The aim of this study was to determine the floor and ceiling effects for both the QuickDASH and PRWE following a fracture of the distal radius. Secondary aims were to determine the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and if there were patient factors associated with achieving a floor or ceiling effect. A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture and managed at the study centre during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, the PRWE, EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and the normal wrist score. There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs (20–95) and 421 (77%) were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs (4.3–5.5). A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the minimum clinical important difference of the best available score, the ceiling effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for the PRWE. Patients that achieved a ceiling score for the QuickDASH and PRWE subjectively felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, a dominant hand injury and better health-related quality of life were the common factors associated with achieving a ceiling score for both the QuickDASH and PRWE (all p<0.05). The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrate ceiling effects when used to assess the outcome of fractures of the distal radius. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’. Future patient-reported outcome assessment tools for fractures of the distal radius should aim to limit the ceiling effect, especially for individuals or groups that are more likely to achieve a ceiling score

Aims. The primary aim of this study is to quantify and compare outcomes following a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius in elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) who are managed conservatively versus with surgical fixation (open reduction and internal fixation). Secondary aims are to assess and compare upper limb-specific function, health-related quality of life, wrist pain, complications, grip strength, range of motion, radiological parameters, healthcare resource use, and cost-effectiveness between the groups. Methods. A prospectively registered (ISRCTN95922938) randomized parallel group trial will be conducted. Elderly patients meeting the inclusion criteria with a dorsally displaced distal radius facture will be randomized (1:1 ratio) to either conservative management (cast without further manipulation) or surgery. Patients will be assessed at six, 12, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks post intervention. The primary outcome measure and endpoint will be the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at 52 weeks. In addition, the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, pain score (visual analogue scale 1 to 10), complications, grip strength (dynamometer), range of motion (goniometer), and radiological assessments will be undertaken. A cost-utility analysis will be performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of surgery. We aim to recruit 89 subjects per arm (total sample size 178). Discussion. The results of this study will help guide treatment of dorsally displaced distal radial fractures in the elderly and assess whether surgery offers functional benefit to patients. This is an important finding, as the number of elderly distal radial fractures is estimated to increase in the future due to the ageing population. Evidence-based management strategies are therefore required to ensure the best outcome for the patient and to optimize the use of increasingly scarce healthcare resources. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(10):920–928

Purpose of the study: Treatment of comminutive fractures of the distal radius in elderly subjects remains a debated issue. Use of locked plates has given interesting results, particularly in the young subject. External fixation remains the simple osteosynthesis technique with the advantage of being minimally invasive and well adapted to the quality of bone in the elderly subject. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the mid-term results of a series of radiometacarpal joint bridgings of comminutive fractures of the distal radius. Material and methods: From January 2003 to December 2007, 44 radiometacarpal fixations were assemblied and included in a retrospective radioclinical study. All of the fractures were comminutive (AO classification: C2 20.4%, C3 79.6%) in subjects aged over 60 years. Surgery consisted in a radiocarpal assembly alone (25%) or associated with another fixation (75%). The PRWE score was used for the functional assessment and the Sofcot 2000 symposium criteria for the radiographic analysis. Factors of poor prognosis were studied. Results: Forty-four patients were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 28 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up. All patients had healed at mean 6.8 weeks. The functional outcome was good or very good in 45.4% of patients. Radiographically, anatomic restitution was achieved in 15.9% with a moderate to severe callus deformity in 84.1%. Fifteen complications were noted: reflex dystrophy (n=5), neuroma (n=2), material migration (n=6), disassembly with surgical revision (n=2) and superficial infection (n=2). Discussion: Unlike observations in the young subject, there does not appear to be a consensus on the treatment of comminutive fractures of the distal radius in the elderly osteoporotic subject. External fixation has been used for many years for comminutive fractures. Our results nevertheless illustrate the limitations of this technique, both in terms of the functional outcome (54.6% insufficient results) and radiographic outcome (84.1% callus deformities). The only good results obtained with the external fixator occurred when the technique was associated with another fixation method. This suggests we should consider fixation of the wrist as a temporary osteosynthesis which should be replaced by another method (locked plating)

