Implant removal is necessary in up to 25% of patients with plate osteosynthesis after proximal humeral fracture. Our new technique of arthroscopic implant removal offers all advantages of minimal invasive surgery. Additionally treatment of concomitant intraarticular lesions is possible. This study outlines the first results after arthroscopic implant removal in comparison with those of open implant removal. A prospective series of 40 consecutive treated patients had implant removal and arthrolysis after plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fracture. Implant removal was carried out due to limitation in range of movement, secondary implant dislocation and implant impingement. 30 patients (median age 63 (30–82) years) had arthroscopic, ten patients (median age 53 (34–76) years) had open implant removal. Median 10 months after implant removal subjective patient satisfaction, Constant Murley Score (CMS) and Simple Shoulder Test were determined. Arthroscopic implant removal showed comparable first results as open implant removal. There was no significant difference between CMS of both groups. The active shoulder abduction, flexion and external rotation improved significantly after arthroscopic and open implant removal. The simple shoulder test outlined advantages for the arthroscopic technique. After arthroscopic implant removal patients showed higher subjective satisfaction as well as faster pain reduction and mobilization. Analysis of perioperative data showed less blood loss in the group with arthroscopic implant removal. In 85% of patients with arthroscopic implant removal concomitant intraarticular lesions were observed and treated. The arthroscopic implant removal after plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures offers all advantages of minimal invasive surgery and comparable first results as the open implant removal. The subjective and objective satisfaction of patients is high. The technique can be applied and established by all arthroscopic trained shoulder surgeons

Olecranon Osteotomy is a common approach used in the management of intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Significant complication rates have been associated with this procedure, including non-union rates of 0–13% and implant removal rates between 12–86%. This study is a multicentre retrospective study involving the largest cohort of olecranon osteotomies in the literature, examining implant fixation types, removal rates and associated complications. Patients were identified between 2007 and 2017 (minimum one year follow-up) via Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) coding and ICD9/10 codes by our health region's data information service. CCI intervention codes were used to identify patients who underwent surgery for their fracture with an olecranon osteotomy. Reasons for implant removal were identified from a chart review. Our primary outcome was implant removal rates. Categorical data was assessed using Chi square test and Fischer's Exact test. Ninety-nine patients were identified to have undergone an olecranon osteotomy for treatment of a distal humerus fracture. Twenty patients had their osteotomy fixed with a plate and screws and 67 patients were fixed with a tension band wire. Eleven patients underwent “screw fixation”, consisting of a single screw with or without the addition of a wire. One patient had placement of a cable-pin system. Of patients who underwent olecranon osteotomy fixation, 34.3% required implant removal. Removal rates were: 28/67 for TBW (41.8%), 6/20 plates (30%), 0/1 cable-pin and 0/11 for osteotomies fixed with screw fixation. Screw fixation was removed less frequently than TBW p<.006. TBW were more commonly removed than all other fixation types p<.043. Screws were less commonly removed than all other fixation types p<.015. TBW were more likely to be removed for implant irritation than plates, p<.007, and all other implants p<.007. The average time to removal was 361 days (80–1503 days). A second surgeon was the surgeon responsible for the removal in 10/34 cases (29%). TBWs requiring removal were further off the olecranon tip than those not removed p=.006. TBWs were associated with an OR of 3.29 (CI 1.10–9.84) for implant removal if implanted further than 1mm off bone. Nonunion of the osteotomy occurred in three out of 99 patients (3%). K-wires through the anterior ulnar cortex did not result in decreased need for TBW removal. There was no relation between plate prominence and the need for implant removal. There was no association between age and implant removal. The implant removal rate was 34% overall. Single screw fixation was the best option for osteotomy fixation, as 0/11 required hardware removal, which was statistically less frequent than TBW at 28/67. Screw fixation was removed less frequently than TBW and screw fixation was less commonly removed than all other fixation types. Only 6/20 (30%) plates required removal, which is lower than previously published rates. Overall, TBW were more commonly removed than all other fixation types and this was also the case if hardware irritation was used as the indication for removal. Nonunion rates of olecranon osteotomy were 3%

