Introduction. The primary purpose of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), aside from pain relief, is to restore hip biomechanics such that the patient experiences no discernible functional deficit, while also providing an environment conducive to implant longevity. Key factors in determining a successful THA include achieving the desired pre-operative femoral offset and leg length, as well as the restoration of range of motion (ROM). Minor leg length discrepancies (LLDs), less than a centimetre, are common after THA and usually well tolerated. However, in some patients, even these small discrepancies are a source of dissatisfaction. More significant discrepancies can be a risk factor for more serious concerns such as nerve injury, abnormal gait and chronic pain. The level of the femoral neck osteotomy is a critical step in reproducing a planned femoral stem position. Frequently the femoral osteotomy is too high and can lead to an increase in leg length and varus stem positioning. If the desired implant positions are identified from preoperative 3D templating, a planned femoral osteotomy can be used as a reference to recreate the correct leg length and offset. The aim of this study was assess the accuracy of a 3D printed patient-specific guide for delivering a pre-planned femoral neck osteotomy. Methodology. A consecutive series of 33 patients, from two surgeons at a single institution, were sent for Trinity OPS pre-operative planning (Optimized Ortho, Australia). Trinity OPS is a pre-operative, dynamic, patient-specific modelling system for acetabular and femoral implant positioning. The system requires a pre-operative CT scan which allows patient specific implant sizing as well as positioning. Once the preoperative implant positioning plan was confirmed by the surgeon, a patient-specific guide was designed and printed to enable the planned level of femoral neck osteotomy to be achieved, Fig 1. All patients received a Trinity cementless acetabular component (Corin, UK) and a cementless TriFit TS femoral component (Corin, UK) through a posterior approach. The achieved level of osteotomy was confirmed postoperatively by doing a 3D/2D registration, in the Mimics X-ray Module (Materialise, Belgium), of the planned 3D resected femur to the postoperative AP radiograph, Fig 2. The image was then scaled and the difference between the planned and achieved level of osteotomy was measured (imatri Medical, South Africa), Fig 2. Results. The mean absolute difference between the planned and achieved osteotomy level was 0.7mm (range 0.1mm − 6.6mm). Only 1 patient had a difference of more than 3mm, Fig 3. Of the 33 patients, 28 had a difference of less than 1mm. Conclusions. The results from this initial series of 33 patients suggest that a 3D printed patient-specific guide can be a simple and accurate way of intraoperatively reproducing a planned femoral neck osteotomy, though there was one significant outlier. Whether the 3D planning, patient-specific guide and accurate femoral osteotomy can then be used to achieve precise leg length and offset recreation is the subject of an on-going evaluation

Background. Accurate placement of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is critical to optimize implant longevity. Commercially available patient-specific instrumentation systems can improve implant placement, but may involve considerable expense and production delays of up to six weeks. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel technique for in-house production of 3D-printed, patient-specific glenoid guides, and compare the accuracy of glenoid guidepin placement between the patient-specific guide and a standard guide using a cadaveric model. Methods. Twenty cadaveric shoulder specimens were randomized to receive glenoid guidepin placement via standard TSA guide (Wright Medical, Memphis, TN) or patient-specific guide. Three-dimensional scapular models were reconstructed from CT scans with Mimics 20.0 imaging software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). A pre-surgical plan was created for all specimens for the central glenoid guidepin of 0º version and inclination angles. Central pin entry and exit points were also calculated. Patient-specific guides were constructed to achieve the planned pin trajectory in Rhino3D software (Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle, WA). Guides were 3D-printed on a Form2 printer with Formlabs Dental SG Resin (Formlabs, Somerville, MA). Glenoid labrum and cartilage were removed with preservation of other soft tissues in all specimens to mimic intraoperative TSA conditions. A fellowship-trained, board-eligible orthopaedic surgeon placed a 2.5 mm diameter titanium guidepin into each glenoid using the assigned guide for each specimen. After pin placement, repeat CT scans were performed, and a blinded measurer used superimposed 3D scapular reconstructions to calculate deviation from the pre-surgical plan in version and inclination angles, dot product angle, and guide pin entry and exit points. Student's t tests were performed to detect differences between pin placements for the two groups. Results. Cadaver age, sex, and BMI did not differ between groups (p>0.05 for all). Average production cost and time for the patient-specific guides were $29.95 and 4 hours and 40 minutes per guide, respectively. Guidepin version deviation did not differ between the patient-specific and standard guides (1.59º ± 1.60º versus 2.88 º ± 2.11º, respectively, p=0.141). Guidepin inclination deviation was significantly lower in the patient-specific group (1.54º ± 1.58º versus 6.42º ± 5.03º, p=0.009), similarly the dot product angle was lower in the patient-specific compared to standard guide group (2.35º ± 1.66º versus 7.48º ± 4.76º, p=0.005). Glenoid entry site exhibited less deviation for the patient-specific compared to standard guide (0.75mm ± 0.54mm versus 2.05mm ± 1.19mm, p=0.006). Glenoid exit site also was closer to the target for the patient- specific compared to standard group (1.75mm ± 0.99mm versus 4.75mm ± 2.97mm, p=0.010). Conclusion. We present a novel technique for in-house production of 3D-printed, patient-specific glenoid guides for TSA glenoid pin placement. These patient-specific guides improved pin placement accuracy based on 3D-CT measurements compared to standard TSA guides in a cadaveric model. Our patient-specific glenoid guides can be produced on-demand, in-house, inexpensively, and with significantly reduced time compared to commercially available guides. Future studies are required to validate these findings in clinical applications and determine the potential impact on implant longevity

