Dual-mobility (DM) bearings are effective to mitigate dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, data on its use for treating dislocation is scarce. Aim of this study was to compare DM bearings, standard bearings and constrained liner (CL) in revision THA for recurrent dislocation and to identify risk factors for re-dislocation. We reviewed 100 consecutive revision THAs performed for dislocation from 2012 and 2019. 45 hips (45%) received a DM construct, while 44 hips (44%) and 11 hips (11%) had a standard bearing and CL, respectively. Rates of re-dislocation, re-revision for dislocation and overall re-revision were compared. Radiographs were assessed for cup positioning, restoration of centre of rotation, leg length and offset. Risk factors for re-dislocation were determined by cox regression analysis. Modified Harris hip scores (mHHS) were calculated. Mean follow-up was 53 months (1 to 103). DM constructs were used more frequently in elderly patients (p=0.011) and hips with abductor deficiency (p< 0.001). The re-dislocation rate was 11.1% for DM bearings compared with 15.9% for standard bearings and 18.2% for CL (p=0.732). Revision-free survival for DM constructs was 83% (95% CI 0.77 – 0.90) compared to 75% (95% CI 0.68 – 0.82) for standard articulations and 71% (95% CI 0.56 – 0.85) for CL (p=0.455). Younger age (HR 0.91; p=0.020), lower comorbidity (HR 0.42; p=0.031), smaller heads (HR 0.80; p=0.041) and cup retention (HR 8.23; p=0.022) were associated with re-dislocation. Radiological analysis did not reveal a relationship between restoration of hip geometry and re-dislocation. mHHS significantly improved from 43.8 points to 65.7 points (p<0.001) with no differences among bearing types. Our findings suggest that DM bearings do not sufficiently prevent dislocation in revision THA for recurrent dislocation. Reconstruction of the abductor complex may play a key role to reduce the burden in these high-risk patients

MPFL reconstruction has demonstrated a very high success rate with improved patella stability, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes. However technical error and a lack of consideration of anatomic risk factors have been shown to contribute to failure after MPFL reconstruction. Previous research has also reported a complication rate of 26% following surgery. The purposes of this study were to determine the re-dislocation rate, type and number of complications, and most common additional surgical procedures following MPFL reconstruction. Patients with symptomatic recurrent patellofemoral instability underwent an MPFL reconstruction (n = 268) and were assessed with a mean follow-up of 31.5 months (minimally 24-months). Concomitant procedures were performed in addition to the MPFL reconstruction in order to address significant anatomic or biomechanical characteristics. Failure of the patellofemoral stabilization procedure was defined as post-operative re-dislocation of the patella. Rates of complications and re-procedures were assessed for all patients. The re-dislocation rate following MPFL reconstruction was 5.6% (15/268). There were no patella fractures. A total of 49/268 patients (18.3%) returned to the operating room for additional procedures following surgery. The most common reason for additonal surgery was removal of symptomatic tibial tubercle osteotomy hardware in 24/268 patients (8.9%). A further 9.3% of patients underwent addtional surgery including revision MPFL reconstruction: with trochleoplasty 8/268 (3.0%), with tibial tubercule osteotomy 4/286 (1.5%) and with femoral derotation osteotomy 3/268 (1.1%); manipulation under anaesthesia for reduced knee range of motion 4/268 (1.5%); knee arthroscopy for pain 8/268 (3.0%); and cartilage restoration procedures 3/268 (1.1%). There was 1 case of wound debridement for surgical incision infection. MPFL reconstruction using an a la carte approach to surgical selection demonstrated a post-operative redislocation rate of 5.6%. The rate of complications following surgical stabilization was low, with the most common reason for additional surgery being removal of hardware

