This study was to analyze the minimum ten years clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasties using allogenic impaction bone graft and cemented cup in acetabular bone deficiency.

Fifty two revision total hip arthroplasties that had been performed in forty nine patients between March 1992 and June 1997 and had followed more than minimum ten years were included in this study. The clinical and radiological results were evaluated by Harris hip score and roentgenography including anterior-posterior view of pelvis and lateral view of operated hip.

The mean Harris hip score was 47 points preoperatively, 81 points at three years, 84 points at seven years, and 82 points at ten years after revision. In radiological evaluation, osseous union between grafted bone and host bone was seen within four months in 47 hips, a complete grafted bone-cement radiolucent line of two millimeter or more in at least one zone was seen in 5 hips at two years, 7 hips at seven years, and 2 hip at 10 years follow-up.

We recommend the technique using allogenic impaction bone graft and cemented cup to reconstruct the acetabular cavitary defect in revision total hip arthroplasties.

Introduction. When ankle arthroplasty fails the options are revision to arthrodesis or revision to arthroplasty. We report early outcomes of revision procedures for failed total replacement. Methods. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data including post-operative complications, union, survivorship and PROMS scores to compare revision to arthrodesis and revision to arthroplasty. Results. 31 revision procedures (10 revision to arthrodesis and 21 revision to arthroplasty) were performed for failed primary ankle arthroplasty (30 patients) between January 2012 and June 2019. 23 males: 8 females, average age of 68. Indications for revisions were aseptic loosening (13), cysts/lysis (6), pain (5), periprosthetic infection (3), fracture (2), fibula erosion (1), polyethylene dislocation (1). Union rate following arthrodesis was 77.9% after primary revision procedure. Impaction bone grafting technique was utilised in seven patients with a union rate of 83%. Survivorship following revision to arthroplasty was 100% at two years; 87.5% at three years and 75% at four years Failed revision arthroplasty was revised to arthrodesis successfully. Median MOxFQ was 73.5 for the arthrodesis group versus 17 in the arthroplasty group (p=0.02). Median AOS was 87 for the arthrodesis group versus 12 for the arthroplasty group (p=0.04). Discussion. This study demonstrated the potential advantages in the short term of revision arthroplasty over conversion to arthrodesis with statistically significant improvements in MOxFQ and AOS within the first two years following revision

Acetabular bone loss is a problem in primary and revision Total Hip Joint Replacement (THJR). Impaction bone grafting is one method of dealing with this problem. We looked at the results of two surgeons who use this method at North Shore Hospital, Auckland. A retrospective study was carried out on all patients who had acetabular impaction bone grafting carried out as part of THJR, whether primary or revision. All operations were performed by two surgeons, Mr Rob Sharp and Mr Bill Farrington. Patients were assessed in clinic at varying time intervals post grafting, and were functionally scored. 33 patients underwent impaction grafting, a total of 35 acetabular grafts. Of these the male to female ratio was 16:17, and the mean age range was 46–82 years. Average Harris hip score was 79 (Min 54 Max 95), and the average Oxford score was 39 (min 13 Max 48). There was one failure, 3 dislocations, and1 sciatic nerve palsy. Impaction bone grafting is one method, which can be utilised to reconstruct acetabular bone loss, with the additional advantage of restoring bone stock. We found high rates of patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate

