Aims. Deciphering the genetic relationships between major depressive disorder (MDD) and osteoarthritis (OA) may facilitate an understanding of their biological mechanisms, as well as inform more effective treatment regimens. We aim to investigate the mechanisms underlying relationships between MDD and OA in the context of common genetic variations. Methods. Linkage disequilibrium score regression was used to test the genetic correlation between MDD and OA. Polygenic analysis was performed to estimate shared genetic variations between the two diseases. Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis was used to investigate causal relationships between MDD and OA. Genomic loci shared between MDD and OA were identified using cross-trait meta-analysis. Fine-mapping of transcriptome-wide associations was used to prioritize putatively causal genes for the two diseases. Results. MDD has a significant genetic correlation with OA (r. g. = 0.29) and the two diseases share a considerable proportion of causal variants. Mendelian randomization analysis indicates that genetic liability to MDD has a causal effect on OA (b. xy. = 0.24) and genetic liability to OA conferred a causal effect on MDD (b. xy. = 0.20). Cross-trait meta-analyses identified 29 shared genomic loci between MDD and OA. Together with fine-mapping of transcriptome-wide association signals, our results suggest that Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1), SRY-Box Transcription Factor 5 (SOX5), and Glutathione Peroxidase 1 (GPX1) may have therapeutic implications for both MDD and OA. Conclusion. The study reveals substantial shared genetic liability between MDD and OA, which may confer risk for one another. Our findings provide a novel insight into phenotypic relationships between MDD and OA. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(1):12–22

Aims. Healthcare systems have been rapidly restructured to meet COVID-19 demand. Clinicians are working to novel clinical guidelines, treating new patient cohorts and working in unfamiliar environments. Trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) has experienced cancellation of routine clinics and operating, with redistribution of the workload and human resources. To date, no studies have evaluated the mental health impact of these changes on the T&O workforce. We report the results of a novel survey on the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of our orthopaedic workforce and the contributory factors. Methods. A 20-question survey-based cross-sectional study of orthopaedic team members was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary objective was to identify the impact of the pandemic on mental health in the form of major depressive disorder (MDD) and general anxiety disorder (GAD). The survey incorporated the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-2), which is validated for screening of MDD, and the generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire (GAD-2), which is validated for screening of GAD. Results. There were 62 respondents (18 females and 44 males). As compared to the general population, we noted a greater estimated prevalence of GAD (17.7% vs 5.9%, p = 0.0009297) and MDD (19.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.0000007731). The prevalence of MDD symptoms was greatest among senior house officers (SHOs) (p = 0.02216). Female respondents scored higher for symptoms of MDD (p = 0.03583) and GAD (p = 0.0001086). Those identifying as ‘Black, African, Caribbean or Black British’ displayed a higher prevalence of GAD symptoms (p = 0.001575) and felt least supported at work (p = 0.001341). Conclusion. Our study, in the first of its kind, shows a significant prevalence of GAD and MDD in the workforce. We found that SHOs, females and those of Black, African, Caribbean, or Black British origin were disproportionately affected. Action should be taken to help prevent adverse mental health outcomes for our colleagues during the pandemic. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:316–325

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most common cause of disability worldwide, and lumbar spine fusion (LSF) is often chosen to treat pain caused by advanced degenerative disease when clinical treatment failed certain cases, the post-surgical outcomes are not what was expected. Several studies highlight how important are. In psychological variables during the postoperative spine surgery period. The aim of this study is to assess the role of preoperative depression on postoperative clinical outcomes. We included patients who underwent LSF since December 2021. Preoperative depression was assessed administering Beck Depression Inventory questionnaire (BDI). And pain and disability were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months, administering respectively Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). As statistical analysis Mann-Whitney test was performed. We included 46 patients, 20 female (43,5%) and 26 male (56,5%) with an average age of 64,2. The population was divided in two groups, fixing the BDI cut-off point at 10. Patients with BDI < 10 points (N=28) had normal mental health status, instead patients with BDI > 10 points (N=16) had depressive disorders. At 3 months patients with healthy mental status reported statistically significant reduction of pain (U = 372,5, p = .006) and improvement of disability but without statistical significancy (U = 318, p = 0,137). At 6 months patients without psychological disease reported statistically significant reduction of pain (U = 342, p = 0,039) and disability (U = 372,5, p = 0,006). This study demonstrates the correlation between pre-existing depressive state and poorer clinical outcomes after spine surgery. These results are consistent with the literature. Therefore, during the surgical decision making it is crucial to take psychological variables into account in order to predict the results after surgery and inform patients on the potential influence of mental status

Introduction. Patients undergoing TJA have higher rates of anxiety and/or depression than the general population and higher costs of care. These preoperative diagnoses lead to higher levels of postoperative dissatisfaction and depression patients alone have higher readmission rates. There is significant crossover between anxiety and depressive disorders, and many patients are classed as combined. Our goal was to evaluate readmission rates of patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty with diagnoses of anxiety, depression or both. Methods. Our hospital's prospectively collected data from our statewide total joint database (MARCQI) was reviewed from 2013–2018. Rates of anxiety and/or depression were determined based preoperative anxiolytic or antidepressant medications using national drug codes. Independent sample t-tests compared continuous variables and Chi-square tests (or Fisher's exact tests) compared categorical variables. Potential risk factors were identified by multivariable logistic regression modeling. Results. 4,107 cases (1,261 THA and 2,846 TKA) were included. 176 patients (4.28%) had a readmission within the 90-day global period. 476 patients (12%) had history of depression or anxiety or both. For the entire cohort, those on anxiolytic medication were 153% more likely to be readmitted than those not on medication (p=0.017). When patients were stratified based on THA or TKA, patients taking anxiolytic medication undergoing TKA were 120% more likely to undergo readmission within 90 days (p=0.021). Patients on depression medication alone were not at increased risk of readmission in the TKA cohort (p=0.991). For THA patients neither diagnosis appeared a risk factor for readmission (p=0.852). Conclusions. Patients with depression, anxiety, or both undergoing TKA were at a statistically significant risk of readmission within 90-days compared to patients without these diagnoses. Anxiety and depression were both risk factors for readmission, but anxiety appeared to have a more significant impact. THA on the other hand did not appear to share this risk profile

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(10):654–656.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine whether total hip arthroplasty (THA) for chronic hip pain due to unilateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) has a beneficial effect on cognitive performance.

Aims

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) is an often devastating injury that affects patients physically and emotionally. The vast majority of the published literature is based on surgeon-graded assessment of motor outcomes, but the patient experience after BPI is not well understood. Our aim was to better understand overall life satisfaction after BPI, with the goal of identifying areas that can be addressed in future delivery of care.