Despite the in-depth research into the treatment of acute septic arthritis of the knee, the morbidity and mortality are still significant. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of a treatment protocol including arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in resolving septic arthritis of the knee. During a 6-year period, 18 patients presenting with septic arthritis of the knee were included in this study. In 10 cases, septic arthritis occurred after knee arthroscopy, in 2 after open trauma, in 2 more after joint aspiration or injection; there were 2 hematogenous infections and 2 following contiguous spread from an adjacent site. The patients were treated with an arthroscopic debridement protocol consisting of (1) arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy, (2) suction drainage for 24 hours, (3) repeat arthroscopy for persisting clinical and laboratory findings and (4) antibiotics IV for four weeks and per.os. for two months (ciprofloxacin – rifampicin). The onset of the symptoms presented 18.2 days in average after the cause. The patients complained of swelling (18/18), fever ~39° C (16/18), stiffness (13/18), pain (12/18), erythema (6/18) and weakness (6/18). Arthroscopic drainage (average 1.5 procedures) was performed at an average of 8.4 days from the initiation of the symptoms. Laboratory data revealed elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) (average 68.9), CRP (average: 10.9) and WBC (average: 8894.3). The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years. Cultures from knee joint aspirations were negative in 9 cases. Five knees were infected with Staphylococcus aureus, 2 with Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1 with Escherichia Coli and 1 with multiple organisms. One month after the last arthroscopic debridement, the ESR and CRP levels were normalised in all cases. Lysholm scores averaged 91. Most of the patients (15/18) returned to their pre-infection level of functioning. Overall success in clinical eradication of infection was 100%. Our conclusions are:. early aggressive arthroscopic debridement as part of a treatment protocol can be an effective treatment option,. time is a crucial factor, and. the earlier the arthroscopic debridement is performed, the better results are obtained

Introduction: Arthroscopy to debride osteochondral lesions (OCL) of the talus is an accepted procedure with a good outcome in 70–80% of subjects. The minority of subjects that do not do well present a problem. Further arthroscopy and debridement procedures have been assumed to yield poor results and this has been used as justification for cartilage transplantation. The evidence for this is lacking. Methods: In our unit the routine procedure for OCL is arthroscopic debridement. If this fails a further arthroscopic debridement is performed. We identified all subjects who had had a repeat procedure for failed arthroscopic debridement of an OCL by the senior author and reviewed them clinically. The outcome was scored using the AOFAS hind foot and ankle scoring system. Results: Between 1993 and 2002 808 ankle arthroscopies were performed of which 215 were to treat OCLs. Of these 12 had repeat arthroscopies because of a poor outcome. AOFAS scores improved from a mean of 34.8 to 80.5 at a mean follow up of 5.9 years (range 18 months – 11 years). One subject had already undergone a cartilage transplantation procedure because of a poor outcome. The other 11 subjects scored themselves as fair or good and had returned to previous levels of activity, including two professional sportsmen. It was clear by 6 months in all subjects that their symptoms were significantly improved following the second procedure. Conclusions: This is the first series specifically assessing subjects who have had repeat arthroscopic debridement of OCLs of the talus. Our results disprove the assumption that repeat arthroscopic debridement yield poor results. It provides benchmark results at medium term follow up for cartilage transplantation to be compared to

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) is a challenging clinical problem in young patients. Given the possibility of early glenoid component loosening in this population with total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and subsequent need for early revision, alternative treatment options are often recommended to provide pain relief and improved range of motion. While nonoperative modalities including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and physical therapy focusing on rotator cuff strengthening and scapular stabilization may provide some symptomatic relief, young patients with glenohumeral OA often need surgery for improved outcomes. Joint preserving techniques, such as arthroscopic debridement with removal of loose bodies and capsular release, with or without biceps tenotomy or tenodesis, remains a viable nonarthroplasty option in these patients. Clinical studies evaluating the outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for glenohumeral OA in young patients have had favorable outcomes. Evidence suggests that earlier stages of glenohumeral OA have more favorable outcomes with arthroscopic debridement procedures, with worse outcomes being observed in patients with complete joint space loss and bipolar chondral lesions. More advanced arthroscopic options include inferior osteophyte excision and axillary neurolysis or microfracture of chondral lesions, both of which have demonstrated favorable early clinical outcomes. Patients with some preserved joint space and small osteophytes can avoid arthroplasty and have improved functional outcomes after arthroscopic debridement for glenohumeral OA. Caution should be advised when indicating this procedure for patients with large osteophytes, grade IV bipolar lesions, biconcave glenoids, and complete loss of joint space

