One of the key factors responsible for altered kinematics and joint stability following contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is resection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Therefore, retaining the ACL is often considered to be the “holy grail” of TKA. However, ACL retention can present several technical challenges, and in some cases may not be viable due to an absent or non-functional ACL. Therefore, the goal of this research was to investigate whether substitution of ACL function through an anterior post mechanism could improve kinematic deficits of contemporary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining (CR) implants. This was done using KneeSIM, a previously established dynamic simulation tool based on an Oxford-rig setup. Deep knee bend, chair-sit, stair-ascent and walking were simulated for a contemporary ACL sacrificing (CR) implant, two ACL retaining implants, and an ACL substituting and PCL retaining implant. The motion of the femoral condyles relative to the tibia was recorded for kinematic comparisons.

Our results revealed that, like ACL retaining implants, the ACL substituting implant could also provide kinematic improvements over contemporary ACL sacrificing implants by reducing early posterior femoral shift and preventing paradoxical anterior sliding. Such ACL substituting implants may be a valuable addition to the armament of joint surgeons, allowing them to provide improved knee function even when ACL retention is not feasible. Further research is required to investigate this mechanism in vitro and in vivo to verify the results of the simulations, and to determine whether kinematic improvements translate into improved clinical outcomes.

It is widely accepted that navigation system for TKA improves precision in component alignment. Furthermore, some of the system can measure knee kinematics during surgery. On the other hand, the measurements of kinematics during surgery have limitations because of anesthesia and usage of air tourniquet. The purpose of the present study is to compare the knee kinematics during surgery using navigation system and that after surgery using 2D/3D Registration Technique. Our final goal of the study is to improve clinical outcome by performing feedback of good clinical results to operating theater by means of kinematic analysis. Kinematics of ten TKA knees for female (average age 71 years old) medial compartmental osteoarthritic knees concerning axial rotation and anterior-posterior translation were measured twice, the time during surgery and 4 weeks after surgery. During surgery, measurement was performed using CT based navigation system (Vector Vision 1.6, Brain LAB, Heimstetten, Germany). Four weeks after surgery, knee kinematics was measured again using a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design models to reproduce the position of metallic implants from single-view fluoroscopic images. Surgery was performed by single surgeon using subvastus approach to eliminate the influence of approach to muscle balance. Implant using the present study was P.F.C. Sigma RP-F (DePuy, Warsaw, USA). Axial rotation in navigation and 2D/3D are 12.3+/−2.3, and 12.6+/−3.8, respectively. Axial rotations in both of the measurement have the same pattern. A-P translations also have the same pattern between measurement in navigation and that in 2D/3D technique. These results suggested that intraoperative kinematic measurement links to postoperative kinematics. Studies of correlations between kinematics and good clinical results are ongoing

We aim to determine the differences in lower limb joint kinematics during the golf swing of patients who had undergone Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and a control group of native knee golfers.

A case-control study was undertaken with ten golfers who had undergone TKA (cruciate retaining single radius implant) and five age and matched golfers with native knees. Each golfer performed five swings with a driver whilst being recorded at 200Hz by a ten-camera motion capture system. Knee and hip three-dimensional joint angles (JA) and joint angular velocities (JAV) were calculated and statistically compared between the groups at six swing events.

The only significant differences in knee joint kinematics between TKA and control groups was a lower external rotation JA in the left knee during the backswing (p=0.010). There was no significant difference in knee JAV between the groups. Both hips demonstrated significantly (p=0.023 for left and p=0.037 for right) lower flexion in the TKA group during the takeaway swing event, and there was lower internal rotation in the backswing and greater external rotation in the downswing of the right hip. There was also slower left hip extension JAV in the downswing.

Normal knee kinematics were observed during the golf swing following TKA, with the exception of reduced external rotation in the left knee during the back swing and the right during the down swing. The differences demonstrated in the hip motion indicate that they may make compensatory movements to adjust to the reduced external rotation demonstrated in the knee.