Introduction: Revision hip surgery is predicted to rise significantly over the coming decades. There is therefore likely to be an increasing need to overcome the large bone loss and cavitatory defects encountered in failed primary hip replacements. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) is a recognised technique for replacing lost bone stock. Achieving optimal graft impaction is a difficult surgical skill with a significant learning curve, balancing the need to achieve sufficient compaction to provide primary stability versus the need to keep impaction forces to a minimum to prevent iatrogenic fracture. In this study we have developed a revision acetabular model to test the hypothesis that the use of vibration and drainage with a new custom made perforated tamp could reduce the peak stresses imparted to the acetabulum during the impaction process and also improve the reliability and reproducibility of the impaction technique. Methods: Composite Sawbone hemi Pelvis models were used, with identical contained cavitatory defects created (Paprosky Type 2a). A strain gauge was attached to the medial wall of each hemi pelvis. A custom set of IBG tamps were made, and coupled a pneumatic hammer used to generate the vibrations. A standard impaction technique was used for the control group and the new vibration impaction for the experimental group. The cavity was progressively filled with morsellised allograft in 6 set steps for both groups with strain gauge readings taken during all impaction to monitor peak stresses. A standard Exeter Contemporary cup was then cemented into the graft bed for both groups. The models were mechanically loaded according to the protocol developed by Westphal et al at the angle of the joint reaction force during heel strike for a total of 50 000 cycles. 3D assessment of any micro motion post mechanical testing and degree of graft compaction was done with high resolution micro CT. Results: Vibration impaction lead to a significant reduction in the peak stresses during the impaction process throughout the 6 steps (e.g. Step 1: 34.6 vs 110.8 MPa p=0.03). There was also far less variability in the peak stresses in the vibration group compared to standard impaction both in sequential impactions by the same surgeon and between different surgeons. One medial wall fracture occurred in the control group only. There was no difference in the degree of graft compaction or in the subsidence of the implant post cyclical loading. Conclusion: Impaction bone grafting can be a difficult surgical skill with a significant learning curve. We believe that this new technique of applying vibration coupled with drainage to the IBG process in the acetabulum can reduce the risk of intraoperative fracture whilst achieving good graft compaction and implant stability. This technique therefore has the potential to widen the ‘safety margins’ of IBG and reduce the learning curve allowing more widespread adoption of the technique for replacing lost bone stock

Introduction. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) is a reliable technique for acetabular revision surgery with large segmental defects. However, bone graft resorption and cup migration are some of the limitations of this tecnique. We assess frequency and outcome of these complications in a large acetabular IBG series. Patients and Methods. We analysed 330 consecutive hips that received acetabular IBG and a cemented cup in revision surgery with large bone defects (Paprosky types 3A and 3B). Fresh-frozen femoral head allograft was morselized manually. The mean follow-up was 17 years (3–26). All data were prospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Changes in different paremeters regarding cup position were assessed pre- and postoperatively and at the follow- up controls. Only variations greater than 5º and 3 mm were considered. Results. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 48.3+8.5 to 84.6+12.8 at final follow-up. The radiological analysis showed cup migration in 42 hips. The mean appearance time was 4.3 years (range, 1–25). Migration was progressive and painful in 27 hips (67.5%) requiring cup revision. Lateral mesh was more frequently associated with migrated cups (p=0.034). Cup tilt was found in 37 out 42 migrated cups, however cranial migration was more frequent in progressive migrated cups (p=0.02). There were 34 re-revisions, 27 due to aseptic cup loosening, 6 due to dislocation and one due to infection. The survival rate for any cause at 16 years was 81.2% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 74.0 to 88.4) and for aseptic cup loosening was 83.4% (95% CI: 76.2–90.6). In all surviving hips trabecular incorporation was observed without radiolucent lines. Conclusions. IBG continues to be a reliable technique for large defects in acetabular revision surgery. Bone graft resorption and cup migration was not frequent in this large series and one-third of cases were not progressive. Cup migration was more frequent in cases with a segmental roof defect in which a lateral mesh was used

Femoral revision after cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) might include technical difficulties, following essential cement removal, which might lead to further loss of bone and consequently inadequate fixation of the subsequent revision stem. Bone loss may occur because of implant loosening or polyethylene wear, and should be addressed at time of revision surgery. Stem revision can be performed with modular cementless reconstruction stems involving the diaphysis for fixation, or alternatively with restoration of the bone stock of the proximal femur with the use of allografts. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) has been widely used in revision surgery for the acetabulum, and subsequently for the femur in Paprosky defects Type 1 or 2. In combination with a regular length cemented stem, impaction grafting allows for restoration of femoral bone stock through incorporation and remodeling of the proximal femur. Cavitary bone defects affecting the metaphysis and partly the diaphysis leading to a wide femoral canal are ideal indications for this technique. In case of combined segmental-cavitary defects a metal mesh is used to contain the defect which is then filled and impacted with bone grafts. Cancellous allograft bone chips of 2 to 4 mm size are used, and tapered into the canal with rods of increasing diameters. To impact the bone chips into the femoral canal a dummy of the dimensions of the definitive cemented stem is inserted and tapped into the femur to ensure that the chips are firmly impacted. Finally, a standard stem is implanted into the newly created medullary canal using bone cement. To date several studies from Europe have shown favorable results with this technique, with some excellent long-term results reported. Advantages of IBG include the restoration of the bone stock in the proximal femur, the use of standard length cemented stems and preserving the diaphysis for re-revision. As disadvantages of the technique: longer surgical time, increased blood loss and the necessity of a bone bank can be mentioned

