Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) is a well recognised complication of cancer and a surgical emergency. We present the results of a prospective audit of process focusing on the timing of intervention for these patients from presentation/diagnosis to surgery. Prospective audit of all patients referred to a tertiary spine unit over 6 months (April –September 2010). All data captured on an excel database.Introduction
Methods
The use of all pedicle screw constructs for the management of spinal deformities has gained widespread popularity. However, the placement of pedicle screws in the deformed spine poses unique challenges for the spinal surgeon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and radiological outcomes of surgery in 124 consecutive patients with spinal deformity. These patients underwent correction of coronal and sagittal imbalance with segmental pedicle screw fixation only. All pedicle screw constructs have been associated with improved correction in all three planes. In patients with severe deformity, such constructs can obviate the need for anterior surgeries, and the higher implant cost is offset by the avoidance of dual anterior and posterior approaches. Pedicle screw fixation enables enhanced correction of spinal deformities, but the technique is still not widely applied for thoracic deformities for fear of neurological complications. This is a retrospective study that was carried out on 124 patients who underwent segmental screw fixation for coronal and sagittal spinal deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complications and outcomes of this technique and also assess the evidence of enhanced correction.Objective
Background
To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes following three different techniques used in the correction of Scheuermann's kyphosis. Twenty three patients with comparable preoperative radiographic and physical variables (age, gender, height, weight, body mass index) underwent correction of thoracic kyphotic deformity using three different surgical methods. Group A (n=8) had combined anterior and posterior fusion with instrumentation using morselised rib graft. Group B (n=7) had combined anterior and posterior fusion with instrumentation using titanium interbody cages. Group C (n=8) had posterior segmental pedicle screw fixation only. All groups had posterior apical multi-level chevron osteotomy and posterior instrumentation extending from T2 to L2/3. Preoperative and postoperative curve morphometry studied on plain radiographs included Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sacral inclination (SI) and lumbar lordosis (LL). Preoperative and postoperative questionnaires including ODI, VAS and SRS-22 were also analysed.Objective
Materials and Methods
In January 2005, NICE published their guidelines on secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. This audit aims to assess our compliance with these in the outpatient setting. The records of all new patients attending fracture clinic in a large teaching hospital, over a one month period, were reviewed. All patients who required screening or treatment for osteoporosis (females greater than 50 years old sustaining a fragility fracture) were reviewed at one year to assess compliance with the guidelines. Of the 454 patients reviewed, 90 females over the age of 50 (19%) were identified. These were further subdivided into females between the age of 50 to 75 years (Group A, n=62) and those over 75 (Group B, n=28). The inclusion criteria was presence of a fragility fracture (Group A, n=30 and Group B, n=15). Group A was investigated with DEXA scans in only 26.7% (n=8). Of these, only six were managed as per NICE guidelines and compliant at one-year. Seven patients in Group B were subsequently treated with medical therapies, but only three were managed as per NICE guidelines and compliant. Therefore of the 45 patients included in the audit, only nine were managed appropriately at one-year (20%). One patient suffered a further fracture – who had been fully compliant with treatment. NICE guidelines have been introduced to help the nation’s health using evidence based criteria. There has been no specific extra funding to enable the setting up of additional pathways and investigations for the targeted population. Even in a busy department where systems were implemented to follow the guidelines, the overall compliance with the pathway is less than a quarter. When new guidance is produced for healthcare, there should be advice, support and funding for their implementation.
