The aim was to examine the descriptive epidemiology of
Purpose of Study:. In situ fixation with cannulated screws, is the most common surgical management of
The risk of AVN is high in Unstable
Introduction and Objective.
Aims: In order to assess the potential pathologic inßuence of any Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) disturbances on the development of
Introduction:
Purpose. This report compares midterm results of open neck osteoplasty +
neck osteotomy vs arthroscopic osteoplasty for severe
Despite recent advances in the management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), controversy remains about the treatment of choice for unstable slips. Surgical dislocation and open reduction has the advantage of identifying and preserving the blood supply of femoral head thereby potentially reducing the risk of avascular necrosis, (AVN). There is large variation in the literature from several small series about reported AVN rates ranging from two to 66% for unstable SCFE treated with surgical dislocation. The aim of our study was to analyze our experience with acute open reduction and internal fixation of unstable acute and unstable acute on chronic slips using the technique of surgical dislocation described by Professor Reinhold Ganz. A retrospective review of 11 patients (12 hips) treated by surgical dislocation, reduction and pinning as the primary procedure for unstable acute and unstable acute on chronic SCFE in a tertiary referral children's hospital was undertaken. This represents the entire series treated in this manner from September 2007 to January 2018. These procedures were performed by a team of Orthopaedic surgeons with significant experience performing surgical dislocation of the hip including patients with chronic SCFE, Perthes' disease, impingement and acetabular fractures. Demographic data, intraoperative records, postoperative notes and radiographs including details of subsequent surgery were reviewed. There were seven boys and four girls with mean age of 13.4 years, range 11 to 15 years at the time of surgical dislocation. Out of 12 hips, two had acute unstable slip while the remaining 10 had acute on chronic unstable slip. Six patients had good or excellent results. The remaining six patients developed AVN of which three patients had total hip replacement at six months, 17 months and 18 months following primary procedure. Seven patients required more than one operation. Three patients lost their correction and required re fixation despite surgical dislocation, reduction and fixation being their primary procedure. This series demonstrates a high percentage of AVN (50%) in severe unstable SCFE treated with surgical dislocation despite careful attention to retinacular flap development and intra operative doppler studies. This is in direct contrast to our experience with subcapital reorientation with surgical dislocation in stable slips where excellent results were achieved with a low rate of AVN. Pre-operative imaging with MRI and perfusion studies may identify where ischemia has occurred and might influence operative treatment. Based on our results, we do not recommend routine use of surgical dislocation in unstable SCFE. This technique requires further scrutiny to define the operative indications in unstable SCFE.
Our objective is to show the results of the unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis treatment with reduction and threaded screw fixation. A retrospective analysis of 21 patients (13 boys and 8 girls) with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis was performed between 1993 and 1998. The right hip was involved in 13 patients and the left hip in 8. The patients presented acute pain and functional difficulties. The diagnoses were based on the clinical presentation, neutral and Lowestein hip x-rays. The treatment consisted on gentle manipulative reduction of the unstable slip (flexion and internal rotation), threaded cannulated screw fixation on orthopaedic table and image intensifier control. Results showed 2 avascular necrosis, 2 bone shortening, 3 limited range of motion. The rest showed satisfactory clinical results in the short term.
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is associated with a spectrum of proximal femoral deformity and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Little attention has been given, however, to the possible effect of SCFE on remaining hip growth. Our observation that some acetabula in hips with SCFE have various dysmorphology led us to evaluate the growth of the hip in our patients with SCFE. We performed an IRB-approved retrospective study of our intramural SCFE database which identified 108 hips with unilateral SCFE, at least 2 years of radiographic followup, and closure of triradiate cartilage, greater trochanter and proximal femoral physis. The contralateral non-SCFE hip was used as control. Average age at presentation was 12.3 y. 49 patients were male, 59 female. Statistically significant differences were noted between SCFE and control hip both at both presentation and last followup(FU): Mean LCEA lower in SCFE hip at presentation by 0.97 degree; increasing to 4.36 degrees at last FU(p<0.0001). No difference noted in mean Tonnis roof angle at presentation, but at last FU SCFE hips had mean roof angle difference of 3.2 degrees higher than control(p<.0001). In some of our SCFE patients, acetabular deformity has impacted treatment. Ongoing studies may clarify risk factors for the development of problematic acetabular deformity associated with SCFE and perhaps allow prevention of secondary acetabular deformity.
