Aims. For rare cases when a tumour infiltrates into the hip joint, extra-articular resection is required to obtain a safe margin. Endoprosthetic reconstruction following tumour resection can effectively ensure local control and improve postoperative function. However, maximizing bone preservation without compromising surgical margin remains a challenge for surgeons due to the complexity of the procedure. The purpose of the current study was to report clinical outcomes of patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the hip joint using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis. Methods. We reviewed 15 patients over a five-year period (January 2017 to December 2022) who had undergone extra-articular resection of the hip joint due to malignant tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis. Each of the 15 patients had a single lesion, with six originating from the acetabulum side and nine from the proximal femur. All patients had their posterior column preserved according to the surgical plan. Results. Postoperative pathological assessment revealed a negative surgical margin was achieved in all patients. At final follow-up, 13.3% (2/15) died and no recurrence occurred. The overall survival was 81.7% at five years. None of the patients showed any signs of aseptic loosening, and no wound healing issues were observed. In total, 20% (3/15) developed complications, with two cases of early hip dislocation and one case of deep infection. The cumulative incidence of mechanical and non-mechanical failure in this series was 13.7% and 9.3%, respectively, at five years. In this cohort, the mean time to full weightbearing was 5.89 (SD 0.92) weeks and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.1 (SD 4.4). Conclusion. For patients with a hip joint tumour who met the inclusion criteria and were deemed suitable for posterior column preservation, a custom-made osteotomy guide combined with 3D-printed endoprosthesis is worth performing when treating patients who require extra-articular resection of the hip joint, as it can achieve adequate margin for local control, maximize bone preservation to maintain pelvic ring integrity, reduce the risk of complications by simplifying the surgical procedure, and allow for more precise reconstruction for better function. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1027–1036

Aims. Patients with proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) are often multimorbid, thus unplanned readmissions following surgery are common. We therefore aimed to analyze 30-day and one-year readmission rates, reasons for, and factors associated with, readmission risk in a cohort of patients with surgically treated PFFs across Austria. Methods. Data from 11,270 patients with PFFs, treated surgically (osteosyntheses, n = 6,435; endoprostheses, n = 4,835) at Austrian hospitals within a one-year period (January to December 2021) was retrieved from the Leistungsorientierte Krankenanstaltenfinanzierung (Achievement-Oriented Hospital Financing). The 30-day and one-year readmission rates were reported. Readmission risk for any complication, as well as general medicine-, internal medicine-, and surgery/injury-associated complications, and factors associated with readmissions, were investigated. Results. The 30-day and one-year readmission rates due to any complication were 15% and 47%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate (p = 0.001) was higher in endoprosthesis than osteosynthesis patients; this was not the case for the one-year readmission rate (p = 0.138). Internal medicine- (n = 2,273 (20%)) and surgery/injury-associated complications (n = 1,612 (14%)) were the most common reason for one-year readmission. Regardless of the surgical procedure, male sex was significantly associated with higher readmission risk due to any, as well as internal medicine-associated, complication. Advanced age was significantly associated with higher readmission risk after osteosynthesis. In both cohorts, treatment at mid-sized hospitals was significantly associated with lower readmission risk due to any complication, while prolonged length of stay was associated with higher one-year readmission risks due to any complication, as well as internal-medicine associated complications. Conclusion. Future health policy decisions in Austria should focus on optimization of perioperative and post-discharge management of this vulnerable patient population. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):294–303

Amputation was once widely practised for primary bone tumours of the limbs. Yet this situation has changed with limb salvage surgery becoming increasingly popular in the last 30 years. Many different techniques are now available. These include allografts, autografts, endoprostheses and allograft-prosthesis composites. This article reviews these methods, concentrating on the functional outcomes and complications that have been reported.

Aims. The proximal tibia (PT) is the anatomical site most frequently affected by primary bone tumours after the distal femur. Reconstruction of the PT remains challenging because of the poor soft-tissue cover and the need to reconstruct the extensor mechanism. Reconstructive techniques include implantation of massive endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis), osteoarticular allografts (OAs), or allograft-prosthesis composites (APCs). Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of clinical data relating to patients who underwent proximal tibial arthroplasty in our regional bone tumour centre from 2010 to 2018. Results. A total of 76 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Mean age at surgery was 43.2 years (12 to 86 (SD 21)). The mean follow-up period was 60.1 months (5.4 to 353). In total 21 failures were identified, giving an overall failure rate of 27.6%. Prosthesis survival at five years was 75.5%, and at ten years was 59%. At last follow-up, mean knee flexion was 89.8° (SD 36°) with a mean extensor lag of 18.1° (SD 24°). In univariate analysis, factors associated with better survival of the prosthesis were a malignant or metastatic cancer diagnosis (versus benign), with a five- and ten-year survival of 78.9% and 65.7% versus 37.5% (p = 0.045), while in-hospital length of stay longer than nine days was also associated with better prognosis with five- and ten-year survival rates at 84% and 84% versus 60% and 16% (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only in-hospital length of stay was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.66). Conclusion. We have shown that proximal tibial arthroplasty with endoprosthesis is a safe and reliable method for reconstruction in patients treated for orthopaedic oncological conditions. Either modular or custom implants in this series performed well. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(9):733–740

