Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 106
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 3 | Pages 144 - 153
1 Mar 2017
Kharwadkar N Mayne B Lawrence JE Khanduja V

Objectives. Bisphosphonates are widely used as first-line treatment for primary and secondary prevention of fragility fractures. Whilst they have proved effective in this role, there is growing concern over their long-term use, with much evidence linking bisphosphonate-related suppression of bone remodelling to an increased risk of atypical subtrochanteric fractures of the femur (AFFs). The objective of this article is to review this evidence, while presenting the current available strategies for the management of AFFs. Methods. We present an evaluation of current literature relating to the pathogenesis and treatment of AFFs in the context of bisphosphonate use. Results. Six broad themes relating to the pathogenesis and management of bisphosphonate-related AFFs are presented. The key themes in fracture pathogenesis are: bone microdamage accumulation; altered bone mineralisation and altered collagen formation. The key themes in fracture management are: medical therapy and surgical therapy. In addition, primary prevention strategies for AFFs are discussed. Conclusions. This article presents current knowledge about the relationship between bisphosphonates and the development of AFFs, and highlights key areas for future research. In particular, studies aimed at identifying at-risk subpopulations and organising surveillance for those on long-term therapy will be crucial in both increasing our understanding of the condition, and improving population outcomes. Cite this article: N. Kharwadkar, B. Mayne, J. E. Lawrence, V. Khanduja. Bisphosphonates and atypical subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:144–153. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.63.BJR-2016-0125.R1


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 35 - 35
1 Sep 2012
White D Cusick L Napier R Elliott J Adair A
Full Access

To determine the outcome of subtrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary (IM) nailing and identify causes for implant failure. We performed a retrospective analysis of all subtrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nailing in Belfast trauma units between February 2006 and 2009. This subgroup of patients was identified using the Fractures Outcome Research Database (FORD). Demographic data, implant type, operative details, duration of surgery and level of operator were collected and presented. Post-operative X-rays were assessed for accuracy of reduction. One hundred and twenty two (122) patients were identified as having a subtrochanteric fracture treated by IM nailing. There were 79 females and 43 males. Age range was 16 to 93 (mean 78). 95 (78%) cases were performed by training grades and 27 (22%) by consultants. Duration of surgery ranged from 73–129mins (mean 87mins). 47 patients (38.5%) were found to have a suboptimal reduction and 75 patients (61.5%) had an anatomical reduction on immediate post-operative x-ray. One year from surgery 73/122 patients were available for follow up. Of those patients with suboptimal reduction, 13/47 (27.7%) required further surgery. 8 required complete revision with bone grafting, and 5 underwent dynamisation. A further 6 patients had incomplete union. In the anatomical group, 4 patients underwent further surgery (5%). 3 required dynamisation and one had exchange nailing for an infected non-union. 3 patients had incomplete union at last follow up. 5/47 (10.6%) had open reduction in the suboptimal group compared to 25/75 (33.3%) in the anatomical group. Of the 27 cases performed by consultants, 13 (48%) were open reduction, compared to 17/93 (18%) by training grades. This study has shown that inadequate reduction of subtrochanteric fractures, leads to increased rates of non union and ultimately implant failure. We recommend a low threshold for performing open reduction to ensure anatomical reduction is achieved in all cases


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 173 - 173
1 Feb 2004
Papadopoulos G Konstas A Tziboukas G
Full Access

Purpose of this study is to compare the two techniques, [sliding nail plate, or locking intramedullary nail type ã], and to estimate their results of the surgical treatment of the subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Material and methods. From the January 1999 till December 2002, 38 subtrochanteric fractures patients have been operated in our clinic. According to the classification of AO/ASIF 12 of them were type A, 18 were type B and 8 type C. 28 patients were female & 10 male, aged from 41 to 90 years (mean 85 years old). 22 of cases were followed up for at least 6 months up to 20 months. 5 of the patients died for reasons other than the fracture itself and its treatment. The remaining 11 cases failed to appear for a follow-up. They were all surgically treated. In 8 cases we performed the 135 DHS nailing and in the 21 cases the 95 DCP nailing. In the remaining 9 fracture cases we performed intramedullary nail type ã nail. In some cases, (plaiting – surgery) we used allograft. There were no intrasurgical complications. Two material breakages, [failure], occurred as post-surgical complication [95 DCP), the one was treated with locking intramedullary nail type ã, and the other with prosthetic replacement [ Thomson]. The patients started moving immediately, although they used partial wait bearing in a period of 3 days to 6 weeks, depending on the type of fracture and internal fixation. The operation lasted from 3/4h up to 2h and we transfused from 1 to 3 blood units (mean 2,5). Results were better with locking intramedullary nail, than with any type of plating, [biological advantages – less failure]. Conclusion. All subtrocanteric fractures should be treated by stable internal fixation. Our recent experience with the new undreamed AO nail, and its versatile proximal locking has been very favorable


