Background

Social context may be important in chronic pain. One focus is reactions to pain between persons with LBP and their partners. Researchers have investigated partner reactions and found influences on pain levels and psychological outcomes, but little is known about factors underpinning these reactions.

There is a desire to reduce the economic burden of low back pain. This in is part because of the 226% increase in invalidity benefits paid out for spinal disorders in the ten years to 1994/5. This paper examines the effect of the change from Invalidity Benefit to Incapacity Benefit in 1995, and considers the utility of these figures as a means of assessing changing patterns of back pain disability. Data were obtained from the DSS on how benefit data were collected and numbers of days of Invalidity/Incapacity Benefits that were paid from 1983/4 to 1998/9. The data suggest that since 1995 that the rate of spinal disability has fallen and has now been stable at 90 million days per year for four years. The headline Incapacity Benefit figures have a very loose relationship with health impact of low back pain. Around 30,000 people per year make the transition to claiming long term Incapacity Benefit from claiming short term Incapacity Benefit. Incapacity Benefit figures are of little utility in assessing changes in low back pain disability. Numbers making the transition to Long Term Incapacity Benefit may be a more useful indicator

Purpose and background. Although low back pain (LBP) with leg pain, is considered by most a poor prognostic indicator, it is at the same time believed to have a favourable natural resolution, and is often treated along similar lines to non-specific LBP, in line with current guidelines. It is unclear whether patients with LBP and leg pain are a distinct subgroup that might benefit from early identification and targeted interventions. We set out to investigate the impact of LBP with leg pain on health outcomes and health resources compared with that of LBP alone, and to explore which factors contribute to the observed disability outcomes. Methods. A systematic literature search of all English language peer reviewed publications was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL for the years 1994 to 2009. Results. Of the 89 papers retrieved, 9 were included in the review. The heterogeneity of data allowed only for narrative analysis of findings. All studies reported worsening baseline health status in terms of poorer self-assessment and increasing use of health care the further the radiation of leg pain. Differences in quality of life measures were higher for physical than for mental health dimensions. Pain and disability outcome at follow up assessment appeared to be less favourable in this group than for individuals with LBP alone. Conclusion. LBP with leg pain is associated with poorer health outcomes and increased use of health resources. These findings argue for early identification of these cases by health care professionals and for pursuing effective treatments rather than simply treating similarly to non-specific LBP

Background and study purpose. Low mood and distress are commonly reported with by people with persistent musculoskeletal pain and may be mislabelled as ‘depression’. In order to understand how pain-related distress is conceptualised and managed in primary care consultations, we explored understanding of pain-related distress and depression from the perspectives of people with persistent musculoskeletal pain and general practitioners (GPs). Method and results. Semi-structured interviews with 21 GPs and 21 people with persistent musculoskeletal pain were conducted. The majority of people with pain had back pain (15/21). Data were analysed thematically using constant comparison techniques. Participants described challenges distinguishing between distress and depression in the context of persistent pain but described strategies to make this distinction. Some people with pain described how acceptance of their situation was key, involving optimism about the future and creation of a new identity. Some GPs expressed ‘therapeutic nihilism’, with uncertainty about the cause of pain and thus how to manage people with both pain and distress, whilst GPs who could identify and build on optimism with patients described how this could help the patient to move forwards. Conclusion. This study offers a model for the primary care consultation with patients presenting with pain-related distress. GPs should recognize the impact of pain on the patient, support the person in acceptance of the pain, explore how the person feels about the future, encourage optimism, and support self-management strategies. Conflicts of Interest: No conflict of interests. Sources of funding: This study was funded by Versus Arthritis – grant number: 22454; Carolyn A Chew-Graham is part-funded by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands

Introduction. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are variably collected before and after total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). We assessed the generalizability of incentivized, prospectively collected PRO data for THA/TKA patient-reported outcome performance measure (PRO-PM) development. Methods. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) received PRO data voluntarily submitted by hospitals in a bundled payment model for THA/TKA procedures. Participating hospitals who collected and successfully submitted these data received an increase in their overall quality score, possibly resulting in a positive impact on model reconciliation payments. PRO data were collected from Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiaries >= 65 years undergoing elective primary THA/TKA procedures from July 1 to August 31, 2016 at hospitals participating in the model. Pre-operative PRO and risk variable data were collected 0 – 90 days prior to surgery, while post-operative PRO data were collected 270 – 365 days following elective THA/TKA. PRO pre-op and post-op data were matched to Medicare claims data for determination of clinically eligible procedures and clinical comorbidities. We compared the characteristics of patients submitting PRO data to other elective primary THA/TKA recipients in the US. Results. Four patient characteristics were associated with HOOS Jr. mean change scores (sex, narcotic use in past 90 days, other joint pain, and back pain) and four with KOOS Jr. mean change scores (sex, Hispanic ethnicity, other joint pain, and back pain). The frequency of simultaneous bilateral procedures, dementia, trauma, and dialysis were statistically significantly lower in patients submitting PRO data compared to other US Medicare beneficiaries undergoing elective primary THA/TKA, but no difference was greater than 1.5% absolute percentage points between groups. Conclusions. Offering financial incentives in alternative payment models to encourage PRO data collection and submission can produce generalizable data for PRO measure development. The possibility of non-respondent biases will need to be specifically considered in measure development

Introduction. Studies have addressed the issue of increasing prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) pain among different occupations. However, contributing factors to MSK pain have not been fully investigated among orthopaedic surgeons. Thus, this study aimed to approximate the prevalence and predictors of MSK pain among Saudi orthopaedic surgeons working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods. A cross-sectional study using an electronic survey was conducted in Riyadh. The questionnaire was distributed through email among orthopaedic surgeons in Riyadh hospitals. Standardized Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms were used. Descriptive measures for categorical and numerical variables were presented. Student’s t-test and Pearson’s χ2 test were used. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results. The response rate was 80.3%, with a total number of 179 of Saudi orthopaedic surgeons (173 males and six females). Of our sample, 67.0% of the respondents complained of having MSK pain. The most commonly reported MSK pain was lower back (74.0%), followed by neck (58.2%). Age and body mass index were implicated in the development of more than one type of MSK pain. Increased years of experience (≥ 6 years) was linked to shoulder/elbow, lower back, and hip/thigh pain. Smoking is widely associated with lower back pain development, whereas physicians who do not smoke and exercise regularly reported fewer pain incidences. Excessive bending and twisting during daily practice have been correlated with increased neck pain. Conclusion. MSK pain was found to be common among Saudi orthopaedic surgeons. Further extensive research should be conducted to understand and analyze the risk factors involved and search for possible improvements to avoid further complications. However, ergonomics education during surgical training could be effective at modifying behaviors and reducing MSK pain manifestations

Aims. We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences. Methods. The Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study was a multicentre randomized controlled trial with recruitment from September 2006 to February 2012. A total of 247 patients with one- or two-level central lumbar spinal stenosis, stratified by the presence of DS, were randomized to decompression alone or decompression with fusion. The five-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), visual analogue scales for back and leg pain, and patient-reported satisfaction, decreased pain, and increased walking distance. The reoperation rate was recorded. Results. Five-year follow-up was completed by 213 (95%) of the eligible patients (mean age 67 years; 155 female (67%)). After five years, ODI was similar irrespective of treatment, with a mean of 25 (SD 18) for decompression alone and 28 (SD 22) for decompression with fusion (p = 0.226). Mean EQ-5D was higher for decompression alone than for fusion (0.69 (SD 0.28) vs 0.59 (SD 0.34); p = 0.027). In the no-DS subset, fewer patients reported decreased leg pain after fusion (58%) than with decompression alone (80%) (relative risk (RR) 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.97). The frequency of subsequent spinal surgery was 24% for decompression with fusion and 22% for decompression alone (RR 1.1 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.8)). Conclusion. Adding fusion to decompression in spinal stenosis surgery, with or without spondylolisthesis, does not improve the five-year ODI, which is consistent with our two-year report. Three secondary outcomes that did not differ at two years favoured decompression alone at five years. Our results support decompression alone as the preferred method for operating on spinal stenosis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(7):705–712