Background. Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) has been accepted as a highly effective option for the treatment of medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Although pain in the medial joint line is significantly relieved after MOWHTO, some patients complain of pain over pes anserinus after the osteotomy, necessitating implant removal for pain relief. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to define the implant removal rate after MOWHTO due to patient complaints. Methods. 103 knees of 72 patients who underwent MOWHTO for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2018 with a follow-up of at least 24 months were enrolled in the study. Patients were evaluated with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain in the medial knee joint (VAS-MJ). All tests were performed before the surgery, at 12 months after surgery. VAS value for pain over pes anserinus (VAS-PA) was recorded at 12 months after MOWHTO and at 3 months after implant removal. Results. Mean follow-up was 31±5.4 months. TomoFix® medial high tibia plate (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) was used for the fixation of osteotomy in all cases. Significant improvement in KOOS, OKS and VAS-MJ were observed 12 months after MOWHTO. Average values of VAS-MJ and VAS-PA were 21.7±7.1 and 34±8.4, respectively. Implant removal was needed for 65 (63.1%) knees. There were no significant differences in regard of postoperative KOOS (p=0.134), OKS (p=0.287) and VAS-MJ (p=0.416) scores between patients for which implant removal was needed or not. VAS-PA value decreased significantly at 3 months after implant removal (p<0.001). Conclusion. A large portion of patients needed implant removal after MOWHTO to relieve pain over pes anserinus even if knee function was significantly improved. Lower profile plates may be preferred to avoid secondary implant removal surgery after MOWHTO

To assess the outcome and implant removal rate following surgical stabilisation of patella fracture. Sixty-seven patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of patella fracture between January 1999 and December 2004 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the adequacy of fracture stabilisation, fracture union and implant removal rate. Forty-three were men and 24 were women with a mean age of 49 years (ranged 14–90 years). Table below demonstrates the injury, fracture patterns and fixation methods. There were 3 open fractures and associated injuries were noted in 22 patients. All fractures united even though the fixation was inadequate in 46 patients. Two superficial infections responded to oral antibiotics. One patient had revision surgery at 6 weeks. Twenty-two patients required implant removal between 2 and 20 months (average 11 months) for implant related symptoms. Of the 22 (32.8%) patients requiring implant removal, 16/40 (40%) were less than 60 years and 6/27 (22.2%) were over 60 years. Mean follow up in asymptomatic patients was 8 months (3 to 18 months) and in patients with implant related problems was 17 months (10 to 36 months). Four patients were lost to follow up. Surgical stabilisation by current techniques demonstrated satisfactory fracture union. However, one in three required second surgery for implant related symptoms. In the under 60 years group, the implant removal rate increased to 40%. Newer techniques to avoid skin irritation need to be considered

During the period of January 1999 and August 2004 there was a policy in our institution of removal for metalwork from patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle fracture. We were not able to find any evidence in the literature as to whether implant removal confers long-term benefit or disability in these patients. Between January 1999 to August 2003, all patients who underwent ankle metalwork removal were reviewed. Most patients with mechanical symptoms were improved by implant removal. The two infections resolved. In those patients with pain, about two thirds found were improved. Following this study the practice in our institution has changed. We do not feel routine removal of metalwork is warranted unless there are specific indications; mainly mechanical symptoms, infection and pain. We are particularly keen to counsel patients from the latter category, that surgery may not resolve their symptoms

Aims: To determine whether in operatively treated scoliosis patients loss of correction after implant removal for late infection can be avoided by reinstrumentation. Methods: A retrospective review of 937 scoliosis patients treated by instrumented posterior fusion. Forty-þve (5%) developed late infection 2.9±1.7(0.5–8.0) yrs p.op. They were treated either by implant removal alone (HR, n=35) or by implant removal, re-instrumentation and augmentation of fusion (RI& F, n=10). Pseudarthrosis was found in 5 patients. Wound healing was uneventful in all patients of both groups after revision. There was no difference in mean Cobb angles between the groups neither before initial scoliosis operation nor before the revision. The mean follow-up time after revision was 4 years. Results: Radiographically, there was a signiþcant loss of correction after revision operation. At the time of reoperation mean curve correction was 40.4%, being 28.8% at follow-up (p< 0.05). There was a signiþcant difference in the radiographic outcome between the two revision techniques: In the RI& F-Group, the þnal thoracic Cobb angle correction. was 45.1% as compared to 20.8% in the HR-Group (p=0.03). Conclusions: One-stage hardware removal and re-instrumentation is a safe procedure and prevents loss of correction in the treatment of late infection after posterior instrumentation and fusion for scoliosis