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 36 - 36
1 Sep 2012
Ahmad M Obakponovwe O Mokawem M Kanakaris N Giannoudis P
Full Access

Background. The management of non-unions of subtrochanteric femoral fractures with associated implant failure is challenging. This study assessed the outcome of a cohort of patients treated according to the diamond concept. Methods. Between 2005–2010 all patients with subtrochanteric aseptic non-unions presented post implant failure (Gamma Nail breakage) were eligible in the absence of severe systemic pathologies and comorbidities. Demographics, initial fracture pattern, method of stabilisation, mode of failure of metal work, time to revision of fixation, complications, time to union, and functional outcome were recorded over a minimum period of follow-up of 12 months. The revision strategy was based on the “diamond concept;” optimising the mechanical and biological environment (revision of fixation, osteoinduction/BMP-7, osteoconduction/RIA harvested graft, and osteogenicity/concentrate of bone marrow aspirate). Results. Out of 280 nailing procedures 12 (4.3%) cases met the inclusion criteria. A consistent mode of metalwork failure was recorded with initial breakage of the proximal distal locking screw followed by nail breakage at the lag screw level. Biomechanical SEM analysis of the nails revealed no structural damage besides the standard fatigue striation. Varus mal-reduction was present in all cases, with an average of 7.3 degrees (5–11). The average time to screw failure was 4.3 months (2–6) and nail failure was 5.9 months (4–10). All but one of the cases were revised to a 95 degrees blade plate and one to an Affixus nail. Time to union was 6.5 months (5–10). All but one of the cases by 12 months have returned to their preinjury level of mobilisation. Conclusion. Varus mal-reduction must be avoided in the initial stabilisation of subtrochanteric fractures. Proximal distal screw failure is predictive of future fracture non-union and subsequent nail breakage. The diamond concept for optimising mechanics and bone biology is a successful method for managing complex sub-trochanteric non-unions with failed metalwork


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 335 - 335
1 Jul 2008
Ekeocha O Bhattacharyya M
Full Access

Background: To highlight the higher incidence of sub-trochanteric fracture following cannulated screws fixation for the neck of femur fracture, which may be due to surgical errors and osteoporotic bone. Method: Illustrative case report of a 78 years old demented independently mobile female patient who was admitted with an intracapsular Neck of Femur fracture, treated with cannulated screws. 2 weeks post operatively, she developed subtrochanteric undisplaced proximal femoral fracture without any trauma. She was treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion: The valgus impacted neck of femur fracture, treated with cannulated screws is associated with some inherent problems. The cannulated screws can become incarcerated during initial open-reduction internal fixation and break. The incidence of subtrochanteric fracture following hip operation is greater with an entry point in the lateral cortex below the level of the most inferior edge of the lesser trochanter. Although in our case study, we placed the screw above the lesser trochanter. It has been reported that two screws in the inferior part of the femoral neck create a stress riser in the sub-trochanteric region, potentially inducing a fracture in the weakened bone, and it may be induced by a trauma. In this case study failure may be due to multiple drill holes on the lateral cortex during insertion of the guide wire [fig 2]. Subtrochanteric fracture following cannulated screws may occur without trauma. Osteoporosis may have a major role to play. We recommend one screw infe-riorioly and entry point above the lesser trochanter as reported previously


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 4, Issue 10 | Pages 801 - 807
23 Oct 2023
Walter N Szymski D Kurtz SM Lowenberg DW Alt V Lau EC Rupp M

Aims. This work aimed at answering the following research questions: 1) What is the rate of mechanical complications, nonunion and infection for head/neck femoral fractures, intertrochanteric fractures, and subtrochanteric fractures in the elderly USA population? and 2) Which factors influence adverse outcomes?. Methods. Proximal femoral fractures occurred between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 were identified from the Medicare Physician Service Records Data Base. The Kaplan-Meier method with Fine and Gray sub-distribution adaptation was used to determine rates for nonunion, infection, and mechanical complications. Semiparametric Cox regression model was applied incorporating 23 measures as covariates to identify risk factors. Results. Union failure occured in 0.89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.95) after head/neck fracturs, in 0.92% (95% CI 0.84 to 1.01) after intertrochanteric fracture and in 1.99% (95% CI 1.69 to 2.33) after subtrochanteric fractures within 24 months. A fracture-related infection was more likely to occur after subtrochanteric fractures than after head/neck fractures (1.64% vs 1.59%, hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.17); p < 0.001) as well as after intertrochanteric fractures (1.64% vs 1.13%, HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.52); p < 0.001). Anticoagulant use, cerebrovascular disease, a concomitant fracture, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, open fracture, and rheumatoid disease was identified as risk factors. Mechanical complications after 24 months were most common after head/neck fractures with 3.52% (95% CI 3.41 to 3.64; currently at risk: 48,282). Conclusion. The determination of complication rates for each fracture type can be useful for informed patient-clinician communication. Risk factors for complications could be identified for distinct proximal femur fractures in elderly patients, which are accessible for therapeutical treatment in the management. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(10):801–807


