Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 16 of 16
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 4 | Pages 234 - 240
3 Apr 2023
Poacher AT Froud JLJ Caterson J Crook DL Ramage G Marsh L Poacher G Carpenter EC

Aims. Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with improved outcomes of conservative treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a novel screening programme that included both the primary risk factors of breech presentation and family history, and the secondary risk factors of oligohydramnios and foot deformities. Methods. A five-year prospective registry study investigating every live birth in the study’s catchment area (n = 27,731), all of whom underwent screening for risk factors and examination at the newborn and six- to eight-week neonatal examination and review. DDH was diagnosed using ultrasonography and the Graf classification system, defined as grade IIb or above or rapidly regressing IIa disease (≥4. o. at four weeks follow-up). Multivariate odds ratios were calculated to establish significant association, and risk differences were calculated to provide quantifiable risk increase with DDH, positive predictive value was used as a measure of predictive efficacy. The cost-effectiveness of using these risk factors to predict DDH was evaluated using NHS tariffs (January 2021). Results. The prevalence of DDH that required treatment within our population was 5/1,000 live births. The rate of missed presentation of DDH was 0.43/1000 live births. Breech position, family history, oligohydramnios, and foot deformities demonstrated significant association with DDH (p < 0.0001). The presence of breech presentation increased the risk of DDH by 1.69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93% to 2.45%), family history by 3.57% (95% CI 2.06% to 5.09%), foot deformities by 8.95% (95% CI 4.81% to 13.1%), and oligohydramnios nby 11.6% (95 % CI 3.0% to 19.0%). Primary risk factors family history and breech presentation demonstrated an estimated cost-per-case detection of £6,276 and £11,409, respectively. Oligohydramnios and foot deformities demonstrated a cost-per-case detected less than the cost of primary risk factors of £2,260 and £2,670, respectively. Conclusion. The inclusion of secondary risk factors within a national screening programme was clinically successful as they were more cost and resource-efficient predictors of DDH than primary risk factors, suggesting they should be considered in the national guidance. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(4):234–240


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 5 - 5
3 Mar 2023
Poacher A Ramage G Froud J Carpenter C
Full Access

Introduction. There is little evidence surrounding the clinical implications of a diagnosis of IIa hip dysplasia with no consensus as to its efficacy as a predictor pathological dysplasia or treatment. Therefore, we evaluated the importance of categorising 2a hip dysplasia in to 2a- and 2a+ to better understand the clinical outcomes of each. Methods. A 9-year retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of type IIa hip dysplasia between 2011 – 2020 (n=341) in our centre. Ultrasound scans were graded using Graf's classification, assessment of management and DDH progression was completed through prospective data collection by the authors. Results. The prevalence of IIa hip dysplasia within our population was 6.7/1000 live births. There was significantly higher incidence of treatment in the IIa- (31.4%, n=17/54) group when compared to the 2a+ group (10%, n=28/287), (p<0.01). In those that had an abnormality (torticollis and/or foot abnormality) treatment rates (24% n=7/29) were significantly (p<0.05) higher than those without anatomical abnormality (15%, n=48/312). Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the significant clinical impact of a IIa- diagnosis on progression to pathological dysplasia and therefore higher rates of treatment in IIa- hips. Furthermore, we have demonstrated the importance of detection of IIa hips through a national screening program, to allow for timely intervention to prevent missing the acetabular maturation window. Therefore, it is our recommendation that all patients with additional anatomical abnormalities and those with a diagnosis of type IIa- hip dysplasia be considered for immediate treatment or urgent follow up following their diagnosis to prevent late conservative intervention


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 593 - 593
1 Oct 2010
Dornacher D Nelitz M Reichel H
Full Access

