Aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for patients with a proximal humerus fracture, using time-driven activity based costing (TDABC), and to compare treatment costs with reimbursement under the Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs). Methods. TDABC analysis based on the principles outlined by Kaplan and a clinical pathway that has previously been validated for this institution was used. Staffing cost, consumables, implants, and overheads were updated to reflect 2019/2020 costs. This was compared with the HRG reimbursements. Results. The mean cost of a RSA is £7,007.46 (£6,130.67 to £8,824.67). Implants and staffing costs were the primary cost drivers, with implants (£2,824.80) making up 40% of the costs. Staffing costs made up £1,367.78 (19%) of overall costs. The total tariff, accounting for market force factors and high comorbidities, reimburses £4,629. If maximum cost and minimum reimbursement is applied the losses to the trust are £4,828.67. Conclusion. RSA may be an effective and appropriate surgical option in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures; however, a cost analysis at our centre has demonstrated the financial burden of this surgery. Given its increasing use in trauma, there is a need to work towards generating an HRG that adequately reimburses providers. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2020;1-12:731–736

Purpose. To evaluate the results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complicated proximal humerus fractures in old ages. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 13 cases who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture, fracture-dislocation and nonunions of the fractures. Mean age was 77(68–87)years old and mean follow-up period was 15.2(12–26)months. four part fractures of proximal humerus in 7 cases, fracture-dislocation in 3 cases, locked dislocation with greater tuberosity in 2 cases, nonunion with defiency of rotator cuff in 1 case were included. We evaluated mean ASES, mean UCLA, mean KSS, mean SST and mean range of motion(ROM). Results. Postoperative mean ASES was 59(13–98.5), mean UCLA was 21(12–34), mean KSS was 62(21–94), mean SST was 5(1–11). Postoperative mean ROM was 103°(30°–135°) in forward flexion, 93°(30°–135°) in abduction, 21°(0°–45°) in external rotation and L4 level in internal rotation. The complications were not shown in any cases except for resolved heterotropic ossification. 4 cases demonstrated bony unions on greater tuberosity and 4 cases showed scapular notching on last follow-up. Conclusions. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complicated proximal humerus fracture, nonunion of the fracture, or chronic locked dislocation seems to be a good treatment options. Regardless of bony union of the greater tuberosity, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the complicated proximal humerus fractures had a satisfied results

Aims. The optimal choice of management for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) has been increasingly discussed in the literature, and this work aimed to answer the following questions: 1) what are the incidence rates of PHF in the geriatric population in the USA; 2) what is the mortality rate after PHF in the elderly population, specifically for distinct treatment procedures; and 3) what factors influence the mortality rate?. Methods. PHFs occurring between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 were identified from the Medicare physician service records. Incidence rates were determined, mortality rates were calculated, and semiparametric Cox regression was applied, incorporating 23 demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic covariates, to compare the mortality risk between treatments. Results. From 2009 to 2019, the incidence decreased by 11.85% from 300.4 cases/100,000 enrollees to 266.3 cases/100,000 enrollees, although this was not statistically significant (z = -1.47, p = 0.142). In comparison to matched Medicare patients without a PHF, but of the same five-year age group and sex, a mean survival difference of -17.3% was observed. The one-year mortality rate was higher after nonoperative treatment with 16.4% compared to surgical treatment with 9.3% (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23 to 1.36; p < 0.001) and to shoulder arthroplasty with 7.4% (HR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.58; p < 0.001). Statistically significant mortality risk factors after operative treatment included age older than 75 years, male sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, a concomitant fracture, congestive heart failure, and osteoporotic fracture. Conclusion. Mortality risk factors for distinct treatment modes after PHF in elderly patients could be identified, which may guide clinical decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(2):103–112