Numerous studies have demonstrated that concomitant lower back pain (LBP) results in worse functional outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for the management of end stage hip and knee arthritis. However, no equivalent studies have analysed the impact of back pain on the outcomes of patients with end stage ankle arthritis. Furthermore, given that two widely accepted surgical options exist in the treatment of ankle arthritis, namely total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and ankle arthrodesis (AA), it is possible that one surgical technique may be superior in patients with LBP. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of LBP in people with ankle arthritis, analyse its effect on functional outcomes, and explore whether there was a treatment advantage from either TAA or AA. Prospectively collected data from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) database of ankle arthritis was analysed in this study. All patients with ankle arthritis who underwent surgery performed by three fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at a single institution between January 2003 and July 2012 were studied. Patient demographics were collected pre-operatively, including the absence or presence of back pain, and post-operative follow up was performed at 2 and 5 years, evaluating patient-reported functional outcome measures including the Ankle Arthritis Score (AAS) and the 36-item short form survey (SF-36). Using a linear regression model, a multivariate analysis was performed to examine the relationship between back pain, TAAs and AAs. In total, 451 patients were studied. 164 patients (36.4%) presented with concomitant LBP. At presentation, the LBP group had worse AAS scores (54.8 vs 57.8 p. At 2 years postoperatively, the AAS score was the same in both groups (28.9 vs 26.8 p = 0.3), but patients with LBP had worse SF-36 PCS (42.1 vs 36.6 p 0.05) in any of the functional outcome scores at 2 or 5 years post-operatively. The results of this study suggest there is no advantage of TAA over AA in the treatment of ankle arthritis in patients with concomitant lower back pain. Although pre-operative back pain resulted in worse SF-36 outcomes at 2 and 5 years post- operatively, this was not the case for AAS scores

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently one of the most common elective surgical procedures in the United States. The increase in the proportion of younger patients in receipt of surgery, in concert with a dramatic rise in the incidence of obesity, has contributed to the on-going, exponential increase in the number of arthroplasties performed annually. Despite materials advances for implants, the U.S. revision burden has remained static for the last decade. According to the 2013 CMS MEDPAR file the typical CMS reimbursement falls far short of costs incurred by the hospital, resulting in an average net loss of revenue of $9,539; and over 90% of hospitals lose money for every revision case performed. Today, approximately 5% of all primaries performed will result in an early revision (< 3 years). In order to understand ways with which to mitigate the incidence of early revision due to mechanical complications, a multicentric group of sensor-assisted patients was follow-up out to 3 years. In this study, 278 sensor-assisted patients were followed out to 3 years. The intraoperative devices used in this study contain microsensors and a processing unit. Kinetic and center of load location data are projected, in real-time, to a screen. Because of the wireless nature of the intraoperative sensors, the patella can be reduced, and kinematic data can be evaluated through the range of motion. For each patient, the soft-tissue envelope was balanced to within a mediolateral differential of 15 lbf., through the ROM, as per the suggestion of previously reported literature. The average patient profile indicates: age = 69.7 years, BMI = 30.4, gender distribution = 36% male/64% female. Any adverse event within the 3-year follow-up interval was captured. By 3 years, 1 patient in this population has required revision surgeon due to mechanical complicatons. Overall adverse events included: pain in hip (3), pain in contralateral knee (2), wound drainage (3), DVT (1), death (1), stiffness in operative knee (2), infection (3), global pain (2), back pain (2). Based on the average reported number of early revisions that occur in the U.S. (5% of primaries), it was anticipated for this patient group to require approximately 13 revisions by the 3-year follow-up interval. Using 2013 CMS MEDPAR data, these 13 revisions would have resulted in $124,007 cost-to-hospital. However, only 1 revision (0.4%) was observered, therefore $114,468 in additional costs were spared for the aggregate of participating hospitals. This data suggests that the incorporation of kinetic sensors in TKA may assist the surgeon in achieving soft-tissue balance and thereby avoiding adverse mechanical complications that require surgical intervention