Dual mobility (DM) components are increasingly used to prevent and treat dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Intraprosthetic dissociation (IPD) is a known rare complication of these implants and has reportedly decreased with modern implants. The purpose of this paper is to report the diagnosis and treatment of modern DM IPD. 1453 DM components were implanted between 2010 and 2021. 695 in primary and 758 in revision THA. 49 hips sustained a dislocation of the large head and 5 sustained an IPD at presentation. 6 additional IPD occurred at the time of reduction of large head. The average age was 64, 54% were female and the mean follow-up was three years. Of the 11 IPD, 8 had a history of instability, 5 had abductor insufficiency, 4 had prior lumbar fusion, and 3 were conversions from fracture. The overall IPD incidence was 0.76%. Ten of the 11 DM IPD were missed at initial presentation or at the time of reduction, and all were discharged with presumed reduction. The mean time from IPD to surgical treatment was 3 weeks. One patient died with an IPD at 5 months. A DM head was reimplanted in six, two underwent revision of the acetabular component with exchange of DM head, and four were revised to a constrained liner. The re-revision rate was 55% at a mean 1.8 years. None of the patients who underwent cup revision required subsequent re-revision while half of the constrained liners and exchange of DM heads required re-revision. The overall rate of DM dislocation or IPD is low. It is critical to identify an IPD on radiographs as it was almost universally missed at presentation or when it occurred iatrogenically. For patients presenting with IPD, the surgeon should consider acetabular revision and conversion to a constrained liner or a larger DM, with special attention to removing impinging structures that could increase the risk of re-dislocation

Instability is a common indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, even after the initial revision, some patients continue to have recurrent dislocations. This study investigates those at risk for recurrent dislocation after revision THA for instability at a single institution. Between 2009 and 2019, 163 patients underwent revision THA for instability at a single institution. Thirty-three of these patients required re-revision THA due to recurrent dislocation. Cox proportional hazard models with death as a competing event were used to analyze risk factors, including prosthesis sizing and alignment. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to assess patient outcomes (Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) physical score, VR-12 mental score, Harris Hip Score, and hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement). Duration of follow-up until either re-revision or final follow-up was a mean of 45.3 ± 38.2 months. The 1-year cumulative incidence for recurrent dislocation after revision was 8.7%, which increased to 19.6% at 5 years and 32.9% at 10 years postoperatively. In the multivariable analysis, high ASA score [HR 2.71], being underweight (BMI<18 kg/m. 2. ) [HR 36.26] or overweight/obese (BMI>25 kg/m. 2. ) [HR 4.31], use of specialized liners [HR 5.51–10.71], lumbopelvic stiffness [HR 6.29], and postoperative abductor weakness [HR 7.20] were significant risk factors for recurrent dislocation. Increasing the cup size decreased the dislocation risk [HR 0.89]. The dual mobility construct did not affect the risk for recurrent dislocation in univariate or multivariable analyses. VR-12 physical and HHS (pain and function) scores improved postoperatively at midterm. Patients requiring revision THA for instability are at risk for recurrent dislocation. Higher ASA scores, abnormal BMI, use of special liners, lumbopelvic stiffness, and postoperative abductor weakness are significant risk factors for re-dislocation

Dislocation post THA confers a higher risk of re-dislocation (Kotwal et al, 2009). The dual mobility (DM) cup design (1974) was aimed at improving the stability by increasing the femoral head to neck ratio (Cuthbert et al., 2019) combining the ideas of low friction arthroplasty with increased jump distance associated with a big head arthroplasty. Understand the dislocation rates, rates of aseptic loosening, infection rate and revision rates between the 2 types of constructs to provide current and up-to date evidence. Medline, pubmed, embase and Cochrane databases were used based on PRISMA guidelines. RevMan software was used for the meta-analysis. Studies (English literature) which used DM construct with atleast 6 months follow-up used as intervention and non DM construct as control were included. 2 independent reviewers conducted the review with a third reviewer in case of difference in opinion regarding eligibility. Primary outcome was dislocation rate and secondary outcome was rate of revision. 564 articles identified out of which 44 articles were screened for full texts and eventually 4 systematic review articles found eligible for the study. Thus, study became a review of systematic reviews. From the 4 systematic reviews, another 35 studies were identified for data extraction and 13 papers were used for meta-analysis. Systematic reviews evaluated, projected an average follow up of 6-8 years with significantly lower dislocation rates for DM cups. The total number of patients undergoing DM cup primary THA were 30,559 with an average age 71 years while the control group consisted of 218,834 patients with an average age of 69 years. DM group had lower rate of dislocation (p < 0.00001), total lower rate of cup revision (p < 0.00001, higher incidence of fracture (p>0.05). DM THA is a viable alternative for conventional THA. The long-term results of DM cups in primary THA need to be further evaluated using high quality prospective studies and RCTs

