Aims. This Delphi study assessed the challenges of diagnosing soft-tissue knee injuries (STKIs) in acute settings among orthopaedic healthcare stakeholders. Methods. This modified e-Delphi study consisted of three rounds and involved 32 orthopaedic healthcare stakeholders, including physiotherapists, emergency nurse practitioners, sports medicine physicians, radiologists, orthopaedic registrars, and orthopaedic consultants. The perceived importance of diagnostic components relevant to STKIs included patient and external risk factors, clinical signs and symptoms, special clinical tests, and diagnostic imaging methods. Each round required scoring and ranking various items on a ten-point Likert scale. The items were refined as each round progressed. The study produced rankings of perceived importance across the various diagnostic components. Results. In Round 1, the study revealed widespread variability in stakeholder opinions on diagnostic components of STKIs. Round 2 identified patterns in the perceived importance of specific items within each diagnostic component. Round 3 produced rankings of perceived item importance within each diagnostic component. Noteworthy findings include the challenges associated with accurate and readily available diagnostic methods in acute care settings, the consistent acknowledgment of the importance of adopting a patient-centred approach to diagnosis, and the transition from divergent to convergent opinions between Rounds 2 and 3. Conclusion. This study highlights the potential for a paradigm shift in acute STKI diagnosis, where variability in the understanding of STKI diagnostic components may be addressed by establishing a uniform, evidence-based framework for evaluating these injuries. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):984–991

Aims. To explore key stakeholder views around feasibility and acceptability of trials seeking to prevent post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) following knee injury, and provide guidance for next steps in PTOA trial design. Methods. Healthcare professionals, clinicians, and/or researchers (HCP/Rs) were surveyed, and the data were presented at a congress workshop. A second and related survey was then developed for people with joint damage caused by knee injury and/or osteoarthritis (PJDs), who were approached by a UK Charity newsletter or Oxford involvement registry. Anonymized data were collected and analyzed in Qualtrics. Results. Survey responses (n = 19 HCP/Rs, 39 PJDs) supported studies testing pharmacological agents preventing PTOA. All HCP/Rs and 30/31 (97%) PJDs supported the development of new treatments that improved or delayed knee symptoms and damage to knee structure. PJDs thought that improving structural knee damage was more important than knee symptoms. Both groups found studies more acceptable as expected future benefit and risk of PTOA increased. All drug delivery routes were acceptable. Workshop participants (around n = 60) reflected survey views. Discussions suggested that stratifying using molecular testing for likely drug response appeared to be more acceptable than using characteristics such as sex, age, and BMI. Conclusion. Our findings supported PTOA drug intervention studies, including situations where there is low risk of disease, no expected benefit of treatment, and frequent treatment administration. PJDs appeared less risk-averse than HCP/Rs. This work reinforces the benefits of consensus and involvement work in the co-creation of PTOA drug trial design. Involvement of key stakeholders, such as PJDs with different risks of OA and regulatory representatives, are critical for trial design success. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(9):513–524

Abstract. Introduction. A spotlight has been placed upon virtual assessment of patients during the coronavirus pandemic. This has been particularly prevalent in the assessment of acute knee injuries. In this study we aim to assess the accuracy of telephone triage, confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute knee injuries. Methods. Case records of patients triaged by telephone in the acute knee clinic at Leeds General Infirmary were analysed. Provisional diagnoses made following telephone triage were compared to radiological diagnoses made on subsequent MRI scans. Diagnostic accuracy was compared between those patients assessed virtually and those assessed in face-to-face clinics. Results. 1160 patients were referred to the acute knee injury clinic during the study period. 587 of these were triaged telephonically. MRI scans were requested for 107 (18%) virtually reviewed patients. Of these patients, 92 (79%) had an MRI scan requested after making a provisional diagnosis over the phone. Of the MRI requests made after virtual consultation, there was a 75% diagnostic accuracy of the pre-imaging diagnosis. Of the patients seen in face-to-face appointments, a diagnostic accuracy of 73% was observed. Conclusion. Virtual assessment can provide an efficient and cost-effective establishment of diagnosis of acute knee injuries whilst reducing hospital attendance. A combination of virtual and in-person clinics may allow quicker access to specialist opinion and therefore reduce patient waiting times