Background. Various studies have highlighted issues regarding the prevalence of back pain due to lead apron use. The health and safety executive guidelines on personal protection equipment state that an employee should be able to carry the weight of a lead apron without injury (HSE, 2017). It has been suggested that wearing a 15 pound lead apron can place pressures of up to 300 pounds per square inch of the intervertebral discs (Khalil, 1993), ‘interventionalist's disc disease’ has been identified as a confirmed entity (Ross et al. 1997). Aim. To evaluate the prevalence of back pain amongst theatre staff and correlate this to lead apron use. Methods. Data collection (November 2018 – February 2019) involved the distribution of questionnaires to staff using lead aprons on a routine basis at Salisbury District Hospital. Results. A total of 59 members of staff responded to the questionnaire. The results showed that 30% staff had a previous history of back pain, of these 61% felt that their back pain had worsened since wearing lead aprons. 46% of staff who did not have any previous history of back pain developed new back pain since wearing lead aprons. A total of 46% of staff feel that their back pain has been exacerbated or caused by lead apron wearing. Conclusion. The study highlights that a significant proportion of staff had new or worsening back pain due to lead apron use. This can lead to time off work and could lead to unsafe practice around ionising radiation. No Conflicts of interest No funding obtained

Aim. To determine if the location and pattern of knee pain as described by the patients using the knee pain map was comparable with the intra articular pathology found on arthroscopy as well as to facilitate diagnosis based on pain. Methods. There were fifty five consecutive patients with acute and chronic knee pain participating in the study and they subsequently underwent arthroscopy of the knee joint as therapeutic or diagnostic procedure in day surgery. Those patients with extra articular pathologies, referred pain hip, back and foot were excluded from the study. All the participants were consented for the study; subjective data was recorded on the standardised knee pain map that included visual analogue pain scale preoperatively on the day of admission for arthroscopy. The findings of the arthroscopy including EUA were recorded on the on standard arthroscopy forms used in our department by the operating surgeon. Results. Patients on the knee pain map most often recorded sharp/stabbing pain (72%), followed by diffuse dull pain (14.5%), mixed dull and sharp pain (10 %) and burning pain (3.5%). 82% of the localising pain pattern recorded on the knee pain map by the patients corresponded to the intra articular lesion found during knee arthroscopy. 18 % of the pain mapping location and pattern was not very specific to the intrarticular arthroscopic lesions. Conclusions. The results from our study indicate, majority of the patients could map the knee pain location and pattern correlating to the knee arthroscopic findings. Furthermore, the knee pain mapping can be used as a reliable tool to assist the clinician to determine the specific knee pain patterns correlating with intra-articular lesion

Objectives. The main objective of our study was to determine the treatment effect of corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain. We also examined whether there was any effect on the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks and/or surgery. Subjects and Method. In a randomised, double blind controlled trial, 150 eligible patients with radicular pain and unilateral symptoms who failed conservative management were randomised for a single injection with bupivacaine and methylprednisolone (b+s) or bupivacaine (b) alone. The outcome measures used included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for leg pain and back pain and patient's subjective level of satisfaction of the outcome. Results. We recruited 76 patients in the b only group and 74 patients in the b+s group. There was no statistically significant difference in the outcome measures between the groups at 3 months (change in ODI [p=0.2], change in VAS [back pain, p=0.28; leg pain, p=0.67]. Subgroup analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the change in scores between the stenotic group and disc herniation group at 3 months. At 1 year follow-up data was available for 86% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of further interventions in either group. Conclusion. Clinical improvement occurs in both groups of patients. Corticosteroids did not provide additional benefit. There is no difference in the need for further root blocks or surgery

