Aims. Postoperative malalignment of the femur is one of the main complications in distal femur fractures. Few papers have investigated the impact of intraoperative malalignment on postoperative function and bone healing outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate how intraoperative fracture malalignment affects postoperative bone healing and functional outcomes. Methods. In total, 140 patients were retrospectively identified from data obtained from a database of hospitals participating in a trauma research group. We divided them into two groups according to coronal plane malalignment of more than 5°: 108 had satisfactory fracture alignment (< 5°, group S), and 32 had unsatisfactory alignment (> 5°, group U). Patient characteristics and injury-related factors were recorded. We compared the rates of nonunion, implant failure, and reoperation as healing outcomes and Knee Society Score (KSS) at three, six, and 12 months as functional outcomes. We also performed a sub-analysis to assess the effect of fracture malalignment by plates and nails on postoperative outcomes. Results. The rates of nonunion and reoperation in group U were worse than those in group S (25.0% vs 14.3%; 15.6% vs 5.6%), but the differences were not significant (p = 0.180 and p = 0.126, respectively). Mean KSS in group U at all follow-up periods was significantly worse that in group S (75.7 (SD 18.8) vs 86.0 (SD 8.7); p < 0.001; 78.9 (SD 17.2) vs 89.1 (SD 9.8); p < 0.001; 85.0 (SD 11.9) vs 91.1 (SD 7.2); p = 0.002, respectively). In the sub-analysis of plates, mean KSS was significantly worse in group U at three and six months. In the sub-analysis of nails, the rate of reoperation was significantly higher in group U (28.6% vs 5.8%; p = 0.025), and mean KSS at six and 12 months was significantly worse in Group U. Conclusion. To obtain good postoperative functional results, intraoperative alignment of the coronal plane should be accurately restored to less than 5°. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(2):165–172

Objectives. Elevated proximal tibial bone strain may cause unexplained pain, an important cause of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision. This study investigates the effect of tibial component alignment in metal-backed (MB) and all-polyethylene (AP) fixed-bearing medial UKAs on bone strain, using an experimentally validated finite element model (FEM). Methods. A previously experimentally validated FEM of a composite tibia implanted with a cemented fixed-bearing UKA (MB and AP) was used. Standard alignment (medial proximal tibial angle 90°, 6° posterior slope), coronal malalignment (3°, 5°, 10° varus; 3°, 5° valgus), and sagittal malalignment (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°, 12°) were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the volume of compressively overstrained cancellous bone (VOCB) < -3000 µε. The secondary outcome measure was maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone (MSCB) over a medial region of interest. Results. Varus malalignment decreased VOCB but increased MSCB in both implants, more so in the AP implant. Varus malalignment of 10° reduced the VOCB by 10% and 3% in AP and MB implants but increased the MSCB by 14% and 13%, respectively. Valgus malalignment of 5° increased the VOCB by 8% and 4% in AP and MB implants, with reductions in MSCB of 7% and 10%, respectively. Sagittal malalignment displayed negligible effects. Well-aligned AP implants displayed greater VOCB than malaligned MB implants. Conclusion. All-polyethylene implants are more sensitive to coronal plane malalignments than MB implants are; varus malalignment reduced cancellous bone strain but increased anteromedial cortical bone stress. Sagittal plane malalignment has a negligible effect on bone strain. Cite this article: I. Danese, P. Pankaj, C. E. H. Scott. The effect of malalignment on proximal tibial strain in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A comparison between metal-backed and all-polyethylene components using a validated finite element model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:55–64. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0186.R2

Objectives. Malalignment of the tibial component could influence the long-term survival of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The object of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effect of varus and valgus malalignment on the tibial component under stance-phase gait cycle loading conditions. Methods. Validated finite element models for varus and valgus malalignment by 3° and 5° were developed to evaluate the effect of malalignment on the tibial component in TKA. Maximum contact stress and contact area on a polyethylene insert, maximum contact stress on patellar button and the collateral ligament force were investigated. Results. There was greater total contact stress in the varus alignment than in the valgus, with more marked difference on the medial side. An increase in ligament force was clearly demonstrated, especially in the valgus alignment and force exerted on the medial collateral ligament also increased. Conclusion. These results highlight the importance of accurate surgical reconstruction of the coronal tibial alignment of the knee joint. Varus and valgus alignments will influence wear and ligament stability, respectively in TKA. Cite this article: D-S. Suh, K-T. Kang, J. Son, O-R. Kwon, C. Baek, Y-G. Koh. Computational study on the effect of malalignment of the tibial component on the biomechanics of total knee arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:623–630. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.611.BJR-2016-0088.R2