Introduction. A total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the standard of care treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Over the last decade, we have observed a change in TKA patient population to include younger patients. This cohort tends to be more active and thus places more stress on the implanted prothesis. Bone cement has historically been used to establish fixation between the implant and host bone, resulting in two interfaces where loosening may occur. Uncemented fixation methods provide a promising alternative to cemented fixation. While vulnerable during the early post-operative period, cementless implants may be better suited to long-term stability in younger patient cohorts. It is currently unknown whether the surgical technique used to implant the cementless prostheses impacts the longevity of the implant. Two different surgical techniques are commonly used by surgeons and may result in different load distribution across the joint, which will affect bone ingrowth. The overall objective of the study is to assess implant migration and in vivo kinematics following cementless TKA. Methods. Thirty-nine patients undergoing a primary unilateral TKA as a result of OA were recruited prior to surgery and randomized to a surgical technique based on surgeon referral. In the gap balancing surgical technique (GB) soft tissues releases are made to restore neutral limb alignment followed by bone cuts (resection) to balance the joint space in flexion and extension. In the measured resection surgical technique (MR) bone cuts are first made based on anatomical landmarks and soft tissue releases are subsequently conducted with implant components in-situ. Patients returned 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks following surgery for radiographic evaluation. Kinematics were assessed 52 weeks post-operatively. Results. No significant difference was observed between groups in maximum total point motion (MTPM) at any time point during the first post-operative year. MTPM of both the tibial and femoral component did not significantly change between the six month and one year follow up visits for both the GB (6 mths=0.67 ±0.34mm, 1 yr=0.65 ±0.52, p=0.71) and MR (6 mths= 0.79 ±0.53mm, 1 yr= 0.82 ±0.43mm, p=0.56) cohorts. MTPM for both components over the follow up period is displayed in Figure 1. No significant difference was observed in contact location or pattern on the medial condyle during deep flexion (Figure 2A). A significant difference (p=0.01) was observed, however, between surgical techniques in the lateral contact location at full extension (Figure 2B). No significant difference was observed in the magnitude of AP excursion for both the medial and lateral condyles within and between groups. Conclusion. Surgical technique did not impact the MTPM of an uncemented TKA design during the first post-operative year. By the six month post-operative period tibial and femoral MTPM plateaus indicating that osseointegration between the host bone and implanted components has occurred. Kinematic evaluation indicates contact locations anterior to the midline of the sagittal plane, paradoxical anterior translation, and a lateral pivot point, regardless of surgical technique

Introduction. Kinematics post-TKA are complex; component alignment, component geometry and the patient specific musculoskeletal environment contribute towards the kinematic and kinetic outcomes of TKA. Tibial rotation in particular is largely uncontrolled during TKA and affects both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. Given the complex nature of post- TKA kinematics, this study sought to characterize the contribution of tibial tray rotation to kinematic outcome variability across three separate knee geometries in a simulated framework. Method. Five 50. th. percentile knees were selected from a database of planned TKAs produced as part of a pre-operative dynamic planning system. Virtual surgery was performed using Stryker (Kalamazoo, MI) Triathlon CR and PS and MatOrtho (Leatherhead, UK) SAIPH knee medially stabilised (MS) components. All components were initially planned in mechanical alignment, with the femoral component neutral to the surgical TEA. Each knee was simulated through a deep knee bend, and the kinematics extracted. The tibial tray rotational alignment was then rotated internally and externally by 5° & 10°. The computational model simulates a patient specific deep knee bend and has been validated against a cadaveric Oxford Knee Rig. Preoperative CT imaging was obtained, landmarking to identify all patient specific axes and ligament attachment sites was performed by pairs of trained biomedical engineers. Ethics for this study is covered by Bellberry Human Research Ethics Committee application number 2012-03-710. Results and Discussion. From the 360 Knee Systems database, 1847 knees were analysed, giving an average coronal alignment of 4.25°±5.66° varus. Five knees were selected with alignments between 4.1° and 4.3° varus. Kinematic outcomes were averaged over the 5 knees. The component geometries resulted in characteristically distinct kinematics, in which femoral rollback was most constrained by the PS components, whereas tibiofemoral axial rotation was most constrained in MS components. Patella lateral shift was comparable amongst all components in extension, medialising in flexion. Patella shift remained more lateral in MS components compared to PS and CR. Average patella lateral shift, medial and lateral facet rollback separated by tibial tray rotation are shown for all component systems in Figure 1. Medial and lateral facet rollback in the PS and CR components are symmetrical and opposite, indicating that with tibial tray rotation, the tibiofemoral articulation point balances between component rotation and neutral alignment, reflecting the restoring force exerted by the simulated collateral ligaments. As such, with higher internal tibial rotation and subsequent lateralisation of the tubercle, patella lateral shift increases. MS medial and lateral facet rollback however are not symmetrical nor opposite, reflecting the chirality of the tibiofemoral articulation. With internal tibial tray rotation, relatively high lateral facet rollback is observed, lateralising the femoral component centre, giving the patella component a relatively more medial position. Conclusions. Component geometry was found here to produce characteristically distinct tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. Medial stabilised components reported asymmetric kinematic changes, compared to either CR or PS components, in which a higher rate of change was observed for internal tray rotation, indicating that neutral or external rotation of medial stabilised components will result in more predictable kinematic outcomes