Paediatric bone sarcomas around the knee are often amenable to either endoprosthetic reconstruction or rotationplasty. Cosmesis and durability dramatically distinguish these two options, although patient-reported functional satisfaction has been similar among survivors. However, the impact on oncological and surgical outcomes for these approaches has not been directly compared. We retrospectively reviewed all wide resections for bone sarcoma of the distal femur or proximal tibia that were reconstructed either with an endoprosthesis or by rotationplasty at our institution between June 2004 and December 2014 with a minimum two year follow-up. Pertinent demographic information, surgical and oncological outcomes were reviewed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Thirty eight patients with primary sarcomas around the knee underwent wide resection and either endoprosthetic reconstruction (n=19) or rotationplasty (n=19). Groups were comparable in terms of demographic parameters and systemic tumour burden at presentation. We found that selection of endoprosthetic reconstruction versus rotationplasty did not impact overall survival for the entire patient cohort but was significant in subgroup analysis. Two-year overall survival was 86.7% and 85.6% in the endoprosthesis and rotationplasty groups, respectively (p=0.33). When only patients with greater than 90% chemotherapy-induced necrosis were considered, overall survival was significantly better in the rotationplasty versus endoprosthesis groups (100% vs. 72.9% at two years, p=0.013). Similarly, while event-free survival was not affected by reconstruction method (60.2% vs. 73.3% at two years for endoprosthesis vs rotationplasty, p=0.27), there was a trend towards lower local recurrence in rotationplasty patients (p=0.07). When surgical outcomes were considered, a higher complication rate was seen in patients that received an endoprosthesis compared to those who underwent rotationplasty. Including all reasons for re-operation, 78.9% (n=15) of the endoprosthesis patients required a minimum of one additional surgery compared with only 26.3% (n=5) among rotationplasty patients (p=0.003). The most common reasons for re-operation in endoprosthesis patients were wound breakdown/infection (n=6), limb length discrepancy (n=6) and periprosthetic fracture (n=2). Excluding limb length equalisation procedures, the average time to re-operation in this patient population was 5.6 months (range 1 week to 23 months). Similarly, the most common reason for a secondary procedure in rotationplasty patients was wound breakdown/infection, although only two patients experienced this complication. Average time to re-operation in this group was 23.8 months (range 5 to 49 months). Endoprosthetic reconstruction and rotationplasty are both viable limb-salvage options following wide resection of high-grade bony sarcomas located around the knee in the paediatric population. Endoprosthetic reconstruction is associated with a higher complication rate and may negatively impact local recurrence. Study of a larger number of patients is needed to determine whether the reconstructive choice affects survival

