Cementless stem fixation is a widely used method of stem revision in North America and elsewhere in the world. There is abundant literature in its support. Most of the reports from 1985 to 2005 related to proximally or extensively porocoated designs, the former falling into disfavor with time because of unpredictable outcomes. With few exceptions (eg S-ROM) the modularity of these designs was limited to the head/neck junction. But this generation of designs was associated with some issues such as insertional fractures, limited control of anteversion (and risk of dislocation), limited applicability in the setting of severe bone loss (Paprosky Type 4 osteolysis or Vancouver Type B3 periprosthetic fracture), as well as ongoing concern relating to severe proximal stress shielding.

In the past decade we have seen the mounting use of a new design concept: tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), which incorporate the advantages of titanium (for less flexural rigidity), conical taper (for vertical taper-lock stability), longitudinal ribs and flutes (for rotational stability), and surface preparation which attracts bone on growth for long term fixation.

Four consecutive reports from our center have documented the superiority of the TFTS in our hands, with encouraging outcomes even when dealing with severe bone loss or periprosthetic fractures. There is an increasing body of other literature which reports a similar experience. Furthermore, with increasing experience and confidence in this design, we now use a monoblock or non-modular design in greater than 95% of cases in which a TFTS is indicated at our center. This circumvents the potential drawbacks of stem modularity, including taper corrosion and taper junction fracture.

Introduction:

Severe bone loss creates a challenge for fixation in femoral revision. The goal of the study was to assess reproducibility of fixation and clinical outcomes of femoral revision with bone loss using a modular, fluted, tapered distally fixing stem.

Introduction

Studies have documented encouraging results with the use of fluted, tapered, modular, titanium stems in revision hip arthroplasty with bone loss. However, radiographic signs of osseointegration and patterns of reconstitution have not been previously categorized.

Objective: Revision total hip arthroplasty in cases of proximal femoral bone loss due to osteolysis and loosening is challenging for surgeon and implants. The use of tapered fluted modular titanium femoral stem in these situations may offer the advantage of better biomechanical reconstruction with a design that ensure primary stability and promotes bone integration.

Method: We studied retrospectively 83 cases of femoral reconstruction with the PFM-R stem. Paprosky classification was used to qualify bone defects on preoperative radiological evaluation. Demographic, clinical and intraoperative data were collected, along with any complications. Clinical (W.O.M.A.C. function score) and radiological follow-up was performed at a minimum of 12 months.

Results: The mean follow-up was 44 months (23 to 66 months). Five patients were lost to follow-up. 48% of patients had at least one previous revision. The mean post operative WOMAC score was 83. 91% of patients had no significant limb length discrepancy. Stabilization or regression of osteolytic lesions was observed in 75% of revised femur. Complications were 8 dislocations, 7 fractures and 3 infections. A correlation was found between the risk of dislocation and the number of previous revision surgery. Out of 14 cases revised for infection, one had a recurrence.

Discussion: This study confirmed the benefits of the PFM-R stem in difficult femoral revision in term of limb length equalization, stability of fixation, regression of osteolytic lesions and improved clinical function.

To review the results of revision THR performed with a modular titanium tapered uncemented stem in two cohorts of patients to assess whether subsidence of this type of stem is avoidable through improved surgical technique.

The first 70 patients undergoing revision THR with this type of stem were compared with 38 patients who had their revision in the last 24 months and had a minium follow up of 12 months., with particular reference to stem subsidence. All patients were also assessed with the Oxford Hip Score. All radiographs were reviewed to measure subsidence. Identical post-operative management was used in both groups.

The mean subsidence in the first group was 11.7 mm and in the most recent group 4mm. The Oxford Hip Score in both groups was similar (20.9) which compares very favourably with the OHS score from the National joint Register for revision arthroplasty (24.3).

This comparison shows that changes in surgical technique can limit the subsidence seen with tapered stems used in revision total hip replacement. No bone grafts were used in either series, only small changes in bone preparation, and prosthesis selection were used .The outcome as determined by the OHS was similar in both groups.

Background: Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating is widely used for total hip arthroplasty as it has been suggested to improve implant ingrowth and long-term stability. However, the evidence behind the use of HA in femoral stems is ambiguous.

Methods: We investigated a non-cemented, tapered titanium femoral stem that was available either with or without HA coating. This stem had been used in 3,116 total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in 2,608 patients registered in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (1992–2007). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a Cox regression model including type of coating, age, sex, primary diagnosis, and the type of cup fixation were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RR) of the risk for revision for various reasons.

Results: 63.7% of the stems were coated with HA, 36.3% were uncoated. It was found that the investigated HA-coated stem had an excellent 10-year survivorship of 97.7% (95% CI 96.5–98.9), and that the stem without HA coating had a 10-year survivorship of 97.6% (95% CI 96.2–99.0) when revision due to any reason was defined as the endpoint. There was no significant difference between these two groups (p> 0.05, log rank Mantel-Cox). A Cox regression model showed that the presence of HA coating did not significantly influence the risk of stem revision due to any reason (RR 1.3; 95% CI 0.7–2.4), or due to aseptic loosening (RR 1.0; 95% CI 0.3–3.4). The risk for revision due to infection, dislocation, or fracture was also not affected by the presence of HA coating.

Interpretation: Our results show HA coating of this non-cemented tapered stem with excellent 10-year survivorship does not affect the risk for revision. The assumed beneficial effect of HA coating of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty is thus questionable.