Objectives. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is one surgical option for treating symptomatic medial osteoarthritis. Clinical studies have shown the functional benefits of UKA; however, the optimal alignment of the tibial component is still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of tibial coronal and sagittal plane alignment in UKA on knee kinematics and cruciate ligament tension, using a musculoskeletal computer simulation. Methods. The tibial component was first aligned perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia, with a 7° posterior slope (basic model). Subsequently, coronal and sagittal plane alignments were changed in a simulation programme. Kinematics and cruciate ligament tensions were simulated during weight-bearing deep knee bend and gait motions. Translation was defined as the distance between the most medial and the most lateral femoral positions throughout the cycle. Results. The femur was positioned more medially relative to the tibia, with increasing varus alignment of the tibial component. Medial/lateral (ML) translation was smallest in the 2° varus model. A greater posterior slope posteriorized the medial condyle and increased anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tension. ML translation was increased in the > 7° posterior slope model and the 0° model. Conclusion. The current study suggests that the preferred tibial component alignment is between neutral and 2° varus in the coronal plane, and between 3° and 7° posterior slope in the sagittal plane. Varus > 4° or valgus alignment and excessive posterior slope caused excessive ML translation, which could be related to feelings of instability and could potentially have negative effects on clinical outcomes and implant durability. Cite this article: K. Sekiguchi, S. Nakamura, S. Kuriyama, K. Nishitani, H. Ito, Y. Tanaka, M. Watanabe, S. Matsuda. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:126–135. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJR-2018-0208.R2

Aims: Kinematics of the arthritic knee joint is to date not very well understood, yet this is a significant parameter affecting the results of knee arthroplasties; we studied the axial rotation of the tibia during knee flexion in osteoarthritic knees in order to understand better the kinematics of the arthritic joint. Methods: Tibial rotation and the screw home mechanism were studied in 55 consecutive patients (31 females and 24 males) with diagnosed knee OA. The assessment was performed by consultant orthopaedic surgeons using the trackers and the software of a navigation system, prior to any soft tissue release. The Student t-test was used for the statistical analysis. Results: We identified 3 different patterns of tibial rotation during knee flexion. 26 knees had normal tibial rotation pattern with the tibia rotating internally during knee flexion (mean rotation: 15.5°). In 22 knees (40%) the tibia was rotating internally and then externally as the flexion was progressing (mean rotation: 6.7°). In 7 joints (13%) a reverse tibial rotation was recorded, the tibia was rotating externally in all flexion increments (mean rotation: 2.2°). We also recorded that most of the tibial rotation occurs in the first 0–30° of flexion (70%) p< 0.001. Conclusion: The screw home mechanism and the normal tibial rotation upon knee flexion were absent or distorted in the majority of osteoarthritic knees. We found three distinctive patterns of the tibial rotation (normal, erratic and reversed) during knee flexion