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 18 - 18
14 Nov 2024
Rau Y Amtsfeld J Reimers N Behrends L Hinz N Schulz AP
Full Access

Introduction. Hip fractures, with a global age-standardised incidence rate (per 100,000 population) of 187.2 (2019), are a major public health problem. With a 7.71 billion population worldwide in 2019, hip fractures, in general, are affecting around 14.43 million people per year globally. We aim to provide a nationwide epidemiological analysis of trochanteric fractures and their respective surgical treatments. In this study we research the epidemiology of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, as well as their most common kinds of osteosynthesis, on a nationwide scale in Germany. Method. Data was retrieved from the national database of the German Ministry of Interior. ICD-10-GM and OPS-data from the period of 2006-2020 were analyzed, all patients with trochanteric/subtrochanteric fractures were included. Patients were grouped by age/gender and linear-regression was performed to calculate statistically significant correlations between variables/incidences. Result. 985,104 trochanteric and 178,810 subtrochanteric-fractures were reported during the analyzed period. This calculates to a mean incidence of 80.08±6.34 for pertrochanteric and 14.53±1.50 for subtrochanteric fractures per-million-inhabitants. In both fracture-types, a distinct dependence of incidence on age can be seen. Incidence rates equally rise in both sexes through the age groups with an increase of about 288-fold from those under 60 to those over the age of 90 in pertrochanteric fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the most common kind of treatment for both fracture types with augmentative cerclages on the rise throughout the whole period. Dynamic compression screws were decreasing in frequency. Conclusion. We found an ongoing increase of incidence among the elderly and an increase in intramedullary nailing as well as augmentative cerclages. Not only could we show an age-dependence of the incidences, but also a sex-dependence that seems to remain consistent in its development. While younger males (<60 years) are at a higher risk than their female peers, older females are at significantly higher risk than their male peers


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 10 | Pages 644 - 653
14 Oct 2020
Kjærvik C Stensland E Byhring HS Gjertsen J Dybvik E Søreide O

Aims. The aim of this study was to describe variation in hip fracture treatment in Norway expressed as adherence to international and national evidence-based treatment guidelines, to study factors influencing deviation from guidelines, and to analyze consequences of non-adherence. Methods. International and national guidelines were identified and treatment recommendations extracted. All 43 hospitals routinely treating hip fractures in Norway were characterized. From the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), hip fracture patients aged > 65 years and operated in the period January 2014 to December 2018 for fractures with conclusive treatment guidelines were included (n = 29,613: femoral neck fractures (n = 21,325), stable trochanteric fractures (n = 5,546), inter- and subtrochanteric fractures (n = 2,742)). Adherence to treatment recommendations and a composite indicator of best practice were analyzed. Patient survival and reoperations were evaluated for each recommendation. Results. Median age of the patients was 84 (IQR 77 to 89) years and 69% (20,427/29,613) were women. Overall, 79% (23,390/29,613) were treated within 48 hours, and 80% (23,635/29,613) by a surgeon with more than three years’ experience. Adherence to guidelines varied substantially but was markedly better in 2018 than in 2014. Having a dedicated hip fracture unit (OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.11) and a hospital hip fracture programme (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27) increased the probability of treatment according to best practice. Surgery after 48 hours increased one-year mortality significantly (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.22; p = 0.001). Alternative treatment to arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) increased mortality after 30 days (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.62)) and one year (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.72), and also increased the number of reoperations (OR 4.61, 95% CI 3.73 to 5.71). An uncemented stem increased the risk of reoperation significantly (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48; p = 0.030). Conclusion. Our study demonstrates a substantial variation between hospitals in adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treatment of hip fractures in Norway. Non-adherence can be ascribed to in-hospital factors. Poor adherence has significant negative consequences for patients in the form of increased mortality rates at 30 and 365 days post-treatment and in reoperation rates. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-10:644–653