Most previous studies investigating autograft options (quadriceps, hamstring, bone-patella-tendon-bone) in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are confounded by concomitant knee injuries. This study aims to investigate the differences in patient reported outcome measures and revision rates for quadriceps tendon in comparison with hamstring tendon and bone-patella-tendon-bone autografts. We use a cohort of patients who have had primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injuries. All patients from the New Zealand ACL Registry who underwent a primary arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with minimum 2 year follow-up were considered for the study. Patients who had associated ipsilateral knee injuries, previous knee surgery, or open procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and MARX scores at 2 years post-surgery. Secondary outcomes were all-cause revision and time to revision with a total follow-up period of 8 years (time since inception of the registry). 2581 patients were included in the study; 1917 hamstring tendon, 557 bone-patella-tendon-bone, and 107 quadriceps tendon. At 2 years, no significant difference in MARX scores were found between the three groups (2y mean score; 7.36 hamstring, 7.85 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 8.05 quadriceps, P = 0.195). Further, no significant difference in KOOS scores were found between the three groups; with the exception of hamstring performing better than bone-patella-tendon-bone in the KOOS sports and recreation sub-score (2y mean score; 79.2 hamstring, 73.9 bone-patella-tendon-bone, P < 0.001). Similar revision rates were reported between all autograft groups (mean revision rate per 100 component years; 1.05 hamstring, 0.80 bone-patella-tendon-bone, 1.68 quadriceps, P = 0.083). Autograft revision rates were independent of age and gender variables. Quadriceps tendon is a comparable autograft choice to the status quo for primary ACL reconstruction without concomitant knee injury. Further research is required to quantify the long-term outcomes for quadriceps tendon use

Introduction Knee injuries are a common presentation to Accident and Emergency departments. Often many injuries that are referred are minor as a result of the difficulty in initial assessment, and cause an unnecessary increase in workload in Orthopaedic clinics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current practice at our Knee Injury Clinic and to implement changes to make the service more efficient and effective. It forms a completed audit cycle of current practice. Material and methods Part I: We assessed all referrals from our Accident & Emergency department in two separate 4 month periods to the Acute Knee Injury Clinic according to the following criteria (which need fulfilling for referral)-. Recent history of injury associated with one or more of the following:. Acute haemarthrosis. Clinical instability. Disproportionate pain. Locking. Referrals were assessed as fulfilling or not fulfilling the criteria, and also as to the ultimate diagnosed pathology. Part II: From the results of these two audits, a multidisciplinary treatment proforma was created and distributed to Accident and Emergency. This included physiotherapy as a primary treatment option. Referrals were then reassessed as in the previous audits for a 4-month period. Results and conclusions The Acute Knee Injury Pro-forma resulted in a 15% reduction in referrals not fulfilling the criteria (p=< 0.05). This equates to a reduced workload due to inappropriate referrals, while significant injuries such as Cruciate rupture are picked up due to the sensitivity of the criteria. There was a significant increase in patients referred directly from Accident and Emergency to the physiotherapy department, which means minor injuries receive physiotherapy earlier than if they initially came to clinic. The proforma was well received by the junior doctors in Accident and Emergency due to its simplicity. Overall the use of the proforma has improved the standard of care at our unit

Introduction:. Measurement of ankle brachial pressure index is an easy screening test to perform in patients presenting with an acute knee injury. According to Nicardi et al recognition of vascular injury is particularly challenging because vascular compromise may not be immediately associated with clinical signs of ischemia. The aim of the study is to correlate the values of ABPI measurements to CT angiograms and clinical outcome in high energy knee trauma. Materials and Methods:. We reviewed the records of patients admitted to our unit following high energy knee trauma during the period Nov 2012 to Dec 2013. The orthopaedic injuries sustained were 11 knee dislocations, 5 supracondylar femur fractures, 3 high energy tibia plateau fractures (Schatzker 5 and 6) and 4 gunshot injuries. From the records we recorded the nature of the orthopaedic injury, the ABPI, the CT angiogram and the clinical outcome. We excluded all patients with insufficient records and previous vasculopathy. After these exclusions, 23 patients were enrolled for the study. Analysis of the data involved calculating of basic descriptive statistics, including proportional and descriptive measures. T-tests (one-sample and independent) and chi-square tests of independence were employed to investigate the relationship between ABPI and CT angiogram and clinical outcomes. Throughout the statistical analysis cognisance is taken of the relative small sample, and relevant test adjustments made. Results:. A total of 5 of the 23 patients had a significant vascular injury that required vascular intervention. Three patients underwent vascular repair and orthopaedic fixation. One patient had an occult vascular injury and presented with a necrotic limb three days after admission. His delayed CT demonstrated arterial cut off. This patient later went on to have an amputation. The fifth patient presented 12 days post knee dislocation with reduced pulses but the leg was still viable. In these five patients the ABPI value ranged from 0.3 to 0.65. In the remainder the ABPI ranged from 0.91 to 1.4. These 18 patients had a CT angiogram with normal flow and no intimal tears. Conclusion:. In all the patients with vascular sequelae from high energy knee injuries and dislocation the initial ABPI measurement performed well as a screening test for vascular injuries. It can therefore be recommended as a practical investigation in the initial evaluation of knee injuries that has cost and time saving benefits

