The anatomy of the femur shows a high inter-patient variability, making it challenging to design standard prosthetic devices that perfectly adapt to the geometry of each individual. Over the past decade, Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) have been largely used as a tool to represent an average shape of many three-dimensional objects, as well as their variation in shape. However, no studies of the morphology of the residual femoral canal in patients who have undergone an amputation have been performed. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the main modes of variation in the shape of the canal, therefore simulating and analysing different levels of osteotomy. To assess the variability of the femoral canal, 72 CT-scans of the lower limb were selected. A segmentation was performed to isolate the region of interest (ROI), ranging from the lesser tip of the trochanter to the 75% of the length of the femur. The canals were then sized to scale, aligned, and 16 osteotomy levels were simulated, starting from a section corresponding to 25% of the ROI and up to the distal section. For each level, the main modes of variations of the femoral canal were identified through Principal Component Analysis (PCA), thus generating the mean geometry and the extreme shapes (±2 stdev) of the principal modes of variation. The shape of the canals obtained from these geometries was reconstructed every 10 mm, best- fitted with an ellipse and the following parameters were evaluated: i) ellipticity, by looking at the difference between axismax and axismin; ii) curvature of the canal, calculating the arc of circumference passing through the shapes’ centroids; iii) conicity, by looking at the maximum/minimum diameter; iv) mean diameter. To understand the association between the main modes and the shape variance, these parameters were compared, for each level of osteotomy, between the two extreme geometries of the main modes of variation. Results from PCA pointed out that the first three PCs explained more than the 87% of the total variance, for each level of simulated osteotomy. By analysing the extreme geometries for a distal osteotomy (e.g. 80% of the length of the canal), the first PC was associated to a combination of ROC (var%=41%), conicity (var%=28%) and ellipticity (var%=7%). PC2 was still associated with the ROC (var%=16%), while PC3 turned out to be associated with the diameter (var%=38%). Through the SSM presented in this study, a quantitatively evaluation of the deformation of the intramedullary canal has been made possible. By analysing the extreme geometries obtained from the first three modes of variance, it is clear that the first three PCs accounted for the variations in terms of curvature, conicity, ellipticity and diameter of the femoral canal with a different weight, depending on the level of osteotomy. Through this work, it was also possible to parametrize these variations according to the level of excision. The results given for the segment corresponding to the 80% of the length of the canal showed that, at that specified level, the ROC, conicity and ellipticity were the anatomical parameters with the highest range of variability, followed by the variation in terms of diameter. Therefore, the analysis carried out can provide information about the relevance of these parameters depending on the level of osteotomy suffered by the amputee. In this way, optimal strategies for the design and/or customization of osteo-integrated stems can be offered depending on the patient's residual limb

Introduction and Objectives: We analysed a series of 27 patients who underwent salvage total hip replacement and femoral packing with bone bank allograft for the treatment of femoral defects. We analyzed results clinically and radiographically. Materials and Methods: This study involved 27 hip salvage surgeries in 27 patients. The patients were treated between March 1997 and April 1999 with a follow-up period of 4–6 years. Femoral defects were classified according to AAOS criteria. Clinical results were assessed using the Harris scale. Radiographic studies were performed postoperatively, at 6 months, at one year after treatment, at 4 years, and in 6 cases, at 6 years. We also analysed clinical complications, technical problems, and sinking of the prosthesis into the femoral canal. Results: Of these patients, 80% did not present with pain one year after treatment, and 85% could walk without assistance. The graft was incorporated in 90% of cases. Sinking of the prosthesis without indications of loosening occurred in less than 50% of cases. In one patient is was necessary to repeat treatment due to sinking and loosening of the femoral component, and in another case it was necessary to remove the prosthesis due to infection. Discussion and Conclusions: The method of impaction of morselised cancellous bone into the femoral canal as described by Ling et al. has been shown in recent years to be reliable and reproducible in cases of femoral canal defects resulting from osteolysis and significant losses of cortical bone. Bone stock is restored, thus paving the way for future revisions with distal diaphyseal attachment revision prosthesis. Continued evaluation of the allograft impaction technique in femoral component revision shows optimal results after 5 years of follow up