Aim. Following clean (class I, not contaminated) surgical procedures, the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) should be less than approximately 2%. However, an infection rate of 12.2% has been reported following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of SSIs following removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee. Method. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included 500 patients from 19 hospitals with a follow-up of 6 months. Eligible were patients aged 18 to 75 years with previous surgical treatment for fractures below the knee who were undergoing removal of orthopedic implants. Exclusion criteria were an active infection or fistula, antibiotic treatment, reimplantation of osteosynthesis material in the same session, allergy for cephalosporins, known kidney disease, immunosuppressant use, or pregnancy. The intervention was a single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (cefazolin group, n = 228) or sodium chloride (0.9%; saline group, n = 242). Primary outcome was SSI within 30 days as measured by the criteria from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Results. Among 477 randomized patients (mean age, 44 years [SD, 15]; women, 274 [57%]; median time from orthopedic implant placement, 11 months [interquartile range, 7–16]), 470 patients completed the study. Sixty-six patients developed an SSI (14.0%): 30 patients (13.2%) in the cefazolin group vs 36 in the saline group (14.9%) (absolute risk difference, −1.7 [95% CI, −8.0 to 4.6], P = .60). Conclusions. In patients undergoing surgery for removal of orthopedic implants used for treatment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with placebo did not reduce the risk of surgical site infection within 30 days following implant removal

Aim

The treatment of fracture-related infections (FRI) focuses on obtaining fracture healing and eradicating infection to prevent osteomyelitis. Treatment guidelines include removal, exchange, or retention of the implants used according to the stability of the fracture and the time from the infection. Infection of a fracture in the process of healing with a stable fixation may be treated with implant retention, debridement, and antibiotics. Nonetheless, the retention of an intramedullary nail is a potential risk factor for failure, and it is recommended to exchange or remove the nail. This surgical approach implies additional life-threatening risks in elderly fragile hip fracture patients.

Our study aimed to analyze the results of implant retention for the treatment of infected nails in elderly hip fracture patients.

To describe the success rate of surgical debridement and primary closure without implant removal in the treatment of postoperative spinal wound infections with instrumentation. One thousand four hundred fifty two posterior instrumented fusions were performed between 2000 and 2006. A retrospective record review identified 63 cases with acute (< 6 weeks) postoperative infection (4.6%). The preoperative diagnosis included fracture (24), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (4), stenosis/degenerative spondylolisthesis (24), adult deformity (4), neuromuscular scoliosis (3), tumor (2), cervical myelopathy (2). All patients were treated with irrigation – debridement and closed suction drainage placement. Cultures were obtained, all wounds closed primarily and appropriate intravenous antibiotic treatments were initiated. The treatment protocol dictated the appropriate time to discontinue drains and antibiotics. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months. The majority of infections occurred during the early postoperative period (less than 2 weeks). Fifty-six (89%) resolved without recurrence with only one surgical debridement. Seven patients (11%) required a second operation for irrigation and debridement. Two patients (3%) required implant removal. Aggressive surgical treatment of postoperative spinal infections is essential for successful outcomes. Removal of implants is not necessary in acute infections. Delayed wound closure or second look operation could be avoided since primary closure offers accepted success rate

Aim

To date, the value of culture results after a debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for early (suspected) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) as risk indicators in terms of prosthesis retention is not clear. At one year follow-up, the relative risk of prosthesis removal was determined for culture-positive and culture-negative DAIRs after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. The secondary aim was to explore differences in patient characteristics, infection characteristics and outcomes between these two groups.

