Aims. Wrist arthroscopy is a standard procedure in hand surgery for diagnosis and treatment of wrist injuries. Even though not generally recommended for similar procedures, general administration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is still widely used in wrist arthroscopy. Methods. A clinical ambispective dual-centre study was performed to determine whether PAP reduces postoperative infection rates after soft tissue-only wrist arthroscopies. Retrospective and prospective data was collected at two hospitals with departments specialized in hand surgery. During the study period, 464 wrist arthroscopies were performed, of these 178 soft-tissue-only interventions met the study criteria and were included. Signs of postoperative infection and possible adverse drug effects (ADEs) of PAP were monitored. Additionally, risk factors for surgical site infection (SSIs), such as diabetes mellitus and BMI, were obtained. Results. The overall infection rate of SSI was zero. Neither in the PAP group (n = 69) nor in the control group (n = 109) were signs of postoperative infection observed. Observed symptoms of ADEs were three-times higher in the PAP group when compared to the control-group (16.3 vs 5.5%; p = 0.043). No major ADEs were observed, but one in ten patients in the PAP group reported mild to severe intestinal or hypersensitivity symptoms. Conclusion. We demonstrate that the number needed to treat (NNT) with PAP to prevent one postoperative infection in soft-tissue arthroscopies of the wrist is > 109. Conversely, symptoms of ADEs were reported by one out of ten patients given PAP. Considering the high NNT to prevent postoperative infection and the large number of ADEs caused by PAP, we recommend not to use PAP routinely in soft-tissue arthroscopies of the wrist. Subsequent large-scale studies should be conducted to substantiate these results. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(4):219–225

Aims

The primary objective of this study was to compare the postoperative infection rate between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional dressings for closed incisions following soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare rates of adverse wound events and functional scores.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome.

Aims. Hand trauma, consisting of injuries to both the hand and the wrist, are a common injury seen worldwide. The global age-standardized incidence of hand trauma exceeds 179 per 100,000. Hand trauma may require surgical management and therefore result in significant costs to both healthcare systems and society. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common following all surgical interventions, and within hand surgery the risk of SSI is at least 5%. SSI following hand trauma surgery results in significant costs to healthcare systems with estimations of over £450 per patient. The World Health Organization (WHO) have produced international guidelines to help prevent SSIs. However, it is unclear what variability exists in the adherence to these guidelines within hand trauma. The aim is to assess compliance to the WHO global guidelines in prevention of SSI in hand trauma. Methods. This will be an international, multicentre audit comparing antimicrobial practices in hand trauma to the standards outlined by WHO. Through the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network (RSTN), hand surgeons across the globe will be invited to participate in the study. Consultant surgeons/associate specialists managing hand trauma and members of the multidisciplinary team will be identified at participating sites. Teams will be asked to collect data prospectively on a minimum of 20 consecutive patients. The audit will run for eight months. Data collected will include injury details, initial management, hand trauma team management, operation details, postoperative care, and antimicrobial techniques used throughout. Adherence to WHO global guidelines for SSI will be summarized using descriptive statistics across each criteria. Discussion. The Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) will provide an understanding of the current antimicrobial practice in hand trauma surgery. This will then provide a basis to guide further research in the field. The findings of this study will be disseminated via conference presentations and a peer-reviewed publication. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):361–366

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal fusion surgery increase healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality. Routine measures of obesity fail to consider site specific fat distribution. We aimed to assess the association between the spine adipose index and deep surgical site infection and determine a threshold value for spine adipose index that can assist in preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing posterior instrumented lumbar fusion (PILF). A multicentre retrospective case-control study was completed. We reviewed patients who underwent PILF from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018. All patients developing a deep primary incisional or organ-space SSI within 90 days of surgery as per US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were identified. We gathered potential pre-operative and intra-operative deep infection risk factors for each patient. Spine adipose index was measured on pre-operative mid-sagittal cuts of T2 weighted MRI scans. Each measurement was repeated twice by three authors in a blinded fashion, with each series of measurement separated by a period of at least six weeks. Forty-two patients were included in final analysis, with twenty-one cases and twenty-one matched controls. The spine adipose index was significantly greater in patients developing deep SSI (p =0.029), and this relationship was maintained after adjusting for confounders (p=0.046). Risk of developing deep SSI following PILF surgery was increased 2.0-fold when the spine adipose index was ≥0.51. The spine adipose index had excellent (ICC >0.9; p <0.001) inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. The spine adipose index is a novel radiographic measure and an independent risk factor for developing deep SSI, with 0.51 being the ideal threshold value for pre-operative risk stratification in patients undergoing PILF surgery