Reduction therapy in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is initialized in the newborn period. Harness treatment is continued until normal ultrasound-values are reached. Above the age of one year the assessment of DDH relies mainly on interpretation of plain radiographs of the pelvis. In order to rule out residual dysplasia after ultrasound controlled treatment radiological control is advised to the time children start walking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early radiological outcome after ultrasound controlled treatment of DDH and to examine whether there is a correlation between the initial severitiy of DDH, measured by ultrasound, and the severity of residual DDH on the radiograph at the time of the first follow-up. A. p. pelvic radiographs of 90 children (72 girls, 18 boys, 180 hips) with DDH (29 unilateral, 61 bilateral) were reviewed retrospectively. To the beginning of the ultrasound surveilled therapy (mean age 7,2 weeks) the morphologic findings were staged according to the Graf classification. Ultrasound surveilled abduction treatment was continued until normal ultrasound findings were reached. To the time children started walking (mean age 14,8 months) an a. p. radiograph of the pelvis was performed. The acetabular index (AI) was measured and classified according to the normal values of the hip joint described by Tönnis. The initial ultrasound findings expressed by the Graf classification were compared with the AI in the radiographic follow-up and Tönnis’ normal values. To simplify matters the 180 Graf-classified hips were distributed into 4 categories: Graf Ia/b=category 1, Graf IIa-D=category 2, Graf IIIa/b=category 3, Graf IV=category 4. The initially normal contralateral hips in ultrasound (n=29, category 1) presented in 37,9% a normal AI, in 41,4% with a mild dysplasia (between 1SD and 2SD) and in 20,7% with a severe dysplasia (beyond 2SD). The Graf type IIa-D hips (n=81, category 2) presented in 37% a normal AI, 32,1% showed a mild dysplasia and 30,9% a severe dysplasia. The Graf type III a/b hips (n=60, category 3) showed 35%, 30% and 35%, Graf type IV hips (n=10, category 4) 60%, 30% and 10%, respectively. The mean AI in all four categories differed only marginally. In our setting of patients different conclusions can be drawn:. Even after successful ultrasound guided therapy with a sonographically normal hip at the time bracing is finished there is a risk for residual dysplasia. Therefore radiological follow-up of every once treated hip is necessary. To reduce the number of radiographs the time for the first radiographic follow up may be delayed to the age of two. We only see a minimal risk to miss a dislocated hip in time. In very rare cases the indication for an acetabuloplasty is generally seen before the age of two, in our patient population we saw no immediate indication for surgery


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Jun 2017
Nie K Rymaruk S Paton R
Full Access

Purpose. This 20-year prospective longitudinal observational study aims to determine the incidence of pathological developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children referred with clicky hips and define the risk posed to inform neonatal hip screening programmes including the role of ultrasound. Method. 355 children from 1997 to 2016 were referred with clicky hips to our “one stop” paediatric hip clinic under the local neonatal hip screening programme. Hips were assessed clinically for instability and by ultrasound using a simplified Graf classification. Dislocated or dislocatable hips were classed as Graf type IV. Results. The mean age at presentation was 13.9 (1–56) weeks. 343 out of 355 (96.6%) were Graf type I which required no treatment. 9 (2.5%) were Graf type II but all converted to Graf type I on follow up scans. 2 (0.6%) had Graf type III dysplasia and 1 (0.3%) had irreducible dislocation but all three were associated with limited hip abduction or other hip pathology. Referrals increased from 12.9 to 22.6 per year (p=0.002) from first decade of the study to the second, driven by rising primary care referrals (5.5 vs. 16.5 per year p=0.00002). Conclusion. The study provided robust evidence that overwhelming majority of clicky hips required no treatment other than reassurance to parents. Clicky hips with normal hip examination should be considered a variant of normal childhood and not a risk factor for DDH. However clicky hips with limited hip abduction may represent a separate clinical entity at risk of hip pathology and therefore warrant further investigations


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 8
2 Jan 2024
Husum H Hellfritzsch MB Maimburg RD Møller-Madsen B Henriksen M Lapitskaya N Kold S Rahbek O

Aims

The present study seeks to investigate the correlation of pubofemoral distances (PFD) to α angles, and hip displaceability status, defined as femoral head coverage (FHC) or FHC during manual provocation of the newborn hip < 50%.

Methods

We retrospectively included all newborns referred for ultrasound screening at our institution based on primary risk factor, clinical, and PFD screening. α angles, PFD, FHC, and FHC at follow-up ultrasound for referred newborns were measured and compared using scatter plots, linear regression, paired t-test, and box-plots.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_21 | Pages 42 - 42
1 Dec 2016
Schaeffer E Quader N Mulpuri K Cooper A Hodgson A Abugharbieh R
Full Access