Radiographs are frequently ordered following acute knee injury. However, it is suggested that only 6 % of patients with a knee trauma have a fracture. Decision rules such as the Ottawa rules and the Pittsburgh rules have been developed to reduce the unnecessary use of radiographs following knee injury. We prospectively reviewed all acute knee injury patients who were referred to our clinic from the emergency department over a 3 month period. The reason for ordering radiographs was analysed. The Ottawa and the Pittsburgh rules were applied to individual patients to evaluate the need for radiographs. In patients with a diagnosis of fracture, the accuracy of the Ottawa and the Pittsburgh rules was studied. A total, of 106 patients were referred to the acute knee clinic from the emergency department. 95.28 % (101) of these patients had radiographs of their knee in the emergency department. Five (4.72%) patients had a fracture of their knee and all these cases, the Ottawa and the Pittsburgh knee rules for ordering radiographs was fulfilled. In a vast majority of cases without any fracture, the clinical reason for ordering radiographs was not clear. Using the Ottawa rules for knee radiography 25.47% (27) radiographs could be avoided without missing a fracture. Using the Pittsburgh rules, 30.19 % (32) knee radiographs could be avoided without missing a fracture. The Ottawa and the Pittsburgh rules have a high sensitivity for the detection of knee fractures. Use of these rules can aid efficient clinical evaluation of the knee in an emergency situation without adverse clinical outcome. They may also have an implication on reducing the work load of radiology department and reduction of health costs

Introduction. Knee injuries are common amongst footballers. The aim of this study was to establish frequency and variation of knee injuries within one English Premier League (EPL) professional football club over two seasons, to assess number of days missed due to injury, and analyse current treatment regimen for each injury type. Method. Data was collected prospectively for injuries suffered by players between 2009 and 2011, spanning two EPL seasons at one EPL club. Demographics were recorded along with various factors influencing injury, including playing surface, pitch condition, dominant side, type of injury, ability to continue playing, and mechanism of injury. Time taken for return to play, and treatment received was recorded. Results. 35 injuries occurred that were severe enough to cause players to miss at least one competitive match. The commonest injury was to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in 34%. Patella tendon injuries were seen in 29%, other injuries included meniscus tears, ACL ruptures, and osteochondral defects. All grade II MCL Injuries received sclerosant injections. 40% of patella tendon injuries were given plasma-rich protein (PRP) injections, and 30% underwent surgery. The mean recovery time following MCL and patella tendon injuries was 44 days and 77 days respectively. 60% of injuries were sustained during training and 40% were suffered in competitive games. 26% were recurring injuries, recurrent meniscus and patella tendon injuries took twice as long to recover compared to the initial injury. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that MCL and patella tendon injuries are the most common knee injuries amongst professional footballers and that meniscus tears and ligament ruptures are relatively rare in comparison. Injuries appear to occur more frequently during training. A high proportion of injuries in the study received injection therapy in the form of PRP or sclerosant. The study suggests recurrent injuries can prolong recovery two-fold