Symptomatic isolated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint arthritis affects approximately 10% of the population. Involvement of the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint occurs in 15–30% of all degenerate wrists. Investigation of the technique of arthroscopic debridement of this joint was undertaken to assess the symptom relief achieved and record any resulting postoperative morbidity which limits the success of other techniques used for this condition. Ten consecutive patients with persistent symptoms were assessed prospectively by a research nurse. Measurements of range of motion and grip strength were obtained before and after surgery. Visual analogue scores for pain and satisfaction levels were also recorded and any limitation to activities of daily living was noted. Assessment included clinical examination for local tenderness over the STT joint. Good or excellent subjective results were achieved in nine patients at final review at an average of 36 (12–65) months after arthroscopic debridement. One patient graded the result as fair due to failure to achieve normal range of motion. All patients described significant reduction in visual analogue pain scores from an average of 86.5 to 14.1 points. The Green and O’Brien wrist scores improved from a mean of 63.2 to 91.2 during the same time frame. Eight of the patients were in employment and returned to work at 3 months post-surgery without the use of any external splints. The wrist scores were maintained in the five patients reviewed at least three years post-operation. Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement is simple, safe and effective when compared with other treatment modalities, achieving excellent pain relief and restoration in function in the short term in patients with isolated idiopathic STT arthritis. Longer term follow-up is no doubt required

Arthroscopic debridement and pinning is not considered to be effective in dynamic scapholunate (SL) instability treated more than three months post injury; open procedures (capsulodesis, tenondesis, SL ligament reconstruction, intercarpal fusions) are preferred for these patients. The best procedure for this problem is yet to be determined. A restrospective review of the senior author’s records produced thirteen patients with late presenting dynamic SL instability who were unwilling to undergo an open procedure and were treated initially with aggressive arthroscopic debridement and pinning. The mid-term results of this approach are presented. Eleven of the initial thirteen patients were available for follow-up. Their mean age was 36 years (range 23–50) and the mean time elapsed from injury was 7 months (range 4.5–10). The diagnosis of dynamic SL instability was based on a positive Watson’s test, SL gapping on grip view radiographs and arthroscopic findings of a Geissler type III (in 5 patients) or type IV (in 6 patients) SL tear. The SL angle was under 550 in all patients. The procedure included aggressive arthroscopic debridement of the torn portion of the SL ligament to bleeding bone in an effort to induce scar formation in the SL interval. The SL interval was subsequently reduced and pinned (with 2 pins through the SL and one pin in the scaphocapitate joint) under fluoroscopy. The pins were removed at a mean of 9.6 weeks (range 8–14). The mean follow-up was 36 months (range 12–76). Three patients were re-operated at 9, 10 and 11 months after the initial procedure. Re-operations included a dorsal capsulodesis, a four-corner fusion and a wrist arthrodesis. The eight remaining patients achieved two excellent, four good, one fair and one poor result with the Mayo wrist score. Patients diagnosed with Geissler III tears were found to be younger and achieved better final wrist score (mean 86 points versus 76 points in patients with Geissler IV tears). Two pin track infections were treated conservatively. Late (more than three months post injury) arthroscopic debridement and pinning was found to be only moderately successful for dynamic SL instability (6 out of 11 patients achieved a good or excellent result without re-operation). This approach, however, does not preclude subsequent open surgery. It is best suited for patients with Geissler type III tears (not a gross drive through sign) who are unwilling to undergo an extensive open procedure provided they understand the risks and benefits of this approach