Abstract. Introduction. Dislocation post THA confers a higher risk of re-dislocation (Kotwal et al, 2009). The dual mobility (DM) cup design (1974) was aimed at improving the stability by increasing the femoral head to neck ratio (Cuthbert et al., 2019) combining the ideas of low friction arthroplasty with increased jump distance associated with a big head arthroplasty. Aims. Understand the dislocation rates, rates of aseptic loosening, infection rate and revision rates between the 2 types of constructs to provide current and up-to date evidence. Methods. Medline, pubmed, embase and Cochrane databases were used based on PRISMA guidelines. RevMan software was used for the meta-analysis. Studies (English literature) which used DM construct with atleast 6 months follow-up used as intervention and non DM construct as control were included. 2 independent reviewers conducted the review with a third reviewer in case of difference in opinion regarding eligibility. Primary outcome was dislocation rate and secondary outcome was rate of revision. Results. 564 articles identified out of which 44 articles were screened for full texts and eventually 4 systematic review articles found eligible for the study. Thus, study became a review of systematic reviews. From the 4 systematic reviews, another 35 studies were identified for data extraction and 13 papers were used for meta-analysis. Systematic reviews evaluated, projected an average follow up of 6–8 years with significantly lower dislocation rates for DM cups. The total number of patients undergoing DM cup primary THA were 30,559 with an average age 71 years while the control group consisted of 218,834 patients with an average age of 69 years. DM group had lower rate of dislocation (p < 0.00001), total lower rate of cup revision (p < 0.00001, higher incidence of fracture (p>0.05). Conclusion. DM THA is a viable alternative for conventional THA. The long-term results of DM cups in primary THA need to be further evaluated using high quality prospective studies and RCTs. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Previously, we conducted a multi-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without remplissage. The end point for the randomized controlled trial was two years post-operative, providing support for the benefits of remplissage in the short term in reducing recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to compare the medium term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of patients previously randomized to have undergone isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) for the management of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. The rate of recurrent instability and instances of re-operation were examined. The original study was a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial with two 1:1 parallel groups with recruitment undertaken between 2011 and 2017. For this medium-term study, participants were reached for a telephone follow-up in 2020 and asked a series of standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation or reoperation that had occurred on their shoulder for which they were randomized. Descriptive statistics were generated for all variables. “Failure” was defined as occurrence of a dislocation. “Recurrent instability” was defined as the participant reporting a dislocation or two or more occurences of subluxation greater than one year post-operative. All analyses were undertaken based on intention-to-treat whereby their data was analyzed based on the group to which they were originally allocated. One-hundred and eight participants were randomized of which 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to final follow-up was 49.3 for the NO REMP group and 53.8 for the REMP group. The rates of re-dislocation or failure were 8% (4/52) in the REMP group at an average of 23.8 months post-operative versus 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP at an average of 16.5 months post-operative. The rates of recurrent instability were 10% (5/52) in the REMP group at an average of 24 months post-operative versus 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group at an average of 19.5 months post-operative. Survival curves were significantly different favouring REMP in both scenarios. Arthroscopic Bankart repair combined with remplissage is an effective procedure in the treatment of patients with an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and minimal glenoid bone loss (<15%). Patients can expect favourable rates of recurrent instability when compared with isolated Bankart repair at medium term follw-up

This retrospective study was to investigate radiographic and clinical outcomes in treatment of hip instability in children and young adults undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with or without femoral osteotomy. 19 patients (21 hips) with CP were treated with PAO with or without femoral osteotomy The mean age was 16.2 years old (7 to 28 years). Five patients (5 hips) received PAO, Six patients (7 hips) PAO with femoral derotation osteotomy, Eight patients (9 hips) PAO with varus derotational osteotomy (VDRO). Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and CT were taken to assess the migration percentage (MP), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), Sharp angle, femoral neck anteversion, neck-shaft angle. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was assessed pre- and post-surgery. Complications were recorded. The mean follow-up time was 41.2 months (range, 24 to 86 months). All hips but one were pain free at final visit. The GMFCS improved by one level in 10 of 19 patients. MP improved from a mean of 76.6% to 18.6% at the final follow-up(p<0.001). The mean pre-operative LCEA and Sharp angle were −33.5 ? and 35 ? respectively, improved to 21.5 ? and 11.8 ? at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). There were six patients (7 hips) had re-subluxation at latest follow-up. Nervus cutaneus femoris lateralis was impaired in four patients after surgery. There was no re-dislocation, AVN, or infections in this group. Satisfactory clinical and radiologic results can be obtained by PAO with or without femoral osteotomy minor complications