Introduction. Computer-assisted methods for acetabulum cup navigation have shown to be able to improve the accuracy of the procedure, but are time-consuming and difficult to use. The goal of this project was to develop an easy-to-use navigation technique, requiring minimal equipment for acetabular cup alignment. Material. A preoperative CT scan was obtained, a 3D model of the acetabulum was created, the pelvic plane determined and the cup orientation planned. A registration area, which included the accessible part of the acetabular fossa and the surrounding articular surface, was chosen for the individualised guide. A guidance cylinder, aligned along the planned cup orientation, was attached in the centre of the guide. To transfer the planned alignment information from the registered guide to the impacting of the cup, we developed an intraoperative guidance method based on inertia sensors. The sensors were aligned orthogonal to the central cylinder of the patient-specific guide and the orientation was recorded. At the time of impacting the cup, the sensors were attached to the impactor and the surgeon used the recorded information for the alignment of the impactor. Results. To measure the accuracy of the proposed registration method, we performed an in-vitro trial on three fresh-frozen hemipelves with seven participants. The deviation between the planned and registered inclination averaged 3.01° (StDev 5.7). In anteversion, we measured an average error of 4.33° (StDev 2.8). We tested the feasibility of the proposed method in a clinical trial. The postoperative radiographic measured angles in this trial were 45° anteversion (planned 45°) and 25° inclination (planned 20°). Discussion. We introduce a novel method for computer-assisted cup alignment, which is easy to integrate into the surgical workflow. Our preliminary results suggest that this method is accurate. However, further clinical studies are necessary to verify its clinical feasibility and accuracy

Aims. Proper preoperative planning benefits fracture reduction, fixation, and stability in tibial plateau fracture surgery. We developed and clinically implemented a novel workflow for 3D surgical planning including patient-specific drilling guides in tibial plateau fracture surgery. Methods. A prospective feasibility study was performed in which consecutive tibial plateau fracture patients were treated with 3D surgical planning, including patient-specific drilling guides applied to standard off-the-shelf plates. A postoperative CT scan was obtained to assess whether the screw directions, screw lengths, and plate position were performed according the preoperative planning. Quality of the fracture reduction was assessed by measuring residual intra-articular incongruence (maximum gap and step-off) and compared to a historical matched control group. Results. A total of 15 patients were treated with 3D surgical planning in which 83 screws were placed by using drilling guides. The median deviation of the achieved screw trajectory from the planned trajectory was 3.4° (interquartile range (IQR) 2.5 to 5.4) and the difference in entry points (i.e. plate position) was 3.0 mm (IQR 2.0 to 5.5) compared to the 3D preoperative planning. The length of 72 screws (86.7%) were according to the planning. Compared to the historical cohort, 3D-guided surgery showed an improved surgical reduction in terms of median gap (3.1 vs 4.7 mm; p = 0.126) and step-off (2.9 vs 4.0 mm; p = 0.026). Conclusion. The use of 3D surgical planning including drilling guides was feasible, and facilitated accurate screw directions, screw lengths, and plate positioning. Moreover, the personalized approach improved fracture reduction as compared to a historical cohort. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(1):46–52