The reconstruction of peri-acetabular defects after severe bone loss or pelvic resection for tumor is among the most challenging surgical intervention. The Lumic® prosthesis (Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany) was first introduced in 2008 in an effort to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with the classic peri-acetabular reconstruction techniques and to improve functional outcomes. Few have evaluated the results associated with the use of this recent implant. A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. Every patient in whom a Lumic® endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction after peri-acetabular resection or severe bone loss with a minimal follow-up of three months was included. The charts were reviewed and data concerning patients’ demographics, peri-operative characteristics and post-operative complications was collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were also assessed. Sixteen patients, 11 males and five females, were included and were followed for 28 months [3 – 60]. Mean age was 55 [17–86], and mean BMI reached 28 [19.6 – 44]. Twelve patients (75%) had a Lumic® after a resection of a primary sarcoma, two following pelvic metastasis, one for a benign tumor and one after a comminuted acetabular fracture with bone loss. Twelve patients (75%) had their surgery performed in one stage whereas four had a planned two-stage procedure. Mean surgical time was 555 minutes [173-1230] and blood loss averaged 2100 mL [500-5000]. MSTS score mean was 60.3 preoperatively [37.1 – 97] and 54.3 postoperatively [17.1-88.6]. Five patients (31.3%) had a cemented Lumic® stem. All patients got the dual mobility bearing, and 10 patients (62.5%) had the largest acetabular cup implanted (60 mm). In seven of these 10 patients the silver coated implant was used to minimize risk of infection. Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a synthetic fabric aiming to reduce the dislocation risk. Five patients had per-operative complications (31.3%), four were minor and one was serious (comminuted iliac bone fracture requiring internal fixation). Four patients dislocated within a month post-operatively and one additional patient sustained a dislocation one year post-operatively. Eight patients (50%) had a post-operative surgical site infection. All four patients who had a two-stage surgery had an infection. Ten patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation (two for fabric insertion, five for wash-outs, and three for implant exchange/removal). One patient (6.3%) had a septic loosening three years after surgery. At the time of data collection, 13 patients (81.3%) were alive with nine free of disease. Silver coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p=0.2) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p=1). These results are comparable to the sparse data published. Lumic® endoprosthesis is therefore shown to provide good functional outcomes and low rates of loosening on short to medium term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and of the use of silver coated implants. Larger series and longer follow-ups are needed

The reconstruction of peri-acetabular defects after severe bone loss or pelvic resection for tumor is among the most challenging surgical intervention. The Lumic® prosthesis (Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany) was first introduced in 2008 in an effort to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with the classic peri-acetabular reconstruction techniques and to improve functional outcomes. Few have evaluated the results associated with the use of this recent implant. A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. Every patient in whom a Lumic® endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction after peri-acetabular resection or severe bone loss with a minimal follow-up of three months was included. The charts were reviewed and data concerning patients’ demographics, peri-operative characteristics and post-operative complications was collected. Surgical and functional outcomes were also assessed. Sixteen patients, 11 males and five females, were included and were followed for 28 months [3 – 60]. Mean age was 55 [17-86], and mean BMI reached 28 [19.6 – 44]. Twelve patients (75%) had a Lumic® after a resection of a primary sarcoma, two following pelvic metastasis, one for a benign tumor and one after a comminuted acetabular fracture with bone loss. Twelve patients (75%) had their surgery performed in one stage whereas four had a planned two-stage procedure. Mean surgical time was 555 minutes [173-1230] and blood loss averaged 2100 mL [500-5000]. MSTS score mean was 60.3 preoperatively [37.1 – 97] and 54.3 postoperatively [17.1-88.6]. Five patients (31.3%) had a cemented Lumic® stem. All patients got the dual mobility bearing, and 10 patients (62.5%) had the largest acetabular cup implanted (60 mm). In seven of these 10 patients the silver coated implant was used to minimize risk of infection. Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a synthetic fabric aiming to reduce the dislocation risk. Five patients had per-operative complications (31.3%), four were minor and one was serious (comminuted iliac bone fracture requiring internal fixation). Four patients dislocated within a month post-operatively and one additional patient sustained a dislocation one year post-operatively. Eight patients (50%) had a post-operative surgical site infection. All four patients who had a two-stage surgery had an infection. Ten patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation (two for fabric insertion, five for wash-outs, and three for implant exchange/removal). One patient (6.3%) had a septic loosening three years after surgery. At the time of data collection, 13 patients (81.3%) were alive with nine free of disease. Silver coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p=0.2) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p=1). These results are comparable to the sparse data published. Lumic® endoprosthesis is therefore shown to provide good functional outcomes and low rates of loosening on short to medium term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and of the use of silver coated implants. Larger series and longer follow-ups are needed

Primary bone tumors are rare, complex and highly heterogeneous. Its diagnostic and treatment are a challenge for the multidisciplinary team. Developments on tumor biomarkers, immunohistochemistry, histology, molecular, bioinformatics, and genetics are fundamental for an early diagnosis and identification of prognostic factors. The personalized medicine allows an effective patient tailored treatment. The bone biopsy is essential for diagnosis. Treatment may include systemic therapy and local therapy. Frequently, a limb salvage surgery includes wide resection and reconstruction with endoprosthesis, biological or composites. The risk for local recurrence and distant metastases depends on the primary tumor and treatment response. Cancer patients are living longer and bone metastases are increasing. Bone is the third most frequently location for distant lesions. Bone metastases are associated to pain, pathological fractures, functional impairment, and neurological deficits. It impacts survival and patient quality of life. The treatment of metastatic disease is a challenge due to its complexity and heterogeneity, vascularization, reduced size and limited access. It requires a multidisciplinary treatment and depending on different factors it is palliative or curative-like treatment. For multiple bone metastases it is important to relief pain and increases function in order to provide the best quality of life and expect to prolong survival. Advances in nanotechnology, bioinformatics, and genomics, will increase biomarkers for early detection, prognosis, and targeted treatment effectiveness. We are taking the leap forward in precision medicine and personalized care

