Aims. The primary aim of this study was to determine the rates of return to work (RTW) and sport (RTS) following a humeral shaft fracture. The secondary aim was to identify factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Methods. From 2008 to 2017, all patients with a humeral diaphyseal fracture were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were recorded. Details of pre-injury employment, sporting participation, and levels of return post-injury were obtained via postal questionnaire. The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Scale was used to quantify physical activity among active patients. Regression was used to determine factors independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Results. The Work Group comprised 177 patients in employment prior to injury (mean age 47 years (17 to 78); 51% female (n = 90)). Mean follow-up was 5.8 years (1.3 to 11). Overall, 85% (n = 151) returned to work at a mean of 14 weeks post-injury (0 to 104), but only 60% (n = 106) returned full-time to their previous employment. Proximal-third fractures (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 14.2); p = 0.029) were independently associated with failure to RTW. The Sport Group comprised 182 patients involved in sport prior to injury (mean age 52 years (18 to 85); 57% female (n = 104)). Mean follow-up was 5.4 years (1.3 to 11). The mean UCLA score reduced from 6.9 (95% CI 6.6 to 7.2) before injury to 6.1 (95% CI 5.8 to 6.4) post-injury (p < 0.001). There were 89% (n = 162) who returned to sport: 8% (n = 14) within three months, 34% (n = 62) within six months, and 70% (n = 127) within one year. Age ≥ 60 years was independently associated with failure to RTS (aOR 3.0 (95% CI 1.1 to 8.2); p = 0.036). No other factors were independently associated with failure to RTW or RTS. Conclusion. Most patients successfully return to work and sport following a humeral shaft fracture, albeit at a lower level of physical activity. Patients aged ≥ 60 yrs and those with proximal-third diaphyseal fractures are at increased risk of failing to return to activity. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):236–244

Aims. The use of biologics in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in Olympic and professional athletes appears to be increasing. There are no studies which currently map the extent, range, and nature of existing literature concerning the use and efficacy of such therapies in this arena. The objective of this scoping review is to map the available evidence regarding the use of biologics in the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries in Olympic and professional sport. Methods. Best-practice methodological frameworks suggested by Arksey and O’Malley, Levac et al, and the Joanna Briggs Institute will be used. This scoping review will aim to firstly map the current extent, range, and nature of evidence for biologic strategies to treat injuries in professional and Olympic sport; secondly, to summarize and disseminate existing research findings; and thirdly, to identify gaps in existing literature. A three-step search strategy will identify peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature, including reviews, original research, and both published and unpublished (‘grey’) literature. An initial limited search will identify suitable search terms, followed by a search of five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) using keyword and index terms. Studies will be screened independently by two reviewers for final inclusion. Dissemination. We will chart key concepts and evidence, and disseminate existing research findings to practitioners and clinicians, through both peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed literature, online platforms (including social media), conference, and in-person communications. We will identify gaps in current literature and priorities for further study

Aims. Return to sport following undergoing total (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been researched with meta-analyses and systematic reviews of varying quality. The aim of this study is to create an umbrella review to consolidate the data into consensus guidelines for returning to sports following TKA and UKA. Methods. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses written between 2010 and 2020 were systematically searched. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers and methodology quality was assessed. Variables for analysis included objective classification of which sports are safe to participate in postoperatively, time to return to sport, prognostic indicators of returning, and reasons patients do not. Results. A total of 410 articles were found, including 58 duplicates. Seven articles meeting inclusion criteria reported that 34% to 100% of patients who underwent TKA or UKA were able to return to sports at 13 weeks and 12 weeks respectively, with UKA patients more likely to do so. Prior experience with the sport was the most significant prognostic indicator for return. These patients were likely to participate in low-impact sports, particularly walking, cycling, golf, and swimming. Moderate-impact sport participation, such as doubles tennis and skiing, may be considered on a case-by-case basis considering the patient’s prior experience. There is insufficient long-term data on the risks to return to high-impact sport, such as decreased implant survivorship. Conclusion. There is a consensus that patients can return to low-impact sports following TKA or UKA. Return to moderate-impact sport was dependent on a case-by-case basis, with emphasis on the patient’s prior experience in the sport. Return to high-impact sports was not supported. Patients undergoing UKA return to sport one week sooner and with more success than TKA. Future studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes following return to high-impact sports to establish evidence-based recommendations. This review summarizes all available data for the most up-to-date and evidence-based guidelines for returning to sport following TKA and UKA to replace guidelines based on subjective physician survey data. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):245–251

The bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft has a lower rate of graft failure but a higher rate of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction. Subsequent contralateral injury may be a marker of success of the BTB graft, but it is unclear whether the type of graft influences the rate of return to sport. This study aimed to compare the rates of return to weekly sport and return to preinjury activity levels between the BTB and hamstring tendon autografts following primary ACL reconstruction. Prospective data on primary ACL reconstructions recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014-November 2019 were analyzed. The primary outcome was return to weekly sport, defined as a Marx activity score of 8, at 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was return to preinjury activity level, defined as a post-operative Marx activity score that was equal or greater to the patient's preinjury Marx score. Return to sport was compared between the BTB and hamstring tendon autografts via multivariate binary logistic regression with adjustment for patient demographics. 4259 patients were analyzed, of which 50.3% were playing weekly sport (n = 2144) and 28.4% had returned to their preinjury activity level (n = 1211) at 2-year follow-up. A higher rate of return to weekly sport was observed with the BTB autograft compared to the hamstring tendon autograft (58.7% versus 47.9%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.23, p = 0.009). Furthermore, the BTB autograft had a higher rate of return to preinjury activity levels (31.5% versus 27.5%, adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, p = 0.025). The BTB autograft is associated with a higher return to sport and may explain the higher rate of contralateral ACL injury following primary ACL reconstruction

Introduction. Symptomatic hip dysplasia is often treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Studies investigating the effect of PAO have primarily focused on radiographic measurements, pain-related outcomes, and hip survival whereas evidence related to sport participation is limited. Methods. All patients in our institutional database were deemed eligible for this cohort study if they underwent PAO and had answered at least one question related to sport participation. Patients were asked if they were playing sport preoperatively, 6 months after PAO as well as 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years after. In addition, patients were asked if they were able to play their preferred sport, what type and at what level they were playing sport, and if surgery had improved their sport performance. Results. Among 2398 patients surveyed, 1926 (80%) were included and 56% were playing sport 6 months after PAO. This number was 61% two years after PAO, and remained around that for the following years, before dropping 15 years after PAO. Between 56% and 71% of patients felt that their sporting performance improved following PAO at the different time points. Between 39% (6 months after PAO) and 63% (15 years after PAO) were able to participate in their preferred sport. Conclusion. The majority of patients undergoing PAO due to hip dysplasia will return to, and maintain, sport after PAO. More than half of patients undergoing PAO believe that the surgery improved their sports performance, and long after the surgery more than half of patients undergoing PAO are able to play their preferred sport

Abstract. Introduction. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting return to sport (RTS) and career longevity of elite athletes after microfracture of the knee. Methods. A retrospective review of a consecutive series of elite athletes with chondral injuries in the knee treated with microfracture was undertaken. RTS was defined as competing in at least one event at professional level or national/ international level in amateur sport. Demographic, pre, intra and post operative factors affecting RTS were analysed. Results. Fifty six athletes, including 35 (62.5%) footballers and 14 (25.0 %) rugby players, with a mean age 24.8 (+/− 3.9) years, were included. 18 (32.1 %) of chondral injuries were secondary to trauma, 20 (35.7 %) post meniscectomy, 9 (16.1%) post anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and 9 (16.1%) idiopathic. Fifty (89.3%) of athletes RTS at a mean time of 10.0 (+/−5.8) months. 43 (86.0%) athletes were still playing at 2 years. At 5 years 25 (59.5%) of the players who had RTS and had surgery more than 5 years ago were still playing professional sport. Factors associated with not playing at 5 years were cartilage lesions >1.5cm2(52.4% vs 66.7%), more than 1 lesion (35.7% vs74.1%), lateral meniscal surgery (42.1% vs 73.7%) and effusion on RTS (47.7% vs 72.2%). Conclusion. Over 89 % of elite athletes returned to professional sport after microfracture in the knee. However, the ability to continue playing is affected by several factors such as the extent of the chondral damage and recurrent effusions

