Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the highly developed procedure for sever osteoarthritic knee, in which there are two major concepts; Cruciate Retaining design (CR) and Posterior Stabilized design (PS). The femoral roll back movement is enforced with the post-cam mechanism in the PS, however, this structure associates with the complications, i.e. wear and dislocation. The CR has been developed to obtain the knee stability with native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in TKA. However, the preservation of the PCL can limit knee exposure and increase the technical challenge of surgery. We hypothesized that the knee exposure was easily achieved after the PCL was released, however, the PCL was repaired and the posterior stability was re-established after the TKA with time if it was released subperiostealy.

This is a minimum 15 year follow up of a cohort of 58 patients (30 men and 28 women) who underwent 62 non-cemented THR between 1998–2000 (54 unilateral, 4 bilateral), in whom an off-the-shelf “lateral flare” femoral component was implanted. These surgeries were performed by a single surgeon and have been followed continuously by that same surgeon. The mean age at the time of surgery was 60.4 yrs (52–74). There were no exclusions for osteoporosis or type “C” femoral geometry. Although some patients have deceased during these 15 years, there have been no stem failures, revisions or impending stem revisions at the time of follow up or at the time of death in those who have passed. Two patients have undergone revision of their acetabular liner for poly wear. There have been no complaints of thigh pain; and like the results seen in other series employing this stem design, there has been no evidence of bone loss due to stress shielding or subsidence of the femoral component in any of these patients.

This mid-term follow up re-affirms the dynamic tension band model of hip biomechanics, upon which the “lateral flare” design is predicated. This model predicts that the proximal lateral femur can experience compression during the gait cycle and as such can be utilized as an additional base of support upon which the femoral component can rest. Rather than relying upon a traditional “press fit” technique to achieve initial implant stability, a technique which is highly dependent upon femoral geometry, bone quality and may risk fracture on implant seating, the “lateral flare” design permits a gentler, safer and more physiologic means of achieving initial implant stability necessary for osseous integration to occur. This alterantive terchnique has been termed a “rest fit”.

The stem of a femoral component can be helpful in assuring proper implant orientation. However, recent interest in short femoral components with which to better accommodate smaller incisions has resulted in technical challenges to proper implant positioning. In order to avoid component malposition and potential compromise of implant longevity, surgeons may rely upon intra-operative x-rays. However this has major drawbacks: radiation exposure of the OR staff; and accommodation of x-ray equipment without compromise of operating field sterility.

There has been created a simple, precise instrument which will ensure proper implant positioning in varus/valgus and flexion/extension planes without the need of intra-operative x-ray. Its reliability has been confirmed by both cadaveric and clinical studies. It has been demonstrated to be 100% accurate in providing proper short femoral component positioning.

Thromboembolic (TE) events and related wound issues are the most common post-operative complications related to lower extremity total joint arthroplasty. They represent not only significant morbidity but also serious economic consequences. Evolution has selected for thrombus formation as a protection against exsanguination. Trauma is by definition a thrombogenic event. As surgery is an elective trauma, it is understandable that an individual undergoing a surgical procedure will be at increased risk to develop a TE event. However, to treat all patients with an identical prophylaxis denies the reality that the population is not homogeneous. Rather it is a normal distribution with wide variability from hemophyllic to thrombophyllic. As a consequence some patients may be over treated with resultant wound complications, i.e. hematomas, drainage, delaying discharge or worse requiring re-admisssion, re-operation or worst of all a secondary infection of the implanted device.

For this reason we proposed an inexpensive pre-operative screening protocol to more objectively identify an individual's levelof thrombophyllia. Although not exhaustive, it identifies those patients at ends of the curve with either an increased risk of clot or bleeding. It includes: Factor VIII, Factor V (Leyden), Factor C (APCR), Fibrinogen, D-dimer, Prothrombin Gene Mutation, ESR and CRP. This protocol costs less than $200/patient and was found to be 100% predictive of patient risk. Since instituting this protocol we have eliminated re-admission for complications related to overly aggressive TE prophylaxis. It has become an invaluable and intergral part of our pre-, intra- and post-operative protocol for multimodal TE prophylaxis.