Many studies report the incidence and prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs) following open fractures; however, there is limited information on the treatment and subsequent outcomes of superficial SSIs in open fracture patients. There is also a lack of clinical studies describing the prognostic factors that are associated with failure of antibiotic treatment (non-operative) for superficial SSI. To address this gap, we used data from the FLOW (Fluid Lavage in Open Fracture Wounds) trial to determine how successful antibiotic treatment was for superficial SSIs and to identify prognostic factors that could be predictive of antibiotic treatment failure. This is a secondary analysis of the FLOW trial dataset. The FLOW trial included 2,445 operatively managed open fracture patients. FLOW participants who had a non-operatively managed superficial SSI diagnosed in the 12 months post-fracture were included in this analysis. Participants were grouped into two categories: 1) participants whose superficial SSI resolved with antibiotics alone and 2) participants whose SSI did not resolve with antibiotics alone (defined as requiring surgical management or SSI being unresolved at final follow-up (12-months post-fracture for the FLOW trial)). Antibiotic treatment success and the date when this occurred was defined by the treating surgeon. A logistic binary regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with superficial SSI antibiotic success. Based on biologic rationale and previous literature, a priori we identified 13 (corresponding to 14 levels) potential factors to be included in the regression model. Superficial SSIs were diagnosed in168 participants within 12 months of their fracture. Of these, 139 (82.7%) had their superficial SSI treated with antibiotics alone. The antibiotic treatment was successful in resolving the superficial SSI in 97 participants (69.8%) and unsuccessful in resolving the SSI in 42 participants (30.2%). We found that superficial SSIs that were diagnosed later in follow-up were associated with failure of treatment with antibiotic alone (Odds ratio 1.05 for every week in diagnosis delay, 95% Confidence Interval 1.004–1.099; p=0.03). Age, sex, fracture severity, fracture pattern, wound size, time from injury to initial surgical irrigation and debridement were not associated with antibiotic treatment failure. Our secondary analysis of prospectively collected FLOW data found antibiotics alone resolved superficial SSIs in 69.8% of patients diagnosed with superficial SSIs. We also found that superficial SSIs that were diagnosed earlier in follow-up were associated with successful treatment with antibiotics alone. This suggests that if superficial SSIs are diagnosed and treated promptly, there is a higher probability that they will resolve with antibiotic treatment

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with significant consequences in orthopaedic surgery, where their presence can lead to ultimate revision of the implant. Furthermore, infections and impaired wound healing can prolong length of hospital stay following orthopaedic surgery, which can place additional financial burdens on healthcare systems. The current analysis was conducted to determine whether the use of the PICO single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) system after orthopaedic surgery reduced the incidence of SSIs and length of hospital stay compared with using conventional dressings. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. English-language studies comparing PICO sNPWT to conventional dressings published from 2011 to August 2018 with ≥10 patients in each treatment arm were included. Reference lists of included studies were searched for further relevant studies. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed effect (I. 2. < 50%) or random effects model (I. 2. ≥ 50%). The SLR identified 6,197 studies, of which 5 relevant studies (607 patients) were included. The odds of an SSI were reduced by 57% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–0.86; p = 0.02) and there was consistency between studies (I. 2. = 0%). Three studies reported on length of hospital stay. The mean difference between patient groups indicated that PICO sNPWT was associated with a 1-day reduction in hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: −0.99; 95% CI: −1.32 to −0.65; p < 0.00001) and there was again consistency between studies (I. 2. = 0%). These results suggest that the use of PICO sNPWT system after closed surgical incisions can reduce the incidence of SSIs and shorten the duration of hospital stay when used in orthopaedic patient populations

Aim. Since surgical site infections (SSIs) remain among the most common complications of orthopedic (trauma) surgery, there has been unwavering attention for potential predictors of a SSI. Specifically in surgical fields with a high complication rate, such as foot/ankle surgery, risk factor identification is of great importance. Recently, some studies have suggested environmental factors such as season to be of influence on the number of SSI. Specifically patients operated on in the summer are reported to have a higher incidence of SSIs, compared to other seasons. The aim of this study is to identify if “seasonality” is a significant predictor for SSI in a cohort of (trauma) surgical foot and ankle procedures. Method. This retrospective cohort study included all patients undergoing trauma related surgery (fracture fixation, arthrodesis, implant removal and tendon repair) of the lower leg, ankle and foot. Procedures were performed at a single Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands between September 2015 until February 2019. Potential risk factors/ confounders for SSI were identified using univariate analysis (Chi-Square/Mann-Whitney U). Procedures were divided in two groups: 1) performed in summer (June, July or August), 2) not performed in summer (September-May). The number of SSIs was compared between the 2 groups, correcting for confounders, using multivariate regression. Results. A total of 605 procedures were included, largely fracture fixation (371, 61.2%). Patients were on average 46 y/o and the majority was male (369, 60.9%). The total number of SSIs was 34 (5.6%). Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (1–2 or 3–4) and open fractures were identified as possible predicting factors of SSI. No difference in SSIs was found between summer and other seasons, neither in univariate analysis (4 (3.2%) vs 30 (6.3%), p=0.271), nor when corrected for confounders. Moreover, in multivariate analysis only an ASA of >2 and an open fracture remained as independent predictors of SSI. Conclusions. No seasonality could be identified in the rate of SSI after trauma surgery of the lower leg, ankle and foot in this cohort. A possible explanation for this lack of effect could be the temperate oceanic climate of the Netherlands. Larger temperature and precipitation differences may also influence the incidence of SSIs. However, previous studies suggesting seasonality in SSIs might also be purely based on coincidence, especially when uncorrected for confounders