Ultrasound (US) is the standard imaging modality used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. Currently, radiologists or orthopaedic surgeons review scan images and judge them to be adequate or inadequate for interpretation. If considered adequate, diagnostic dysplasia metrics are determined; however, there is no standardised method for this process. There is significant inter-observer variability in this manual process which can affect misdiagnosis rates. To eliminate this subjectivity, we developed an automatic method to identify adequate US images and extract dysplasia metrics. The purpose of this study was to validate the efficacy of this automatic method by comparing results with observer-determined dysplasia metrics on a set of US images. A total of 693 US images from scans of 35 infants were analysed. Trained clinicians at a single institution labeled each image as adequate or inadequate, and subsequently measured alpha and beta angles on adequate images to diagnose dysplasia. We trained our image classifier on random sets of 415 images and used it to assess the remaining 278 images. Alpha and beta angles were automatically estimated on all adequate images. We compared the manual and automatic methods for discrepancies in adequacy determination, metric variability and incidences of missed early diagnosis or over-treatment. There was excellent agreement between the automatic and manual methods in image adequacy classification (Kappa coefficient = 0.912). On each adequate US image, alpha and beta angle measurements were compared, producing mixed levels of agreement between methods. Mean discrepancies of 1.78°±4.72° and 8.91°±6.437° were seen for alpha and beta angles, respectively. Standard deviations of the angle measures across multiple images from a single patient scan were significantly reduced by the automatic method for both alpha (p<0.05) and beta (p<0.01) angles. Additionally, the automatic method classified three hips (two patients) as Graf type II and two hips (two patients) as type III, while the manual method classified them as type I and II, respectively. Both cases flagged as type III patients by the automatic system subsequently failed Pavlik harness treatment and were booked for surgery. The automatic method produced excellent agreement with radiologists in scan adequacy classification and significantly reduced measurement variability. Good agreement between methods was found in Graf classification. In instances of disagreement, subsequent clinical findings seemed to support the classification of the automatic method. This proposed method presents an alternative automatic, near-real-time analysis for US images that may potentially significantly improve dysplasia metric reliability and reduce missed early diagnoses without increasing over-treatment


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 522 - 522
1 Aug 2008
Sloan AG Hinduja K Paton RW
Full Access

Purpose of study: Recent literature suggests the mode of delivery; either normal vaginal delivery (NVD) or caesarean section (LSCS) influences the incidence of DDH for term breech infants. This study examines whether the incidence of DDH amongst term breech infants is related to the mode of delivery. Methods: All term infants born breech between 1. st. April 1995 and 31. st. March 2002 were included. All infants who presented breech were screened by ultrasound as part of an ongoing longitudinal cohort study. Data regarding mode of delivery, either NVD or LSCS elective or LSCS emergency was obtained from hospital records. DDH is a spectrum from minor dysplasia to dislocated irreducible hips. DDH was recorded according to the modified Graf classification. Results: During the 7-year period 25,919 infants were born in the study population. 996 infants presented as breech, fulfilling the inclusion criteria. 164 (16.5%) were normal vaginal deliveries. 167 (16.8%) had emergency caesarean section. 664 (66.7%) had elective caesarean section. In total 48 patients were diagnosed with DDH. 10 patients had bilateral DDH giving a total of 58 dysplastic hips. Conclusions: Infants delivered by normal vaginal delivery or emergency caesarean section had a significantly higher incidence of DDH than those delivered by elective caesarean section. This study suggests that the mode of delivery does influence the stability of hips in infants lying breech at term


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 270 - 270
1 Mar 2003
Meda P Garg N Davies R Pilling D Bruce C
Full Access

This study shows the efficacy of The Pavlik harness for the treatment of Development Dysplasia of Hip using ultrasonographic monitoring. Between March 1995 and February 2000 we treated 149 dysplastic hips in 117 babies. According to the Graf’s classification 90 were dysplastic type IIB, IIC,IID hips; 59 were dislocated Type IIIA, IIIB and IV hips. Babies were regularly monitored using ultrasound until the age of 26 weeks and radiographs there after for bony roof angle. The Pavlik harness was abandoned if there was persistent dislocation of hip at the end of 3 weeks of treatment. The average full time harness treatment was 12.2 ( range 6–20 ) weeks. The average follow up was 55 ( range 30–90 ) months. The harness failed to reduce 14 hips ( 9.5 % of total hips). These required arthrogram and closed or open reductions. Late presentation beyond 12 weeks and a higher grade on the Graf’s classification reduces the success rate of the pavlik harness treatment. Two cases continue to show a small femoral ossific nuclei at 30 months follow up. The hips treated successfully showed no significant difference in acetabular index from the normal values at follow up radiographs. We conclude that using our protocol, successful initial treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip with the Pavlik harness appears to restore normal development of the hip. We continue to monitor patients by regular radiological surveillance up to 3 years in dysplastic hips and 5 years in unstable and dislocated hips


