Introduction: Althoug the advantages of partial revision in hip replacement are well-documented, the effectiveness of this treatment strategy has not been established in revision TKA. The purpose of this study is compare the results of tibial component versus full–component (Miller-Galante II-MG II to Constrained Condylar Knee-CCK) revision TKA for wear-related problems.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was used to identify who had partial revision TKA. Over a 10-year period, 55 revision TKAs were completed. All the primary arthroplasties were MG II hybrid primary arthroplasties (uncemented femoral component, cemented tibial component, cemented patellar resurfacing). Twenty-five partial revisions (tibial component and polyethylene exchange) and 30 full-component revision TKAs were done. The average follow-up was 5.2 years. Knee Society clinical scores were used to compare patients who had tibial revision with patients who had full-component revision.

Results: The average Knee Society score for full component revisions was 85 compared to 63 for partial revisions (significant difference).

Discussion and Conclusion: We recommend caution in doing isolated tibial revisions in which retaining the femoral component limits the surgeon options to properly balance the knee. Full revision should be done if there is any question regarding ligamentous balancing or equalization of flexion and extension gaps.

Aims

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs in approximately 1% to 2% of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) presenting multiple challenges, such as difficulty in diagnosis, technical complexity, and financial costs. Two-stage exchange is the gold standard for treating PJI but emerging evidence suggests 'two-in-one' single-stage revision as an alternative, delivering comparable outcomes, reduced morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. This study investigates five-year results of modified single-stage revision for treatment of PJI following TKA with bone loss.

The demand for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has grown significantly in recent years. The two major fixation methods for stems in revision TKA include cemented and ‘hybrid’ fixation. We explore the optimal fixation method using data from recent, well-designed comparative studies. We performed a systematic review of comparative studies published within the last 10 years with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. To allow for missing data, a random-effects meta-analysis of all available cases was performed. The odds ratio (OR) for the relevant outcome was calculated with 95% confidence intervals. The effects of small studies were analyzed using a funnel plot, and asymmetry was assessed using Egger's test. The primary outcome measure was all-cause failure. Secondary outcome measures included all-cause revision, aseptic revision and radiographic failure. There was a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems when compared to cemented stems (p = 0.006) (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87). Heterogeneity was 4.3% and insignificant (p = 0.39). There was a trend toward superior hybrid performance for all other outcome measures including all-cause re-revision, aseptic re-revision and radiographic failure. Recent evidence suggests a significantly lower failure rate for hybrid stems in revision TKA. There is also a trend favoring the use of hybrid stems for all outcome variables assessed in this study. This is the first time a significant difference in outcome has been demonstrated through systematic review of these two modes of stem fixation. We therefore recommend the use, where possible, of hybrid stems in revision TKA

Background. As life expectancy increases, the number of octogenarians requiring primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Recently, primary TKA has become a common treatment option in octogenarians. However, surgeons are still hesitant about performing revision TKA on octogenarians because of concerning about risk- and cost-benefit. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative complications and mid-term survival in octogenarians following primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 231 primary TKAs and 41 revision TKAs performed on octogenarians between 2000 and 2016. The mean age was 81.9 for primary TKA and 82.3 for revision TKA (p=0.310). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was not different, but the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was higher in revision TKA (4.4 vs. 4.8, p=0.003). The mean follow-up period did not differ (3.8 vs. 3.5 years, p=0.451). The WOMAC scores and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative complication and survival rate (end point; death determined by telephone or mail communication with patient or family) were investigated. Results. The postoperative WOMAC and ROM were better in primary TKA (33.1 vs. 47.2, p<0.001; 128.9° vs. 113.6°, p<0.001). The most common postoperative complication was delirium in both groups (7.4% vs. 14.6%, p=0.131). There were no differences in the specific complication rates between the two groups. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 87.2% and 62.9%, respectively, in primary TKA and 82.1% and 42.2%, respectively, in revision TKA (p=0.017). Conclusions. Both primary and revision TKAs are viable options for octogenarians when considering the clinical results and mid-term survival. Delirium needs to be managed appropriately as the most common complication in both primary and revision TKAs for octogenarians