We have long suspected that patients treated at our institution have narrower femoral canals than the literature suggests. This has implications when it comes to nail size and the question of using reamed or unreamed nails. Using CT analysis, we studied the morphology of the femoral isthmus. We prospectively evaluated 30 men with a mean age of 26 years (20 to 35). Patients with previous femoral fractures were excluded from the study. A scanogram determined the level of the isthmus and axial cuts at this level accurately revealed canal size and shape. We found a canal size of less than 12 mm in 62%. In a third of these, canal size was less than 11 mm. Axial cuts showed three types of femoral canals: 14 patients had thick femoral cortices and a narrow canal, seven had thin cortices and a wider canal, and nine had an oval canal, with the larger diameter in the sagittal plane. If one adheres to the principle of reaming until cortical clutter is heard, the recommended 12-mm or 13-mm reamed femoral nail is not suitable for the majority of non-Caucasian men in our population. Larger nails may cause such complications as delayed union, nonunion and fracture. Smaller nails of 10-mm and 11-mm diameter result in satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes

Bone growth was compared in six types of (beta-tricalcium phosphate) implants implanted in subcutaneous pouches or close to femoral head of male Wistar rats:. implants immersed in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (control implants),. implants with the progenitor cells from femoral canal,. implants immersed in inductive BMP-2 solution,. implants with the progenitor cells from femoral canal + BMP-2 solution,. implants immersed in inductive BMP-2 solution and implanted closed to the femoral head,. implants immersed in inductive BMP-2 solution and implanted closed to the femoral head while leaving the femoral canal opened for better access of the femoral canal cells. Implants were removed 21 days after operation and dissected following principles of stereology. Presence of bone or cartilage or connective tissue was evaluated by hematoxylin eosin histochemistry. Results: Bone formation was only found in the implants where BMP-2 was introduced. However, no distinctive differences were found between the implants where cells and BMP-2 were introduced and between the implants where just BMP-2 was used. Percentages of the bone tissue out of all the implant were as follows: 0.0% in group 1, 1.2% in group 2, 32.4% in group 3, 42.4% in group 4, 44.4% in group 5 and, 54.9% in group 6. Differences in amount of bone tissue were statistically significant between groups 3 and 2, groups 3 and 1 and also between groups 1 and 2 (p=0.0013, p=0.0004 and p=0.0525 respectively). In the other cases, the differences between BMP-2 affected implants and implants without BMP-2 were even greater. We concluded that presence of osteoconductive matrix and introduction of an osteoinductive agent (e.g. BMP-2) are the main components of designing of bone tissue and introduction of exogenous bone cells is not as important as the first two in subcutaneous pouches or close to the hip joint

In the cementless total hip arthroplasty, the position of the stem is pretty much determined by broach and rasping with which the is required for two reasons: one is to align the stem with the femur at the desired position and the orientation. The other is to achieve the conformity between the stem and the prepared proximal cavity surface in the femur. The robotic hip surgery can be a solution for the accurate of femoral canal shaping, but recent reports about the clinical follow-up study of the robotic hip surgery indicated frequent dislocation mainly due to the excessive soft tissue damage during robotic operation. In this paper, a guide being inserted into the femoral canal is proposed to restrict the undesired motion of the rasp inside the femur without extra incision. A set of canal guide and custom rasp for the selected stem(versys fibermetal midcoat, zimmer co.)were developed and tested with 4 synthetic femurs (model 1130, Sawbones co.). After rasping, a plastic copy of the stem was inserted into the femur and sliced at 5 mm thickness. From obtained cross sections, percentages of the gap larger than 0.3mm between the stem and the bone was measured. 6_C_Results: In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. In average, 79% of bone-implant interface was close contact. Valgus/varus deviations of the stem were 0.40±0.45 degree, which means the angle of axis of straight reamer and axis of final cut. The conformity of femoral canal with the femoral stem in this approach was higher than the conventional hip surgery and comparable to those in the robotic surgery. The alignment of the stem within the femur is also as good as those in the robotic surgery(0.34±0.67 approach does require neither expensive system nor CT scan. Also this approach can be executed swiftly without extra time and unnecessary large incision compared with the robotic surgery

