Several surgical options have been utilised to treat patients with back dominant lumbar disc disease. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent lumbar fusion with an expandable
A biomechanical study assessing compressive failure load, strength and stiffness with three different
Aim. To assess the safety of Zero Profile Interbody fusion (Zero P) device in Anterior Cervical Decompression and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical stenosis. Method. 89 consecutive patients treated with Zero P
Aims: In this study, the subsidence of different
Purpose: At present there is no reported, valid and reproducible model of degenerative spondylolisthesis for biomechanical testing of spinal implants. The purpose of this study was to create a single functional spinal unit (FSU) model that could demonstrate anterolisthesis consistent with low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis under physiologic shear loads. Method: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric, lumbar FSU’s were potted and secured in a custom jig for pure shear testing. The cranial segment was loaded from – 50N (posterior) to 250N (anterior) over three cycles for each of five test conditions with a 300N preload. Test conditions addressed known restraints to shear translation and were performed in the same order for all specimens, and included: intact, facet capsulectomy and bilateral two mm facet gap, bilateral four mm facet gap, nucleotomy, and annular release. Three-dimensional motion was recorded using an optoelectronic camera system. Results: Mean anterior translation at 250N for the five test conditions was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval 0.4 to 0.9), 1.2 mm (0.9 to 1.6), 1.5 mm (1.1 to 2.0), 1.9 mm (1.4 to 2.4) and 3.1 mm (2.2 to 4.0). The mean maximum anterior translation was significantly different for each test condition with two exceptions. The four mm facet gap did not result in a significantly different maximum anterior translation compared to the two mm facet gap or the nucleotomy. There were no differences in off-axis motion (lateral or superior-inferior translation, flexion-extension, axial rotation, lateral bending) between the five test conditions. Conclusion: Anterior translation consistent with low grade degenerative spondylolisthesis was repeatedly demonstrated under physiologic shear loads using this model. All sequential destabilizations preserved anatomy critical for the application of pedicle screw constructs,
Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted. As part of the SpInOuT-F study, a pilot randomized trial was carried out across five NHS hospitals. Patients were randomized to either spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline and three months. The intended sample size was 60 patients.Aims
Methods
Summary. Between January 2003 and October 2004,12 patients with non tuberculous spondylodiscitis were treated by radical debridment, reconstruction and stabilization. In our group 9 patients underwent posterior procedure and 3 underwent combined anterior and posterior procedures. 3 of these had fungal and 9 pyogenic infections. All the patients had appropriate antimicrobial therapy All patients had excellent to good functional results and no evidence of infection at 2 year follow-up. Introduction. Surgical treatment of nontuberculous spon-dylodiscitis of lumbar spine is challenging due to extensive bone involvement and comorbid conditions. This study is to assess the role of radical debridment followed by reconstruction and stabilization of affected segments in reducing morbidity and mortality in these patients. Methods. 12 consecutive patients were operated between January 2003 and October 2004. Patients presented with severe back pain, root compression or paraparesis.7 cases had prior spinal surgery. Blood and radiological investigations were diagnostic. All these patients underwent radical debridement, reconstruction and stabilization of affected segments done with titanium pedicular screws, titanium mesh cages, cancellous iliac crest graft. Only posterior procedure in 9 cases, combined anterior posterior in 3 cases followed by adequate and appropriate antimicrobials therapy. Follow-up ranged from 25 to 35 months. Results: 3 cases were fungal and 9 were pyogenic infection. Oswestry low back questionnaire, kirkaldy-willis criteria showed dramatic improvement of function. All the blood parameters were normalized in 3 months.1 case had dural tear which was repaired immediately,3 cases had wound exploration and lavage. No major complications were encountered. All cases showed Radiological fusion at last follow-up. Discussion: Radical debridement of necrotic material, decompression of neurological structures, create a good vascularised environment. Restoring stability compromised by either infection or prior surgery helps in healing process and reduces morbidity of patients. Significance: Reconstruction using pedicular system and
Interbody fusion aims to treat painful disc disease by demobilising the spinal segment through the use of an
High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a disabling disorder for which many different operative techniques have been described. The aim of this study is to evaluate Scoliosis Research Society 22-item (SRS-22r) scores, global balance, and regional spino-pelvic alignment from two to 25 years after surgery for high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis using an all-posterior partial reduction, transfixation technique. SRS-22r and full-spine lateral radiographs were collected for the 28 young patients (age 13.4 years (SD 2.6) who underwent surgery for high-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis in our centre (Scottish National Spinal Deformity Service) between 1995 and 2018. The mean follow-up was nine years (2 to 25), and one patient was lost to follow-up. The standard surgical technique was an all-posterior, partial reduction, and S1 to L5 transfixation screw technique without direct decompression. Parameters for segmental (slip percentage, Dubousset’s lumbosacral angle) and regional alignment (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, L5 incidence, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis) and global balance (T1 spino-pelvic inclination) were measured. SRS-22r scores were compared between patients with a balanced and unbalanced pelvis at final follow-up.Aims
Methods
Background. Synthetic
Introduction Anterior column reconstruction and fusion remains the gold standard of treatment for a number of spinal pathologies. One of the challenges of interbody fusions cages is the footprint of the cage reducing the surface area of endplate available for fusion. Biodegradable polymer implants will over time present a greater area for fusion and may help to reduce problems such as stress shielding, particulate debris and retained foreign body response. Resorbable cages have been have been prepared from a number of different materials, including inorganic composites (eg hydroxyapatite / tricalcium phosphate) and polymers (Poly L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide (PDLLA)). However all of the current options for interbody fusion have reported deficiencies or complications. The synthesis, mechanical properties, and degradation behaviour of two novel biopolymers are presented and the applicability for use as materials in
We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) compared with bone graft when used specifically for revision spinal fusion surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched using defined search terms. The primary outcome measure was spinal fusion, assessed as success or failure in accordance with radiograph, MRI or CT scan review at 24-month follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was time to fusion.Objectives
Methods