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 11 - 11
1 Oct 2022
Kristensen N Lange J Frøslev T Pedersen AB
Full Access

Aim. To investigate the incidence and time-trend in reoperation due to deep Surgical Site Infection (SSI) following hip fracture surgery. Method. This was a population-based, nationwide, cohort study. We included 74,771 from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fractures Register (1) consisting of patients 65 years of age or older, who underwent surgery between January 1. st. 2005 and December 31. st. 2016 for all types of hip fracture. Cross-linkage with the Danish National Patient Register and The Danish Civil Registration system was made. Demographic data extracted included vital status, civil status, gender, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), fracture classification (AO/OTA 31A-C) and surgical procedures binary registered as joint replacement or internal fixation, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and secondary diseases not included in CCI. Outcome was reoperations due to deep SSI in accordance with the definition from Centre for Disease Control (2). We computed cumulative incidence rates and risk ratios (RR) by calendar year periods and by different risk factors, considering death as competing risk and adjusting for age, gender, CCI, fracture type and surgery type. Results. Within 365 days of primary surgery 2.1% of all hip fractures had undergone reoperation due to deep SSI. During the period 2005–2016, the incidence of reoperation due to SSI decreased from 2.7% to 1.7%, We could not identify differences in reoperation due to SSI within one year regarding gender, BMI or CCI. Patients aged above 85 had about 50% lower risk of being reoperated compared with the youngest age group; 65–74 years (RR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.4:0.6). The RR for reoperation due to deep SSI was lower for patients with pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA: 31A1-3) versus femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B1-3), RR was 0.7 (95%CI: 0.7:0.8). However, RR for surgery type (joint replacement vs internal fixation) at 365 days was significantly lower for joint replacement, RR: 0.6 (95% CI: 0.6:0.7). Conclusions. This study shows reoperation risk due to SSI for all types of hip fractures of 2.1%. There was a 45% decrease in reoperation over time from 2005 to 2016. However, the risk of revision is still high, and further action in avoidance of SSI should be taken


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 230 - 230
1 Sep 2012
Matre K Vinje T Havelin LI Gjertsen J Furnes O Espehaug B Fevang J
Full Access

Introduction. The treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures remains controversial, and new implants are constantly being developed trying to improve outcome and minimize the number of complications in these fractures. In Norway the Sliding Hip Screw(SHS), with or without a Trochanteric Stabilizing Plate (TSP), is still the most commonly used implant, but worldwide nailing of these fractures is increasing. This trend, however, has not been supported by documentation of better clinical results compared to the SHS in well designed studies. Therefore, in the present study we compared the recently launched Trigen Intertan nail (Smith and Nephew) with the SHS in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Patients and Methods. In a prospective, randomized multicenter study with 697 patients, we compared the Trigen Intertan nail with the SHS regarding postoperative pain, functional mobility, complications, and reoperation rates. Patients older than 60 years with trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures were included in 5 hospitals. At day 5, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively, pain was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Timed Up and Go-test (TUG-test) was performed to evaluate functional mobility. Complications and reoperations were recorded at discharge, and after 3 and 12 months. Results. 328 patients were evaluated at day 5 postoperatively. At mobilization patients treated with the nail had less pain compared to the SHS (VAS 47 vs. 53, p=0.02). Still, a difference of 6 points may not be of clinical significance. There was no difference in pain at rest or in early functional mobility. The length of postoperative hospital stay was also similar for the two groups (8.5 and 8.4 days respectively). At 3 (457 patients) and 12 months (374 patients) there was no difference in pain or TUG-test performance. At discharge, and after 3 and 12 months the overall reoperation rate for the groups was similar, and there was no difference regarding general complications. The results were comparable for the two groups, regardless of fracture classification (stable or unstable fractures). However, postoperative femoral fractures still seems to be an issue even with modern nails. 5 postoperative femoral fractures were encountered in the Intertan group, whereas 1 occurred in the SHS-group. Conclusion. Overall, there was no major difference in the results for the Intertan nail and the SHS in our study. Both methods provided predictable and good results in the treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. We found however less pain at mobilization for patients operated with a nail at day 5 postoperatively compared to the SHS. No difference in pain or function was evident at any later follow up. There was no difference in reoperation rates between the groups, but more postoperative ipsilateral femoral fractures occurred in the Intertan group. The clinical results in this study do not support the trend towards more nailing of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 62 - 62
1 Mar 2010
Das De* S Setiobudi T Das De S
Full Access