Purpose. There is minimal information on outcome of glenohumeral debridement for treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of this procedure with or without acromioplasty /resection of clavicle in subjective perception of disability and functional range of motion and strength at one year following surgery. Method. Prospectively collected data of patients with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint who were not good candidates for shoulder arthroplasty due to young age, high activity level, or desire to avoid major surgery at the time of assessment were included. Arthroscopic debridement included removal of loose bodies, chondral flaps, and degenerative tissue. Resection of the lateral end of the clavicle or acromioplasty was performed as clinically indicated for management of osteoarthritis of the Acromioclavicular (AC) joint or subacromial impingement respectively. Disability at 12 months following surgery was measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment form, Constant-Murley score (CMS), strength, and painfree range of motion in four directions. Results. Sixty-seven patients (mean age= 57, SD: 15 (range: 25–87), range: 35–86, 35 females, 32 males) were included in analysis. The average symptom duration was 5 years. Fifteen (22%) patients had left shoulder involvement with 37 (55%) having right shoulder problem and 15(22%) reporting bilateral complaints. The right shoulder was operated on in 41 (61%) patients. Fifty two (78%) patients had an associated subacromial decompression [49 (73%) had acromioplasty and 27 (40%) had resection of the lateral end of the clavicle with some procedures overlapping]. Paired student t-tests showed a statistically significant improvement in scores of ASES and CMS (p<0.001) and painfree range of motion (p=0.02) at 1 year follow-up. However, no change was observed in strength (p>0.05). Conclusion. Arthroscopic debridement with or without acromioplasty /resection of the lateral end of the clavicle improves disability and painfree range of motion in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of glenohumeral joint at one year following surgery

Summary. Analysis of existing data of patients who had undergone debridement procedure for osteoarthritis (OA) of glenohumeral joint showed improvement in disability at a minimum of one year following surgery. Injured workers were significantly younger and had a poorer outcome. Introduction. There is little information on debridement for OA of the shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was to examine factors that affect the outcome of arthroscopic debridement with or without acromioplasty /resection of clavicle of patients with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, in subjective perception of disability and functional range of motion and strength at a minimum of one year following surgery. Patients and Methods. Existing data of patients with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint who had undergone debridement were used for analysis. These patients were not good candidates for shoulder arthroplasty due to a young age, high activity level, or desire to avoid major surgery at the time of assessment. Arthroscopic debridement included removal of loose bodies, chondral flaps, and degenerative tissue. Resection of the lateral end of the clavicle or acromioplasty was performed as clinically indicated for management of osteoarthritis of the Acromioclavicular (AC) joint or subacromial impingement respectively. Disability at a minimum of 12 months following surgery was measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's (ASES) assessment form, Constant-Murley score (CMS), strength, and painfree range of motion (ROM) in four directions. Impact of sex, age, having acromioplasty or resection of clavicle, and having an active work-related compensation claim was examined. Results. Seventy-four patients (mean age= 55, SD: 14 (range: 25–88), range: 35–86, 34 females, 40 males) were included in analysis. The average symptom duration was 5.8 years. Fifty nine (80%) patients had an associated subacromial decompression [55 (74%) had acromioplasty, 32(43%) had resection of the lateral end of the clavicle, and 28 (38%) had both procedures]. Nineteen (26%) patients had a work-related compensation claim related to their shoulder. This group was significantly younger than the non-compensation group (45 vs. 58, p=0.0001). Paired student t-tests showed a statistically significant improvement in scores of ASES and CMS (p<0.0001), strength (p=0.001) and painfree range of motion (p=0.01) at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. The ANCOVA model that incorporated sex, age, additional decompression (AC resection or acromioplasty), compensation claim and pre-op scores, showed that the pre-op scores and having a work-related claim were the most influential predictors of post-op scores of ASES, CMS, and ROM. The post-op strength was the only factor that was affected by sex, age and having a work-related claim. Discussion/Conclusion. Arthroscopic debridement with or without acromioplasty /resection of the lateral end of the clavicle improved disability, painfree range of motion and strength in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of glenohumeral joint at a minimum of one year following surgery. Patients with an active compensation claim related to their shoulder were significantly younger and had a poorer outcome