Introduction

Pulmonary emboli (PE) after total hip and knee arthroplasties is an uncommon event. However, once it happens, it may results in sudden death. Thus, the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE, is one of the challenging trials for Orthopaedic surgeons. Many procedures have been developed, e.g. early mobilization, compression stocking, intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices, and anticoagulation agents. However, the most effective treatment for prophylaxis against VTE after the arthroplasties remains undecided.

Recently, many low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) agents are developing, and these are strongly effective for anticoagulation. However, these agents sometimes lead to bleeding complications, and result in uncontrolled critical bleeding. We are introducing our protocol with conventional aspirin as VTE prophylaxis after the arithroplasties.

Recent introduction of short femoral implants has produced inconsistent outcomes. There have been reports of early aseptic failure as high as 30% within 2 years of implantation. This is in spite of the fact that these short components are shortened versions of existing successful non-cemented designs. The mode of initial fixation in non-cemented implants has been investigated. It has been demonstrated that long term survivability is dependent upon osseous integration; and that osseous integration requires secure initial implant fixation. Traditional non-cemented implants achieve initial fixation analogous to that of a nail in a piece of wood: friction and displacement (with resultant hoop stress). Initial fixation, of a traditional non-cemented femoral component, is directly proportional to surface area contact between the implant and endosteal bone and/or three point fixation. By reducing stem length, contact area may be significantly reduced, thereby increasing stresses over a smaller area of contact. The result of this is to potentially compromise fixation/implant stability against micromotion occurring in the early post-operative period. These stresses are most poorly resisted in flexion/extension and rotational planes about the long axis of the femur. In addition, force applied in an attempt to achieve initial fixation with a short stem may lead to an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture at the time of implantation.

We propose that there is an alternative mode of initial fixation, a “rest fit”, that may avoid both the risk of femoral fracture as well as provide better initial implant stability. To assure a maximal initial fixation and resistance to post-operative stresses which may compromise initial implant stability and osseous integration, a short implant should have three distinct geometric features: a medial and lateral flare, a flat posterior surface and a proximal trapezoidal cross section. The first will provide stability against subsidence and varus migration, by resting upon the proximal femur. A flat posterior surface will maximize load transmission to the femur in flexon/extension activities; and an asymmetrical proximal cross-section will provide resistance against rotational stresses about the long axis of the femur during activities such as stairclimbing. Together these features have been throproughly evaluated by FEA and in vitro testing. We are reporting on the shoprt term follow up (2.5 years avg.) first 300 short stems which have employed a “rest fit”. There have been no aseptic failures or revisions for mechanical failure of these implants.

Introduction

Femoral neck fracture is a common injury in elderly patients. To restore the activity with an acceptable morbidity and to decrease of mortality, surgical procedures are thought to be superior to conservative treatments. Osteosynthesis with internal fixation for nondisplaced type, and hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement (hip arthroplasties) for displaced type are commonly performed.

Cemented arthroplasty has been preferred over non-cemented arthroplasty because of less postoperative pain, better mobility and excellent initial fixation of the implant, especially for osteoporotic and stove-pipe bones. However, pressurizing bone cement may cause cardiorespiratory and vascular complications, and occasionally death, which has been termed as “bone cement implantation syndrome”. To avoid the occurrence of this syndrome, non-cemented implants have been developed. However, most implants with the press fit concepts and flat wedge taper designs have a risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic fracture.

Recently, we have employed a non-cemented femoral component, which has a lateral expansion to the proximal body as compared to a conventional hip stem. Because of this shape, which is called a “lateral flare”, this stem provides a physiological loading on both the medial and lateral endosteal surfaces of the femur. This is in contrast to conventional hip stem which prioritizes loading on the medial and metaphyseal /dyaphyseal surfaces of the femur. Moreover, the cross section of this stem is trapezoid with the flat posterior surface. This shape provides the stem with rotational stability along the long axis of the femur, and maximizes loading transfer to the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. These mechanical features avoid the need for aggressive impaction of the stem at the time of insertion. It is necessary to only tap gently to achieve the secure initial implant fixation by a “rest fit”. Thus, this technique reduces the risk of fracture.

