Aims

Ankle fracture fixation is commonly performed by junior trainees. Simulation training using cadavers may shorten the learning curve and result in a technically superior surgical performance.

Introduction: Peri-prosthetic fractures following hip resurfacing arthroplasty are difficult fractures to treat. The surgeon is faced with the task of either attempting to fix the fracture if feasible or revise the resurfacing implant to a conventional total hip replacement. Method & Results: Here we report of a novel way of fixing a peri-prosthetic fracture following resurfacing hip arthroplasty using Polyaxial locking plate fixation. A 53 year old man sustained a intertrochanteric fracture below his resurfacing metal on metal hip prosthesis following a fall. He had his hip resurfaced 3 years back for osteoarthritis in another hospital. He underwent surgery to fix the fracture using a polyaxial locking plate with no post-operative complications. He was mobilised non-weight bearing for the initial six weeks and weight bearing as tolerated thereafter. He went on to union and was moblising without any problems in three months time. His follow-up x-rays at 8 months showed fracture healed with no evidence of prosthesis problems. Discussion: There are various methods of treating a periprosthetic fracture of a well fixed resurfaced hip implant. The two types of management are open reduction and internal fixation and revision to a stemmed hip implant. These fractures can be fixed with cannulated hip screws, blade plate device or plating with screws avoiding the stem of the resurfacing prosthesis. We used the polyaxial locking plate device with good result thereby avoiding the need for revision surgery with its attendant risks. Using this implant is a useful alternative for these fracture patterns

Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability and clinical outcome of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation (EFLIF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. Methods. Two types of fixation systems were selected for finite element analysis and a dual cohort study. Two fixation systems were simulated to fix the fracture in a finite element model. The relative displacement and stress distribution were analysed and compared. A total of 71 consecutive patients with closed Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the treatment to which they chose: the EFLIF group and the ORIF group. The radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared. Results. The relative displacement of the EFLIF was less than that of the plate (0.1363 mm to 0.1808 mm). The highest von Mises stress value on the plate was 33% higher than that on the EFLIF. A normal restoration of the Böhler angle was achieved in both groups. No significant difference was found in the clinical outcome on the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle Hindfoot Scale, or on the Visual Analogue Scale between the two groups (p > 0.05). Wound complications were more common in those who were treated with ORIF (p = 0.028). Conclusions. Both EFLIF and ORIF systems were tested to 160 N without failure, showing the new construct to be mechanically safe to use. Both EFLIF and ORIF could be effective in treating Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. The EFLIF may be superior to ORIF in achieving biomechanical stability and less blood loss, shorter surgical time and hospital stay, and fewer wound complications. Cite this article: M. Pan, L. Chai, F. Xue, L. Ding, G. Tang, B. Lv. Comparisons of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation and open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures: Finite element analysis and clinical outcome. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:433–438. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.2000640

Aims. In contrast to operations performed for other fractures, there is a high incidence rate of surgical site infection (SSI) post-open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) done for tibial plateau fractures (TPFs). This study investigates the effect of induced membrane technique combined with internal fixation for managing SSI in TPF patients who underwent ORIF. Methods. From April 2013 to May 2017, 46 consecutive patients with SSI post-ORIF for TPFs were managed in our centre with an induced membrane technique. Of these, 35 patients were included for this study, with data analyzed in a retrospective manner. Results. All participants were monitored for a mean of 36 months (24 to 62). None were subjected to amputations. A total of 21 patients underwent two-stage surgeries (Group A), with 14 patients who did not receive second-stage surgery (Group B). Group A did not experience infection recurrence, and no implant or cement spacer loosening was noted in Group B for at least 24 months of follow-up. No significant difference was noted in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score (HSS) between the two groups. The clinical healing time was significantly shorter in Group B (p＜0.001). Those with longer duration of infection had poorer functional status (p＜0.001). Conclusion. Management of SSI post-ORIF for TPF with induced membrane technique combined with internal fixation represents a feasible mode of treatment with satisfactory outcomes in terms of infection control and functional recovery. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(7):380–387