Rates of prosthetic joint infection in megaprostheses are high. The application of silver ion coating to implants serves as a deterrent to infection and biofilm formation. A retrospective review was performed of all silver-coated MUTARS endoprosthetic reconstructions (SC-EPR) by a single Orthopaedic Oncology Surgeon. We examined the rate of component revision due to infection and the rate of infection successfully treated with antibiotic therapy. We reviewed overall revision rates, sub-categorised into the Henderson groupings for endoprosthesis modes of failure (Type 1 soft tissue failure, Type 2 aseptic loosening, Type 3 Structural failure, Type 4 Infection, Type 5 tumour progression). 283 silver-coated MUTARS endoprosthetic reconstructions were performed for 229 patients from October 2012 to July 2022. The average age at time of surgery was 58.9 years and 53% of our cohort were males. 154 (71.3%) patients underwent SC-EPR for oncological reconstruction and 32 (14.8%) for reconstruction for bone loss following prosthetic joint infection(s). Proximal femur SC-EPR (82) and distal femur (90) were the most common procedures. This cohort had an overall revision rate of 21.2% (60/283 cases). Component revisions were most commonly due to Type 4 infection (19 cases), Type 2 aseptic loosening/culture negative disease (15 cases), and Type 1 dislocation/soft tissue (12 cases). Component revision rate for infection was 6.7% (19 cases). 15 underwent exchange of implants and 4 underwent transfemoral amputation due to recalcitrant infection and failure of soft tissue coverage. This equates to a limb salvage rate of 98.3%. The most common causative organisms remain staphylococcus species (47%) and polymicrobial infections (40%). We expand on the existing literature advocating for the use of silver-coated endoprosthetic reconstructions. We provide insights from the vast experience of a single surgeon when addressing patients with oncological and bone loss-related complex reconstruction problems

The implantation of endoprosthesis is a routine procedure in orthopaedics. Endoprosthesis are mainly manufactured from ceramics, polymers, metals or metal alloys. To ensure longevity of the implants they should be as biocompatible as possible and ideally have antibacterial properties, to avoid periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Various antibacterial implant materials have been proposed, but have so far only been used sporadically in patients. PJI is one of the main risk factors for revision surgeries. The aim of the study was to identify novel implant coatings that both exhibit antibacterial properties whilst having optimal biocompatibility. Six different novel implant coatings and surface modifications (EBM TiAl6V4, strontium, TiCuN, TiNbN, gentamicin phosphate (GP), gentamicin phosphate+cationic polymer (GP+CP)) were compared to standard CoCrMo-alloy. The coatings were further characterized with regard to the surface roughness. E. coli and S. capitis were cultured on the modified surfaces to investigate the antibacterial properties. To quantify bacterial proliferation the optical density (OD) was measured and viability was determined using colony forming units (CFU). Murine bone marrow derived macrophages (BMMs) were cultured on the surfaces and differentiated into osteoblasts to quantify the mineralisation using the alizarin red assay. All novel coatings showed reduced bacterial proliferation and viability compared to standard CoCrMo-alloy. A significant reduction was observed for GP and GP+CP coated samples compared to CoCrMo (OD. GP,E.coli. = 0.18±0.4; OD. GP+CP,E.coli. = 0.13±0.3; p≤0.0002; N≥7-8). An increase in osteoblast-mediated mineralisation was observed on all surfaces tested compared to CoCrMo. Furthermore, GP and GP+CP coated samples showed a statistically significant increase (M. GP. = 0.21±0.1; M. GP+CP. = 0.25±0.2; p<0.0001; N≥3-6). The preliminary data indicates that the gentamicin containing surfaces have the most effective antibacterial property and the highest osseointegrative capacity. The use of antibiotic coatings on prostheses could reduce the risk of PJI while being applied on osseointegrative implant surfaces