355 non-cemented MOM arthroplasties, of a single surgeon, with a follow up of 3–16 years (avg. 7.5 years) were retrospectively reviewed for evidence of pseudotumor and aseptic mechanical failure. There were 186 with 28 mm heads, 126 with 34 mm heads, 47 with 38 mm heads, from a single manufacturer.

There were 5 revisions of 38 mm heads for atraumatic painful “metalosis” 4–8 years after implantation (10.7%).

There were 4 revisions of 34 mm heads for post-traumatic instability (dislocation) with secondary metalosis 4–7 years after implantation (3.1%)

There were 2 revisions of 28 mm heads for post-traumatic instability (dislocation) with secondary metalosis 6–12 years after implantation (1.1%).

There were 5 patients, all with 38 mm heads, with asymptomatic “psoas bursae” with elevated serum CR and Co levels (1.0–3.0).

All of the failed THR's had acetabular components with lateral tilt <50 degrees (35–50), and anteversion angles <15 degrees (0–15). 2 of the 34 mm and both 28 mm instabilities were the consequence of injuries sustained in motor vehicle accidents. The remaining 2 instabilities with 34 mm implants were the result of mechanical falls.

Particulate debris, whether secondary to polyethylene, ceramic or metal articulations has been well documented as a cause of synovitis and damage to bony and soft tissues adjacent to a THR. This debris appears to be the result of material wear and mechanical failure with use over time. Unlike native articular cartilage, these materials are incapable of self-lubrication. Therefore THR articulations are dependent upon the penetration of ambient synovial fluid to provide lubrication of the replacement surfaces. This study suggests that increase in head diameter may reduce penetration of synovial fluid between the articulating surfaces of a THR, compromising the lubrication of bearing surfaces; thereby contributing to accelerated wear and premature failure of larger MOM arthroplasties.

Published investigations with custom short stems have reported very encouraging results (Walker, et al, 1). However, off-the-shelf (OTS) versions of shorter length prostheses has not met with the same success.

Several basic questions must be addressed. First, what is the purpose of a stem? Second, can stem length be reduced and if so by how much can this be safely done. Third, what are the effects of stem shortening and are there other design criteria which must take on greater importance in the absence of a stem to protect against implant aseptic failure.

To examine these issues a testing rig was constructed which attempts to simulate the in vivo loading situation of a hip, Fig. 1 (Walker, et, al.). Fresh cadaveric femora were tested with the femora intact and then with femoral components of varying stem length implanted to examine the distribution of stresses within the femur under increasing loads as a function of stem length. This was correlated with observations of prospective DEXA measurement of proximal femoral bone mass and implant migration following THR (Leali, 3). We then initiated a prospective multi-center study of a specific short stem design which included three geometric features to ensure initial implant stability. This report documents that after 2 years, in the first 200 stems implanted, this design has been shown to provide stability against subsidence, flexion/extetnsion and rotational forces. This is consistent with the findings of the in-vitro studies and identical to the previously published clinical results of a similarly designed full length version of this same stem.

Our studies indicated that a stem is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve a well functioning, stable implant. Initial stability can be achieved in the absence of a stem, by a “rest fit,” if adequate design features are incorporated. These studies also demonstrated that simply reducing the length of an existing implant to accommodate changes in surgical techniques may not be a reasonable or safe design change. Such shortened versions of existing stem designs must undergo rigorously in-vitro testing and clinical validation before being released for implantation.

INTRODUCTION:

The purpose of this study was to determine if a short femoral stem (Lima Corporate, Udine, Italy) would result in a strain distribution which mimicked the intact bone better than a traditional length stem, thereby eliminating the potential for stress-shielding.

Recent trends in surgical techniques for THR, i.e. MIS and anterior approaches, have spawned an interest in and possible need for shorter femoral prostheses. Although, early clinical investigations with custom short stems have reported very encouraging results, the transition to off-the-shelf (OTS) versions of shorter length prostheses has not met with the same degree of success. Early reports with OTS devices have documented unacceptably high and significant incidences of implant instability, migration, mechanical/aseptic failure, and technical difficulty in achieving reproducible implantation outcomes. They have highlighted the absolute need for a better understanding of the consequences of changes in implant design as well as for improvements in instrumentation and surgeon training.

