Aims: The purpose of the study was to analyse the early experience of the technique of transitory percutaneous pinning to manage three and four part proximal humeral fractures. Methods: An independent review of 66 consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures treated in our unit over a three-year period was carried out. The patients underwent closed reduction under image intensiþer guidance with percutaneous pinning using an average of 3.5 wires (range 3–4). A standard three dose prophylactic antibiotic regime was used. A protective collar and cuff was the used for 4 weeks, and a physiotherapy program of pendular movements going on to assisted active exercises started after this. The wires were typically removed in an outpatient setting at 4 to 6 weeks. Results: The postoperative radiographs were deemed satisfactory with good overall alignment by two external observers in all cases. Our þndings were however remarkable for a very high early complication rate. This included pin migration (50%), stiffness (41%), pain (33%), infection (25%), nonunion (8%) and radial nerve palsy (8%). The complication rate increased dramatically in those over the age of 50 or those with osteopenia. Conclusions: The technique of transitory percutaneous humeral pinning is technically demanding. Our early experience would suggest high rates of early complications and readmissions. This technique should be applied with caution in older patients with osteopenia

Pin placement into the medial calcaneus places a number of structures at risk of damage. Research evidence suggests that the greatest risk of posterior pin placement is to the medial calcaneal branch of the tibial nerve. By using palpable anatomical landmarks, we attempted to redefine the safe zone taking into account possible variations. The medial heel region of twenty-four cadavers was dissected to find the major structures at risk. The inferior tip of the medial malleolus (point A), insertion point of tendo calcaneus (point B), navicular tuberosity (point C) and the medial process of the calcaneal tuberosity (point D) were all selected as anatomic landmarks from which to measure the identified structures using digital electronic calipers. The commonest variation in origins of medial calcaneal nerves was found to be one arising before the bifurcation of the tibial nerve along with one arising from the medial plantar nerve (10/24). The safest zone for percutaneous pin placement has been calculated as beyond two-thirds of the distances AB, CD, AD and CB. More posterior pin placement reduces the risk of damage to the medial calcaneal nerve and its branches, although the risk remains and blunt dissection before pin placement is recommended

Objectives

There are various pin-in-plaster methods for treating fractures of the distal radius. The purpose of this study is to introduce a modified technique of ‘pin in plaster’.

Technology within medicine has great potential to bring about more accessible, efficient, and a higher quality delivery of care. Paediatric supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture in children and at our institution often have high rates of unnecessary long term clinical follow-up, leading to an inefficient use of healthcare and patient resources. This study aims to evaluate patient and clinical factors that significantly predict necessity for further clinical visits following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. A total of 246 children who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning following supracondylar humerus fractures were prospectively enrolled over a two year period. Patient demographics, perioperative course, goniometric measurements, functional outcome measures, clinical assessment and decision making for further follow up were assessed. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed and screened for significance via bivariate regression. Significant covariates were used to develop a predictive model through multivariate logistical regression. A probability cut-off was determined on the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve using the Youden index to maximize sensitivity and specificity. The regression model performance was then prospectively tested against 22 patients in a blind comparison to evaluate accuracy. 246 paediatrics patients were collected, with 29 cases requiring further follow up past the three month visit. Significant predictive factors for follow up were residual nerve palsy (p < 0 .001) and maximum active flexion angle of injured elbow (p < 0 .001). Insignificant factors included other goniometric measures, subjective evaluations, and functional outcomes scores. The probability of requiring further clinical follow up at the 3 month post-op point can be estimated with the equation: logit(follow-up) = 11.319 + 5.518(nerve palsy) − 0.108(maximum active flexion). Goodness of fit of the model was verified with Nagelkerke R2 = 0.574 and Hosmer & Lemeshow chi-square (p = 0.739). Area Under Curve of the ROC curve was C = 0.919 (SE = 0.035, 95% CI 0.850 – 0.988). Using Youden's Index, a cut-off for probability of follow up was set at 0.094 with the overall sensitivity and specificity maximized to 86.2% and 88% respectively. Using this model and cohort, 194 three month clinic visits would have been deemed medically unnecessary. Preliminary blind prospective testing against the 22 patient cohort demonstrates a model sensitivity and specificity at 100% and 75% respectively, correctly deeming 15 visits unnecessary. Virtual clinics and automated clinical decision making can improve healthcare inefficiencies, unclog clinic wait times, and ultimately enhance quality of care delivery. Our regression model is highly accurate in determining medical necessity for physician examination at the three month visit following supracondylar fracture closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. When applied correctly, there is potential for significant reductions in health care expenditures and in the economic burden on patient families by removing unnecessary visits. In light of positive patient and family receptiveness toward technology, our promising findings and predictive model may pave the way for remote health care delivery, virtual clinics, and automated clinical decision making