Aim. The risk of haematogenic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after dental procedures is discussed controversially. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated infections according to the origin of infection based on the natural habitat of the bacteria. We investigated the frequency of positive monomicrobial cultures involving bacteria from oral cavity in patients with suspected PJI compared to bone and joint infections without joint prosthesis. Method. In this retrospective study we included all patients with suspected PJI or bone and joint infection without endoprosthesis, hospitalized at our orthopaedic clinic from January 2009 through March 2014. Excluded were patients with superficial surgical site infections or missing data. Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were collected using a standardized case report form. Groups were compared regarding infections caused by oral bacteria. χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was employed for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Results. A total of 1673 patients were included, of whom 996 (60%) had a suspected PJI and 677 (40%) an osteoarticular infection without joint endoprosthesis (control group). In patients with suspected PJI the median age (standard deviation) was 67 (14) years; 407 (41%) were males. The anatomic location of the prosthesis was hip in 522 (52%) patients, knee in 437 (44%), megaprostheses in 14 (1%), shoulder in 8 (1%) and other endoprosthesis in 15 (2%) patients. In 437 (44%) of PJI cases pathogen(s) were detected, 271 (62%) were monomicrobial and 166 (38%) polymicrobial. Of 996 patients with suspected PJI, 2.4% (n = 24) had monomicrobial infections caused by bacteria belonging to the normal oral flora, predominantly oral streptococci (n = 21). In contrast, only 0.4% (n =3) of the control group without joint prosthesis had monomicrobial infections caused by oral bacteria. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002), whereas the patient age (p = 0.058) and the anatomic location of the joint prosthesis (p = 0.622) did not have any effect on the infections due to oral bacteria. Conclusions. The incidence of infections caused by oral bacteria was significantly higher in patients with endoprosthesis than in other osteoarticular infections (2.4% versus 0.4%). This finding indicates that joint prostheses are at risk of haematogenous PJI originating from oral cavity. Future prospective studies need to determine the exact risk of haematogenic PJI caused by oral bacteria, as well as the potential of preventing these infections by antibiotic prophylaxis

Aim. Diagnostics of orthopedic implant infection remains challenging and often shows false negative or inadequate results. Several methods have been described to improve diagnostic methods but most of them are expensive (PCR) or not accessible for all hospitals (sonication). Aim of this study was to evaluate the results of incubation of orthopedic explants compared to biopsies and punction fluid using conventional microbiological methods. Method. In this prospective study, we included patients who received septic or aseptic orthopedic implant removal in a single University hospital between July and December 2018. A part of the explant as well as minimum 2 tissue biopsies or additional punction fluid were put in a bouillon and incubated for 11 days. Patient´s records with co-morbidities, use of antibiotics and demographic data were evaluated. The results were analyzed. The study was approved by the ethical committee. Results. 94 patients were included in this study (43 females, 51 males, mean age 54 years). We detected statistically significant more pathogens in the bouillon with explants compared to biopsies (p=0,0059). We found the same results with pedicle screws (n=11, p=0,039) and endoprosthesis (n=56, p=0,019). Patients after osteosynthesis (p=27) showed same results but statistically not significant (p=0,050). Use of antibiotics did not have influence on the diagnostic result as well as co-morbidities. In 38 patients (40,4%), additional bacteria could be detected in explant´s bouillon. Most common pathogens were Staph. aureus, E. faecalis, Staph. epidermidis and Micrococcus luteus, mixed infections could be found in 9%. Conclusions. In this study we could show that incubation of orthopedic implants has advantages in diagnostics of pathogens in infected endoprosthesis, osteosynthesis and spondylodesis. This method is simple compared to PCR or sonication and as cheap as incubation of tissue samples but in 40% of the cases, additional pathogens can be detected. We recommend to incubate removed screws, hip endoprosthetic heads or inlays in bouillon to optimize diagnostics and to detect all pathogens

Proximal femoral bone loss is often observed after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and continues to complicate revisions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with the unusual finding of proximal femoral cortical hypertrophy after THA or endoprosthesis. Three patients were identified with femoral stem tip perforation through the posterolateral femoral shaft cortex. Known risk factors for perforation were osteoporosis, distal osteolysis causing late stem migration, and endoprosthesis after previous fracture/internal fixation. Two patients had dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of both hips. Follow-up was 16, 17 and 28 years. All three patients had clinically stable femoral components and none had thigh loading pain. All three patients had dense cortical bone buttressing the undersuface of the implant collar and a dense medial femoral cortex. Proximal femoral DXA regions of interest were 120 and 145% of the contralateral femur in the migration and post-fracture endoprosthesis patients, respectively. The endoprosthesis patient was revised to a THA 28 years post-operatively due to acetabular erosion. Excess dense cortical bone in the proximal femur was removed with a high speed bur and enabled revision with a primary non-cemented femoral component. Common factors which appeared to be necessary for a stable implant with proximal femoral densification included collared femoral components, stem alignment more vertical than the femoral neck axis, stem perforating the posterolateral femoral cortex, no inhibition of translation along the stem axis by cement or biological ingrowth, and not having the implant revised despite its unorthodox appearance. Long-term maintenance of the proximal femoral cortex after THA or endoprosthesis is possible. Paradoxically, a rare subset of the complication of femoral shaft perforation demonstrated by these anomalous cases suggested an alternative approach to the prevention of stress shielding bone loss after THA