Proximal humerus fracture dislocations are amongst the most severe proximal humerus injuries, presenting a challenging management problem. The aim of this study was to report on the long-term outcomes of the management of proximal humerus fracture dislocations. Patients with a proximal humerus fracture dislocation managed at a Level 1 trauma centre from January 2010 to December 2018 were included. Patients with an isolated tuberosity fracture dislocation or a pathological fracture were excluded. Outcome measures were the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), EQ-5D-5L, return to work, and radiological outcomes. Complications recorded included further surgery, loss of position/fixation, non-union/malunion, and avascular necrosis. A total of 69 patients were included with a proximal humerus fracture dislocation in the study period; 48 underwent surgical management and 21 were managed with closed reduction alone. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 59.7 (±20.4), and 54% were male. Overall patients reported a mean OSS of 39.8 (±10.3), a mean EQ-5D utility score of 0.73 (±0.20), and 78% were able to return to work at a median of 1.2 months. There was a high prevalence of complications in both patients managed operatively or with closed reduction (25% and 38% respectively). In patients undergoing surgical management, 21% required subsequent surgery. Patient reported outcome measures post proximal humerus fracture dislocations do not return to normal population levels. These injuries are associated with a high prevalence of complications regardless of management. Appropriate patient counselling should be undertaken before embarking on definitive management

There is very limited literature describing the outcomes of management for proximal humerus fractures with more than 100% displacement of the head and shaft fragments as a separate entity. This study aimed to compare operative and non-operative management of the translated proximal humerus fracture. A prospective cohort study was performed including patients managed at a Level 1 trauma centre between January 2010 to December 2018. Patients with 2, 3 and 4-part fractures were included based on the degree of translation of the shaft fragment (≥100%), resulting in no cortical contact between the head and shaft fragments. Outcome measures were the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), EQ-5D-5L, and radiological outcomes. Complications recorded included further surgery, loss of position/fixation, and non-union/malunion. Linear and logistic regression models were used to compare management options. There were 108 patients with a proximal humerus fracture with ≥100% translation; 76 underwent operative management and 32 were managed non-operatively with sling immobilisation. The mean (SD) age in the operative group was 54.3 (±20.2) and in the non-operative group was 73.3 (±15.3) (p<0.001). There was no association between OSS and management options (mean 38.5(±9.5) operative vs mean 41.3 (±8.5) non-operative, p=0.48). Operative management was associated with improved health status outcomes; EQ-5D utility score adjusted mean difference 0.16 (95%CI 0.04-0.27, p=0.008); EQ-5D VAS adjusted mean difference 19.2 (95%CI 5.2-33.2, p=0.008). Operative management was further associated with a lower odds of non-union (adjusted OR 0.30, 95%CI 0.09-0.97, p=0.04), malunion (adjusted OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.04-0.51, p=0.003) and complications (adjusted OR 0.07, 95%CI 0.02-0.32, p=0.001). Translated proximal humerus fractures with ≥100% displacement demonstrate improved health status and radiological outcomes following surgical fixation. Patients with this injury should be considered for operative intervention

Aims. The aim of this study was to explore why some calcar screws are malpositioned when a proximal humeral fracture is treated by internal fixation with a locking plate, and to identify risk factors for this phenomenon. Some suggestions can be made of ways to avoid this error. Methods. We retrospectively identified all proximal humeral fractures treated in our institution between October 2016 and October 2018 using the hospital information system. The patients’ medical and radiological data were collected, and we divided potential risk factors into two groups: preoperative factors and intraoperative factors. Preoperative factors included age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, proximal humeral bone mineral density, type of fracture, the condition of the medial hinge, and medial metaphyseal head extension. Intraoperative factors included the grade of surgeon, neck-shaft angle after reduction, humeral head height, restoration of medial support, and quality of reduction. Adjusted binary logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the multivariable model. Results. Data from 203 patients (63 males and 140 females) with a mean age of 62 years (22 to 89) were analyzed. In 49 fractures, the calcar screw was considered to be malpositioned; in 154 it was in the optimal position. The rate of malpositioning was therefore 24% (49/203). No preoperative risk factor was found for malpositioning of the calcar screws. Only the neck-shaft angle was found to be related to the risk of screw malpositioning in a multivariate model (with an AUC of 0.72). For the fractures in which the neck-shaft angle was reduced to between 130° and 150°, 91% (133/46) of calcar screws were in the optimal position. Conclusion. The neck-shaft angle is the key factor for the appropriate positioning of calcar screws when treating a proximal humeral fracture with a locking plate. We recommend reducing the angle to between 130° and 150°. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1629–1635