Abstract. Introduction. Elite athletes sustaining a graft re-rupture after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) undergo revision reconstruction to enable their return to elite sport. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of return to play (RTP) and competition levels at 2 and 5 years post revision ACL-R. Methodology. A consecutive series of revision ACL-R in elite athletes undertaken by the senior author between 2009 and 2019 was retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures were RTP rates and competition level. Results. Forty-nine athletes underwent revision ACL-R and were included. 87.8% returned to elite sport of which 75.5% were at the same level. At 2 years post-surgery, 79.6% were still playing, 51% at the same level; and at 5 years 44.4% were still playing, 20% at the same level. Athletes with > 50% thickness chondral lesions were less likely to RTP (66.7% vs 94.6%, p = 0.026) and maintain the same competition level (50% vs 83.8%, p = 0.047). Those with medial meniscus pathology were less likely to RTP at the pre-injury level (64.5% vs 94.4%, p = 0.036). Median career length after revision ACL-R was 73 months (95% CI, 43.4 to 102.6), 23 months at the same level (95% CI, 13.6 to 32.4). The probability of still playing at 5 years post-surgery was 55.9% with 22.5% chance of maintaining pre-injury competition level. Conclusion. RTP rates and competition level of elite athletes decreased over time after revision ACL-R. Chondral pathology of > 50% thickness were associated with lower RTP rates and competition levels

As the field of hip arthroscopy continues to develop, functional measures and testing become increasingly important in patient selection, managing patient expectations prior to surgery, and physical readiness for return to athletic participation. The Hip Sport Test (HST) was developed to assess strength, coordination, agility, and range of motion prior to and following hip arthroscopy as a functional assessment. However, the relationship between HST and hip strength, range of motion, and hip-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) measures have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the HST scores and measurements of hip strength and range of motion prior to undergoing hip arthroscopy. Between September 2009 and January 2017, patients aged 18-40 who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement with available pre-operative HST, dynamometry, range of motion, and functional scores (mHHS, WOMAC, HOS-SSS) were identified. Patients were excluded if they were 40 years old, had a Tegner activity score < 7, or did not have HST and dynamometry evaluations within one week of each other. Muscle strength scores were compared between affected and unaffected side to establish a percent difference with a positive score indicating a weaker affected limb and a negative score indicating a stronger affected limb. Correlations were made between HST and strength testing, range of motion, and PROs. A total of 350 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 26.9 ± 6.5 years, with 34% females and 36% professional athletes. Total and component HST scores were significantly associated with measure of strength most strongly for flexion (rs = −0.20, p < 0 .001), extension (rs = −0.24, p<.001) and external rotation (rs = −0.20, p < 0 .001). Lateral and diagonal agility, components of HST, were also significantly associated with muscle strength imbalances between internal rotation versus external rotation (rs = −0.18, p=0.01) and flexion versus extension (rs = 0.12, p=0.03). In terms of range of motion, a significant correlation was detected between HST and internal rotation (rs = −0.19, p < 0 .001). Both the total and component HST scores were positively correlated with pre-operative mHHS, WOMAC, and HOS-SSS (p<.001 for all rs). The Hip Sport Test correlates with strength, range of motion, and PROs in the preoperative setting of hip arthroscopy. This test alone and in combination with other diagnostic examinations can provide valuable information about initial hip function and patient prognosis