Abstract. Approximately 20% of primary and revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) patients require multiple revisions, which are associated with poor survivorship, with worsening outcomes for subsequent revisions. For revision surgery, either endoprosthetic replacements or metaphyseal sleeves can be used for the repair, however, in cases of severe defects that are deemed “too severe” for reconstruction, endoprosthetic replacement of the affected area is recommended. However, endoprosthetic replacements have been associated with high complication rates (high incidence rates of prosthetic joint infection), while metaphyseal sleeves have a more acceptable complication profile and are therefore preferred. Despite this, no guidance exists as to the maximal limit of bone loss, which is acceptable for the use of metaphyseal sleeves to ensure sufficient axial and rotational stability. Therefore, this study assessed the effect of increasing bone loss on the primary stability of the metaphyseal sleeve in the proximal tibia to determine the maximal bone loss that retains axial and rotational stability comparable to a no defect control. Methods. to determine the pattern of bone loss and the average defect size that corresponds to the clinically defined defect sizes of small, medium and large defects, a series of pre-operative x-rays of patients with who underwent revision TKA were retrospectively analysed. Ten tibiae sawbones were used for the experiment. To prepare the bones, the joint surface was resected the typical resection depth required during a primary TKA (10mm). Each tibia was secured distally in a metal pot with perpendicular screws to ensure rotational and axial fixation to the testing machine. Based on X-ray findings, a fine guide wire was placed 5mm below the cut joint surface in the most medial region of the plateau. Core drills (15mm, 25mm and 35mm) corresponding to small, medium and large defects were passed over the guide wire allowing to act at the centre point, before the bone defect was created. The test was carried out on a control specimen with no defect, and subsequently on a Sawbone with a small, medium or large defect. Sleeves were inserted using the published operative technique, by trained individual using standard instruments supplied by the manufacturers. Standard axial pull-out (0 – 10mm) force and torque (0 – 30°) tests were carried out, recording the force (N) vs. displacement (mm) curves. Results. A circular defect pattern was identified across all defects, with the centre of the defect located 5mm below the medial tibial base plate, and as medial as possible. Unlike with large defects, small and medium sized defects reduced the pull-out force and torque at the bone-implant interface, however, these reductions were not statistically significant when compared to no bony defect. Conclusions. This experimental study demonstrated that up to 35mm radial defects may be an acceptable “critical limit” for bone loss below which metaphyseal sleeve use may still be appropriate. Further clinical assessment may help to confirm the findings of this experimental study. This study is the first in the literature to aim to quantify “critical bone loss” limit in the tibia for revision knee arthroplasty. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Aim. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) aggravates an already difficult treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). The prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens varies across countries and increases over time. Regular monitoring of bacteriological analyses should be performed. Due to many factors influencing the AMR, the correct choice of antimicrobial management remains arguable. The primary purpose of this retrospective study was to identify and compare causative bacteria and to compare the incidence of antibiotic resistance between the septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and septic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Method. A review of all revision TKAs and revision THAs, undertaken between 2007 and 2020 in a tertiary referral centre, was performed. Included were cases meeting the consensus criteria for PJI, in which an organism has been identified. There were no major differences in tissue sampling between revision TKAs and revision THAs over time. Results. A total of 228 bacterial strains, isolated after revision TKA and THA, were analysed for their resistance to 20 different antibiotics. There was a statistically significant higher occurrence of Gram-negative bacteria (p=0.002) and Enterococcus species (p=0.026) identified after revision THAs compared to TKA. The comparison of antibiotic resistance between revision TKAs and revision THAs was statistically significant in 9 of 20 analysed antibiotics. Pathogens isolated after revision THA were much more resistant compared to pathogens isolated after revision TKA. Resistance in revision THAs was significantly higher to oxacillin (p=0.03), ciprofloxacin (p<0.001), levofloxacin (p<0.001), moxifloxacin (p=0.005), clindamycin (p<0.001), co-trimoxazole (p<0.001), imipenem (p=0.01), rifampicin (p=0.005) and tetracycline (p=0.009). There was no significantly higher resistance of pathogens isolated after revision TKAs detected. No statistically significant difference in antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria between revision TKA and revision THA was observed. Conclusions. The occurrence and the resistance of bacteria to antibiotics differs significantly between revision TKAs and revision THAs. This has implications on of the choice of empirical antibiotic in revision surgery as well as prophylactic antibiotic in primary surgery, depending on the joint that is to be replaced