PURPOSE

To validate the efficacy and accuracy of a novel patient specific guide (PSG) and instrumentation system that enables minimally invasive (MI) short stemmed total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

Patient Specific Instruments (PSIs) are becoming an increasingly common method to provide surgeons with assistance in accurately performing procedures; however, to our knowledge, these new instruments have only been applied to traditional, highly invasive surgical approaches. However, PSIs have the potential to decreased surgical invasiveness by reducing the surgeon's need to clearly visualise anatomical landmarks. Therefore, we designed and evaluated a novel PSI for minimally invasive shoulder arthroplasty.

The proposed minimally invasive approach prevents en face access to the articular surfaces and thus the PSI was designed to guide the accurate placement of a trans-humeral bone tunnel which would permit surgical steps to be conducted. To accurately create this tunnel and place a guide pin in the glenoid, the PSI was designed as a two sided guide that incorporates unique anatomical features from both bones, which would lock the two bones in a predefined pose relative to one another. Proper registration of the PSI is aided by the joint's passive compression force, which is not disrupted due to the soft tissue sparing approach. Once the bones are locked together, a guide pin could be passed through the humeral head – creating a bone tunnel to guide later humeral bone preparation – and into the glenoid to guide reaming and drilling. By designing the guide in this way, it is possible to avoid the need to perform surgical steps with a clear en face view.

The PSI was created by loading 3D reconstructed CT models of the humerus and scapula into a CAD package, aligning the desired humeral and scapular guide axes such that the bones' relative pose is fully defined, and finally constructing the guide itself between and around the articular surfaces, such that sufficient anatomical features are incorporated to provide complete physical registration with the bones. This PSI was subsequently customised, based on a cadaveric specimen and fabricated using a 3D printer. The PSI's usability and accuracy in achieving the pre-operative plan were then assessed using optical tracking and surface based registration procedure.

Results of the evaluation demonstrated that the designed PSI is capable of accurately registering the two bones to within 5mm and 14° of the intended pre-operative plan, while also effectively reducing the invasiveness of the surgical procedure. Therefore, this novel PSI may represent a new avenue to improve the clinical impact of CAOS systems, by achieving good surgical accuracy, but with a greatly reduced invasiveness.

Introduction & aims

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) is a useful tool to execute pre-operatively planned surgical cuts and reduce the number of trays in surgery. Debate currently exists around improved accuracy, efficacy and patient outcomes when using PSI cutting guides compared to conventional instruments. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) revision to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) represents a complex scenario in which traditional bone landmarks, and patient specific axes that are routinely utilised for component placement may no longer be easily identifiable with either conventional instruments or navigation. PSI guides are uniquely placed to solve this issue by allowing detailed analysis of the patient morphology outside the operating theatre. Here we present a tibia and femur PSI guide for TKA on patients with UKA.

Introduction & aims

Resurfacing of the patella is an important part of most TKA operations, usually using an onlay technique. One common practice is to medialise the patellar button and aim to recreate the patellar offset, but most systems do not well control alignment of the patella button. This study aimed to investigate for relationships between placement and outcomes and report on the accuracy of patella placement achieved with the aid of a patella Patient Specific Guide (PSG).

Introduction

Patient specific surgical guide (PSSG) is a relatively new technique for accurate total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and there are many reports supporting PSSG can reduce the rate of outlier in the coronal plane. We began to use PSSG provided by Biomet (Signature®) and have reported the same results. Before using Signature, we performed TKA by modified gap technique (parallel cut technique) to get the well balanced flexion gap. Signature is the one of the measured resection technique using the anatomical landmarks as reference points on the images of CT or MR taken before surgery. We usually measure the center gap width and gap balance during operation with the special device “knee balancer”(Fig. 1) that can be used on patella reposition. After cutting all of the bone with Signature, gap balance in the extension position was very good but the gap balance was shown slight lateral opening in the 90 degrees flexion position. So we have changed the surgical procedure. We use Signature for cutting only distal femur and proximal tibia to get extension gap and apply the modified gap technique to decide the rotation of the femoral component (Signature with modified gap technique).

The purpose of this study is to compare the gap balance between the two techniques.