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are among the most common and debilitating knee injuries in professional athletes with an incidence in females up to eight-times higher than their male counterparts. ACL injuries can be career-threatening and are associated with increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis in future life. The increased risk of ACL injury in females has been attributed to various anatomical, developmental, neuromuscular, and hormonal factors. Anatomical and hormonal factors have been identified and investigated as significant contributors including osseous anatomy, ligament laxity, and hamstring muscular recruitment. Postural stability and impact absorption are associated with the stabilizing effort and stress on the ACL during sport activity, increasing the risk of noncontact pivot injury. Female patients have smaller diameter hamstring autografts than males, which may predispose to increased risk of re-rupture following ACL reconstruction and to an increased risk of chondral and meniscal injuries. The addition of an extra-articular tenodesis can reduce the risk of failure; therefore, it should routinely be considered in young elite athletes. Prevention programs target key aspects of training including plyometrics, strengthening, balance, endurance and stability, and neuromuscular training, reducing the risk of ACL injuries in female athletes by up to 90%. Sex disparities in access to training facilities may also play an important role in the risk of ACL injuries between males and females. Similarly, football boots, pitches quality, and football size and weight should be considered and tailored around females’ characteristics. Finally, high levels of personal and sport-related stress have been shown to increase the risk of ACL injury which may be related to alterations in attention and coordination, together with increased muscular tension, and compromise the return to sport after ACL injury. Further investigations are still necessary to better understand and address the risk factors involved in ACL injuries in female athletes. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(2):94–100

Purpose: To determine if early MRI diagnosis in the acutely injured knee affects management, use of resources and patient satisfaction compared to conventional management with physiotherapy. Methods: Patients referred to fracture clinic with acute knee injury in whom a specific clinical diagnosis could not be made were randomised to one of two groups. The MRI group had a scan within 2 weeks and were then reassessed in clinic with management according to the results. The control group received physiotherapy and then reassessed. Patients were assessed in clinic on presentation, at 2 weeks and then by a telephone questionnaire at 3 months. Electronic medical records were also reviewed. Results: 48 patients were recruited in total: 23 in the MRI group (78.2% male, 21.8% female) and 25 in the control group (68% male, 32% female). The mean age was similar in the two groups (29 years (range 18–61) vs. 30 years (18–50)). The MRI group had significantly less physiotherapy appointments (5 ± 3.42 vs. 2.52 ±1.93, p=0.003) on average until definitive treatment but not outpatient appointments (2.72 ± 1.1 vs. 2.43 ±0.66, p=0.27). Median time to surgery was less in the MRI group (138 (31–199) vs.180 days (33–826) vs.) but not statistically significant (p=0.19). A similar number of patients returned to work in both groups (82.6% vs. 76%) but the MRI group had less time off work (15.82 ±22.26 vs. 20.56 ±25.38 days, p=0.48) and statistically better satisfaction scores (2 ±2.68 vs. 3.5 ±2.75, p=0.048) than the control group. Conclusion: We have shown that early MRI in acute knee injury can provide early diagnosis of internal derangement and therefore allow targeted treatment. These patients had significantly less physiotherapy appointments and less time off work which may offset the cost of the MRI. Moreover these patients were significantly more satisfied with the service

Aim: Assessment of a new protocol, were acute soft tissue knee injuries are referred initially to a physiotherapy led knee assessment clinic. Patients and methods: Patients reviewed in the acute knee assessment clinic (KAC) over a 6 month period were included. Patient demographics, specialist referrals, investigations, surgical interventions, and clinical outcomes were analysed. Patients who were managed by the KAC only, were followed up for a minimum of 6 weeks and were asymptomatic at discharge. Patients referred to a specialist were followed up prospectively in order to identify the accuracy of the initial diagnosis made in the KAC. Results: The study included 191 patients (125 males, 66 females) with a mean age of 34.6 years. Patients were seen in the KAC after an average 10.5 days from injury. Initial diagnoses included 35 patelo-femoral pathologies, 30 non-specific soft tissue injuries, 28 collateral ligament injuries, 27 cruciate ligament injuries, 21 combined meniscal and ligamentous injuries, 19 meniscal injuries, 17 patients with knee arthritis, 2 combined cruciate and collateral ligament injuries, 5 patellar dislocations, and 7 non-specific knee effusions. Overall, only 52 patients (27.2%) were referred to a rheumatologist (n=6) or an orthopaedic surgeon (n=46). A total of 25 patients were referred for further investigation (Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) n=14, Arthroscopy n=10, or both n=2). Patients who missed > 2 appointments and had no further episodes were excluded from further analysis (n=20). The initial diagnosis correlated positively with that of the specialist in 26 out of 32 patients (81.3%) who completed a full treatment episode. The diagnosis by the physiotherapist and the specialist correlated with MRI or arthroscopy findings in 85.0% and 95.0% of cases respectively. Conclusion: We believe that our physiotherapy led acute knee assessment clinic is effective and safe as a first referral point for acute knee injuries