Recurrent shoulder instability in those with bony defects is a difficult surgical problem to resolve. Burkhart and De Beer described an unacceptably high recurrence rate for arthroscopic Bankart repair in the presence of an inverted-pear glenoid with or without an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, with suggestions that an open modified Latarjet procedure should be recommended in such patients. The Congruent-Arc Latarjet is a modification of the Latarjet open bony stabilisation for shoulder instability developed by Burkhart and De Beer. It involves rotation of the coracoid so the curved under-surface lies congruent with the glenoid. At the Royal Derby Hospital, UK, this procedure has been adopted by our four shoulder surgeons, two of whom undertook fellowship training with De Beer, we studied the outcomes of the patients who had undergone the modified Congruent-Arc Latarjet procedure in our department. Fifty-two consecutive patients were identified over a five-year period at the Royal Derby Hospital or Derbyshire Royal Infirmary between 2006 and 2010 inclusive. With the approval of the clinical audit department, the data was collected using theatre records and clinical coding information to identify the patient group. A review of the case notes and local PACS system was undertaken to establish pre and post-operative examination findings, radiology findings regarding Hill-Sachs defects and glenoid bone loss, re-dislocation rates and post-operative function with return to normal activity. The endpoints of this study were aimed at finding out whether patients did return to normal function, were able to continue doing activity that would have provoked dislocation prior to surgery, and how many of the cases re-dislocated. No surgeon consultant had a patient who re-dislocated after this procedure. The follow-up period was from 1 year to 6 years post-operatively. The complications of this procedure were found to be the dislodgement of bone anchors in 2 patients, who required further arthroscopy to remove the suture anchor from the gleno-humeral joint. One patient had prolonged functionally limiting loss of external rotation, which resolved after intensive physiotherapy at 7 months follow up. We will provide graphical representation of the pre and post operative functional scores. We have demonstrated that the Congruent-Arc Latarjet is a reproducible procedure in the hands of surgeons other than the original authors, particularly when comparing our current 0% re-dislocation rate with the published literature, which suggests that 3.9% of patients undergoing this procedure with greater than 25% bone loss of the glenoid or an engaging Hill-Sachs will re-dislocate post-operatively, and this is better than the 6% re-dislocation rate of the standard Bristow-Latarjet procedure

Optimal management of acute patellar dislocation is still a topic of debate. Although, conventionally it has been managed by non-operative measures, recent literature recommends operative treatment to prevent re-dislocations. Our study recommends that results of non-operative measures comparable to that of operative management. Our study is the retrospective with 46 consecutive patients (47 knees) of first time patellar dislocation managed between 2012 and 2014. The study methodology highlighted upon the etiology, mechanism of injury and other characteristics of first time dislocations and also analysed outcomes of conservative management including re-dislocation rates. The duration of follow up ranged from 1 to 4 years. Average age at first-time dislocation was 23 years (Range 10–62 years). Male:Female ratio was 30:17. Twisting injury was the commonest cause. 1 patient required open reduction but all others relocated spontaneously or had successful closed reduction. Medial Patello-Femoral Ligament injury was frequent associated feature. 11 knees (24%) re-dislocated during follow up. Age was the significant risk factor for re-dislocations. All patients with re-dislocation were less than 30 years old. Maximum redislocations happened between 6 months to 1 year after index dislocation. Skeletal abnormality was the commonest pathology in re-dislocators. Only 4 patients (8.6%) finally required surgical intervention. One patient had persistent knee pain as a complication. Conservative management of primary patellar dislocation is successful in majority of patients. Surgery should be reserved for the carefully selected patients with specific indications