Abstract. Introduction. The optimal alignment technique for total knee replacement (TKR) remains controversial. We previously reported six-month and two-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing kinematically (KA) versus mechanically (MA) aligned TKR. In the present study, we report 12-year results from this trial. Methods. The original cohort included 88 TKRs (44 KA using Shape Match patient-specific guides and 44 MA using conventional instrumentation), performed from 2008 to 2009. After IRB approval, the health record of the original 88 patients were queried. Revisions, re-operations, and complications were recorded. The non-deceased patients were contacted via phone. Reoperation and complications were documented via the patient's history. Further, a battery of patient-reported outcome measures (including patient satisfaction, WOMAC, Oxford, KOOS Jr, Forgotten Joint Score, and M-SANE) were obtained. Results. Of the original 88 patients in the study, 15 patients had a least one reoperation (17%). Patella problems were the most common cause of reoperation accounting for 5/8 reoperations in the KA group versus 3/7 in the MA group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two alignment methods in terms of major and minor complications or reoperations. At the 12-year follow-up, 26 patients died leaving 62 patients for follow-up. Of these, 48 patients (77%) were successfully contacted. The kinematically aligned total knees self-reported better satisfaction (96% versus 82%), but no difference in other patient-reported outcome measures compared to mechanically aligned TKRs. Conclusion. KA TKR demonstrates excellent mid to long-term results compared to MA TKR with similar reoperations, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures

This paper presents an ongoing review of the use of a wedge-shaped porous metal augments in the shoulder to address glenoid retroversion as part of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Seventy-five shoulders in 66 patients (23 women and 43 men, aged 42 to 85 years) with Walch grade B2 or C glenoids underwent porous metal glenoid augment (PMGA) insertion as part of aTSA. Patients received either a 15º or 30º PMGA wedge (secured by screws to the native glenoid) to correct excessive glenoid retroversion before a standard glenoid component was implanted using bone cement. Neither patient-specific guides nor navigation were used. Patients were prospectively assessed using shoulder functional assessments (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS], American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], visual analogue scale [VAS] pain scores and forward elevation [FE]) preoperatively, at three, six, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, with similar radiological surveillance. Forty-nine consecutive series shoulders had a follow-up of greater than 24 months, with a median follow-up of 48 months (range: 24–87 months). Median outcome scores improved for OSS (21 to 44), ASES (24 to 92), VAS (7 to 0), and FE (90º to 140º). Four patients died, but no others were lost to follow-up. Apart from one infection at 18 months postoperatively and one minor peg perforation, there were no complications, hardware failures, implant displacements, significant lucency or posterior re-subluxations. Radiographs showed good incorporation of the wedge augment with correction of glenoid retroversion from median 22º (13º to 46º) to 4º. All but four glenoids were corrected to within the target range (less than 10º retroversion). The porous metal wedge-shaped augments effectively addressed posterior glenoid deficiency as part of aTSA for rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis, producing satisfactory clinical outcomes with no signs of impending future failure

Summary Statement. In this study, excellent positioning of custom-made glenoid components was achieved using patient-specific guides. Achieving the preoperatively planned orientation of the component improved significantly and more screws were located inside the scapular bone compared to implantations without such guide. Introduction. Today's techniques for total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty are limited when dealing with severe glenoid defects. The available procedures, for instance the use of bone allografts in combination with available standard implants, are technically difficult and tend to give uncertain outcomes (Hill et al. 2001; Elhassan et al. 2008; Sears et al. 2012). A durable fixation between bone and implant with optimal fit and implant positioning needs to be achieved. Custom-made defect-filling glenoid components are a new treatment option for severe glenoid defects. Despite that the patient-specific implants are uniquely designed to fit the patient's bone, it can be difficult to achieve the preoperatively planned position of the component, resulting in less optimal screw fixation. We hypothesised that the use of a patient-specific guide would improve implant and screw positioning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of a newly developed patient-specific guide for implant and screw positioning, by comparing glenoid implantations with and without such guide. Patients & Methods. Large glenoid defects, representative for the defects encountered in clinical practice, were created in ten cadaveric shoulders. A CT scan of each cadaver was taken to evaluate the defects and to generate three-dimensional models of the scapular bones. Based on these models, custom glenoid components were designed. Furthermore, a newly developed custom guide was designed for five randomly selected shoulders. New CT scans were taken after implantation to generate 3D models of the bone and the implanted component and screws. This enabled to compare the experimentally achieved and preoperatively planned reconstruction. The location and orientation of the glenoid component and screw positioning were determined and differences with the optimal preoperative planning were calculated. Results. An excellent component positioning (difference in location: 1.4±0, 7mm; difference in orientation: 2, 5±1, 2°) was achieved when using the guide compared to implantations without guidance (respectively 1, 7±0, 5mm; 5, 1±2, 3°). The guide improved component orientation significantly (P<0.1). After using the guide, all screws were positioned inside the scapular bone whereas 25% of the screws placed without guidance were positioned outside the scapular bone. Discussion/Conclusion. In this study, excellent positioning of custom-made glenoid components was achieved using patient-specific guides. Achieving the preoperatively planned orientation of the component improved significantly and more screws were located inside the scapular bone compared to implantations without such guide