Introduction. The primary aim of this study was to describe a baseline comparison of early knee-specific functional outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using metaphyseal sleeves with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aim was to compare incidence of complications and length of stay (LOS) between the two groups. Methods. Patients undergoing revision TKA for all diagnoses between 2009 and 2016 had patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected prospectively. PROMs consisted of the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12). The study cohort was identified retrospectively and demographics were collected. The cohort was matched to a control group of patients undergoing primary TKA. Results. Overall, 72 patients underwent revision TKA and were matched with 72 primary TKAs with a mean follow-up of 57 months (standard deviation (SD) 20 months). The only significant difference in postoperative PROMs was a worse AKSS pain score in the revision group (36 vs 44, p = 0.002); however, these patients still produced an improvement in the pain score. There was no significant difference in improvement of AKSS or SF-12 between the two groups. LOS (9.3 days vs 4.6 days) and operation time (1 hour 56 minutes vs 1 hour 7 minutes) were significantly higher in the revision group (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing revision were significantly more likely to require intraoperative lateral release and postoperative urinary catheterisation (p < 0.001). Conclusion. This matched-cohort study provides results of revision TKA using modern techniques and implants and outlines what results patients can expect to achieve using primary TKA as a control. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients for revision TKA

Aims. Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Studies were identified by searching electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase, from their inception to November 2020, for studies evaluating TKA patients with metal hypersensitivity/allergy. All studies reporting on diagnosing or managing metal hypersensitivity in TKA were included. Data were extracted and summarized based on study design, study population, interventions and outcomes. A practical guide is then formulated based on the available evidence. Results. We included 38 heterogeneous studies (two randomized controlled trials, six comparative studies, 19 case series, and 11 case reports). The evidence indicates that metal hypersensitivity is a rare complication with some histopathological features leading to pain and dissatisfaction with no reliable screening tests preoperatively. Hypoallergenic implants are viable alternatives for patients with self-reported/confirmed metal hypersensitivity if declared preoperatively; however, concerns remain over their long-term outcomes with ceramic implants outperforming titanium nitride-coated implants and informed consent is paramount. For patients presenting with painful TKA, metal hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion where patch skin testing, lymphocyte transformation test, and synovial biopsies are useful adjuncts before revision surgery is undertaken to hypoallergenic implants with shared decision-making and informed consent. Conclusion. Using the limited available evidence in the literature, we provide a practical approach to metal hypersensitivity in TKA patients. Future national/registry-based studies are needed to identify the scale of metal hypersensitivity, agreed diagnostic criteria, and management strategies. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):785–795