Introduction. Various rehabilitation shoes are prescribed to protect the forefoot following surgery. Patients often complain of discomfort in other areas as a result of the postoperative shoe, including the knee, hip and lower back. This has never been quantified. This study aims to establish the effect on other joints using gait analysis. Methods: 11 healthy volunteers were investigated using various common types of postoperative shoe. They were studied with gait analysis equipment and the joint motion assessed with commercial software. The effect of commercial devices designed to minimise gait changes by lifting the contralateral foot were also evaluated. Results. There was a reduction in knee flexion and extension compared to the contralateral leg in all phases of the gait cycle. This was the case with both heel wedge shoes and inflatable air boots. There was also an increase in pelvic tilt during gait with both shoes, which was more pronounced with the air boot. The foot raise device for the contralateral foot which is designed to decrease these changes was effective in decreasing gait changes. Discussion. The use of rehabilitation shoes after forefoot surgery is almost universal. Patients are rarely counselled of the risk of joint pain or back pain as a result of the postoperative shoe. Patients with pre-existing back pain or hip pain may have fewer symptoms if they are supplied with an equalising device to raise the other foot. Conclusions. Patients are at risk of initiation or exacerbation of low back pain or lower limb joint pain from the use of postoperative shoes. Patients with a history of back or limb symptoms should be provided with an equalising device for the contralateral limb to minimise their discomfort. Patients should be warned of this risk when giving consent

Objective of the study. To determine if the location and pattern of knee pain as described by the patients using the knee pain map was comparable with the intra articular pathology found on arthroscopy as well as to facilitate diagnosis based on pain. Methods. There were Sixty consecutive patients with acute and chronic knee pain participating in the study and they subsequently underwent arthroscopy of the knee joint as therapeutic or diagnostic procedure in day surgery. Those patients with extra articular pathologies, referred pain hip, back and foot were excluded from the study. All the participants were consented for the study; subjective data was recorded on the standardised knee pain map that included visual analogue pain scale preoperatively on the day of admission for arthroscopy. The findings of the arthroscopy including EUA were recorded on the on standard arthroscopy forms used in our department by the operating surgeon. Results. Patients on the knee pain map most often recorded sharp/stabbing pain (72%), followed by diffuse dull pain (14.5%), mixed dull and sharp pain (10 %) and burning pain (3.5%). 78 % of the localising pain pattern recorded on the knee pain map by the patients corresponded to the intra articular lesion found during knee arthroscopy. 18 % of the pain mapping location and pattern were not very specific to the intrarticular arthroscopic lesions and the rest were non specific. Conclusions. The majority of the patients could map the knee pain location and pattern correlating to the knee arthroscopic findings. The results from our study indicate that knee pain mapping can be used as a reliable tool to assist the clinician to determine the specific knee pain patterns correlating with discrete pathologic findings knee intra articular lesion

Introduction: Current evidence on the indications for and efficacy of non-rigid lumbar stabilisation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review the results of this system in thirty four patients who underwent this procedure between 2002 and 2006. Methods & Results: Validated outcome measures including Visual Analog Score (VAS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Modified Zung Score and Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 year post operatively. Subjective patient outcome (much better, better, same, worse) was assessed at final followup Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis was performed using need for revision surgery as endpoint. The indications for surgery in thirty patients was radicular pain and back pain, these patients underwent discectomy (12 patients) or decompression (18 patients) in addition to Dynesys. Two patients who had only back pain underwent Dynesys alone. There were statistically significant improvements in VAS, RMDQ, Modified Zung and MSPQ scores at 1 year. However at final followup 46% of patients had a unsatisfactory subjective patient outcome (worse or the same). 25% of patients required revision surgery (posterolateral fusion) for ongoing pain (seven patients) or infection (one patient). Conclusion: We recommend that all patients undergoing this procedure are counselled regarding the high rate of revision surgery and patient dissatisfaction. Routine use of this implant should be subject to the findings of larger studies and randomised controlled trials