From October 2005 to March 2014, we performed 46 arthroscopic surgeries for painful knee after knee arthroplasty. We excluded 16 cases for this study such as, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, infection, patellar clunk syndrome, patellofemoral synovial hyperplasia, aseptic loosening, and follow-up period after arthroscopic surgery less than 6 months. Thirty cases matched the criteria. They had knee pain longer than 6 months after initial total knee arthroplasty (TKA), they had marked tenderness at medial and/or lateral tibiofemoral joint space, and also they complained walking pain with or without resting pain. Twenty one cases had initial TKA at our institute. In consideration of total number of TKA (n=489) in the period at our institute, incident rate of painful knee after initial TKA was 4.3%. Of 30 cases, 3 cases were male, and 27 cases were female. Types of implant were 4 in cruciate retaining type, 1 in cruciate substituting type, and 25 in posterior stabilized type. Age at the arthroscopy was 72 years old (51–87 years old), and period form initial TKA to pain perception was 18 months(1 – 144 months), and period from initial TKA to arthroscopic surgery was 29 months (6 – 125 months), and follow-up period after arthroscopy was 36 months (6 – 93 months). All arthroscopic debridement were performed through 3 portals, anteromedial, anterolateral, and proximal superomedial portal. Scar tissue impingements more than 5 mm wide were found in 87% of the cases both medial and lateral femorotibial joint spaces. Infrapatellar fat pad were covered with whitish scar tissue in all cases, and the scar tissue were connecting with the scar tissue which found at medial or lateral femorotibial joint spaces. We removed all scar tissue with motorized shaver or punches. At final follow-up, complete pain free in 63%, marked improvement in 3%, half improvement in 20%, slight improvement in 3%, and no change in 10% of the cases. Previously in the literatures, two reasons of the pain after total knee arthroplasty had been reported, patellar clunk syndrome, and patellar synovial hyperplasia. All cases reported this study had marked tenderness at tibiofemoral joint space. It was difficult to explain the tenderness by previously reported pathological mechanisms. We had to find another pathological mechanism to explain the pain of our cases. Painful knee due to scar tissue formation known as “infrapatellar contracture syndrome” after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery was previously reported. We hypothesized similar scar tissue formation should occur after TKA that caused painful knee. Continuity of the solid scar tissue between infrapatellar fat pad with the scar tissue at tibiofemoral joint space should be the cause of impingement at femorotibial joint even small size of scar tissue. From this study, we have to recognize that painful knee after TKA is not infrequent complication. And, if we could deny infection, and aseptic loosening in painful knee after TKA, arthroscopic debridement was good option to solve the pain. We could expect improvement of the pain more than half in 87% of cases

Arthroscopic labral debridement has become and accepted mode of treatment for acetabular labral tears (ALTs) and yet results in literature are few and conflicting especially with regards presence of cartilage damage and its influence on outcome. Aim of our prospective cohort study was to look at outcome of ALTs post arthroscopic limbectomy using validated questionnaires at average of 2 years. We also looked at the sensitivity of MR arthrography in detecting ALTs and cartilage damage. Consecutive cohort of 82 patients who were suspected of having ALTs by senior author had MR arthrography followed by hip arthroscopy. All patients filled out a WOMAC, NAHS scores before and after the operation. All patients who were followed up also filled an especially designed five-point functional questionnaire. At time of arthroscopy the presence of labral tear, its position in the acetabulum and degree of cartilage damage (based on Outerbridge classification) were recorded and correlated with Mra and patient outcome. Seventy six patients were found to have a labral tear, with majority of these lesions in the anterior or antero-superior quadrant. 59% of patients were shown to have an associated degree of cartilage damage. Although overall all patients showed significant improvement in their functional scores, those with high grade cartilage damage had poorer results in comparison. We also found that patients with older age are at higher risk of requiring a THJR in the first 2 years following arthroscopy. MRa proved to a sensitive tool at detecting labral pathology but not so at identifying presence of cartilage damage. Arthroscopic debridement of ALTs in patients presenting with mechanical hip symptoms provides good functional outcome, however it should be used with caution in those with high grade articular cartilage damage and older age group where there is higher likelihood of failure

Despite widespread use, the benefit of knee arthroscopy for symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial. The theoretical benefit of removal of particulate debris and washout of inflammatory cytokines has not been supported by strong evidence. Arguments exist for its short term benefit in well selected patients. We sought to determine if arthroscopy provided any short term symptomatic relief in patients with a clinical diagnosis of OA in our unit. A total of 20 patients were listed for routine arthroscopy over a one year period for OA. Mean age was 60 (range 48–74) years and 3 in 5 patients were female. 9 patients were listed by registrars, 6 by locum consultants and 5 by substantive consultants. One procedure was cancelled on the day of surgery due to lack of indication, with 19 knees proceeding to surgery. There was evidence of significant arthritis in 17 knees, 6 of which had associated degenerate meniscus tears. Two knees had meniscus tears without significant arthritis. All patients had washout and debridement and in addition, 8 partial menisectomies were carried out together with 3 loose body removals. Patients were followed up after an average of 12 weeks. The 2 patients (both male, mean age 52) with meniscus tears in the absence of significant arthritis fully recovered. Both had symptoms of true locking. 2 patients with loose bodies also fully recovered. With the exception of 2 patients with partial relief, the remainder had no symptomatic relief. One reported a worsening of symptoms and progressed to total knee arthroplasty. These results suggest that arthroscopic debridement and washout plays a limited role in the short term symptomatic relief of OA. Surgeons should limit its use to younger patients with mild radiographic disease and true mechanical symptoms who are otherwise unsuitable for arthroplasty and not keen on undergoing joint conserving surgery