Aim. Several options to standardize the definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been created including the 2013 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), 2018 Intentional Consensus Meeting (ICM), and the 2019 proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Synovial fluid biomarkers have been investigated in an effort to simplify and improve the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of a calprotectin point of care (POC) test for diagnosing PJI in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients comparing different sets of criteria (2013 MSIS, 2018 ICM, and 2019 EBJIS criteria) used to define patients as with or without infection. Method. From October 2018 to January 2020 and under IRB approval 123 intraoperative samples of synovial fluid were prospectively collected at two academic hospitals in the same institution from revision TKA patients. All patients underwent standard clinical and laboratory evaluation for PJI at our institution, allowing for categorization using the 3 criteria. Patients were adjudicated by 2 blinded and independent reviewers for the 3 sets of criteria. The 3 criteria agreed 91.8% of the time. Four likely cases by the 2019 proposed EBJIS were considered unlikely and 1 inconclusive case by the 2018 ICM was considered not infected for the purposes of analysis. Calprotectin POC testing followed manufacturer's instructions using a threshold of >50 mg/L to indicate PJI. Sensitivities, specificities, PPV, NPV, and areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for the 3 sets of criteria. Results. Using 2013 MSIS criteria the calprotectin POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV AUC of 98.1%, 95.7%, 94.5%, 98.5%, and 0.969, respectively. Using 2018 ICM the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and (AUC) of 98.2%, 98.5%, 98.2%, 98.5%, and 0.984, respectively. Using the 2019 proposed EBJIS criteria the POC test demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and area under the curve (AUC) of 93.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 94.2%, and 0.966, respectively. Conclusions. The calprotectin lateral flow POC test has an excellent sensitivity and specificity regardless of the set of criteria used to define PJI. These results are promising and suggest that the calprotectin lateral flow test may be used as a rule out test in a cost-conscious health care model or when conventional diagnostic tools may not be available. Further investigations of the calprotectin PCO test must be completed to validate these results

Aims. Current guidelines consider analyses of joint aspirates, including leucocyte cell count (LC) and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) as a diagnostic mainstay of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is unclear if these parameters are subject to a certain degree of variability over time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of LC and PMN% in patients with aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. We conducted a prospective, double-centre study of 40 patients with 40 knee joints. Patients underwent joint aspiration at two different time points with a maximum period of 120 days in between these interventions and without any events such as other joint aspirations or surgeries. The main indications for TKA revision surgery were aseptic implant loosening (n = 24) and joint instability (n = 11). Results. Overall, 80 synovial fluid samples of 40 patients were analyzed. The average time period between the joint aspirations was 50 days (SD 32). There was a significantly higher percentage change in LC when compared to PMN% (44.1% (SD 28.6%) vs 27.3% (SD 23.7%); p = 0.003). When applying standard definition criteria, LC counts were found to skip back and forth between the two time points with exceeding the thresholds in up to 20% of cases, which was significantly more compared to PMN% for the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria (p = 0.001), as well as for Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) (p = 0.029). Conclusion. LC and PMN% are subject to considerable variation. According to its higher interindividual variance, LC evaluation might contribute to false-positive or false-negative results in PJI assessment. Single LC testing prior to TKA revision surgery seems to be insufficient to exclude PJI. On the basis of the obtained results, PMN% analyses overrule LC measurements with regard to a conclusive diagnostic algorithm. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):566–572

Introduction. Tibial cones are often utilized in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with metaphyseal defects. However, there are few studies evaluating outcomes out to five years with a sufficient cohort. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implant survivorship and complications in revision TKAs with tibial cones. Methods. A retrospective review was completed from September 2006 through March 2018 evaluating 149 revision TKAs that received a tibial cone. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years. According to the AORI classification: 8% were 1, 18% were 2A, 55% were 2B, and 19% were 3. Results. Survival analysis at 6 years showed 96% free of revision for aseptic tibial loosening, 85% free of tibial component revision for any reason, and 72% free of reoperation. Eleven knees had progressive radiolucent lines with eight having tibial construct migration on serial radiographs. Aseptic tibial loosening was associated with significant tibial bone loss, AORI 3 (p=0.0001). Tibial component revision for any reason was associated with AORI 3 (p=0.013) and a pre-revision diagnosis of reimplantation after PJI (p<0.0001). Four knees had revision for aseptic tibial loosening, 12 knees had revision of the tibial construct for reasons other than aseptic loosening (11/12 were for PJI), and 15 knees had reoperation for reasons other than tibial construct revision. Conclusions. Revision TKA with tibial cones had excellent survivorship free of revision for tibial construct aseptic loosening, 96% at 6 years. Patients receiving a tibial cone construct at the time of reimplantation for PJI were at increased risk for tibial construct revision