Two basic questions must be addressed. First, what is the purpose of a stem? And second, can stem length be reduced and if so by how much can this be safely done. What are the effects of stem shortening and are there other design criteria which must take on greater importance in the absence of a stem to protect against implant failure.

To examine these questions a testing rig was constructed which attempts to simulate the in vivo loading situation of a hip, fig. 1. Fresh cadaveric femora were tested with the femora intact and then with femoral components of varying stem length implanted to examine the distribution of stresses within the femur under increasing loads as a function of stem length.

Our studies indicated that a stem is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve a well functioning, stable implant. However in order to reduce the possibility of mechanical failure a reduced stem or stemless implant absolutely must have three important characteristics to its design. First, it must have sufficient medial/lateral dimension to provide stability against subsidence and varus stress; second it must have a flat posterior surface, parallel and in contact with the posterior endosteal surface of the proximal femur with which to maximize A/P stability against flexion/extension forces (As a consequence of this design feature, appropriate anteversion must be achieved in the neck region of the prosthesis and not by rotation of the implant within the proximal metaphyseal cavity of the femur); and third, the implant must also have a cross-sectional geometry that will stabilize against torsional loading about the long axis of the femur.

Therefore, simply reducing the length of an existing implant to accommodate changes in surgical techniques may not be a reasonable or safe design change. Such shortened versions of existing stem designs must be rigorously tested before being released for general use. The required design parameters outlined above have been clinically validated in custom fabricated implants. They have been shown to reduce aseptic loosening and migration of a short stem femoral implant. This report will provide the clinical review of a multi-center experience with the first 200 off-the-shelf “Lateral Flare” short stem implants.

Introduction

To obtain a better range of motion and to reduce the risk of dislocation, neck and cup anteversion are considered very important. Especially for the reduction of the risk of dislocation, the mutual alignment between neck and cup anteversion (combined anteversion) is often discussed. A surgeon would compare the neck direction to the calf direction with the knee in 90 degrees flexion. When an excessive anteversion was observed, the neck anteversion would be reduced using modular neck system or setting the stem a little twisted inside the canal with the tradeoff of the stem stability. Another choice would be the adjustment of cup alignment. Combined anteversion is defined the summation of cup anteversion in axial plane and stem anteversion in axial plane. But in realty the impingement occurs with 3 dimensional relationships between neck and cup with very complicated geometries. In that meaning, the definition of the angles could be said ambiguous too. The bowing of the femur also makes the relationships more complicated. Upon those backgrounds, we have been performing 3D preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty on every case. In the present study, in vivo position of the stem in each case was determined then the anteversion observed on surgical view and anteversion around femoral mechanical axis are compared using 3D CAD software.

Recent trends in surgical techniques for THR, i.e. MIS and anterior approaches, have spawned an interest in and possible need for shorter femoral prostheses. Although, early clinical investigations with custom short stems have reported very encouraging results, the transition to off-the-shelf (OTS) versions of shorter length prostheses has not met with the same degree of success. Early reports with OTS devices have documented unacceptably high and significant incidences of implant instability, migration, mechanical/aseptic failure, and technical difficulty in achieving reproducible implantation outcomes. They have highlighted the absolute need for a better understanding of the consequences of changes in implant design as well as for improvements in instrumentation and surgeon training.

Two basic questions must be addressed. First, what is the purpose of a stem? And second, can stem length be reduced and if so by how much can this be safely done. What are the effects of stem shortening and are there other design criteria which must take on greater importance in the absence of a stem to protect against implant failure.

To examine these questions a testing rig was constructed which attempts to simulate the in vivo loading situation of a hip, fig. 1. Fresh cadaveric femora were tested with the femora intact and then with femoral components of varying stem length implanted to examine the distribution of stresses within the femur under increasing loads as a function of stem length.

Our studies indicated that a stem is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve a well functioning, stable implant. However in order to reduce the possibility of mechanical failure a reduced stem or stemless implant absolutely must have three important characteristics to its design. First, it must have sufficient medial/lateral dimension to provide stability against subsidence and varus stress; second it must have a flat posterior surface, parallel and in contact with the posterior endosteal surface of the proximal femur with which to maximize A/P stability against flexion/extension forces (As a consequence of this design feature, appropriate anteversion must be achieved in the neck region of the prosthesis and not by rotation of the implant within the proximal metaphyseal cavity of the femur); and third, the implant must also have a cross-sectional geometry that will stabilize against torsional loading about the long axis of the femur.