Introduction: Current evidence on the indications for and efficacy of non-rigid lumbar stabilisation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review the results of this system in thirty four patients who underwent this procedure between 2002 and 2006. Methods & Results: Validated outcome measures including Visual Analog Score (VAS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Modified Zung Score and Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 year post operatively. Subjective patient outcome (much better, better, same, worse) was assessed at final followup Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis was performed using need for revision surgery as endpoint. The indications for surgery in thirty patients was radicular pain and back pain, these patients underwent discectomy (12 patients) or decompression (18 patients) in addition to Dynesys. Two patients who had only back pain underwent Dynesys alone. There were statistically significant improvements in VAS, RMDQ, Modified Zung and MSPQ scores at 1 year. However at final followup 46% of patients had a unsatisfactory subjective patient outcome (worse or the same). 25% of patients required revision surgery (posterolateral fusion) for ongoing pain (seven patients) or infection (one patient). Conclusion: We recommend that all patients undergoing this procedure are counselled regarding the high rate of revision surgery and patient dissatisfaction. Routine use of this implant should be subject to the findings of larger studies and randomised controlled trials. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Introduction. We report the outcomes of minimally invasive technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure using Hollow Modular Anchorage (HMA) screws supplemented by routine pedicle screw fixation (Dynesis). Patients and Methods. Seventy-nine patients, who had undergone PLIF procedure using HMA screws supplemented by pedicle screw fixation, were included. Patients deemed suitable for surgery following discography under sedation, with Marcaine instillation establishing reducibility of the listhesis and temporary relief of symptoms. Clinical outcome included visual analogue scale scores for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Results. Average age was 59 (range: 27-85). Mean follow- up was 5 years (range: 1-10). All cases went into union. None were lost to follow-up. Average length of stay was 24 hours (18-72 hours). All clinical parameters improved except SF-36. Mean ODI improved from 54 (range: 44-89) preoperatively to 33 (17-55) postoperatively (statistically significant, p=0.004). Back pain relief improved in visual analogue scale from average of 68 (range: 60-100) preoperatively to 37 postoperatively (range: 8:46) (statistically significant, p= 0.022). Leg pain relief improved from 53 (range: 31-100) preoperatively to 28 postoperatively (range: 4:60) (statistically significant, p= 0.007). Although mean SF-36 score improved from 37 (range: 10-41) preoperatively to 47 (range: 53-94) postoperatively (statistically insignificant, p=0.592). Complications included: one infection required removal of implant; two temporary motor weaknesses related to L5 nerve root; four required removal of the pedicle screw due to pain or loosening. Discussion. Our results are encouraging. Interbody HMA screws are porous hollow titanium screws with favourable biomechanical characteristics. Rather than square cages, they permit accurate placement of implant. Dynesys offers the option of extension and flexible support for the adjacent segment. Conclusion. PLIF supplemented with pedicle fixation is a reliable and safe procedure for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SF-36 is less sensitive for assessing spinal surgery outcome