Abstract. Objective. In this systematic review we aim to compare wound complication rates from Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to dry sterile surgical dressings in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. A search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included those investigating the use of NPWT in primary and revision TKA. Exclusion criteria included studies investigating NPWT not related to primary or revision TKA; studies in which data relating to NPWT was not accessible; missing data; without an available full text, or not well reported. We also excluded studies with poor scientific methodology. All publications were limited to the English language. Abstracts, case reports, conference presentations, and reviews were excluded. Welch independent sample t-test was used for the statistical analysis. Results. Our review identified 11 studies evaluating 1,414 patients. Of the 1,181 primary TKA patients analysed (NPWT = 416, surgical dressing = 765), the overall wound complication rates in patients receiving NPWT ranged from 0% – 63% (Median 7.30%, SD ± 21.44) This is in comparison to complication rates of 2.8% – 19% (Median 6.50%, SD ± 6.59) in the dry dressing group. The difference in complication rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (p =0.337). In the revision TKA cohort of 279 patients (NPWT group = 128, dry dressing group = 151), the overall wound complication rates in the NPWT group ranged between 6.7% – 12% (Median 9.80%, SD ± 2.32) vs 23.8% – 30% (Median 26.95%, SD ± 2.53) in the dry dressing group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion. NPWT dressing demonstrated statistically significant reduction in wound complication rates when used in revision TKA but not primary TKA when compared to dry sterile dressings. This is probably due to higher wound related risks encountered with revision TKA surgery compared to primary TKA surgery. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming increasingly common in the United States as the population ages and larger numbers of primary TKA are performed in younger individuals. Cemented or uncemented tibial stems are frequently used in revision cases. Decreased clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction have been described for revision TKA. This study aims to determine if the presence of overall pain and tibial pain at the end of the stem differs between cemented and uncemented tibial stems in revision TKA. Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing patients who underwent revision TKA utilizing cemented or uncemented tibial stems in a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included age under 18, isolated revisions of the femoral component or polyethylene exchanges, lack of preoperative or postoperative imaging, insufficient operative or implant records available for electronic chart review, revision procedures performed at outside facilities, patients who were deceased at the time of survey administration, refusal to participate in the study, and failure to return the mailed survey or respond to a telephone follow-up questionnaire. Radiographic analysis included calculation of the percentage of the tibial canal filled with the implant, as well as measurement of the diameter of the tibial stem. Radiographs were also reviewed for evidence of cavitary defects, pedestal formation, radiolucent lines, and periprosthetic fractures. Mailed surveys addressing overall pain, tibial pain, and satisfaction were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and the independent sample t-test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for age, gender, and preoperative bone loss. Results. A total of 110 patients were included (63 cemented and 47 uncemented stems). No statistically significant differences in stem length, operative side, or indications for revision were found. The uncemented group had a significantly higher percent canal fill (p < 0.0001). Tibial pain at the end of the stem was present in 25.3% of cemented stems and 25.5% of uncemented stems (p = 1.00). There was a trend towards more overall pain in the uncemented cohort, but this did not reach statistical significance. Only 74.6% of cemented patients and 78.7% of uncemented patients were satisfied following revision TKA (p = 0.66). Conclusion. The data supports our hypothesis that there are no differences in end-of-stem pain or overall pain between cemented and uncemented tibial stems in revision TKA. High rates of dissatisfaction were noted in both cohorts postoperatively, consistent with previous literature. Patient factors likely play a large role in the presence of postoperative pain. These factors should be further evaluated in future studies in an effort to reduce pain and improve patient satisfaction