Purpose: The role of arthroscopic treatment for degenerative knee joint disease remains controversial. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement and to establish its indication for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in patients aged less than 50 years. Material and methods: Arthroscopic debridement was performed from 1994 to 2002 in 192 patients, 72 men and 120 women, mean age 59 years (51–75). We noted clinical history, particularly conditions contraindicating major surgery, and prior lower limb trauma, particularly involving the same knee. Patient weight and activity level were considered. The preoperative work-up included a functional examination (Freeman), and a radiographic study used to class the osteoarthritis as early, moderate or advanced and measure the knee axis. We performed joint wash out in all cases associated with different debridement procedures. Chondropathy was evaluated with the Marshall classification. A new functional evaluation and subjective evaluation was performed at last follow-up. Results: Severe disease was present in the history of 5.2% of the knees; 9.3% had had prior surgery and 82% presented moderate osteoarthritis, mainly involving all three compartments. Type II or III chondropathy was found in 92% of knees. At mean follow-up of 28 months (5–108), the mean function score improved from 69.4/110 preoperatively to 89.5/110 and 75.4% of patients considered their knee had improved. Five patients required secondary arthroplasty. Poor outcome was associated with type III or IV chondroplasty involving the three compartments and the presence of the mentioned history. Age was not correlated with poor outcome. Discussion: We studied a population with overt osteoarthritis who were treated with a minimally aggressive method, mainly for palliation. Only 2.6% underwent total arthroplasty after arthroscopic treatment. There was a clear improvement in function, mainly pain relief. The large majority of the patients were satisfied with the outcome and did not require further medical treatment except occasionally. The less satisfactory results were obtained in patients with more advanced disease who could not undergo arthroplasty because of concomitant medical conditions

Background: Ankle sprains are common with the majority resolving with simple measures. Some patients may have residual pain and instability caused by functional instability. Intraarticular scar formation has been implicated in these patients. Few studies have shown the effectiveness of arthroscopic procedure in treatment of this condition. Aim: Our aim was to assess the role of arthroscopy in functional instability of the ankle. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of case-notes of patients who presented with functional ankle instability from 2005 – 2007 who had failed a trial of conservative therapy and who had ankle arthroscopy, provided there was no true instability as determined by EUA and stress xrays. Results: Out of 77 patients with a mean age of 38.1, 5 patients had true mechanical instability. They underwent open repair of the lateral ligaments and were excluded from the study. 21 had steroid injections which gave temporary improvement in 11 of them but eventually all of the 72 remaining stable patients underwent ankle arthroscopy. 67 (76.7%) had significant amounts of scar tissue present which needed debridement, most commonly in the antero- lateral corner (58.3%). 52 patients improved (72.2%), 20 patients (27.8%) did not improve. 2 patients suffered a superficial wound infection. 17 patients had an osteochondral talar lesion. Of these, 14 patients improved, 2 did not and 1 patient did not attend follow up. Outcome: Our study supports the role of arthroscopy in the treatment of functional ankle instability resistant to conservative treatment. Significant improvement in symptoms can be expected in about 70% of patients following arthroscopic debridement of scar tissue rising to approximately 90% if there is an associated talar osteo-chondral lesion. Ankle arthroscopy is associated with a low complication rate and should be offered to patients with functional instability when conservative measures have failed especially if an osteochondral lesion has been identified

