We compared the clinical outcomes of curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy (CVO) with bone impaction grafting (BIG) with CVO alone for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This retrospective comparative study included 81 patients with ONFH; 37 patients (40 hips) underwent CVO with BIG (BIG group) and 44 patients (47 hips) underwent CVO alone (CVO group). Patients in the BIG group were followed-up for a mean of 12.2 years (10.0 to 16.5). Patients in the CVO group were followed-up for a mean of 14.5 years (10.0 to 21.0). Assessment parameters included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), complication rates, and survival rates, with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and radiological failure as the endpoints.Aims
Methods
Severe acetabular dysplasia with established dislocation of the hip represents a common problem in cerebral palsy. Once significant dysplasia is present little remodeling of the acetabulum occurs with femoral osteotomies alone. Pelvic osteotomies should address the problem of acetabular deficiency in order to restore optimal coverage of the femoral head. Standard innominate oste-otomies are not recommended for neuromuscular hip dysplasia. To address the
Objective: Severe acetabular dysplasia with established dislocation of the hip represents a common problem in cerebral palsy. Once significant dysplasia is present little remodeling of the acetabulum occurs with femoral osteotomies alone. Pelvic osteotomies should address the problem of acetabular deficiency in order to restore optimal coverage of the femoral head. Standard innominate osteotomies are not recommended for neuromus-cular hip dysplasia. To address the