Aims. Lower limb fractures are common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and represent a significant burden to the existing orthopaedic surgical infrastructure. In high income country (HIC) settings, internal fixation is the standard of care due to its superior outcomes. In LMICs, external fixation is often the surgical treatment of choice due to limited supplies, cost considerations, and its perceived lower complication rate. The aim of this systematic review protocol is identifying differences in rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion of extra-articular femoral and tibial shaft fractures in LMICs treated with either internal or external fixation. Methods. This systematic review protocol describes a broad search of multiple databases to identify eligible papers. Studies must be published after 2000, include at least five patients, patients must be aged > 16 years or treated as skeletally mature, and the paper must describe a fracture of interest and at least one of our primary outcomes of interest. We did not place restrictions on language or journal. All abstracts and full texts will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias and quality of evidence will be analyzed using standardized appraisal tools. A random-effects meta-analysis followed by a subgroup analysis will be performed, given the anticipated heterogeneity among studies, if sufficient data are available. Conclusion. The lack of easily accessible LMIC outcome data, combined with international clinical guidelines that are often developed by HIC surgeons for use in HIC environments, makes the clinical decision-making process infinitely more difficult for surgeons in LMICs. This protocol will guide research on surgical management, outcomes, and complications of lower limb shaft fractures in LMICs, and can help guide policy development for better surgical intervention delivery and improve global surgical care. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1020–1026

Introduction. Circular external fixators are fundamental to lower limb reconstruction, primarily in situations with a high risk of infection such as open fractures. During the Covid-19 pandemic, use of circular frames in our unit decreased, following departmental approval, due to resource management and in keeping with BOA guidelines as we opted to “consider alternative techniques for patients who require soft tissue reconstruction to avoid multiple operations”. These alternatives included the use of internal fixation (plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing) as a measure to reduce the number of hospital attendances for patients and to conserve resources. This change in practice has continued in part following the pandemic with the increased use of internal fixation in cases previously deemed unsuitable for such techniques. We present our experience of this treatment strategy in the management of complex lower limb injuries, focusing on outcomes and consider the lessons learnt. Materials & Methods. Data of patients with complex lower limb injuries treated before, during and after the pandemic were collected from our in-house trauma database, theatre records and follow up clinics. The rationale for choosing other techniques over a circular frame, the type of alternative technique used, the cost of such alternatives, the need for soft tissue reconstruction, time to recovery, complications and amputation rates were compared among groups. Results. These data suggest comparable outcomes between circular frames and alternative techniques can be achieved. A notable reduction in the number of circular frames applied during the review period was observed. Furthermore, frame fixation was associated with more frequent outpatient review and the associated implications for resource management. Conclusions. Conclusion: The Covid-19 pandemic has posed great challenges to the Trauma and Orthopaedic community, forcing us to be flexible by adopting alternative treatment methods to traditional circular external fixation. These alternatives have proven feasible and potentially more cost effective, prompting their adoption in the post pandemic era. However, this change of practice is not without potential consequences and continued investigation is warranted

