Objectives

Favourable results for collarless polished tapered stems have been reported, and cement creep due to taper slip may be a contributing factor. However, the ideal cement thickness around polished stems remains unknown. We investigated the influence of cement thickness on stem subsidence and cement creep.

Dual mobility (DM) is an established bearing option in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The traditional mono-block DM designs have limited ability for additional fixation, whereas the modular DM designs allow additional screw fixation but limit internal diameter and have the potential to generate metal debris. We report the early results of a CoCrMo alloy mono-block implant manufactured by additive technology with a highly porous ingrowth surface to enhance primary fixation and osseointegration. Prospective follow-up of the Duplex. TM. implant first inserted in March 2016 enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure was all-cause revision and secondary outcomes dislocation, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Patients were risk stratified and all considered to be high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage using national database and via BC website. 159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a cemented Polished taper stem (PTS) had a Type B PPF rate of 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to conventional THA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool. We believe our results demonstrate that risk stratification successfully aids implant selection to prevent dislocation in high-risk patients. This novel design has provided excellent early results in a challenging cohort where individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. NJR data on DM has reported an increase in revision for PPF. A “perfect storm” maybe created using DM in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection

Introduction: C-stem is a triple taper polished femoral stem. The rationale for this design is to achieve an evenly distributed proximal loading of the cement mantle. This design is thought to enhance stability of the stem inside the mantle and lead to bone remodelling medially. There is to our knowledge no randomized trial comparing this stem to a well documented stem. We chose to compare it to the best documented stem in the Norwegian arthroplasty register, the Charnley monoblock. Methods: 70 patients scheduled for total hip replacement were randomized to either C-stem or Charnley monoblock. All received a 22 mm stainless steel head, OGGEE cup and Palacos Cement with Gentamycin. We used a transgluteal approach in all cases. Harris and Oxford hip scores were measured preoperatively and after two years. Standard X-rays were taken postoperatively and after two years. Radiostereometry (RSA) was done postoperatively and after 3,6,12 and 24 months. Results: There was no significant difference in Harris or Oxford hip scores after two years. RSA after two years: (table deleted). Discussion: Polished tapered stems are designed to sink inside the mantle. Our results confirm this theory for the C-stem. The subsidence is comparable to other collarless tapered stems with good long-term survival. For all other migrations/rotations the C-stem is as stable as the Charnley monoblock. This predicts good long-term results for this stem

This early study examines the influence of a wider shoulder on the 1 year migration of a cemented, polished, tapered stem, using RSA. Polished, tapered stems (PTS) have excellent 10 year survival rates. RSA studies have demonstrated that these devices subside about 1 mm / year. Small amounts of subsidence are beneficial in stabilising a stem. Stem rotation (measured as posterior head migration) within the cement mantle is probably a more important mechanism of failure than subsidence. Stems with a wider proximal portion are thought to better resist rotation. The CPS (Endoplus, UK) is such a device; here we compare its’ stability with that of the Exeter. 20 patients received the CPS-plus stem and underwent RSA examinations at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The Exeter 1 year migration data was used as a comparison. Both groups underwent a Hardinge approach with CMW3G cement. Both stems subsided about 1mm. The CPS showed less medio-lateral and A-P movement of the proximal stem than the Exeter over 1 year, as shown below:. The CPS internally rotates less than the Exeter, as demonstrated by the smaller amount of posterior head migration. It has a lateral flare of the shoulder; making its cross-section wider than the Exeter’s, this probably accounts for its’ greater resistance to rotation. The CPS also undergoes less medio-lateral proximal stem migration. Its’ lateral shoulder flare is probably responsible for this axial subsidence, as it prevents the shoulder from moving laterally whilst subsiding over the calcar. A PTS with a broad proximal section is more stable, this may confer an increased survival advantage

Cement is the commonest method used to fix femoral components in the UK. This is not surprising as in the UK cemented fixation has provided better results than cementless fixation. The results of cemented fixation do however depend on the design of the stem. Polished collarless tapered stems are now the most widely used stems in the UK. These stems subside within the cement mantle thus compressing the cement and cement-bone interface and preventing these from failing. They are thus very tolerant of poor quality cementing. As a result aseptic loosening is extraordinarily rare even in young active patients. Compared with cementless fixation cement is very forgiving. It can be used with ease whatever the anatomy of the proximal femur and whatever the bone quality. Correct leg length can also easily be achieved. Thigh pain does not occur and intra-operative fractures are very rare. The antibiotics in the cement decrease the incidence of infection. In addition cement provides an effective barrier to particulate debris and joint fluid under pressure. The only real disadvantage of cemented fixation is that it may take longer than cementless fixation. However this extra time spent is compensated by the cheaper implant costs

Introduction. Periprosthetic femur fractures are a serious complication after hip replacement surgery. In an aging population these fractures are becoming more and more common. Open reduction and plate osteosynthesis is one of the available treatment options. Objective. To investigate hip stem stability and cement mantle integrity under cyclic loading conditions after plate fixation with screws perforating the cement in the proximal fragment. Methods. Polished tapered hip stems were implanted in 16 biomechanical testing femora with Palacos cement (3rd generation technique) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 8 testing bones were osteotomised distal to the stem representing the fracture group (Vancouver Type C). The osteotomy was fixed with a polyaxial locking plate, the other 8 specimens served as a control group. The specimens were tested in a biaxial material testing machine under axial compression (including adduction and torsion moments) for 100.000 cycles at physiological loads. Stem subsidence was measured in 3 planes with a stereoscopic image correlation system during the tests. Subsequently the sliced and crack dyed specimens were investigated microscopically for cement cracks. Results. In the control group no specimen failed during testing. There were no statistically significant differences in stem subsidence along the longitudinal axis (control group mean ± SD −15.4 ± 12.2 μm, fracture group −14.1 ± 13.1 μm). In the fracture group two specimens fractured through the most proximal screw hole after 74.000 and 80.000 cycles. Overall 15 out of 36 screws in the proximal fragment had direct stem contact. No cement cracks were detected in the sliced specimens in both groups. Conclusion. Drilling the cement mantle and placing screws in the cement did not increase stem subsidence under cyclic loading. No cracks or cement mantle failure were observed. Large screw diameters proximally weaken the lateral cortex resulting in tension failure of the bone. Plate fixation of a periprosthetic femoral fracture with a stable, cemented prosthesis does not lead to early cement mantle failure