Introduction. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative navigation platform for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring native knee joint kinematics and strains in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) during squatting motions. Method. Six cadaver lower limbs underwent computed tomography scans to design patient-specific guides. Using these scans, bony landmarks and virtual single-line collateral ligaments were identified to provide intraoperative real-time feedback, aided in bone resection, implant alignment, tibiofemoral kinematics, and collateral ligament elongations, using the navigation platform. The specimens were subjected to squatting (35°-100°) motions on a physiological ex vivo knee simulator, maintaining a constant 110N vertical ankle load regulated by active quadriceps and bilateral hamstring actuators. Subsequently, each knee underwent a medially-stabilized TKA using the mechanical alignment technique, followed by a retest under the same conditions used preoperatively. Using a dedicated wand, MCL and LCL insertions—anterior, middle, and posterior bundles—were identified in relation to bone-pin markers. The knee kinematics and collateral ligament strains were analyzed from 3D marker trajectories captured by a six-camera optical system. Result. Both native and TKA conditions demonstrated similar patterns in tibial valgus orientation (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE=1.7°), patellar flexion (RMSE=1.2°), abduction (RMSE=0.5°), and rotation (RMSE=0.4°) during squatting (p>0.13). However, a significant difference was found in tibial internal rotation between 35° and 61° (p<0.045, RMSE=3.3°). MCL strains in anterior (RMSE=1.5%), middle (RMSE=0.8%), and posterior (RMSE=0.8%) bundles closely matched in both conditions, showing no statistical differences (p>0.05). Conversely, LCL strain across all bundles (RMSE<4.6%) exhibited significant differences from mid to deep flexion (p<0.048). Conclusion. The novel intraoperative navigation platform not only aims to achieve planned knee alignment but also assists in restoring native knee kinematics and collateral ligament behavior through real-time feedback. Acknowledgment. This study was funded by Medacta International (Castel San Pietro, Switzerland)

Purpose: We compare the accuracy and precision of patient-specific plastic guides versus computer-assisted navigation for distal radius osteotomy (DRO). We hypothesize that guides would provide similar accuracy and precision compared to computer-assisted surgery, and that they would be faster to use than navigated surgery. Method: We used CT scans, computer models, and planned corrections of radii from seven patients who had previously received computer-assisted DRO. The planned correction included the locations and directions of the screw holes for the fixation plate on the intact deformed radius. Using computer-assisted technique, the surgeon drills the holes for the fixation plate using computer navigation before performing the osteotomy; after cutting the radius, the plate is fixated to the distal radius, and the distal radius is distracted until the holes in the proximal radius align with the holes of the fixation plate. A patient-specific guide can be manufactured that fits on the intact deformed radius to guide the drilling of the screw holes. The guide is designed so that it mates exactly with the dorsal surface of the radius. Each guide was designed using custom software and manufactured in ABS plastic using a 3D printer. The surgeon places the guide on the radius and uses a metal drill sleeve in each guide hole to guide the drilling of the plate screw holes. We manufactured urethane plastic phantoms of the seven deformed radii. Our laboratory experiment had six surgeons each perform four computer-assisted and four patient-specific guide procedures on the phantom radii; the specimen and type of guidance were randomly chosen. The time from the start of the procedure to when the shaping of the distal radius was completed was recorded; we did not record the time required to cut and fixate the radius because this time does not depend on the type of guidance used. The plated phantoms were assessed for errors in ulnar variance, radial inclination, and volar tilt as compared to the planned correction. Results: The results for the computer-assisted procedures were: ulnar variance error (−0.2 +/ − 2.0 mm), radial inclination error (−0.9 +/ − 6.1 deg), volar tilt error (−0.9 +/ − 1.9 deg). The results for the customized jig procedures were: ulnar variance error (−0.7 +/ − 0.6 mm), radial inclination error (−1.0 +/ − 1.4 deg), volar tilt error (−0.4 +/ − 2.2 deg). There were no significant differences detected in the means of the measurements (significance level 0.05) using the two-sample t-test. Significant differences were detected in the variances of the ulnar variance and radial inclination errors (significance level 0.05) using Levene’s test. It took (705 +/ − 144 sec) to perform the computer-assisted procedures and (214 +/ − 98 sec) to perform the customized guide procedures. The differences between the means and variances were statistically significant. Conclusion: Patient-specific guides are as accurate, more precise, and require less time than computer-assisted navigation for DRO