Purpose: Although arthroscopic Bankart repair is yet an established procedure in the treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability, it is still not known whether it reproduces the good results of the open repair procedure. Aim of this investigation was to compare the functional and subjective outcome between open and arthroscopic Bankart repair. Material and methods: A retrospective cross sectional study design on the comparison of open and arthoscopic Bankart treatments between 1995 and 2004 was implemented at the Dresden Orthopedic Surgery Department. In this period a total of 223 patients underwent surgery due to anterior shoulder instability, among which 212 patients had posttraumatic instability. A diagnostic arthroscopy was performed in all patients, but only 40 patients with intact capsulolabral complex and without capsular laxity were treated arthroscopically, the remaining 183 patients underwent an open Bankart procedure. A total of 186 patients with posttraumatic anterior instability could be clinically re-examined within 1 to 5 years after initial surgery, among which 147 patients underwent an open and 39 patients an arthroscopic Bankart procedure. The median age of this sample was 27 years (interquartile range 21 – 37 years) at initial surgery, 21% of these patients were female. Results: After open surgery 11 of 147 patients (8%) and 6 of 39 (15%) after arthroscopic surgery reported one or more re-dislocation after initial treatment, which occurred after a mean dislocation free time of 62 versus 40 months, respectively (95% confidence intervals 59 – 65 versus 36 – 44 months). Both a univariate analysis (Logrank test p=0.012) and a multivariate Cox regression analysis (Likelihood Ratio p=0.023) confirmed a statistically significant difference in the time between initial surgery to first reluxation. 4 of the 11 re-dislocations after open and 1 of 6 after arthroscopic surgery occurred after a new accident. That makes a re-dislocation rate without new adequate trauma of 5% after open and 13% after arthroscopic treatment. ROM showed no difference between open and arthroscopic Bankart procedure for abduction and a mild difference for external rotation. 21 of 115 (18%) patients had an external rotation lag of 20° or more after open surgery versus 1 of 34 (3%) after arthroscopic treatment (Fisher p=0,027). The Rowe score demonstrated “good” or “excellent” functional results in 102 of 117 (87%) patients versus 28 of 35 (80%) patients after open versus arthroscopic treatment (Fisher p=0,285). Conclusion: In this sample arthroscopic Bankart repair demonstrated more frequently and significantly earlier re-dislocation after initial surgery than did the open treatment alternative. External rotation lags of at least 20° occured more frequently after the open procedure

Primary traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder are common injuries which are complicated by persistent instability in a high proportion of patients. Surgery is successful and has been well described in the literature. Current controversies centre on the role of open and arthroscopic techniques. We describe the outcomes of a new mini-incision surgical (MIS) technique which was developed within our institution. 27 patients with traumatic shoulder instability (2 bilateral) were prospectively entered into a database between June 1998 and March 2008. The mean age was 31 years and the mean follow up period was 53 months. 29 shoulders underwent diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy and mini-incision surgery using a delto-pectoral approach and 3 bio-absorbable anchors. Patients reported no re-dislocation in 24 shoulders (83%). 5 shoulders, including one with a bony Bankart lesion, re-dislocated with additional trauma. One shoulder required revision to a Bristow-Latarjet. Satisfaction was very good in 16 and good in 9 shoulders (83%). 19 patients had minimal or no pain. 8 patients experienced moderate shoulder pain with the other two complaining of severe pain. QuickDASH scores were encouraging. Our technique combines the ability to appreciate all shoulder pathology arthroscopically with the visualisation gained in open Bankart surgery. Functionally, patients do well. The higher than expected re-dislocation rate is concerning. We advise that long term outcomes are needed

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the rate of Buford complex in a consecutive series of patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair and to evaluate the postoperative outcome compared to a group of patients without this anatomical variation. Material and Method: The surgical findings of 138 consecutive shoulder arthroscopies for Bankart lesions were prospective evaluated between January 2005 and January 2007; the mean of age was 25 years old (range 14–52). The criteria used to establish the diagnosis of Buford Complex included: cordlike middle glenohumeral ligament inserted in the superior labrum and attached to the biceps tendon, and complete absence of anterosuperior labrum. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated with Rowe score. Results: Five out of 138 patients (3.6%) presented a Buford complex associated to a Bankart lesion. Four of these patients (80%) presented a type II SLAP lesion. The follow up was 28 months (range 19–40 months). In the group of patients with the Buford complex the Rowe score had a mean of 75 points (range:45–95), 2 patients (40%) presented re-dislocation whereas in the other group the Rowe score had a mean 88 points (range: 25–100) and 9 cases (6.5%) had re-dislocation (P< 0.05). Conclusion: The rate of complex of Buford associated to Bankart lesion was of 3.6%. The presence of complex of Buford in our series was associated to worse functional postoperative outcomes

