Initial treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury remains as controversial in 2023 as it was in the early 19th century, when Sir Astley Cooper and Sir Charles Bell debated the merits or otherwise of surgery to relieve cord compression. There has been a lack of high-class evidence for early surgery, despite which expeditious intervention has become the surgical norm. This evidence deficit has been progressively addressed in the last decade and more modern statistical methods have been used to clarify some of the issues, which is demonstrated by the results of the SCI-POEM trial. However, there has never been a properly conducted trial of surgery versus active conservative care. As a result, it is still not known whether early surgery or active physiological management of the unstable injured spinal cord offers the better chance for recovery. Surgeons who care for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries in the acute setting should be aware of the arguments on all sides of the debate, a summary of which this annotation presents. Cite this article:
Despite advances in treating acute spinal cord injury (SCI), measures to mitigate permanent neurological deficits in affected patients are limited. Augmentation of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) to promote blood flow and oxygen delivery to the injured cord is one of the only currently available treatment options to potentially improve
Lumbar fusion remains the gold standard for the treatment of discogenic back pain. Total disc replacement has fallen out of favor in many institutions. Other motion preservation alternatives, such as nucleus replacement, have had limited success and none are commercially available at this time. Two prospective, nonrandomized multicenter studies of lumbar disc nucleus replacement using the PerQdisc 2.0 nucleus replacement device in patients with lumbar discogenic back pain. Early clinical results are presented. A total of 16 patients from 4 international sites (Germany, Paraguay, Canada and Belgium) were enrolled in the trial between May 2019 and February 2021. Data collection points include baseline and postoperatively at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcome measures were obtained from the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12V2, Analgesic Score (AS), and radiographic assessments. Prospectively gathered data on patient reported
Introduction. Evidence suggests that intra-operative spinal cord monitoring is sensitive and specific for detecting potential neurological injury. However, little is known about surgeons' responses to trace changes and the resultant
National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines on Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression recommend urgent consideration of patients with spinal metastases and imaging evidence of structural spinal failure with spinal instability for surgery to stabilise the spine and prevent Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. We aimed to compare
Objective-Study Design: Recognizing the value of intraoperative SEP monitoring in scoliosis and other spinal surgery, we applied prospectively continuous SEP recording during reconstructive procedures in 82 patients who sustained 20 cervical, 8 thoracic, 6 thoraco-lumbar, and 48 lumbar vertebral fractures or fractures-dislocations to investigate its efficacy in spinal trauma. Material: Seventy-one patients underwent single anterior or posterior operations, and 11 combined anterior-posterior procedures. Forty patients had incomplete injuries, and 42 had no preoperative neurological deficit. SEP trace amplitude at insertion of electrode was considered as the baseline value, and was compared to the lowest intraoperative signal amplitude and the amplitude at completion of operation. Results: Fifty-nine patients had a depression in wave amplitude of more than 25% during surgery; in 25 patients the trace fell by more than 50%, and in 7 cases a more than 75% diminution was recorded. A loss of 50% in SEP signal amplitude showed 67% sensitivity, and 71% specificity in predicting
To assess whether the timing of surgery is an important factor in
The aim of this study was to determine whether early surgical treatment results in better neurological recovery 12 months after injury than late surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Patients with tSCI requiring surgical spinal decompression presenting to 17 centres in Europe were recruited. Depending on the timing of decompression, patients were divided into early (≤ 12 hours after injury) and late (> 12 hours and < 14 days after injury) groups. The American Spinal Injury Association neurological (ASIA) examination was performed at baseline (after injury but before decompression) and at 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS) from baseline to 12 months.Aims
Methods
Introduction. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring allows for assessment of the spinal cord and susceptible structures during complex spinal surgery. It is well validated for the detection of potential neurological injury but little is known of surgeon's responses to an abnormal trace and its effect on
Aim: To determine whether timing of intervention affects