Aims. There are concerns regarding complications and longevity of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in young patients, and the few previous publications are mainly limited to reports on linked elbow devices. We investigated the clinical outcome of unlinked TEA for patients aged less than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 26 elbows of 21 patients with RA who were aged less than 50 years who underwent primary TEA with an unlinked elbow prosthesis. The mean patient age was 46 years (35 to 49), and the mean follow-up period was 13.6 years (6 to 27). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiological evaluation for radiolucent line and loosening, complications, and revision surgery with or without implant removal. Results. The mean MEPS significantly improved from 47 (15 to 70) points preoperatively to 95 (70 to 100) points at final follow-up (p < 0.001). Complications were noted in six elbows (23%) in six patients, and of these, four with an ulnar neuropathy and one elbow with postoperative traumatic fracture required additional surgeries. There was no revision with implant removal, and there was no radiological evidence of loosening around the components. With any revision surgery as the endpoint, the survival rates up to 25 years were 78.1% (95% confidence interval 52.8 to 90.6) as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusion. The clinical outcome of primary unlinked TEA for young patients with RA was satisfactory and comparable with that for elderly patients. A favourable survival rate without implant removal might support the use of unlinked devices for young patients with this disease entity, with a caution of a relatively high complication rate regarding ulnar neuropathy. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(1):19–26

Aim. To determine the rate of recurrence of coronal plane deformity in children treated with ‘guided growth’ using 8-plates, from the time of implant removal to skeletal maturity. Methods. Over a consecutive 5 year period between April 2008 and April 2013 we analysed our results of guided growth treatment using 8-plates to correct coronal plane lower limb deformity. Patients with neuromuscular disorders such as cerebral palsy were excluded. Deformity planning was performed using standardised techniques. Our standard practice is to remove the 8-plate and screws once deformity is corrected both clinically and radiologically. Patients were followed up until either skeletal maturity or recurrence, which necessitated reapplication of the 8-plate. We are aware of no study in which children treated with guided growth using 8-plates are followed up to skeletal maturity. Results. 267 patients were treated with 8-plates in our unit over this 5 year period. Of the patients in whom deformity was corrected and had subsequent plates removed, we identified 41 patients who have either reached skeletal maturity or had recurrence of deformity. Six patients required reapplication of the 8-plates implant. These were young and had skeletal dysplasia. Deformity parameters were analysed both clinically and radiologically in patients who have reached skeletal maturity and showed no recurrence, which necessitated further intervention. Conclusion. A higher proportion of younger patients, especially a sub-group with skeletal dysplasia had recurrence of deformity necessitating reapplication of the 8-plate device. In this group we recommend removal of only the metaphyseal screw once deformity is corrected. This would allow ease of reapplication if recurrence were to reoccur. Level of evidence: III

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS).

Introduction. Approximately 2,000 Skeletal transcutaneous osseointegration (STOI) procedures have been performed worldwide as of 2020, more than half of which have been performed by the Osseointegration Group of Australia using a press-fit technique with either ILP or OPL implant designs. Despite the consistently demonstrated clinical benefits, concerns regarding potential complications following STOI have slowed its widespread adoption. As more patients are followed for a longer period of time, longitudinal studies have confirmed complication rates are very acceptable, similar to those of total ankle and total elbow replacements. One of the major risk category is implant removal. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the complications and technical issues associated with transtibial osseointegration implant removal due to any cause. The focus here will be on the press-fit ILP and OPL implants, including the indications for removal and patient outcomes following removal. Materials & Methods. A review of our osseointegration registry between November 2010 and March 2022 was performed. Inclusion criteria were patients who have undergone removal of a transtibial osseointegration implant due to any cause. Selected patients either had a follow-up of at least two years or had their index osseointegration surgery at least two years prior to when the study was performed. Patients who have had osseointegration at other anatomic levels, and patients who underwent simultaneous total knee replacement with transtibial osseointegration were excluded from the registry search. Results. There were a total of 148 transtibial osseointegration procedures performed during the study period, with 97 (65.5%) performed in males and 51 (34.5%) performed in females. The average age at first stage osseointegration procedure is 50.4 years (range 16.8–87.9, SD 14.1). In the study cohort of 22 cases requiring implant removals, 12 (54.5%) were male and 10 (45.5%) were female. The average age at first stage osseointegration procedure in this cohort is 51.3 (range 37.4–82.6, SD 10.7) and average BMI 30.3 (range 21.9–40.9, SD 5.8). Although men comprised the majority of removals, women had a greater relative risk (Fisher exact test p=0.032). The average duration from time of STOI to removal was 2.6 years (range 0.1–6.8, SD 1.9) within this 11.5 year follow-up period. The most frequent indication was infection (54.6%, n=12) followed equally by pain (13.6%, n=3), aseptic loosening (13.6%, n=3) and implant fracture (13.6%, n=3), and lastly failure to integrate (4.6%, n=1). Conclusions. Of the 22 removals, 12 were reimplanted at the same anatomical level (10 were reimplanted within 6 months, 1 within 12 months, and 1 within 24 months). 11 of these cases currently wear their prosthetic legs for more than 13 hours daily. 1 case was recently reimplanted and still completing their loading program. Of the patients who were not reimplanted at the same anatomical level, 1 required proximal amputation with transfemoral osseointegration. 3 patients converted to traditional socket prostheses (TSP) due to pain, and 1 underwent proximal amputation and converted to TSP due to infection. 3 cases are currently awaiting transtibial osseointegration reimplantation, and 1 patient was deceased. 1 patient was lost to follow-up