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is the most common hip disorder in children 9–15 years old. The epidemiology for SCFE in the total population of Sweden has not yet been described. In a prospective cohort study, we analysed pre- and postoperative radiographs and medical records for all children treated for SCFE in Sweden 2007–2013, and noted demographic data, severity of slip, and surgical procedures performed.Purpose
Methods
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is an important orthopaedic problem of early adolescence. Many hypotheses about its etiology have been proposed; still the underlying mechanisms are not clearly understood. The aim of our paper is to examine radiographic characteristics of hips at risk for slipped capital epiphysis. Two groups of hips were compared: a group of 100 asymptomatic hips contralateral to the slipped ones and a group of 70 age- and gender-matched healthy hips. The hips contralateral to the slipped ones were assumed to have identical morphology to the preslip-page morphology of the slipped hips. In each hip the following radiographic parameters were measured: the inter-hip distance, the femoral neck length/width, the pelvic height, the pelvic width, the femoral head radius, the coordinates of the abductor muscles trochanteric attachment, the inclination of the femoral epiphyseal growth plate, the femoral neck-shaft angle and the Wiberg center-edge angle. Subjects with hips at risk for slipping had significantly higher body weight (590 vs. 500 N; p <
0.001), larger diameter of the femoral neck (38.6 vs 37.3 mm; p = 0.027), higher (138.9 vs. 134.6 mm; p = 0.022) and wider pelvis (53.8 vs. 48.7 mm; p <
0.001) and more laterally placed abductor muscles trochanteric attachment. There were no significant differences in the inter-hip distance, the femoral head radius, the femoral neck length and the femoral neck-shaft angle angle. Hips contralateral to the slipped ones had a more vertically inclined physeal angle (55.4 vs. 63.2 degrees; p <
0.001) in comparison to the healthy hips. The Wiberg centre-edge angle of the hips contralateral to the slipped ones was on average 7% larger from the healthy group (34.7 vs. 32.2 degrees; p = 0.003). Children with hips at risk for slipping had larger pelvices and femora with more vertically inclined femoral epiphyseal growth plate. In addition, one cannot overlook the significant difference in the body weight between the age- and gender-matched groups of our study, confirming previous findings on the role of body weight in SCFE. It is therefore possible that anatomical changes may be a downstream effect of bone remodelling caused by altered loading during growth and development. This may suggest that the predisposition of the hip to slipping occurs earlier in the patient’s lifetime and that targeted radiographic examinations in obese individuals could reveal changes in pelvic geometry even before adolescence. Considering the high rates of bilateral involvement, our results could be used to predict the need for preventive fixation of asymptomatic hips after the capital femoral epiphysis has slipped in the contralateral hip.
A slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) can be fixed in-situ with K-wires or screws. For the latter is said that one disadvantage is the lack of femoral neck growth. Assumed reasons for this is despite an injury of the physis by the often too long thread the missing lubrication of the screw in the bone. The following study evaluates the amount of remaining bony growth and method-depending complications in screw fixation of SCFE.
In 20 patients we tried to remove the screws after completed growth. This was possible in 30% minimal invasively and in 30% with open surgery. In 40% parts of the screws or even the whole screw remained in situ. Time of surgery for bilateral screw pinning was 51 minutes, for removal 91 minutes in average (34–278).
Stickler’s syndrome, also called Hereditary Progressive Arthro-Ophthalmopathy, is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder with strong expressivity, characterised by ocular, orofacial, skeletal, cardiac, and auditory features. We describe a case of valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis in a 13 year-old boy with Stickler’s syndrome. He presented at routine rheumatology clinic follow-up with a 1-month history of progressively worsening right hip pain, which radiated to the knee. He underwent insitu cannulated screw fixation of the right slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Joint pains are a common manifestation in Stickler’s syndrome and this might delay the diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a rare entity. Obesity and the increased femoral anteversion are predisposing factors. Insitu fixation with a single cannulated screw is the treatment of choice.
Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in cases of unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remains contentious. Our senior author reported a 10 year series in 2006 that identified a rate of subsequent contralateral slip of 25percnt; when prophylactic fixation was not performed. This led to a change in local practice and employment of prophylactic fixation as standard. We report the 10 year outcomes following this change in practice. A prospective study of all patients who presented with diagnosis of SCFE between 2004 and 2014 in our region. Intra-operative complication and post-operative complication were the primary outcomes. 31 patients presented during the study period: 16 male patients and 15 female patients. The mean age was 12.16 (8–16, SD 2.07). 25 patients had stable SCFE and 5 had unstable SCFE. Stability was uncertain in 1 patient. 25 patients had unilateral SCFE and 6 had bilateral SCFE. 24 patients who had unilateral SUFE had contralateral pinning performed. 1 unilateral SCFE did not have contralateral pinning performed as there was partial fusion of physis on contralateral side. In the hips fixed prophylactically there was 1 cases of transient intraoperative screw penetration into the joint and 1 case of minor wound dehiscence. There were no cases or chondrolysis or AVN. There were no further contralateral slips. This change in practice has been adopted with minimal complication. The fixation of the contralateral side is not without risk but by adopting this model the risk of subsequent slip has been reduced from 25percnt; to 0percnt;.
To identify the incidence of sequential slip of the unaffected hips in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. A retrospective review of all unilateral SCFE treated during 1998 to 2012 was undertaken. The study compares the incidence of sequential slip of the initially unaffected hip in patients managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. The study also reports the incidence avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and metal-work related problem in this group of patients. All patients included in this current work have at least 12 months of follow-up from the index slip. A total of 44 cases had prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip (mean age 12.6 years,) and 36 patients managed with regular observation (mean age 13.4 years). Sequential slip of the unaffected hip was noted in a total of 10 patients (28 %) managed with regular observation and only in 1 patient (2%) managed with prophylactic fixation. A Fishers exact test showed significantly high incidence of sequential slip in unaffected hips when managed by regular observation (p-value-0.002). There is no evidence of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in the unaffected hip in both groups, 3 patients had metalwork related problem and one had superficial wound infection in prophylactic fixation group. Simultaneous prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hips significantly reduces the incidence of sequential slip. This is a relatively safe procedure and should be advocated in all cases of unilateral SCFE to avoid potential complications and preserve function of the unaffected hip.
Debate remains over the optimal treatment for severe unstable SCFE. AVN is the principle problem; current thinking suggests this can be minimized by emergent reduction and fixation within 24 hours. If emergent treatment is not possible, open osteotomy with a variable delay of 10–21 days has been advocated. We present our experience of delayed intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy (ICO) SCFE cases were identified through ICD-10 coding and theatre records. Unstable slips were identified and reviewed retrospectively. When ICO was performed, the hip was accessed via anterior approach without hip dislocation. A cuneiform shortening osteotomy of the neck with physeal excision was undertaken. The epiphysis was carefully reduced and stabilized with a single screw.Aim
Methods
Twenty-three patients with thirty hips of slipped capital femoral epiphysis were treated in our department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore between 1997 and 2005. Except one patient lost of follow-up, twenty-four SCFEs with more than 2 years (25 to 73 months, average 38.5 months) follow-up were reviewed. This study is to evaluate the effectiveness and outcome of our protocol: Russell traction followed by gentle manipulative reduction with a single screw fixation & spica cast immobilization (for acute-on-chronic cases with unstable and reducible SCFE). In this series, there were 13 boys & 5 girls, mean age 12 year old ranging from 10 to 14 years. Among them 7 were Chinese, 6 Malays & 5 Indians. There were 12 unilateral cases (8 on the left & 4 right, 67%) & 6 bilateral cases (33%), including 2 patients found contralateral SCFE subsequently 1 year postoperatively. Acute-on-chronic SCFE were 16 & chronic SCFE 8. 16 were Grate I & 8 Grate II. Russell traction was on preoperatively with an average of 6 days. Gentle manipulative reduction under general anesthesia was performed in 20 SCFEs (12 GI & 8 GII) and 17 of them were successful. Fixation with a single screw was used for all cases except one hip with 2 screws. Average follow-up was 38.5 months. Good results achieved. All patient were symptom free with good function. No complications of AVN, chondrolysis, screw loosening and reslipping of the affective hips. Our protocol of management for SCFE has been largely successful in term of manipulative reduction and fixation.