Background. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) using a circumferential metal mesh is one of the options that allow restoration of the femoral bone stock and stability of the implant in hip arthroplasty. Here we examined the clinical and radiographic outcome of this procedure with a cemented stem and analyzed experimentally the initial stability of mesh–grafted bone–cemented stem complexes. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 6 hips (6 patients) that had undergone femoral revisions with a circumferential metal mesh, impacted bone allografts, and a cemented stem. The mean follow-up period was 2.9 years (range, 1.4–3.8 years). Hip joint function was evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score, and radiographic changes were determined from radiographs. The initial resistance of cemented stem complexes to axial and rotational force was measured in a composite bone model with various segmental losses of the proximal femur. Results. The hip score improved from 50 (range, 10–84) preoperatively to a mean of 74 (range, 67–88) at the final follow-up. The overall implant survival rate was 100% at 4 years when radiological loosening or revision for any reason was used as the endpoint. No stem subsided more than 3 mm vertically within 1 year after implantation. Computed tomography showed reconstitution of the femoral canal in a metal mesh. In mechanical analyses, there was no influence on the stem stability to axial compression during the repeated axial compression test between IBG reconstruction rates. On the other hand, for IBG reconstruction rate of 66.7%, grafted bone-Sawbone juntion was buckled under the axial breaking force. In contrast, under rotational load, the rotation angles of the stainless mesh were strongly affected by the IBG reconstruction rate. Conclusions. The short-term results show good outcomes for reconstruction of proximal bone loss with impaction bone allografts and a circumferential mesh. The procedure should be applied in cases where the circumferential proximal bone loss is less than half of the stem length implanted

Introduction. Impaction bone grafting for reconstitution of acetabular bone stock in revision hip surgery has been used for nearly 30 years. We report results in a group of patients upon whom data has been collected prospectively with a minimum ten year follow-up. Material and Methods. Acetabular impaction grafting was performed in 305 hips in 293 patients revised for aseptic loosening between 1995 and 2001. In this series 33% of cases required stainless steel meshes to reconstruct medial wall or rim defects prior to graft impaction. These meshes were the the only implants used for this purpose in this series. All Paprosky grades of defect were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected in surviving patients at a minimum of 10 years following the index operation; mean follow-up was 12.4 years (SD 1.5; range 10.0–16.0). Results. Kaplan-Meier survivorship with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 86% (95% CI 81.1 to 90.9%). Clinical scores for pain relief and function remained satisfactory (mean OHS 33.3, Harris hip score for pain 36.7, Harris hip score for function 27.3). Of the 125 hips still available with at least 10 years of radiographic follow-up, 97 appeared stable and 28 were judged to be radiologically loose; however, there was no significant difference in the pain and function scores between the two groups. The overall complication rate was 11.5%, including 1% peri-operative death, 3.3% dislocation and 0.3% deep infection. Discussion. This is the largest series of medium- to long-term results of acetabular impaction bone grafting with a cemented cup for revision hip arthroplasty reported to date. The technique is particularly successful when used for Paprosky grade 1 and 2 deficiencies; grade 3 deficiencies may be better managed with a different method for reconstructing larger defects e.g. trabecular metal augments. Conclusion. This series shows good long-term results for impaction bone grafting of acetabular deficiencies in revision hip surgery, with survivorship of 86% for aseptic loosening at 13.5 years and satisfactory clinical outcomes