There are a variety of potential causes of shoulder arthritis in young patients including osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, and avascular necrosis. However, the primary etiology in my practice is related to complications of instability surgery or labral repair: thermal or anchor/suture related chondrolysis. The outcomes of arthroscopic debridement have been disappointing in patients with shoulder arthritis with worse results with increasing severity of articular cartilage changes. Among all joint arthroplasty procedures, patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty have the youngest average age. Results of hemiarthroplasty (HA) have been approximately 75% to 80% compared to 90% with total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The largest series in the literature on shoulder arthroplasty in young patients is Schoch et al. They reviewed the results of 56 hemiarthroplasties and 19 TSA performed in patients less than 50 years old with a minimum 20-year follow-up or follow-up until reoperation. Both HA and TSA resulted in significant improvements in pain scores (p<0.001), abduction (p<0.01), and external rotation (p=0.02). Eighty-one percent of shoulders were rated much better or better than pre-operatively. Unsatisfactory ratings in HA were due to reoperations in 25 (glenoid arthrosis in 16) and limited motion, pain, or dissatisfaction in 11. Unsatisfactory ratings in TSA were due to reoperations in 6 (component loosening in 4) and limited motion in 5. Estimated 20-year survival was 75.6% (confidence interval, 65.9–86.5) for HAs and 83.2% (confidence interval, 70.5–97.8) for TSAs

The French word debridement means the removal of the foreign matter or devitalised tissue from a lesion until surrounding healthy tissue is exposed. Arthroscopic techniques facilitated the removal of the intra-articular torn menisci, loose bodies, degenerated articular cartilage, and osteophytes. However, debridement procedure itself cannot induce tissue regeneration thus, the basic goal of the procedure is relief of pain. If pain can be relieved by non-surgical means very few patients can be considered for arthroscopic management. Debridement of early osteoarthritic knees can be carried out with a minimally invasive procedure with extremely low risk of infection and morbidity. However, it should be understood that this procedure is basically indicated for early degenerative knee disease with mechanical problems such as torn menisci or flap lesion of the cartilage. The general principle is to resect and remove less tissue and preserve the anatomical structure as much as possible. For example in the case of a degenerated horizontal tear of the medial meniscus, the torn fragment can be left alone as long as the remaining segment is not unstable. Arthroscopic removal and shaving of the fibrillated articular cartilage can minimise and reduce crepitation and abnormal sensation of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral joint but the articular cartilage will not regenerate by this procedure. The longer-term knee function will be better if the anatomical structure is preserved as much as possible. With increasing awareness of the important functions of the meniscus and the improved understanding of the operative procedure, arthroscopic meniscal repair has become a widely accepted method of treatment for the symptomatic peripheral meniscal tears in the younger athletic population. However, in the patients with degenerative arthritis this procedure is rarely recommended due to the degenerative nature of the repaired meniscus itself. Recent studies and publications have shown that articular cartilage defects in the younger population can be managed by cartilage cell transplantation, periosteal or perichondral graft, osteochondral autograft, and osteochondral allograft. Good results can be expected by these procedures as long as the cartilage defect is contained and the rest of the cartilage is healthy. Unfortunately, this is not the story for most of the degenerative knee problems thus, excellent results are expected to be limited by arthroscopic treatment. Relatively large chondral defects with associated degenerative change can be managed by arthroscopic drilling, abrasion arthroplasty, and microfracture. Although cartilage regeneration by these techniques is not predictable and consistent, reasonable results can be obtained in the selective cases with controlled postoperative management. The patients should not be too old and 4 to 8 weeks postoperative non-weight-bearing is needed. Cases treated with this type of approach will be presented and discussed in this presentation

Background

The acetabular labrum provides sealing function and a degree of hip joint stability. Previous early(16 month) and mid-term(mean 3.5 years) follow-up of this cohort reported better patient related outcome measures in the refixation group.

Purpose: The purpose of this matched cohort study was to examine the clinical outcome of biceps tendon debridement at two years following surgery.

Method: The study group included patients who had undergone debridement of a tear of less than or equal to 50% of the biceps tendon. The control group did not have biceps pathology and was chosen from the same pool of data and was matched with the study group by sex, age and type of associated pathology. Standardized pre and post operative data on history and clinical examination of all patients had been collected prospectively. The outcome measures were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment form, the relative Constant-Murley score (CMS), and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index. Paired and independent T-tests were performed.