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 267 - 267
1 May 2006
Forder J Mathew S Cornell M
Full Access

Introduction: Ideally any screening system should use a simple reliable test with good intraobserver reproducibility. This is important in DDH as once there is an established abnormality surgical intervention is frequently required. The aim of early detection (within six weeks) is to increase the number of children that may be treated nonoperatively. We have evaluated the effectiveness of our selective screening program by determining the late presentation rate of DDH in our region. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2003 we looked retrospectively at all patients presenting with DDH in our region. We recorded their age at scan and presentation, the Graf classification if recorded, their management, the presence of risk factors for DDH, referral source and presence of a positive clinical examination. All these were entered into a database and analyzed specifically with regard to patients presenting late. Results: In the period between January 2001 and June 2002 prior to selective ultrasound screening (Group 1) there were 9441 live births and 26 cases of DDH (incidence of 2.75). There were 11 late presenters with an incidence of 1.12 per 1000 per year. Between July 2002 and December 2003 (Group 2) there were 9428 live births and 20 cases of DDH (incidence of 2.12). There were 3 late presenters with an incidence of 0.3 per 1000 per year. Discussion: We have shown that a program of selective ultrasound screening in our region has decreased the number of children presenting late with DDH. It must be remembered however, that in the absence of any risk factors, clinical examination remains critical in identifying those with DDH in a selective screening program


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 334 - 334
1 May 2010
Hipmair G Hochgatterer R Ziernhöld M Ruhs B Größbötzl G Greissler W Böhler N
Full Access

Introduction: 1986 we started with ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) in all newborn children from our hospital. In 1995 an regime was investigated we developed out of our expieriences of the previous years and started a prospective study. Material and methods: In the period 1995 to 2006 we did ultrasound screening in newborn babies within the first week of life. There were 14744 ultrasound checkups in 7372 children. Following the classification of Graf we had 7213 children with stage Ia,Ib or IIa. In 159 children (2,15%) we saw a ultrasound measurement stage IIc or worse (D,IIIa/b; IV a/b) which was an indication for treatment with the Pavlik bandage. Over all we treated 203 dysplastic hips with our regime. By dedecting a congenital dislocated hip we applyed the Pavlik harness immediately after diagnosis in 110 degrees of flection an 45 degrees of abduction. The fist controll reviewing the compliance of the parents and the setting of the bandage was 10 to 14 days after starting treatment. Every 10 to 14 days we did bandage checks combined with ultrasound controlls. We stopped treatment with the pavlik harness when the ultrasound showed a mature, well developed picture of both hips compared to Graf stage Ia/b. Results: We treated 159 newborn with 203 dislocated hips. There were 131 (82.4%) female an 28 (17.6)% male patients. 100 right (49.5%) and in 103 left (50.5%) hips. The distribution following Graf classification were 150 for typ IIc (73.9%), 18 for type D (8.9%), 31 for type IIIa/b (15.3%) and 4 type IVa/b (1.9%). Summerizing there were 150 hips, stage IIc (73,9%), to be at risk to develope an luxation, but 53 (26,1%) hips were already luxated at the moment of birth. The average treatment time over all was 53 days (7,6 (3–26) weeks). Subdividing the groups the treatment period for stage IIc was in mean 7.6 weeks, for stage D 7.1 weeks, for stage III a/b 9.5 weeks and for stage IV a/b 9 week. We had a lost to follow up in 4 (1,81%) patients (3 times compliance problems with the parents at stage II a in both sides). Once we had to treat with a so called Fettweiss-cast after one week of therapy because the baby was to small for the bandage but in the other cases there was no need für additional methodes of treatment. At no time we ever had a degradation of the disease. Furthermore we had no necrosis of the femoral head in our study population. Conclusion: The treatment with the Pavlik bandage of the CDH in every stage in newborn was possible and showed good result in 203 hips. To establish a standardised therapy you have to do an area-wide ultrasound screening as well as an consistently follow up of your therapy