Introduction. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is an attractive surgical option for physically active patients with early osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. Unfortunately use of this surgical technique is frequently accompanied by an unintended increase in the posterior tibial slope, resulting in anterior tibial translation, and consequent altered knee kinematics and cartilage loading(1). To address this unintended consequence, it has been recommended that the relative opening of the anteromedial and posterolateral corners of the osteotomy are calculated pre-operatively using trigonometry (1). This calculation assumes that the saw-cut is made parallel to the native posterior slope; yet given the current reliance on 2D images and the ‘surgeon's eye’ to guide the saw-cut, this assumption is questionable. The aim of this study was to explore how accurately the native posterior tibial slope is reproduced with a traditional freehand osteotomy saw-cut, and whether novel 3D printed patient-specific guides improve this accuracy. Methods. 26 fourth year medical students with no prior experience of performing an osteotomy were asked to perform two osteotomy saw-cuts in foam cortical shell tibiae; one freehand, and one with a 3D printed surgical guide (Embody, London) that was designed using a CT scan of the bone model. The students were instructed to aim for parallelity with a hinge pin which had been inserted (with the use of a highly conforming 3D printed guide) parallel to the posterior slope of the native joint. For the purpose of analysis, the sawbones were consistently orientated along their mechanical and anatomical tibial axes using custom moulded supports. Digital photographs taken in the plane of the osteotomy were analysed with ImageJ software to calculate the angular difference in the sagittal plane between the hinge-pin and saw-cut. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v21 (Chicago, Illinois); a paired t-test was used to compare the freehand and patient-specific guide techniques. Statistical significance was set at a p-value <0.05. Results. Using the traditional freehand technique, the mean difference in angle between the hinge pin and osteotomy saw-cut was 5.40 (SD 4.6), which contrasted with 1.40(SD 1) when the osteotomy was performed using a 3D printed guide [See Figure 1]. This difference was significant (p<0.001). Discussion. This study highlights the large degree of error in the posterior slope of an osteotomy saw-cut when performed using a freehand technique, and which is likely to be a factor in the unintended change in tibial slope commonly observed in post-operative patients. We found that a 3D printed patient-specific osteotomy guide significantly improved the accuracy and reduced the variability of this procedure. A follow-up multi-centre clinical trial is currently underway to ascertain whether these results are replicated in-vivo

The treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and associated extra-articular deformity of the leg is challenging. Current teaching recognises two possible approaches: (1) a total knee replacement (TKR) with intra-articular bone resections to correct the malalignment or (2) an extra-articular osteotomy to correct the malalignment together with a TKR (either simultaneously or staged). However, a number of these patients only have unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and, in the absence of an extra-articular deformity would be ideal candidates for joint preserving surgery such as unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) given its superior functional outcome and lower cost relative to a TKR [1). We report four cases of medial unicondylar knee replacement, with a simultaneous extra-articular osteotomy to correct deformity, using novel 3D printed patient-specific guides (Embody, UK) (see Figure 1). The procedure was successful in all four patients, and there were no complications. A mean increase in the Oxford knee score of 9.5, and in the EQ5D VAS of 15 was observed. To our knowledge this is the first report of combined osteotomy and unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of extra-articular deformity and knee osteoarthritis. This technically challenging procedure is made possible by a novel 3D printed patient-specific guide which controls osteotomy position, degree of deformity correction (multi-plane if required), and orientates the saw-cuts for the unicompartmental prosthesis according to the corrected leg alignment. Using 3D printed surgical guides to perform operations not previously possible represents a paradigm shift in knee surgery. We suggest that this joint preserving approach should be considered the preferred treatment option for suitable patients

