To quantify the acetabular coverage of the femoral head, Lequesne's vertical-center-anterior edge (VCA) angle is used on the false profile view. Lateral coverage is determined by Wiberg's lateral-center-edge (LCE) angle on an ap pelvic view. The delimitation of the weightbearing area is defined by the end of the subchondral sclerosis line for both views. To our knowledge the exact anatomic location of the points used for measurement on the acetabular rim are not known. Six hips from three cadaver pelvises (3 male and 3 female) were investigated. The anterior and lateral points of interested were identified radiographically using fluoroscopy and marked with 1mm ceramic bullets. Standard false profile views and ap pelvic views in neutral inclination and rotation were taken to check the correct location of the ceramic bullets. A CT of each pelvis was made to locate the ceramic bullets and to define the exact anatomic location of the measurement points on the o'clock position. 6 o‘clock was defined as the midpoint between anteroinferior and the posteroinferior rim edges. Values were normalized for a right hip. The mean clockface location for the VCA was 1:33 (range, 1:15 to 1:40) and for the LCE 0:38 (range, 0:20 to 0:50). The LCEA is slightly anterior to the 12 o'clock position and remains useful to quantify the lateral coverage. Surprisingly, the point used for measuring the VCA is only about 30° (1h) anterior of the point used for measuring the LCEA. Its value for determining anterior cover has to be questioned. The discrepancy to other studies in the literature is because this study identifies and measures the end of the weight bearing zone, and not the border of the bony acetabulum.
The definition of osseous instability in radiographic borderline dysplastic hips is difficult. A reliable radiographic tool that aids decision-making specifically, a tool that might be associated with instability-therefore would be very helpful for this group of patients. The aims of this study were: (1) To compare a new radiographic measurement, which we call the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) index, with the lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI), with respect to intra- and interobserver reliability; (2) to correlate AI, neck-shaft angle, LCEA, iliocapsularis volume, femoral antetorsion, and FEAR index with the surgical treatment received instable and unstable borderline dysplastic hips; and (3) to assess whether the FEAR index is associated clinical instability in borderline dysplastic hips. We defined and validated the FEAR index in 10 standardized radiographs of asymptomatic controls using two blinded independent observers. Interrater and intrarater coefficients were calculated, supplemented by Bland-Altman plots. We compared its reliability with LCEA and AI. We performed a case-control study using standardized radiographs of 39 surgically treated symptomatic borderline radiographically dysplastic hips and 20 age-matched controls with asymptomatic hips (a 2:1 ratio), the latter were patients attending our institution for trauma unrelated to their hips but who had standardized pelvic radiographs between January 1, 2016 and March 1, 2016. Patient demographics were assessed using univariate Wilcoxon two-sample tests. There was no difference in mean age (overall: 31.5 ± 11.8 years [95% CI, 27.7–35.4 years]; stable borderline group: mean, 32.1± 13.3 years [95%CI, 25.5–38.7 years]; unstable borderline group: mean, 31.1 ± 10.7 years [95% CI, 26.2–35.9 years]; p = 0.96) among study groups. Treatment received was either a periacetabular osteotomy (if the hip was unstable) or, for patients with femoroacetabular impingement, either an open or arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement procedure. The association of received treatment categories with the variables AI, neck-shaft angle, LCEA, iliocapsularis volume, femoral antetorsion, and FEAR index were evaluated first using Wilcoxon two-sample tests (two-sided) followed by stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis to identify the potential associated variables in a combined setting. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operator curves were calculated. The primary endpoint was the association between the FEAR index and instability, which we defined as migration of the femoral head either already visible on conventional radiographs or recentering of the head on AP abduction views, a break of Shenton's line, or the appearance of a crescent-shaped accumulation of gadolinium in the posteroinferior joint space at MR arthrography. The FEAR index showed excellent intra- and interobserver reliability, superior to the AI and LCEA. The FEAR index was lower in the stable borderline group (mean, −2.1 ± 8.4; 95% CI, −6.3 to 2.0) compared with the unstable borderline group (mean, 13.3 ± 15.2; 95% CI, 6.2–20.4) (p < 0.001) and had the highest association with treatment received. A FEAR index less than 5° had a 79% probability of correctly assigning hips as stable and unstable, respectively (sensitivity 78%; specificity 80%). A painful hip with a LCEA of 25° or less and FEAR index less than 5° is likely to be stable, and in such a situation, the diagnostic focus might more productively be directed toward femoroacetabular impingement.