Impaction bone grafting with a cemented polished double-taper stem as a technique for revision of the femoral component was introduced in 1987 at our institution. As at January 2000, 540 cases in 487 patients had been performed. All procedures have been studied prospectively and there are no patients lost to follow-up. We present the survivorship and outcome data for these patients. Survivorship at 15 years is 90.6 percent [95 percent confidence interval: 88–93 percent]. Clinical scores show marked and sustained improvement. There have been 45 failures [8.3 percent]. Technical error contributed to 13 of the 24 non-infective complications, but with improved technique plus the addition of long stemmed impaction grafting, there have been no technical errors since 1996. Our results show that revision of the femoral component with impaction bone grafting is a reliable and durable technique with an acceptably low complication rate and with excellent survivorship at 15 years

Aim of the study: Impaction bone grafting is examined and published by numerous authors in the literature, however possible correlation between bone remodeling at the site of revision hip arthroplasty and bone turnover markers is not well known yet. Materials and method: 22 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting were enrolled in a prospective study. Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density (DXA) were measured preoperatively. WOMAC and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. During a one-year-period the same tests were performed after 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months respectively. The data were analyzed using logistic regression. Results: Significant bone remodeling was observed at the site of revision hip arthroplasty at the 6 month follow up. WOMAC and HHS improved significantly after surgery. One deep wound infection occurred due to MRSE, removal of the prosthesis was performed. Conclusion: Cancellous bone grafting secures primary stability for the hip implants, and after a period of 12 months proper bone remodeling is achieved

Background. Impaction bone grafting with milled human allograft is the gold standard for replacing lost bone stock during revision hip surgery. Problems surrounding the use of allograft include cost, availability, disease transmission and stem subsidence (usually due to shear failure of the surrounding allograft). Aims. To investigate various polymers for use as substitute allograft. The ideal graft would be a composite with similar mechanical characteristics as allograft, and with the ability to form de novo bone. Methods. High and low molecular weight (MW) forms of three different polymers (polylactic acid (PLA), poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) and polycaprolactone (PCL)) were milled, impacted into discs, and then tested in a custom built shear testing rig, and compared to allograft. A second stage of the experiment involved the addition of skeletal stem cells (SSC) to each of the milled polymers, impaction, 8 days incubation, and then tests for cell viability and number, via fluorostaining and biochemical (WST-1, DNA) assays. Results. The shear strengths of both high/ low MW PLA, and high/low MW PLGA were significantly higher than those of milled allograft but high and low MW PCL was poor to impact, and had significantly lower shear strengths. Fluorostaining showed good cell survival on high MW PLA, high MW PCL and both high and low MW PLGA. These findings were confirmed on both DNA and WST-1 assays. Conclusions. High MW PLA as well as high and low MW PLGA performed well both in mechanical testing and cell compatibility studies. These three polymers are good contenders to produce a living composite for use as substitute human allograft in impaction bone grafting

Impaction bone grafting with milled human allograft is the gold standard for replacing lost bone stock during revision hip surgery. Problems surrounding the use of allograft include cost, availability, disease transmission and stem subsidence (usually due to shear failure of the surrounding allograft). The aim of this study was to investigate various polymers for use as substitute allograft. The ideal graft would be a composite with similar mechanical characteristics as allograft, and with the ability to form de novo bone. High and low molecular weight (MW) forms of three different polymers (polylactic acid (PLA), poly (lactic co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) and polycaprolactone (PCL)) were milled, impacted into discs, and then tested in a custom built shear testing rig, and compared to allograft. A second stage of the experiment involved the addition of skeletal stem cells (SSC) to each of the milled polymers, impaction, 8 days incubation, and then tests for cell viability and number, via fluorostaining and biochemical (WST-1) assays. The shear strengths of both high/ low MW PLA, and high/low MW PLGA were significantly higher than those of milled allograft (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.005 and P<0.005) but high and low MW PCL was poor to impact, and had significantly lower shear strengths (P<0.005, P<0.001). Fluorostaining showed good cell survival on high MW PLA, high MW PCL and high MW PLGA. These findings were confirmed with WST-1 assays. High MW PLA as well as high MW PLGA performed well both in mechanical testing and cell compatibility studies. These two polymers are good contenders to produce a living composite for use as substitute human allograft in impaction bone grafting, and are currently being optimised for this use via the investigation of different production techniques and in-vivo studies