Introduction: To compare olecranon screw traction with percutaneous pinning for the treatment of Gartland III supracondylar fractures in children. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 151 patients between 1986 and 1996 treated with olecranon screw traction and 92 patients between 1996 and 2002 treated with percutaneous pinning. Both sets of patients were followed up clinically and radiologically following their injuries until there was evidence of fracture union and the child could demonstrate a satisfactory range of movement. Data recorded included demographics, fracture information, neurovascular injury, operation details, length of stay, length of follow up and clinical outcome. Radiographs were used to measure initial and final Baumann angles to give an indication of outcomes of distal humerus alignment. Results: Results are shown for the percutaneous pinning group with the olecranon screw traction results in brackets for comparison. The percutaneous pinning study included 54 (88) males and 38 (63) females with 63% (63%) left and 37% (37%) right elbow fractures. 46% (29%) of fractures occurred at home, 46% (56%) sustained the injury whilst playing and 7% (7%) occurred at school/nursery. The mean age was 6.0 (6.8) years with a range of 21–165 (12–168) months. The radial pulse was absent in 12% (13%). None of the fractures were open (compared with 5%). There were neurological deficits in 20% (17%). The median time to surgery was 5 hours. The fracture needed to be opened in 12% of cases as satisfactory reduction could not be achieved closed. The median stay length was 1 day (compared to a median stay on traction of 14 days). Mean follow up was 15.2 weeks. (Compared to 38.0 weeks). 2 % (3%) had cubitus varus detectable clinically. Median time to recovery for neurological deficit was 24 weeks (18 weeks). Mean initial Baumann’s angle was 74.6 degrees (73.7degrees). Mean final Baumann’s angle was 75.3 degrees (76.0 degrees). Discussion: Outcomes achieved from percutaneous pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures are similar to those from olecranon screw traction. The advantage of percutaneous pinning to both patient and provider is the reduced hospital stay and duration of follow up. Olecranon screw traction remains a possible treatment option for the management of this injury

There is no agreement as to the superiority or specific indications for cast treatment, percutaneous pinning or open fracture fixation for Bennett's fractures of the thumb metacarpal. We undertook this study to compare the outcomes of treatment for patients treated for Bennett's fracture in the medium term. We reviewed 33 patients treated in our unit for a bennett's fracture to the thumb metacarpal with closed reduction and casting. Each patient was matched with a patient treated surgically. Patients were matched for sex, age, Gedda grade of injury and hand dominance. Patients were reviewed at a minimum of 5-years and 66-patients were reviewed in total. Patients were examined clinically and also asked to complete a DASH questionnaire score and the brief Michigan hand questionnaire. Follow up plain radiographs were taken of the thumb and these were reviewed and graded for degenerative change using the Eaton-Littler score. Sixty-six patients were included in the study, with 33 in the surgical and non-surgical cohorts respectively. The average age was 39 years old. In each cohort, 12/33 were female, 19/33 were right-handed with 25% of individuals injuring their dominant hand. In each coort there were 16 Grade 1 fractures, 4 Grade 2 and 13 Grade 3 fractures. There was no difference between the surgically treated and cast-treatment cohorts of patients when radiographic arthritis, pinch grip, the brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire and pain were assessed at final review. The surgical cohort had significantly lower DASH scores at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the normalised bMHQ scores. Our study was unable to demonstrate superiority of either operative or non-operative fracture stabilization. Patients in the surgical cohort reported superior satisfaction and DASH scores but did not demonstrate any superiority in any other objectively measured domain

