Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 420 - 420
1 Jul 2010
McConway JHF Wilson R Molloy D O’Brien S Archbold P Beverland D
Full Access

Aim: To develop a flexion jig that would reliably hold the post-op knee in fixed flexion for a defined time period and determine its influence on peri-operative blood loss, transfusion, pain, and complications (specifically nerve palsy)following TKA.

Methods/Results: A previous study in this department showed immediate postoperative flexion to significantly reduce blood loss following TKR. Following this study, time in flexion was increased to 12 hours in an attempt to further reduce blood loss., some patients then developed a painful lower limb nerve palsy. This palsy was caused by pressure from the jig in the popliteal fossa/calf on nerves. The design of the jig was altered to remove pressure from these areas. Because of this design change, we were unsure whether the new jig would have the same blood saving effect, necessitating a new study.

This prospective randomised controlled trial recruited 420 patients into 3 equal groups: extension, 3 & 6 hrs flexion.

This trial found a significant reduction in blood loss(12%, p=0.006) and length of stay(1/2 day, p=0.006) in the 6 hour flexion group, compared the extension group.

There was no significant difference in pain or complication rates (excluding nerve palsy).

2 patients in the 6 hour group had postoperative nerve palsy, however, this palsy was sensory only and markedly different to that found previously. Although the palsy rate in this study is similar(1.4%) to quoted literature rates (1.3%) for TKA, it is difficult to know if the jig was the cause of palsy as the there was a difference between those caused by the old metal jig (painful) and those in this study (sensory loss only).

Conclusion: The results of this study show post-op flexion for 6 hours to significantly reduce perioperative blood loss. Palsy was reduced to match rates as quoted in the literature.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 281 - 281
1 May 2006
Archbold P Mohammed M O’Brien S Molloy D Beverland D
Full Access

Current methods for restoring or preserving limb length following total hip arthroplasty are anatomically inaccurate, as they do not consider acetabular and femoral height independently. In order to address this, we present and evaluate a technique that uses the transverse acetabular ligament to control the vertical height of the acetabular component and a caliper that controls the vertical placement of the femoral component within the femoral canal. Limb lengths were measured in 200 patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty using this technique. Using this method, 94% had a post-operative limb length inequality that was 6 mm or less when compared to the normal side (average +0.38 mm). The maximum measured limb length inequality was ± 8 mm.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 281 - 281
1 May 2006
Archbold P Slomczykowski M Beverland D
Full Access

Background: The positioning of the acetabular component is of critical importance in total hip arthroplasty. Due to the orientation of the acetabulum and limitations of observation imposed at the operative site mal-positioning is common. We believe that by utilising the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and acetabular labrum, we are able to anatomically position our cup. In this study, we evaluate the correlation between placement of the acetabular component by reference to the TAL and the acetabular labrum with the taught safe zones for cup placement.

Method: 7 embalmed hips were studied. Following disarticulation the labrum and TAL were digitised and their plane was calculated. Orientation of cup placement in this plane was calculated from a pre-dissection pelvic CT.

Results: The plane of the labrum/TAL varied between 5–26° of anteversion and 32–59° of inclination. Interob-server differences in acetabular cup placement based on the TAL/labral plane indicate reasonable coherence. Almost all components were inside the documented “safe zone” 0–40° of anteversion and 30–55° of inclination of placement.

Conclusion: The acetabular labrum and TAL form a plane that reflects the documented “safe zones” for acetabular component placement. We feel that this plane allows a surgeon to determine optimal patient specific acetabular component placement, irrespective of patient position.