The intention of suppressive antimicrobial therapy (SAT) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is to minimise symptoms, maintain function and prevent further surgery in patients who cannot undergo further attempts at curative treatment(1). There is little high-quality evidence examining the role and efficacy of SAT for patients with PJI(1,2). The objective of this study was to describe the use of and outcomes after SAT in a large prospective PJI cohort. A pre-planned analysis of a prospective multi-centre cohort of patients with PJI. SAT was defined as antimicrobial therapy for PJI continuing 12-months after diagnosis or where there was an intention for chronic suppressive antibiotics. The primary outcome was treatment failure at 24 months, defined as any of the development of PJI symptoms, further surgery or death from PJI. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Hip and Knee Scores.Aim
Methods
Patients with late acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and treated with surgical debridement have a high failure rate. Previous studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an independent risk factor for treatment failure. We conducted a case-control study to identify predictors for failure in late acute PJI treatment in RA patients. We hypothesize that patients with RA have a higher failure rate compared to controls due to the use of immunosuppressive drugs. Data of an international multicenter retrospective observational study was used. Late acute PJI was defined as a sudden onset of symptoms and signs of a PJI, more than 3 months after implantation. Failure of treatment was defined as persistent signs of infection, relapse with the same or reinfection with a different micro-organism, need for prosthesis removal or death. Cases with RA were matched with cases without RA based on the affected joint. A Cox survival analyses, stratified for RA, was used to calculate hazard ratio's (HR) for failure. Subgroup analyses were used to explore other predictors for treatment failure in RA patients.Aim
Method
Late acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with surgical debridement and implant retention (DAIR) have a high failure rate. The aim of our study was to evaluate treatment outcome in late acute PJIs treated with DAIR versus implant removal. In a large multicenter study, late acute PJIs were retrospectively evaluated. Failure was defined as: PJI related death or the need for prosthesis removal or suppressive antibiotic therapy because of persistent or recurrent signs of infection. Late acute PJI was defined as < 3 weeks of symptoms more than 3 months after the index surgery.Aim
Method
Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is the recommended treatment for all acute prosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, the efficacy of DAIR and identification of risk factors for failure in patients with late acute PJI, is not well described. Patients diagnosed with late acute PJI between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Late acute PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms (≤ 3 weeks) occurring ≥ 3 months after arthroplasty. Failure was defined as: i) the need for implant removal, ii) infection related death, iii) the need for suppressive antibiotic therapy due to persistent signs of infection and/or iv) relapse or reinfection during follow-up.Aim
Method