Introduction and Objective. Postoperative management regimes vary following open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures. There is an evolving understanding that poorer outcomes could be associated with non-weight bearing protocols and immobilisation. Traditional non-weight bearing cast immobilisation may prevent loss of fixation, and this practice continues in many centres. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the complication rate and functional outcomes of early weight-bearing (EWB) versus late weight-bearing (LWB) following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. Materials and Methods. We performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis of controlled trials and comparative cohort studies. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched inclusive of all date up to the search time. We included all studies that investigated the effect of weight-bearing following adults ankle fracture fixation by any means. All ankle fracture types, including isolated lateral malleolus fractures, isolated medial malleolus fractures, bi-malleolar fractures, tri-malleolar fractures and Syndesmosis injuries, were included. All weight-bearing protocols were considered in this review, i.e. immediate weight-bearing (IMW) within 24 hours of surgery, early weight-bearing (EWB) within three weeks of surgery, non-weight-bearing for 4 to 6 weeks from the surgery date (or late weight-bearing LWB). Studies that investigated mobilisation but not weight-bearing, non-English language publications and tibial Plafond fractures were excluded from this systematic review. We assessed the risk of bias using ROB 2 tools for randomised controlled trials and ROBINS-1 for cohort studies. Data extraction was performed using Covidence online software and meta-analysis by using RevMan 5.3. Results. After full-text review, fourteen studies (871 patients with a mean age ranged from 35 to 57 years) were deemed eligible for this systematic review; ten randomised controlled trials and four comparative cohort studies. Most of the included studies were rated as having some concern with regard to the risk of bias. There is no important difference in the infection rate between protected EWB and LWB groups (696 patients in 12 studies). The risk ratio (RR) is 1.30, [95% CI 0.74 to 2.30], I. 2. = 0%, P = 0.36). Other complications were rare. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was the widely used patient-reported outcome measure after ankle fracture fixation among the studies. The result of the six weeks OMAS analysis (three RCTs) was markedly in favour of the early weight-bearing group (MD = 10.08 [95% CI 5.13 to 15.02], I. 2. = 0%P = <0.0001). Conclusions. The risk of postoperative complications is an essential factor when considering EWB. We found that the overall incidence of surgical site infection was 6%. When comparing the two groups, the incidence was 5.2% and 6.8% for the LWB and EWB groups. This difference is not clinically important. On the other hand, significantly better early functional outcome scores were detected in the EWB group. These results are not without limitations. Protected early weight-bearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures is potentially safe and improve short-term functional outcome. Further good-quality randomised controlled trials would be needed before we could draw a more precise conclusion

The incidence of hip fractures in the elderly is increasing. Minimally displaced and un-displaced hip fractures can be treated with either internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty. The aim was identifying the revision rate of internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty in patients 60 years or older with Garden I or II hip fractures and to identify risk factors associated with each method. A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2 Major Trauma Centres and 9 Trauma Units between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2020. Patients managed conservatively, treated with a total hip replacement and missing data were excluded from the study. 1273 patients were included of which 26.2% (n=334) had cannulated hip fixation (CHF), 19.4% (n=247) had a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and 54.7% (n=692) had a hemiarthroplasty. 66 patients in total (5.2%) required revision surgery. The revision rates for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty were 14.4%, 4%, 1.2% (p<0.001) respectively. Failed fixation was the most common reason for revision with the incidence increasing by 7-fold in the CHF group [45.8% (n=23) vs. 33.3% (n=3) in DHS; p<0.01]. The risk factors identified for CHF revision were age >80 (p<0.05), female gender (p<0.05) and smoking (p<0.05). The average length of hospital stay was decreased when using CHF compared to DHS and hemiarthroplasty (12.6 days vs 14.9 days vs 18.1 days respectively, p<0.001) and the 1 year mortality rate for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty was 2.5%, 2% and 9% respectively. Fixation methods for Garden I and II hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with a higher revision rate than hemiarthroplasty. CHF has the highest revision rate at 14.4% followed by DHS and hemiarthroplasty. Female patients, patients over the age of 80 and patients with poor bone quality are considered high risk for fixation failure with CHF. When considering a fixation method in such patients, DHS is more robust than a screw construct, followed by hemiarthroplasty

Abstract. Background. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rising and this is owed to the increased longevity that today's TKA implants allow for, as well as an aging population. These injuries are significant as they are related to increased morbidity and mortality. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all periprosthetic fractures around a TKA that presented to our NHS Trust between 2011 to 2020. Medical records were reviewed. Treatment, complications and mortality were noted. Results. 37 patients (34 females) with an average age of 84 (range 65–99) met the inclusion criteria for this study. 17 patients (45.9%) underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), eight patients (21.6%) underwent revision arthroplasty to a distal femoral replacement (DFR) and 12 patients (32.4%) were treated non-operatively. 10 (58.8%) of the 17 patients that were treated with ORIF were discharged from hospital to a rehabilitation facility rather than their usual residence. In comparison, 3 (37.5%) of the patients that were treated with a DFR were discharged to a rehabilitation facility. one-year mortality rate in the ORIF group was 29.4 compared to 12.5% in those that had a DFR. Conclusion. Revision arthroplasty using a DFR should be considered in patients with periprosthetic fractures around a TKR, as it is associated with lower mortality rates and higher immediate post-operative function