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed secondary to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These poor outcomes may be further complicated by the development of postoperative infection requiring aggressive antibiotic treatment. However, this antibiotic overuse may suppress patients' native bacterial flora, leading to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With the increased demand for primary TKAs and expected rise in revision TKA due to PJI, it is important to identify factors contributing to CDI. Therefore, we aimed to study the: 1) incidence, 2) demographics, length of stay (LOS), and total costs, and 3) risk factors and mortality associated with CDI in revision TKA patients. The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for all individuals diagnosed with PJI and who underwent revision TKA between 2009 and 2013. Patients who developed CDI during their in-patient hospital stay were identified, yielding 83,806 patients (799 with CDI) with a mean age of 65 (S.D.=11.2). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between hospital- and patient-specific characteristics and the development of CDI. During the study period, the overall incidence of CDI after revision TKA was 1%. These patients were significantly older (mean age 69.05 vs. 65.52 yrs), had greater LOS (median 11 vs. 5 days), had greater costs ($30,612.93 vs. 18,873.75), and had higher in-hospital mortality (3.6 vs. 0.5%, p < 0 .001 for all) compared to those without infection. Patients with CDI were more likely to be treated in urban, not-for-profit, medium or large bed-sized hospitals located in the Northeast or Midwest (p < 0 .05 for all). Patients with underlying depression (OR 4.267, p=0.007) or fluid/electrolyte disorders (OR 3.48, p=0.001) were more likely to develop infection. Although CDI is a rare event following revision TKA, it can have detrimental consequences. Our report demonstrates that CDI is associated with longer LOS, higher costs, and greater in-hospital mortality. With increased legislative pressure to lower healthcare expenditures, it is crucial to identify means of preventing costly complications

Aims. Calcium sulphate has traditionally been used as a filler of dead space arising during surgery. Various complications have been described following the use of Stimulan bio-absorbable calcium sulphate beads. This study is a prospective observational study to assess the safety profile of these beads when used in revision arthroplasty, comparing the complication rates with those reported in the literature. Methods. A total of 755 patients who underwent 456 revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) and 299 revision total hip arthroplasties (THA), with a mean follow-up of 35 months (0 to 78) were included in the study. Results. A total of 32 patients (4.2%) had wound drainage, and this was higher with higher bead volumes and in McPherson grade C patients. There was also a significantly higher bead volume in the 41 patients who developed hypercalcaemia, two of which were symptomatic (p < 0.0001). A total of 13 patients (1.7%) had heterotopic ossification (HO). There was no statistically significant relationship between the development of HO and bead volume (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The strength of this study lies in the large number of patients and the detailed data collection, making it the most comprehensive report available in the literature on the use of calcium sulphate-based bone substitutes. Cite this article: R. Kallala, W. Edwin Harris, M. Ibrahim, M. Dipane, E. McPherson. Use of Stimulan absorbable calcium sulphate beads in revision lower limb arthroplasty: Safety profile and complication rates. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:570–579. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2017-0319.R1

Instability accounts for approximately 20% of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) operations, however, diagnostic tests remain relatively subjective. The aim of this examination was to evaluate the feasibility of using pressure mat analyses during functional tasks to identify abnormal biomechanics associated with TKA instability. Five patients (M = 4; age = 69.80±7.05 years; weight = 79.73±20.12 kg) with suspected TKA instability were examined compared to 10 healthy controls (M = 4; age = 44.6±7.52 years; weight = 70.80±14.65). Peak pressure and time parameters were measured during normal gait and two-minute bilateral stance. Side-to-side pressure distribution was calculated over 10-second intervals during the second minute. Mann-Whitney tests compared loading parameters between groups and side-to-side differences in TKA patients (significance level = p<0.05). Pressure distribution was expressed relative to bodyweight. Notable differences were seen during bilateral stance. Uneven side loading was greater – favouring the non-operated limb – in TKA patients during bilateral stance compared to controls. This was significantly different at 30s (p=0.0336) and 60s (p=0.0336). Gait analyses showed subtle pressure distribution differences in unstable TKA patients. Stance time was indifferent. TKA patients tended to exhibit longer heel contact time (0.76s vs. 0.64s and reduced weight acceptance (50.75% vs. 56.75%) on the operated limb compared to the non-operated limb. Side-to-side differences in peak toe-off forces were significantly more pronounced in TKA patients versus controls (9.25% +/− 1.5% vs. 1.67% +/−5.79%; p=0.0039). Conclusion: This feasibility work demonstrates subtle differences in limb loading mechanics during simple clinical tests in unstable TKA patients that might be invisible to the naked eye. In the long-term, pressure analyses may be a useful diagnostic tool in identifying patients that would benefit from revision surgery for TKA instability