Introduction. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures is increasing as the population ages. Wound complications and surgical site infections following surgery to treat periprosthetic fractures are a major source of patient morbidity and health care burden. This study evaluates the efficacy of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) in decreasing wound complications and surgical site infections (SSIs) after periprosthetic fracture surgery about the hip and knee. Methods. An IRB-approved retrospective quality improvement analysis of sixty-five consecutive periprosthetic fracture surgeries performed by four surgeons at a single institution in a fifteen-year period was performed. ciNPT was selectively used on patients in the last 20 months of the study period. Rates of wound complications, surgical site infections, and reoperation were compared with those of a sterile antimicrobial dressing (AMD). Results. AMD was used on 44 patients, while ciNPT was used in 21 patients. Compared with those treated with AMD, patients treated with ciPNT developed fewer wound complications 5% (1/21) vs 25% (11/44) (p = 0.045), deep infections 0% (0/21) vs 20% (9/44) (p = 0.014), and underwent fewer reoperations 5% (1/21) vs 20% (9/44) (p = 0.045). All patients had at least thirty days of follow up. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that ciNPT decreases the incidence of wound complications, deep infections, and reoperations in patients requiring surgical management of periprosthetic fractures about the hip and knee

In the UK, surveillance for surgical site infection is mandatory for orthopaedic surgery. NHS trusts must participate for at least one surveillance period (3 months) every year in at least one of four categories:- hip replacement, knee replacement, hip hemiarthroplasty or open reduction of long bone fractures. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are defined as infections related to a surgical procedure that affects the surgical wound or deeper tissues handled during the procedure. Since mandatory surveillance began in 2004, rates of SSIs have markedly decreased. This is postulated to be secondary to increased early detection. Shorter postoperative stays and underestimation are also likely to be influential factors. We reviewed 150 consecutive lower limb arthroplasties performed at a district general hospital from July to September 2007. All inpatient data were collected as part of the Health Protection Agencies mandatory surveillance. We reviewed this data and notes for recorded evidence of infections or complications for minimum of one year after surgery. We reviewed computer records for recorded microbiological evidence of infection preoperatively and postoperatively. The operations performed during the surveillance period were:- 60 primary total knee replacements (TKRs), 37 primary hip replacements (THRs), 25 hip resurfacings, 15 unicondylar knee replacements, 3 patello-femoral joint replacements, 6 revision TKRs and 4 revision THRs. No SSI’s were detected during the mandatory surveillance period (i.e the inpatient stay, mean 5.61 days, Range 2–44 days). Two SSI’s (1.33%) were detected in our follow up period. Both were superficial wound infections. The first, a 53 year old hip resurfacing patient who was discharged 3 days postoperatively and developed Staphyloccocal infection 5 days later. The other was a 76 year old who underwent THR surgery, was discharged at day 6 and presented on day 12 with Pseudomonas wound infection. Both cases were initially diagnosed and treated successfully with oral antibiotic by GPs. One 61 year old patient who underwent hip resurfacing presented at day 62 with pain. X-rays showed loosening. Deep infection was suspected but hip aspirate, and inflammatory markers were negative. He is being monitored in the outpatient department. Our analysis also revealed that 3 patients had urinary tract infections (Coliforms on MSU) on the day of surgery and none have had postoperative complications. Intraoperative soft tissue samples for one patient who underwent one stage revision TKR grew Haemolytic Streptoccocus but there has been no evidence of postoperative complications. Other complications seen were THR dislocations (n=3) for reasons other than infection, 2 were revised. Persistent pain (n=2), common peroneal nerve palsy (n=1). We conclude that detection of SSI during inpatient stay is almost impossible. Mandatory surveillance seems excessive and a waste of resources

Aims

Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery.

Aims

Single-shot adductor canal block (ACB) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for postoperative analgesia is a common modality. Patients can experience breakthrough pain when the effect of ACB wears off. Local anaesthetic infusion through an intra-articular catheter (IAC) can help manage breakthrough pain after TKA. We hypothesized that combined ACB with ropivacaine infusion through IAC is associated with better pain relief compared to ACB used alone.

Aims

In wound irrigation, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is more efficacious than normal saline (NS) in removing bacteria from a contaminated wound. However, the optimal EDTA concentration remains unknown for different animal wound models.