Ligament reconstruction following multi-ligamentous knee injuries involves graft fixation in bone tunnels using interference screws (IS) or cortical suspensory systems. Risks of IS fixation include graft laceration, cortical fractures, prominent hardware, and inability to adjust tensioning once secured. Closed loop suspensory (CLS) fixation offers an alternative with fewer graft failures and improved graft-to-tunnel incorporation. However, graft tensioning cannot be modified to accommodate errors in tunnel length evaluation. Adjustable loop suspensory (ALS) devices (i.e., Smith & Nephew Ultrabutton) address these concerns and also offer the ability to sequentially tighten each graft, as needed. However, ALS devices may lead to increased graft displacement compared to CLS devices. Therefore, this study aims to report outcomes in a large clinical cohort of patients using both IS and CLS fixation. A retrospective review of radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes following ligament reconstruction from a Level 1 trauma centre was completed. Eligible patients were identified via electronic medical records using ICD-10 codes. Inclusion criteria were patients 18 years or older undergoing ACL, PCL, MCL, and/or LCL reconstruction between January 2018 and 2020 using IS and/or CLS fixation, with a minimum of six-month post-operative follow-up. Exclusion criteria were follow-up less than six months, incomplete radiographic imaging, and age less than 18 years. Knee dislocations (KD) were classified using the Schenck Classification. The primary outcome measure was implant removal rate. Secondary outcomes were revision surgery rate, deep infection rate, radiographic fixation failure rate, radiographic malposition, Lysholm and Tegner scores, clinical graft failure, and radiographic graft failure. Radiographic malposition was defined as implants over 5 mm off bone or intraosseous deployment of the suspensory fixation device. Clinical graft failure was defined as a grade II or greater Lachman, posterior drawer, varus opening at 20° of knee flexion, and/or valgus opening at 20° of knee flexion. Radiographic failure was defined when over 5 mm, 3.2 mm, and/or 2.7 mm of side-to-side difference occurred using PCL gravity stress views, valgus stress views, and/or varus stress views, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used. Sixty-three consecutive patients (mean age = 41 years, range = 19-58) were included. A total of 266 CLS fixation with Ultrabuttons and 135 IS were used. Mean follow-up duration was 383 days. Most injuries were KD type II and III. Graft revision surgery rate was 1.5%. Intraosseous deployment occurred in 6.2% and 17% had implants secured in soft tissue, rather than on bone. However, the implant removal rate was only 6.2%. Radiographic PCL gravity stress views demonstrated an average of 1.2 mm of side-to-side difference with 6.2% meeting criteria for radiographic failure. A single patient met radiographic failure criteria for collateral grafts. Mean Lysholm and Tegner scores were 87.3 and 4.4, respectively, with follow-up beyond one year. Both IS and CLS fixation demonstrate an extremely low revision surgery rate, a high rate of implant retention, excellent radiographic stability, and satisfactory patient-reported outcome scores. Incorrect implant deployment was seen in a total of 17% of patients, yet none required implant removal. A single patient required graft revision due to implant failure