Aims. Impaction bone grafting with milled human allograft is the gold standard for replacing lost bone stock during revision hip surgery. Problems surrounding the use of allograft include cost, availability, disease transmission and stem subsidence (usually due to shear failure of the surrounding allograft). The aim of this study was to investigate various polymers for use as substitute allograft. The ideal graft would be a composite with similar mechanical characteristics as allograft, and with the ability to form de novo bone. Methods. High and low molecular weight (MW) forms of three different polymers (polylactic acid (PLA), poly (lactic co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) and polycaprolactone (PCL)) were milled, impacted into discs, and then tested in a custom built shear testing rig, and compared to allograft. A second stage of the experiment involved the addition of skeletal stem cells (SSC) to each of the milled polymers, impaction, 8 days incubation, and then tests for cell viability and number, via fluorostaining and biochemical (WST-1) assays. Results. The shear strengths of both high/low MW PLA, and high/low MW PLGA were significantly higher than those of milled allograft (P< 0.001, P< 0.001, P< 0.005 and P< 0.005) but high and low MW PCL was poor to impact, and had significantly lower shear strengths (P< 0.005, P< 0.001). Fluorostaining showed good cell survival on high MW PLA, high MW PCL and high MW PLGA. These findings were confirmed with WST-1 assays. Conclusions. High MW PLA as well as high MW PLGA performed well both in mechanical testing and cell compatibility studies. These two polymers are good contenders to produce a living composite for use as substitute human allograft in impaction bone grafting, and are currently being optimised for this use via the investigation of different production techniques and in-vivo studies

Introduction: Impaction bone grafting (IBG) for revision hip surgery can be a difficult surgical skill with a fine line between construct failure from insufficient compaction and intraoperative fracture from high impaction forces. Following on from our experience in the femur, in this study we used an acetabular model to test the hypothesis that the use of vibration for IBG could reduce the peak stresses thus reducing the intraoperative fracture risk and also improve the reliability and reproducibility of the impaction technique. Methods: Revision hemi pelvis models were made (Pra-prosky Type 2a). A standard impaction technique was used for the control group, and the impactor tamps were coupled with a pneumatic hammer for the vibration group. The cavity was filled in 6 set steps with strain gauge readings taken throughout. The pelvis construct was then mechanically loaded. Graft compaction and micro motion post mechanical testing was assessed with micro CT. Results: Vibration impaction led to a significant reduction (p=0.03) in the peak stresses during the impaction process. There was also significantly less variability in peak stresses for the vibration group compared to standard, both in sequential impactions by the same surgeon and between different surgeons. One medial wall fracture occurred in the control group only, similar to fractures encountered in the clinical situation. There was no significant difference in the degree of graft compaction or in the subsidence of the cup. Discussion: We believe that this new technique of applying vibration to the IBG process can reduce the risk of intraoperative fracture whilst achieving good graft compaction and implant stability. This technique therefore has the potential to widen the ‘safety margins’ of IBG and reduce the learning curve allowing more widespread adoption of the technique for replacing lost bone stock

AIM. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a potentially debilitating disease of the hip in young adults. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) of morcellised fresh frozen allograft is used in a number of orthopaedic conditions. This study has examined the potential of skeletal stem cells (SSC) to augment the mechanical properties of impacted bone graft and we translate these findings into clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN. We have examined the effect of SSC density on augmentation of bone formation. An in vitro model was developed to replicate the surgical IBG process. Plain allograft was used as the control, and the SSC's seeded at a density of 5×103, 5×104 and 2×105 cells per cc of allograft for the experimental groups. All samples were cultured for 2 weeks and mechanically tested to determine shear strength using the Mohr Coulomb failure curve. The approach was translated to 3 patients with early avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The patient's bone marrow was concentrated in theatre using a centrifugation device and the concentrated fraction of SSC's were seeded onto milled allograft. The patient's necrotic bone was drilled, curetted and replaced with impacted allograft seeded with SSC's. Osteogenic potential of concentrated and unconcentrated marrow was simultaneously compared in vitro by colony forming unit assays. RESULTS. The mechanical properties of the impacted allograft was significantly improved as a function of increasing SSC density. The difference compared to the control plain allograft was highly significant at the 2×105 level (p=0.001). Autologous SCC's on impacted bone allograft was subsequently applied in 3 patient cases and up to two year follow up demonstrates no deleterious effect. Critically the analysis of concentrated marrow demonstrated a higher SSC count in vitro than plain marrow aspirate. DISCUSSION. We have demonstrated the potential of skeletal stem cells to augment the mechanical properties of impacted bone allograft in a laboratory model and subsequently translated these findings into a new technique for the treatment of AVN of the femoral head. Such an approach provides not only improved mechanical support to the overlying cartilage but critically improved biology for new bone formation. The early clinical results are encouraging and indicate potential use also in fracture non-unions and void filling of bone defects

