Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of operatively treated Lisfranc injuries.

Method: Over a 7-year interval from 1998 to 2005, 184 skeletally mature patients were identified retrospectively with operatively treated Lisfranc injuries. 85 patients had prospectively measured SMFA functional outcomes and satisfaction surveys. The gender was 37 males and 48 females. Mean age was 39 years (range 17–93).

Results: The mechanism was fall (31), MVA (24), crush (15), equestrian (5), or twisting (10). Patients were operatively treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF, 53) or primary arthrodesis (PA, 32). The SMFA reliability for this patient sample was 0.892. The function and bother outcomes were 19.4 and 15.8, respectively. The function (21.5 vs. 16.0, p=.11) and bother (17.5 vs. 13.0, p=.25) outcomes were not significantly different for ORIF vs. PA, respectively. In the ORIF group, HW removal (40 of 53) performed better than HW retention (13 of 53) with outcome bother but not function measures of (14.7 vs. 26.1, p< 0.05).

Conclusion: If performed well, either ORIF or PA technique function well. Patients are more satisfied with the results and appearance of PA over ORIF. HW removal compared to HW retention positively affect bother not function measures. Secondary surgeries negatively affect both bother and function measures. Patients with pain, associated foot or polytrauma injuries function worse.