Several methods have been used for proximal humeral reconstruction following tumour resection. None of these modalities allow the patient to regain his normal shoulder range of motion. Moreover, every modality has its advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of 2 reconstructive modalities that we are using in our institution for proximal humeral reconstruction; endoprosthesis and shoulder arthrodesis using a vascularised autograft This study included 48 patients diagnosed with malignant or benign aggressive tumours that required resection of their proximal humerus. They were divided into 2 groups according to the method of reconstruction. Group 1 included 22 patients with an average age of 20 years were reconstructed by shoulder arthrodesis using a free vascularised fibular graft (6) or a pedicled scapular crest graft (16). Group 2 included 26 patients with an average age of 26 years were reconstructed with an endoprosthesis. In group 1 the average follow up period was 88 months (range 12 to 184 months). The average functional outcome (according to the MSTS scoring system) was 25 points (range 19 – 28). The average abduction and forward flexion range of motion (scapulothoracic) was 40 degrees (range 20 -60). Complications included failed fixation (2), non union (1), infection (1) and temporary radial nerve palsy (2). In group 2 the average follow up period was 36 months (range 12 – 110). The average functional outcome was 24 points (range 20 – 27). The average abduction and forward flexion range of motion was 40 (range 30 –70). Complications included sublaxation (2), loosening (1) and infection (1). Reconstruction of the proximal humerus by arthrodesis or endoprosthesis yield similar functional outcome. Although endoprosthesis is a much more expensive modality, it does not provide any superior functional outcome over shoulder arthrodesis

The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and reveal the most common reasons of the endoprosthetic instability in patients with malignant bone tumors. From 1992 – 2008, 625/515 patients, endoprosthetic replacement of major joints were performed. The median age of the patients was 30.3 years (13 to 72 years). Aseptic instability was observed after 3/71(4.2%) humeral joint replacement out of total operations at this location, after 4/80 (5%) hip prosthesis, after 19/133 (14%) proximal tibial prostheses, after 44/299 (14.7%) distal femoral prostheses and after 2/37 (5.4%) total femur replacements. The retrospective analyses has shown that the reasons of instability were the following: aseptic loosening of the stems of endoprosthesis in 26 cases (24.4%), stem break in 31 (36.1%), endoprosthetic unit destruction in 10 (11.6%), untwistment of fixational screws in 10 (11,6%), migration of hip endoprosthesis components in 2 (2.3%) and endoprosthesis dislocation in 12 (14%). The timing of endoprosthetic instability ranged from 7 days to 12.2 years (average 26.2 months). Statistic analyses was performed in a group of patients with aseptic endoprosthesis instability developed after proximal tibia and distal femur resection. We conclude that the most frequent reason of aseptic instability was endoprosthetic stem break. The instability rate was actually lower among the patients who had underwent 5–10cm distal tibia resection comparing with the group of 10–15cm bone mass resection (p=0.05). Femoral resection enhanced the instability frequency comparing with proximal tibia resection in the group of 5–10cm bone mass resection (p=0.05)

