Meniscal tears are the most common injury in the knee, affecting 66/100,000 people/year. Surgical treatment includes arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Little is known regarding medium-term outcomes following these procedures in isolated meniscal tears. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate patients with meniscal tears, and those who have undergone meniscectomy and meniscal repair using validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), further exploring factors which affect surgical outcomes. This observational study screened 334 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery at South Tyneside Hospital since August 2013. 134 patients with isolated meniscal tears were invited to complete postal PROMs. A combination of patient notes and radiological imaging was used to collect information of interest including age, gender, knee-laterality, injured meniscus, tear pattern, procedure performed, complications, and associated injuries. A total of 115 patients (pre-operative patients with current meniscal tear (n=36), meniscectomy (n=63), meniscal repair (n=16)) were included in the analysis with 96% successful PROM completion. Both meniscectomy and meniscal repairs (mean 55-months follow-up) showed better outcomes than pre-operative patients with meniscal tears. Meniscal repairs demonstrated superior outcomes across all PROMs when compared to meniscectomy, with a greater mean overall KOOS score of 17.2 (p=0.009). Factors including higher pre-operative Kellgren-Lawrence Grade, pre-operative articular cartilage lesions and bilateral meniscectomies were shown to negatively influence outcomes. Both meniscectomy and meniscal repair maintain clinical benefit at mean 55-months follow-up, affirming their use for treatment of meniscal tears. When feasible, meniscal repair should be performed preferentially over meniscectomy in isolated meniscal tears. Identified predictive factors allow adequate treatment stratification in specific patient groups

The aim of this study was to determine if patient reported outcome scores for arthroscopic meniscectomy are adversely affected by the degree of knee osteoarthritis or patient body mass index (BMI). All patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy within the NHS in Scotland between 6th February and 29th April 2012 were audited as part of the Scottish Government Musculoskeletal Knee Arthroscopy Audit and were eligible for inclusion within this study. A total of 270 patients returned both their pre-operative and post-operative EuroQol 5Q5D5L descriptive questionnaire and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Scores. Patients were stratified according to BMI, degree of osteoarthritis, history of injury, and duration of knee symptoms. Pre-operative to post-operative EuroQol index scores [0.642±0.253 to 0.735±0.277, median±SD] and Knee injury and Osteoarthrtis Outcome Scores [44.63±18.78 to 62.28±24.94, median±SD] improved across all patients (p<0.0001). This was irrespective of degree of BMI, history of injury, or duration of symptoms. There was no such improvement in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis. Those patients with a BMI >35 kg/m2 had lower post-operative scores than the pre-operative scores of those of BMI <30 kg/m2. Arthroscopic meniscectomy is beneficial regardless of patient BMI, duration of symptoms, history of injury, or in the presence of mild arthritis

The value of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the severely arthritic knee has been questioned. Some authors suggest that it may result in progression of osteoarthritis precipitating the need for joint replacement and that symptomatic improvement may occur from lavage alone.

126 patients with a torn meniscus and Outerbridge grade IV changes in the same compartment underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and limited debridement of unstable articular cartilage. The indication for surgery was a symptomatic meniscal tear not osteoarthritis. A control group consisted of 13 patients with grade IV changes and intact but frayed menisci who underwent washout alone. Mean age and follow up were similar in the two groups.

Initially meniscectomy improved symptoms in 82 cases (65%). Symptoms were unchanged in 26 cases (21%) and were made worse in 18 cases (14%). At a mean follow up of 55 months, 50 patients (40%) felt their knees were better than they were preoperatively. Their mean Lysholm score was 75. 5. 35 knees (28%) were not improved (mean Lysholm socre 59). 41 patients (32%) had undergone further surgery: 39 total knee replacements, 1 unicompartmental knee replacement and 1 tibial osteotomy. Older patients, those with varus/ valgus malalignment, and those with exposed bone on both articular surfaces fared worse.