Therefore, simply reducing the length of an existing implant to accommodate changes in surgical techniques may not be a reasonable or safe design change. Such shortened versions of existing stem designs must be rigorously tested before being released for general use. The required design parameters outlined above have been clinically validated in custom fabricated implants. They have been shown to reduce aseptic loosening and migration of a short stem femoral implant. This report will provide the clinical review of a multi-center experience with the first 150 off-the-shelf “Lateral Flare” short stem implants.

Non-cemented components have traditionally employed several possible features, among them a stem and/or collar, to achieve proper alignment and initial implant stability within the proximal femoral cavity.

The advent of MIS has stimulated an interest in reducing the dimensions of implants, specifically stem length, in order to facilitate introduction and implantation of the component. The consequence of this trend appears to be an increase in early aseptic failure, of some components, due to loosening and migration. Several important questions have arisen.

What are the direction of the deforming forces about a hip during daily activities?

This presentation will discuss the computer modeling, laboratory testing and clinical outcomes of various

component designs; and make suggestions concerning directions for future investigations.

Introduction: For longer lasting and bone conserving cementless stem fixation, stable and physiological proximal load transfer from the stem to the canal should be one of the most essential factors. According to this understanding, we have been developing a custom stem system with lateral flare and an off-the-shelf (OTS) lateral flare stem system was added to the series. On the other hand, dysplastic hips are often understood that they have larger neck shaft angle as well as larger anteversion. In other words they are in the status called “coxa valga.” From this point of view we had been mainly using custom stems for the dysplastic cases before. After off-the-shelf lateral flare stem system; which is designed to have very high proximal fit and fill to normal femora; was added, we have been using 3D preoperative planning system to determine custom or OTS. Then in most of the cases, OTS stem were suitably selected. Our pilot study of virtual insertion of OTS lateral flare stem into 38 dysplastic femora has shown very tight fit in all 38 cases. The reason was analyzed that the excessive anteversion is twist of proximal part over the distal part and the proximal part has almost normal geometry. In the present study, 59 femora were examined by the 3D preoperative planning system how the excessive anteversion effect to the coxa valga status.

Materials and Methods: Fifty-nine femoral geometry data were examined by the 3D preoperative planning system. Thirty-three hip arithritis, 3 RA, 2 metastatic bone tumours, 5 AVN, 1 knee arthritis, 12 injuries, and 3 normal candidates were included. Among them one arthritic Caucasian and one AVN South American were included. The direction of the femoral landmarks; centre of femoral head (CFH), lesser trochanter (LTR), and asperas in 3 levels (just below LTR, upper 1/3, mid femur; A1-3); were assessed as the angle from knee posterior condylar (PC) line. Neck shaft angle of each case was assessed from the view perpendicular to PC line and neck shaft angle form the view perpendicular to CFH and femoral shaft (i.e. actual neck shaft angle).

Results: Average anteversion was 34.4 +/−9.9 degree. CFH and LTR correlated well (i.e. they rotate together). A1, A2, A3 correlated well (i.e. they rotate together). LTR and A1 correlate just a little, LTR and A2 were independent each other. So the twist existed around A1. Neck shaft angle was 138.7+/−6.6 in PC line view and in actual view 130.3+/−4.4. No excessive neck shaft angle was observed in actual view. Even the case that has the largest actual neck shaft angle (140.4), the virtual insertion showed good fit and fill with the lateral flare stem.

Conclusion: In many high anteversion cases, coxa valga is a product of the observation from non perpendicular direction to CFH-shaft plane. Selection or designation of the stem for high anteversion cases should be carefully determined by 3D observation.

