Displaced acetabular fractures in the older patient present significant treatment challenges. There is evidence the morbidity and mortality associated is similar to the fractured neck of femur cohort. Despite growing literature, there remains significant controversy regarding treatment algorithms; varying between conservative management, to fracture fixation and finally surgical fixation and simultaneous THA to allow immediate full weight bearing. £250k NIHR, Research for Patient Benefit (Ref: PB-PG-0815-20054). Trial ethical approval (17/EE/0271). After national consultation, 3 arms included; conservative management, fracture fixation and simultaneous fracture fixation with THA. Statistical analysis required minimum 12 patients/3 arms to show feasibility, with an optimum 20/arm. Inclusion criteria; patients >60 years & displaced acetabular fracture. Exclusion criteria: open fracture, THA in situ, pre-injury immobility, polytrauma. Primary outcome measure - ability recruit & EQ-5D-5L at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures (9 months); OHS, Disability Rating Index, radiographs, perioperative physiological variables including surgery duration, blood loss, complications and health economics. 11 UK level 1 major trauma centres enrolled into the trial, commenced December 2017. Failure surgical equipoise was identified as an issue regarding recruitment. Full trial recruitment (60 patients) achieved; 333 patients screened. 66% male, median age 76 (range 63–93), median BMI 25 (range 18–37), 87% full mental capacity, 77% admitted from own home. 75% fall from standing height. 60% fractures; anterior column posterior hemi-transverse. Trial feasibility confirmed December 2020. Presented data- secondary outcomes that are statistically significant in improvement from baseline for only the fix and replace arm, with acceptable trial complications. Issues are highlighted with conservative management in this patient cohort. Our unique
Background The three professional groups of chiropractic, osteopathy and musculoskeletal physiotherapy are involved in the management of 15–20% of people with low back pain (LBP) in the UK (CSAG 1994). Exploratory and descriptive research suggests that the management of non-specific low back pain (LBP) by some members of these groups does not follow best available evidence (RCGP 1999). Purpose To test the short-term effectiveness (at 6 months) of a directly-posted, contextualised, printed educational package about the evidence-based management of acute back pain on changing UK chiropractors’, osteopaths’ and musculoskeletal physiotherapists’:. 1) beliefs and attitudes about LBP. 2) reported practice (using a clinical vignette). Methods A prospective, pragmatic randomised trial was designed to test the effectiveness of the printed educational package versus a no-intervention control. MREC approval was gained and a questionnaire was developed and piloted (n=150). Information was gathered on practitioners’ demographics, their beliefs about LBP (using the HC-PAIRS, Rainville et al 1995) and reported practice based on a vignette of a patient with non-specific LBP (adapted from Bombardier et al 1995, Buchbinder 2001). A total of 3602 questionnaires were posted to simple random samples of UK registered chiropractors (n=611), osteopaths (n=1367) and physiotherapists (n=1624). Intervention packages were sent to consenting practitioners in March 2004, and the follow-up is planned for September 2004. Results Good response rates to the baseline questionnaire were obtained, and most respondents were willing to participate in the
Introduction. The number of revisions of total knee replacements (TKR) increases annually. Because of reduced bone stock, stable fixation of the implant is important. The femoral and tibial components are usually cemented whereas stems can be placed either cemented or press-fit (hybrid construct). To assess the stability of revision TKR with either cemented or hybrid places implants a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was executed, by using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The short-term results of this
Introduction and Aims A randomised controlled trial (RCT) and a multi-centre unilateral cohort study were performed as part of the stepwise introduction of a new mobile bearing knee. The aim was to ensure that outcome for the new device was at least as good as that for an established fixed bearing device. This paper presents three year follow up of the published one year results. Instability and prevalence of “clicking” from the joint were examined in detail. Method 1. A multi-centre
This project highlights the red flags in postoperative rehabilitation of total ankle replacement (TAR) patients managed with two different postoperative rehab regimes. 20 TAR patients were recruited for a pilot
Aims. This study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic, multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an informal caregiver training programme to support the recovery of people following hip fracture surgery. Methods. This will be a mixed-methods feasibility