The aim of this study was to report the restauration of the normal vertebral morphology and the absence of curve progression after removal the instrumentation in AIS patients that underwent posterior correction of the deformity by common all screws construct whitout fusion. A series of 36 AIS immature patients (Risser 3 or less) were include in the study. Instrumentation was removed once the maturity stage was complete (Risser 5). Curve correction was assessed at pre and postoperative, before instrumentation removal, just post removal, and more than two years after instrumentation removal. Epiphyseal vertebral growth modulation was assessed by a coronal wedging ratio (WR) at the apical level of the main curve (MC). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb was corrected from 53.7°±7.5 to 5.5º±7.5º (89.7%) at the immediate postop. After implants removal (31.0±5.8 months) the MC was 13.1º. T5–T12 kyphosis showed a significant improvement from 19.0º before curve correction to 27.1º after implants removal (p<0.05). Before surgery, WR was 0.71±0.06, and after removal WR was 0.98±0.08 (p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, the mean sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the T12-S1 segment was 51.2±21.0º. SRS-22 scores improved from 3.31±0.25 preoperatively to 3.68±0.25 at final assessment (p<0.001). In conclusion, fusionless posterior approach using a common all pedicle screws construct correct satisfactory scoliotic main curves and permits removal of the instrumentation once the bone maturity is reached. The final correction was highly satisfactory and an acceptable ROM of the previously lower instrumented segments was observed

According to the latest report from the German Arthroplasty Registry, aseptic loosening is the primary cause of implant failure following primary hip arthroplasty. Osteolysis of the proximal femur due to the stress-shielding of the bone by the implant causes loss of fixation of the proximal femoral stem, while the distal stem remains fixed. Removing a fixed stem is a challenging process. Current removal methods rely on manual tools such as chisels, burrs, osteotomes, drills and mills, which pose the risk of bone fracture and cortical perforation. Others such as ultrasound and laser, generate temperatures that could cause thermal injury to the surrounding tissues and bone. It is crucial to develop techniques that preserve the host bone, as its quality after implant removal affects the outcome of a revision surgery. A gentler removal method based on the transcutaneous heating of the implant by induction is proposed. By reaching the glass transition temperature (T. G. ) of the periprosthetic cement, the cement is expected to soften, enabling the implant to be gently pulled out. The in-vivo environment comprises body fluids and elevated temperatures, which deteriorate the inherent mechanical properties of bone cement, including its T. G. We aimed to investigate the effect of fluid absorption on the T. G. (ASTM E2716-09) and Vicat softening temperature (VST) (ISO 306) of Palacos R cement (Heraeus Medical GmbH) when dry and after storage in Ringer's solution for up to 8 weeks. Samples stored in Ringer's solution exhibited lower T. G. and VST than those stored in air. After 8 weeks, the T. G. decreased from 95.2°C to 81.5°C in the Ringer's group, while the VST decreased from 104.4°C to 91.9°C. These findings will be useful in the ultimate goal of this project which is to design an induction-based system for implant removal. Acknowledgements: Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – SFB/TRR-298-SIIRI – Project-ID 426335750

Aim. Arthroscopic interventions have revolutionized the treatment of joint pathologies. The appropriate diagnostics and treatment are required for infections after ligament reconstructions using non-resorbable material such as tendon grafts, anchors, and sutures, prone to biofilm formation. The infection rate is around 1% for knee and shoulder, while up to 4% for Achilles tendon reconstructions. Despite high number of these procedures worldwide, there is limited evidence about the best treatment protocol. Our study aimed to provide a general protocol for the treatment of small implants for soft tissue reconstruction. Method. Between 2019 and 2023, we treated 48 infections of ligament, meniscus, and tendon reconstructions out of 7291 related procedures performed in the same time period. Early infection (<30 days) were treated with an arthroscopic debridement and implant retention (DAIR), except Achilles tendons had open DAIR, while those with delayed or chronic infection (>30 days) were treated with extensive debridement and lavage combined with one-stage exchange (OSE) or implant removal. During surgery, at least 5 microbiological s and samples for histopathology were obtained. The removed material was sonicated. After surgery, all patients were one week on iv. antibiotics, followed by oral antibiofilm antibiotics for 6 weeks including rifampicin and/or a quinolone. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Failure was defined as the need for additional revision surgery after finished iv. antibiotic treatment. Results. Among 48 patients, 38 were early and 10 were late acute or chronic infections. The incidence of infection for our cohort was 0.7%. We observed 27 infections after ligament reconstruction of the knee, 15 of the shoulder, 5 of the ankle, and 1 infection of the elbow joint. 40 patients were treated with DAIR, 5 with OSE, and 3 with implant removal. We had 11 C. acnes, 10 S. aureus, 6 S. epidermidis, 2 P. aeruginosa, 2 S. lugdunensis, 10 mixed flora, and 3 culture-negative infections. 12 patients received antibiotics before surgery, and all culture-negative infections were related to this subgroup. We observed 2 failures, both in a combination of proximal tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. The success rate of our protocol was 96%. Conclusions. Prompt surgical treatment followed by 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment cured 96% of infections of small implants after reconstruction procedures of knee, shoulder, and ankle joints. Our study is the first to provide a treatment protocol for infections of small implants after ligament reconstruction procedures