Outcome following meniscectomy was better than outcome following washout alone: more patients reported an improvement after meniscectomy and fewer had undergone further surgery on their knees (p=0. 04). The median time between arthroscopy and the decisions for joint replacement was the same in both groups (8 months in the meniscectomy group and 7. 5 months in the washout group) indicating meniscectomy did not precipitate joint replacement.

These results suggest that arthroscopic partial men-iscectomy in the presence of Outerbridge grade IV changes can result in satisfactory long term outcomes for many patients, is more effective than washout alone and does not precipitate the need for joint replacement.

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this retrospective multicentric analysis was to study the functional and radiological outcomes at more than 20 years of 89 arthroscopic lateral menisectomy procedures performed on stable knees. Materialandmethod:The series included 89 arthroscopic lateral meniscectomies performed on knee with intact anterior cruciate ligaments (ACL). Mean follow-up was 22±3 years; 56 male, mean BMI 25±4, mean age at meniscectomy 35 years, mean age at last follow-up 57 years. Most of the injuries were vertical (41%), complex (22%) and radial (20%) lesions. The middle segment was involved in 79%. The meniscectomy removed more than one-third of the meniscus in 67%. All patients were reviewed by an independent operator for subjective assessment KOOS (100% normal) and IKDC, and for objective clinical and radiological measurements (IKDC). P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was no independent control group. Results: Revisions were performed for 16% of the knees. Intense or moderate activity was maintained by all patients. The subjective IKDC score was 71.1±23, comparable with an age and gender matched population. The mean KOOS score was 82% for pain, 80% for symptoms, 85% for daily activities, 64% for sports, and 69% for quality of life. The rate of of osteoarthritis was 56%, and 44% of patients had a difference between the two knees for osteoarthritis. The incidence of osteoarthritis was 53% and shift to valgus on the arthritic side was significantly associated with osteoarthritis, while the opposite side was well aligned. The knee was pain free in 27% of patients. Significant factors for good prognosis were age less than 38 years at first operation, moderate BMI, and minimal cartilage damage (grade 0 or 1). Conclusion: After the first postoperative year after arthroscopic lateral meniscectomy on a stable knee, the results remain stable and satisfactory for more than 22 years. Nevertheless, patients aged over 40 with a high BMI and cartilage damage at the time of the first operation have a less encouraging prognosis

Abstract. Introduction. Recent research has questioned the role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear leading to the development of treatment recommendations for these patients. There is a clear need to understand patient perceptions of living with a meniscal tear in order to plan future research and treatment guidelines. Aims. To explore the experiences and expectations of treatment of young patients with a meniscal tear of the knee. Methodology. Ten participants diagnosed with a meniscal tear were recruited from the METRO cohort study using a purposive sampling strategy. These patients underwent semi-sructured interviews between April and May 2021. Thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts and generate key themes in order to describe the data. Results. Themes identified relate to the broad areas of: the effect of symptoms, the expericne of the clinical consultation and the experience of the treatment modality undertaken. Meniscal tears have a profound impact on pain and many patients experience effects on their family and financial life in addition to physical symptoms. Participants expected the majority of their management to occur in secondary care and most thought surgery would be a definitive treatment, while the effectiveness of physiotherapy could not be guaranteed as it would not fix the physical tear. Conclusion. Patient experience of meniscal tear may not correspond with current available clinical evidence. Clinicians should consider the common misconceptions highlighted in this study when conducting a consultation and pre-empt them to optimally manage patient expectations