An increasingly used treatment for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis is total ankle replacement (TAR). However, implant loosening and subsidence are commonly reported complications, leading to relatively high TAR failure rates. Malalignment of the TAR has often been postulated as the main reason for the high incidence of these complications. It remains unclear to what extent malalignment of the TAR affects the stresses at the bone-implant interface. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the effect of TAR malalignment on the contact stresses on the bone-implant interface, thereby gaining more understanding of the potential role of malalignment in TAR failure. FE models of the neutrally aligned as well as malaligned CCI Evolution TAR implant (Van Straten Medical) were developed. Separate models were developed for the tibial and talar segment, with the TAR components in neutral alignment and 5° and 10° varus, valgus, anterior and posterior malalignment, resulting in a total of 9 differently aligned TAR models. Loading conditions of the terminal stance phase of the gait cycle, when the force on the ankle joint is highest (5.2x body weight), were applied. Peak and mean contact pressure and shear stress at the bone-implant interface were analyzed. Also, stress distributions on the bone-implant interface were visualized. In the neutrally aligned tibial and talar TAR models, peak contact pressures of respectively 98.4 MPa and 68.2 MPa, and shear stresses of respectively 49.3 MPa and 39.0 MPa were found. TAR malalignment increases peak contact pressure and shear stress on the bone-implant interface. A maximum peak contact pressure of 177 MPa was found for the 10° valgus malaligned tibial component and the highest shear stress found was 98.5 MPa for the 10° posterior malaligned talar model. Upon TAR malalignment contact stresses increase substantially, suggesting that proper orientation of the TAR is needed to minimize peak stresses on the bone-implant interface. This is in line with previous studies, which state that malalignment considerably increases bone strains, micromotion, and internal TAR contact pressures, which might increase the risk of TAR failure. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between increased contact stresses at the bone-implant interface and TAR failure

Introduction and Objective. Malunion after trauma can lead to coronal plane malalignment in the lower limb. The mechanical hypothesis suggests that this alters the load distribution in the knee joint and that that this increased load may predispose to compartmental arthritis. This is generally accepted in the orthopaedic community and serves as the basis guiding deformity correction after malunion as well as congenital or insidious onset malalignment. Much of the literature surrounding the contribution of lower limb alignment to arthritis comes from cohort studies of incident osteoarthritis. There has been a causation dilemma perpetuated in a number of studies - suggesting malalignment does not contribute to, but is instead a consequence of, compartmental arthritis. In this investigation the relationship between compartmental (medial or lateral) arthritis and coronal plane malalignment (varus or valgus) in patients with post traumatic unilateral limb deformity was examined. This represents a specific niche cohort of patients in which worsened compartmental knee arthritis after extra-articular injury must rationally be attributed to malalignment. Materials and Methods. The picture archiving system was searched to identify all 1160 long leg x ray films available at a major metropolitan trauma center over a 12-year period. Images were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, namely patients >10 years after traumatic long bone fracture without contralateral injury or arthroplasty to give 39 cases. Alignment was measured according to established surgical standards on long leg films by 3 independent reviewers, and arthritis scores Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) and Kellegren-Lawrence (KL) were recorded independently for each compartment of both knees. Malalignment was defined conservatively as mechanical axis deviation outside of 0–20 mm medial from centre of the knee, to give 27 patients. Comparison of mean compartmental arthritis score was performed for patients with varus and valgus malalignment, using Analysis of Variance and linear regression. Results. In knees with varus malalignment there was a greater mean arthritis score in the medial compartment compared to the contralateral knee, with OARSI scores 5.69 vs 3.86 (0.32, 3.35 95% CI; p<0.05) and KL 2.92 vs 1.92 (0.38, 1.62; p<0.005). There was a similar trend in valgus knees for the lateral compartment OARSI 2.98 vs 1.84 (CI −0.16, 2.42; p=0.1) and KL 1.76 vs 1.31 (CI −0.12, 1.01; p=0.17), but the evidence was not conclusive. OARSI arthritis score was significantly associated with absolute MAD (0.7/10mm MAD, p<0.0005) and Time (0.6/decade, p=0.01) in a linear regression model. Conclusions. Malalignment in the coronal plane is correlated with worsened arthritis scores in the medial compartment for varus deformity and may similarly result in worsened lateral compartment arthritis in valgus knees. These findings support the mechanical hypothesis that arthritis may be related to altered stress distribution at the knee, larger studies may provide further conclusive evidence