Objectives. The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) trial has recently demonstrated that surgery is non-superior to non-operative treatment in the management of displaced proximal humeral fractures. The objective of this study was to assess current surgical practice in the context of the PROFHER trial in terms of patient demographics, injury characteristics and the nature of the surgical treatment. Methods. A total of ten consecutive patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture from each of 11 United Kingdom hospitals were retrospectively identified over a 15 month period between January 2014 and March 2015. Data gathered for the 110 patients included patient demographics, injury characteristics, mode of surgical fixation, the grade of operating surgeon and the cost of the surgical implants. Results. A majority of the patients were female (66%, 73 of 110). The mean patient age was 62 years (range 18 to 89). A majority of patients met the inclusion criteria for the PROFHER trial (75%, 83 of 110). Plate fixation was the most common mode of surgery (68%, 75 patients), followed by intramedullary fixation (12%, 13 patients), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (10%, 11 patients) and hemiarthroplasty (7%, eight patients). The consultant was either the primary operating surgeon or supervising the operating surgeon in a large majority of cases (91%, 100 patients). Implant costs for plate fixation were significantly less than both hemiarthroplasty (p < 0.05) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (p < 0.0001). Implant costs for intramedullary fixation were significantly less than plate fixation (p < 0.01), hemiarthroplasty (p < 0.0001) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Our study has shown that the majority of a representative sample of patients currently undergoing surgical treatment for a proximal humeral fracture in these United Kingdom centres met the inclusion criteria for the PROFHER trial and that a proportion of these patients may, therefore, have been effectively managed non-operatively. Cite this article: Mr B. J. F. Dean. A review of current surgical practice in the operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures: Does the PROFHER trial demonstrate a need for change? Bone Joint Res 2016;5:178–184. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.55.2000596

Aims. Plating displaced proximal humeral fractures is associated with a high rate of screw perforation. Dynamization of the proximal screws might prevent these complications. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new gliding screw concept for plating proximal humeral fractures biomechanically. Methods. Eight pairs of three-part humeral fractures were randomly assigned for pairwise instrumentation using either a prototype gliding plate or a standard PHILOS plate, and four pairs were fixed using the gliding plate with bone cement augmentation of its proximal screws. The specimens were cyclically tested under progressively increasing loading until perforation of a screw. Telescoping of a screw, varus tilting and screw migration were recorded using optical motion tracking. Results. Mean initial stiffness (N/mm) was 581.3 (. sd. 239.7) for the gliding plate, 631.5 (. sd. 160.0) for the PHILOS and 440.2 (. sd. 97.6) for the gliding augmented plate without significant differences between the groups (p = 0.11). Mean varus tilting (°) after 7500 cycles was comparable between the gliding plate (2.6; . sd. 1.9), PHILOS (1.2; . sd. 0.6) and gliding augmented plate (1.7; . sd. 0.9) (p = 0.10). Similarly, mean screw migration(mm) after 7500 cycles was similar between the gliding plate (3.02; . sd. 2.85), PHILOS (1.30; . sd. 0.44) and gliding augmented plate (2.83; . sd. 1.18) (p = 0.13). Mean number of cycles until failure with 5° varus tilting were 12702 (. sd. 3687) for the gliding plate, 13948 (. sd. 1295) for PHILOS and 13189 (. sd. 2647) for the gliding augmented plate without significant differences between the groups (p = 0.66). Conclusion. Biomechanically, plate fixation using a new gliding screw technology did not show considerable advantages in comparison with fixation using a standard PHILOS plate. Based on the finding of telescoping of screws, however, it may represent a valid approach for further investigations into how to avoid the cut-out of screws. Cite this article: Y. P. Acklin, I. Zderic, J. A. Inzana, S. Grechenig, R. Schwyn, R. G. Richards, B. Gueorguiev. Biomechanical evaluation of a new gliding screw concept for the fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:422–429. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.76.BJR-2017-0356.R1