Objectives. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the cementless, tapered-wedge stem design contributes to achieving initial stability and providing optimal load transfer in the proximal femur. However, loading conditions on the femur following THA are also influenced by femoral structure. Therefore, we determined the effects of tapered-wedge stems on the load distribution of the femur using subject-specific finite element models of femurs with various canal shapes. Patients and Methods. We studied 20 femurs, including seven champagne flute-type femurs, five stovepipe-type femurs, and eight intermediate-type femurs, in patients who had undergone cementless THA using the Accolade TMZF stem at our institution. Subject–specific finite element (FE) models of pre- and post-operative femurs with stems were constructed and used to perform FE analyses (FEAs) to simulate single-leg stance. FEA predictions were compared with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) measured for each patient during the first post-operative year. Results. Stovepipe models implanted with large-size stems had significantly lower equivalent stress on the proximal-medial area of the femur compared with champagne-flute and intermediate models, with a significant loss of BMD in the corresponding area at one year post-operatively. Conclusions. The stovepipe femurs required a large-size stem to obtain an optimal fit of the stem. The FEA result and post-operative BMD change of the femur suggest that the combination of a large-size Accolade TMZF stem and stovepipe femur may be associated with proximal stress shielding. Cite this article: M. Oba, Y. Inaba, N. Kobayashi, H. Ike, T. Tezuka, T. Saito. Effect of femoral canal shape on mechanical stress distribution and adaptive bone remodelling around a cementless tapered-wedge stem. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:362–369. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.2000525

For radiographic assessment of THA, we must estimate a 3-D structure with 2-D images. Basically, it has been good. But even after a successful surgery, sometimes we encountered an undersized stem in radiograph. Interestingly, it was more frequent after we introduced surgical robot for primary THA. It sometimes brought a huge dilemma during planning and evaluating the surgery. We performed this study to elucidate the cause of this problem. We used image data of 30 consecutive THAs using ROBODOC (ISS, USA). The measurement was made with the built-in tool in the Orthodoc, which is for the CT-based preoperative planning, and digital imaging system (PiView, Infinitt, Korea). We measured femoral anteversion, tilting angle at corresponding level, the longest and shortest diameters of femoral canal and their ratio. Also we measured anteversion and alignment of the stem. The canal filling of the stem was measured in projected images with CT and postoperative radiographs. The mean femoral anteversion was 21.1±10.2°. The canal tiling angle was 39.3±7.9°(p< 0.01). The long and short diameters were 19.3±2.6° and 14.3±1.8°. The mean ratio between them was 0.8±0.08°. Canal filling at AP and lateral dimensions were 88.25±9.8% and 85.7±6.9%. In postoperative radiographs, they were 85.4±7.3%(p=0.05) and 88.0±6.1%(p=0.06). This result suggests that the femoral canal at this particular or more distal level is elliptically shaped constantly. It tilts (in axial plane) to the same direction but not to the same degrees with femoral anteversion. Because of this tilt, relatively well-fixed round femoral stem can be considered as undersized in plane radiograph. Therefore, rather than using two plain radiographs alone for postoperative evaluation, adding postoperative CT may provide appropriate accuracy for assessment. And surgeon should keep in mind this axial tilt during planning and evaluating a robotic THA, especially not to remove too much healthy cortical bones to obtain full distal filling

Introduction

To utilize existing cancellous bone for initial stability, custom-made stems were implanted without reaming and rasping. This study reviewed the results of this non-reaming technique.

Introduction

One of the objectives of total hip arthroplasty is to restore femoral and acetabular combined anteversion. It is desirable to reproduce both femoral and acetabular antevesions to maximize the acetabular cup fixation coverage and hip joint stability. Studies investigated the resultant of implanted femoral stem anteversion in western populations showed that the implanted femoral stems had only a small portion can meet the desirable femoral anteversion angle¹, and anteversion angle increases after the implantation of an anatomical femoral stem with anteverted stem neck comparing to anatomical femoral neck². The purpose of this study was to anatomically measure the anteversion angular difference between metaphyseal long axis and femoral neck in normal Chinese population. The metaphyseal long axis represents the coronal fixation plane of modern cementless medial-lateral cortical fitting taper stem. This angular difference or torsion Δ angle provides the estimation of how much the neck antevertion angle of femoral stem would be needed to match for desirable anatomical femoral neck version.