Recent reports suggest that long-term alendronate therapy may result in an unusual pattern of femoral subtrochanteric fracture. We aimed to determine if the presence of a specific radiographic feature in patients on alendronate could be used to predict an impending insufficiency fracture and thereby prevent its occurrence through further investigations and prophylactic fixation in high-risk patients. Sixty-two subtrochanteric fractures treated surgically from 2001 to 2007 were reviewed and radiographs of 25 low-energy fractures were independently evaluated. Incidence of alendronate therapy, clinical data, and other investigations like bone mineral density (BMD) scans were recorded. Seventeen fractures (68%) were associated with alendronate therapy. Hypertrophy of the lateral cortex of the femur with splaying of the fracture ends was noted in 70.1% of patients on alendronate; initial radiographs were not available in 17.6% and 11.8% had stress fractures identified by bone scan. None of the fractures in the non-alendronate group had this pattern. The fracture configuration in the alendronate group suggested that an ellipsoid thickening in the lateral cortex had been present prior to fracture. Indeed, 6 patients on alendronate (35.3%) had pre-existing radiographs as early as 3 years prior to fracture and all had this feature. Four of them had bone scans, which confirmed a stress fracture. Hip pain was often associated with this radiographic sign but may not be specific as patients were already on follow-up for other musculoskeletal conditions. BMD scans were not predictive of an impending fracture as they were mostly in the osteopaenic range. Only 50% with proven stress fractures had prophylactic fixation, while the remainder sustained overt fractures. Alendronate-related subtrochanteric fractures are associated with a specific pre-existing radiographic abnormality. We recommend that all patients on long-term alendronate - particularly those with hip pain or a previous subtrochanteric fracture - be routinely followed-up with plain radiographs of the pelvis. If an ellipsoid feature is noted in the subtrochanteric region, further investigations like bone scan or MRI should be sought. Patients with evidence of stress fracture should be strongly considered for prophylactic operative fixation. We believe this is a cost-effective strategy to prevent subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures in patients on alendronate


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 189 - 189
1 May 2012
Isaacs J Shidiak L Harris I Szomor Z
Full Access

Emerging evidence has linked the long-term use of alendronate (fosamax) with subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures. However, findings to date have been anecdotal. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence of subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures and identify whether they were more prevalent following the introduction of alendronate in Australia. All patients that presented between January 2007 and February 2009 with low- energy subtrochanteric fracture were identified. Similar data were collected between January 1995 and February 1997 as this was immediately prior to introduction of alendronate in Australia. The radiographs were examined for failure due to pre- existing insufficiency fracture. Characteristic findings were a transverse fracture line on the tension side of the femur with lateral cortical thickening immediately adjacent to the fracture. Relevant details from the history were recorded. We also separately identified all patients that presented between 2007 and 2009 with a proximal femoral fracture and determined the proportion taking alendronate. One hundred and seventeen patients with low-energy subtrochanteric fracture were included. Seventy-nine patients presented between 2007 and 2009 and 38 presented between 1995 and 1997. Forty-one of the 79 (52%) patients were identified as having radiograph findings suggestive of underlying insufficiency fracture, whilst none were identified prior to the introduction of alendronate. Of the 41 patients with subtrochanteric insufficiency fracture, 40 (98%) had been taking alendronate and one had been taking risedronate. Twenty-nine of the 41 (71%) complained of prodromal pain in the affected femur. Eighteen of the 41 (44%) demonstrated subtrochanteric insufficiency changes on the contralateral side and 9 of 41 (22%) sustained spontaneous non-traumatic fracture during activities of daily living. Of the 38 patients without insufficiency changes, 12 (32%) had been taking alendronate. Alendronate use was therefore strongly suggestive of insufficiency fracture (sensitivity = 98%, specificity = 84%, PPV = 77%, NPV = 99%, LR+ = 6). The mean duration of alendronate use in those with insufficiency fracture was 7.1 years (95% CI, 6.6-7.6 years). The mean duration in those without was 3.2 years (95% CI, 2.6-3.8 years, P<0.0001). Three hundred and ninety eight patients presented with a low-energy proximal femur fracture between 2007 and 2009. Of these, only 52 (13%, P<0.0001) were taking alendronate. This is the largest study in the literature on subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures and alendronate therapy. Confirming recent reports, alendronate use was strongly suggestive of subtrochanteric insufficiency fracture. Our findings provide the most compelling evidence to date of the potential long-term sequelae of alendronate but more research is needed before definitive conclusions can be made


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 507 - 507
1 Aug 2008
Peyser A Goldman V Khoury A Mosheiff R Liebergall M
Full Access