Complex proximal humerus fractures account for 10% of fractures in patients over 65 years of age. With the emergence of new implants, there is growing trend towards surgical management of these types of fractures, despite the lack of clinical evidence of its superiority over a conservative option. Orthopaedic surgeons' perception plays a large role in the surgical decision making for complex proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. No studies have been conducted to date to examine factors that influence the surgical decision-making in orthopaedic surgeons in regards to these types of fractures. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to orthopaedic surgeons. It included demographic questions as well as clinical vignettes assessing the risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons in different situations. Orthopaedic surgeons self-reported the proportion of proximal humerus fractures that were treated surgically in patients during the last year. Univariate analyzes were conducted to identify the factors that influenced the operation rates. A total of 127 orthopaedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. The response rate was 37%. The risk / benefit perception of surgical management varied according to the type of practice, year of training, operation rate as well as the ease of the surgeon in performing shoulder procedures (p < 0.05). According to the queried surgeons, the most important factors affecting their decision-making were patient's age, the type of fracture, co-morbidities, level of independence and potential for rehabilitation. The type of surgery proposed varied depending on the training and familiarity of the surgeon with the procedure. The risk / benefit perception of orthopaedic surgeons regarding surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients appears to vary widely. The decision to opt for surgical management is influenced by the surgeon's familiarity with the procedure, their year of training and their subspecialty. This study demonstrates the need to establish a decision-making tool to assist orthopaedic surgeons and patients with this clinical decision

Proximal humeral fractures occur frequently, with fixed angle locking plates often being used for their treatment. However, the failure rate of this fixation is high, ranging between 10 and 35%. Numerous variables are thought to affect the performance of the fixation used, including the length and configuration of screws used and the plate position. However, there is currently limited quantitative evidence to support concepts for optimal fixation. The variations in surgical techniques and human anatomy make biomechanical testing prohibitive for such investigations. Therefore, a finite element osteosynthesis test kit has been developed and validated - SystemFix. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of variations in screw length, configuration and plate position on predicted failure risk of PHILOS plate fixation for unstable proximal humerus fractures using the test kit. Twenty-six low-density humerus models were selected and osteotomized to create a malreduced unstable three-part fracture AO/OTA 11-B3.2 with medial comminution which was virtually fixed with the PHILOS plate. In turn, four different screw lengths, twelve different screw configurations and five plate positions were simulated. Each time, three physiological loading cases were modelled, with an established finite element analysis methodology utilized to evaluate average peri-screw bone strain, this measure has been previously demonstrated to predict experimental fatigue fixation failure. All three core variables lead to significant differences in peri-screw strain magnitudes, i.e. predicted failure risk. With screw length, shortening of 4 mm in all screw lengths (the distance of the screw tips to the joint surface increasing from 4 mm to 8 mm) significantly (p < 0 .001) increased the risk of failure. In the lowest density bone, every additional screw reduced failure risk compared to the four-screw construct, whereas in more dense bone, once the sixth screw was inserted, no further significant benefit was seen (p=0.40). Screw configurations not including calcar screws, also demonstrated significant (p < 0 .001) increased risk of failure. Finally, more proximal plate positioning, compared to the suggested operative technique, was associated with reduced the predicted failure risk, especially in constructs using calcar screws, and distal positioning increased failure risk. Optimal fixation constructs were found when placing screws 4 mm from the joint surface, in configurations including calcar screws, in plates located more proximally, as these factors were associated with the greatest reduction in predicted fixation failure in 3-part unstable proximal humeral fractures. These results may help to provide practical recommendations on the implant usage for improved primary implant stability and may lead to better healing outcomes for osteoporotic proximal fracture patients. Whilst prospective clinical confirmation is required, using this validated computational tool kit enables the discovery of findings otherwise hidden by the variation and prohibitive costs of appropriately powered biomechanical studies using human samples