Introduction. While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves postoperative function and relieves pain in the majority of patients with end stage osteoarthritis, its ability to restore normal knee kinematics is debated. Cadaveric studies using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) system [1] are one of the most commonly used methods in the assessment of post-TKA knee kinematics. Commonly, these studies are performed with an open arthrotomy; which may impact the knee kinematics. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to compare the knee kinematics before and after (open or closed) arthrotomy. Materials and Methods. Kinematics of seven non-arthritic, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (PCL presumably intact) was evaluated using a custom software application in an image-free CAOS system (ExactechGPS, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR). Prior to the surgical incision, one tracker was attached to the diaphysis of each tibia and femur. Native intact knee kinematics was then assessed by performing passive range of motion (ROM) three separate times, from full extension to at least 110 degrees of flexion, with the CAOS system measuring and recording anatomical values, including flexion angle, internal-external (IE) rotation and anterior-posterior (AP) translation of the tibia relatively to the femur, and the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Next, an anterior incision with a medial parapatellar arthrotomy was performed, followed by acquisition of the anatomical landmarks used for establishing an anatomical coordinate system in which all the anatomical values were evaluated [2]. The passive ROM test was then repeated with closed and then open arthrotomy (patella manually maintained in the trochlea groove). The anatomical values before and after knee arthrotomy were compared over the range of knee flexion using the native knee values as the baseline. Results. Generally, kinematics from the native knee were found to be similar to those with closed and open arthrotomy. Deviations between native knee and arthrotomy groups (open or closed, whichever was the worst case) were 0.49±0.52mm for the AP translation, 0.44±0.41° for the HKA, and 0.86±0.8° for the IE rotation (Figures 1–3). The deviation from native knee kinematics was found to be higher with increased flexion angles in both HKA and AP translation. Closing the arthrotomy had minimal effect on knee kinematics, and no difference was seen in knee kinematics between an open and closed arthrotomy, so long as the patella is manually maintained within the trochlear groove. Discussion. This study demonstrated arthrotomy, whether open or closed, did not affect the tested knee kinematics compared to a native intact knee. The deviation found in the anatomical values was within the typical range of clinical variation. Increased deviation in high flexion for some anatomical values may be due to difficulty in reproducing consistent motion during ROM test. This study showed that an open arthrotomy with the patella maintained in the trochlea groove provides accurate assessment of the intact knee kinematics

Introduction. The effectiveness of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Multiple studies have been published that reveal conflicting results on the effectiveness of PSI, but no study has analyzed the contact kinematics within knee joints replaced with the use of PSI. Since a departure from normal kinematics can lead to eccentric loading, premature wear, and component loosening, studying the kinematics in patients who have undergone TKA with PSI can provide valuable insight on the ability of PSI to improve functionality and increase longevity. The goal of the present study was to compare femoral and tibial component migration (predictive of long-term loosening and revision) and contact kinematics following TKA using conventional instruments (CI) and PSI based surgical techniques. Methods. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 50 patients, with 25 patients each in the PSI and CI groups, powered for radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients in the PSI group received an MRI and standing 3-foot x-rays to construct patient-specific cut-through surgical guides for the femur and tibia with a mechanical limb alignment. All patients received the same posterior-stabilized implant with marker beads inserted in the bone around the implants to enable RSA imaging. Patients underwent supine RSA exams at multiple time points (two and six weeks, three and six months, and one and two years). At 2 years post-op, a series of RSA radiographs were acquired at different knee flexion angles, ranging in 20° increments from 0° to 120°, to measure the tibiofemoral contact kinematics. Migrations of the femoral and tibial components were calculated using model-based RSA software. Kinematics were measured for each condyle for magnitude of excursion, contact location, and stability. Results. There were no differences (p > 0.05) between the PSI and CI groups for demographics or pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome scores. Three patients in the PSI group and seven patients in the CI group (p = 0.28) had a post-operative limb alignment outside of the neutral target (>3° varus or valgus). There was no difference in the change of tibial slope from pre- to post-operation between groups (p = 0.49). There were no differences (p > 0.05) in translations or rotations in any individual plane across all time points for either the tibial or femoral components. Maximum total point motion (MTPM) at 6 months for the tibial component was 0.54 ± 0.25 mm in the CI group and 0.51 ± 0.22 mm in the PSI group (p = 0.77), placing both groups at the low end of the “at risk” category for predicted loosening. Change in MTPM from 6 months to 1 year and again from 1 year to 2 years was <0.2 mm, indicating both groups of implants had stable fixation. Femoral component MTPM was also not different (p > 0.05) between groups. There was no significant difference between PSI and CI groups with respect to magnitude of excursion on both medial (p = 0.54) and lateral (p = 0.81) condyles. There was also no difference in contact locations on both the medial and lateral condyles (p = 0.28 to 0.91) for all angles of flexion. There was no significant difference present between PSI and CI groups when comparing the stability for both the medial (p = 0.06) and lateral (= 0.85) condyles. Condylar separation was present in 3/20 CI patients and 0/16 PSI patients (p = 0.24). Conclusion. Using the latest RSA criteria for predicting failure from early migration, the use of PSI does not provide an advantage over CI for preventing aseptic loosening. Moreover, PSI did not provide any substantial advantage over CI for TKA surgery with respect to contact kinematics