Background: The Bankart repair remains a safe and effective method for repairing instability in shoulder injuries. We report the results of a large series of patients treated using this technique. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 136 consecutively treated patients with either anterior, antero-inferior or multidirectional shoulder instability over a 7-year period from 1999–2006 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. All patients underwent open bankart repair through a deltopectoral approach, performed by a single surgeon. A thorough chart review was performed and patients were evaluated according to the Oxford Instability Score (OIS), the level of sport returned to, the influence of pre-operative physiotherapy and the incidence of redislocation. Results: Of the 136 identified patients, 108 (79%) responded to the questionnaire. Of the responders, there were 95 males and 13 women. The average age was 24 years (range 14–72). Ninety-one patients had confirmed dislocations whereas 17 suffered from subluxations. The majority of patients had either anterior or antero-inferior instability, whereas four (3.7%) had multidirectional deficits. The average time to surgery from the index instability incident ranged from 3 months to 10 years. The average OIS was 23 which corresponded to a good result. There was no significance found in the OIS in relation to the age of the patient or pre-operative physiotherapy. Significant associations with a better outcome included: delay to surgery greater than 12 months; and the absence of multidirectional instability. Of those who actively participated in sport, 75% returned to the same level of non-contact sport where only 47% returned to a similar level in collision sports. Eight patients (7.4%) experienced re-dislocation post open repair and 3 (2.8%) reported feelings of subluxation. Conclusions: Open bankart repair +/− capsulorrhaphy remains the gold standard for treatment of patients with shoulder instability. While our rate of success, in terms of re-dislocation, is equivalent to international norms, we found that a delay to surgery may be associated with a better outcome. Furthermore, the use of the Oxford Instability Score enables accurate and easy determination of the success of the operation

Introduction Traumatic shoulder dislocations at a young age result in a significant re-dislocation rates and lead to chronic instability. Conservative treatment fails in 25% to 96% of cases especially in young active patients. The accepted standard treatment is the classical open Bankart repair. Re-dislocation rate could be decreased to 3.5% to 14.9% but almost always results in loss of motion. The development of new techniques and devices has lead to an increase in arthroscopic techniques for shoulder stabilisations. Methods Between September 1996 and October 2000, 262 arthroscopic shoulder stabilisations were performed by one surgeon (ABI). For the refixation of the injured labrum suture anchors were used. In 159 cases FASTak (Arthrex) titanium anchors, in 26 cases Panalok (Mitek) and in 57 cases Suretac (Smith and Nephew) were used. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with a mean follow-up of 24.9 months (12 to 50). Exclusion criteria were SLAP and HAGL lesions, glenoid fractures, the inverted pear sign and hooked or posterior dislocations. Rowe score and a visual analogue scale were used to measure patient satisfaction. Results The Rowe score increased to 83.1 +/− 20.9. The visual analogoue score demonstrated overall patient satisfaction. The redislocation rate was five percent, three percent having a history of adequate trauma. Complaints of subluxations and ongoing instability occured in six percent. Eighty-nine percent of the patients could return to sports with 68% being able to return to their previous sports level. Conclusions This study demonstrates that arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation is comparable to the golden standard of open Bankart repair