Extensor Pollicis Longus (EPL) rupture occurs in 0.2 – 3% of fractures of the distal radius. The underlying mechanism is unknown. This study prospectively evaluates EPL and surrounding structures using high-resolution ultrasound (US) in patients with distal radius fracture 6 weeks after injury and correlates the findings with initial radiographic measurements. US can assess tendon size, echogenicity and peak velocity, haematoma depth and thickness of the extensor retinaculum and tendon sheath. The normal wrist was examined as a control. Results: 58 patients with mean age 54 yrs (39 female, 19 male), 28/58 underwent manipulation in the Emergency Department and 11/58 went to the Operating Theatre for fixation. Radiographic measurements – AO classification: A-32, B-12 and C-14. 76% were undisplaced fractures with dorsal tilt less than 10. Statistical analysis revealed that EPL tendon peak velocity is significantly slower on the fractured side (p=0.001). The extensor retinaculum thickness is greater (p=0.003) and the synovial sheath thickness is greater (p less than 0.001) on the fractured side. Synovial sheath thickness was also found to be significantly greater in the intra-articular fractures (p=0.03) and the undisplaced fractures (p=0.03). Conclusions: This study correlates patterns of distal radius fracture that are associated with US changes in EPL tendon. As expected, the peak tendon velocity is reduced following fracture, but this is still significant at 6 weeks. This could be associated with impaired diffusion of nutrients within the synovial sheath. There is also persistent soft tissue swelling with significantly increased extensor retinaculum and synovial sheath thickness. This is a protective response to trauma, but we propose that this could interfere with the already tenuous blood supply of the EPL tendon. It could also reduce diffusion of nutrients within the tendon sheath, particularly in undisplaced fractures, where the extensor retinaculum is not torn and any increased pressure may not be dispersed. The study is ongoing with the aim to be able to identify patients at risk for EPL rupture and potentially be able to prevent it by early surgical decompression

Osteoporosis is a disease when bone mass and tissue is lost, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and increase susceptibility to develop fracture. The osteoporosis prevalence increases markedly with age, from 2% at 50 years to more than 25% at 80 years. 1. in women. The vast majority of distal radius fractures (DRFs) can be considered fragility fractures. The DRF is usually the first medical presentation of these fractures. With an aging population, all fracture clinics should have embedded screening for bone health and falls risk. DRF is the commonest type of fracture in perimenopausal women and is associated with an increased risk of later non-wrist fracture of up to one in five in the subsequent decade. 2. . According to the national guidelines in managing the fragility fractures of distal radius with regards the bone health review, we, as orthopedic surgeons, are responsible to detect the risky patients, refer them to the responsible team to perform the required investigations and offer the treatment. We reviewed our local database (E-trauma) all cases of fracture distal radius retrospectively during the period from 01/08/2019 to 29/09/2019. We included total of 45 patients who have been managed conservatively and followed up in fracture clinic. Our inclusion criteria was: women aged 65 years and over, men aged 75 years and over with risk factors, patients who are more than 50 years old and sustained low energy trauma whatever the sex is or any patient who has major risk factor (current or frequent recent use of oral or systemic glucocorticoids, untreated premature menopause or previous fragility fracture). We found that 96% of patients were 50 years old or more and 84% of the patients were females. 71% of patients were not referred to Osteoporosis clinic and 11% were already under the orthogeriatric care and 18% only were referred. Out of the 8 referred patients, 3 were referred on 1st appointment, 1 on the 3rd appointment, 1 on discharge from fracture clinic to GP again and 3 were without clear documentation of the time of referral. We concluded that we as trust are not compliant to the national guidelines with regards the osteoporosis review for the DRF as one of the first common presentations of fragility fractures. We also found that the reason for that is that there is no definitive clear pathway for the referral in our local guidelines. We recommended that the Osteoporosis clinic referral form needs to be available in the fracture clinic in an accessible place and needs to be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the fracture clinic in the 1st appointment. A liaison nurse also needs to ensure these forms have been filled and sent to the orthogeriatric team. Alternatively, we added a portal on our online database (e-trauma), therefore the patient who fulfils the criteria for bone health review should be referred to the orthogeriatric team to review

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to report the radiological outcomes of patients with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture who were randomized to a moulded cast or surgical fixation with wires following manipulation and closed reduction of their fracture. The secondary aim was to correlate radiological outcomes with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the year following injury.

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are common injuries that represent 17% of all adult upper extremity fractures. Some fractures deemed appropriate for nonsurgical management following closed reduction and casting exhibit delayed secondary displacement (greater than two weeks from injury) and require late surgical intervention. This can lead to delayed rehabilitation and functional outcomes. This study aimed to determine which demographic and radiographic features can be used to predict delayed fracture displacement.