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common, accounting for approximately 5% of all fractures. Approximately 30% require surgical intervention which can range from open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) to shoulder arthroplasty (including hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA)). The aim of this study was to assess trends in operative interventions for PHF in an Australian population. Data was retrospectively collected for patients diagnosed with a PHF and requiring surgical intervention between January 2001 and December 2020. Data for patients undergoing ORIF were extracted from the Medicare database, while data for patients receiving arthroplasty for PHF were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Across the study period, ORIF was the most common surgical procedure for management of PHFs. However, since 2019, RTSA has surpassed ORIF as the most common surgical procedure to treat PHFs, accounting for 51% of operations. While the number of RTSA procedures for PHF has increased, ORIF and shoulder hemiarthroplasty has significantly reduced since 2007 (p < 0.001). TSA has remained uncommon across the follow-up period, accounting for less than 1% of all operations. Patients younger than 65 years were more likely to receive ORIF, while those aged 65 years or greater were more likely to receive hemiarthroplasty or RTSA. While the number of ORIF procedures has increased during the period of interest, it has diminished as a proportion of overall procedure volume. RTSA is becoming increasingly popular, with decreasing utilization of hemiarthroplasty, and TSA for fracture remaining uncommon. These trends provide information that can be used to guide resource allocation and health provision in the future. A comparison to similar data from other nations would be useful

Purpose. The best care paradigm for the older patient with proximal humeral fracture/dislocation is typically hemiarthroplasty, yet post-operative instability and suboptimal functional outcomes are commonplace. The aim of this study was to compare innovative treatment strategies designed to improve outcomes including: hemiarthroplasty combined with capsulolabral repair versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods. After IRB approval, analysis was performed on patients treated with arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture/dislocation. Functional results and evidence of complication including instability (subluxation, dislocation) was determined. rTSA and hemiarthroplasty with capsulolabral repair were compared to hemiarthroplasy alone (control group). Results. 21 patients with proximal humeral fracture/dislocation (OTA 11-B3 & 11-C3) met the inclusion criteria and underwent hemiarthroplasty (n=8), hemiarthroplasty with capsulolabral repair (n=7), or rTSA (n=6). Patients undergoing rTSA (average age 70) were significantly older than patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty with capsulolabral repair (average age 59). Patients managed with rTSA had superior outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty with or without capsulolabral repair. Forward flexion following rTSA was 115 degrees compared to hemiarthroplasty (85 degrees) and hemiarthroplasty with capsulolabral repair (85 degrees). Forward flexion was equivalent for both hemiarthroplasty groups but greater variability was noted for hemiarthroplasty without capsulolabral repair compared to hemiarthroplasty with capsulolabral repair reflected by a standard deviation of 48 vs 13 respectively. Instability was noted radiographically in the hemiarthroplasty cohorts including 37.5% versus 14% of cases when capsulolabral repair was performed. No patients underwent revision surgery at current followup (4 yr Hemiarthroplasty, 3yr Hemiarthroplasty with capsulolabral repair, 1yr rTSA). Conclusion. The best treatment option for the older patient with proximal humeral fracture/dislocation is yet to be determined. The addition of capsulolabral repair to hemiarthroplasty is a novel approach to improve stability yet stiffness continues to plague the hemiarthroplasty technique. Reverse TSA improves functional outcomes for proximal humeral fracture/dislocation compared to hemiarthroplasty yet long term implant durability and lack of significant revision options should be considered when this treatment option is utilized