Purpose: According to the Ottawa rules, x-rays are not needed after knee trauma unless one or more of the following clinical criteria are present: age over 55 years, pain at palpation of the head of the fibula, pain at palpation of the anterior aspect of the patella, impossible knee flexion beyond 90°, inability to walk four steps immediately after trauma and at the emergency consultation. We conducted a prospective study in a consecutive series of patients to check the validity of this rule in daily practice. Materials and methods: From December 2001 to January 2002, we included all patients consulting in an emergency situation for recent trauma involving only the knee joint. We excluded patients aged less than ten years, wounds without trauma, trauma more than two days before consultation, and patients with a history of trauma involving the same knee. An emergency physical exam was performed in all cases with identification of the study criteria. Standard x-rays (AP and lateral view in the supine position) were obtained for all patients. The patients and the x-rays were seen later by a senior orthopaedic surgeon and a senior radiologist who noted the presence of fracture requiring specific therapeutic management. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values of the Ottawa rule were determined for search for fracture. Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the Ottawa rule were 100%; the specificity was 36%, and the positive predictive value was 25%. Nineteen fractures (14%) requiring specific therapeutic management were identified: all patients had at least one positive sign. Seventy-six patients (55%) without fracture had at least one positive sign. Forty-three patients (31%) without fracture did not have any positive sign. The x-rays were not contributive for these patients. Discussion and conclusion: This study demonstrated the validity of the Ottawa rule in the clinical setting of our practice. With widespread use of this rule, approximately one-third of the x-rays performed for recent trauma involving the knee alone could be avoided

Purpose: To subjectively assess and present the outcome after ACL reconstruction with minimum follow-up of 24 months. Methods: Our knee injury database was established in June 2001. Data were collected prospectively for all knee ligament reconstructions carried out by a single surgeon. The database has a prospectively studied consecutive series where all the patients surveyed completed the Lysholm, KOOS and IKDC 2000 questionnaires preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Our knee injury database comprises of 163 patients who had ACL reconstruction in which Hamstrings were used in 120 cases and Bone Patella-Tendon Bone (BPTB) grafts in 43. This includes 27 complex reconstructions and 12 revisions (11 from other centres). Results: Fifty-six of the 79 patients (70.8%) who were at least 2 years post ACL reconstruction attended for their 2 year review. Majority were male patients(90%) and both attendees and non- attendees were of a similar age (30.5 /30 respectively) and did not exhibit a statistically significant difference in their pre op or early post op scores. In the non-attendee group 2 were students, 1 emigrated, 1 registered as unemployed, 7 no employment status and 3 did not consent to such follow-up. The mechanism of injury was, 62 as sporting injury (24 contact/38 non-contact sport), 3 road traffic accidents and 8 activities of daily living and 2 not recorded. The mean scores were, IKDC – 77.14, Lysholm – 83.96 and KOOS symptom – 81.6. Conclusions: All subjective evaluation questionnaires (KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC) revealed a progressive trend in our patients. We found that in the KOOS, a multidimensional patient completed aggregated score, the Quality of Life (QoL) dimension exhibited results which were interestingly not correlating with the other dimensions of the questionnaire, with patients who scored < 50% occupying manual or non-administrative positions at work

Aims

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are devastating injuries that can result in significant morbidity and time away from sport. There remains considerable variation in strategies employed for investigation, indications for operative intervention, outcome reporting, and rehabilitation following these injuries. At present no study has yet provided a comprehensive overview evaluating the extent, range, and overall summary of the published literature pertaining to MLKI. Our aim is to perform a methodologically rigorous scoping review, mapping the literature evaluating the diagnosis and management of MLKI.