Introduction. Traditionally, conventional radiographs of the hip are used to assist surgeons during the preoperative planning process, and these processes generally involve two-dimensional X-ray images with implant templates. Unfortunately, while this technique has been used for many years, it is very manual and can lead to inaccurate fits, such as “good” fits in the frontal view but misalignment in the sagittal view. In order to overcome such shortcomings, it is necessary to fully describe the morphology of the femur in three dimensions, therefore allowing the surgeon to successfully view and fit the components from all possible angles. Objective. The objective of this study was to efficiently describe the morphology of the proximal femur based on existing anatomical landmarks for use in surgical planning and/or forward solution modeling. Methods. Seven parameters are needed to fully define femoral morphology: head diameter, head center, neck shaft axis, femoral canal, proximal shaft axis, offset, and neck shaft angle. A previous algorithm has been developed in-house to automatically locate anatomical landmarks of patient specific bone models. Once the bone model has been aligned and scaled based on these landmarks, the femoral head diameter and center are calculated by iteratively fitting a sphere to the corresponding femoral head point cloud. An iterative cylindrical fitting algorithm is used to describe the neck shaft axis. The femoral canal is determined using three steps: 1) the femur is sliced at 10mm increments below the lesser trochanter, 2) the femoral canal boundary is determined at each slice, and 3) the largest circle is fit within each slice's canal boundary. The proximal shaft axis is described by fitting a line to the canal circle center locations. Offset is defined as the distance from the head center to the proximal shaft axis. Finally, the neck shaft angle is the angle between the neck shaft axis and the proximal shaft axis. Results. The goal pertaining to femoral component morphology is to provide meaningful information that can be used to determine how the femoral stem fits within the canal. Regardless of differences in bone sizes and geometries, the algorithm has proven to be successful in describing the femoral morphology of a patient-specific bone model. Discussion. These results lay the groundwork for an automatic stem fitting algorithm, which is described in a subsequent abstract. The morphology knowledge of the femoral head, femoral neck, femoral canal, and various axes can be coupled with known THA component parameters (such as offset, neck length, neck shaft angle, etc.) to allow our algorithms to predict the “best selection” and “best fit” for the femoral stem. This can also be applied to the acetabulum and can then be used as a surgical planning tool as well as a parameter when modeling postoperative predictions. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different. In the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The author's personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The author's current indication for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is an extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems, unfortunately, may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however, it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

This technique is a novel superior based muscle sparing approach. Acetabular reaming in all hip approaches requires femoral retraction. This technique is performed through a hole in the lateral femoral cortex without the need to retract the femur. A 5 mm hole is drilled in the lateral femur using a jig attached to the broach handle, similar to a femoral nail. Specialised instruments have been developed, including a broach with a hole going through it at the angle of the neck of the prosthesis, to allow the rotation of the reaming rod whilst protecting the femur. A special C-arm is used to push on the reaming basket. The angle of the acetabulum is directly related to the position of the broach inside the femoral canal and the position of the leg. A specialised instrument allows changing of offset and length without dislocating the hip during trialling. Some instrumentation has been used in surgery but ongoing cadaver work is being performed for proof of concept. The ability to ream through the femur has been proven during surgery. The potential risk to the bone has been assessed using finite analysis as minimal. The stress levels for any diameter maintained within a safety factor >4 compared to the ultimate tensile strength of cortical bone. The described technique allows for transfemoral acetabular reaming without retraction of the femur. It is minimally invasive and simple, requiring minimal assistance. We are incorporating use with a universal robot system as well as developing an electromagnetic navigation system. Assessment of the accuracy of these significantly cheaper systems is ongoing but promising. This approach is as minimally invasive as is possible, safe, requires minimal assistance and has a number of other potential advantages with addition of other new navigation and simple robotic attachments