Introduction: Reversed oblique subtrochanteric fractures are unstable and pose a surgical challenge. Fixation with Dynamic Hip Screw is prone to collapse with medial displacement and high rate of non or mal union. The use of Proximal Femoral Nails may result in non anatomical reduction which delays union and impedes rehabilitation. PCCP is a percutaneous plate originally designed for fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. However, the plate supports the greater trochanter and can prevent collapse of subtrochanteric fractures and rigidly secure the femoral neck. This study summarized our experience in fixating reversed oblique subtrochanteric fracture with the PCCP technique. Patients and Methods: Between January 2005 and March 2006 26 patients who sustained reversed oblique subtrochanteric fractures (AO-31A3) were consecutively treated with PCCP. Two patients died and were excluded from this study. Patients’ age ranged between 58 and 93 (average 86, median 80). Follow-up was between 6 to 20 months (average 12). All patients were operated on a standard fracture table with the use of posterior reduction device. An attempt to reduce the fracture was done in each case prior to the surgical incision. In the majority of cases the shaft was displaced medially to the greater trochanter. The PCCP plate was introduced percutaneously and the medially displaced shaft was pulled to the plate using the reduction clamp. The rest of the procedure was done according to the regular technique of the PCCP. All patients were instructed to refrain from weight bearing for six weeks after the surgery and then resume full weigh bearing. Follow-up was in the out patient clinic 6 weeks, 3 months and one year after the surgery. Results: Time of surgery varied between 35 to 75 minutes. There were no patients who were planned to undergo this procedure and were diverted to a different modality of fixation. All the procedures were done percutaneously. Anatomic or near anatomic reduction was achieved in all cases. All patients resumed full weigh bearing six weeks after the surgery. All but one fracture united. The patient whose fracture did not unite was blind and fell a few times during rehabilitation and eventually suffered from pull-out of the plate from the femur with breakage of the shaft screws. She underwent revision surgery with bone graft and the fracture united. Follow-up radiograms showed that the reduction was maintained in all but three patients. Medial displacement of 8–15 mm occurred in 3 patients. There were no infections. Conclusions: While there is an ongoing debate among “nailers” vs. “platers” for the fixation of femoral neck fractures, PCCP combines the theoretical advantages of both percutaneous technique and absolute stability. In this study this biological system was found to be a reliable solution for the challenging fixation of reversed oblique (AO-31A3) subtrochanteric fractures, with high union rate, fast recovery and low complication rate


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 247 - 247
1 May 2006
Robinson C Houshian S Khan L
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to prospectively audit the functional outcome and peri-operative complications associated with the use of a trochantericentry cephalomedullary nail to treat all low-energy subtrochanteric fractures. Methods: Over a 95 month period, we used the Long Gamma Nail (LGN) to treat a consecutive series of 302 locally-resident patients who sustained subtrochanteric fractures during low-energy trauma. We prospectively assessed the mortality, prevalence of complications and functional outcome during the first year post-injury. We used survivorship methodology to assess the rate of re-operations and implant revision during the first year after surgery. Results: By one year, 74 patients had died, 10 were untraceable and 7 refused to participate in follow-up. The remaining 211 patients had evaluation of their functional outcome and post-operative complications during the first year post-injury. The prognosis following an operatively-treated subtrochanteric fracture was similar to other proximal femoral fractures, with a one-year mortality of 24.5%, and an increased level of social dependence, increased use of walking aids and reduction in mobility amongst survivors. Re-operation was required in 27 patients (8.9%), although only 18 patients required nail revision. On survivorship analysis, 96.8% of fractures had healed by six months post-injury, and only five patients had confirmed non-unions, which were successfully treated with autogenous bone grafting. Lag-screw mechanical failure and fractures distal to the nail were seen in twelve (4%) and five (1.7%) patients respectively; all of these fractures subsequently healed after further treatment. Deep sepsis occurred in only five (1.7%) patients. Conclusions: Subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma have similar prognosis to other proximal femoral fractures. Trochanteric-entry cephalomedullary nails are a versatile treatment option for these injuries, and are associated with an acceptable rate of peri-operative complications and favourable functional outcome


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 128 - 129
1 Jul 2002
Sharpe I Talbot N Schranz P
Full Access