Introduction: Total scapular resection causes a significant functional loss because of the sacrifice of the glenoid, which serves as a stable base for shoulder motion. The authors analyze their experience with two types of reconstructions following total scapular resection; suspension of the humeral head from the clavicle without endoprosthetic reconstruction of the scapula and endoprosthetic scapular reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Between 1979 and 1997, the authors treated 23 patients with scapular tumors that required total scapular resection. Patients were diagnosed with 14 bone and 9 soft-tissue tumors. Resection included total scapulectomy in 12 patients and enbloc resection of the scapula and humeral head in 11 patients. Reconstruction: All eleven patients who had resection of their humeral head underwent reconstruction of the humerus with endoprosthesis. Scapular endoprosthesis was further installed in 7 patients and suspension of the humeral head from the clavicle with a Dacron tape was performed in 16 patients (Suspension of the prosthetic humeral head from the clavicle – 4 patients; suspension of the native humeral head from the clavicle – 12 patients). Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the scapula was feasible only when the periscapular musculature was sufficient for endoprosthetic attachment and coverage. The scapular prosthesis was attached to the prosthetic humeral head with a Goretex® sleeve, which served as an artificial joint capsule. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years; follow-up included physical examination, radiological evaluation and functional evaluation according to the American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system. Results: Elbow range-of-motion and hand dexterity were similar in the two groups of patients. However, compared with patients who undergone humeral suspension, those who had scapular endoprosthesis had better abduction (60°–90° vs. 10°–20°) of the shoulder joint. Moreover, these patients had better cosmetic appearance of the shoulder girdle. There were no deep wound infections, prosthetic failures, or secondary amputations. Overall, 6 patients who had scapular prosthesis (86%) and 10 patients who had humeral suspension (62%) had a good-to-excellent functional outcome. Conclusions: The number of patients who underwent a scapular endoprosthetic reconstruction is small and does not allow a valid statistical analysis; however, the authors feel that scapular endoprosthesis reconstruction is associated with better functional and cosmetic outcomes, when compared to humeral suspension. The authors recommend reconstruction of the scapula with endoprosthesis when periscapular musculature, remaining after tumor resection allows attachment and coverage of the prosthesis

From 1992 on 2008, 615/515 patients underwent primary or revisional endoprosthetic replacement of major joints. In 51 patients (31 men & 20 women) modular system MUTARS (Implantcast, Germany) has been used. The median age was 23.3 years (15 to 52 years). MUTARS modular endoprosthesis has been used in 10 patients with deep infection of endoprosthetic bed as a revisional endoprosthetic replacement: 1 Total endoprosthetic replacement of femur, 5 Total knee joint replacement (2 for distal femoral defect and 3 for proximal tibial defect). In 3(27%) patients, we used newly patented silver ion coated MUTARS either after two stage treatment for infection of endoprosthetic bed or as a prophylaxis of endoprosthetic infection. In 1 patient (23 yrs), with 12cm limb length shortening, we used extensible MUTARS as a revisional endoprosthetic replacement. The following complications we observed: Instability of endoprosthesis – 3/51 (5.9%), deep endoprosthetic bed infection – 4/51 (7.8%). In comparison group, when using custom-made endoprosthesis, the frequency of infectious complications have made 60/574 (10.5 %), and instability of implants was observed in 79/574 (13.8 %) cases. Transition of using modular systems for primary and revisional endoprosthesis allows to reduce the level of instability from 13.8 % to 5.9 %. The quantity of infectious complications is also not great as in comparison with control group. For revisional endoprosthetic replacement, we think, the given modular system is optimal, for correcting limb length deficiency and restoration of basic function at patients. Use of silver ion coated modular implants is a promising method for treating deep endoprosthetic bed infection

Introduction and Objective. Curative resection of proximal humerus tumours is now possible in this era of limb salvage with endoprosthetic replacement considered as the preferred reconstructive option. However, it has also been linked with mechanical and non-mechanical failures such as stem fracture and aseptic loosening. One of the challenges is to ensure that implants will endure the mechanical strain under physiological loading conditions, especially crucial in long surviving patients. The objective is to investigate the effect of varying prosthesis length on the bone and implant stresses in a reconstructed humerus-prosthesis assembly after tumour resection using finite element (FE) modelling. Methods. Computed tomography (CT) scans of 10 humeri were processed in Mimics 17 to create three-dimensional (3D) cortical and cancellous solid bone models. Endoprostheses of different lengths manufactured by Stryker were modelled using Solidworks 2020. The FE models were divided into four groups namely group A consisting of the intact humerus and groups B, C and D composed of humerus-prosthesis assemblies with a body length of 40, 100 and 120 mm respectively and were meshed using linear 4-noded tetrahedral elements in 3matic 13. The models were then imported into Abaqus CAE 6.14. Isotropic linear elastic behaviour with an elastic modulus of 13400, 2000 and 208 000 MPa were assigned to the cortical bone, cancellous bone and prosthesis respectively and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3 was assumed for each material. To represent the lifting of heavy objects and twisting motion, a tensile load of 200 N for axial loading and a 5 Nm torsional load for torsional loading was applied separately to the elbow joint surface with the glenohumeral joint fixed and with all contact interfaces defined as fully bonded. A comparative analysis against literature was performed to validate the intact model. Statistical analysis of the peak von Mises stress values collected from predicted stress contour plots was performed using a one-way repeated measure of analysis of variance (with a Bonferroni post hoc test) using SPSS Statistics 26. The average change in stress of the resected models from the intact state were then determined. Results. The validation of the intact humerus displayed a good agreement with literature values. The peak bone stress occurred distally above the coronoid and olecranon fossa closer to the load application region in the intact and resected bone models with a significant amount of loading borne by the cortical bone, while the peak implant stress occurred at the bone-prosthesis contact interface under both loading conditions. Based on the results obtained, a statistically significant difference (p =.013) in implant stress was only seen to occur between groups B and C under tension. Results illustrate initiation of stress shielding with the bone bearing lesser stress with increasing resection length which may eventually lead to implant failure by causing bone resorption according to Wolff's law. The peak implant stress under torsion was 3–5 times the stress under tension. The best biomechanical behaviour was exhibited in Group D, having the least average change in stress from the intact model, 5% and 3.8% under tension and torsion respectively. It can be deduced that the shorter the prosthesis length, the more pronounced the effect on cortical bone remodelling. With the maximum bone and implant stresses obtained being less than their yield strength, it can be concluded that the bone-implant construct is safe from failure. Conclusions. The developed FE models verified the influence of varying the prosthesis length on the bone and implant stresses and predicted signs of stress shielding in longer endoprostheses. By allowing for 2 cm shortening in the upper extremity and post-surgical scarring, it is beneficial to err towards a shorter endoprosthesis