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has high rates of patient satisfaction; however patient expectations for recreational and sporting activities are not always met. Our study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict whether patient expectations for sporting or recreational activity are met 12 months following THA. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively from 2015-2018 at one private hospital in Sydney. Age, gender, postcode, weight, and height were recorded preoperatively. Included participants underwent primary THA by one of the investigating surgeons. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed with an expectation fulfilment score used as the primary outcome variable. Preoperative predictor variables included: age, gender, BMI, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Oxford Hip Score, Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). 1019 participants were eligible and included. 13% reported that preoperative expectations of sport or recreation were not met at 12 months. Younger age, lower preoperative EQ VAS, and higher BMI were associated with failed expectations on multivariable analysis. Odds of failed expectations increased by 2% for every one year younger in age (OR= 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00, p=.048), by 2% for every one point lower on EQ VAS (OR=0.98, 95% CI = 0.98 to 0.99, p=.002), and by 4% for every one-point increase in BMI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.09, p=.042). Failure to have expectations met for sporting or recreational activity was associated with younger age, poorer general health, and high BMI. With a rise in younger patients who likely have higher physical demands, a tailored preoperative education is preferable to generic models to better manage patient expectations. Younger age, higher BMI, and poorer health may predict unmet expectations for sport and recreation after THA. Tailored education in these groups should be considered

Introduction. Achilles Tendon Rupture (ATR) is a prevalent injury in Western society. Much of the recent research has focused on measuring surgical methods and strength regained, rather than practical measures such as Return to Sport (RTS). A large systematic review was published in 2016 setting a benchmark RTS as 80%. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an up-to-date RTS following ATR. Methods. PubMed and SPORTdiscuss databases were used to search for eligible studies published since 2017 that focused on closed Achilles tendon ruptures with clear definitions of return to sport and a minimum length of follow-up. The Newcastle-Ottawa grading tool was used to assess risk of bias in all included studies. Results. Of 15 articles identified, 9 were ‘good’ and 6 were ‘fair’ after bias assessment, with none excluded for being poor. Return-to-sport (RTS) rate following Achilles tendon rupture was 76.76% (95% CI 74.19, 79.34 P= <0.001). Non-professional athletes had a higher RTS rate (78.29%; 95% CI 74.89, 81.68 P= <0.001) than professional athletes (74.91%; 95% CI 70.98, 78.85 P= <0.001). Surgical intervention resulted in a lower RTS rate (74.17%; 95% CI 70.74, 77.60 P= <0.001) than conservative management (70.00%; 95% CI 60.48, 79.52 P= <0.001). Conclusion. These findings highlight the need to identify factors affecting RTS rates, including the type of management, level of sport, and patient-specific factors. Clinicians can use these findings to guide informed shared decision-making with patients regarding the long-term implications of ATR and to develop more targeted rehabilitation strategies for this injury

Barriers to successful return to previous level of activity following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Recon-struction (ACLR) are multifactorial and recent research suggests that athletic performance deficits persist after completion of the rehabilitation course in a large percentage of patients. Thirty soccer athletes (26.9 ± 5.7 years old, male) with ACL injury were surgically treated with all-inside technique and semitendi-nosus tendon autograft. At 2 years from surgery, they were called back for clinical examination, self-reported psychological scores, and biomechanical outcomes (balance, strength, agility and velocity, and symmetry). Nonparametric statistical tests have been adopted for group comparisons in terms of age, concomitant presence of meniscus tear, injury on dominant leg, presence of knee laxity, presence of varus/valgus, body sides, and return to different levels of sports. Athletes with lower psychological scores showed lesser values in terms of power, resistance and neuromuscular activity as compared to the ones with good psychological scores that showed, instead, better self-reported outcomes (TLKS, CRSQ) and low fear of reinjury (TSK). In the athletes who had a functional deficit in at least one subtest, a safe return to sports could not have been recommended. Our findings confirmed that demographics, physical function, and psychological factors were related to playing the preinjury level sport at mean 2 years after surgery, sup-porting the notion that returning to sport after surgery is multifactorial. A strict qualitative and quantitative assessment of athletes’ status should be performed at different follow-ups after surgery to guarantee a safe and controlled RTP