Purpose:. To evaluate the results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complicated proximal humerus fractures in old ages. Materials and Methods:. We retrospectively evaluated 13 cases who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture, fracture-dislocation and nonunions of the fractures. Mean age was 77 years old and mean follow-up period was 15.2(12–26) months. four part fractures of proximal humerus in 7 cases, fracture-dislocation in 3 cases, locked dislocation with greater tuberosity in 2 cases, nonunion with defiency of rotator cuff in 1 case were included (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3). We evaluated mean ASES, mean UCLA, mean KSS, mean SST and mean range of motion (ROM). Results:. Postoperative mean ASES was 59(13–98.5), mean UCLA was 21(12–34), mean KSS was 62(21–94), mean SST was 5(1–11). Postoperative mean ROM was 103° in forward flexion, 93° in abduction, 21° in external rotation and L4 level in internal rotation. 4 cases demonstrated bony unions on greater tuberosity and 4 cases showed scapular notching on last follow-up. Conclusion:. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complicated proximal humerus fracture, nonunion of the fracture, or chronic locked dislocation seems to be a good treatment options. Regardless of bony union of the greater tuberosity, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the complicated proximal humerus fractures had a satisfied results. Key words: Shoulder, Proximal humerus fracture, Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Introduction. The reliability of currently available proximal humeral fracture classi?cation systems has been shown to be poor, giving rise to the question whether a more objective measure entails improved predictability of surgical outcome. This study aims to apply a novel software system to predict the functional range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after proximal humeral fracture. Method. Using a validated system that simulates bone-determined range of motion of spheroidal joints such as the shoulder joint, we categorically analysed a consecutive series of 79 proximal humeral fractures. Morphological properties of the proximal humerus fractures were related to simulated bone-determined range of motion. Results. The interobserver variability of range of motion assessment using our system showed excellent agreement (0.798). Maximal glenohumeral abduction and forward ?exion of intra-articular fractures were 34.3±6.6 SE and 60.7±12.4 SE degrees. For fractures with a displaced greater tuberosity abduction was 75.0±5.9 SE and forward flexion was 118.2±4.9 SE degrees, whilst for fractures where both tuberosities had been displaced they were 60.0±10.9 SE and 69.6±13.4 SE degrees respectively. For non-intra articular fractures without displaced tuberosities movements were 89.3±3.3 SE and 122.6±3.4 SE degrees respectively. The head inclination angle was positively correlated with maximum abduction (0.362, p = 0.014). Offset was negatively correlated with maximum abduction, but not statistically signi?cant (0.834, p = 0.087). Conclusion. This study has demonstrated a novel and effective tool allowing the prediction of functional motion after proximal humeral fracture based on bone anatomy. The study demonstrates that intra-articular fractures generally have the worst prognosis with regards to bone-determined ROM. Fractures with displaced tuberosities show more motion limitations for abduction than for forward ?exion. A reduced head inclination angle is a strong predictor of limited bone-determined range of motion for all types of proximal humerus fractures

Various operative treatments have been proposed for proximal humeral fractures. The purpose of our study was to compare complications of plate versus nail for these proximal humeral fractures and to determine whether it is the implant or fracture and surgeon related factors which result in complications. We had 74 patients operated from March 2006 till June 2008 for displaced 3 (49pts) or 4 (25pts) part proximal humeral fractures. 43 had plating (PHILOS) and 31 had a humeral nail inserted. 57 patients were over 60 years at presentation while 17 were younger than 60. All patients were followed regularly radiologically. The functional outcomes were assessed by Quick DASH score and were comparable in both groups at 1 year postoperatively.18 of the 43 patients in the Plating group had a radiological complication with 9 cases of screw cut-out, 5 fractures maluniting and 1 nonunion. There was no case of osteonecrosis. In the nailing group, 13 patients had radiological complications, with 8 patients having varus malunion, 3 having proximal screw loosening and 1 having osteonecrosis apart from the clinical complications of impingement and rotator cuff problems. Given the similar complication rate and similar functional outcome achieved by both these techniques it is hard to determine if any one in particular is better than the other. The key determining factors for a proximal humeral fracture might actually be patient and surgeon related. It is important to achieve medial continuity and good initial reduction in these fractures to prevent them from collapsing into varus, especially with the nails. Also, patient age, osteoporosis and functional demand are factors determining success of surgery in these patients. We did not find the severity of the fracture to be a determining factor, maybe this was because the relative proportion of type 4 fractures in our series was less