This study was conducted to investigate the characteristics, complications, radiologic features and clinical course of patients undergoing reduction of forearm fractures in order to better inform patient prognosis and postoperative management. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1079 pediatric patients treated for forearm fractures between January 2014 and September 2021 in a 327 bed regional medical center. A preoperative radiological assessment and chart review was performed. Percent fracture displacement, location, orientation, comonution, fracture line visibility and angle of angulation were determined by AP and lateral radiographs. Percent fracture displacement was derived by: (Displacement of Bone Shafts / Diameter) x 100% = %Fracture Displacement. Angle of angulation and percent fracture displacement were calculated by averaging AP and lateral radiograph measurements. 80 cases, averaging 13.5±8.3 years, were identified as having a complete fracture of the radius and/or ulna with 69 receiving closed reduction and 11 receiving fixation via an intramedullary device or percutaneous pinning. Eight patients (10%) experienced complications with four resulting in a refracture and four resulting in significant loss of reduction (LOR) without refracture. Fractures in the proximal ⅔s of the radius were associated with a significant increase in complications compared to fractures in the distal ⅓ of the radius (31.6% vs 3.4%) (P=.000428). Likewise, a higher percent fracture displacement was associated with a decreased risk of complications (28.7% vs 5.9% displacement)(P=0.0403). No elevated risk of complications was found based on fracture orientation, angulation, fracture line visibility, forearm bone(s) fractured, sex, age or arm affected. Our result highlights radius fracture location and percent fracture displacement as markers with prognostic value following forearm fracture. These measurements are simply calculated via pre-reduction radiographs, providing an efficient method of informing risk of complications following forearm fracture

In-office surgeries have the potential to offer high quality medical care in a more efficient, cost-effective setting than outpatient surgical centers for certain procedures. The primary concerns with operating on patients in the office setting are insufficient sterility and lack of appropriate resources in case of excessive bleeding or other surgical complications. This study serves to investigate these concerns and determine whether in-office hand surgeries are safe and clinically effective. A retrospective review of patients who underwent minor hand operations in the office setting between December 2020 and December 2021 was performed. The surgical procedures included in this analysis are needle aponeurotomy, trigger finger release, mass/foreign body removal and reduction of hand/wrist fracture with or without percutaneous pinning. No major complications requiring extended observation or hospital admission occurred. 122 of the 132 patients (92.4%) were successfully treated with no complications and only mild symptoms within one month of surgery. Five patients (3.8%) returned to the office for pain, inflammation and/or stiffness of the affected finger, with two of the five returning due to osteoarthritis and/or pseudogout flare-ups. Five additional patients returned due to incomplete treatment with continued presence of Dupuytren's contracture (3), trigger finger (1) or infected foreign body (1). One patient (0.8%) developed infection, due to incomplete removal of an infected foreign body, which was subsequently treated with antibiotics and complete foreign body removal. The absence of major complications and high success rate for minor hand procedures shows the high degree of safety and efficacy which can be achieved via the in-office setting for select procedures. While proper patient selection is key, our result shows the in-office procedure room setting can offer the necessary elements of sterility and hemostatic support for several common hand surgeries

Paediatric supracondylar fractures are the most common elbow fracture in children, and is associated with an 11% incidence of neurologic injury. The goal of this study is to investigate the natural history and outcome of motor nerve recovery following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of this injury. A total of 246 children who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning following supracondylar humerus fractures were prospectively enrolled over a two year period. Patient demographics (age, weight), Gartland fracture classification, and associated traumatic neurologic injury were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Patients with neurologic palsies were separated based on nerve injury distribution, and followed long term to monitor for neurologic recovery at set time points for follow up. Of the 246 patient cohort, 46 patients (18.6%) sustained a motor nerve palsy (Group 1) and 200 patients (82.4%) did not (Group 2) following elbow injury. Forty three cases involved one nerve palsy, and three cases involved two nerve palsies. No differences were found between patient age (Group 1 – 6.6 years old, Group 2 – 6.2 years old, p = 0.11) or weight (Group 1 – 24.3kg, Group 2 – 24.5kg, p = 0.44). A significantly higher proportion of Gartland type III and IV injuries were found in those with nerve palsies (Group 1 – 93.5%, Group 2 – 59%, p < 0 .001). Thirty four Anterior Interosseous Nerve (AIN) palsies were observed, of which 22 (64.7%) made a full recovery by three month. Refractory AIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 6.8 months post injury. Ten Posterior Interosseous Nerve (PIN) palsies occurred, of which four (40%) made full recovery at three month. Refractory PIN injuries requiring longer than three month recovered on average 8.4 months post injury. Six ulnar nerve motor palsies occurred, of which zero (0%) made full recovery at three month. Ulnar nerve injuries recovered on average 5.8 months post injury. Neurologic injury occurs significantly higher in Gartland type III and IV paediatric supracondylar fractures. AIN palsies remain the most common, with an expected 65% chance of full recovery by three month. 40% of all PIN palsies are expected to fully recover by three month. Ulnar motor nerve palsies were slowest to recover at 0% by the three month mark, and had an average recovery time of approximately 5.8 months. Our study findings provide further evidence for setting clinical and parental expectations following neurologic injury in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures

The majority of pediatric proximal humerus fractures are successfully treated non-operatively. Significantly displaced fractures have traditionally been treated surgically with percutaneous pinning. This review of twenty-three surgically treated patients demonstrates a high rate of infection associated with percutaneous pinning. The technique of cannulated screw fixation offers a safe surgical alternative for the treatment of these fractures in the adolescent population. To compare the results of percutaneous pinning to cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of pediatric proximal humerus fractures. A high complication rate, including pin tract infection and loss of reduction, was observed in the percutaneous pinning group. Given the rigid fixation afforded by cannulated screws and the minimal morbidity associated with proximal humeral physeal arrest in the older adolescent, this technique offers a safe alternative for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Average age was 13.0 years for the pinning group and 14.7 years for the cannulated screw group. Regardless of fixation technique, all fractures healed completely with no difference in rates of physeal closure. Significant pin tract drainage was encountered in six of twenty patients treated with pinning: Two with Staphylococcus Aureus infection and one deep infection requiring surgical debridement. Loss of reduction and pin migration was noted in a seventh patient. The only complication observed in the cannulated screw group was a transient axial nerve paresthesia. There were no significant differences in operative time, rate of open reduction, or length of hospitalization (p> 0.05). Twenty-three pediatric proximal humerus fractures treated operatively over a seven-year period were followed clinically and radiographically. Thirty percent of the patients treated with pinning developed pin tract infections. Similar to femoral external fixation pins, proximal humeral pins also cross a large muscle group that may result in pin micro-motion. This may create persistent drainage that ultimately leads to infection

We compared the radiographs, clinical outcomes, and complications of two techniques used for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in young adults. Fifty patients were randomized to percutaneous pinning or augmented external fixation. At one year follow-up, the external fixator did not improve the parameters of radial length, radial angulation or volar tilt. Reduction of intra-articular steps was slightly improved. No differences in DASH scores or functional outcomes were observed, but more complications were noted with the fixator. While articular restoration can be slightly improved with use of the external fixator, a higher incidence of complications and patient dissatisfaction was noted. Two common techniques for treatment of unstable distal radius fractures in young adults include percutaneous pinning combined with plaster cast, and application of an external fixator, frequently with adjunctive pinning. The objective of this study was to:. 1. To compare the short and mid-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of these two common fixation techniques. 2. To compare the complications of the two techniques. Fifty patients (< 65 yrs) with unstable fractures of the distal radius were recruited. Patients were randomized pre-operatively to percutaneous pinning or external fixation. All surgery was performed by one of three surgeons. Patients were followed for one year with radiographs and an independent clinical exam including DASH questionnaires. 86% of fractures were AO classification C2 or C3, with an equal distribution of all types in both treatment groups. Use of an external fixator did not improve the parameters of radial length, radial angulation or volar tilt. However, reduction of intra-articular steps was slightly improved with its’ use. No differences in mean DASH scores, total ROM or grip strength were observed. More pin complications were noted with the fixator, and all three patients diagnosed with RSD received external fixation. While external fixation represents a popular first line treatment for unstable distal radius fractures, this study suggests that similar gross radiographic and clinical results can be obtained with percutaneous pinning. While articular restoration can be slightly improved with use of the external fixator in highly comminuted fractures, this must be balanced by a higher incidence of complications and patient dissatisfaction. Funding: Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics