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 8 | Pages 635 - 642
23 Aug 2023
Poacher AT Hathaway I Crook DL Froud JLJ Scourfield L James C Horner M Carpenter EC

Aims

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be managed effectively with non-surgical interventions when diagnosed early. However, the likelihood of surgical intervention increases with a late presentation. Therefore, an effective screening programme is essential to prevent late diagnosis and reduce surgical morbidity in the population.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological literature from the last 25 years in the UK. Articles were selected from databases searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane; 13 papers met the inclusion criteria.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 8 | Pages 594 - 598
3 Aug 2021
Arneill M Cosgrove A Robinson E

Aims

To determine the likelihood of achieving a successful closed reduction (CR) of a dislocated hip in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after failed Pavlik harness treatment We report the rate of avascular necrosis (AVN) and the need for further surgical procedures.

Methods

Data was obtained from the Northern Ireland DDH database. All children who underwent an attempted closed reduction between 2011 and 2016 were identified. Children with a dislocated hip that failed Pavlik harness treatment were included in the study. Successful closed reduction was defined as a hip that reduced in theatre and remained reduced. Most recent imaging was assessed for the presence of AVN using the Kalamchi and MacEwen classification.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 349 - 349
1 Nov 2002
Czubak J
Full Access

There is a very long way from diagnosis to treatment of the developmental dysplasia of the hip. Everything is complex: clinical examination is subtle and requires a long training. Treatment is not as simple as could be thought. The risks include approximate examinations and of standard, ready-made ones. The discussion has not been settled as to whether all children with hip instability can be clinically detected at birth. The complexity of the problem arises from the fact that only 10% of children who have instability at birth develop long-term problems if they are left untreated. It is well known, affirmed by several different studies that at birth the incidence of hip instability in approximately 1–4% of patients, with figure being higher in girls. There is also a consensus that a large majority of these unstable hips will become stable during the first few days of life, even without treatment. What is not known, however, is how many of those hip that become stable will become completely normal as the child grows. These two fundamental issues are of the utmost importance. They emphasize the significance of early examination (first 48 hours) in order to detect instability and employ careful follow-up of any newborn in whom hip instability has been identified. Some children are at particular risk of hip instability. Those infants are labeled as “high risk”. They include children born in families with hip instability, those presented by breech, first born children or products of oligohydramniotic pregnancies, particularly girls, those with the generalized joint laxity, those with torticollis and scoliosis, those with foot deformities and increased birth-weight over 4000g. Whilst all children should be screened at birth by a doctor experienced in clinical examination with particular attention directed to those children, who are considered high risk. It must be emphasized that clinical examination is the most important for the detection of hip instability in newborns. Clinical examination should be very delicate, gentle, based on feelings rather than signs. Clinically, hip instability can be divided into: 1. irreducible dislocation, 2. reducible dislocation, 3. dislocatability, 4. subluxability. The clinical tests of instability were described by Ortolani and Barlow. Fully dislocated irreducible hip is a very rare condition and may be associated with neuromuscular abnormality. It represents dislocation well before delivery. In this form acetabulum is vacant, femoral head palpable posteriorly. There are no singns of Ortolani and Barlow tests. We can only find the sings of “pump”, which means there exists a movement along the long axis of the leg. This is the most severe pathology of the hip in DDH.The reducible dislocation is characterized by the Ortolani maneuver. With the hip flexed 90 degrees, we abduct the hip and than we feel and hear the click which is the sign of the reduction of the hip. Dislocatable and subluxatable are the most common types of pathology of the hip in DDH. This deformity arises at the end of pregnancy. This is characterized by positive Barlow test, which is the provoked-dislocation test. Using it we can dislocate or subluxate the hip. It is very rare to find restricted hip movements in newborns. The limited abduction of the affected hip is the sign typical for older children, more the 3 months of age. It is crucial to repeat the clinical examination even during the same office visit. Ultrasonography has changed our diagnostic ability for DDH. These direct examinations help us in hip evaluation in the first days of the newborn period. The exact Graf classification and methodology makes possible to classify all types of hip pathology irrespective of the examiner. Another important feature of ultrasonography is the ability to monitor the treatment not only in newborn period. How to start with the prevention of DDH in newborn period? There is no any really good screening without collaboration of orthopedics surgeons and pediatricians. To achieve this, we must control our own environment, especially maternity hospitals and constantly keep pediatricians, pediatric nurses and obstetricians informed. There is no consensus in screening programs – general or limited. I personally recommend limited program. All newborns should be examined clinically after the delivery. The infants with positive or doubtful clinical signs and those with signs of high risk should be examined ultrasonographically immediately after delivery within first 2 weeks. The other children should be screened ultrasonographically at the time when most of the hips are mature enough. It is important, that if we live in the region with high percentage of late detected DDH (more than 3 months of age) the general clinical and ultasonographical screening program should be used