This is a multicentre retrospective case-control study using radiographs extracted from our Analytics Data Integration, Measurement and Reporting (DIMR) database, using diagnostic and therapeutic codes. Skeletally mature patients aged 18 years of age or older with an isolated DRF treated with surgical intervention between two and four weeks from initial injury, with two or more follow-up visits prior to surgical intervention, were included. Exclusion criteria were patients with multiple injuries, surgical treatment with fewer than two clinical assessments prior to surgical treatment, or surgical treatment within two weeks of injury. The proportion of patients with delayed fracture displacement requiring surgical treatment will be reported as a percentage of all identified DRFs within the study period. A multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was used to assess case-control comparisons, in order to determine the parameters that are mostly likely to predict delayed fracture displacement leading to surgical management. Intra- and inter-rater reliability for each radiographic parameter will also be calculated.

A total of 84 age- and sex-matched pairs were identified (n=168) over a 5-year period, with 87% being female and a mean age of 48.9 (SD=14.5) years. Variables assessed in the model included pre-reduction and post-reduction radial height, radial inclination, radial tilt, volar cortical displacement, injury classification, intra-articular step or gap, ulnar variance, radiocarpal alignment, and cast index, as well as the difference between pre- and post-reduction parameters. Decreased pre-reduction radial inclination (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.54; Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.43 – 0.64) and increased pre-reduction volar cortical displacement (OR = 1.31; CI = 1.10 – 1.60) were significant predictors of delayed fracture displacement beyond a minimum of 2-week follow-up. Similarly, an increased difference between pre-reduction and immediate post reduction radial height (OR = 1.67; CI = 1.31 – 2.18) and ulnar variance (OR = 1.48; CI = 1.24 – 1.81) were also significant predictors of delayed fracture displacement.

Cast immobilization is not without risks and delayed surgical treatment can result in a prolong recovery. Therefore, if reliable and reproducible radiographic parameters can be identified that predict delayed fracture displacement, this information will aid in earlier identification of patients with DRFs at risk of late displacement. This could lead to earlier, appropriate surgical management, rehabilitation, and return to work and function.

Introduction. Fractures of the distal radius are one of the most common extremity fractures encountered in A&E departments and general adult fracture clinics. Over the last 10 years the rate of operation for distal radial fractures has been steadily increasing. Staff within our unit felt that formal teaching, particularly of new medical staff, with regards to fracture reduction and appropriate cast application could result in a reduction in operation rates. Methods. Retrospective data was extracted from FORD (Fracture Outcome and Research Database). Data included: the number of fractures in a 6 month period, number of fractures undergoing ORIF in that period, fracture configuration, patient demographics, and mechanism of injury. All patients undergoing ORIF had their radiographs assessed by 2 separate reviewers. Information regarding adequate fracture reduction, adequate cast application (using Gap Index calculation), and appropriate plaster cast moulding was recorded. Formal teaching was then given to the next group of medical staff rotating through the unit, and the same data was collected prospectively for that 6 month period. Exclusion criteria included bilateral injuries, and polytrauma patients. Results. A total of 1712 distal radial fractures were treated in our unit over the 12 month period, with 71 undergoing ORIF in the first 6 months and 37 in the second 6 months. Our study found that formal teaching and education of medical staff significantly reduced the operation rate for distal radial fractures in our unit. This effect was most significant for extra-articular, dorsally angulated fractures of the distal radius. Conclusion. In today's busy hospital environment it is sometimes all too easy to overlook the training of junior medical staff, our study proves that just 1 hour of basic training at the beginning of an attachment can have significant benefits to both the unit and, more importantly, the patients

It is known that Osteoporosis is the pathology of bone mass and tissue loss resulting in an increase of fragility, risk of fracture occurrence, and risk of fracture recurrence. We noted there was no definitive pathway in our last audit, therefore recommended: availability of the Osteoporosis clinic referral form in an accessible place, the form be filled by the doctor reviewing the patient in the first fracture clinic, and a liaison nurse to ensure these forms were filled and sent to the Osteoporosis clinic. This second audit analyses our Trust's response to these recommendations and effect achieved in Osteoporosis care.

We reviewed our local data base from the 7/27/2020 – 10/2/2021 retrospectively for distal radius fractures who were seen in fracture clinic. We analysed a sample size of 59 patients, excluding patients who had already commenced bone protection medications.