Patellofemoral complications are among the important reasons for revision knee arthroplasty. Femoral component malposition has been implicated in patellofemoral maltracking, which is associated with anterior knee pain, subluxation, fracture, wear, and aseptic loosening. Rotating-platform mobile bearings compensate for malrotation between the tibial and femoral components. It has been suggested that rotating bearings may also reduce the patellofemoral maltracking resulting from femoral component malposition. We constructed a dynamic musculoskeletal model of weight-bearing knee flexion in a knee implanted with posterior cruciate-retaining arthroplasty components (LifeMOD/KneeSIM, LifeModeler Inc). The model was validated using tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics and forces measured in cadaver knees on an Oxford knee rig. Knee kinematics and patellofemoral forces were measured after simulating axial malrotation of the femoral component (±3° of the transepicondylar reference line). Differences in patellofemoral kinematics and forces between the fixed- and rotating-bearing conditions were analysed. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component affected tibial rotation near full extension and tibial adduction at higher flexion angles. In the fixed-bearing conditions, external rotation of the femoral component increased patellofemoral lateral tilt, patellofemoral lateral shift, and patellofemoral lateral shear forces. Up to 6° of bearing rotation relative to the tibia was noted in the rotating-bearing condition. However, the rotating bearing had minimal effect in reducing the patellofemoral maltracking or shear induced by femoral component rotation. The rotating bearing does not appear to be forgiving of malalignment of the extensor mechanism resulting from femoral component malrotation. The rotating bearing may correct tibiofemoral axial malrotation near full extension but not at higher knee flexion angles. These results support the value of improving existing methodologies for accurate femoral component alignment in knee arthroplasty