Traditional mechanical debridement can only remove visibly infected tissue and is unable to completely clear all the biofilm that hides within muscle crevices and nerves. This study aims to determine the results of single-stage revision using noncontact low frequency ultrasonic debridement in treating chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). A prospective study of consecutive patients requiring single-stage revision for chronic PJI was performed since August 2021. After mechanical debridement, an 8‑mm handheld non‑contact low‑frequency ultrasound probe was used for ultrasonic debridement at a frequency of (25±5) kHz and power of 90% for 5 minutes. Each ultrasound lasted 10 seconds with 3‑seconds intervals. The probe was repeatedly sonicated among all soft tissue and bsingle interface. The distal femoral canal and the posterior capsule of the knee were fully sonicated with a special right‑angle probe. Chemical debridement was then performed to irrigation the whole operative area. Recurrence of infection, culture results and number of colonies 24 hours after ultrasonic debridement were recorded. A total of 45 patients (25 hips and 20 knees) were included and 43 of them (95.6%) were free of infection at a mean follow-up time of 29 months (24 to 33). There were no intraoperative complications related to ultrasonic debridement (neurovascular and muscle injury, poor wound healing and fat liquefaction). The culture‑positive rate of wound liquid before ultrasonic debridement was 40.0% (18/45), which significantly increased to 75.6% (34/45) after ultrasonic debridement (P=0.001). The median number of colonies 24 hours after ultrasonic debridement was 2372 CFU/ml (310 to 4340 CFU/ml), which was significantly higher than that before debridement (307 CFU/ml; 10 to 980 CFU/ml) (P=0.000). Single-stage revision with non‑contact low‑frequency ultrasonic debridement can fully expose bacteria within biofilm, increase the efficacy of chemical debridement and lead to a favorable short‑term outcome without related complications

Although data on uncemented short stems are available, studies on cemented short-stemmed THAs are limited. These cemented short stems may have inferior long-term outcomes and higher femoral component fracture rates. Hence, we examined the long-term follow-up of cemented short Exeter stems used in primary THA. Within the Exeter stem range, 7 stems have a stem length of 125 mm or less. These stems are often used in small patients, in young patients with a narrow femoral canal or patients with anatomical abnormalities. Based on our local database, we included 394 consecutive cemented stems used in primary THA (n=333 patients) with a stem length ≤125 mm implanted in our tertiary referral center between 1993 and December 2021. We used the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) to complete and cross-check the data. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to determine 20-year survival rates with stem revision for any reason, for septic loosening, for aseptic loosening and for femoral component fracture as endpoints. The proportion of male patients was 21% (n=83). Median age at surgery was 42 years (interquartile range: 30–55). The main indication for primary THA was childhood hip diseases (51%). The 20-year stem survival rate of the short stem was 85.4% (95% CI: 73.9–92.0) for revision for any reason and 96.2% (95%CI: 90.5–98.5) for revision for septic loosening. No stems were revised for aseptic femoral loosening. However, there were 4 stem fractures at 6.6, 11.6, 16.5 and 18.2 years of follow-up. The stem survival with femoral component fracture as endpoint was 92.7% (CI: 78.5–97.6) at 20 years. Cemented short Exeter stems in primary THA show acceptable survival rates at long-term follow-up. Although femoral component fracture is a rare complication of a cemented short Exeter stem, orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of its incidence and possible risk factors