Impaction bone grafting in conjunction with a cemented polished double-taper stem as a technique for revision of the femoral component was introduced in 1987 at our institution. As at January 2000, 540 cases in 487 patients had been performed by multiple surgeons. All procedures have been studied prospectively, and there are no patients lost to follow-up. We present the survivorship and outcome data for these patients. Survivorship at 15 years is 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval:88–93 percent). Four hundred and six hips in 365 patients remain under active follow up, with 122 patients (134 hips) deceased. Averaged clinical scores taken preoperatively, 2 years postoperatively and at latest follow up showed marked and sustained improvement: Charnley Pain 2.7, 5.5, 5.3; Charnley Function 2.1, 4.1, 3.6; Charnley Range of Motion 4.0, 5.4, 5.3; Harris Pain 19, 38, 36; Harris Function 18, 32, 28; and Oxford Hip Score 41, 22, 25. There have been 45 failures (8.3 percent) at an average 7.6 year follow up (range 2.6–15.3 years). Technical error contributed to 13 of the 24 non-infective complications, but with improved technique plus the addition of long stemmed impaction grafting, there have been no technical errors since 1996. Our results show that revision of the femoral component with impaction bone grafting is a reliable and durable technique with an acceptably low complication rate with excellent survivorship at 15 years

Introduction. Loss of bone stock is a technically challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty (RevisionTHA). Impaction bone grafting (IBG) is an attractive biological method of reconstruction. We performed acetabular revisions using IBG and cemented cup in patients with failed hip prosthesis and large defects. The purpose is to report the short term results of revision THA with using IBG. Patients & Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients/19 hips revised for aseptic loosening of a cemented or uncemented cup, three male/16 female, mean 65.5 ± 8.8 years old (43–75). Mean follow up time is 18 months. Classification of acetabular defects according to A.A.O.S classification were Type I; 5 hips, Type III; 13 hips and Type V; 1 hip. Before impacting the morselized bone allograft and cement, segmental acetabular defects were reconstructed with metallic meshes screwed to the bone bed. Morselized allograft bone chips (diameter 7ï¼ 10 mm) were impacted forcefully. All-polyethylene cups (Stryker, Crossfire) were cemented. Clinical examination was performed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Radiographic examination was performed using AP radiographs. We measured the inclination cup angle, the distance of superior migration, the presence of loosening of the implanted cup, 4 weeks postoperatively and at the last follow up. Loosening was defined as migration distance was more than 5 mm in any direction. Results. Clinical JOA score improved from 61.0±3.9 to 83.6±2.7 at the last follow up. Complication in this study included one sciatic nerve palsy and one dislocation. In the radiographical analysis, inclination angle changed 41.8 ±2.2° at 4 weeks postoperatively to 42.3±1.8° at the last follow up. The average superior migration was 1.65±0.62 mm (0–9.00), and one loosening case (9.0 mm) was founded. In the loosening case, preoperative radiograph showed the shell had penetrated into the acetabulum. The case had extensive bone defect (4 cm×4 cm) including the medial wall and anterior column. Summary. The short term result of revision THA with using IBG was reported and most cases showed excellent clinical and radiographic results. But one loosening case was founded. The limitation of IBG may be associated with the lacked bony support behind the graft