Instability accounts for approximately 20% of all revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however diagnostic tests remain crude and subjective. The aim of this examination was to evaluate the feasibility of pressure mat (SB Mat, TekScan) analyses of functional tasks to differentiate instability in a clinical setting. Five patients (M = 4; age = 69.80±7.05 years; weight = 79.73±20.12 kg) with suspected TKA instability were examined compared to five healthy controls (M = 1; age = 46.80±7.85 years; weight = 71.54±16.17 kg). Peak pressure and time parameters were measured during normal gait and two-minute bilateral stance. Side-to-side pressure distribution was calculated over 10-second intervals during the second minute. Pressure distributions were expressed relative to bodyweight (%BW). T-tests compared loading parameters between groups (significance level = p<0.05). Analyses showed subtle differences in pressure distribution in unstable TKA patients versus healthy controls. Stance time during gait was indifferent. TKA patients tended to exhibit longer heel contact time (0.76 vs. 0.64 sec) and reduced weight acceptance (50.75% vs. 56.75%) on the operated versus non-operated limb. Side-to-side differences in toe-off forces were significantly more pronounced in TKA patients versus controls (9.25% vs. 3.75%; p=0.0088). Uneven loading was significantly greater – favouring the non-operated limb – in TKA patients during bilateral stance compared to controls (p<0.05). This feasibility work demonstrates subtle differences in limb loading and biomechanics during simple clinical tests in unstable TKA patients that might be undetectable to the naked eye. Pressure analyses may therefore be a useful diagnostic tool. These findings warrant further investigation

The management of bone loss in revision total knee replacement (TKA) remains a challenge. To accomplish the goals of revision TKA, the surgeon needs to choose the appropriate implant design to “fix the problem,” achieve proper component placement and alignment, and obtain robust short- and long-term fixation. Proper identification and classification of the extent of bone loss and deformity will aid in preoperative planning. Extensive bone loss may be due to progressive osteolysis (a mechanism of failure), or as a result of intraoperative component removal. The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) is a useful classification system that individually describes femoral and tibial defects by the appearance, severity, and location of bone defects. This system provides a guideline to treatment and enables preoperative planning on radiographs. In Type 1 defects, femoral and tibial defects are characterised by minor contained deficiencies at the bone-implant interface. Metaphyseal bone is intact and the integrity of the joint line is not compromised. In this scenario, the best reconstruction option is to increase the thickness of bone resection and to fill the defect with cancellous bone graft or cement. Type 2 defects are characterised by deficient metaphyseal bone involving one or more femoral condyle(s) or tibial plateau(s). The peripheral rim of cortical bone may be intact or partially compromised, and the joint line is abnormal. Reconstruction options for a Type 2A defect include impaction bone grafting, cement, or more commonly, prosthetic augmentation (e.g. sleeves, augments or wedges). In Type 2B defects, metaphyseal bone of both femoral condyles or both tibial plateaus is deficient. The peripheral rim of cortical bone may be intact or partially compromised, and the joint line is abnormal. Options for a Type 2B defect include impaction grafting, bulk structural allograft, prosthetic augmentation, metaphyseal sleeves (in some cases), or metaphyseal cones. Finally, in the presence of a Type 3 deficiency, both metaphyseal and cortical bone is deficient and there is partial or complete disruption of the collateral ligament attachments. In this case, the most commonly used reconstruction options include hinged implants or megaprostheses with or without bulk structural allograft, prosthetic augmentation, and/or metaphyseal/diaphyseal sleeves or cones. Today, we are fortunate to have a wide variety of options available to aid in reconstruction of a revision TKA with massive bone loss. Historically, use of cement, bone grafting, or use of a tumor-type or hinged implant were considered the main options for reconstruction. The development and adoption of highly porous sleeves and cones has given the surgeon a new and potentially more durable option for reconstruction of previously difficult to treat defects. Using radiographs and computed tomography, surgeons are able to preoperatively classify bone loss and anticipate a reconstruction plan based upon the classification; however, it is always important to have several back-up options on hand during revision surgery in the event bone loss is worse than expected