Introduction. Total ankle replacement (TAR) is surgically complex; malalignment can arise due to surgical technique or failure to correct natural varus/valgus malalignment. Across joint replacement, malalignment has been associated with pain, component edge loading, increased wear and higher failure rates. Good component alignment is considered instrumental for long term TAR success. The conforming surface geometry of mobile bearing TARs leaves no freedom for coronal plane malalignment. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effect of coronal alignment on a mobile bearing TAR. Methods. Three TARs (Zenith, Corin Group) were tested under five coronal malalignment angles from 0–10° in a single station electromechanical knee simulator applying a typical ankle gait profile. As swing phase load is critical to TAR contact mechanics but will vary depending on the joint laxity. Swing loads of 100N, 300N and 500N were investigated. A positive control test with a swing load of 1000N was also studied, and was expected to eliminate the majority of lift off effects. Under each condition, the version was allowed to move freely while tests were performed, and the version profile under each alignment angle was recorded. Each test was carried out for 600 cycles in 25% bovine serum. Under the same loading conditions, but without lubrication, a Tekscan sensor recorded data from two cycles to assess the change in contact pressure and area at the five coronal angles. Results. Across the three TARs the effect of the swing phase load varied the biomechanics with a similar pattern. The high swing load of 1000N eliminates the majority of version while with 100N swing loads the TAR abducts for the length of the swing phase only realigning when the force increases, the extent dependent on the malalignment angle. At both 300N and 500N swing loads there is an oscillation apparent which changes the contact mechanics. The Tekscan results (Figure 1b) show changes in the contact area at three points in the load cycle; swing, the lower peak and the peak load (Figure 1a). With any degree of malalignment, component lift off is highly prevalent under lower swing phase loads of 100–300N. As the swing load is increased, this effect is only noticeable at greater malalignment angles. Discussion. The observed component lift off results in edge loading and peak pressures occurring at the insert edges. When the insert is 10 degrees coronally malaligned and the insert is brought fully into contact, the peak pressure reaches 16–18MPa, a pressure similar to the yield stress of polyethylene. The high contact pressures will likely elevate the wear and may increase the potential for polyethylene failure. Conclusion. Biomechanical testing has shown the malalignment of a total ankle replacement combined with the joint tension may change the contact mechanics and potentially increase wear. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Abstract. OBJECTIVE. Knee varus malalignment increases medial knee compartment loading and is associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression and severity. 1. Altered biomechanical loading and dysregulation of joint tissue biology drive OA progression, but mechanistic links between these factors are lacking. Subchondral bone structural changes are biomechanically driven, involve bone resorption, immune cell influx, angiogenesis, and sensory nerve invasion, and contribute to joint destruction and pain. 2. We have investigated mechanisms underlying this involving RANKL and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), which reflect bone resorption and mineralisation respectively. 3. and the axonal guidance factor Sema3A. Sema3A is osteotropic, expressed by mechanically sensitive osteocytes, and an inhibitor of sensory nerve, blood vessel and immune cell invasion. 4. Sema3A is also differentially expressed in human OA bone. 5. HYPOTHESIS: Medial knee compartment overloading in varus knee malalignment patients causes dysregulation of bone derived Sema3A signalling directly linking joint biomechanics to pathology and pain. METHODS. Synovial fluid obtained from 30 subjects with medial knee OA (KL grade II-IV) undergoing high tibial osteotomy surgery (HTO) was analysed by mesoscale discovery and ELISA analysis for inflammatory, neural and bone turnover markers. 11 of these patients had been previously analysed in a published patient-specific musculoskeletal model. 6. of gait estimating joint contact location, pressure, forces, and medial-lateral condyle load distribution in a published data set included in analyses. Data analysis was performed using Pearson's correlation matrices and principal component analyses. Principal Components (PCs) with eigenvalues greater than 1 were analysed. RESULTS. PC1 (32.94% of variation) and PC2 (25.79% of variation) from PCA analysis and correlation matrices separated patients according to correlated clusters of established inflammatory markers of OA pain and progression (IL6/IL8, r=0.754, p<0.001) and anti-inflammatory mediators (IL4/IL10, r=0.469, p=0.005). Bone turnover marker ALP was positively associated with KL grade (r=0.815, p=0.002) and negatively associated with IL10 (r=−0.402, p=0.018) and first peak knee loading pressures (r=−0.688, p=0.019). RANKL was positively associated with IL4 (r=0.489, p=0.003). Synovial fluid Sema3A concentrations showed separate clustering from all OA progression markers and was inversely correlated with TNF-α (r=−0.423, p=0.022) in HTO patients. Sema3A was significantly inversely correlated with total predicted force in the medial joint compartment (r=−0.621, p=0.041), mean (r=−0.63, p=0.038) and maximum (r=−0.613, p=0.045) calculated medial compartment joint pressures during the first phase and mean (r=−0.618, p=0.043) and maximum (r=−0.641, p=0.034) medial compartment joint pressures during midstance outputs of patient-specific musculoskeletal model. CONCLUSIONS. This study shows joint inflammatory status and mechanical overloading influence subchondral bone-remodelling. Synovial Sema3A concentrations are inversely correlated to patient-specific musculoskeletal model estimations of pathological medial overloading. This study reveals Sema3A as a biological mediator with capacity to induce OA pain and disease progression that is directly regulated by gait mechanical loading. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is an effective treatment for knee arthritis. One long held principle of TKRs is positioning the components in alignment with the mechanical axis to restore the overall limb alignment to 180 ± 3 degrees. However, this view has been challenged recently. Given the high number of replacements performed, clarity on this integral aspect is necessary. Our objective was to investigate the association between malalignment and outcome (both PROMs and revision) following primary TKR. Metod. A systematic review of MEDLINE, CINHAL, and EMBASE was carried out to identify studies published from 2000 onwards. The study protocol including search strategy can be found on the PROSPERO database for systematic reviews. Results. From a total of 2107 citations, 18 studies, comprising of 2,214 patients, investigated the relationship between malalignment and PROMs. Overall 41 comparisons were made between a malalignment parameter and a PROM. Eleven comparisons (27%) demonstrated an association between malalignment and worse PROMs, with 30 comparisons (73%) demonstrating no association. Eight studies investigated the relationship between malalignment and revision. Four studies found an association between a measure of coronal alignment and revision rate, with four not demonstrating an association. Only one study examined axial and sagittal alignment and found an association with revision rates. Conclusion. When considering malalignment in an individual parameter, there is an inconsistent relationship with outcome. Malalignment may be related to worse outcome, but if that relationship exists it is weak and of dubious clinical significance. However, this evidence is subject to limitations mainly related to the methods of assessing alignment post operatively and by the possibility that the premise of traditional mechanical alignment is erroneous. Larger longitudinal studies with a standardised, timely, and robust method for assessing alignment outcomes are required. Level of evidence. 2a