Introduction. Ankle fractures in the elderly have been increasing with an ageing but active population and bring with them specific challenges. Medical co-morbidities, a poor soft tissue envelope and a requirement for early mobilisation to prevent morbidity and mortality, all create potential pitfalls to successful treatment. As a result, different techniques have been employed to try and improve outcomes. Total contact casting, both standard and enhanced open reduction internal fixation, external fixation and most recently tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing have all been proposed as suitable treatment modalities. Over the past five years popular literature has begun to herald TTC nailing as an appropriate and contemporary solution to the complex problem of high-risk ankle fragility fractures. We sought to assess whether, within our patient cohort, the outcomes seen supported the statement that TTC has equal outcomes to more traditional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) when used to treat the high-risk ankle fragility fracture. Materials & Methods. Results of ORIF versus TTC nailing without joint preparation for treatment of fragility ankle fractures were evaluated via retrospective cohort study of 64 patients with high-risk fragility ankle fractures without our trauma centre. We aimed to assess whether results within our unit were equal to those seen within other published studies. Patients were matched 1:1 based on gender, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and ASA score. Patient demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, intra-operative and post-operative complications, discharge destination, union rates, FADI scores and patient mobility were recorded. Results. There were 32 patients within each arm. Mean age was 78.4 (TTC) and 78.3 (ORIF). The CCI was 5.9 in each group respectively with mean ASA 2.9 (TTC) and 2.8 (ORIF). There were two open fractures within each group. Median follow up duration was 26 months. Time to theatre from injury was 8.0 days (TTC) versus 3.3 days (ORIF). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day, one year or overall mortality at final follow up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis did however demonstrate that of those patients who died post-operatively the mean time to mortality was significantly shorter in those treated with TTC nailing versus ORIF (20.3 months versus 38.2 months, p=0.013). There was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups (46.9% versus 25%, p=0.12). The re-operation rate was twice as high in patients treated with TTC nailing however this was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference in the FADI scores at final follow up, 72.1±12.9 (TTC) versus 67.9±13.9 (ORIF) nor post-operative mobility status. Conclusions. Within our study TTC nailing with an unprepared joint demonstrated broadly equivalent results to ORIF in the management of high-risk ankle fragility fractures; this replicates findings of previous studies. We did however observe that mean survival was significantly shorter in the TTC group than those treated with ORIF. We believe this may have been contributed to by a delay to theatre due to TTC stabilisation being treated as a sub-specialist operation in our unit at the time. We propose that both TTC and ORIF are satisfactory techniques to stabilise the frail ankle fracture however, similarly to the other fragility fractures, the priority should be on an emergent operation in a timely fashion in order to minimise the associated morbidity and mortality. Further randomised control studies are needed within the area to establish definitive results and a working consensus

Internal fixation remains the treatment of choice for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, whereas, arthroplasty is preferred for displaced fracture patterns. Given technological advancements in implant design and excellent long-term outcomes, arthroplasty may provide improved outcomes for the treatment of non-displaced femoral neck fractures. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the orthopaedic literature (1) to investigate the outcomes of internal fixation for the treatment of non-displaced and minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients and (2) to compare the outcomes of patients treated with internal fixation to arthroplasty in this patient population. Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Manuscripts were included only if they contained (1) patients 60 years or older with (2) nondisplaced or minimally displaced (Garden I or II) femoral neck fractures (3) treated with internal fixation or arthroplasty or (4) separately reported outcomes in this patient population. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, patient reported outcomes, length of hospital stay, infection, and transfusions. An a priori decision was made to classify studies into comparative or non-comparative groups. Comparative studies directly compared arthroplasty to internal fixation in the specific study population while the non-comparative studies included separate cohorts of patients treated with arthroplasty or internal fixation. A fixed-effects model was used to quantitatively pool study outcomes. Twenty-five non-comparative studies were identified with a total of 22,020 patients, all of which were treated with internal fixation. The pooled incidence of reoperation after internal fixation was 14.4% (95% CI: 10.8 – 18.8). The incidence of mortality within one-year of injury was 14.4% (95% CI: 6.7 – 28.3), based on the reporting in 14 studies. Three comparative studies were identified with a total of 360 patients (128 treated with arthroplasty and 232 treated with internal fixation). All three studies reported reoperation rates. The overall risk of reoperation was 3.1% in the arthroplasty group compared to 9.5% in the internal fixation group (relative risk: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10 – 0.84, p= 0.02). Only two studies reported mortality. The relative risk of mortality in patients treated with arthroplasty compared to internal fixation was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.38 – 4.70, p= 0.003). Internal fixation of minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly is associated with a risk of reoperation and mortality that exceeds 14%. Treatment with arthroplasty may reduce the risk of reoperation by 70%. However, this benefit maybe tempered by a potential increased risk of mortality associated with arthroplasty in this patient population