Objectives. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta- analysis to investigate the effect of initial varus or valgus displacement of proximal humerus on the outcomes of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Methods. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing postoperative outcomes associated with initial varus versus initial valgus displacement of proximal humerus fracture. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. We identified two retrospective cohort studies and one retrospective analysis of a prospective database, enrolling a total of 243 patients with proximal humerus fractures. Our analysis showed that initial varus displacement was associated with a higher risk of overall complication (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.12–4.64, P = 0.02), screw penetration (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06–5.02, P = 0.04), varus displacement (RR 4.38, 95% CI 2.22–8.65, P < 0.0001), and reoperation (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.80–5.03, P < 0.0001) compared to valgus displacement. There was no significant difference in avascular necrosis (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.62–3.27, P = 0.40), infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46–4.84, P = 0.51), and non-union or malunion (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.37–5.04, P = 0.64). Conclusions. The best available evidence demonstrates that initial varus displacement of proximal humerus fractures is associated with higher risk of overall complication, screw penetration, varus displacement, and reoperation compared to initial valgus displacement. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Further high quality studies, that are adequately powered, are required to investigate the outcomes of initial varus and valgus displacement in specific fracture types

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to compare implant survivorship and functional outcomes in patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for acute proximal humeral fracture (PHF) with those undergoing elective RTSA in a population-based cohort study. Methods. Prospectively collected data from the New Zealand Joint Registry from 1999 to 2021 and identified 7,277 patients who underwent RTSA. Patients were categorized by pre-operative indication, including acute PHF (10.1%), rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) (41.9%), osteoarthritis (OA) (32.2%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (5.2%) and old traumatic sequelae (4.9%). The PHF group was compared with elective indications based on patient, implant, and operative characteristics, as well as post-operative outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS], and revision rate) at 6 months, 5 and 10 years after surgery. Survival and functional outcome analyses were adjusted by age, sex, ASA class and surgeon experience. Results. Implant survivorship at 10 years for RTSA for PHF was 97.3%, compared to 96.1%, 93.7%, 92.8% and 91.3% for OA, RCA, RA and traumatic sequelae, respectively. When compared with RTSA for PHF, the adjusted risk of revision was higher for traumatic sequelae (hazard ratio = 2.29; 95% CI:1.12–4.68, p=0.02) but not for other elective indications. At 6 months post-surgery, OSS were significantly lower for the PHF group compared to RCA, OA and RA groups (31.1±0.5 vs. 35.6±0.22, 37.7±0.25, 36.5±0.6, respectively, p<0.01), but not traumatic sequelae (31.7±0.7, p=0.43). At 5 years, OSS were only significantly lower for PHF compared to OA (37.4±0.9 vs 41.0±0.5, p<0.01), and at 10 years, there were no differences between groups. Discussion and Conclusion. RTSA for PHF demonstrated reliable long-term survivorship and functional outcomes compared to other elective indications. Despite lower functional outcomes in the early post-operative period for the acute PHF group, implant survivorship rates were similar to patients undergoing elective RTSA

Introduction: Proximal humeral fractures are common in the elderly osteoporotic population. Surgical management of such fractures with traditional internal fixation techniques is often challenging due to poor bone quality. Fixation with intramedullary devices theoretically offers better fixation, but with increased risk of shoulder pain and decreased range of motion. We undertook a study to compare outcome following fixation of such fractures with either an intramedullary nail (Polarus), standard Clover Leaf plate (AO), or Philos Locking plate (AO). Method: All patients admitted for surgical management of a proximal humeral fracture were entered into the study. 10 patients were treated using a Philos plate (Group 1), 5 with a Clover Leaf plate (Group 2), and 10 with a Polarus nail (Group 3). Post-operative assessment included radiological evaluation, clinical assessment of range of motion compared to the non-injured arm, assessment of pain severity (visual analogue scale), and functional assessment (DASH score). Non-parametric statistical techniques were used to analyse results. Results: There was no significant difference in age or sex distribution between the three groups. (Mean ages: Group 1: 54.6 yrs, Group 2: 45.2 yrs, Group 3: 59.7 yrs) Mean patient follow-up was 22 months (range 5–52 months). All patients in Group 1 and 2 went on to satisfactory radiological and clinical union. A higher complication rate was noted in the Polarus nail group, with 3 patients requiring removal of metal due to soft tissue or subacromial impingement. In addition one patient developed a non-union and required Philos plate fixation. All groups demonstrated a significant decrease in shoulder range of motion following injury, however this was less marked in Group 1 (Philos plate). In addition, patients in group 1 (Philos plate) demonstrated a more rapid recovery in terms of severity of pain, functional impairment and range of motion in the early postoperative phase. However, no significant long-term difference was noted in terms of post-operative pain or functional deficit between group 1 and 2. The poor outcome in group 3 was associated with a high incidence of shoulder pain and secondary procedures. Conclusion: Intramedullary fixation of proximal humeral fractures resulted in a high level of complications requiring secondary procedures in many cases. Our study supports the safety and efficacy of plate fixation techniques in the operative management of proximal humeral fractures