Introduction and aims. Recently many implants for ankle arthroplasty have been developed around the world, and especially some mobile bearing, three-component implants have good results. Nevertheless, at our institution fixed two-component, semi-constrained alumina ceramic total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with TNK Ankle had been performed since 1991 and led to improved outcomes. We report clinical results and in vivo kinematic analyses for TNK Ankle. Method. Between 1991 and 2006, total ankle arthroplasties with TNK Ankle were performed with 102 patients (106 ankles) with osteoarthritis at our institution. There were 91 women and 11 men. The mean age was 69 years and mean follow-up was 5.4 years. These cases were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Besides in vivo kinematics, in TNK Ankle was analysed using 3D-2D model registration technique with fluoroscopic images. Between 2007 and 2008, prospectively ten TAA cases examined with fluoroscopy at postoperative one year. Results. In clinical results, excellent were 48 cases, good were 31 cases, fair were 10 cases, poor were nine cases, and death and loss to follow-up were 10 cases. Reoperations are performed on eight cases, one was arthrodesis, seven were talar component revision or talar revision with ceramic whole talus prosthesis. TNK Ankle have the rough surfaces by beadworks, and added surface treatment with hydroxyapatite granules, calcium phosphate paste or tissue engineered mesenchymal cells. Recently, only talar components were fixed with bone cement. Loosening has been more frequent in talar than tibial, whereas no reoperation was on cemented talar component cases. According to 3D-2D model registration, both components rotated a little each other and the contact region between both components variously sifted during weight bearing flexion of ankle. It was supposed that replaced position and angle of components concerned with the contact region. Conclusions. TAA with TNK Ankle have led to better results with improvement for surface treatments. Kinematics of ankle prostheses was derived by 3D-2D model registration, more appropriate position and angle to replace

Intra-articular cartilage pressure distribution in the knee joint is critical in the understanding of osteoarthritis. Combining personalized statistical modeling of the morphological characteristics with discrete element modeling enables patient-specific predictions of the pressure on the tibial plateau. However, modeling of the meniscus during gait is complicated by the dynamic nature of the structure. Nevertheless, the position of the meniscus has a substantial impact on intra-articular stress distribution. Therefore, the focus of this presentation will be on how modeling of meniscal movement during knee flexion improves insight in general meniscal kinematics for the use in tibiofemoral stress distribution calculations.

Introduction

We have previously reported that patients who demonstrated medial pivot kinematics pattern after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had better clinical results than that of non-medial pivot pattern. However, it is unclear how preoperative kinematics pattern affects postoperative knee kinematics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative and postoperative knee kinematics pattern in TKA.

There is great contemporary interest to provide treatments for knees with medial or medial plus patellofemoral arthritis that allow retention of the cruciate ligaments and the natural lateral compartment. Options for bicompartmental arthroplasty include custom implants, discrete compartmental implants and monoblock off-the-shelf implants. Each approach has potential benefits. The monoblock approach has the potential to provide a cost-efficient off-the-shelf solution with relatively simple surgical instrumentation and procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine if monoblock bicompartmental knee arthroplasty shows evidence of retained cruciate ligament function and clinical performance more similar to unicompartmental arthroplasty than total knee arthroplasty. Nine females and one male patient were enrolled in this IRB approved study. Each subject received unilateral bicompartmental knee arthroplasty an average of 2.6 years (2.0 to 3.6 years) prior to this study. Subjects averaged 65 years (58–72 years) and 28 BMI (25–31) at the time of surgery. Mean outcome scores at the time of study were 97/95 for the Knee Society knee/function score, 16.4 Oxford score, 6.5 UCLA Activity score and 137 degrees range of motion. Subjects were observed using dynamic fluoroscopy during lunge, kneeling and step-up/down activities. Subjects also received CT scans of the knee in order to create bone/implant composite shape models. Model-image registration techniques were used to determine 3D knee kinematics (Figure 1). Knee angles were quantified using a flexion-abduction-rotation Cardan sequence and condylar translations were determined from the lowest point on the condyle with respect to the transverse plane of the tibial segment. Maximum knee flexion during lunge and kneeling activities averaged 112°±8° and 125°±7°, respectively. Tibial internal rotation averaged 10°±6° and 12°±10° for the lunge and kneeling activities. For both deeply flexed postures, the medial condyle was 1 mm anterior to the AP center of the tibia while the lateral condyle was 11 mm and 13 mm posterior to the tibial center. For the step-up/down activity, tibial internal rotation increased an average of 2° from 5° to 75° flexion, but was quite variable (Figure 2). Medial condylar translations averaged 4 mm posterior from 5° to 25° flexion, followed by 6 mm anterior translation from 25° to 80° flexion (Figure 3). All knees showed posterior condylar translation from extension to early flexion. An important potential benefit to any bicompartmental arthroplasty treatments is retention of the cruciate ligaments and maintenance of more natural knee function. The knees in this study showed excellent or good clinical outcomes and functional scores, and relatively activity high levels. There was no evidence of so-called paradoxical anterior femoral translation during early flexion, indicating retained integrity of the natural AP stabilizing structures. Weight-bearing deep flexion during lunge and kneeling activities was comparable to previously reported unicompartmental and well-performing total knee arthroplasty subjects. Kinematics were quite variable between subjects. Monoblock bicompartmental arthroplasty appears to permit functional retention of the cruciate ligaments, consistent with functionally stable knees. Further efforts should focus on the specific surgical placement of off-the-shelf bicompartmental implants to optimize knee function and provide consistent knee mechanics