In recent years, the use of computed tomography (CT) has made it possible to obtain without distortion images of axial sections of the patella with the knee in the first 15°–20° of flexion. We performed CT examinations on 27 patients aged between 11 and 17 years. We considered patients who had anterior knee pain with or without a feeling of patellar instability. CT examinations were performed with the knee flexed to 15° with and without quadriceps contraction. The tomograms obtained were analysed considering: (1) the congruence angle (CA), (2) the patellar tilt angle (PTA), (3) the sulcus angle (SA) and (4) trochlear depth (TD). We performed CT examinations on a control group of 20 patients aged between 11 to 17 years. Statistical analysis was performed by using the analysis of variation (ANOVA) test or the Student’s t-test on paired or unpaired data. The difference between control knees and symptomatic knees was significant for all of the CT variables (unpaired t-test). Malalignment detected with the quadriceps relaxed was typed according to the classification of Schutzer et al. as follows: type I – lateralised patella, 13 knees (24.1%); type II – lateralised and tilted patella, 24 knees (44.4%); and type III – tilted patella, 12 knees (22.2%). In 26 knees (48.2%), CT examination with quadriceps in contraction gave the same findings as CT examination with the quadriceps relaxed, i.e. type and severity of malalignment were identical. In the remaining 28 knees (51.8%), CT examination with the quadriceps in contraction gave different results from the CT examination with the quadriceps relaxed. The greater sensitivity and specificity of CT as compared with conventional radiographic methods in the diagnosis of patellofemoral malalignment have been demonstrated. Our results show that there is a relationship between clinical findings and CT data. CT assessment with the quadriceps relaxed permitted us to divide the knees into three types of patellofemoral malalignment. To our knowledge, not many studies have been performed with the quadriceps contracted. In the present study, in 48.2% of knees there were no differences between CT assessment with the quadriceps relaxed and with the quadriceps contracted in either type or severity of malalignment. In contrast, in the remaining 51.8% of symptomatic knees we found differences. Before planning an operation in patients with anterior knee pain with or without patellar instability, CT assessment both with the quadriceps relaxed and contracted permits a reliable documentation of malalignment, permitting the surgeon to select the optimal treatment

Abstract. Objectives. Stem malalignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor long-term outcomes and increased complications (e.g. periprosthetic femoral fractures). Our understanding of the biomechanical impact of stem alignment in cemented and uncemented THA is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effect of stem fixation method, stem positioning, and compromised bone stock in THA. Methods. Validated FE models of cemented (C-stem – stainless steel) and uncemented (Corail – titanium) THA were developed to match corresponding experimental model datasets; concordance correlation agreement of 0.78 & 0.88 for cemented & uncemented respectively. Comparison of the aforementioned stems was carried out reflecting decisions made in the current clinical practice. FE models of the implant positioned in varus, valgus, and neutral alignment were then developed and altered to represent five different bone defects according to the Paprosky classification (Type I – Type IIIb). Strain was measured on the femur at 0mm (B1), 40mm (B2), and 80mm (B3) from the lesser trochanter. Results. Cemented constructs had lower strain on the implant neck, and higher overall stiffness and strain on bone compared to uncemented THA. Strain on the bone increased further down the shaft of the femoral diaphysis, and with progressing bone defect severity in all stem alignment cases. Highest strain on the femur was found at B2 in all stem alignment and bone defect models. Varus alignment showed higher overall femoral strain in both fixation methods. Interestingly, in uncemented models, highest strain was shown on femoral bone proximally (B1-B2) in varus alignment, but distally (B3) in neutral alignment. Conclusion. Varus stem alignment showed overall higher strain on femur compared to neutral and valgus. This highlights the crucial role of stem alignment in long term outcomes of THA. Differences between the two stem types should be taken in consideration when interpreting results from this study