Objective: To study the long term operative and non-operative outcome in patients with diastematomyelia (DM). Design: A prospectively acquired database of all spinal patients seen jointly by the senior authors (JKW, JLF), was searched for patients with DM. Their notes and the database were then reviewed. Subjects: Thirty-six patients were identified; twenty-one (58%) had associated scoliosis. There were 60 associated abnormalities in the 36 patients, most common being ten (27%) with leg length inequality. Twelve patients (33%) had no radiological bony abnormality. Twenty-four (66%) had neurosurgery, eleven (31%) untethering of filum alone and eleven (31%) with removal of a spur and closure of the DM as well. Nineteen (53%) underwent some sort of neuraxial shortening scoliosis correction/surgery. Twenty-eight (78%) were deemed to have a normal/independent
Introduction: Somatosensory evoked potentials are monitored during the surgical treatment of spinal disorders to reduce the risk of cord injury. Whilst studies have examined its role in patients undergoing correction of idiopathic and neuromuscular scoliotic curves, its effectiveness in patients undergoing operative treatment for spinal injury is less certain. Methods and Results: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for spinal trauma. between 1995 and 2000. There were 82 patients with adequate data for analysis who underwent 83 spinal reconstructive procedures. We recorded the age at injury, diagnosis, time of operation, levels instrumented, systolic and diastolic blood pressures and surgical approach. The intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) traces were examined. The SSEP at insertion of electrode was taken as the control level. The highest and lowest intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials and SSEP at closure were noted and expressed as a percentage of the control value. Forty patients (48%) had a pre-operative neurological deficit. Neurological deterioration occurred postoperatively in three patients. Eighty-three traces from 82 patients were available for analysis. Fifty-seven patients had a fall in trace amplitude by more than 25% of the control, 25 by more than 50% and eight by more than 75%. With an SSEP amplitude loss of 60%, both sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of post-operative neurological injury were optimised at 67 and 81% respectively, with one false negative result. SSEP rise at completion of spinal reconstruction and highest intraoperative SSEP rise was compared with
Back ground:. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome after posterior spinal stabilization surgery for the management of de novo non-tuberculous bacterial spinal infection. Method and Result:. Patients presenting to a single tertiary referral spinal centre between August 2011 and June 2014 were included in the study. 21 patients with nontuberculous bacterial infection were identified and included in the study. All patients were managed surgically with posterior stabilisation, with or without neural decompression, without debridement of the infected tissue. Neurological state was assessed using the frankel grading system before and after urgery. Long-term follow-up data was collected using SpineTango COMI questionnaires and Euro Qol EQ-5D system with a mean follow-up duration of 20 months postoperatively. The mean improvement in neurological deficits was 0.92 Frankel grade (range 0–4). At final followup, at a mean of 20 months, mean COMI score was 4.59, average VAS for back pain was 4.28. These symptoms were having no effect or only minor effect on the work or usual activities in 52%. 38% of patients reported a good quality of life. The average EQ-5D value was 0.569. There were no problems with mobility in 44% of patients. In 72% there were no problems with self-care. Conclusion:. Our study has shown that posterior surgery for the management of bacterial, nontuberculous spinal infection can improve
This review provides a concise outline of the advances made in the care of patients and to the quality of life after a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) over the last century. Despite these improvements reversal of the neurological injury is not yet possible. Instead, current treatment is limited to providing symptomatic relief, avoiding secondary insults and preventing additional sequelae. However, with an ever-advancing technology and deeper understanding of the damaged spinal cord, this appears increasingly conceivable. A brief synopsis of the most prominent challenges facing both clinicians and research scientists in developing functional treatments for a progressively complex injury are presented. Moreover, the multiple mechanisms by which damage propagates many months after the original injury requires a multifaceted approach to ameliorate the human spinal cord. We discuss potential methods to protect the spinal cord from damage, and to manipulate the inherent inhibition of the spinal cord to regeneration and repair. Although acute and chronic SCI share common final pathways resulting in cell death and neurological deficits, the underlying putative mechanisms of chronic SCI and the treatments are not covered in this review.