Over the last two decades, design modifications in cementless total hip arthoplasty have led to longer lasting implants and an increased success rate. However, there remains limitations to the cementless femoral stem implant. Traditional cementless femoral components require large amounts of bone to be broached prior to stem insertion (1). This leads to a decrease in host bone stock, which can become problematic in a young patient who may eventually require a revision operation during his or her lifetime. Osteopenia, only second to distal stress shielding can lead to aseptic loosening of the implant and stem subsidence, which also accelerates the need for a revision operation (2–4). Recent literature suggests that thigh pain due to distal canal fixation, micro-motion, uneven stress patterns or cortex impingement by the femoral stem is directly correlated to increased stem sizes and often very disabling to a patient (5–8). In this study, we sought to determine whether reducing stem length in the femoral implant would produce more physiologic loading characteristics in the proximal femur and thus eliminate any remaining stress shielding that is present in the current design. We analyzed the surface strains in 13 femurs implanted with

no implants,

Analysis of the resulting surface strains was performed using the photoelastic method. For each femur, intact and with the different stem length components in place, the fringe patterns were compared at the same applied loads. The highest fringe orders observed for all tests were located on the lateral proximal femur and medial proximal femur. The fringes decreased as they approached the neutral axis of bending (posterior and anterior). Distal fringe patterns were more prominent as the stem length increased. The results demonstrate that the stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns seen in a native femur during simulated gait. The presence of a stemless, ultra short and short stem reduced proximal strain and increased distal strain linearly, thereby increasing the potential for stress shielding. The stemless design most closely replicated normal strain patterns observed in a native femur and for this reason has the potential to address the shortcomings of the traditional cementless femoral implant.

One of the most important characteristic of the developmental dysplastic hip (DDH) is high anteversion in femoral neck. Neck-shaft angle is also understood to be higher (i.e. coxa-valga) in DDH femora. From this understanding many DDH intended stems were designed having larger neck shaft angle.

According to the result of our prior study; reported in ISTA 2005 etc.; using computer 3-D virtual surgery of high fit-and-fill lateral flare stem into high anteversion patients, it was revealed that the geometry of proximal femur itself does not have big difference from normal femora but they are only rotated blow lessertrochanter.

It is very important to know what anteversion is, and where anteversion is located, to design a better stem and to decide more proper surgical procedures for DDH cases with high anteversion.

In the present study, the geometry of 57 femora was assessed in detail to reveal the geometry of anteversion and its location in the DDH femora.

Fifty seven CAT scan data with many causes were analyzed. Thirty-two DDH, 3 Rheumatic Arthritis (RA), 2 metastatic bone tumors, 4 avascular necrosis (AVN), 1 knee arthritis, 12 injuries, and 3 normal candidates were included. Whole femoral geometries were obtained from CAT scan DICOM data and transferred to CAD geometry data format. All the following landmarks were measured its direction by the angle from posterior condylar line. The assessed landmarks were

anteversion,

All the directions were measured by the angle from the medial of the femur.

The direction of anteversion and lesser trochanter were well correlated, (R=0.55, Y=0.56X−35) i.e. femoral head and lesser trochanter were rotated together.

The direction of lesser trochanter and aspera in upper 1/6 section had no relation even they are located very close with only several cm distance, (R=−0.03, Y=−0.02X−88) i.e. however the lesser trochanter was rotated, the upper most aspera was located almost at the same direction (−87.5+/−7.58 degree).

The direction of aspera at upper 1/6 and middle femur were strongly correlated. (R=0.63, Y=0.81X-22) i.e. they stay at the same direction.

The results mean that the anteversion is a twist between normal proximal femur (from femoral head and lesser trochanter) and normal distal femur. The twist was located just blow lesser trochanter within several centimeter.

The anteversion has been understood as the abnormal mutual position between femoral neck and femoral shaft. In high anteversion hips the neck shaft angle was also believed to be higher, so several DDH oriented stems have higher neck shaft angle i.e. coxa-valga geometries. It has been believed that the location of the anteversion was around neck part. This study revealed that the deformity was located in the very narrow part just below lesser trochanter. It has been discussed that DDH oriented stems should have fit to different canal geometries, but understanding the biomechanics of abnormal anteversion and its treatment should be more important.

Since 1993, we have been developing preoperative planning system based on CAT scan data. In early period it was used to decide cup diameter and orientation for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). It was done using hemisphere object locating proper position and orientation. According to our progress, we have started using it for custom stem designing, stem selection and stem size planning too since 1995. Since 2001, we have been using it for almost all THA cases. We also have started use it for any case we have question about 3D geometries. Since 2005 we started computer planed 2 staged THA after leg elongation for high riding hips and reported at ISTA 2007 too. Now our policy became that every tiny question we have, we shall analyze and plan preoperatively.

In our population, the incidence of the developmental dysplastic hips is higher. The necks often have bigger anteversion, and less acetabular coverage. So we often use screws for cup fixation. The screw direction allowed in thin shell thickness is limited and less bone coverage makes good cup fixation difficult. With highly defected cases and with revision cases the situation is more difficult.

In the present study, we have developed acetabular 3D preoperative planning method with screw direction, length, and for the cases with defect, cup supporter pre-shaping with models and prediction of the allograft volume.

For the less defect cases, geometries of cup with screw holes were requested to the maker and were provided for us. Screws were attached perpendicular to each screw hole. Screw geometries have marks at every 5mm to plan proper length. The cup was located as much as closer to the original acetabular edge, keeping in the limit to avoid dislocation. Small space above the cup was accepted if anterior and posterior cup edge could be supported by original bone. Then the cup was rotated until we can obtain proper screw fixation.

For the cases with severe defects, we use cup supporters and allografts. Cup supporters are designed to be bent and fit to the pelvis during the surgery. But to shape it a properly; for good coverage and strong support; is very difficult and takes long through the limited window with fatty gloves. And mean while we get more bleeding. The geometries were obtained by CAT scan of the devices. Then proper size was determined as cup size. Chemiwood model was made and proper size supporter was opened and bent preoperatively using the model. It was scanned again and compared to the pelvic geometry again.

Using cluster cups, no dangerous screw was found as long as normal cup orientation was decided and screws were less than 30mm. Posterior screws were often too short then rotated anterior and found to have good fixation. Pre-bending could reduce surgical time remarkably.

As long as we could know, no navigation system can control the cup rotation. But acetabular preoperative planning was very useful and could reduce operative invasion. It could be done easily without using navigation system.

This is a report on the first 100 THR patients treated with an off the shelf version of a novel “Lateral Flare” femoral component. A prior published report has documented the up to 19 year follow up of custom fabricated stems of an identical design concept as being successful in patients < 55 years of age.

HHS, radiographic measure of bone morphology, implant stability and densitometric measure of bone response after THR with an off the shelf version, “Revelation Lateral Flare”, femoral component, confirm excellent bone preservation and implant stability with this design concept. DEXA analysis of a 20 consecutive patient subset of these 100 patients, documented preservation of more than 95% of proximal femoral bone stock in Gruen zone 1 and 102% of total bone stock in Gruen zones 1–7. Implant stability measurement documented < 0.5mm of subsidence in spite of patients being permitted immediate post-operative full weight bearing activity.

These findings support reasonable optimism for expectation of successful long term results being achievable with the use of an off the shelf version of the “Lateral Flare” design concept, in young, high demand patients suffering with early onset osteoarthrosis of the hip.

Uncemented porous coated femoral implants rely on bone in growth to achieve stable, long lasting fixation. The loss of proximal femoral bone mass around hip stems has been traditionally termed ‘stress shielding’ and has been linked to the transfer of loads to the diaphysis and the relative unloading of the proximal femur. Proximally loading devices should then minimize or avert stress shielding altogether. We prospectively evaluated the changes in the periprosthetic bone mass density after insertion of an off-the-shelf non-cemented stem designed to engage both cortices at the metaphyseal level.

A total of 10 total hip arthroplasties with a proximally coated lateral flare device were evaluated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and qualitative radiographic changes 3 weeks after surgery and at 12, 24 and 52 weeks thereafter. The regions of interest (ROI) used in this study corresponded to the zones described by Gruen.

All hips were radiologically stable. The DEXA measurements revealed an overall increase in the BMD at 52 weeks of 4%. Greater gains were observed at or below the lateral flare of the stem in the metaphyseal femur.

The use of an extended proximally loading device proved to have a beneficial effect in the periprosthetic bone mass density due to its geometry and inherent primary stability evidenced by the DEXA and subsidence values.