Recently, it has been reported that the posterior stabilised implant clinically used for the total knee replacement (TKR) may have a risk of failures caused by pressure and stress concentrated on the tibial post. Malalignment of the implant or variable loading applied to the implant are one of the major causes of the failure in posteriori stabilised TKR. The purpose of this study is to biomechanically analyse the effect of implant malalignment on the failure risk of the implant in posteriori stabilised TKR by estimating von-Mises stress on the implant. Finite element models of a knee joint and a posteriori stabilised implant were developed from 1mm slices of CT images and 3D CAD software, respectively. The posterior stabilised implant consists of a femoral component, a tibial post, and a tibial tray. The finite element models of TKR for the neutral alignment case as well as the different malalignment cases (3° and 5° of valgus and varus angulations, 2° and 4° of anterior and posterior tilts, and 3° of external rotation) were developed. Then, the von-Mises stress, which is which was chosen as the fracture risk parameter, acting on the implant were analysed by using CAE software. Loading condition at the 40% of one whole gait cycle such as 2000N of compressive load, 25N of anterior-posterior load, and 6.5Nm of torque was applied to the TKR models. The maximum von-Mises stresses were concentrated on the anterior region of the tibial post regardless of the oblique loadings. In the rotationally additional loading (3° of external rotation), excessive stresses occurred in the anterior medial and posterior lateral areas. The maximum stress was 18.3MPa in neutral position. The maximum stress increased by 10% in anterior tilt 2°, 15% in anterior tilt 4°, 25% in posterior tilt 2°, 54% in posterior tilt 4°, 116% in varus 3°, 262% in varus 5°, 318% in valgus 3°, 389% in valgus 5°, 6% in external rotation 3° compared with that in the neutral position case. In addition, 32.0MPa of maximum stress occurred on the posterior lateral area of the base component in rotationally additional loading. The results showed that the implant malalignment could accelerate the stress concentration on the anterior region of the tibial post as in the result of clinical study. In the case of additional rotation, high stress concentration on the anterior medial and posterior lateral areas as well as on the tibial base surface could generate wear or fracture of tibial post. From the additional rotation case, we can expect that higher conformity implant will generate higher stress concentrations than lower conformity implant even though we did not compare the effect of conformity ratio on the stress concentration in the tibial polyethylene component. This study showed that careful consideration of the implant malalignment would be necessary to improve the clinical outcome in the posteriori stabilised TKR

Femoral stem varus has been associated with poorer results. We report the incidence of varus/valgus malalignment of the Exeter polished, double taper design in a multicentre prospective study. The surgical outcomes at a minimum of five year and complication rates are also reported. A multicentre prospective study of 987 total hip replacements was undertaken to investigate whether there is an association between surgical outcome and femoral stem malalignment. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Oxford hip score (OHS) at five years. Secondary outcomes included the rate of dislocation and revision. The incidence of varus and valgus malignment were 7.1% and 2.6% respectively. There was no significant difference in OHS between neutral and malaligned femoral stems at 5 years (neutral, mean = 40.2; varus, mean 39.3, p = 0.465; valgus, mean = 40.9, p = 0.605). There was no significant difference in dislocation rate between the groups (p = 0.66). There was also no significant difference in revision rate (p = 0.34). This study provides evidence that the Exeter stem is extremely tolerant of varus and valgus malalignment, both in terms of outcome and complication rate

Introduction. Torsional malalignment syndrome (TMS) is a unique combination of rotational deformities in the lower limb, often leading to severe patellofemoral joint pain and disability. Surgical management of this condition usually consists of two osteotomies in each affected limb, with simultaneous correction of both femoral anteversion and external tibial torsion. However, we believe that a single supratubercular osteotomy followed by tibial derotation with the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) can be used to provide a significant improvement in both appearance and function. Materials and Methods. This is a retrospective case analysis in which we will be reviewing 16 osteotomies performed by one surgeon between 2006 and 2017. The study includes 11 patients with a mean age of 16.7 ± 0.8 years. Pre and post-operatively, patients were fully evaluated through history and physical examination, and CT rotational profiling. Statistical analyses were performed in order to determine whether or not any observed clinical or cosmetic improvements were statistically significant. Results. The results show significant improvements in scores reported on post-operative functional assessment, with mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) increasing by 18.3 and mean Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) also increasing by 31.4. In addition to this, post-operative clinical assessment showed a reduced thigh-foot angle (TFA) in all cases, by a mean value of 31.9o. The angle of the transmalleolar axis (TMA) was successfully reduced in 14/16 cases, by a mean value of 8.6o. Statistical analysis showed all of these results to be statistically significant where p<0.05. Conclusions. The results show that supratubercular osteotomy, followed by gradual correction with TSF, can be used to provide a significant improvement in both appearance and function for patients suffering from TMS