In this review, we discuss the evidence for patients returning to sport after hip arthroplasty. This includes the choices regarding level of sporting activity and revision or complications, the type of implant, fixation and techniques of implantation, and how these choices relate to health economics. It is apparent that despite its success over six decades, hip arthroplasty has now evolved to accommodate and support ever-increasing patient demands and may therefore face new challenges. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):661–663

Most people have not returned to their pre-injury level of sports participation 12 months following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Twelve months may be too early to assess return to sport outcomes accurately. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term return to sport outcomes following ACL reconstruction surgery. A self-report questionnaire was used to collect data from people at 2 to 7 years following ACL reconstruction surgery regarding pre-injury sports participation, post-operative sports participation and subjective knee function. The main inclusion criteria were participation in regular sports activity prior to surgery and the attendance of routine surgical follow up appointments. A total of 314 people were included at a mean 39.6 ± 13.8 months following ACL reconstruction surgery. At follow up, 45% of people were playing sport at their pre-injury level and 29% were playing competitive sport. Of those playing competitive sport prior to injury, 46% were playing competitive sport at follow up. Ninety three percent of people had attempted sport at some time following their ACL reconstruction surgery. People who had not attempted their pre-injury level of sport by 12 months following surgery were just as likely to have returned to pre-injury level by 39 months after surgery as those who had played sport by 12 months (risk ratio, 95% CI = 1.1, 0.76–1.6). Less than 50% of people had returned to either their pre-injury level of sport or competitive sport when surveyed at 2 to 7 years following ACL reconstruction surgery. Sporting activity at 12 months was not predictive of participation at 2 to 7 years, suggesting that people who return to sport within 12 months may not maintain their sports participation

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has been promoted as a procedure that results in a better outcome in sporting and work activity after surgery compared to total hip replacement (THR). Recently more standard THRs have offered the same large metal on metal joint articulation but using a standard stem. Method: Questionnaires were analysed from 125 metal on metal total hip replacement (THR) and 108 hip resurfacing (HR) patients regarding participation in sport and returning to work at a minimum of a year after surgery. Results: The two groups had similar mean age (61 vs 60) and pre-operative Oxford hip scores (41 vs 38). Seventy-one of 125 THR (57%) patients compared to 76 of 108 (70%) HR patients participated in sporting activity in the year after their surgery (fishers exact test, p value=0.04). When including only patients that played sport before their surgery 54 of 75 (72%) THR and 66 of 83 (80%) HR patients returned to same sporting activity level after their surgery (fishers exact test, p value=0.35). Of the patients that worked before surgery 35 of 44 (80%) THR patients compared to 70 of 74 (95%) HR patients returned work to after their surgery (fishers exact test, p value= 0.02). Conclusion: There was no difference in the proportion of patients who played sport prior to their surgery returning to sport. After hip resurfacing however more people took up a sporting activity and at a year post surgery a greater number of patients were taking part in sport after a hip resurfacing. Patients with a hip resurfacing were more likely to return to work after surgery

Open fractures are uncommon in the UK sporting population, however because of their morbidity then are a significant patient group. Currently there is very little in the literature describing the epidemiology of open fracture in sport. We describe the epidemiology of sport related open fractures from one centre's adult patient population. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database recording all sport related open fracture s over a 15 year period in a standard population. Over the 15 year period, there were 85 fractures in 84 patients. The mean age was 29.2 years (range 15–67). 70 (83%) were male and fourteen female (17%). The six most common sports were football (n=19, 22%), rugby (n=9, 11%), cycling (n=8, 9%), hockey (n=8, 9%); horse riding (n=6, 7%) and skiing (n=6, 7%). The top five anatomical locations were fingers phalanges, 35%; tibia-fibula 23%; foreman 14%; ankle 11% and metacarpals 5%. The mean injury severity score was 7.02. Forty five patients were grade 1; 28 patients were grade 2; 8 patients were grade 3a; and 4 were grade 3b according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification system. Seven patients (8%) required plastic surgical intervention for the treatment of these fractures. The types of flaps used were split skin graft (n=4), fasciocutaneous flaps (n=2); and adipofascial flap (n=1). We looked at the epidemiology open fractures secondary to sport in one centre over a 15 year period. Football was the most common sport (22%) and within football, the most common site was the tibia and fibula. In contrast, within the cohort a whole the majority of fractures were upper limb, with the hand being the most common site. Whilst not common in sport, when they are sustained they are frequently occur on muddy sport fields or forest tracks and must be treated appropriately. A good understanding of the range and variety of injuries commonly sustained in different sports is important for clinicians and sports therapists