Introduction. Femoral shaft fractures in children is a serious injury that needs hospitalization, with a high prevalence in the age group 6–8 years old. Various treatment options are available and with a comparable weight of evidence. Submuscular plating provides a dependable solution, especially in length-unstable fractures and heavier kids. We present a novel technique to facilitate and control the reduction intraoperatively, which would allow for easier submuscular plate application. Materials and Methods. We have retrospectively reviewed four boys and three girls; all were operated in one centre. Polyaxial clamps and rods were applied to the sagittally-oriented bone screws, the reduction was done manually, and the clamps were tightened after achieving the proper alignment in the anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy views. The submuscular plate was applied as described, then clamps and bone screws were removed. Results. The mean age at surgery was 13 years (range, 9–14). The mean body weight was 43.3 kg (range, 30–66). There were five mid-shaft fractures, one proximal third and one distal third. There were Four type A fractures, two type B and one type C. Four patients had road traffic accidents while three had direct trauma. The mean preoperative haemoglobin concentration 12.5 g/dl (range 11.3–13 g/dl). No blood transfusion was needed intraoperatively or postoperatively. The operative time averaged 122 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was one (range 1–4 days). The patients reported no pain at a mean of 1.5 weeks (range, one-three weeks). All fractures united at a mean of 8.7 weeks (range 6–12 weeks). No wound healing problems nor deep infections happened. The knee joint range of motion was full in all patients at six weeks postoperatively. There was no mechanical irritation from the inserted plate. At the final follow-up, all fractures united without malalignment nor length discrepancy. Conclusions. External fixator-assisted internal fixation of pediatric femoral fractures would facilitate the accuracy and control of fracture reduction and allow minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis. Our study has shown a decrease in operative time, and an accompanying reduction in length of inpatient stay, prolonged need for analgesia and post-operative rehabilitation

Distal radius fractures are the most common adult fractures, yet there remains some uncertainty surrounding optimal treatment modalities. Recently, the rate of operative treatment of these injuries has been increasing, however, predictors of outcomes in patients treated surgically remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate independent predictors of 30-day readmission and complications following internal fixation of distal radius fractures. Patients ≥18 years who underwent surgical intervention for distal radius fractures between 2005 and 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) using procedural codes. Patient demographics, as well as 30-day readmission, complication, and mortality rates were ascertained. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of 30-day outcomes while adjusting for patient age, sex, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class, functional status, smoking status, comorbidities, and Body Mass Index (BMI). A total of 10,051 patients were identified (average age 58 ±16). All patients received open reduction and internal fixation with no cases of external fixation identified in the data set. Included fractures were 37% extraarticular and 63% intraarticular. Within 30-days of initial fixation 143 (1.42%) patients were readmitted to the hospital, 71 patients experienced a complication, and 18 (0.18%) patients died. After adjusting for relevant covariables, current smoking increased the odds of readmission by 1.73 (95%Confidence interval [95%CI] 1.15 – 2.50), ASA class III/IV vs. I/II increased the odds of readmission by 2.74 (95%CI 1.85 – 4.06), and inpatient surgery vs. outpatient surgery increased the odds of readmission by 2.10 (95%CI 1.46 – 3.03). Current smoking also increased the odds of complications by 2.26 (95%CI 1.32 – 3.87), while ASA class III/IV increased it by 2.78 (95%CI 1.60 – 4.85), inpatient surgery increased it by 2.26 (95%CI 1.37 – 3.74), and dependent functional status increased it by 2.55 (1.16 – 5.64). In conclusion, patients with severe systemic disease, current smokers and patients undergoing inpatient surgery are at risk for 30-day readmissions and complications following operative treatment of distal radius fractures. In addition, patients with dependent functional statuses are more likely to experience a complication within 30-days