A prospective randomized trial on 128 patients with end-stage osteoarthritis was conducted to assess the accuracy of patient-specific guides. In cohort A (n = 64), patient- specific guides from four different manufacturers (Subgroup A1 Signature ®, A2 Trumatch ®, A3 Visionaire ® and A4 PSI ®) were used to guide the bone cuts. Surgical navigation was used as an intraoperative control for outliers. In cohort B (n = 64), conventional instrumentation was used. All patients of cohorts A and B underwent a postoperative full-leg standing X-ray and CT scan for measuring overall coronal alignment of the limb and three-planar alignment of the femoral and the tibial component. Three-planar alignment was the primary endpoint. Deviation of more than three degrees from the target in any plane, as measured with surgical navigation or radiologic imaging, was defined as an outlier. In 14 patients (22%) of cohort A, the use of the patient-specific guide was abandoned because of outliers in more than one plane. In 18 patients (28%), a correction of the position indicated by the guide, was made in at least one plane. A change in cranial-caudal position was most common. Cohort A and B showed a similar percentage of outliers in long-leg coronal alignment (24.6%, 28.1%, p = 0.69), femoral coronal alignment (6.6%, 14.1%, p = 0.24) and femoral axial alignment (23%, 17.2%, p = 0.50). Cohort A had more outliers in coronal tibial alignment (14.6%) and sagittal tibial alignment (21.3%) than cohort B (3.1%, p = 0.03 and 3.1%, p = 0.002, respectively). These data indicate that patient specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients who were revised using a new generation custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC) for component loosening and large acetabular defect (Paprosky 3A and 3B) after previous total hip arthroplasty (THA). New generation CTACs involve the use of patient-specific drill guides and incorporate three-dimensional printed bone models, enhancing precision during surgical implantation. Data were extracted from a single centre prospective database of patients with large acetabular defects who were treated with a new generation CTAC. Patients were included if they had a minimum follow-up of five years. The modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EurQol EuroQoL five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) utility, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), including visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, were gathered at baseline, and at two- and five-year follow-up. Reasons for revision, and radiological and clinical complications were registered. Trends over time are described and tested for significance (p<0.05). A total of 49 (70%) of 70 patients with a mean age of 73.5 years (SD 7.7) had a complete follow-up of 5 years. A significant improvement was found in HOOS, mOHS, EQ-5D-3L utility and NRS, VAS pain rest and activity between baseline and final follow-up. Complications included 8 cases with loosening screws, 4 with bony fractures, 4 periprosthetic infections and 2 cases with dislocation. One patient with bilateral pelvic discontinuity had revision surgery due to recurrent dislocations. No revision surgery was performed for screw failure or implant breakage. New generation CTAC in patients with THA acetabular loosening and massive acetabular bone loss (Paprosky 3A and 3B) can result in stable constructs and significant improvement in functioning and health-related quality of life at five years’ follow-up