Joint registries suggest a downward trend in the use of uncemented Total Knee Replacements (TKR) since 2003, largely related to reports of early failures of uncemented tibial and patella components. Advancements in uncemented design such as trabecular metal may improve outcomes, but there is a scarcity of high-quality data from randomised trials. 319 patients <75 years of age were randomised to either cemented or uncemented TKR implanted using computer navigation. Patellae were resurfaced in all patients. Patient outcome scores, re-operations and radiographic analysis of radiolucent lines were compared. Two year follow up was available for 287 patients (144 cemented vs 143 uncemented). There was no difference in operative time between groups, 73.7 v 71.1 mins (p= 0.08). There were no statistical differences in outcome scores at 2 years, Oxford knee score 42.5 vs 41.8 (p=0.35), International Knee Society 84.6 vs 84.0 (p=0.76), Forgotten Joint Score 66.7 vs 66.4 (p=0.91). There were two revisions, both for infection one in each group (0.33%). 13 cemented and 8 uncemented knees underwent re-operation, the majority of these being manipulation under anaesthetic (85.7%), with no difference (8.3% vs 5.3%, 95% CI -2.81% to 8.89%, p = 0.31). No difference was found in radiographic analysis at 2 years, 1 lucent line was seen in the cemented group and 3 in the uncemented group (0.67% v 2.09%, 95%CI -4.1% to 1.24%, p = 0.29). We found no difference in clinical or radiographic outcomes between cemented and uncemented TKR including routine patella resurfacing at two years. Early results suggest there is no difference between cemented and uncemented TKR at 2 years with reference to survivorship, patient outcomes and radiological parameters.
We have performed an
Aim. The purpose of this study was to perform a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the >20 year outcomes of cemented versus cementless Mallory Head total hip replacements (THRs). Methods. Two hundred and fifty patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of their hip, a mean age of 64 years and 48% of whom were female were randomised to receive either a cemented (n=124) or cementless (n=126) THR. Results. At >20 years follow-up, the cementless Mallory Head THR outperformed its cemented counterpart in terms of overall Kaplan Meier survivorship (p=0.01), socket survivorship (p=0.009) and stem survivorship (p< 0.0001). Age significantly affected acetabular socket revision rates for both cementless (>65 - 12% versus < 65 - 36%, p=0.003) and cemented (>65 - 19% versus < 65 - 55%, p< 0.0001) sockets. Male gender adversely affected cementless (males - 31% versus females - 12%, p=0.01), but not cemented (males - 35% versus females - 36%, p=1.000) socket survivorships. For the femoral stems, age did not affect cementless stem survivorship (>65 - 0% versus < 65 - 2%, p=0.465), but did so with cemented stems (>65 - 16% versus < 65 - 33%, p=0.001). Gender did not influence cementless or cemented stem survivorships. Conclusion. This
Aims. Distal third clavicle (DTC) fractures are increasing in incidence. Due to their instability and nonunion risk, they prove difficult to treat. Several different operative options for DTC fixation are reported but current evidence suggests variability in operative fixation. Given the lack of consensus, our objective was to determine the current epidemiological trends in DTC as well as their management within the UK. Methods. A multicentre retrospective cohort collaborative study was conducted. All patients over the age of 18 with an isolated DTC fracture in 2019 were included. Demographic variables were recorded: age; sex; side of injury; mechanism of injury; modified Neer classification grading; operative technique; fracture union; complications; and subsequent procedures. Baseline characteristics were described for demographic variables. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Results. A total of 859 patients from 18 different NHS trusts (15 trauma units and three major trauma centres) were included. The mean age was 57 years (18 to 99). Overall, 56% of patients (n = 481) were male. The most common mechanisms of injury were simple fall (57%; n = 487) and high-energy fall (29%; n = 248); 87% (n = 748) were treated conservatively and 54% (n = 463) were Neer type I fractures. Overall, 32% of fractures (n = 275) were type II (22% type IIa (n = 192); 10% type IIb (n = 83)). With regards to operative management, 89% of patients (n = 748) who underwent an operation were under the age of 60. The main fixation methods were: hook plate (n = 47); locking plate (n = 34); tightrope (n = 5); and locking plate and tight rope (n = 7). Conclusion. Our study is the largest epidemiological review of DTC fractures in the UK. It is also the first to review the practice of DTC fixation. Most fractures are being treated nonoperatively. However, younger patients, suffering a higher-energy mechanism of injury, are more likely to undergo surgery. Hook plates are the predominantly used fixation method followed by locking plate. The literature is sparse on the best method of fixation for optimal outcomes for these patients. To answer this, a pragmatic
