Osteotomies in the musculoskeletal system are joint preserving procedures to correct the alignment of the patient. In the lower limb, most of the pre-operative planning is performed on full leg weightbearing radiographs. However, these images contain a 2-dimensional projection of a 3-dimensional deformity, lack a clear visualization of the joint surface and are prone to rotational errors during patient positioning. Weightbearing CT imaging has demonstrated to overcome these shortcomings during the first applications of this device at level of the foot and ankle. Recent advances allow to scan the entire lower limb and novel applications at the level of the knee and hip are on the rise. Here, we will demonstrated the current techniques and 3-dimensional measurements used in supra- and inframalleolar osteotomies around the ankle. Several of these techniques will be transposed to other parts in the lower limb to spark future studies in this field

One-fourth of all ankle trauma involve injury to the syndesmotic ankle complex, which may lead to syndesmotic instability and/or posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis in the long term if left untreated. The diagnosis of these injuries still poses a deceitful challenge, as MRI scans lack physiologic weightbearing and plain weightbearing radiographs are subject to beam rotation and lack 3D information. Weightbearing cone-beam CT (WBCT) overcomes these challenges by imaging both ankles during bipedal stance, but ongoingdebate remains whether these should be taken under weightbearing conditions and/or during application of external rotation stress. The aim of this study is study therefore to compare both conditions in the assessment of syndesmotic ankle injuries using WBCT imaging combined with 3D measurement techniques. In this retrospective study, 21 patients with an acute ankle injury were analyzed using a WBCT. Patients with confirmed syndesmotic ligament injury on MRI were included, while fracture associated syndesmotic injuries were excluded. WBCT imaging was performed in weightbearing and combined weightbearing-external rotation. In the latter, the patient was asked to internally rotate the shin until pain (VAS>8/10) or a maximal range of motion was encountered. 3D models were developed from the CT slices, whereafter. The following 3D measurements were calculated using a custom-made Matlab® script; Anterior tibiofibular distance (AFTD), Alpha angle, posterior Tibiofibular distance (PFTD) and Talar rotation (TR) in comparison to the contralateral non-injured ankle. The difference in neutral-stressed Alpha angle and AFTD were significant between patients with a syndesmotic ankle lesion and contralateral control (P=0.046 and P=0.039, respectively). There was no significant difference in neutral-stressed PFTD and TR angle. Combined weightbearing-external rotation during CT scanning revealed an increased AFTD in patients with syndesmotic ligament injuries. Based on this study, application of external rotation during WBCT scans could enhance the diagnostic accuracy of subtle syndesmotic instability

Acute syndesmotic ankle injuries continue to impose a diagnostic dilemma and it remains unclear whether weighbearing or external rotation should be exerted rotation during the imaging process. Therefore, we aimed to implement both axial load (weightbearing) and external rotation in the assessment of a clinical cohort of patients with syndesmotic ankle injuries syndesmotic using weightbearing CT imaging. In this retrospective comparative cohort study, patients with an acute syndesmotic ankle injury were analyzed using a WBCT (N= 20; Mean age= 31,64 years; SD= 14,07. Inclusion criteria were an MRI confirmed syndesmotic ankle injury imaged by a bilateral WBCT of the ankle during weightbearing and combined weightbearing-external rotation. Exclusion criteria consisted of fracture associated syndesmotic ankle injuries. Three-dimensional (3D) models were generated from the CT slices. Tibiofibular displacement and Talar Rotation was quantified using automated3D measurements (Anterior TibioFibular Distance (ATFD), Alpha Angle, Posterior TibioFibular Distance (PTFD) and Talar Rotation (TR) Angle) in comparison to a cohort of non-injured ankles.

Applications of weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) imaging in the foot and ankle have emerged over the past decade. However, the potential diagnostic benefits are scattered across the literature, and a concise overview is currently lacking. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review all reported diagnostic applications per anatomical region in the foot and ankle. A systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search terms consisted of “weightbearing/standing CT and ankle, hind-, mid- or forefoot”. English language studies analyzing the diagnostic applications of WBCT were included. Studies were excluded if they simulated weightbearing CT, described normal subjects, included cadaveric samples or samples were case reports. The modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was applied for quality assessment. The added value was defined as the review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in the Prospero database (CRD42019106980). A total of 48 studies (prospective N=8, retrospective N=36, cohort study N=1, diagnostic N=2, prognostic comparative study N=1) were found to be eligible for review. The following diagnostic applications were identified per anatomical area in the foot: ankle (osteoarthritis N=5, ligament injury N=6); hindfoot (deformity N=9); midfoot (Lisfranc injury N=2, flatfoot deformity N=13, osteoarthritis N=1); forefoot (hallux valgus N=12). The identified studies contained diagnostic applications that could not be used on plain radiographs. The mean MINORS equaled 10.1 on a total of 16 (range: 8 to 12). Diagnostic applications of weightbearing CT imaging are most frequently studied in hindfoot deformity, but other area's areas are on the rise. Post-processing of images was identified as the main added value compared to WBRX. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution as the average quality score was moderate. Therefore, future prospective studies are warranted to consolidate the role of WBCT in diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.

Background

Weightbearing computed tomography scans allow for better understanding of foot alignment in patients with Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity. However, soft tissue integrity cannot be assessed via WBCT. As performing both WBCT and magnetic resonance imaging is not cost effective, we aimed to assess whether there is an association between specific WBCT and MRI findings.

Introduction

Pes cavovarus is a foot deformity that can be idiopathic (I-PC) or acquired secondary to other pathology. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common adult cause for acquired pes cavovarus deformity (CMT-PC). The foot morphology of these distinct patient groups has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study was to assess if morphological differences exist between CMT-PC, I-PC and normal feet (controls) using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT).

Introduction:. Cone Based CT (CBCT) scanning uses a point source and a planar detector with parallel data acquisition and volumetric coverage of the area of interest. The pedCAT (Curvebeam USA) scanner is marketed as a low radiation dose, compact, faster and inexpensive CT scanner that can be used to obtain both non- weightbearing and true 3 dimensional weightbearing views. Method:. A review of the first 100 CBCT scanning in our unit has been performed to assess ease of scanning, imaging time, radiation dose and value of imaging as opposed to conventional imaging. Results:. A pedcat CT scan was available within minutes of the request, similar to plain radiographs but much earlier than a 6 week delay for a patient to attend a new appointment for a conventional CT. All patients returned to see the clinician for a clinical decision in the same NHS clinic and did not require a new clinic visit; illustrative cases include fracture/subluxation detection, surgical planning, extent of arthritis and 3D assessment of union of arthrodeses. All patients were able to transfer to the scanner with ease and the imaging time was 10 times than a conventional CT. The radiation dose to the patients was 9% that of a full gantry system. Weightbearing CT scanning enabled a 3D evaluation of reduction of joint space and ankle/hindfoot alignment. Anterior ankle and sesamoid impingement have been diagnosed in patients with previously obscure pain. Conclusion:. 3D Cone Beam imaging has been found to be easily accessible, rapidly performed and safer to the patient in providing a lower radiation dose. Weightbearing 3D imaging provides additional diagnostic information