Abstract. Introduction. Previous research has demonstrated no clinically significant benefit of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear, however, patients included in these studies would not meet current treatment recommendations. Prior to further randomised controlled trials (RCTs) research is needed to understand a younger population in more detail. Aim. To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with a meniscal tear and explore any association between baseline characteristics and outcome. Methodology. A prospective, national multicentre cohort study was performed recruiting patients aged 18 to 55 presenting to secondary care. MRI analysis of arthritis was performed using Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and bone shape analysis. Outcomes included the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) at 12 months. Results. 150 participants were recruited across eight sites with a mean age of 43.47 (SD 9.63). MRI analysis using WORMS score and bone shape analysis revealed no or early osteoarthritis. At 12 months, 67 (44.67%) of participants were managed non-operatively and 68 (45.33%) were operatively. Participants in the operative group were significantly younger with a lower BMI (p<0.05). A stepwise logistic regression model including 17 characteristics revealed that only baseline score and surgery significantly affected 12-month WOMET and KOOS4. Conclusion. This study in contrast to previous trials demonstrated a benefit of surgery for patients with a meniscal tear. The METRO study demonstrates that it is feasible to recruit younger patients and a future RCT is required using the study population included in this cohort

The February 2014 Knee Roundup. 360 . looks at: whether sham surgery is as good as arthroscopic meniscectomy; distraction in knee osteoarthritis; whether trans-tibial tunnel placement increases the risk of graft failure in ACL surgery; whether joint replacements prevent cardiac events; the size of the pulmonary embolism problem; tranexamic acid and knee replacement haemostasis; matching the demand for knee replacement and follow-up; predicting the length of stay after knee replacement; and popliteal artery injury in TKR

The April 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Genetic determinants of ACL strength; TKA outcomes influenced by prosthesis; Single- or two-stage revision for infected TKA?; Arthroscopic meniscectomy: a problem that just won’t go away!; Failure in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction; ACL reconstruction in the over 50s?; Knee arthroplasty for early osteoarthritis; All inside meniscal repair; Steroids, thrombogenic markers and TKA

The February 2014 Research Roundup. 360 . looks at: blood supply to the femoral head after dislocation; diabetes and hip replacement; bone remodelling over two decades following hip replacement; sham surgery as good as arthroscopic meniscectomy; distraction in knee osteoarthritis; whether joint replacement prevent cardiac events; tranexamic acid and knee replacement haemostasis; cartilage colonisation in bipolar ankle grafts; CTs and proof of fusion; atorvastatin for muscle re-innervation after sciatic nerve transection; microfracture and short-term pain in cuff repair; promising early results from L-PRF augmented cuff repairs; and fatty degeneration in a rodent model

Aim: Osteoarthritis can be a progressive disabling disease, which results from the pathological imbalance of degradative and reparative processes. The synovium, bone, and cartilage are each well established sites involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to progressive joint degeneration. However, the role of meniscus is not known enough. We studied the distribution of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) in man menisci and its changes in osteoarthritis. Patients and Methods: We studied 30 internal menisci from patients with knee osteoarthritis that underwent a total knee arthroplasty and meniscal tissue get from partial arthroscopic meniscectomy in 5 young patients that suffered internal meniscus tear within three months after the damage. Meniscal samples were processed for histology, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization, for assessment of cell density, cells actively dividing as well as apoptotic cells, distribution of COMP and estimate the proteoglycan content. Results: Osteoarthritic meniscus demonstrated areas depleted of cells and significant decrease in COMP immunostaining. Cell clusters were found around meniscal tears. We did not find cells activity dividing in the osteoarthritic group, but there were dividing cells in meniscectomy group. Proteoglycan staining was decreased in meniscus from osteoarthritis group. Conclusions: Osteoarthritis leads to decrease cell population in menisci, loose of COMP as well as altered matrix organization. The role of meniscus in osteoarthritis of the knee is no clear but our results demonstrate changes in COMP and cells in osteoarthritis menisci. These changes reveal an altered scaffold and changes in the meniscus function. Perhaps these alterations have influence on development of knee osteoarthritis