Frequent imaging after a completed multimodal therapy of osteosarcoma is recommended by therapy optimization studies to detect local or systemic tumor recurrence. Considering the low rates of local recurrence, regular local imaging has to be questioned. 150 patients with osteosarcoma were treated in our department between 1991 and 2005. The median age of patients with osteosarcoma was 17 years with a range of 4 – 79 years and a female:male ratio of 1:1.1. The primary tumors of 147 patients were treated surgically, while 3 patients refused to be operated. After a wide resection, a tumor endoprosthesis was implanted in 103 (70.1%) of the 147 patients, 16 (10.9%) patients underwent a Borggreve rotationplasty, a resection and biological reconstruction was implemented in 10 (6.8%) patients, while further 18 (12.2%) patients were amputated. The median follow up was 95 months. Local recurrences appeared in 2 (1.4%) patients which had been treated with a hemipelvectomy. After implantation of a tumor endoprosthesis, local recurrences were not observed. Postoperative complications observed after the implantation of a tumor endoprosthesis included infections (n=14; 13.6%), loosening, fractures and wearing of endoprotheses (n=7; 4.8%), luxation (n=1; 0.7%) as well as traumatic shaft fractures of involved bones (n=5; 3.4%). All complications included specific symptoms and were diagnosed outside the routine follow up. In conclusion, local radiological imaging after resection of an osteosarcoma and reconstruction with a tumor endoprosthesis as a routine examination should be questioned, however it is definitely indicated in patients with specific symptoms

Background: Extra-compartmental limb soft tissue sarcomas are notoriously difficult to treat. These tumours can exhibit macro or microscopic spread beyond the confines of normal anatomical barriers and require radical resection, often necessitating excision of bone as well as soft tissue. This will inevitably affect the patient’s functional outcome. The primary operations for these aggressive sarcomas include wide local excision of soft tissue and adjacent involved bone, radical resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction and amputation. Methods: 85 patients who underwent such an operation between 1995 to 2000 were reviewed and categorised according to whether they received wide local excision, endoprosthesis reconstruction or amputation. Patient demographics, sarcoma details, recurrence and survival rates were identified and compared between the three groups. Functional outcomes in the 45 patients still alive were assessed using TESS and MSTS scores. Results: Mean age was 61 years (range 8 to 92). There were 51 males and 34 females. Anatomical distribution was as follows: arm 26, leg 47, pelvis 8 and other 4. The commonest histology subtypes were MFH, leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma. 17 had wide local excision of bone and soft tissue, 32 underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction and 36 underwent primary amputation. Recurrence rates were highest in the endoprosthesis group at 19%. Five year survival was worst in the amputation group at 49%. Functional outcomes were highest in the wide local excision group, and similar in the other two surgical groups. Conclusions: Unsurprisingly survival is poorest in the primary amputee group because of the highly aggressive nature of these sarcomas, despite having the most radical treatment. The similar functional outcomes shown between endoprosthesis reconstruction and primary amputation may be influential when considering cases in which this decision is unclear and function is the main issue at stake