Aim. Previous studies of primary internal fixation of infected non-unions have reported high failure rates. Local antibiotic carriers and coatings have been advocated to reduce infection around implants and allow bone healing. We evaluated the effect of a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite antibiotic-loaded composite on bone healing and the eradication of infection in combination with internal fixation. Method. Twelve cases of established infected non-union, with segmental bone loss of up to 1cm were treated using a multidisciplinary protocol. This included; excision, deep sampling, stabilisation, local and systemic antibiotics, and soft-tissue closure. We treated 5 femurs, 4 humeri, 1 tibia and 2 periarticular non-unions at the ankle. Mean age was 59.8 years (34–75) and 9 patients had systemic co-morbidities (C-M Type B hosts). 9 patients had single stage surgery, with 5 IM Nails and 4 plates. Three patients had planned second stage internal fixation after external fixation to correct deformity. Staph. aureus was the commonest pathogen (5 cases) with polymicrobial infection in 3 cases. Results. All 12 patients were infection-free at a mean follow-up of 23 months (range 13–34 months). Union was achieved in 11/12 (92%) with the primary surgery alone. The single failure was the tibial case, who remains with an infection-free, stiff non-union. Conclusion. This protocol offered good results, mainly with a single stage treatment. Primary internal fixation was possible in 9 cases, without recurrent infection. The combination of excision of infected dead bone and a high level of local antibiotics above the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Biofilm Eradication Concentration levels for common bacteria, allowed a high success rate in these difficult cases

Purpose of the study:. To determine the outcomes of cases converted from an external fixator to an internal fixation device in the management of limb reconstructions and deformity corrections. Method:. A retrospective review of 18 patients, that underwent a conversion procedure to internal fixation following long term external fixation use, was done. This comprised 24 limbs. Inclusion criteria: All cases of long term external fixator use converted to internal fixation over a 5 year period. Average external fixation time, pin site care, conversion timing, surgical device used as well as outcome were documented. Results:. The mean treatment time in an external fixator was 185 days (61–370). The reasons for conversion included patient dissatisfaction, pin tract sepsis and a refracture. The conversion procedures included 8 intramedullary nail fixations and 16 plate and screw fixations. An acute conversion was identified as an internal fixation that was done in the same sitting as external fixator removal. A delayed conversion was any internal stabilisation that was done thereafter. In total, the complication rate associated with conversion to internal fixation following long term external fixation was 25%, mainly due to persistent non-union or sepsis. In the 8 conversions to intramedullary nails, 7 were acute: 4 had good outcomes with sepsis free union being achieved. 3 had poorer outcomes with a non-union and 2 amputations being documented. The single delayed nailing achieved union. In the 16 conversions to plate fixation, 13 achieved union. 10 were acute conversions and 3 were delayed. The remaining 3 that developed complications included 2 acute conversions with septic non-unions and a single delayed conversion which resulted in sepsis. Conclusion:. Conversion of an external fixator to an internal fixator in a non-acute reconstructive setting has a 75% success rate. In the acute conversion group (19 cases), plate and screw fixation had a superior outcome. In the delayed conversion group (5 cases), intramedullary fixation was favoured