Purpose. To determine, for the first time, how back pain is portrayed in the United Kingdom press. Methods and Results. LexisNexisTM Professional search engine was utilised to retrieve articles from all national newspapers over a six months containing the terms “back pain/backpain/back ache/backache” from May to October 2009. 284 relevant articles were retrieved. Of these tabloids accounted for 62% and broadsheets for 38%. Back pain was the sole topic in 7%, a main topic in 18% and mentioned in passing in 75%. 15% were essentially case reports and the tone was neutral in 95%, positive in 2.5% and negative in 2.5%. The cause of back pain was mentioned in 11% of articles- trauma accounted for 50% and disc disease and spinal deformity for 20% each. Only 0.3% of articles discussed litigation. Articles mentioned new physiotherapy regimes in 7%, new forms of alternative therapy in 7%, new surgical techniques/technologies in 2% and new medications in 1%. They were significantly more likely to mention new non-surgical techniques- Fishers' Exact Test p=0.01. Articles were alternative therapy related in 3%, physiotherapist related in 2%, surgeon related in 1% and pain specialist related in 1%. 10% of papers included a quote from an “expert” of which 23% were Spine Surgeons, 16% GP's, 13% Sports Physicians, 13% alternative therapists, 10% pain specialists and 7% physiotherapists. Overall, 98% of articles were of a neutral tone and 1% were of a positive tone or negative tone. Articles concerning physiotherapists or new surgical techniques/technologies were significantly more likely to be of a positive overall tone than the other articles- Fishers' Exact Test p=0.04. Conclusions. Back pain receives a considerable amount of attention in the United Kingdom press. Much of this currently concentrates on isolated case reports, the aetiology of back pain is poorly represented, quoted “experts” are frequently non-medical and new surgical treatments receive significantly less attention than new non-surgical treatments. The press play an important role in educating and informing the general public. The stories they cover ad how they cover them have a powerful influence on public perceptions. We need to do more to engage with the press and positively influence their reportage

Objectives: To determine the treatment effect of corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain. Secondary investigations were on the requirement for subsequent interventions such as root blocks and/or surgery. A sub group analysis between sciatica and stenosis was undertaken. Study Design: A randomised, double blind controlled trial. Subjects: 150 eligible patients with radicular pain and unilateral chronic symptoms were randomised for a single injection with bupivacaine and methylprednisolone (b+s) or bupivacaine (b) alone. Outcome measures: The outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for leg pain and back pain and patient’s subjective level of satisfaction of the outcome. Results: 76 patients in the b only group and 74 patients in the b+s group. Clinically useful improvements of greater than 10 points on the ODI occurred in 54%, deterioration of 10 points or more occurred in 17%. Visual analogue for leg improved by 2 or more in 63%. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups at 3 months (change in ODI [p=0.2], change in VAS [back pain, p=0.28; leg pain, p=0.67]. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the change in scores between the stenotic group and disc herniation group at 3 months. At 1 year follow-up data was available for 86% of the patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of further interventions. Conclusion: Clinical improvement occurs in both groups of patients. Corticosteroids did not provide additional benefit. There is no difference in the need for further root blocks or surgery

Bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis may induce instability which compromises outcome. In an attempt to overcome this problem, bilateral decompression can be carried out through a unilateral approach. The ipsilateral side is decompressed by hemi-laminectomy with undercutting partial facetectomy and the contra-lateral side is treated by careful excavation beneath the spinous processes and laminae with preservation of the laminae, posterior ligament complexes and paraspinal muscles. This is achieved with the aid of an operating microscope or loupe and headlight. Previous reports contain little information about outcome and complications. We reviewed 30 patients with bilateral spinal stenosis, but without significant spondylolisthesis who were decompressed bilaterally from a unilateral approach by a single surgeon during a calendar year. They represented a third of our annual operations for spinal stenosis. Thirty patients had 45 levels decompressed. Female to male ratio was 2:1 and average age was 66 years. The average duration of preoperative symptoms was 1.6 years. The mean follow up period was 30 weeks (12 weeks to one year). Assessment was carried out using the Oswestry Disability Index, pre- and post-operative visual analogue pain scores for leg pain and back pain, walking distance and MacNab criteria of patient outcome. Results: improvement in Oswestry Disability Index, pain scores for sciatica and back pain and improved walking distance. All but one case had good or excellent outcome. Complications: one dural tear and two cases with temporary dermatomal sensory change. Whilst the technique is safe, and effective, a longer randomised controlled study is needed to demonstrate any real advantage over traditional approaches