Intraoperative fractures although rare are one of the complications known to occur while performing a total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, due to lower incidence rates there is currently a gap in this area of literature that systematically reviews this important issue of complications associated with THA. Method: We looked into Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the archives of meetings of orthopaedic associations and the bibliographies of included articles and asked experts to identify prospective studies, published in any language that evaluated intra-operative fractures occurring during total hip arthroplasty from the year 1950-2020. The screening, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by two researchers and if there was any discrepancy, a third reviewer was involved. Fourteen studies were identified. The reported range of occurrence of fracture while performing hip replacement surgery was found to be 0.4-7.6%. Major risk factors identified were surgical approaches, Elderly age, less Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Index score, change in resistance while insertion of the femur implants, inexperienced surgeons, uncemented femoral components, use of monoblock elliptical components, implantation of the acetabular components, patients with ankylosing spondylitis, female gender, uncemented stems in patients with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy and with cortices, different stem designs, heterogeneous fracture patterns and toothed design. Intraoperative fractures during THA were managed with cerclage wire, femoral revision, intramedullary nail and cerclage wires, use of internal fixation plates and screws for management of intra operative femur and acetabular fractures. The main reason for intraoperative fracture was found to be usage of cementless implants but planning and timely recognition of risk factors and evaluating them is important in management of intraoperative fractures. Adequate surgical site exposure is critical especially during dislocation of hip, reaming of acetabulum, impaction of implant and preparing the femoral canal for stem insertion. Eccentric and increased reaming of acetabulum to accommodate a larger cup is to be avoided, especially in females and elderly patients as the acetabulum is thinner. However, this area requires more research in order to obtain more evidence on effectiveness, safety and management of intraoperative fractures during THA

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different, in the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The authors' personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The authors' current indications for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is a extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems unfortunately may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons' armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

Introduction. Osteogenesis imperfect (OI) is a geno- and phenotypically heterogeneous group of congenital collagen disorders characterized by fragility and microfractures resulting in long bone deformities. OI can lead to progressive femoral coxa vara from bone and muscular imbalance and continuous microfracture about the proximal femur. If left untreated, patients develop Trendelenburg gait, leg length discrepancy, further stress fracture and acute fracture at the apex of the deformity, impingement and hip joint degeneration. In the OI patient, femoral coxa vara cannot be treated in isolation and consideration must be given to protecting the whole bone with the primary goal of verticalization and improved biomechanical stability to allow early loading, safe standing, re-orientation of the physis and avoidance of untreated sequelae. Implant constructs should therefore be designed to accommodate and protect the whole bone. The normal paediatric femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) ranges from 135 to 145 degrees. In OI the progressive pathomechanical changes result in FNSA of significantly less than 120 degrees and decreased Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angles (HEA). Proximal femoral valgus osteotomy is considered the standard surgical treatment for coxa vara and multiple surgical techniques have been described, each with their associated complications. In this paper we present the novel technique of controlling femoral version and coronal alignment using a tubular plate and long bone protection with the use of teleoscoping rods. Methodology. After the decision to operate had been made, a CT scan of the femur was performed. A 1:1 scale 3D printed model (AXIAL3D, Belfast, UK) was made from the CT scan to allow for accurate implant templating and osteotomy planning. In all cases a subtrochanteric osteotomy was performed and fixed using a pre-bent 3.5 mm 1/3 tubular plate. The plate was bent to allow one end to be inserted into the proximal femur to act as a blade. A channel into the femoral neck was opened using a flat osteotome. The plate was then tapped into the femoral neck to the predetermined position. The final position needed to allow one of the plate holes to accommodate the growing rod. This had to be determined pre operatively using the 3D printed model and the implants. The femoral canal was reamed, and the growing rod was placed in the femur, passing through the hole in the plate to create a construct that could effectively protect both the femoral neck and the full length of the shaft. The distal part of the plate was then fixed to the shaft using eccentric screws around the nail to complete the construct. Results. Three children ages 5,8 and 13 underwent the procedure. Five coxa vara femurs have undergone this technique with follow-up out to 62 months (41–85 months) from surgery. Improvements in the femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA) were av. 18. o. (10–38. o. ) with pre-op coxa vara FNSA av. 99. o. (range 87–114. o. ) and final FNSA 117. o. (105–125. o. ). Hilgenreiner's epiphyseal angle was improved by av. 29. o. (2–58. o. ). However only one hip was restored to <25. o. In the initial technique employed for 3 hips, the plates were left short in the neck to avoid damaging the physis. This resulted in 2 of 3 hips fracturing through the femoral neck above the plate at approximately 1 year. There were revisions of the 3 hips to longer plates to prevent intra-capsular stress riser. All osteotomies united and both intracapsular fractures healed. No further fractures have occurred within the protected femurs and no other repeat operations have been required. Conclusions. Surgical correction of the OI coxa vara hip is complex. Bone mineral density, multiplanar deformity, a desire to maintain physeal growth and protection of the whole bone all play a role in the surgeon's decision making process. Following modifications, this technique demonstrates a novel method in planning and control of multiplanar proximal femoral deformity, resulting in restoration of the FNSA to a more appropriate anatomical alignment, preventing long bone fracture and improved femoral verticalization in the medium term follow-up