Introduction. External fixators are attached to bones with percutaneous pins and wires inserted through soft tissues and bone increasing the risk of infections. Such infections compromise patient outcomes e.g., through pin loosening or loss, failure of fixator to stabilise the fracture, additional surgery, increased pain, and delayed mobilisation. These infections also impact the healthcare system for example, increased OPD visits, hospitalisations, treatments, surgeries and costs. Nurses have a responsibility in the care and management of patients with external fixators and ultimately in the prevention of pin-site infection. Yet, evidence on best practices in the prevention of pin-site infection is limited and variation in pin-site management practices is evident. Various strategies are used for the prevention of pin-site infection including the use of different types of non-medicated and medicated wound dressings. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the use of dry gauze or iodine tulle dressings for the prevention of pin-site infections in patients with lower limb external fixators. Methodology. A retrospective study of patients with lower limb external fixators who attended the research site between 2015–2022. Setting & Sample: The setting was the outpatient's (OPD) orthopaedic clinic in a University Teaching Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Eligibility Criteria:. Over the age of 16, treated with an Ilizarov, Taylor Spatial frame (TSF) or Limb Reconstruction System (LRS) external fixators on lower limbs,. Pin-sites dressed with dry gauze or iodine tulle,. Those with pre-existing infected wounds close to the pin site and/or were on long term antibiotics were excluded. Follow Up Period: From time of external fixator application to first pin-site infection or removal of external fixator. Outcome Assessment: The primary outcome was pin-site infection, secondary outcomes included but were not limited to frequency of pin-site infection according to types of bone fixation, frequency of pin/wire removal and hospitalisation due to infection. Data analysis: IBM SPSS Version 25 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted as appropriate. Categorical data were analysed by counting the frequencies (number and percentages) of participants with an event as opposed to counting the number of episodes for each event. Differences between groups were analysed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Continuous variables were reported using mean and standard deviations and difference analysed using a two-sample independent t-test or non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney), where appropriate. Using Kaplan-Meier, survival analysis explored time to development of infection. Ethical approval: granted by local institute Research Ethics Committee on 12th March 2018. Results. During the study period, 97 lower limb external fixators were applied with 43 patients meeting the study eligibility criteria. The mean age was 38 (SD 14.1; median 37) and the majority male (n=32, 74%). At least 50% (n=25) of participants had an IIizarov fixator, with 56% (n=24) of all fixators applied to the tibia and fibula. Pin/wire sites were dressed using iodine (n=26, 61%) or dry gauze dressings (n=15, 35%). The mean age of participants in the iodine group was significantly higher than the dry gauze group (p=.012). The only significant difference between the iodine and dry gauze dressing groups at baseline was age. A total of 30 (70%) participants developed a pin-site infection with 26% (n=11) classified as grade 2 infection. Clinical presentation included redness (n=18, 42%), discharge (n=16, 37%) and pain (n=15, 35%). Over half of participants were prescribed oral antibiotics (n=28, 65%); one required intravenous antibiotics and hospitalization due to pin-site infection. Ten (23%) participants required removal of pin/wires; two due to pin-site infection. There was no association between baseline data and pin-site infection. The median time to developing an infection was 7 weeks (95%, CI 2.7 to 11.29). Overall, there were 21 (81%, n=26) pin-site infections in the iodine group and nine (60%, n=15) in the dry gauze group, difference in proportion and relative risk between the dressing groups were not statistically significant (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.86–2.12; p= .272). There was no association between baseline data, pin-site infection, and type of dressing. Conclusions. At the research site, patients are referred to the OPD orthopaedic clinic from internal and external clinical sites e.g., from Hospital Consultants, General Practitioners and occasionally from multidisciplinary teams, throughout Ireland. Our retrospective observation study found that 97 lower limb external fixators were applied over a seven-year period which is lower than that reported in the literature. However, the study period included the COVID pandemic years (2020 and 2021) which saw a lower number of external fixators applied due to lack of theatre availability, cancelled admissions and social/travel restrictions that resulted in fewer accidents and lower limb trauma cases requiring external fixator application. The study highlighted a high infection rate with 70% of participants developing pin-site infection which is in keeping with findings reporting in other studies. Our study showed that neither an iodine nor dry gauze dressing was successful in preventing pin-site infection. In the iodine group 81% of participants developed infection compared to 60% in the dry gauze group. Given the lack of difference between the two groups consideration needs to be given to the continued use of iodine dressings in the prevention of pin-site infection. Pin-site infections result in a high portion of participants being prescribed antibiotics and, in an era, that stresses the importance of antimicrobial stewardship there is a need to implement effective infection prevention and control strategies that minimise infection. Further research is therefore needed to investigate more innovative medicated dressings such as those that contain anti-microbial or anti-bacterial agents