Background: The importance of HIV in trauma has been poorly investigated. There’re few reports in the literature on the effects of HIV on fracture healing, those that there are involve small numbers. Many surgeons have concerns about both internal and external fixation in these patients. Some of the most recent published studies have suggested a 4 fold increase in infection rates in internal fixation of open fractures (small series 39 patients, 12 of whom HIV positive). In our hospital we have prospectively reviewed the outcomes of our open fractures treated by internal fixation, to see if HIV is a significant risk factor for wound infection and non union. Methods: All patients undergoing internal fixation for open fractures were entered into a database. Patients were managed along predesigned protocols, under the care of one consultant to try and standardise care. Patients were followed up in a dedicated clinic. 96% 2 month follow up and 84% 3 month follow up was obtained. Results: Over a 9 month period 102 open fractures were treated with internal fixation. 23% of patients were HIV positive and 14% declined to be tested. CD4 counts ranged from 131–862, mean of 387. The superficial wound infection rate was 13% in HIV positive patients and 15% in HIV negative patients. Sub group analysis suggested that HIV positive patients with low CD4 counts and grade 1 injuries were significantly more likely to develop wound infections (50%) than controls (12%), p value=0.02. Grade 1 injuries were not managed with urgent debridement, under hospital guidelines, and had an average delay to theatre of 4 days. Rates of non union were 4% and 2% in the HIV positive/negative groups respectively. Conclusions: This series is the largest prospective study in the literature. Our data suggests that:. The risks of acute infection in open fractures fixed by internal fixation in HIV positive individuals may not be as high as some previous studies have suggested;. Open fractures in HIV positive patients can be managed to union with internal fixation;. That in may not be appropriate to leave grade 1 injuries in HIV positive patients for non urgent debridement/fixation, as previous studies have suggested. Discussion: We feel that the current dogma of denying such patients internal fixation, is no longer appropriate. Although this study does not provide a direct comparison between differing Methods: of fixation, it provides the strongest evidence available in the literature, that internal fixation should be considered as a treatment option in these patients. We are currently awaiting the result of long term follow up looking at rates of delayed sepsis in these patients

Triple arthrodesis is the most effective treatment resource for restoring shape and stability to the hind-foot. It is used in order to achieve a plantigrade foot, aligned, stable and painless, in the treatment of various pathologies. However, it has the effect of changing the dynamic mobility of the foot and diminishes the adapting ability to uneven ground, influencing the outcome. Opinions differ on the necessity of internal fixation to maintain the proper alignment of the hind-foot and improve consolidation, influencing the results. The authors reviewed the patients who underwent triple arthrodesis between 01/01/1998 and 31/12/2008. Of a total of 46 patients 28 were reviewed, corresponding to 29 feet that underwent 36 interventions (7 recurrences). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not the placement of internal fixation. They were evaluated according to the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot score and correlated with the radiologic result. The most frequent indications for surgery were osteoarthrosis of the tarsus and sequelae of fractures of the calcaneus. In the group without fixation 68% had radiological signs of consolidation. 24% required revision for non consolidation. In the group with internal fixation there was 72.7% consolidation and 9.1% required revision surgery. Bone graft was more often used in internal fixation group (72.7% vs 40%). Group without fixation vs group with internal fixation:. AOFAS mean score: 74.5% vs 61.6%, patients without pain: 50% vs 20%; plantigrade foot with good alignment: 66.7% vs 40% without pain: 50% vs 20%; tibiotarsal arthritis: 48% vs 63.6%; Lisfranc arthrosis: 44% vs 63.6%. There is a higher rate of consolidation in the group setting. However, the functional outcome seems to be better in the group without fixation. Fixation seems to be associated with better consolidation. The functional outcome is related to a plantigrade and well aligned foot

Background. Studies have compared open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with fibular nail fixation (FNF) and shown reduced wound complications with minimal difference to PROMS in the short term. Our aim is to compare long-term outcomes for unstable ankle fractures at 10 year follow up. Methods. Patients from a previously conducted RCT were contacted at a minimum of 10 years post intervention at a single study centre. Case notes were reviewed, and patient reported outcome measures acquired at 10 years. Results. Ninety-nine patients were included (48 FNF and 51 ORIF). After 10 years 75% (33/44) of patients in the FNF group required no further follow up versus 81% (39/48) in the ORIF group. Radiographically at 2 years post-injury, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for development of osteoarthritis (p=0.851). There was one tibio-talar fusion in each group secondary to osteoarthritis, but no statistically significant difference in overall re-operation rate (p=0.518). Fifty-one percent (n=50) of patients have so far returned patient reported outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years (Fibular nail n=23, plate fixation n=27). No significant difference was found between groups for the mean scores of Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (FNF 84.78 vs ORIF 84.07; p=0.883), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) (FNF 89.54 vs ORIF 96.47; p=0.112), Euroqol-5D Index (FNF 0.88 vs ORIF 0.87; p=0.701) and Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Score (FNF 77.30 vs ORIF 77.52; p=0.859). Conclusion. The current study illustrates that both methods of treatment result in a satisfactory long-term outcome with no difference in late complications or PROM scores at up to 10 years in patients under 65 years old, although the study is currently under powered