Intra-operative fractures of the femur are on the rise mainly due to the increased use of cementless implants and the desire to get a tight press fit. The prevalence has been reported to be between 1–5% in cementless THAs. The key to preventing these fractures is to identify patients at high risk and careful surgical technique. Surgical risk factors include the use of cementless devices, revision hip surgery, the use of flat tapered wedges and MIS surgery. Patient factors that increased risk include increasing age, female gender, osteopenia and rheumatoid arthritis. These risk factors tend to be additive and certainly when more than one is present extra caution needs to be taken. Surgical technique is critical to avoid these intra-operative fractures. Fractures can occur during exposure and dislocation, during implant removal (in revision THA), during canal preparation and most commonly during stem insertion. In both primary, and especially in revision, THA be wary of the stiff hip in association with osteopenia or osteolysis. These patients require a very gentle dislocation. If this cannot be achieved, then alteration of the standard approach and dislocation may be needed. Examples of these include protrusion with an osteopenic femur and revision THA with a very stiff hip with lysis in the femur. Lastly, in cases with retained hardware, dislocate prior to removing plates and screws. After dislocation, the next challenge is gentle preparation of the femoral canal. A reasonable exposure is required to access the femoral canal safely. MIS procedures do not offer good access to femoral canal and this probably results in increased risk of fracture during broaching or implant insertion. When broaching, stop when broach will not advance further. When inserting a tapered wedge stem, be worried if stem goes further in than broach. In revision surgery, when taking the stem out from above, make sure the area of the greater trochanter does not overhang the canal. A high speed burr can clear the shoulder for easier access for removal. In revision THA with an ETO, place a cerclage wire prior to reaming and retighten prior to stem insertion. Even with careful surgical technique intra-operative femoral fractures will still occur. When inserting the stem, a sudden change in resistance is highly suggestive of fracture. Wide exposure of the entire proximal femur is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. The distal extent of the fracture must be seen. Only on occasion is an intra-operative radiograph needed. Management is directed to ensuring component stability and good fracture fixation. In primary total hip arthroplasty, calcar fractures are by far the most common. If using proximal fixation and you are certain the stem is stable, then all that is needed is cerclage wiring. As already mentioned, you must follow the fracture line distally so you are aware of how far down it goes. Often what appears to be a calcar split actually propagates distal to the lesser trochanter. In these cases, one would probably go for distal fixation plus wiring. In conclusion, intra-operative femoral fractures are on the rise. Prevention is the key