Abstract. Introduction. A lipohaemarthrosis seen on Horizontal beam lateral X-ray in acute knee injury is often considered predictive of an intra-articular fracture requiring further urgent imaging. Methodology. We retrospectively searched a five-year X-ray database for the term “lipohaemarthrosis”. We excluded cases if the report concluded “no lipohaemarthrosis” or “lipohaemarthrosis” AND “fracture”. All remaining cases were reviewed by an Orthopaedic Consultant with a special interest in knee injuries (AD) blinded to the report. X-rays were excluded if a fracture was seen, established osteoarthritic change was present, a pre-existing arthroplasty present or no lipohaemarthrosis present. Remaining cases were then studied for any subsequent Radiological or Orthopaedic surgical procedures. Results. 136 cases were identified and reviewed by an Orthopaedic Consultant. 31 were excluded for no lipohaemarthrosis (n= 11), for degenerative change (n=9), for fracture (n=4), for existing arthroplasty (n=4) and for data errors (n=3). The remaining 105 patients had a mean age of 32, and range 5–90 years. 66 patients underwent further imaging in the form of MRI scan (n=47), CT Scan (n=9) repeat x-rays (n=9) and ultrasound (n=1). 27 fractures were identified. Surgery was performed in 12 cases (11%). Two (2%) urgently (One ACL reconstruction plus meniscus repair, one for ORIF of tibial plateau fracture). Ten (10%) had elective surgery (6 for ACL reconstruction, 2 for ACL reconstruction plus meniscus repair, 2 for loose body removal. Conclusion. The presence of a lipohaemarthrosis on x-ray following acute knee injury was a poor predictor of intra-articular fracture (26%) or need for urgent surgery (2%)

Aims. The lack of disease-modifying treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) is linked to a shortage of suitable biomarkers. This study combines multi-molecule synovial fluid analysis with machine learning to produce an accurate diagnostic biomarker model for end-stage knee OA (esOA). Methods. Synovial fluid (SF) from patients with esOA, non-OA knee injury, and inflammatory knee arthritis were analyzed for 35 potential markers using immunoassays. Partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to derive a biomarker model for cohort classification. The ability of the biomarker model to diagnose esOA was validated by identical wide-spectrum SF analysis of a test cohort of ten patients with esOA. Results. PLS-DA produced a streamlined biomarker model with excellent sensitivity (95%), specificity (98.4%), and reliability (97.4%). The eight-biomarker model produced a fingerprint for esOA comprising type IIA procollagen N-terminal propeptide (PIIANP), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4 (ADAMTS-4), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, interferon-γ-inducible protein-10 (IP-10), and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated excellent discriminatory accuracy: area under the curve (AUC) being 0.970 for esOA, 0.957 for knee injury, and 1 for inflammatory arthritis. All ten validation test patients were classified correctly as esOA (accuracy 100%; reliability 100%) by the biomarker model. Conclusion. SF analysis coupled with machine learning produced a partially validated biomarker model with cohort-specific fingerprints that accurately and reliably discriminated esOA from knee injury and inflammatory arthritis with almost 100% efficacy. The presented findings and approach represent a new biomarker concept and potential diagnostic tool to stage disease in therapy trials and monitor the efficacy of such interventions. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(9):623–632