Aim. Treatment recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) include surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy or staged revision. In surgical related foot and ankle infections (SR-FAI), implant removal will lead to instability. Debridement is difficult because the implant is outside the joint. Recommendations regarding PJI treatment can therefore not be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Method. We searched PubMed for the etiology and treatment of SR-FAI, taken into account the time of occurrence, causative microorganisms and surgical treatment options. We integrated this knowledge into a treatment algorithm for SR-FAI. Results. Within the first 6 weeks after surgery, it is difficult to distinguish acute osteomyelitis from surgical site infection in which infection is limited to the soft tissue. The predominantly causative microorganism is Staphylococcus aureus. No debridement can be performed, because of the diffuse soft tissue inflammation and the absence of a joint space. If early SR- FAI is suspected without signs of systemic symptoms, fistula or abscess, empirical antibiotic treatment covering Staphylococcus aureus is recommended. If there is suspicion of ongoing SR-FAI after 2 weeks of empirical treatment, samples for culture after an antibiotic free window should be obtained to identify the causative microorganisms. If SR-FAI is confirmed, but there is no consolidation yet, targeted antibiotic treatment is given for 12 weeks without initial implant removal. In all other cases, debridement and samples for culture should be obtained after an antibiotic free window. Staged revision surgery will be performed if there is still a nonunion. Conclusions. Treatment algorithm regarding PJI cannot be extrapolated to the treatment of SR-FAI. Until now, no treatment guideline for SR-FAI is available. We have introduced a treatment algorithm for the treatment of SR-FAI. The guideline will be validated during the next 2 years

Aims. This study aims to enhance understanding of clinical and radiological consequences and involved mechanisms that led to corrosion of the Precice Stryde (Stryde) intramedullary lengthening nail in the post market surveillance era of the device. Between 2018 and 2021 more than 2,000 Stryde nails have been implanted worldwide. However, the outcome of treatment with the Stryde system is insufficiently reported. Methods. This is a retrospective single-centre study analyzing outcome of 57 consecutive lengthening procedures performed with the Stryde nail at the authors’ institution from February 2019 until November 2020. Macro- and microscopic metallographic analysis of four retrieved nails was conducted. To investigate observed corrosion at telescoping junction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) were performed. Results. Adjacent to the nail’s telescoping junction, osteolytic changes were observed in bi-planar radiographs of 20/57 segments (35%) after a mean of 9.5 months (95% confidence interval 7.2 to 11.9) after surgery. A total of 8/20 patients with osseous alterations (40%) reported rest and ambulation pain of the lengthened segment during consolidation. So far, 24 Stryde nails were retrieved and in 20 (83%) macroscopic corrosion was observed at the nail’s telescoping junction. Before implant removal 11/20 radiographs (55%) of lengthened segments with these 20 nails revealed osteolysis. Implant retrieval analysis by means of SEM showed pitting and crevice corrosion. EDX detected chromium as the main metallic element of corrosion. Conclusion. Patients are exposed to the risk of implant-related osteolysis of unclear short- and long-term clinical consequences. The authors advocate in favour of an early implant removal after osseous consolidation. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):425–436