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the functional outcome and recurrent dislocation rate in patients who have undergone arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with a bioabsorbable fixation device, Suretac (Acufex Microsurgical). The role of thermal capsular shrinkage was also investigated. Between June 1996 and June 2000, 78 consecutive patients (80 shoulders) at our hospital underwent arthroscopic stabilization with Suretac fixator by our senior author (DM). Twenty-one performed for acute post-traumatic dislocation (defined as first time dislocation), 41 for recurrent dislocations, 14 for SLAP lesions and four atraumatic multidirectional instability. Patients were followed up by an independent observer (FL) after a mean of 35 months (range: 9–62 months). The follow up examination included the modified Rowe and Zarins score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Constant score. The strength of lateral elevation as advocated in the Constant score was measured by the Nottingham Mecmesin Myometer. The overall re-dislocation rate after surgery was 14% (11 patients). This occurred after an average period of 23 months (range: 12–37 months) following the initial stabilization procedure. One patient also reported recurrent subluxation though without frank dislocation. The re-dislocation for patients with acute dislocation was 9%, 15% for recurrent dislocation, 14% for SLAP lesions and 25% for those with atraumatic multidirectional instability. 3 of the 19 patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization and thermal capsular shrinkage also re-dislocated. Four of the 10 patients who were aged 18 or under at the time of surgery, re-dislocated after an average period of 18 months following the operation. Our study shows that the functional outcome and recurrence rate of Suretac stabilization compare favorably to other arthroscopic repair techniques using nonabsorbable suture anchors. The results appear to be better in patients with acute post traumatic dislocation. We do not recommend its use in younger patients (18 or under) especially with multidirectional instability. There is not enough evidence in our study to support the theoretical benefits of thermal capsular shrinkage

Aim: The re-dislocation rates in adults (< 30 years) in the initial 12 months after first, anterior, traumatic (FAT) shoulder dislocations treated non-operatively vary from 25% to 95%. The purpose of this study was to establish if arthroscopic surgery reduces the incidence of recurrent instability (failure) after such dislocations when compared to non-operative treatment. Material and Methods: Specific search terms were used to retrieve relevant studies from various databases extending from 1966 to May 2004. Guidelines for reporting of meta-analysis, adapted from QUOROM statement were followed. Results: 13 studies involving 433 shoulders were reviewed. Group A included 84 shoulders treated by arthroscopic lavage without stabilisation. There were no subluxations. The re-dislocation rate was 14.3% (12/84). Group B had 179 shoulders treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. The incidence of subluxation was 5.02% (9/179) and dislocation was 6.14% (11/179). Failure following arthroscopic lavage (12/84 – 14.3%) was significantly higher than after arthroscopic stabilisation (20/179 – 11.2%). [p= 0.04, Relative risk = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.05]. Group C involved 170 shoulders treated non-operatively. The incidence of subluxation was 8% (12/150) and dislocation was 62% (93/150). The overall incidence of failure was 70% (119/170). Failure following arthroscopic intervention (32/263 – 12.2%) was significantly lower than following non-operative treatment (119/170 – 70%) [p< 0.0001, Relative risk = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.24]. Conclusion: Early arthroscopic surgery appears to reduce recurrent instability during the initial 12 months after FAT shoulder dislocation in young adults (< 30 years) when compared to non-operative treatment. Arthroscopic stabilisation may be considered for young, athletic patients and those involved in contact sports or defence personnel, who are at a high risk of recurrent instability after FAT shoulder dislocation. RCTs reporting on a larger number of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years are required before one can draw firm conclusions on the ability of arthroscopic intervention to influence the natural history of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation

Aims: The re-dislocation rates in adults (< 30 years) in the initial 12 months after FAT (first,anterior,traumatic) shoulder dislocations treated non-operatively vary from 25% to 95%. Some surgeons advocate early arthroscopic surgery following such dislocations as this appears to reduce recurrent instability. The purpose of this study was to establish if arthroscopic surgery reduces the incidence of recurrent instability after such dislocations when compared to non-operative treatment. Material and Methods: Specific search terms were used to retrieve relevant studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL extending from 1966 to October 2003. Guidelines for reporting of meta-analysis, adapted from QUOROM statement were followed. Adults under 30 years of age, with clinical and radiological confirmation of anterior dislocation following trauma with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Patients with previous shoulder problems, generalised joint laxity, neurological injury, impingement and a history of substance abuse were excluded. Results: 13 studies involving 433 shoulders were reviewed. Group A included 84 shoulders treated by arthroscopic lavage without stabilisation. There were no subluxations. The re-dislocation rate was 14.3% (12/84). Group B had 179 shoulders treated by arthroscopic stabilisation. The incidence of subluxation was 5.02% (9/179) and dislocation was 6.14% (11/179). Recurrent instability (subluxation /dislocation) following arthroscopic lavage (12/84 – 14.3%) was significantly higher than after arthroscopic stabilisation (20/179 – 11.2%). [p= 0.04, Relative risk = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.05]. Group C involved 170 shoulders treated non-operatively. The incidence of subluxation was 8% (12/150) and dislocation was 62% (93/150). The overall incidence of recurrent instability was 70% (119/170). Recurrent instability following arthroscopic intervention (32/263 – 12.2%) was significantly lower than following non-operative treatment (119/170 – 70%) [p< 0.0001, Relative risk = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.24]. Conclusion: Early arthroscopic surgery reduces recurrent instability during the initial 12 months after FAT shoulder dislocation in young adults (< 30 years) when compared to non-operative treatment. Arthroscopic treatment should be offered to young, athletic patients especially those involved in contact sports or defence personnel, who are at a high risk of recurrent instability after initial shoulder dislocation. Further randomised control trials reporting on a larger number of patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years are required before one can draw firm conclusions on the ability of arthroscopic intervention to influence the natural history of FAT shoulder dislocation

Recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a complex, multifactorial problem that has been shown to be the most common indication for revision THA. At our center, we have tried to approach the unstable hip by identifying the primary cause of instability and correcting that at the time of revision surgery. Type 1:. Malposition of the acetabular component treated with revision of the acetabular component and upsizing the femoral head. Type 2:. Malposition of the femoral component treated with revision of the femur and upsizing the femoral head. Type 3:. Abductor deficiency treated with a constrained liner or dual mobility bearing. Type 4:. Soft tissue or bony impingement treated with removal of impingement sources and upsizing the femoral head. Type 5:. Late wear of the bearing treated with bearing surface exchange and upsizing the femoral head. Type 6:. Unclear etiology treated with a constrained liner or dual mobility articulation. These may be patients with abnormal spino-pelvic motion. The most common etiologies of instability in our experience include cup malposition (Type 1) and abductor deficiency (Type 3). We reviewed 75 hips revised for instability and at a mean 35.3 months 11 re-dislocations occurred (14.6%). Acetabular revisions were protective against re-dislocation (p<0.02). The number of previous operations (p=0.04) and previously failed constrained liners (p<0.02) were risk factors for failure. The highest risk of failure was in patients with abductor insufficiency with revisions for other etiologies having a success rate of 90%. Although instability can be multifactorial, by identifying the primary cause of instability, a rational approach to treatment can be formulated. In general the poorest results were seen in patients with abductor deficiency. Given the high rate of failure of constrained liners (9 of the 11 failures were constrained), we currently are exploring alternatives such as dual mobility articulations. Our early experience with dual mobility suggests improved results when compared to constrained liners

Recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a complex, multifactorial problem that has been shown to be the most common indication for revision THA. At our center, we have tried to approach the unstable hip by identifying the primary cause of instability and correcting that at the time of revision surgery. Type 1: Malposition of the acetabular component treated with revision of the acetabular component and upsizing the femoral head. Type 2: Malposition of the femoral component treated with revision of the femur and upsizing the femoral head. Type 3: Abductor deficiency treated with a constrained liner or dual mobility bearing. Type 4: Soft tissue or bony impingement treated with removal of impingement sources and upsizing the femoral head. Type 5: Late wear of the bearing treated with bearing surface exchange and upsizing the femoral head. Type 6: Unclear etiology treated with a constrained liner or dual mobility articulation. The most common etiologies of instability in our experience include cup malposition (Type 1) and abductor deficiency (Type 3). We reviewed 75 hips revised for instability and at a mean 35.3 months, 11 re-dislocations occurred (14.6%). Acetabular revisions were protective against re-dislocation (p<0.02). The number of previous operations (p=0.04) and previously failed constrained liners (p<0.02) were risk factors for failure. The highest risk of failure was in patients with abductor insufficiency with revisions for other etiologies having a success rate of 90%. Although instability can be multifactorial, by identifying the primary cause of instability, a rational approach to treatment can be formulated. In general, the poorest results were seen in patients with abductor deficiency. Given the high rate of failure of constrained liners (9 of the 11 failures were constrained), we currently are exploring alternatives such as dual mobility articulations. Our early experience with dual mobility suggests improved results when compared to constrained liners