PURPOSE. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful technique for treating painful osteoarthritic knees. However, the patients' satisfaction is not still comparable with total hip arthroplasty. Basically, the conditions with operated joints were anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knees, thus, the abnormal kinematics is one of the main reason for the patients' incomplete satisfaction. Bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA was established to reproduce both ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and expected to improve the abnormal kinematics. However, there were few reports to evaluate intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA using navigation system. Hence, the aim in this study is to reveal the intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA and compare the kinematics with conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA. Materials and Methods. Twenty five consecutive subjects (24 women, 1 men; average age, 77 years; age range, 58–85 years) with varus osteoarthritis undergoing navigated BCS TKA (Journey II, Smith&Nephew) were enrolled in this study. An image-free navigation system (Stryker 4.0 image-free computer navigation system; Stryker) was used for the operation. Registration was performed after minimum medial soft tissue release, ACL and PCL resection, and osteophyte removal. Then, kinematics including tibiofemoral rotational angles from maximum extension to maximum flexion were recorded. The measurements were performed again after implantation. We compared the kinematics with the kinematics of paired matched fifty subjects who underwent conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (25 subjects with Triathlon, Stryker; 25 subjects with PERSONA, ZimmerBiomet) using navigation statistically. Results. Preoperative tibiofemoral rotational kinematics were almost the same between the three implants groups. Kinematics at post-implantation found that tibia was significantly internally rotated compared to the kinematics at registration in all three implants at maximum extension position (p<0.05), however the tibial rotational position with BCS TKA was significantly externally rotated at maximum extension position, compared to the other two implant position (p<0.05). The tibial rotational position with Triathlon PS TKA was externally rotated at 60 degrees of flexion compared to the other two implant position, however the results were not statistically significant. Discussion and Conclusion. Previous study found that PCL resection changed tibial rotational position and the amount of tibial internal rotation, affecting postoperative maximum flexion angles. This study found that BCS TKA can reduce the amount of rotational changes, compared to conventional PS TKA. Further studies are needed to investigate the kinematic changes in BCS TKA affect the postoperative clinical outcomes

A comparative kinematic study was carried out on six cadaver limbs, comparing tibiofemoral kinematics in five different conditions: unloaded, under a constant 130 N ankle load with a variable quadriceps load, with and without a constant 50 N medial and lateral hamstrings load. Kinematics were described as translation of the projected centers of the medial (MFT) and lateral femoral condyles (LFT) in the horizontal plane of the tibia, and tibial axial rotation (TR) as a function of flexion angle. In passive conditions, the tibia rotated internally with increasing flexion, to an average of −16° (range −12/−20°, SD 3.0°). Between 0 – 40° flexion, the medial condyle translated forwards 4 mm (range 0.8/5.5 mm, SD 2.5 mm), followed by a gradual posterior translation, totaling −9 mm (range −5.8/−18.5 mm, SD 4.9 mm) between 40° – 140° flexion. The lateral femoral condyle translated posteriorly with increasing flexion completing −25 mm (range −22.6 – −28.2 mm, SD 2.5 mm). Dynamic, loaded measurements were carried out in a knee rig. Under a fixed ankle load of 130 N and variable quadriceps loading, tibial rotation was inverted, mean TR 4.7° (range −3.3°/11.8° SD 5.4°), MFT −0.5 mm (range = −4.3/2.4 mm, SD = 2.4 mm), LFT 3.3 mm (range = −3.6/10.6 mm, SD = 5.1 mm). As compared to the passive condition, all these excursions were significantly different: p=0.015, p=0.013, and p=0.011 for TR, MFT and LFT respectively. Adding medial and lateral hamstrings force of 50N each, reduced TR, MFT and LFT significantly as compared to the passive condition. In general, loading the knee with hamstrings and quadriceps reduces rotation and translation as compared to the passive condition. Lateral hamstring action is more influential on knee kinematics than medial hamstrings action