Purpose of Study: To examine if and when patients return to sporting activity following surgery, and how their subjective assessment of ability to perform activities was affected by their injury and surgery. We also wished to examine if there was any difference in the timing of return to sport between different sporting activities and by graft (hamstring or bone, patella tendon, bone (BTB)) used for ACL reconstruction. Method and Results: 252 ACL reconstructions were followed up for 2.5 years post surgery. They were evaluated pre and post surgery with Mohtadi activity scores evaluating their function for their primary and secondary sporting activities. They were also evaluated regards exactly when they got back if at all to their primary and secondary activities. 84.2% returned to activity1 at a mean of 9.3 months 87.2% returned to activity 2 at a mean of 8.5 months. 60.7% of patients who returned to activity 1 returned at the same level as prior to their injury. 69.8% of those who returned to activity 2 returned at the same level as prior to their injury. There was no significant difference in timing of return to sport between hamstring and BTB graft. Discussion: We can conclude from this study that the mean time to return to sport following ACL reconstruction is close to what most surgeons) are telling their patients (i.e. 6 to 9 months). However there is wide variation between subjects with a number of complex factors affecting when a person returns to their activity. It is probably wrong for us to give the expectation to all patients that they will be back to their preferred activities at 6 to 9 months

The Mater Hospital is Ireland’s primary referral centre for spinal injuries receiving 80–90% of all spinal cases annually. In today’s society the number of people competing at more competitive and professional levels is also increasing. Over the years, a lot of work has gone into safety precautions in sport. However despite those improvements our impression was that the incidence of both minor and serious sporting injuries is increasing. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, pattern and mechanism of sports-related spinal injuries in Ireland over the last decade. Data was collected by performing an audit of the National Spinal Injuries Database from 1994–2001. This database is a prospective computerized database. Data entered relates to the initial presentation, mechanism, level of injury and their acute in-hospital management. On average 200–220 patients are admitted annually to the National Injuries Spinal Unit. 173 of these were related to sport, which represented 13% of total spinal injuries. 80% are male under 40 years. 29% sustained neurological deficit. The sports responsible for most spinal injuries in Ireland were equestrian (43.8%), followed by rugby (16.4%), diving (15%), GAA (13.6%) and skiing (3%). Rugby injuries were most likely to cause neurological damage. Equestrian accidents commonly caused thoracolumbar fractures while injuries sustained in diving, rugby and GAA were mostly to the cervical spine. Sport is an important cause of spinal injuries in Ire-land. Coaches and team doctors must be educated about safe practices and emergency management of these terrible injuries and for those unfortunately affected in the prime of their lives adequate rehabilitation resources need to be implemented so as to lessen their economic burden