Introduction. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has been shown to facilitate detection of microbes in a clinical sample, particularly in the setting of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, it is unknown whether every microbial DNA signal detected by NGS is clinically relevant. This multi-institutional study was conceived to 1) identify species detected by NGS that may predict PJI, then 2) build a predictive model for PJI in a developmental cohort; and 3) validate the predictive utility of the model in a separate multi-institutional cohort. Methods. This multicenter investigation involving 15 academic institutions prospectively collected samples from 194 revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) and 184 revision hip arthroplasties (THA) between 2017–2019. Patients undergoing reimplantation or spacer exchange procedures were excluded. Synovial fluid, deep tissue and swabs were obtained at the time of surgery and shipped to MicrogenDx (Lubbock, TX) for NGS analysis. Deep tissue specimens were also sent to the institutional labs for culture. All patients were classified per the 2018 Consensus definition of PJI. Microbial DNA analysis of community similarities (ANCOM) was used to identify 17 candidate bacterial species out of 294 (W-value >50) for differentiating infected vs. noninfected cases. Logistic Regression with LASSO model selection and random forest algorithms were then used to build a model for predicting PJI. For this analysis, ICM classification was the response variable (gold standard) and the species identified through ANCOM were the predictor variables. Recruited cases were randomly split in half, with one half designated as the training set, and the other half as the validation set. Using the training set, a model for PJI diagnosis was generated. The optimal resulting model was then tested for prediction ability with the validation set. The entire model-building procedure and validation was iterated 1000 times. From the model set, distributions of overall assignment rate, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predicative value (NPV) were assessed. Results. The overall predictive accuracy achieved in the model was 75.9% (Figure 1). There was a high accuracy in true-negative and false-negative classification of patients using this predictive model (Figure 2), which has previously been a criticism of NGS interpretation and reporting. Specificity was 97.1%, PPV was 75.0%, and NPV was 76.2%. On comparison of the distribution of abundances between ICM-positive and ICM-negative patients, Staphylococcus aureus was the strongest contributor (F=0.99) to the predictive power of the model (Figure 3). In contrast, Cutibacterium acnes was less predictive (F=0.309) and noted to be abundant across both infected and noninfected revision TJA samples. Discussion. This study is the first to utilize predictive modeling algorithms on a large prospective multicenter database in order to transform analytic NGS data into a clinically relevant diagnostic signal. Our collaborative findings suggest the microbial DNA signal identified on NGS may be an independent useful adjunct for the diagnosis of PJI, as well as help identify causative organisms. Further work applying artificial intelligence tools will improve accuracy, predictive power and clinical utility of high-throughput sequencing technology. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Exposure for revision knee requires using the previous incision, employing the “quad snip”, the “Banana Peel”, or the tubercle osteotomy. The “quad snip” is a 45-degree incision of the proximal extensor mechanism that helps protect the distal insertion on the tubercle. The “banana peel,” is my exposure of choice and has been used extensively for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for more than 20 years in my community. We retrospectively reviewed use of this technique in a cohort of 100 consecutive patients who underwent tibial-femoral stemmed revision TKA. The technique involves peeling the patella tendon as a sleeve off the tibia, leaving the extensor mechanism intact with a lateral hinge of soft tissue. A quadriceps “snip” must be done proximally to avoid excessive tension. No patient has ever reported disruption of the extensor mechanism or decreased ability to extend the operative knee. With a mean Knee Society score of 176 (range, 95–200). Post-operative motion was 106 degrees. No patient reported pain over the tibial tubercle. The “banana peel” technique for exposing the knee during the revision TKA is a safe method that can be used along with a proximal quadriceps snip and does not violate the extensor mechanism, maintaining continuity of the knee extensors. As a last resort, tibial tubercle osteotomy as described by Whiteside, is preferred for revising porous coated stemmed tibial components and is repaired with cerclage wire or cables. Keep the osteotomy fragment at least 8–10cm long leaving a lateral soft tissue attachment