We present a retrospective clinical and radiological review to assess the use of the AO unreamed femoral nail and spiral blade in the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. Treatment of the subtrochanteric fracture remains a challenge. A combination of high stress concentration, poor cortical bone quality and comminution leads to a high incidence of problems. The abovementioned implant has been recommended for use in such fractures. However, several authors have reported mechanical failure and spiral blade migration. We have used the unreamed femoral nail since 1996 in 65 femoral fractures, and of these 32 were subtrochanteric fractures. A retrospective clinical and radiological study was undertaken to assess the use of the implant. Clinical notes and radiographs were obtained for patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with the AO unreamed femoral nail from November 1996 to November 1999. Fracture pattern was classified according to Seinsheimer. Assessments were made of callus formation and fracture healing. Any complication or implant failure was noted. Thirty-two patients required an unreamed femoral nail. There were 20 females and 12 males, with an average age of 75 years. There were 16 fractures due to a fall, 15 pathological fractures, and one due to a car accident. Classification was: Type I: 6; Type II: 13; Type III: 6; Type IV: 3; Type V: 1. Mean follow-up was five months (range 3 to 18). Eight deaths occurred within one month. There were two pain-free non-unions, one revision with bone graft for non-union, and one spiral blade back out. No breakage of implants occurred. We found that this implant provides stable fixation in these difficult fractures if adequate reduction is obtained. We have not experienced the implant failures reported in other series. We recommend the use of the implant, especially in those patients who are elderly or have pathological fractures


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 302 - 302
1 May 2010
Karatzas G Nikolopoulos D Kritas D Fasoulas A Michos I
Full Access

Purpose: To present/evaluate the results of ‘intramedullary hip screw’ (IMHS) for treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the hip. Materials and Methods: Between 2003–2005 fifty four (54) patients aged 62–92 years old (average: 77,3 yrs) with subtrochanteric fractures of the hip were treated in our department with intramedullary hip screw (IMHS). Thirty one (31) patients were women and twenty three (23) were men. Thirty (30) fractures were located in the right hip and the remaining twenty four (24) in the left one. All patients were operated by the same surgical team –within 3 days from injury in the 86% of the cases. The duration of the procedure was between 55–75 minutes. Post-op, the patients were mobilized early with -at least–partial weight bearing and they were followed-up -clinically and radiologicallly for 7–30 months. Results: 85% of the fractures were united within 14 weeks uneventfully. In seven cases, bone grafts were used. Three (3) cases of superficial wound inflammation and two case of haematoma were noticed. All above cases were treated successfully. Neither femur’s fractures (near or distal to the tip of IMHS) nor failure of implants were noticed. The 75% of patients achieved the pre-op status of rehabilitation. Conclusions: The results of this study show that ‘intramedullary hip screw’ (IMHS) seems to be a reliable treatment for the subtrochanteric fractures of the hip; and it could be considered as one of treatment of choice for them


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Dec 2020
Scattergood SD Fletcher JWA Mehendale SA Mitchell SR
Full Access

Infected non-unions of proximal femoral fractures are difficult to treat. If debridement and revision fixation is unsuccessful, staged revision arthroplasty may be required. Non-viable tissue must be resected, coupled with the introduction of an antibiotic-eluting temporary spacer prior to definitive reconstruction. Definitive tissue microbiological diagnosis and targeted antibiotic therapy are required. In cases of significant proximal femoral bone loss, spacing options are limited. We present a case of a bisphosphonate-induced subtrochanteric fracture that progressed to infected non-union. Despite multiple washouts and two revision fixations, the infection remained active with an unfavourable antibiogram. The patient required staged revision arthroplasty including a proximal femoral resection. To enable better function by maintaining leg length and offset, a custom-made antibiotic-eluting articulating temporary spacer, the Cement-a-TAN, was fabricated. Using a trochanteric entry cephalocondylar nail as a scaffold, bone cement was moulded in order to fashion an anatomical, patient-specific, proximal femoral spacer. Following resolution of the infection, the Cement-a-TAN was removed and a proximal femoral arthroplasty was successfully performed. Cement-a-TAN is an excellent temporary spacing technique in staged proximal femoral replacement for infected non-union of the proximal femur where there has been significant bone loss. It preserves mobility and maintains leg length, offset and periarticular soft-tissue tension


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVIII | Pages 130 - 130
1 Sep 2012
Desai SJ Sanders DW Wood K Bryant D
Full Access