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 146 - 146
1 Sep 2012
Naqvi G Malik S Adamec O
Full Access

Aim. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of clinic based ultrasound screening by Orthopaedic surgeon for early diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH) in one stop clinic. Methods. This prospective study included 395 infants (185 male and 210 female) (5.2% of study population) who were referred for screening on the basis of abnormal findings or the presence of risk factors for DDH. Average age was 12.5 weeks (1 day to 15 months). All infants were assessed for risk factors of DDH. Clinical examinations were performed by the senior author followed by ultrasonography of both of the infant's hips, using the Graf's technique. Alpha and beta angles were calculated and hips were classified according to Graf's classification system. Results. Out of 790 hips examined 670 (84.8%) were labelled as normal. 120 (15.1%) hips in 84 patients were diagnosed as dysplastic or dislocated. Clinical examination only detected 39 patients out of 84, sensitivity of 46%. Average age of diagnosis was 12 weeks (3days-11 months). 79 patients were successfully treated with pavlic harness, 2 required traction and 3 were referred for surgical treatment. There were 14 cases of late diagnosis during one year period (> 4 months of age) (1.8/1000). Conclusion. Selective ultrasound screening is effective in early diagnosis of DDH and significantly reduces the duration of non operative treatment as well as the need for surgical intervention but does not completely eliminate late diagnosis of DDH. We find the concept of one stop DDH clinic highly effective and recommend that ultrasound training should be a part of orthopaedic curriculum


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 121 - 121
1 Mar 2006
Synder M Niedzielski K Drobniewski M
Full Access

Introduction: Late diagnosed developmental dysplasia of the hip joint (DDH) is now a very rare case in an orthopaedic practice. It is mostly because of early ultrasound screenings of baby’s hips. Two ultrasound techniques are most popular and widely used in the world – the Graf’s technique in Europe and Harcke’s in the USA. The purpose of this study was to establish a value of Harcke’s technique which is not very popular in Europe. Material and Methods: During the last 10 years, 25 000 ultrasound hip examinations of newborns hips because of early DDH screening were performed in our Clinic. In every child both hips were examined using two techniques (Graf’s and Harcke’s). The mean age during the first hip ultrasound examination was 5 weeks (from 10 days to 8 weeks). The Siemens SL1 equipment with linear transducer of 7.5 MHz was used for examination. The position of the hip during examination followed all requirements indicated by Graf or Harcke. All ultrasound examination were performed and analyzed by two orthopaedic surgeons. Results: In this study the DDH was diagnosed in 5,6% of all examined hips. Most common type of dysplastic hip was type II according to Graf’s classification, or laxity with stress according to Harcke’s classification. The cases with decentration (subluxation or dislocation) were diagnosed in 2% of all dysplastic hips. In Graf’s technique there were some differences in measuring the beta or alfa angles between examiners, however, this did not influenced the type of hip dysplasia. Harcke’s method was easy to perform because the measuring of the angles was not necessary. The time which was required for examination of a child’s hips did not extend 2 minutes. Conclusions: Both methods are very useful in early diagnosis of DDH and could be used for general hip screening for newborn hips. Harcke’s method gives a better visualization of the hip in two planes and gives dynamic pictures


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 349 - 350
1 Nov 2002
Cigala F Lotito F De Felice D
Full Access