67.7% of our patients had neither been on bone protection medications nor recorded referrals and 13.5% were already on bone protection medications when they sustained the fragility fracture. Ten out of the 51 patients were offered referral to the osteoporosis clinic, and one refused. This makes 20% (10 out of 50) of the patients had completed referrals. In comparison, in our first audit, 11% had already been on bone protection medications and 18% had completed referrals. The second cycle showed a slight increase in compliance. Majority of the referrals were completed by Orthopaedic Consultants in both audits and ana awareness increase noted among non-consultants in starting the referral process.

Based on our analysis, our Trust has a slight improvement in commencing bone protection medications, associated with slight improvement in completing referrals to the Osteoporosis clinic. Despite our recommendations in the first audit, there is still no easily accessible definitive pathway to ensure our Trust's patients have timely access to bone protection and continued care at the Osteoporosis clinic. We recommend streamlining our recommendations to have a more effective approach in ensuring our Trust meets national guidelines. We will implement a Yes or No question assessment for patients visiting clinic in our electronic database which should assist in referral completions.

Aims

Torus fractures are the most common childhood fracture, accounting for 500,000 UK emergency attendances per year. UK treatment varies widely due to lack of scientific evidence. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled equivalence trial of ‘the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge’ versus ‘rigid immobilization and follow-up as per the protocol of the treating centre’ in the treatment of torus fractures .

Objectives. There are various pin-in-plaster methods for treating fractures of the distal radius. The purpose of this study is to introduce a modified technique of ‘pin in plaster’. Methods. Fifty-four patients with fractures of the distal radius were followed for one year post-operatively. Patients were excluded if they had type B fractures according to AO classification, multiple injuries or pathological fractures, and were treated more than seven days after injury. Range of movement and functional results were evaluated at three and six months and one and two years post-operatively. Radiographic parameters including radial inclination, tilt, and height, were measured pre- and post-operatively. Results. The average radial tilt was 10.6° of volar flexion and radial height was 10.2 mm at the sixth month post-operatively. Three cases of pin tract infection were recorded, all of which were treated successfully with oral antibiotics. There were no cases of pin loosening. A total of 73 patients underwent surgery, and three cases of radial nerve irritation were recorded at the time of cast removal. All radial nerve palsies resolved at the six-month follow-up. There were no cases of median nerve compression or carpal tunnel syndrome, and no cases of tendon injury. Conclusion. Our modified technique is effective to restore anatomic congruity and maintain reduction in fractures of the distal radius. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:176–180

The aims of this study in relation to distal radius fractures were to determine (1) the floor and ceiling effects for the QuickDASH and PRWE, (2) the floor and ceiling effects when defined to be within the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the minimal or maximal scores, (3) the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and (4) patent factors associated with a floor or ceiling effect.

A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, PRWE, EQ-5D-3L and normal wrist score.

There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs and 77% were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs. A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the MCID of the best score, the effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for PRWE. Patients that achieved the best functional outcome according to the QuickDASH and PRWE felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. Sex (p=0.000), age (p=0.000), dominant wrist injury (p=0.006 for QuickDASH and p=0.038 for PRWE), fracture type (p=0.015), and a better health-related quality of life (p=0.000) were independently associated with achieving a ceiling score.

The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrated ceiling effects following a distal radius fracture. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’ for them.

Aims

Torus fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in children. The NICE non-complex fracture guidelines recently concluded that bandaging was probably the optimal treatment for these injuries. However, across the UK current treatment varies widely due to a lack of evidence underpinning the guidelines. The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial evaluates the effect of a soft bandage and immediate discharge compared with rigid immobilization.

Measurement of the rate of fracture healing is a major problem in fracture research. Bone mineral density (BMD) of fracture callus has been used as a measure of healing in diaphyseal fractures. However, metaphyseal fractures (especially in the elderly) are now the commonest type of fracture and are a significant public health problem. This study investigated whether measurement of BMD at the fracture site in the distal radius can be used as a measure of fracture healing. We recruited 28 patients who had sustained a dorsally displaced distal radial fracture which was deemed to require treatment by intrafocal wire fixation. All patients had acceptable correction of dorsal and radial angle at final x ray (3 months). Wrist function was measured using the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE – a validated outcome measure for use after distal radial fractures), grip strength,and range of motion. All measurements were made at 6, 12 and 26 weeks. BMD was measured at the fracture site (examining the BMD of the medullary bone at the fracture site after removal of wires), in the opposite wrist and the lumbar spine using QCT at 6 weeks after fracture. There was no correlation between fracture site BMD and BMD at the other wrist or the lumbar spine (r < 0.3). The BMD at the fracture site was higher than the BMD at the other wrist (mean 168 vs 70 HU; p< 0.001 paired T test). There was no relationship between fracture site BMD or the ratio of BMDs fracture site / normal wrist, and any of the functional assessments (proportion grip strength recovered, range of motion or PRWE (r < 0.3)). 15 of these patients underwent a second QCT at 12 weeks after fracture. There was no significant change in fracture site BMD between the first and second scan. These data indicate that fracture site BMD is unlikely to be a useful method of measuring metaphyseal bone healing. The increase in BMD at the fracture site was unexpected; possible explanations include impaction of bone or high BMD in woven bone (the relationship of which to bone stiffness is uncertain)