Purpose. Blood transfusions cause morbidity and complications in hip fracture patients. This includes increased risk of bacterial infection, potentially increased mortality, and higher hospital costs. Factors such as delay from admission to surgery, fracture pattern, method of fixation, operating time, age, and gender, may affect transfusion requirements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patient and operative factors on blood loss and transfusion requirements. Method. A retrospective analysis of 631 hip fracture patients between October 2005 and February 2010 was performed. Patients were reviewed for demographics, fracture type, fixation method, delay from admission to surgery and operating time. Patients receiving post operative blood transfusions were recorded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a relationship between all independent variables and transfusion requirements. Results. Six hundred thirty one patients met the studys inclusion criteria. There were 455 women (72.1%) and 176 men (27.9%) with a mean age of 81.6 years. There were 333 femoral neck, 252 intertrochanteric and 46 subtrochanteric fractures. The mean delay from admission to surgery was 48 hours and 54 minutes, and the average operating time was 62 minutes. Binary logistic regression revealed that delay from admisson to operation increases risk for transfusion (p<0.05). There is a 10% increased risk for every 8 hours waiting for surgery (p<0.05). Patients with subtrochanteric fractures had a higher incidence of transfusion (60.6%) compared to femoral neck (21.1%) and intertrochanteric fracture (46.3%) (p<0.05). The risk of receiving a transfusion for males was 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.81) (p<0.05). Average preoperative hemoglobin in patient who required transfusion was lower, 112.614.4 vs. 124.614.1 (p<0.05). There was a 1.60 times the risk of receiving a transfusion for every 10g/L reduction in preoperative Hb. There was no correlation between operating time and method of fixation with transfusion requirement. Conclusion. Delay from admission to operation is a predictor for post operative transfusion requirement. Other risk factors include pre-operative haemoglobin, subtrochanteric fracture, age and female gender. This study suggests that decreasing delay will decrease transfusion requirements, which will decrease risk of infection, decrease hospital costs and potentially decrease mortality


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 54 - 54
1 May 2021
Debuka E Wilson G Philpott M Thorpe P Narayan B
Full Access

Introduction. IM (Intra Medullary) nail fixation is the standard treatment for diaphyseal femur fractures and also for certain types of proximal and distal femur fractures. Despite the advances in the tribology for the same, cases of failed IM nail fixation continue to be encountered routinely in clinical practice. Common causes are poor alignment or reduction, insufficient fixation and eventual implant fatigue and failure. This study was devised to study such patients presenting to our practice and develop a predictive model for eventual failure. Materials and Methods. 57 patients who presented with failure of IM nail fixation (± infection) between Jan 2011 – Jun 2020 were included in the study and hospital records and imaging reviewed. Those fixed with any other kinds of metalwork were excluded. Classification for failure of IM nails – Type 1: Failure with loss of contact of lag screw threads in the head due to backing out and then rotational instability, Type 2A: Failure of the nail at the nail and lag screw junction, Type 2B: Failure of the screws at the nail lag screw junction, Type 3: Loosening at the distal locking sites with or without infection. X-rays reviewed and causes/site of failure noted. Results. Total patients - 57. Demography - Average age - 58.9 years, 22 Males and 35 females. Eleven patients were noted to have an infection at the fracture site that needed oral or IV antibiotics.16 patients - at least 1 cerclage wire for fracture reduction and fixation + IM Nail. Subtrochanteric fractures (42/57) were the most common to fail. In those fractures with postero-medial comminution, locking of the lag screw in position thus preventing backout can prevent failure. In type 2 failures, preventing varus fixation by early open reduction and temporary fixation with plates and screws can achieve improved results. Those with type 3 failures with periosteal reaction should be considered to be infected until proven otherwise. Conclusions. This classification for failure of IM nails in the femur can be used as a predictive model for failures and allow early recognition and intervention to tackle them


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 14 - 14
1 Mar 2005
Wisniewski T Muballe B
Full Access

In a retrospective study, we reviewed 45 peri-trochanteric fractures treated between April 1995 and November 2002. The mean age of the 24 men and 21 women was 71 years (57 to 91). There were 34 inter-subtrochanteric, four reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures and nine subtrochanteric fractures. On the AO classification, there were 11 type-31A2-2, 21 type-31A2-3 and four type-31A3-1 intertrochanteric fractures. The fracture extended into the femoral neck in one case and into the diaphysis in three. Cardiopulmonary diseases were present in more than 60% of patients. In most cases, fractures were reduced by closed reduction or reduction through a short incision. In 42 cases, a Smith and Nephew femoral reconstruction nail was used. Three fractures were stabilised with AO undreamed femoral nail with spiral blade. Distal locking screws were inserted in all cases. Progressive passive hip and knee movement was introduced from day one postoperatively. Partial weight-bearing was permitted from the onset. All but two fractures healed within 3 to 6 months. Union was delayed in two subtrochanteric fractures. Functional hip and knee movement was present in all patients. There was no sepsis. Proximal screws backed out in four cases, but this was of no functional significance. In one case the superior proximal screw was too long and required removal. In one case screws backed out of the femoral neck and further surgery was required. No breakage of screws or nail was observed. Inter-subtrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in the elderly may be successfully managed with intramedullary femoral reconstruction nails