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective blinded randomized control trial was to compare the stem migration of two cemented stem designs using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). This was essentially a safety study in which our hypothesis was that the newer design (CPCS, Smith and Nephew Inc) would demonstrate similar micro-motion to the well-established Exeter (Stryker) design. Method: Thirty patients were consented and enrolled into a blinded
Purpose: A ceramic head coupled to a metal liner is a proposed new alternate bearing in THA. The authors participated in an FDA approved multicentre prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing ceramic-on-metal (CoM) to metal-on-metal (MoM) in patients receiving a THA. Method: 390 patients received the same acetabular component and metal insert. 194 patients received a delta ceramic head (CoM) and 196 received a metal head (MoM). Metal ions were evaluated in 72 patients (36-CoM, 36-MoM). Harris Hip scores, radiographs, and metal ion levels (cobalt, chromium and titanium in serum, erythrocytes and urine) were evaluated pre-operatively and at three, 12 and 24 months. Results: No patients were lost to follow-up. There were no differences between groups’ baseline demographics and clinical scores. At two years there were no differences in Harris Hip scores, radiographs, adverse events or postoperative complications. Both groups had overall very low median metal ion profiles with no statistically significant differences. 24 month MoM vs CoM; Serum cobalt ( g/L), mean: 1.2(+/−0.5) vs 1.1(+/−0.3), median: 0.66(range: 0.2–5.6) vs 1.0 (range: 0.3–2.7); Serum chromium ( g/L), mean: 1.1(+/−0.5) vs 1.4(+/−0.4), median: 0.86(range: 0.3–6.9) vs 1.2(range: 0.3–4.9). Urine cobalt and urine chromium ( g/day) demonstrated similar trends to serum ion levels. Conclusion: While CoM is a new bearing surface in North America and not currently FDA or HPB approved, it has been in clinical use globally since 2006. Results of this non-inferiority
Purpose: Porous metal technology may have significant impacts on implant fixation and long-term survival due to their high co-efficient of friction and similarity to trabecular bone in morphology and mechanical behaviour. While promising, the in vivo mechanical behaviour and micromotion at the interface has not previously been reported on. We report on the 2-year results of an
Introduction. Metal on metal articulations produce chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) debris, particularly when the articulations are worn in. High levels in the peripheral blood are indicative of excess wear and may cause adverse effects. The present
Background. Balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a minimally invasive cementing procedure, occasionally used in patients with painful vertebral compression fractures (VCF). In this multicenter Swedish
The use of wound drains in arthroplasty patients is controversial. Previous work including a meta analysis looking at closed drainage systems has shown no benefit in their use. It is postulated that retransfusion drains may offer an advantage over closed drains and cut allogenic transfusion requirements and aid wound healing. This study was designed to assess the use of retransfusion drains in hip and knee replacement patients and prove the null hypothesis that there is no difference in post op haemaglobin levels or transfusion with their use. Following an initial pilot audit of blood drainage in such patients we designed a protocol for a prospective trial. In a prospective randomised controlled study we evaluated the use of retransfusion drains in primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Eighty patients were randomised to removal of the drain at six or twenty-four hours post op, to assess the most efficient and beneficial use of such drains. The rate of blood drainage, post-operative haemaglobin (Hb) levels, blood transfusion, hospital stay, complications and rehabilitation observed. The two groups were comparable, have a follow up of two years and all attempts to control variables were made. The drop in haemaglobin, hospital stay, complications and rehabilitation between both groups revealed no significant difference in all respects. Wound healing appeared better in six-hour group for hip and knee patients. There is no effect of type of joint or age on the drop in Hb. The TKR patients drained sig. more blood than the THR patients. The rate of blood loss is discussed. The amount of blood drained that was retransfused was 94% efficient. The allogenic transfusion rates were higher in the six-hour knee group. Three patients required post operative antibiotic but at latest follow up all patients were reported as having no problems and no evidence of infection. This study concludes that retransfusion drains offer no advantage in the arthroplasty patients’ care.