Aims. The aim of this trial was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a soft bandage and immediate discharge, compared with rigid immobilization, in children aged four to 15 years with a torus fracture of the distal radius. Methods. A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted from the UK NHS and personal social services (PSS) perspective, as well as a broader societal point of view. Health resources and quality of life (the youth version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-Y)) data were collected, as part of the Forearm Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) multicentre randomized controlled trial over a six-week period, using trial case report forms and patient-completed questionnaires. Costs and health gains (quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) were estimated for the two trial treatment groups. Regression was used to estimate the probability of the new treatment being cost-effective at a range of ‘willingness-to-pay’ thresholds, which reflect a range of costs per QALY at which governments are typically prepared to reimburse for treatment. Results. The offer of a soft bandage significantly reduced cost per patient (saving £12.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) -£5.30 to £19.80)) while QALYs were similar (QALY difference between groups: 0.0013 (95% CI -0.0004 to 0.003)). The high probability (95%) that offering a bandage is a cost-effective option was consistent when examining the data in a range of sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. In addition to the known clinical equivalence, this study found that the offer of a bandage reduced cost compared with rigid immobilization among children with a torus fracture of the distal radius. While the cost saving was small for each patient, the high frequency of these injuries indicates a significant saving across the healthcare system. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):623–630

Aims. Fractures of the distal radius are common, and form a considerable proportion of the trauma workload. We conducted a study to examine the patterns of injury and treatment for adult patients presenting with distal radius fractures to a major trauma centre serving an urban population. Methods. We undertook a retrospective cohort study to identify all patients treated at our major trauma centre for a distal radius fracture between 1 June 2018 and 1 May 2021. We reviewed the medical records and imaging for each patient to examine patterns of injury and treatment. We undertook a binomial logistic regression to produce a predictive model for operative fixation or inpatient admission. Results. Overall, 571 fractures of the distal radius were treated at our centre during the study period. A total of 146 (26%) patients required an inpatient admission, and 385 surgical procedures for fractures of the distal radius were recorded between June 2018 and May 2021. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall from a height of one metre or less. Of the total fractures, 59% (n = 337) were treated nonoperatively, and of those patients treated with surgery, locked anterior-plate fixation was the preferred technique (79%; n = 180). Conclusion. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures treated at our major trauma centre replicated the classical bimodal distribution described in the literature. Patient age, open fractures, and fracture classification were factors correlated with the decision to treat the fracture operatively. While most fractures were treated nonoperatively, locked anterior-plate fixation remains the predominant method of fixation for fractures of the distal radius; this is despite questions and continued debate about the best method of surgical fixation for these injuries. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):623–627

Fractures of the distal radius are common, and form a considerable proportion of the trauma workload. We conducted a study to examine the patterns of injury and treatment for adult patients presenting with distal radius fractures to a major trauma centre serving an urban population. We undertook a retrospective cohort study to identify all patients treated at our major trauma centre for a distal radius fracture between 1 June 2018 and 1 May 2021. We reviewed the medical records and imaging for each patient to examine patterns of injury and treatment. We undertook a binomial logistic regression to produce a predictive model for operative fixation or inpatient admission. Overall, 571 fractures of the distal radius were treated at our centre during the study period. A total of 146 (26%) patients required an inpatient admission, and 385 surgical procedures for fractures of the distal radius were recorded between June 2018 and May 2021. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall from a height of one metre or less. Of the total fractures, 59% (n = 337) were treated nonoperatively, and of those patients treated with surgery, locked anterior-plate fixation was the preferred technique (79%; n = 180). The epidemiology of distal radius fractures treated at our major trauma centre replicated the classical bimodal distribution described in the literature. Patient age, open fractures, and fracture classification were factors correlated with the decision to treat the fracture operatively. While most fractures were