Introduction. Many fluoroscopic studies on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have identified kinematic variabilities compared to the normal knee, with many subjects experiencing paradoxical motion patterns. The intent of this study was to investigate the results of a newly designed PCR TKA to determine kinematic variabilities and assess these kinematic patterns with those previously documented for the normal knee. Methods. The study involves determining the in vivo kinematics for 80 subjects compared to the normal knee. 10 subjects have a normal knee, 40 have a Journey II PCR TKA and 40 subjects with the Journey II XR TKA (BCR). Although all PCR subjects have been evaluated, we are continuing to evaluate subjects with a BCR TKA. All TKAs were performed by a single surgeon and deemed clinically successful. All subjects performed a deep knee bend from full extension to maximum flexion while under fluoroscopic surveillance. Kinematics were calculated via 3D-to-2D registration at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion. Anterior/posterior translation of the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyles and femorotibial axial rotation were compared during ranges of motion in relation to the function of the cruciate ligaments. Results. Of the 40 PCR TKAs, the average overall flexion was 112.6°, while the average for normal subjects was 139.0°. Initial BCR subjects revealed a higher than expected 128.0°. From 0=30° knee flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated −4.74±4.94 mm of posterior LAP movement, −2.04±4.07 mm of MAP movement and 3.61±8.13° of external axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −8.80±3.32 mm of LAP movement, −3.81±1.03 mm of MAP movement and an axial rotation of 11.34±3.78°. From 30=90° knee flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated 4.37±8.26 mm of LAP movement, 0.12±7.95 mm of MAP movement and 0.79±11.43° of axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −4.28±3.13 mm of LAP movement, −1.11±2.76 mm of MAP movement and axial rotation of 6.54±4.33°. From 0°-maximum flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated −2.71±5.37 mm of LAP movement, 1.79±4.88 mm of MAP movement and 5.99±5.26° of axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −17.83±6.04 mm of LAP movement, −9.11±4.93 mm of MAP movement and axial rotation of 23.66±7.81°. Overall, the BCR subject displayed kinematic patterns similar to those of a normal knee; more detailed numbers will be presented in the presentation. Discussion. Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced excellent weight-bearing flexion and kinematic patterns similar to the normal knee, but less in magnitude. These subjects experienced posterior femoral rollback in early and late flexion. During mid-flexion, subjects having a PCR TKA did experience some variable motion patterns, which may be due to the absence of the ACL. Subjects having a BCR TKA experienced more continuous rollback throughout flexion, more similar to the normal knee. Similar to the normal knee, subjects having a PCR TKA did experience progressive axial rotation throughout knee flexion (Figures). Significance. While they still experience normal-like rollback during early (0°–30°) and late flexion (90°-120°), subjects with a PCR TKA consistently demonstrated Anteriorization of the joint in mid-flexion

Kinematics of human joints have been studied using various methods of observation for millennia, including cadaver dissection, mechanical tests, and more recently photogrammetric gait analysis. For just over sixteen years, dynamic single-plane radiographic observations have been used to quantitatively characterize the motions of anatomic and prosthetically replaced joints. These observations have improved the understanding, in particular, of knee function and the influence of prosthetic design and surgical technique on knee kinematics and patient function. Other studies have reported the kinematics of the hip, shoulder, spine and foot/ankle. It is clear that advances in the technologies to acquire and quantify radiographic images of the skeleton in motion can have a major impact on joint mechanics research and, ultimately, clinical diagnosis. This lecture will highlight two avenues of development in our laboratory: open-source software for determining skeletal kinematics from radiographic images, and a novel robotic imaging platform for observing the skeleton in motion. Our group is working on an open-source shape-matching software application that will be freely available to anyone who wishes to use it (sourceforge.net/projects/jointtrack). This flexible platform will allow the modular addition of new capabilities as plug-in components written in a wide range of languages (C++, Python, Java, etc.), and makes heavy use of other open-source and public libraries (I.C.E., OpenGL, VTK, ITK). All of our future developments will use this platform so that the latest results will be available to all, and hopefully other users will share their advances collaboratively. We currently have created a graphical user interface for performing single-plane model-image registration, and are currently working to expand this to handle bi-plane imaging. We also are developing a robotic platform to permit radiographic imaging of human joints during normal, unrestricted, dynamic activities. This platform will move the x-ray source and sensor in response to the patient’s unconstrained motion, providing views with greater diagnostic potential than are acquired with fixed or c-arm imaging systems. This same imaging platform will also provide an extremely flexible platform for cone-beam tomography, so that a single system will be able to perform all imaging functions required for skeletal model-image registration based kinematic measurements. The goal of these endeavors is to advance the possibility that dynamic radiographic analysis of joint motion will soon be a useful, accurate, and routine diagnostic and measurement tool available to enhance the efforts of orthopaedic surgeons in the treatment of their patients