Femoral shaft fractures are fairly common injuries in paediatric age group. The treatment protocols are clear in patients of age less than 4 years and greater than 6 years. The real dilemma lies in the age group of 4–6 years. The aim of this study is to find whether a conservative line should be followed, or a more aggressive surgical intervention can provide significantly better results in these injuries. This study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Bhubaneswar, India from January 2020 to March 2021. A total of 40 patients with femur shaft fractures were included and randomly divided in two treatment groups. Group A were treated with a TENS nail while group B were treated with skin traction followed by spica cast. They were regularly followed up with clinical and radiological examination to look out for signs of healing and any complications. TENS was removed at 4–9 months’ time in all Group A patients. Group A patients had a statistically significant less hospital stay, immobilisation period, time to full weight bearing and radiological union. Rotational malunions were significantly lower in Group A (p-value 0.0379) while there was no statistically significant difference in angular malunion in coronal and sagittal plane at final follow up. Complications unique to group A were skin necrosis and infection. We conclude that TENS is better modality for treatment of shaft of femur fractures in patients of 4–6 years age as they significantly reduce the hospital stay, immobilization period and rotational malalignment

Background. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of femorotibial alignment (FTA), femoral and tibial component alignment, correction of malalignment, and thickness of tibial osteotomy on implant loosening following total knee replacement. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 107 knees in 65 patients with a minimum of six months of follow-up. The 107 knees were operated by two surgeons using BS4+ (Bisurface 4 plus) implant (Japan Medical Materials, Japan); the femoral component was cemented, and the tibial component was either cemented or not cemented by using four screws. All the replacements were performed under same operative procedure with medial para-patellar approach and measured bone technique. The knees were classified into two groups (: I and U) on the basis of postoperative radiological findings that indicate the loosening of tibial components. First, there were not any apparent loosening symptom like radio-lucent lines nor sinking; group-I (intact, n=75). Second, there were some radio-lucent lines around tibial component; subgroup-R (radio-lucent lines, n=25), or some subsidence of component over 2 mm; subgroup-S (subsidence, n=7), and the latter two subgroups were put into group-U (unstable, n=32) all together. We measured preoperative and postoperative alignment (overall FTA, correction of malalignment, and alignment of the tibial and the femoral component in the coronal plane). Furthermore, each thickness of tibial osteotomy was measured with use of preoperative and postoperative radiographs of the knee. These parameters including patient's BMI were compared between two major groups statistically to evaluate the factor influencing the stability of tibial components. Moreover, the thickness of tibial osteotomy were compared between two subgroups. Results. Radio-lucent lines were seen in any fixation (cement: 14, cementless: 11), but subsidence were found in 7 cementless screwed fixation. Average alignment of femorotibia or component were satisfactory (judged by the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation), and were not different between two groups. We found that the change of FTA (I: 9.5 versus U: 12.9 degrees) and the outlier of FTA (I: 2.4 versus U: 3.1 degrees) were greater in group-U than those in group-I (p=0.002, p=0.023). In the thickness of tibial osteotomy, no significant differences were seen between two major groups, but the osteotomy were thicker in subgroup-S (12.0 mm) than in subgroup-R (9.6 mm, p = 0.03). Another parameters including BMI were not different between two groups, respectively. Conclusions. Attaining neutrality is important in stabilizing tibial component of total knee replacement. However, the larger the correction of malalignment, the more unstable the fixation of component tend to become. High-flexion femoral component designs including BS4+ require the removal of 2 to 3 mm more bone from the component-bone interface than with standard implants, generally. Nevertheless, thicker osteotomy of tibia may be a risk factor of subsidence of tibial component. We should take into account cement fixation in such cases like severe malalignment or thicker osteotomy in total knee replacement