Background. Cement restrictors are used for maintaining good filling and pressurization of bone cement during hip and knee arthroplasties. The limitations of certain cement restrictors include the inability to accommodate for large medullary canals particularly in revision procedures. We describe a technique using SurgicelTM (Johnson & Johnson) and SPONGOSTAN™ (Johnson & Johnson) (Fig 1) to form a cement restrictor that can accommodate for large canal diameters and provide excellent pressurisation. Technique. The technique involves the application of SPONGOSTAN™ (Johnson & Johnson) foam onto a SurgicelTM (Johnson & Johnson) mesh which is then rolled onto the SPONGOSTAN™ foam forming a uniform cylindrical structure Figs 2,3. The diameter of the restrictor can be adjusted according to the desired femoral canal diameter through increasing the thickness of the SPONGOSTAN™ (Johnson & Johnson) foam. The restrictor is then inserted into the desired position in the medullary canal where it expands uniformly creating an effective restrictor and bone plug Fig 4. Bone cement is then applied and pressurisation commenced prior to the insertion of the implant Fig5. SPONGOSTAN™ is an absorbable haemostatic sponge intended for haemostatic use by applying to a bleeding surface. It consists of a sterile, water-insoluble, malleable, porcine gelatin absorbable sponge. Surgicel ™ is an absorbable hemostatic agent composed of oxidized regenerated cellulose. It is a sterile, absorbable knitted fabric that is flexible and adheres readily to bleeding surfaces. Both products are routinely used for their haemostatic properties in various surgical disciplines. Discussion. The use of intramedullary plugs in cemented total joint arthroplasty is essential in order to achieve good filling and pressurization in hip and knee arthoplasties, traditionally, a small piece of bone or a cement restrictor may be used to plug the shaft. Distal plugs seal the femoral canal, improve fixation and prevent bone cement from leaking during delivery and pressurization. Plugging the intramedullary canal during total hip arthroplasty increases penetration of cement into cancellous bone proximal to the intramedullary plug. Numerous plug designs and materials are available ranging from non-resorbable to resorbable. Regardless of design, all restrictors should avoid intramedullary cement leakage and plug migration during cement and stem insertion to ensure adequate intramedullary pressures. In some instances the diameter of the femoral canal is too wide to accommodate a conventional cement restrictor particularly when crossing the femoral isthmus and even more so in revision procedures requiring the implantation of long stemmed cemented components. The use of the Surgicel-Spongostan haemostatic restrictor overcomes some of the limitations of a standard cement restrictors. These include the ability to bypass a narrow femoral isthmus, accommodate large femoral canals, particularly in revision procedures, and the flexibility of adjusting the restrictor to the desired diameter of the medullary canal and in effect providing a bespoke cement restrictor. This technique was used successfully in over 300 revision hip and knee procedures with no adverse effects and excellent outcomes

Introduction. Conventional hip radiographs allow surgeons, during preoperative planning, to make important decisions. Size and location of implants are routinely measured by overlaying schematics of the implanted components onto preoperative radiographs. Most currently available planning tools are in two-dimensions (2D), using X-ray images and 2D templates of the implants. Determination of the ideal component size requires two radiographic views of the femur: the anterior-posterior (AP) and the lateral direction. The surgeon uses this information to determine component sizes. Even though this approach has been used for many years leading to very good results, this manual process potentially carries multiple shortcomings. The biggest issue with the AP X-ray image is the fact that it is 2D in nature while the measurement's objective is to obtain three-dimensional (3D) parameters. Objective. The objective of this study is to derive a methodology to automatically select correct THA implant sizes while keeping the anatomical center of each specific patient within a forward solution model (FSM) that predicts post-operative outcomes. Methods. The femoral components in our process contain five parameters: stem length, neck offset, neck length, neck shaft angle, and component width. There are many steps to measure the morphologic parameters of a femoral component. (1)Preparation of training implant database, (2)defining multi-plane intersection, (3)determining circumcircles for all intersected femoral component contours, (4)finding centers and radii of circumcircles, (5)measuring distances from each circumcircle to the femoral component head center, and (6)determining the stem shaft axis. The FSM fits specific femoral canal using a 3D mesh model of the femur. The femoral component and canal morphology of a femur model are compared to the training femoral component database. For each femoral component morphology, the algorithm determines how far distally the femoral component fits within the canal before collision between the stem and cortical bone. Once the defined position is confirmed, the relative distance from the anatomical femoral head center to the femoral component head center is calculated. This process is repeated for all femoral component morphology. The best fitting femoral component is determined when the distance from its head center to the femoral head center is minimized, Figure 1. Results. Three intensive validation tools have been developed: (1) cross-sectional analysis, (2) slice analysis, and (3) contact map analysis. Cross-sectional analysis is a graphic interaction program where users can freely view the anatomy at any orientation, Figure 2. The slice analysis enhances the user visualization by providing a static view of the fit between chosen femoral component and femoral canal, Figure 3. Finally, the contact map analysis allows for visualization of contact area through the bone-stem interface. Conclusion and Discussion. This is a powerful tool with the FSM that allows surgeons to get a “best fit” implant in 3D, based on canal fit and distance from anatomical femoral head center. Surgeons may want to manually size up or down, but the program will pick best fit sizes based on anatomical morphology. Future iterations will consider the reaming depth each surgeon uses to improve implant selection for each surgeon's technique. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly