Introduction: Polymodal anaesthesia has become the core approach for the modern anaesthetist. Femoral, sciatic and obturator nerve blockade, individually or in combination, by means of either single shot or continuous infusion, are often used as adjuncts to general anaesthesia in knee arthroplasty.

Methods: We examine the outcome of 2 groups of 100 patients from 2 surgeons and their anaesthetists. All patients received a general anaesthetic. The first group receive a single shot femoral and sciatic nerve block, the second group a standard GA and local infiltration of the surgical field. Post operatively, both groups received identical analgesic regimes and rehabilitation programmes.

Results: Length of stay was prolonged in the nerve blockade group, with 21 of the 100 patients still in hospital on day 6 versus 9 patients in the local infiltration group. An initial advantage in flexion and extension in the nerve blockade group was reversed by day 2 and persisted thereafter. Motor dysfunction was seen to be more prevalent and of longer duration in the nerve blockade group. Muscle groups supplied by the sciatic nerve were 4 times more likely to be involved than those supplied by the femoral nerve. Dysaesthesia in the sciatic nerve dermatomes was 5 times more likely within the nerve blockade group, but less likely in the local infiltration group. No significant difference in rates of VTE. Pain control was superior and less analgesia was required in the nerve blockade group. Fewer patients required urethral catheterisation in the local infiltration group. One heel ulcer occurred in the nerve blockade group. Tourniquet time, significant as a possible contributor to nerve injury, was similar.

Conclusion: Nerve blockade in knee arthroplasty not recommended.

Introduction: The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society recommends that patients with musculoskeletal tumours are treated in specialist centres. Core needle biopsy is an effective method of obtaining tissue diagnosis but a dilemma arises when the material is non-diagnostic. Our aim was to evaluate the management of non-diagnostic biopsies.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed all core needle biopsies performed between 2003 and 2009 in our regional centre. Non-diagnostic biopsies were identified and management reviewed.

Results: 4,520 core needle-biopsies were performed of which 120 (2.6%) were non-diagnostic. Of these 85 (70%) were treated definitively on the basis of existing imaging, 8 (7%) required further imaging before treatment and 27 (23%) had a repeat biopsy.

Of the 27 repeat biopsies a positive histological diagnosis was obtained in 22 patients. The remaining 5 were again non-diagnostic giving a total of 98 patients being treated definitively without a tissue diagnosis.

Of these 98 cases, 39 (40%) were treated non-operatively, 37 (38%) had curettage and 22 (22%) underwent wide excision.

In the curettage group 33 out of 37 patients had a benign tumour on final histology. Four patients turned out to have intermediate/high grade tumours and subsequently underwent wide excision.

In the wide excision group, 17 out of 22 patients had an intermediate/high grade tumour on final histology. Five patients underwent an unnecessarily wide excision of a benign lesion.

None of the patients treated non-operatively turned out to have a tumour.

Conclusion: After non-diagnostic core-needle biopsy, the patient can safely be managed without tissue diagnosis, with low error rate, provided they have been subjected to a multidisciplinary discussion.

Introduction: Initial results for the management of osteochondral defects with both ACI-C and MACI have been encouraging, showing significant clinical improvements. This study set out to report the functional, clinical and histological outcomes in our institution following nine years experience of cartilage-cell transplants.

Aim: Reporting results of nine-year experience of clinical and arthroscopic assessment in the use of ACI and five year experience of MACI in the management of symptomatic, full-thickness chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee.

Method: Following preoperative functional assessments, arthroscopic harvesting of chondrocytes for culture was performed and patients underwent ACI-C or MACI. In ACI-C a covered technique is employed using a porcine-derived type I/III collagen membrane sutured in place; MACI requires cultured autologous chondrocytes to be seeded in a bi-layered type I/III collagen membrane which is glued into position. An arthroscopy was performed between 12 and 24 months post-procedure to assess graft coverage and biopsies taken to determine extent of hyaline, mixed and fibro-cartilage proliferation.

Results: 354 patients underwent either ACI-C (103) or MACI (251) with an average age of 31.3 (15–54). Cincinnati knee rating scores recorded prior to assessment arthroscopy for ACI-C: 58.6 (12 – 92) and MACI: 48.4 (11 – 90) showed improvement at follow up with means of 84.0 for ACI-C, with 78% of patients scoring good or excellent at nine years, and a mean of 82.3% in the MACI group at five years, with 87% of patients recording good or excellent scores; statistically significant improvement was also noted in Bentley Functional score. Biopsies of the transplants taken between 12 and 24 months revealed proliferation of hyaline and mixed cartilage (hyaline and fibro-cartilage) in 47% patients; the later the biopsy was taken post-implantation, it was more likely to reveal hyaline tissue.

Conclusion: Results to date suggest significant clinical and arthroscopic improvement following ACI-C and MACI, with evidence of proliferation of hyaline cartilage at the transplant site and evidence to suggest dynamic improvement in hyaline-nature of cartilage. Limited differences are noted between the outcomes of the two techniques.