Introduction: Impaction bone grafting in conjunction with a cemented polished double-taper stem as a technique for revision of the femoral component was introduced in 1987 at our institution. Methods: As at January 2000, 540 cases in 487 patients had been performed by multiple surgeons. All procedures have been studied prospectively, and there are no patients lost to follow-up. We present the survivorship and outcome data for these patients. Results: Survivorship at 15 years is 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval: 88–93 percent). 406 hips in 365 patients remain under active follow up, with 122 patients (134 hips) deceased. Averaged clinical scores taken pre-operatively, 2 years post-operatively, and at latest follow-up show marked and sustained improvement: Charnley Pain 2.7, 5.5, 5.3; Charnley Function 2.1, 4.1, 3.6; Charnley Range of Motion 4.0, 5.4, 5.3; Harris Pain 19, 38, 36; Harris Function 18, 32, 28; and Oxford Hip Score 41, 22, 25. There have been 45 failures (8.3 percent) at an average 7.6 year follow up (range 2.6 – 15.3 years). Technical error contributed to 13 of the 24 non-infective complications, but with improved technique plus the addition of long stemmed impaction grafting, there have been no technical errors since 1996. Conclusion: Our results show that revision of the femoral component with impaction bone grafting is a reliable and durable technique with an acceptably low complication rate with excellent survivorship at 15 years

Impaction bone grafting (IBG) of the acetabulum in cemented primary total hip replacement is a useful technique in the management of acetabular deficiencies. It has the capacity to restore anatomy and bone stock with good long-term outcome. We present 125 consecutive cases of IBG with a cemented polyethylene component. All patients who received full IBG of the acetabulum in primary cemented Exeter total hip replacements and who underwent surgery between August 1995 and August 2003 were identified. All operative and follow-up data was collected prospectively and no patients were lost to follow-up. All patients underwent pre-operative and regular post-operative hip scores with the Harris, Oxford and the modified Charnley scoring systems. Data on indication, surgical technique, socket position and migration and revision was reviewed at a mean follow-up of 7.6 (range 5 to13.4) years. Between August 1995 and August 2003, 113 patients (85 females) with an average age of 67.8 (range 22.9–99.2) years underwent 125 primary Exeter cemented total hip replacements with IBG of acetabular defects. Acetabular defects were classified according to the AAOS classification as cavitatory in 62 hips and as segmental, requiring application of a rim mesh prior to IBG, in 63 hips. Life tables were constructed demonstrating 86.4% survival of the acetabular component at 13.4 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint and 89.3% survival with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint. Of the seven patients who underwent revision for aseptic loosening, all had pre-operative segmental acetabular defects requiring application of a rim mesh. No patient who underwent IBG for a cavitatory defect required revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Survival of the Exeter cemented femoral component was 100% at 13.4 years with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint. There were 11 radiographic failures of the acetabular component, which have not been revised at latest review. One of these is symptomatic but not fit for revision surgery, two were asymptomatic at time of death and eight are asymptomatic but under review. This is the largest series of IBG in the acetabulum in cemented primary THR. Our results suggest that the medium term survival of this technique is good, particularly when used for cavitatory defects. Although there were radiographic failures, these are largely asymptomatic and may not require revision

Femoral Impaction allografting is now an established method in revision hip arthroplasty where there is a deficiency in bone stock. Most experience of this technique has been in conjunction with a cemented collarless, polished, tapered (CPT) stem. We conducted a retrospective study into the clinical and radiological results of 67 consecutive patients with an average of 62 months (36–108 months) follow-up. In all cases, Impaction bone grafting was performed using a transtrochanteric approach and cemented Charnley and Elite Plus stems. In our series no femoral component has been revised. The overall subsidence was 2.2 mm. 57 hips (85%) showed subsidence of 4 mm or less. However two patients showed massive subsidence of greater than 10mm, both with associated osteolysis and radiolucent lines. In addition, one stem showed a progressive varus position and debonding of the cement-metal interface. Analysis of the bone allograft showed evidence of incorporation in 56 (84%) of patients. The Merle D’Aubigne-Postal clinical score increased from an average of 8.3 pre-operatively to 15.3 at the last review. 60 patients (89.5%) complained of no or slight pain. There was a 10% re-operation rate due to complications. Three patients sustained periprosthetic fractures around the tip of the prosthesis, all successfully treated with a plate. Three patients suffered recurrent dislocation, two needed revision of the acetabula component. Two patients needed trochanteric wires removed for persistent pain. Direct comparison of different prostheses is difficult due to many confounding variables. However the medium term results of our study are comparable to the results reported using the Exeter and CPT stems