Aim:. Recent guidelines have been published by the Association of Neurophysiological Scientists / British Society for Clinical Neurophysiology (ANS/BSCN) regarding the use of intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) during spinal deformity procedures. We present our unit's experience with IOM and the compliance with national guidelines. Method:. All patients undergoing intra-operative spinal cord monitoring during adult and paediatric spinal deformity surgery between Jan 2009 and Dec 2012 were prospectively followed. The use of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) was recorded and monitoring outcomes were compared to post-operative clinical
The revised Tokuhashi score has been widely used to evaluate indications for surgery and predict survival in patients with metastatic spinal disease. Our objective was to determine whether the score accurately predicted survival in those with MSCC. Retrospective analysis. All patients with MSCC presenting to our unit were included in this study from October 2003 to December 2009. Patients were divided into three groups – Tokuhashi score 0 – 8, 9 – 11 and 12 -15. Neurological outcome and survival. A total of 109 patients with MSCC were managed in our unit during this time. Mean age of patients was 61 years (range 7 - 86). Mean and median survival was 350 (5-2256) and 93 days in the 0-8 group, 439 (8-1902) and 229 days in the 9-11 group, and 922 (6-222) and 875 days in the 12-15 group; p = 0.01. All patients underwent decompression and stabilisation surgery. The rate of consistency between the prognostic score and actual survival was 64% (0-8), 64% (9-11) and 69% (12-15). Overall the consistency was 66%. There was no difference in
Background. There is minimal published data regarding the long-term functional outcome in pyogenic spinal infection. Previous studies have used heterogeneous, unreliable and non-validated measure instruments, or
The optimal management of patients with the diagnosis of a spinal epidural abscess (SEA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with spontaneous SEA and to correlate presentation and treatment with clinical and
Aim: Of Calveston (USA) and Crete (HELLAS). We studied immediate and long-term outcome of 50 patients who underwent subaxial lateral mass fixation of the cervical spine between January 1997 and March 2001. Patients and Methods: Intraopeartive fluoroscopy and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring were employed in all patients. Immediate postoperative CT scans were performed to determine screw trajectory and placement. Follow up ranged from 1 to 5 years. Results: Postoperative CT scans showed that 113 of 210 screws (54%) had unicorticate and 46% had bicorticate purchase. Forty-five screws (31 %) had suboptimal trajectory, but only 7 of these screws minimally penetrated the foramen transversarium without resultant vascular or neurological sequelae. The overall fusion success rate in our series was 90%, while pseudoarthrosis occurred in 5 patients (10%), with screw breakage in 1 patient (2%). Two of these patients had bone graft supplementation and in other 2 patients was done anterior fusion. Conclusions: Results of this study show that the recommended drilling technique and trajectory (15–25 degrees postal to the sagital plane, 20–30 degrees lateral I the axial plane), supplemented bone grafting and intraoperative SEP monitoring are all associated to good screw placement, fusion and
Objective: To assess the correlation between the Denis classification and clinical outcomes. Subjects and Design: We performed a retrospective study of 87 patients with spinal injuries in the thoracolumbar region. All patients were admitted to the Oswestry Spinal injuries unit between Jan 1990 and December 1998. Following a review of their notes, CT scans and radiographs, we attempted to classify their injuries according to the Denis (3 column) Classification of spinal injuries. Outcome Measures: The patients were assessed both at the time of presentation and on subsequent follow up. Neurological function was assessed using the Frankel classification. Results: The results of the study show that the correlation between Denis classification and clinical outcome is poor. In addition, the relative proportions of the two most common Major Injury types described by Denis were reversed in our study with Burst fractures forming the majority of injuries. This difference in out come was attributed primarily to the increased use of CT scanning in our study. It appears that Denis misdiagnosed a significant number of burst (two column) fractures as compression (anterior column) fractures. Conclusions: Our findings showed no correlation between the degree of instability and the number of columns disrupted. We believe that only 3 column fracture dislocations are fundamentally unstable. In addition, our results support the practise of treating vertebral fractures by conservative means with no apparent correlation between treatment modality and