The limited field of view with less-invasive hip approaches for total hip arthroplasty can make a reliable cup positioning more challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of cup placement between the traditional transgluteal approach and the anterior approach in a routine setting. We asked if the (1) accuracy, (2) precision, and (3) number of outliers of the prosthetic cup orientation differed between three study groups: the anterior approach in supine position, the anterior approach in lateral decubitus position, and the transgluteal approach in lateral decubitus position.Introduction
Objectives
Obesity is known to influence surgical risk in total hip replacement (THR), with increased Body Mass Index (BMI) leading to elevated risk of complications and poorer outcome scores. Using a multinational trial data of a single implant, we assess the impact of BMI and regional variations on Harris Hip scores (HHS). We assessed BMI in 11 regional centres and associations with HHS at one year. Data were collected from 744 patients prospectively from 11 centres in the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, New Zealand and Netherlands as part of a multicentre outcome trial. All Arthroplasties used RM Pressfit vitamys components (Mathys, Switzerland). Demographic, operative data and HHS were analysed with General Linear Model Anova, Minitab 16 (Minitab Inc, Pennsylvania).Introduction
Method
The lifetime of UHMWPE implants may be limited by wear and oxidative degeneration. Wear produced particles are in general biologically active, and may induce osteolysis. As threshold of PE wear rate below which osteolysis is rarely observed is postulated to be less tahn 0.1 mm per year. Moreover, PE delamination and breakage are consequences of the embrittlement of the PE due to oxidation. Both demonstrate, that improving the clinical behaviour of UHMWPE means reduction of wear particles. The first can be achieved by cross-linking the second by the anti-oxidative stabiliser vitamin E. The highly cross-linked PE vitamys ® used for the isoelastic monobloc cup RM Pressfit (Mathys AG Bettlach, Bettlach, Switzerland) is mixed with 0.1% of synthetic vitamin E and is the first and only highly cross-linked PE used in total hip replacement that meets all requirements for the best grade UHMWPE in yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and elongation at break. With the first implantation of RM Pressfit vitamys® a prospective multicentre study was started. So far 256 cases in 7 clinics from Europe and New Zealand are included. This report presents the first clinical experiences of one Swiss clinic from the multicentre study. Prospective data collection includes Harris Hip score (HHS), patient satisfaction and radiographic analysis. Clinical and radiographic follow-up is done after 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months, and thereafter for long-term results. Standardized documentation of surgery and postoperative course is performed.INTRODUCTION
METHODS AND MATERIAL
establish a method to directly quantify anatomic acetabular version on AP pelvic radiographs and to determine the validity of the radiographic “cross-over-sign” to detect acetabular retroversion.
Femoroacetabular impingement recently was recognized as cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. There are two mechanism of impingement: (1) cam impingement caused by a non-spherical head, and (2) pincer impingement due to acetabular overcover. We hypothesized that both mechanism result in different articular damage patterns. Of 302 analyzed hips only 26 had an isolated cam and 16 an isolated pincer impingement. Cam impingement caused anterosuperior acetabular cartilage damage with a separation between labrum and cartilage. During flexion the cartilage is sheared off the bone by the non-spherical part of the femoral head. In pincer impingement the cartilage damage was located circumferentially, invovolving only a narrow strip along the acetabular rim. During motion the labrum is crushed between the acetabular rim and the femoral neck causing degeneration and ossification of the labrum. Cam and pincer impingement are two basic mechanism that lead to osteoarthrosis of the hip. The articular damage pattern differs substantially. Isolated cam or pincer impingement is rare, in most hips a combination is present. Labral damage indicates ongoing impingement and rarely occurs alone.
Radiodense structures resembling ossicles at the acetabular rim have received multiple names including “Os acetabuli, Os supertilii, Os marginale superius acetabuli, and Os coxae quartum”. Various theories regarding their origin have been postulated. These structures commonly are observed in dysplastic hips and hips suffering from femoro-acetabular impingement and represent fractures of the acetabular rim. In our series we observed acetabular rim fragments in 4.9% of the dysplastic hips and in 6.4% of the hips with femoro-acetabular impingement. Two different pathomechanics are responsible for the occurrence of these rim fragments. In dysplasia the short acetabular roof reduces the amount of available loading surface which leads to an overload on the lateral margin of the acetabulum, propagating the development of a fatigue fracture. However, as in all hips additional cysts were visible, it must be postulated, that cysts have to be present additionally and act as stress risers through which the rim bone eventually will fail. In hips with femoro-acetabular impingement the mode of failure is different. The relative anterior overcover in retroverted hips is subjected to stress during flexion of the hip, which is further increased by the frequent presence of an non-spheric extension of the femoral head as seen in cam impingement. The nonspheric femoral head-neck junction is jammed into the rim area. By repetitive traumatization the anterior rim eventually will fracture. The clinical importance of acetabular rim fractures in the dysplastic hip is readily understood even by an unexperienced observer. However, it has to be considered as a sign that the hip has decompensated and it usually goes with significant articular cartilage damage. Because the radiographic appearance of the hip with femoro-acetabular impingement seems normal at first sight, the mechanism leading to anterior rim fracture may be overlooked. However, recognition and adequate treatment is important to prevent further degeneration of the hip.