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of a series of 108 children treated artroscopically for symptomatic discoid lateral menisci. Methods: The medical records of more than 100 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic discoid meniscus between 1990 and 2005 were reviewed. Results: The mean patient age was 8.7 years (range, 2,5 to 14 years), with 55% female and 45% male patients. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 20 months (range, 2 to 48 months), with 95% having pain and 38% having mechanical impingment. All patients were treated arthroscopically. Partial or subtotal arthroscopic meniscectomy was performed. Operative classification of the menisci revealed 64 complete, 18 Wrisberg type and 26 incomplete discoid menisci, with meniscal tears being present in 48 knees (45%). At final follow-up, all patients exhibited full knee flexion beyond 135 degrees. Three patients reported residual knee pain, and four reported intermittent mechanical symptoms. At final follow-up, 3 years minimum, according to Ikeuchi clinical score more than 50 % of the patients were considered very good and 25 % good. Only 8 patients felt that their activity level remained partially limited. Conclusions: Our results show the middle-term efficacy of arthroscopic partial or subtotal meniscectomy in cases of symptomatic lateral discoid menisci. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is preferrable only when the posterior attachment of the discoid meniscus is stable. A total meniscectomy is indicated for the Wrisberg-ligament type of discoid meniscus and when the meniscus is completely degenerated. This to our knowledge is the largest series of discoid lateral menisci arthroscopically treated. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of medial and lateral meniscal injury in operated and non-operated knees. Material and methods: This prospective longitudinal study was conducted between January 1st 1995 and December 31st 1997. Each patient had a physical examination, a standard radiography study, and an MRI and an arthroscopy. The MRI was performed with two machines running at 1.5 Tesla and 0.5 Tesla. Spin-echo T2 slices were obtained in the saggital plane, and spin-echo fat saturation slices in the frontal and axial planes. Arthroscopy was performed and/or controlled by the same operator. Results: The protocol included 132 patients. Ten patients (ten knees) had another arthroscopy after arthroscopic meniscectomy. Mean time between the physical examination and MRI was 57 days, it was 69 days between MRI and arthroscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and precision were, respectively, 94.8%, 61.%, 86.7%, 81.5% and 85.6% for the medial meniscus and 73%, 93.3%, 76% 93.5% and 90.1% for the lateral meniscus. Discussion: Arthroscopy remains the gold standard for prospective comparative studies (Reigher 1986, Jackson 1988, Kelly 1991). MRI is the examination of choice for the diagnosis of meniscal injury in non-operated knees (Polly 1988). Most false positives concern injuries located on the posterior part of the medial meniscus. For radiologists (Mink 1988), these false negatives would result from poor analysis by the arthroscopic surgeon (Quinn 1991). Arthroscopists point out that radiologists overestimate injuries of the posterior segment (Barronian 1989, Fischer 1991, Spiers 1994). These false negatives involve the lateral meniscus (Cheung 1997). Our study corroborates the results reported in the literature. For repeated arthroscopies, no conclusion can be drawn from the interval of confidence observed in a population of ten knees. Nevertheless, in these knees, the MRI provided a good means of identifying recurrent lesions of both the medial and lateral menisci. Conclusion: The physical examination provide a strong clue to meniscal injury in non-operated knees, so it is not necessary to perform an MRI before arthroscopy In all other cases, particularly there is recurrence, MRI can identify injury to the medial or lateral menisci with good sensitivity and specificity. In most cases, if the MRI is negative, it is not necessary to perform arthroscopy to search for a meniscal injury

Aims

The aim of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Meniscal Consensus Project was to develop an evidence-based treatment guideline for patients with meniscal lesions of the knee.

Aims

Elective surgery has been severely curtailed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is little evidence to guide surgeons in assessing what processes should be put in place to restart elective surgery safely in a time of endemic COVID-19 in the community.

The February 2014 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: whether arthroscopic acromioplasty is a cost-effective intervention; shockwave therapy in cuff tear; whether microfracture relieves short-term pain in cuff repair; the promising early results from L-PRF augmented cuff repairs; rehabilitation following cuff repair; supination strength following biceps tendon rupture; whether longer is better in humeral components; fatty degeneration in a rodent model; and the controversial acromioclavicular joint dislocation.