The D.D.H screening programme until the second half of ’80 was based on the clinical Ortolani-Barlow’s manoeuvre at newborn age and by xray examination of the pelvis at three – four month old to discover hip joint anomalies that could be address at a future dislocation. Never less the so-called Dislocation of the Hip was a quite common pathology around Europe. The close reduction of a dislocated hip has been the treatment of choice in order to attempt to reduce a dislocated hip without surgical operation. Close reduction was preferred to be obtained after a period of skin traction on bed, at which a special frame were added, to perform a progressive gentle reduction gaining, in an average of three weeks time, complete abduction before applying a spica cast. Two main methods were used: reduction with the hips extended, abducted and internal rotated according to Sommerville- Petit and reduction in over head position with the hips flexed, abducted and external rotated. These two systems were designed to decrease the Avascular Necrosis of the femoral head that often occurs if the reduction was obtained during a sudden manoeuvre under general anaesthesia. Generally the correct position of the femoral head into the acetabular socket, at the moment to apply the plaster, was assessed by an arthrogram, to avoid the bad surprise of further dislocation due to false reduction after the traction period. The child so treated had to be followed during her/his growth to assess the development of acetabular roof and the position of the femoral head linked at the antiversion of the femoral neck. Any hip joint, in which acetabular index do not improve during growth, needs acetabular and femoral osteotomies to overcome these anatomical defects as cause of a persisting genetic defect. At the end of ’80, a deep change of the natural history of D.D.H. in Italy is related to the introduction of screening programme based on accurate clinical examination of the hip of the babies at the nursery, selection of babies with risk signs of D:D.H. such as clinical anomalies, instability of the hip at Ortolani-Barlow’s, familiarity for D.D.H. and breech delivery. The hips of those babies are immediately assessed by ultrasonographic examination according to Graf’s method. The general population, on the contrary, is examined by US between the second and the third months of age. The National Health Service encourages the US screening paying its cost. In this way the incidence of late-D.D.H. and late-dislocation is enormously decreased and the outcome of the pathology has been improved. The conservative treatment of the hip affected by different grade of anomalies early discovered trough US examination, in fact, are treated by simple harness in abduction for mild dyspalsia to plaster spica cast in human position if the hip is severely unstable and Ortolani positive. There are same rare cases of true Congenital Dislocation at birth that can not be conservatively reduced and it will be necessary to perform a open reduction generally when the ossified nucleus of femoral head appeares. Our experience:. From 1975, when our Children Orthopaedic Department was created in the Medical School of “Federico II” University of Naples and the first authors become the Chief, we admitted 374 patients affected by dislocation of the hip (F=308 – M= 66 F:M= 5:1) with a mean age of 7 and half months (min.4 mths.– max 20 mths). All these patients were put in traction on the Morel’s bed in order to attempt a close reduction in extended, abducted and internal rotated position according to Sommerville- Petit method. Average time of traction was 25 days (min. 7 max 38). 120 patients were undergone at an arthrographic examination in general anaesthesia. 46 patients did not achieve the reduction and were operated on. A spica cast were applied for 60 days followed by an harness in abduction. Total amount of time of treatment was a mean of 7 months (min 110 days max. 12 months). Residual dysplasia was observed in 48 patients that needed a further surgical procedure. The number of inpatient affected by D.D.H. were an average of 21 per year until 1990 to drop dramatically at 3 per year in the last decade. On the other hand the D.D.H. outpatient clinic increased. The selected babies examined were 6930 at an average age of 4 months old. All the babies were undergone to clinical and Us examination and classified according to Graf. Hip anomalies were seen in 630 babies. The treatment was related to clinical and Us observation. Simple abduction pillow or simple harness in abduction were used in hip clinically negative at Ortolani-Barlow’s manoeuvre and 2c or 2b type according to Graf.’s classification. Milgram harness or Coxaflex harness (Thamert –Burgwedel –Germany) or plaster spica cast in “human position” were applied in instable hip type D or worse and clinically positive at Ortolani-Barlow manoeuvre. 25 patients were hospitalised because affected by irreducible hip. Conclusion:. The experience that we have done over decades in treatment of D.D.H. confirms the assumption of Treadwell and Bell (1981) that claimed that D.D.H. screening deeply changed the natural history of D.D.H. The problem was to find a good screening test helpful to diagnose as soon as possible a pathological hip. Graf’s method, after a decade of scientific criticism, can be elected at a worth method to screen an infant hip. Screening program based on ultrasound and clinical examination decreases hospitalisation, cost and sequels of D.D.H. in term of surgical operation and degenerative arthritis of hip joint at least at a medium follow up. The hip that need to be hospitalised are the true congenital dislocated hip for which early diagnosis probably should not effect their clinical history. A danger is hidden in US screening. Ultrasonography has to be performed by a skill examiner and it has to be implemented by careful clinical examination with anamnestic recording of the data in order to obtain the best result of the D.D.H. screening program