Patient specific instruments have been developed in response to the conundrum of limited accuracy of intramedullary and extramedullary alignment guides and chaos caused by computer assisted orthopaedic surgery. This technology facilitates preoperative planning by providing the surgeon with a three dimensional (3-D) anatomical reconstruction of the knee, thereby improving the surgeon's understanding of the preoperative pathology. Intramedullary canal penetration of the femur and tibia is unnecessary, and consequently, any potential for fat emboli is eliminated. Component position and alignment are improved with a decrease in the number of outliers. Patient specific instruments utilise detailed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scans of the patient's knee with additional images from the hip and ankle for determination of critical landmarks. From these studies a 3-D model of the patient's knee is created and with integration of rapid prototyping technology, guides are created to apply to the patient's native anatomy to direct the placement of the cutting jigs and ultimately the placement of the components. The steps in considering utilization of patient specific guides are as follows: 1) the surgeon determines that the patient is a candidate for TKA, 2) an MRI or CT scan is obtained at an approved facility in accordance with a specific protocol, 3) the MRI or CT is forwarded to the manufacturer, 4) the manufacturer creates the 3-D reconstructions, anatomical landmarks are identified, implant size is determined, and ultimately femoral and tibial component implant placement is determined via an algorithm, 4) the surgical plan is executed, 5) the physician reviews and modifies or approves the plan, 6) the guides are then produced via rapid prototyping technology and delivered to the hospital for the surgical procedure. Guides generated from MRIs are designed to uniquely register on cartilage surface whereas guides produced from CT scans must register on bony anatomy. There are currently two types of guides produced: those which register on the femur and tibia and allow for the placement of pins to accommodate the standard resection blocks; and those produced by some manufacturers which accommodate the saw blade and therefore are a combination of resection and pin guides. The utilization of patient-specific positioning guides in TKA has several benefits. They facilitate preoperative planning, obviate the need for violation of the intramedullary canals, reduce operating times and improve OR efficiency, decrease instrumentation requirements and thereby reduce potential for perioperative contamination. They are easier to use than computer navigation with no capital equipment purchase and no significant learning curve. Most importantly, patient-specific guides facilitate accurate component position and alignment, which ultimately has been shown to enhance long-term survivorship in total knee arthroplasty

Background:. Coronal malalignment occurs frequently in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and reduces implant longevity and function. Designed to improve consistency and efficiency, patient- specific positioning guides (PSPG) generated from preoperative imaging studies represent a paradigm shift from manual instrumentation (MI) and intraoperative computer navigation. Purposes:. We compare the efficacy of PSPG to MI in (1) restoring mechanical axis of the extremity and (2) achieving neutral alignment of the femoral and tibial components. Methods:. We retrospectively examined 696 postoperative anteroposterior standing long-leg radiographs after TKA (545 PSPG, 151 MI) by two surgeons. Coronal alignment was assessed by determining the zone in which the overall mechanical axis (OMA) passed through the knee, measuring the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between the tibial and femoral mechanical axes, and finally, noting the alignment of the femoral and tibial components with respect to their mechanical axes. Results:. The OMA passed through the central third more frequently with PSPG than MI for both surgeons (JHD: 86.6% vs. 77%, p = 0.02; AVL: 86.4% vs. 74.5%, p = 0.11). For the senior author, while percent of HKA outliers >3ï,° was similar between PSPG and MI, the mean error from neutral for these patients was significantly less with PSPG than MI (4.50ï,° vs. 5.25ï,°, p = 0.0031). The tibial component demonstrated no significant difference between PSPG and MI. With PSPG, average individual deviation from neutral for the femoral component was significantly less (0.91ï,° vs. 1.34ï,°, p = 0.0005) and had fewer outliers >2ï,° (4.9% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.017). Discussion:. Improved coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with greater patient satisfaction, better functional scores and increased implant longevity [11,30,31,36]. Recently, preoperative three-dimensional imaging and custom manufacturing have enabled the development of patient-specific positioning guides (PSPG). Designed to improve consistency and efficiency, PSPG represents a paradigm shift away from intramedullary and extramedullary guides, or manual instrumentation (MI), and an evolution from intraoperative computer-assisted navigation (CAN). Even in the hands of experienced surgeons, MI frequently results in significant component angulation and mechanical axis malalignment [32]. Multiple studies support the restoration of a neutral axis as a critical factor in implant performance and potential longevity of total knee arthroplasty [2, 3, 5, 18, 41, 44]. Intraoperative CAN has been shown to improve precision and accuracy of alignment compared to MI with a reduction in the number of outliers (less than 3ï,° varus/valgus) [32, 38] and the amount of blood loss [39], but is hindered by time-consuming landmark registration, increased operative length [7], greater cost, the risk for stress fracture, pin loosening, and a substantial learning curve [6, 22, 29, 43]. Patient-specific positioning guides, on the other hand, purportedly eliminate many of the disadvantages of CAN while still allowing the bone resections to match the measured overall mechanical axis. While accurate and precise alignment guides are potent tools in restoring the proper overall mechanical axis, they are not a substitute for careful preoperative planning, good clinical and intraoperative judgment, appropriate soft tissue balancing, and precise implantation technique. Nevertheless, patient-specific positioning guides can provide the first step in the right direction to a successful TKA. Conclusions:. Patient-specific positioning guides can assist in restoration of the mechanical axis with reduction in outliers. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case-control study