We reviewed 16 metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) fractures treated over the four-year period 1997 to 2000. MDJ fractures occur in the area proximal to the supracondylar fossae and distal to the intersection of the metaphyseal flange and diaphysis of the humerus. MDJ fractures are far less common than displaced classic supracondylar (SC) fractures: on average we see four MDJ and 80 SC fractures a year. The mean age of patients with MDJ fractures is 4.8 years, while the mean age of patients with SC fractures is 6.3 years. MDJ fractures are more often the result of a violent force: 56% occurred in falls and 38% in pedestrian traffic accidents, while 100% of SC fractures were due to falls. Only 1% of SC fractures were compound, while 13.5% of MDJ fractures were. MDJ fractures were of the extension type in 63% and of the flexion type in 37%. Only 3.7% of SC fractures were of the flexion type. We treated four of the 16 MDJ fractures conservatively in a U-slab and 12 with percutaneous pinning (three with cross pinning, nine with one or both pins up the intramedullary shaft). At a mean follow-up of two years (1 to 4) there were 11 satisfactory and five poor results. Three of the four patients managed conservatively had a poor result with varus malunion. The other two poor results were in percutaneously pinned fractures. One was pinned in varus and one refractured after the pins were removed at three weeks. We conclude that MDJ fractures are distinct from SC fractures, and that percutaneous pinning is the best form of treatment. Because the fractures are more diaphyseal, immobilisation for four weeks rather than three is advised to prevent refracture

To compare 24-month patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment or casting in patients age 60 years of age or older with unstable distal radius fractures (DRF's). The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST), is the largest randomized, multicenter trial in Hand Surgery, which enrolled 304 adults with isolated, unstable DRF's at 24 institutions. WRIST participants were followed for 24 months- longest follow-up among prospective studies comparing four treatment methods. Patients who agreed to surgical treatment (n=187) were randomized to internal fixation with volar plate (VLPS), external fixation, or percutaneous pinning; patients who preferred conservative management (n=117) received casting. The primary outcome was 24-month Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Summary score. Secondary outcomes were MHQ Domain scores. At 24-month assessment, participants' mean MHQ Summary score was 86 (95% CI: 83,88), representing good hand function. Participants reported good return of their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with a mean MHQ ADL score of 88 (95% CI: 85,91). Finally, participants were satisfied, with a mean MHQ Satisfaction score of 84 (95% CI: 80,88). There were no significant differences in score by treatment group in any MHQ domain at 24 months. Six weeks after surgery, VLPS participants scored significantly higher than the other three groups on (ADLs) and Satisfaction (both p<0.0001), whereas participants who received external fixation scored significantly lower than the casting and VLPS groups on the same domains. By the 3-month assessment, the gap between VLPS and casting had disappeared but external fixation participants continued to report significantly worse scores. External fixation participants did not report comparable ADL scores to the other three groups until 12 months after surgery. Participants reported good outcomes 24 months after DRF regardless of treatment. Casting and VLPS are both acceptable treatments for older adults. The decision between the two treatments should be made considering patient goals regarding recovery speed and desire to avoid surgical risks. External fixation should be avoided because of worse outcomes in the year after surgery and the risk of pin site infections

Two-part surgical neck fractures, two-part greater tuberosity fractures and three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus represent a frequently encountered clinical problem. Many types of conservative treatments have been proposed, with a poor functional outcome, however; when the fracture fragments are displaced, surgery is required. Because the open reduction and the internal fixation disrupts soft tissue and increases the risk of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, closed or minimally open reduction and percutaneous pin fixation should represent an advantage. We report on 31 patients affected by fractures of the proximal humerus (n=6, two-part surgical neck fractures; n=5, with two-part greater tuberosity fractures; n=10, three-part fractures; and n=11, four- part fractures) treated with minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation. The average age was 57 years. Most of the four-part fractures were of the valgus type with no significant lateral displacement of the articular segment. A small skin incision was performed laterally at the shoulder and a rounded-tipped instrument was introduced to obtain the fracture reduction; this latter was stabilised by percutaneous pins and cannulate screws. A satisfactory reduction was achieved in most cases. The average follow-up was 24 months (range 18–47). Only one patient, with four-part fractures associated with lateral displacement of the humeral head, showed avascular necrosis and received a prosthetic implant. Minimally open reduction and percutaneous fixation is a non-invasive technique with a low risk of avascular necrosis and infection. This surgical technique allows a stable reduction with minimal soft tissue disruption and facilitates postoperative mobilisation