Premature growth arrests are an infrequent, yet a significant complication of physeal fractures of the distal radius in children and adolescents. Through early diagnosis, it is possible to prevent clinical repercussions of the anatomical and biomechanical alterations of the wrist. Their true incidence has not been well established, and there exists no consensual systematic monitoring plan for minimising its impacts. The main objective was to evaluate the prevalence of growth arrests after a physeal distal radius fracture. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors in order to better guide clinicians for a systematic follow-up. All patients seen between 2014–2016 in a tertiary orthopaedic clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were (one) a physeal fracture of the distal radius (two) adequate clinical/radiological follow-up. Descriptive, Chi-square and binary logistic regression analyses were carried out using SPSS software. One hundred ninety patients (mean age: 12 ± 2.8 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Forty percent (n=76) of the fractures were treated by closed reduction. Premature growth arrest was seen in 6.8% (n=13) and diagnosed at a mean of 10 months post trauma. The logistic regression showed that the initial translation percentage (>30%) (p 25) (p increase the risk of growth arrest. After adjusting for concomitant ipsilateral ulnar injuries, a positive association between physeal complications and fracture manipulation was detected (76.9%, p=0.03). A non-significant trend between premature growth arrest and associated ulnar injury was observed (p=0.054). No association was identified for trauma velocity, fracture type, gender and age, and growth complications. A prevalence of 6.8% of growth arrest was found after a physeal fracture of the distal radius. Fractures presenting with an initial coronal translation > 30% and/or angulation > 25 from normal, as well as those treated by manipulation, have been shown to be at risk for a premature growth arrest of the distal radius. This study highlights the importance of a systematic follow-up after a physeal fracture of the distal radius especially for patients with a more displaced fracture who had a closed reduction performed. An optimal follow-up period should be over 10 months to optimize the detection of growth arrest and treat it promptly, thereby minimizing negative clinical consequences

Aims. Describe a statistical and economic analysis plan for the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial 2 (DRAFFT2) randomized controlled trial. Methods. DRAFFT2 is a multicentre, parallel, two-arm randomized controlled trial. It compares surgical fixation with K-wires versus plaster cast in adult patients who have sustained a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius. The primary outcome measure is the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE, a validated assessment of wrist function and pain) at 12 months post-randomization. Secondary outcomes are measured at three, six, and 12 months after randomization and include the PWRE, EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L index and EQ-VAS (visual analogue scale), complication rate, and cost-effectiveness of the treatment. Results. This paper describes the full details of the planned methods of analysis and descriptive statistics. The DRAFFT2 study protocol has been published previously. Conclusion. The planned analysis strategy described records our intent to conduct statistical and within-trial cost-utility analyses. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:245–252

We aim to assess the AP distance and teardrop angles in a cohort of normal wrists and to assess their possible use as prognostic indicators in fractures of the distal radius. Two hundred standardised PA and lateral wrist radiographs from uninjured wrists and 95 patients with fractures of the distal radius were assessed and anatomic parameters measured, including the Teardrop angle and AP distance. Clinical assessment at a mean of 6 years post fracture included an assessment of grip strength and range of motion along with the DASH score. The mean teardrop angle in 200 normal wrists was 68 degrees (95%CI:67–69 degrees) and did not differ significantly between sexes (p=0.148). The average teardrop angle at presentation in 95 fractures of the distal radius was 47 degrees (95%CI:41–50 degrees), improving significantly to 58 degrees (95%CI:56–61 degrees, p< 0.0001) post-reduction, and this improvement was maintained at 56 degrees (95%CI:54–59 degrees) at union. The final position was significantly better than at presentation (p< 0.0001). Loss of teardrop angle between the fractured and uninjured wrist was significantly related to reduced grip strength (p=0.04) and worse DASH score (p=0.03). The mean AP distance in 200 normal wrists was 19.6mm (95%CI:19.4–19.9mm) in males and 17.6mm (95%CI:17.2–18.0mm) in females, which is significantly different (p< 0.0001). The mean AP Distance at presentation in 95 fractures of the distal radius was 21.0mm (95%CI:20.4–21.7mm), which improved significantly to 19.6 (95%CI:19.1–20.2mm, p< 0.0001), but subsequently worsened to 20.8mm (95%CI:20.2–20.4mm) at union. This is not significantly better than at presentation (p=0.397). An increase in AP distance in the fractured wrist correlated to loss of range of motion (p< 0.01). The value of these parameters is that they offer quite detailed assessment of the articular surface of the distal radius in the absence of more detailed imaging. They appear to be of prognostic value