Aims: To determine the effects of tibial component rotation and posterior slope on kinematics following Scor-pio navigated TKR in cadaver specimens. Methods: Knee kinematics were monitored using a validated Infra Red Navigation System. Ten normal comparable cadaver specimens were mounted in a custom rig allowing assessment of kinematics under various loading conditions. The specimens then underwent Navigated TKR. The surgery was performed as per normal operating surgical protocols by an expert knee surgeon. However an augmented tibial component was implanted allowing the researchers to precisely modify its rotation and posterior slope. A pneumatic cylinder attached to the quadriceps tendon was then used to repetitively flex and extend the knee with a variety of applied loads. Results: Kinematics were different after TKR. Increasing posterior slope resulted in increasing posterior position of the femur, particularly at maximum flexion. Posterior slope also resulted in a deviation of the neutral path of motion and alteration of the normal envelope of laxity. Tibial component malrotations over 5 degrees resulted in deviations of the neutral path of motion without affecting the envelope of laxity. A combined malrotations over 10 degrees with posterior slopes over 6 degrees resulted in prosthetic subluxation under certain loading conditions. Discussion: Knee kinematics are different after TKR. Increasing internal and external malrotation as well as the addition of posterior slope resulted in deviations of TKR kinematics through alteration of the neutral path of movement and or the envelope of laxity. Combined misalignments of slope and rotation resulted in the greatest deviations from normal kinematics and in some cases, prosthetic subluxation. Incompatibilities of alignment may result in increased ligament tension and component articulation dysfunction that may contribute to premature wear and loosening. Surgeons should be aware of this when considering the addition of posterior slope or assessing tibial component positioning in TKR

AIMS: To determine the effects of tibial component rotation and posterior slope on kinematics following Scorpio CR navigated TKR in cadaver specimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: Knee kinematics were monitored using a validated IR Navigation System. Ten normal comparable cadaver specimens were mounted in a custom rig allowing assessment of kinematics under various loading conditions. The specimens then underwent Navigated TKR. The surgery was performed as per normal operating surgical protocols by an expert knee surgeon. However an augmented tibial component was implanted allowing the researchers to precisely modify its rotation and posterior slope. A pneumatic cylinder attached to the quadriceps tendon was then used to repetitively flex and extend the knee with a variety of applied loads. Kinematics were different after TKR. Increasing posterior slope resulted in increasing posterior position of the femur, particularly at maximum flexion. Posterior slope also resulted in a deviation of the neutral path of motion and alteration of the normal envelope of laxity. Tibial component malrotations over 5 degrees resulted in deviations of the neutral path of motion without affecting the envelope of laxity. Combined malrotations over 10 degrees with posterior slopes over 6 degrees resulting in prosthetic subluxation under certain loading conditions. Discussion: Knee kinematics are different after TKR. Increasing internal and external tibial component malrotation as well as the addition of posterior slope resulted in deviations of TKR kinematics through alteration of the neutral path of movement and or the envelope of laxity. Combined misalignments of slope and rotation resulted in the greatest deviations from normal kinematics and in some cases, prosthetic subluxation. Incompatibilities of alignment may result in increased ligament tension and component articulation dysfunction that may contribute to premature wear and loosening. Surgeons should be aware of this when considering the addition of posterior slope or assessing tibial component positioning in TKR

Background

Musculoskeletal disorders, including low back pain, affects 68% of UK physiotherapists across their career with patient handling considered a key risk factor. Manual handling training is mandatory for all allied health professionals, however there is limited research investigating whether professionals adopt recommended manual handling principles following training.