without the necessity of modifying the patient's post-operative rehabilitation. In addition, it can be extended to a quadriceps turndown which vastly improves visualization, but at the expense of needing to immobilise the knee post-operatively. A tibial tubercle osteotomy can also be used and provides excellent exposure especially in the case of severe patella baja or when removal of a cemented tibial stem is required. It preserves the extensor muscles, but risks include increased post-operative wound drainage due to limited soft tissue coverage, failure of fixation, or fracture of the tibial tubercle fragment or tibial shaft. Exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty is critical. Fortunately, this can be reliably achieved with a systematic approach to the knee and through the use of several extensile exposures at the surgeon's discretion

Whether or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Several methods of dealing with the patella exist: ALWAYS resurface; NEVER resurface; SOMETIMES resurface. There is good reason to consider selective patellar resurfacing. First, in an age of partial knee arthroplasty we have become more tuned in to analyzing patterns of arthritis. In TKA there is a high percentage of patients who do not have significant patellar cartilage wear or anterolateral knee pain. These patients may be candidates for leaving the patella unresurfaced in TKA. Arno et al found that 42% of patients had no significant patellar arthritis at the time of TKA. Roberts et al found that only 15% of patients should undergo patella resurfacing based on the presence of exposed bone on the patella; the other 85% could be considered suitable for leaving the patella unresurfaced. Second, despite a cumulative incidence of less than 5–10%, problems related to patellar resurfacing account for perhaps the most catastrophic complications encountered, with treatments that have limited success. These complications include fracture, avascular necrosis, extensor mechanism disruption, and anterior knee pain. Third, it is a fallacy to think that anterior knee pain (AKP) does not exist despite primary patellar resurfacing in TKA. Meftah (Ranawat) et al found that AKP persists in 30% of patients and new AKP develops in 10% of patients after TKA with patellar resurfacing. Barrack et al found that with patellar resurfacing the incidence of AKP is 28% in patients without preop AKP and 9% in those with preop AKP. They also found that without patellar resurfacing the incidence of new AKP was 14% and persistent AKP was 23%. Fourth, only roughly 44–64% of patients who undergo secondary patellar resurfacing for AKP after TKA with an unresurfaced patella actually get relief of their pain, suggesting that there is some other etiology of anterior knee pain. Residual component malalignment, boxy femoral components, PF overstuffing, referred pain or asymmetric resurfacing may explain ongoing pain. Finally, the data in well-designed studies show that selective patellar resurfacing can produce similar outcomes with and without resurfacing, particularly in those without significant patellar arthritis. In multiple studies, higher rates of secondary surgery occur when the patella is left unresurfaced in primary TKA, but this is for “pain” without clear etiology. On the other hand secondary surgery is rarely performed in TKA with patellar resurfacing for “pain” only, despite its high incidence. The quality of patellar cartilage at the time of primary TKA should be considered, as that may be the best indicator of whether a knee will do well without patellar resurfacing (that is, selective patellar resurfacing may be a better idea than never resurfacing the patella). While patellar resurfacing remains controversial in modern TKA, excellent outcomes are achievable with, and without, primary patellar resurfacing. Selectively leaving the patella unresurfaced when there is limited patellar arthritis may not only be highly effective, but it may also limit the incidence of secondary resurfacing that may occur with more substantial patellar arthritis while also minimizing the risk of some of the devastating complications that can occur due to patellar resurfacing in TKA

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a logic procedure when osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis is limitad to one femorotibial compartment. The indications for the procedure includes osteoarthrosis or osteonecrosis with full-thickness loss of articular cartilage limited to one of the tibiofemoral knee compartments. Physical examination should ensure full range of knee motion. Frontal and sagittal knee stability has to be tested. A particular attention should be given to the state of the anterior cruciate ligament. The status of the patellofemoral joint should be analysed by physical examination and patellofemoral view at 30, 60 and 90° of flexion. Preoperative anteroposterior varus and valgus stress radiographs should be done to confirm the complete loss of articular cartilage in the involved compartment, the full thickness cartilage in the opposite compartment and the possibility of full correction of the deformity to neutral. The so-called minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedure using a specific instrumentation is able to provide quicker recovery since the extensor mechanism disruption is eliminated. More importantly the radiological evaluation has shown that precise implantation of the components is possible with an MIS approach which is important for the long term results of the arthroplasty. The clinical results at ten years of follow-up of cemented metal-backed UKA performed through a conventional approach have shown results comparable to those obtained with total knee arthroplasty. The in vivo kinematic evaluation of patients implanted with UKA has shown that kinematics similar to the normal knee can be obtained, enhancing the importance of a functional anterior cruciate ligament. Recent design improvements have increased the femorotibial area of contact to accommodate high flexion angles. Additionally our experience has demonstrated that modern UKA is a valid alternative for young and active patients with unicompartmental tibiofemoral noninflammatory disease, including both osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. Compared to medial UKA lateral UKA represents in our experience only 5% of all UKA implantations. However the long term results of lateral UKA compares at least equally with those reported for medial UKA

Skin necrosis after total knee arthroplasty can rapidly lead to infection of the prosthetic components. Risk factors for the development of skin necrosis include rheumatoid arthritis, steroid use, immunosuppression, malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, and multiple prior scars. Vascularity of the skin over the knee will affect the rate of healing postoperatively and risk of necrosis. Johnson measured transcutaneous skin oxygen tension and found that the oxygen tension decreases for the first two to three days after surgery and then increases. In addition, the lateral skin edge is more hypoxic than the medial edge. This suggests that when multiple prior scars are present, the most vertical lateral incision should be used to minimise skin hypoxia. Constant passive motion further decreases skin oxygen tension. Particularly for patients with multiple risk factors for developing wound complications, avoidance or delayed used of early range of motion exercises may be beneficial in reducing the development of skin necrosis. If skin necrosis does occur after total knee arthroplasty, early recognition of the problem and treatment will minimise the risk of deep infection of the prosthetic components. Necrosis of the proximal wound including the area over the patella may be treated by local wound care and skin grafting. However, necrosis over the tibial tubercle or patellar tendon requires muscle flap coverage to prevent infection involving the patellar tendon. If the patellar tendon is not viable and the extensor mechanism disrupted, the medial gastrocnemius flap can also be used to augment the extensor mechanism. The tendon of the gastrocnemius is repaired to the quadriceps tendon maintaining continuity between the tibia and extensor mechanism

Aims

Endoprosthetic reconstruction with a distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) can be used to treat distal femoral bone loss from oncological and non-oncological causes. This study reports the short-term implant survivorship, complications, and risk factors for patients who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications.

Aims

Outcomes of current operative treatments for arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are not consistently positive or predictable. Pharmacological in vivo studies have focused mostly on prevention of arthrofibrosis. This study used a rabbit model to evaluate intra-articular (IA) effects of celecoxib in treating contracted knees alone, or in combination with capsular release.