A retrospective review of all patients presenting to the multinational integrated medical unit at Sipovo in Bosnia-Herzegovina during the period 1 June 2000 to 30 November 2000 was carried out. During this 6-month period, 203 new patients presented to the orthopaedic surgeon; these patients form the basis of this study. Of the 203 patients, 54 (26.6%) presented with chronic problems, but of these 18 (33.3%) had been exacerbated by sporting activities during the tour. The remaining 149 (73.4%) presented with acute problems, and of these sports injury was the most common cause. Traffic accidents, military training injuries, non-specific trauma (falls, crush injures etc) and acute orthopaedic problems such as sciatica accounted for the remainder of the causes. These data are presented in table 1. Football was again the most common cause of injury accounting for 34.4% of all sporting injuries, and the lower limb, particularly the ankle, was the most common site of injury. The wisdom of allowing this sport, during operational tours, must be questioned. Only 5 (8.2%) of the patients presenting with sports injuries were discharged straight back to full duties. The majority (70.5%) received light duties (mean 14.4 days), but 13 patients (21.3%) required admission to hospital of which 9 were subsequently evacuated out of theatre. The total number of patients used for this review was 203 of which 13 were trauma from traffic accidents, 61 were sporting injuries, 7 from military training, 52 were non specific trauma, 11, the cause was not recorded, 5 were acute non traumatic orthopedic problems, 18 were chronic and exacerbated by sport and 36 were not related to sport at all

Purpose: To examine if and when patients return to sporting activity following surgery and how their subjective assessment of ability to perform activities was affected by their injury and surgery. We also wished to examine if there was any difference in the timing of return to sport between different sporting activities and by graft (hamstring or bone, patella tendon, bone (BTB)) used for ACL reconstruction. Method and Results: 252 ACL reconstructions were followed up for 2.5 years post surgery. Theyere evaluated pre and post surgery with Mohtadi activity scores evaluating their function for their primary and secondary sporting activities. They were also evaluated regards exactly when they got back if at all to their primary and secondary activities. 84.2% returned to activity1 at a mean of 9.3 months 87.2% returned to activity 2 at a mean of 8.5 months. 60.7% of patients who returned to activity 1 returned at the same level as prior to their injury. 69.8% of those who returned to activity 2 returned at the same level as prior to their injury. There was no significant difference in timing of return to sport between hamstring or BTB graft. Discussion: We can conclude from this study that the mean time to return to sport following ACL reconstruction is close to what most surgeons) are telling their patients (i.e. 6 to 9 months). However there is wide variation between subjects with a number of complex factors affecting when a person returns to their activity. It is probably wrong for us to give the expectation to all patients that they will be back to their preferred activities at 6 to 9 months

Introduction: Sports injuries to the cervical spine account for about one in ten of all cervical spine injuries. They occur at all levels of participation. Fortunately, the number of patients suffering spinal cord injury is relatively small. Neurological injuries may range from transient quadriparesis through to complete quadriplegia. The decision to allow sportsmen to return to sport following a cervical spine injury is complex. It is based on such factors as history, clinical examination, the nature of the injury, as well as age and other psychosocial factors. The evidence that exists to aid this decision process is at times conflicting. The aim of this presentation is to review some of the contentious issues that exist in the decision making by reference to case presentations of high level sportsmen who were treated following a variety of cervical spine injuries. Methods: Four high-level rugby players (22–31 years old) presented with different cervical spine injuries sustained during sporting activities. Two subjects sustained a “stinger” and two a transient quadriparesis which rapidly resolved. Radiological evaluation included assessment of spinal canal diameter. 1. Results: Two had a C5-6 disc bulge with developmental spinal stenosis. A third had a congenital fusion C2-3 with a disc bulge and developmental stenosis at C3-4. Case 4 had degenerative disc disease at C5-6. All were treated non-operatively and returned to sport. All suffered a recurrence of the neurological symptoms and subsequently underwent an anterior interbody fusion (Case 4 for subluxation of C6-7). Three successfully resumed rugby six months after surgery while one elected not to continue. Discussion: The decision to allow a patient to return to contact sports following a cervical spine injury may be difficult. The four cases presented highlight some of these contentious issues such as transient neurological deficit and the effect that surgery may have on a patient’s ability to return safely to sport. A review of the literature may assist in the decision making. 1,. 2. This may be conflicting and difficult to interpret. Neurological signs, instability, displacement, fusion of more than one level and occipito-atlanto-axial pathologies are considered absolute contraindications. 3