Numerous dynamic studies have evaluated the tibiofemoral contact pressures that follow total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and several static studies utilizing finite elements and pressure sensitive film have evaluated malalignment. The objective of this study was to compute the in vivo dynamic tibiofemoral contact forces for normal alignment and evaluate the change in contact pressure with increasing malalignment of the femoral component. A three-dimensional computational model of the lower limb during deep flexion was created using Kane’s method of dynamics. A hybrid approach was used to determine the boundary conditions of the model. The motions of a total knee arthroplasty patient were measured using fluoroscopy. The motions of the patient were varied from the normal motions to simulate malalignment of the femoral component. The change in forces with malalignments of up to 10° valgus, 10° varus, 10° internal rotation, and 10° internal rotation were determined. An increase in the axial tibiofemoral contact force from 2.44 times body weight (BW) to 2.62 BW and a decrease in the quadriceps force from 6.8 to 5.65 BW were observed with varus malalignment. The medial-lateral patellofemoral contact force decreased from 0.95 BW to 0.1 BW with 10° varus positioning of the femur and increased to 2.2 BW with 10° valgus positioning of the femur and a decrease in the patellar ligament forces from 1.70 to 1.63 BW was observed. Changes in the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral forces of 1–2 BW were observed as the femur was malaligned with respect to the tibia. The most significant of these changes was the medial-lateral patellofemoral contact force. The implications of these findings are that malalignment could result in increased patellar subluxation or increased wear of the polyethylene component. Concerns were raised that this initial subject evaluated may not have had optimum alignment, thus leading to more optimal bearing surface stress conditions with varus malalignment. Future studies will be evaluated for subjects having the joint line restored to conditions for non-implanted knees

The objective of this study was to compute the in vivo dynamic tibiofemoral contact forces for normal alignment, and then evaluate the change in contact forces and pressures with increasing varus-valgus and internal-external rotational malalignment of the femoral component. A three-dimensional computational model of the lower limb during deep knee bend was created using Kane’s method of dynamics. The change in forces from normal with malalignment of up to 10° valgus, 10° varus, 10° internal axial femoral rotation, and 10° internal axial femoral rotation were determined. In this study, varus-valgus malalignment had the greatest effect on medial-lateral pattelofemoral contact forces, with a maximum increase of 2.25 times body weight for 10° valgus malalignment. Axial malalignment had the greatest influence on tibiofemoral contact forces

The Q angle is defined as the angle formed by a line passing from the anterior-superior iliac spine and the centre of the patella and another line passing this point to the centre of the tibial tuberosity. Normal values reported in the literature for the Q angle widely range between 12.7° (± 0.72°) and 18.8° (± 4.7°). This variability depends on individual anatomical variations and method of measurement as well. In fact, several factors can affect the measurement of Q angle. The correct evaluation is carried out with a goniometer, in supine position and the knee in full extension. Q angle evaluation can be biased by standing position and quadriceps contraction, which can increase the Q angle; in contrast, knee flexion can reduce it. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the Q angle increases from external to internal rotation of the tibia, while it decreases from pronation to supination of the foot. Finally, patellar malalignment in the horizontal plane, such as subluxation or dislocation, causes a decrease in the Q angle, as the centre of the patella is laterally shifted. The accuracy of Q angle measurement can be also affected by an error in identifying the anatomical landmarks. An error in Q angle measurement below 5° requires an error in setting the anatomical landmarks of no greater than 2 mm. Several authors have shown that the Q angle is greater in females, as the proximal landmarks are more lateral and a greater valgus alignment is necessary to reestablish a correct mechanical axis of the limb. According to the side, there is no evidence that Q angle is symmetric. The clinical significance of the Q angle is controversial. An increased Q angle was considered for a long time as the main cause of anterior knee pain and an important risk factor for patella subluxation or dislocation. Some authors showed a correlation between Q angle increase and symptomatic patellar chondromalacia. However, others showed no significant differences in Q angle values between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Presently, there is not sufficient clinical evidence that an increased Q angle predisposes to knee problems. Furthermore, it is impossible to assert that all the alterations of the extensor mechanism are exclusively due to an increase in the Q angle, as they can depend on other factors, such as: functional overloading of the knee, muscle and ligament insufficiency, bone and chondral morphological changes, malalignment or asymmetric length of the inferior limbs and foot alterations. In conclusion, a homogeneous method of measurement and correct data interpretation are necessary to clarify the conundrum of Q angle. Moreover, it is important to understand that patellofemoral malalignment is not always the cause of knee pain and instability. This can reduce the risk of performing surgical procedures of extensor mechanism realignment that are technically perfect but potentially harmful