Introduction. The knee is the most commonly injured joint in sporting accidents, leading to substantial disability, time off work and morbidity (1). Treatment and assessment vary around the UK (2), whilst there remains a limited number of high-quality randomised controlled trials assessing first time, acute soft tissue knee injuries (3,4). As the clinical and financial burden rises (5), vital answers are required to improve prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and delivery of care. In association with the James Lind Alliance, this BASK, BOSTAA and BOA supported prioritising exercise was undertaken over a year. Methods. The James Lind Alliance methodology was followed; a modified nominal group technique was used in the final workshop. An initial survey invited patients and healthcare professionals to submit their uncertainties regarding soft tissue knee injury prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and delivery of care. Seventy-four questions were formulated to encompass common concerns. These were checked against best available evidence. Following the interim survey, 27 questions were taken forward to the final workshop in January 2023, where they were discussed, ranked, and scored in multiple rounds of prioritisation by groups of healthcare professionals, patients, and carers. Results. Over 1000 questions were submitted initially. Twenty-seven were taken forward to the final workshop following the surveys. Nearly half of the responses were from patients/carers. The Top 10 (Figure 1) includes prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation questions, reflecting the concerns of patients, carers, and a wider multidisciplinary team. Conclusion. This validated process has generated an important, wide- ranging Top 10 priorities for future soft tissue knee injury research. These have been submitted to the National Institute for Health and Care Research and are now available for researchers to investigate. The final 27 questions which were taken to the final workshop have also been published on the James Lind Alliance website. Research into these questions will lead to future high-quality research, thus improving patient care & outcomes. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Abstract. Background. Multi-ligament knee injury is a rare but severe injury. Treatment strategies are challenging for most orthopedic surgeons & optimal treatment remains controversial. The purpose of our study was to assess clinico-radiological and functional outcomes after surgical management of multi-ligament knee injuries & to determine factors that could predict outcome of surgery. Materials And Method. It is a prospective observational study of 30 consecutive patients of Multi-ligament knee injury conducted between 2018–2020. All patients were treated surgically with single-stage reconstruction of all injured ligaments and followed standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol. All patients were evaluated for Clinical (VAS score, laxity stress test, muscle-strength, range of motion), Radiological (stress radiographs) & Functional (Lysholm score) outcomes three times-preoperatively, post-operative 3 & 12 months. Results. At final follow up mean VAS score was 0.86±0.77. The anteroposterior & valgus-varus stress test showed ligament laxity >10mm (GradeD) in 93.3% patient which improved to <3mm (normal, GradeA) in 90% patients. Most patients (83.3%) had preoperative-range <100° and muscle strength of MRC Grade-3 which improved to >120° and muscle strength of MRC grade-5 at final followup. Lysholm score was poor (<64) in all patients preoperatively and improved to good (85–94) in 73.3%, excellent (>95) in 20% & fair (65–84) in 6.6% patients. The stress radiographs showed stable results for anterior/posterior & varus/valgus stress. All patients returned to their previous work. Factors that could predict outcomes of surgery are age, timing of surgery, type of surgery & associated injury. Conclusion. Early complete single stage reconstruction can achieve good functional results with overall restoration of sports & working capacity. Positive predictive factors for good outcome are younger age, early surgery & appropriate rehabilitation

Aims. A substantial fraction of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty (KA) or hip arthroplasty (HA) do not achieve an improvement as high as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), i.e. do not achieve a meaningful improvement. Using three patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), our aim was: 1) to assess machine learning (ML), the simple pre-surgery PROM score, and logistic-regression (LR)-derived performance in their prediction of whether patients undergoing HA or KA achieve an improvement as high or higher than a calculated MCID; and 2) to test whether ML is able to outperform LR or pre-surgery PROM scores in predictive performance. Methods. MCIDs were derived using the change difference method in a sample of 1,843 HA and 1,546 KA patients. An artificial neural network, a gradient boosting machine, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, ridge regression, elastic net, random forest, LR, and pre-surgery PROM scores were applied to predict MCID for the following PROMs: EuroQol five-dimension, five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (KOOS-PS). Results. Predictive performance of the best models per outcome ranged from 0.71 for HOOS-PS to 0.84 for EQ-VAS (HA sample). ML statistically significantly outperformed LR and pre-surgery PROM scores in two out of six cases. Conclusion. MCIDs can be predicted with reasonable performance. ML was able to outperform traditional methods, although only in a minority of cases. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(9):512–521

Abstract. Introduction. The knee is the most commonly injured joint in sporting accidents. They cause substantial disability, time off work and long-term problems. There remains a limited number of high-quality randomised controlled trials assessing first time, acute soft tissue knee injuries. Key areas requiring answers include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and delivery of care. In association with the James Lind Alliance, this BASK, BOSTAA and BOA supported prioritising exercise was undertaken over a year. Methodology. The James Lind Alliance methodology was followed. An initial survey invited patients and healthcare professionals to submit their uncertainties regarding soft tissue knee injury prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and delivery of care. Over 1000 questions were submitted. Seventy-four questions were formulated to encompass common concerns. These were checked against best available evidence. Following the interim survey, 27 questions were taken forward to the final workshop in January 2023, where they were discussed, ranked and scored in multiple rounds of prioritisation by groups of healthcare professionals, patients and carers. Results. The Top 10 includes prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation questions, reflecting the concerns of patients, carers and a wider multidisciplinary team. These will be presented and explained. Conclusion. This validated process has generated an important Top 10, which has been submitted to the National Institute for Health and Care Research. All 27 questions will be published, thus being available for researchers to investigate. The questions in the Top 10 will lead to future high quality research, thus improving patient outcomes