Objective. Failures of internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures pose great challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Hip arthroplasty can be a remedy for such failures, however, the selection of femoral stem length is controversial. This study aims to report our experience of managing failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures with standard femoral stem arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective review of patients who were managed with hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures in the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, P.R. China between January 2001 to December 2013 was performed. Patients’ age, gender, pre- and postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), femoral stem types and surgical outcomes were traced and analyzed. Results. 14 patients were included. The average age at the time of internal fixation and hip arthroplasty was 74.6 years old (Range, 56–89) and 75.8 years old (Range, 58–90), respectively. The time duration between internal fixation and hip arthroplasty ranged from 3 to 26 months. 5 were total hip arthroplasty while 9 were hemiarthroplasty. 4 were implanted with long femoral stems while 10 with standard stems, including 4 cementless (SL-PLUS, Smith & Nephew)and 6 cemented stems. Standard femoral stems were defined as ones that are designed to be used in primary hip replacement, with the length of which ranging from 120 to 140mm. The distal ends of these stems did not exceed the distal screw hole levels of 2 cortical diameters. After a mean follow-up time of 6.4 years (Range, 1–13), 2 patients lost to follow-up and 2 died of non-surgically related diseases. For the 8 cases with standard stems, at the latest follow-up, no periprosthetic fractures or periprosthetic joint infections were observed. A total of 3 hip dislocations happened in 2 patients but were managed successfully with manipulative reduction followed by hip brace. The HHS score increased from an average of 35.6 preoperatively to 79.4 after surgery. Conclusions. Hip arthroplasty can be performed as revision for failed internal fixation after intertrochanteric fractures. Use of standard femoral stems is less invasive, reduces expenditure and can also achieve similar satisfactory clinical outcomes as long femoral stems. However, the long-term clinical outcomes required further follow-up

Aim: This retrospective study presents the results of humeral pseudarthrosis management, in our clinic, during the period 1997–2002. Material: 21 patients with humeral pseudarthrosis were treated during this period. 7 were men, with an average age of 48, 6 (range 22–63) and 14 were women, with an average age of 63, 3 (range 42–80). The initial treatment in 19 cases was conservative and in 2 cases surgical (internal fixation with plate – screws or intramedullary nailing). The average time of the humeral pseudarthrosis management was 5,9 months (4–10 months).3 pseudarthrosis were oligotrophic and 18 atrophic. Method: All patients underwent an open reduction, internal fixation and bone grafting (autografts and/or allografts).In humeral shaft pseudarthrosis a wide plate was applied, while in superior humeral metaphysis pseudarthrosis, a T-plate. In all cases impaction of the fracture edges was achieved. Results: The average follow-up was 40,2 months (range 4–68 months).Union was achieved in all cases in an average of 2,8 months (range 2–8 months). Direct postoperative mobilisation and physical therapy was applied in 20 cases and only in 1 case a “Sarmiento” splint was applied for 3 weeks. In 2 cases a postoperative haematoma presented. In 1 case a pre-existed paresis of the radial nerve after the initial treatment of the fracture with internal fixation, came back 3 months after the management of pseudarthrosis and the release of the nerve. All patients’ revealed good functional rehabilitation, about 85–90% compared with the normal arm. Arm shortening in no case was greater than 2 cm. Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation is the treatment of choice in the management of the humeral pseudarthrosis. The impaction of the fracture edges into each other strengthens significantly the stability of the fracture and promotes union