This paper describes the methods applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty among hip fracture patients in the World Hip Trauma Evaluation Five (WHiTE5) trial. A within-trial cost-utility analysis (CUA) will be conducted at four months postinjury from a health system (National Health Service and personal social services) perspective. Resource use pertaining to healthcare utilization (i.e. inpatient care, physiotherapy, social care, and home adaptations), and utility measures (quality-adjusted life years) will be collected at one and four months (primary outcome endpoint) postinjury; only treatment of complications will be captured at 12 months. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results.Aim
Methods
The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of shock-wave therapy for chronic Achilles pain. Forty-nine patients with Achilles tendon pain for a minimum of 4 months were included in the study. Patients were randomised to either shockwave therapy (n=27) or placebo control (n=22). The treatment group were given 2000 shocks at up to 1500 mJ/mm2 per shock. The control (sham) treatment was applied using the same parametres but the shockwaves were dispersed before they reached the patient. Each patient was treated once a month over 3 months. The primary outcome measure was pain on walking indicated on a 100mm visual analogue score (VAS) at 3 months. The walking pain scores were very similar at baseline between the two groups. In the treatment group the mean (standard deviation) was 55.5 mm (30.6) and in the control group 55.6mm (26.5). By 3 months, the pain scores had reduced in both groups to a mean (standard deviation) of 34.5 mm (34.2) and 50.3 mm (36.3). Although lower in the treatment group this difference was not statistically significant at the 5% level (t-test, p=0.127, 95% CI : −4.7 to 36.2). Two elderly patients in the treatment group sustained spontaneous rupture of the tendon after falls during the course of the trial. The results of this trial provided no evidence for the use of shockwave therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy. However, a treatment effect cannot be ruled out since the 95% confidence interval included a potential clinically relevant difference. The two cases of rupture suggest extreme caution in treating the elderly.
Acute Achilles tendon pain is a common clinical entity, particularly in sportsmen and women. Fortunately, the majority of such pain is self limiting. However, there are a significant number of people for whom the pain becomes chronic and debilitating. A recent Cochrane review found that there was no randomised controlled evidence of an effective treatment for chronic Achilles pain. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of shockwave therapy in a double-blind randomised controlled trial. The study has the approval of Local Research Ethics Committees. Forty nine patients with Achilles tendon pain for a minimum of 4 months were included in the study. Patients were randomised to either shockwave therapy (n=27) or sham dose control therapy (n=22). Ultrasound was used to focus the shocks onto the affected area of tendon. The treatment group were given 2000 shocks at upto 1500mJ per shock, titrated to the patients pain tolerance. The control (sham) treatment was applied using the same parametres but with bubble-wrap interposition between the shockwave generator and the Achilles, to disperse the shockwaves. Each patient was treated once a month over 3 months. Primary outcome measure was pain on walking indicated on a 100mm visual analogue score (VAS) at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures included clinical and patient centred questionnaire scores. . An intention-to-treat approach was used for the analysis. Where patients had missing pain scores at 3 month follow-up, the last available pain score was carried forward. The walking pain scores were very similar at baseline between the two groups. In the treatment group the mean (standard deviation) was 55.5mm (30.6) and in the control group 55.6mm (26.5). By 3 months, the pain scores had reduced in both groups to a mean (standard deviation) of 34.5 mm (34.2) and 50.3 mm (36.3). Although lower in the treatment group this difference was not statistically significant at the 5% level (t-test, p = 0.127, 95% C.I. : −4.7 to 36.2). No statistically significant differences were found with respect to any of the other clinical variables. Two elderly patients in the treatment group sustained spontaneous rupture of the tendon after falls, during the course of the trial. The results of this trial provided no evidence for the use of shockwave therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy. However, a treatment effect cannot be ruled out since the 95% confidence interval was wide and included a potential clinically relevant difference. The 2 cases of rupture suggest extreme caution in treating the elderly.
Intra-articular (IA) injection may be used when treating hip osteoarthritis (OA). Common injections include steroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), local anaesthetic, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Network meta-analysis allows for comparisons between two or more treatment groups and uses direct and indirect comparisons between interventions. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of various IA injections used in the management of hip OA with a follow-up of up to six months. This systematic review and network meta-analysis used a Bayesian random-effects model to evaluate the direct and indirect comparisons among all treatment options. PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrial.gov, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluate the efficacy of HA, PRP, local anaesthetic, steroid, steroid+anaesthetic, HA+PRP, and physiological saline injection as a placebo, for patients with hip OA were included.Aims
Methods