Results: Review of data identified 122 patients (16 females, 45 males in each group). The mean age was 59 (SD: 11) and 57 (SD: 12) for the study and control groups respectively. Fifty six percent of the subjects in each group (34/61) had impingement or partial thickness rotator cuff tears treated with a decompression (acromioplasty/ decompression). Twenty two patients (36%) had rotator cuff repair, and 5 (8%) had a SLAP repair. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the scores of WORC, ASES and CMS (p< 0.0001) in both groups. The magnitude of change, based on the effect size showed a large change in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in pre and post-operative scores or recovery between groups.

Conclusion: Low grade tears of the biceps tendon do not appear to produce more disability prior to surgical treatment and are effectively treated with biceps debridement in addition to surgical treatment of associated pathologies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(12):790–792.

Arthroscopy of ankle is becoming a common procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of ankle pain. Little information exists regarding the long term prognosis following ankle arthroscopy, particularly in avoiding further major surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognosis of arthroscopic ankle treatment, based on survival analysis. Also we will formalise the relationship between the arthroscopic treatment and time for a further major ankle surgery.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognosis of arthroscopic ankle treatment. Also we will formalise the relationship between the arthroscopic treatment and time for a further major ankle surgery

Patients and Methods: Consecutive Case Series study using prospectively gathered database. Between January 1997 to December 2000, Eighty consecutive patients (80 ankles) having ankle arthroscopy with the finding of Osteoarthritis (OA) or impingement were identified and their outcome at five years ascertained.

Arthroscopic procedure involved pre operative skin markings. Ankle distraction is used. An anterior approach used with standard Anteromedial and antero-lateral portals.

Treatment: debridement of osteochondral lesions, removal of loose bodies, curettage, drilling, synovec-tomy, and abrasion of the subchondral bone. All ankle joints had wash out.

Results: Results were examined using Kaplan Meier survival analysis. Statistical analysis of the results was done using Chi squared test.

Fifty five (69%) patients had soft tissue impingement, and 25 (31%) patients had osteoarthritic degenerative changes.

Seven (9%) patients had further major surgery and 6 (8%) had repeat arthroscopy.

The surgery was required for 7 arthritic ankles (7/25).

Survivorship: Survival analysis

28% of osteoarthritic patients progress to major ankle surgery, within 5 years of arthroscopic treatment. None of patients with impingement symptoms required further major surgery.

No statistical significance between those under 50 and those over 50 years in OA group

Conclusion: Arthroscopically treated impingement Ankles has an excellent prognosis, while osteoarthritic ankles have less favoured prognosis, with high proportion requiring further major surgery. Age does not affect prognosis in O.A group. Arthroscopy for OA, is likely to fail within 18 months.

Aim. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the existing published data on tuberculous arthritis involving native joints in adults aged 18 years and older. The specific research questions focused on the diagnosis and management of the disease. Method. This study was performed in accordance with the guidelines provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A systematic literature search was undertaken of Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane library. Only studies published in English since 1970 were considered. Case series involving less than 10 patients, systematic and narrative reviews, and laboratory or animal studies were excluded. We also excluded reports of TB infections not involving a “native joint” and tuberculosis of the spine. The level of evidence and strength of recommendations was performed in accordance with the GRADE system. Results. The systematic review of the literature yielded 2023 potential sources. Following deduplication, screening and full-text review, 20 data sources involving 573 patients from nine countries, were included. There was considerable variation amongst the studies in terms of the approach to diagnosis and management. The most common method used to confirm the diagnosis was microbiological culture of tissue obtained by biopsy, with positive findings in 93% of cases. Medical management involved a median 12 months of antitubercular treatment (IQR 8–16; range 4–18 months). Duration of pre-operative treatment ranged from two to 12 weeks in duration. Surgery was performed in approximately 87% of patients and varied from arthroscopic debridement to complete synovectomy combined with total joint arthroplasty. When arthroplasty and arthrodesis cases are excluded, 80% of patients received an open or arthroscopic debridement. The mean follow-up time of all studies was 26 months, with most studies demonstrating a minimum follow-up of at least six-months (range 3–112 months). Recurrence rates were reported in most studies, with an overall average recurrence rate of 7,4% (35 of 475). Conclusions. The current literature on TB arthritis highlights the need for the establishment of standardised diagnostic criteria. Further research is needed to define the optimal approach to medical and surgical treatment. The role of early debridement in active tuberculous arthritis needs to be explored further. Specifically, comparative studies are required to address the questions around use of medical treatment alone versus in combination with surgical intervention