The Gartland extension-type supracondylar humerus fracture is the most common elbow fracture in the paediatric population. Depending on fracture classification, treatment options range from nonoperative treatment such as taping, splinting or casting to operative treatments such as closed reduction and percutaneous pinning or open reduction. Classification variability between surgeons is a potential contributing factor to existing controversy over nonoperative versus operative treatment for Type II supracondylar fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate levels of agreement in classification of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures using the Gartland classification system. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients aged 2–12 years who had sustained an extension-type supracondylar fracture and received either operative or nonoperative treatment at a tertiary children's hospital. De-identified baseline anteroposterior (AP) and lateral plain elbow radiographs were provided along with a brief summary of the modified Gartland classification system to surgeons across Canada, United States, Australia, United Kingdom and India. Each surgeon was blinded to patient treatment and asked to classify the fractures as Type I, IIA, IIB or III according to the classification system provided. A total of 21 paediatric orthopaedic surgeons completed one round of classification, of these, 15 completed a second round using the same radiographs in a reshuffled order. Kappa values using pre-determined weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess interobserver and intraobserver levels of agreement. In total, 60 sets of baseline elbow radiographs were provided to survey respondents. Interobserver agreement for classification based on the Gartland criteria between surgeons was a mean of 0.68, 95% CI [0.67, 0.69] (0.61–0.80 considered substantial agreement). Intraobserver agreement was a mean of 0.80 [0.75, 0.84]. (0.61–0.80 substantial agreement, 0.81–1 almost perfect agreement). Radiographic classification of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures at baseline demonstrated substantial agreement both between and within surgeon raters. Levels of agreement are substantial enough to suggest that classification variability is not a major contributing factor to variability in treatment between surgeons for Type II supracondylar fractures. Further research is needed to compare patient outcomes between nonoperative and operative treatment for these fractures, so as to establish consensus and a standardized treatment protocol for optimal patient care across centres

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of Type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children managed either by open reduction and internal fixation versus those treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The indications for open reduction included an inability to obtain a satisfactory reduction by closed means; open fractures and fractures with vascular compromise after closed reduction. Retrospective chart and radiograph review over a ten year period (1995–2005), with two hundred and thirty-six children with Type III fractures treated at a Level One pediatric hospital within a universal health-care system. One hundred and seventy by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning and sixty-six by open reduction. The left arm was involved in one hundred and forty-eight cases and twenty-five patients had vascular compromise at presentation but no cases required vascular repair. There were ten open fractures in the open reduction group. The anterior approach was employed in twenty-nine patients, anteromedial in twenty-two and anterolateral, medial and lateral in equal preference. Entrapped structures included brachialis muscle in thirty-four patients, periosteum in eighteen, radial nerve in two, medial nerve in two, and the brachial artery in one. According to Flynn’s criteria, the open reduction group had an excellent or good outcome in 90% of cases while the closed reduction group had an 80% excellent or good outcome. In this study of displaced Type III supracondylar fractures, there was a higher rate of open reduction than was initially anticipated. There was a higher rate of excellent and good outcomes in the ORIF group but this may be due to a relatively short follow-up in the closed reduction group. Post reduction stiffness would likely dissipate and allow a higher rate of excellent and good outcomes in the closed reduction group. An anterior approach or variation of an anterior approach is best suited to visualise the anatomy and structures hindering the reduction. Despite this, there was no clinical or radiographic difference between the approaches employed. In conclusion, open reduction and internal fixation if displaced Type III supracondylar fractures is a safe and effective procedure. An anterior approach is recommended to identify and relieve the soft tissue obstacles to a suitable reduction. Significance: This study furthers the literature that proposes to lower the threshold for open versus closed reduction of displaced supercondylar fractures in children

