Torus (Buckle) fractures of distal radius are common in children and form a major workload of any fracture clinic. They are usually stable and do not displace. Recent evidence has shown that these fractures can be safely treated in a futura splint. In UK, many of the hospitals are still treating these patients with full plaster. Bringing back these patients to fracture clinic for plaster removal means more workload and places more financial burden in the NHS. Our study is a completed audit cycle where we successfully implemented treatment with futura splint.

Over a period of 6 months, 25 torus fractures were diagnosed & treated in A/E back slab. Mean age was 8.24 (Range: 3–12 yrs). Most common MOI was fall on outstretched hand. All cases had presented to A/E within 24 hours. 5 were given futura splint at the fracture clinic. 21 cases received full plaster. They were seen back in clinic in 3–4 weeks for plaster removal. After this audit was presented, we started treating these fractures with futura splint

Reauditing 6 months later revealed that of 31 cases, we had successfully treated 28 with Futura splint. 2 were treated with plaster on parent's insistence. The remaining one was treated in plaster as we could not fit a futura splint. There were no problems reported with futura splint.

By definition, torus fractures are stable. The major problem with these fractures lies in the correct diagnosis. We have treated this fracture successfully with futura splint. Recent papers have shown that every patient treated with futura splint saves nearly £53 when compared to plaster treatment. Implementing this treatment has reduced plaster related problems. We hope this audit will help in changing practice in other hospitals in NHS

The posterolateral approach to ankle joint is well suited for ORIF of posterior malleolar fractures. There are no major neurovascular structures endangering this approach other than the sural nerve. The sural nerve is often used as an autologous peripheral nerve graft and provides sensation to the lateral aspect of the foot. Hence every attempt must be made to protect the sural nerve. The aim of this paper is to measure the precise distance of the sural nerve from surrounding soft tissue structures.

This is a retrospective image review study including patients with MRI of their ankle from January 09 - Nov 2010. We indentified 78 MRI scans out of which 64 were deemed eligible for assessment. All measurements were made from Axial T1 slices. Measurements were made from the lateral aspect of the TA to the central of the sural nerve, central of sural nerve to the posterior aspect of the peronei muscles and central of the sural nerve to the posterior aspect of fibula. Data were collected on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and the descriptive statistics calculated.

The key findings of the paper is the safety window for the sural nerve from the lateral border of TA is 7mm, 1.3cm and 2cm at 3 cm above ankle joint, at the ankle joint and at the distal tip of fibula respectively. Similarly the safety window for the nerve from the posterior aspect of fibula is 2cm, 1.6cm, 1.6cm at 3cm above ankle, at the ankle joint and the distal tip of fibula respectively.

Our study demonstrates the close relationship of the nerve in relation to tendoachilles, peronei and fibula in terms of exact measurements. The safety margins established in this study should enable the surgeon in preventing endangerment of the sural nerve encountered in this approach.