Reoperations may be a better way of tracking adverse outcomes than complications. Repeat surgery causes cost to the system, and often indicate failure of the primary procedure resulting in the patient not achieving the expected improvement in pain and function. Understanding the cause of repeat surgery at the primary site may result in design improvements to implants or improvements to fusion techniques resulting in better outcomes in the future. The COFAS group have designed a reoperation classification system. The purpose of this study was to outline the inter and intra observer reliability of this classification scheme.

To verify the inter- and intra-observer reliability of this new coding system, six fellow ship trained practicing foot and ankle Orthopaedic surgeons were asked to classify 62 repeat surgeries from a single surgeons practice. The six surgeons read the operation reports in random order, and reread the reports 2 weeks later in a different order. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and proportions of agreement. The agreement between pairs of readings (915 for inter observer for the first and second read – 61 readings with 15 comparisons, observer 1 with observer 2, observer 1 with observer 3, etc) was determined by seeing how often each observer agreed. This was repeated for the 366 ratings for intra observer readings (61 times 6).

The inter-observer reliability on the first read had a mean intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89. The range for the 15 comparisons was 0.81 to 1.0. Amongst all 1830 paired codings between two observers, 1605 (88%) were in agreement. Across the 61 cases, 45 (74%) were given the same code by all six observers. However, the difference when present was larger with more observers not agreeing. The inter-observer reliability test on the second read had a mean ICC of 0.94, with a range of 0.90. There were 43 (72%) observations that were the same across all six observers. Of all pairs (915 in total) there was agreement in 804 pairs for the first reading (88%) and disagreement in 111 (12%). For the second reading there was agreement in 801 pairs (86%) and disagreement in 114 (14%). The intra-observer reliability averaged an ICC value of 0.92, with a range of 0.86 to 0.98. The observers agreed with their own previous observations 324 times out of 366 paired readings (89% agreement of pairs).

The COFAS classification of reoperations for end stage ankle arthritis was reliable. This scheme potentially could be applied to other areas of Orthopaedic surgery and should replace the Claiden Dindo modifications that do not accurately reflect Orthopaedic outcomes. As complications are hard to define and lack consistent terminology reoperations and resource utilisation (extra clinic visits, extra days in hospital and extra hours of surgery) may be more reliable measures of the negative effects of surgery.

Patients often comment on swelling after foot and ankle surgery. However the relationship between swelling and outcome (pain and function) has not previously been outlined. A recent study by Pinsker and Daniels demonstrated that while swelling was rated as important by patients it was rarely included in outcome scores. The purpose of this paper was to determine the relationship between swelling and outcome after ankle fusion or replacement. A secondary purpose was to determine how this relationship changed in time, how swelling score changed before and after surgery, and determine differences in swelling score between total ankle replacement (TAR), open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA).

The COFAS prospective ankle arthritis database enrolls patients in 4 centers undergoing surgery by one of 6 surgeons since 2002. The MODEMS outcomes package from AAOS was used, with the validated ankle osteoarthritis score (AOS) score being used to assess outcomes in the pain and disability domains. The swelling score was indexed from 1 to 5, 1 being no swelling and 5 being severe swelling. Outcomes were recorded preoperatively and annually up to 2010. Statistical analysis was performed using 95% confidence intervals and correlations being determined using Pearson's correlation and r2 values.

The swelling score was correlated with AOS score with an r2 of 0.13 for postoperative patients. With the swelling score analysed categorically the difference of outcome was significant with a mean AOS score of 15.1 (CI 13.3 to 16.9) for a swelling score of 1, 23 (CI 21.7 to 24.9) for a swelling score of 2, 31 (CI 29.6 to 33.1) for 33.6 (CI 34.9 to 38.8) for 4, and 39 (CI 35.3 to 43.0) for 5. Swelling scores fell outside the 95% confidence intervals for all groups indicating that the AOS outcome of swelling score 5 patients was worse than the 4 group, 4 worse than 3, 3 worse than 2, and 2 worse than 1. Patients with swelling scores of 1 scored 24 points better than those with a swelling score of 5.

Swelling scores were the same preoperatively for total ankle arthroplasty, Arthroscopic and open fusions. However swelling scores were lower for arthroscopic fusions after surgery for all time periods at an average of 2.1 (CI 1.9 to 2.2), compared to total ankle arthroplasty (2.5, CI 2.4 to 2.6) and open ankle fusion (2.5, CI 2.4 to 2.6).

Swelling has a major relationship with outcome. Swelling may be the cause of poorer outcomes for open ankle fusion compared to arthroscopic. Swelling is an independent factor as swelling scores for TAA were higher compared to AAA despite similar outcomes. Arthroscopic surgery reduces the postoperative swelling. Methods to reduce swelling such as compression stockings, elevation, controlling bleeding may result in better outcomes. Minimising the invasiveness of surgery achieves this goal. Patient education about swelling, elevation and compression stockings would assist in these goals.

Purpose

The failure rate of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in rheumatoid patients may be higher than in osteoarthritis patients due to the medications used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and the comorbidities associated with this disease. The purpose of this study was to prospectively look at the intermediate-term outcomes of TAA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and to compare the results to a matched cohort of patients with ankle osteoarthritis undergoing TAA.

Twenty-one symptomatic flat feet from the surgical wait list were compared with twenty-one matched controls. The radiographs were digitized, blinded and the measurements made two occasions by two observers in different order.

On the lateral radiograph the talar to first metatarsal angle reached greatest significance at p< 0.0001, and had an inter and intra observer reliability of 0.83 and 0.75 respectively (r² value). Only three other of the twelve measurements made reached statistical significance. Radiographic assessment of reconstructive procedures should show restoration of the arch of the foot: We recommend using the talar neck to first metatarsal angle on the lateral view as the correct indicator of loss or restoration of an arch.

The purpose of this study was to determine the radiographic measures that differentiate the symptomatic adult flat foot from a normal foot, and determine the reliability of the measurements.

Although many radiographic measures of flat foot are described, only four out of twelve measurements studied were significantly different between symptomatic adult flat foot and normal adults.

Radiographic assessment of reconstructive procedures should show restoration of the arch of the foot: We recommend using the talar neck to first metatarsal angle on the lateral view as the correct indicator of loss or restoration of an arch.

Twenty-one symptomatic flat feet from the surgical wait list were compared with twenty-one matched controls. Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis and posterior tibial tendonitis. All previously described measures of loss of arch were measured on standing AP and lateral radiographs of the foot taken using the same radiographic technique at a single facility. The radiographs were digitized, blinded and the measurements made two occasions by two observers in different order.

On the lateral radiograph the talar to first metatarsal angle reached greatest significance at p< 0.0001, and had an inter and intra observer reliability of 0.83 and 0.75 respectively (r² value). The medial cuniform to 5^th metatarsal height also reached signficance, but had poor intraobserver reliability (r² =0.09). On the AP view, only the talar head uncoverage distance reached significance (p< 0..0001) but had poor inter and intraobserver reliability (r²=0.05 and 0.08).