Introduction: The treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus is still controversial. Conservative treatment may result in severe disability due to malunion and shoulder stiffness. Open reduction and rigid fixation requires extensive soft tissue exposure, which may result in a high incidence of avascular necrosis of the proximal humerus. Today, many authors are in the opinion that “minimal osteosynthesis” of such fractures is preferable to rigid fixation. It may be achieved by K.W. techniques, lag screws, rush pins, percutaneous pinning or percutaneous external fixation. This study reviews our experience with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus treated by different minimal invasive techniques of fixation, using functional evaluation and radiological assessment. Materials and methods: This study consists of 76 patients with comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus (33 M, 44 F, 18–89 year old, mean 52/5Y) with follow-up of 2–6 years (mean 3.5Y). They were treated by minimal invasive surgical techniques: 53 of them by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning and the remaining 23 by ORIF and minimal osteosynthesis. All patients were evaluated by Neer’s shoulder grading score and radiographs. Results: Overall results were excellent and good in 85% of patients with 2, and 3 parts fractures of the proximal humerus, treated either by closed or open minimal osteosynthesis techniques, with some better results in less comminuted fractures. 9/13 (69%) of young patients with 4 part fractures treated by closed percutaneous minimal fixation had good functional results. In four other patients the clinical results were poor and two of them developed AVN of the humeral head. 5/8 (62.5%) of young patients with 4 part fractures treated by ORIF and minimal fixation had good functional results. In three other patients the clinical results were poor and one of them developed AVN of the humeral head. Conclusions: Based on this study it seems that “minimal osteosynthesis” by K.W. techniques and by lag screws, by closed or open reduction, remains as the first optional treatment of complex fractures of the shoulder, even in young patients with a 4 part fracture

Displaced proximal humerus fractures remain a difficult clinical problem, and techniques as diverse as percutaneous pinning, locked plating, intramedullary nailing, and shoulder arthroplasty have been proposed. In recent years, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become a very popular option to fix just about any fracture. However, RTSA is not without risk, with complications ranging from infection, instability, acromial stress fractures, aseptic loosening, notching and more. In a 2017 study on 39 patients, Tokish et al. compared non-operative treatment to reverse shoulder arthroplasty for displaced 3- and 4-part fractures. There was no difference in pain, range of motion or outcome scores between the two groups. Among the patients who underwent RTSA, there was no difference between early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) surgery suggesting that it could be safe to attempt a non-operative trial in most patients and see how they do. This is also supported by a 2016 study by Sanchez-Sotelo et al. in which they compared 18 patients with primary RTSA to 26 patients with failed ORIF who underwent salvage RTSA. There was no difference in ASES score, ROM and overall satisfaction between both groups suggesting that an ORIF can be attempted in many patients without the fear of compromising a revision RTSA. And although RTSA may provide more predictable results, in a properly selected patient, a well-executed hemiarthroplasty can outperform an RTSA. In a study from Molé et al., 38 patients were randomised to either RTSA or to a hemiarthroplasty. In the hemiarthroplasty group, half of the patients had <90 degrees of forward elevation and half the patients had >120 degrees of forward elevation showing a bi-modal distribution dependent on tuberosity healing. In the RTSA group, however, while having an average of 115 degrees of forward elevation, 68% of patients had less than 120 degrees of forward elevation. While RTSA is a great tool to treat complex displaced comminuted fractures in elderly patients with poor bone quality, it should not be blindly applied to all fractures types and all patients

A reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become increasingly common for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. A reverse shoulder arthroplasty is indicated especially in older and osteopenic individuals in whom the osteopenia, fracture type or comminution precludes fixation. However, there are many other ways to treat proximal humerus fractures and many of these are appropriate for different indications. Percutaneous pinning remains an option in certain surgical neck or valgus impacted proximal humerus fractures with minimal or no comminution at the medial calcar. In general, a fracture that is amenable to open reduction and fixation should be fixed. Open reduction and internal fixation should be the gold standard treatment for three-part fractures in younger and middle-aged patients. Four-part fractures should also be fixed in younger patients. Hemiarthroplasty results are less predictable as they are very dependent on tuberosity healing. While a reverse shoulder replacement may be considered in patients with severe comorbidities, patients always have better outcomes in the setting of an appropriately reduced and stably fixed proximal humerus fracture