Complex proximal humerus fractures have been described as the unsolved fracture. Review of literature shows a variety of treatment methods and results. We present the results of a prospective study of 47 complex proximal humerus fractures treated by PHILOS (Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System) plate. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the PHILOS plate in the surgical treatment of Neer’s type 3 & 4 fractures. We operated upon 47 patients (mean age 56yrs) between March 2002 and January 2006 for fixation of 3 part (28 patients) and 4 part (19 patients) fractures at a level 1 trauma centre. An independent observer reviewed patients at 6 monthly intervals for clinical and radiological assessment. Outcome measures included DASH and Constant scores. 42 patients were available for follow up, which ranged from 12–66 (average 24.4) months. Recovery of movements, and relief in pain was satisfactory in most of the patients, but the strength of shoulder did not recover fully in any patient. There were two failures in our series, one due to breakage of plate and another due to non-union; both treated successfully by revision. 4 patients (8%) had radiological signs of avascular necrosis of humeral head but only 2 of them were symptomatic requiring further treatment. Pain due to impingement was noted in several patients leading to removal of plate (6 patients) and subacromial decompression (3 patients). We encountered the problem of cold welding and distortion of screw heads, while removing the plate. The broken plate was subjected to biomechanical and metallurgical analysis, which revealed that the plate is inherently weak at the site of failure. We concluded that in spite of the above-mentioned complications, the PHILOS plate is a reliable implant to fix 3 and 4 part proximal humeral fractures. We were particularly impressed with the satisfactory results of fixation in 4 part fractures. However, we are not convinced about its strength. The plate may cause impingement in some patients necessitating its removal later on, which itself may not be easy. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, level IV (case series)

Aims. Fixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures remains challenging even with state-of-the-art locking plates. Despite the demonstrated biomechanical benefit of screw tip augmentation with bone cement, the clinical findings have remained unclear, potentially as the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the biomechanical benefits of the augmentation options in a humeral locking plate using finite element analysis (FEA). Methods. A total of 64 cement augmentation configurations were analyzed using six screws of a locking plate to virtually fix unstable three-part fractures in 24 low-density proximal humerus models under three physiological loading cases (4,608 simulations). The biomechanical benefit of augmentation was evaluated through an established FEA methodology using the average peri-screw bone strain as a validated predictor of cyclic cut-out failure. Results. The biomechanical benefit was already significant with a single cemented screw and increased with the number of augmented screws, but the configuration was highly influential. The best two-screw (mean 23%, SD 3% reduction) and the worst four-screw (mean 22%, SD 5%) combinations performed similarly. The largest benefits were achieved with augmenting screws purchasing into the calcar and having posteriorly located tips. Local bone mineral density was not directly related to the improvement. Conclusion. The number and configuration of cemented screws strongly determined how augmentation can alleviate the predicted risk of cut-out failure. Screws purchasing in the calcar and posterior humeral head regions may be prioritized. Although requiring clinical corroborations, these findings may explain the controversial results of previous clinical studies not controlling the choices of screw augmentation