In recent years, there has been an increase in using self- admistrated questionnaires to accurately assess intervention outcomes in hand surgery to determine the quality of healthcare. This study aims to evaluate whether the Manchester Modified Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (M2DASH) questionnaire is a valid, reliable, responsive, and unbiased outcome measure for Carpal Tunnel syndrome compared to the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Boston questionnaire (BQ), and Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS). 48 patients with CTS confirmed by NCS completed the M2DASH, original DASH, and the BQ, at least twice at different time intervals. The scores obtained from M2DASH were compared and correlated with the DASH, BQ, and NCS to assess validity, reliability, responsiveness, and bias of the questionnaires. Validity analysis for M2DASH showed strong positive correlations with the Original DASH and BQ. No significant correlation was obtained from correlating with NCS. Reliability testing confirmed that the M2DASH is internally consistent and reproducible outcome. Significant results for responsiveness were noted in BQ symptom severity scale only. There was no age, gender, hand dominance, or side affected bias in all three questionnaires.Method
Results
Sensory and motor manifestations in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are well documented, whereas the associated autonomic dysfunction is often overlooked. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that autonomic dysfunction of the CTS hands can be quantified by measuring skin capacitance. Patients with clinical and electrophysiological signs of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited. The patients were also scored based on the Brigham carpal tunnel severity score. Skin capacitance was measured using Corneometer CM825 (C&K Electronic, GmbH). The measurements were taken from the palmar aspect of distal phalanx of the index and little finger of the affected hand. Normal healthy patients with no signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were recruited as controls and skin capacitance was measured in a similar fashion as the CTS group.Background & Objectives
Methods
Haemophilia care has steadily improved over the years and especially so during the last decade. The routine use of prophylactic treatment has undoubtedly resulted in a significant improvement in the life-style, quality of life and life expectancy of these patients. However despite our best efforts there is still a group of young adults who have a severe degree of knee joint destruction as a result of repeated articular bleeding episodes during their early years. The knee is the most common joint affected in haemophilia (50%). The repeated articular bleeding episodes during the patients' early years leads to the onset of pain and significant functional disability at a time when they require the best possible quality of life. The major objective of total joint replacement is to reduce the level of pain in the affected joint and, in addition, a significant reduction in the frequency and number of joint bleeds, which improves both function and mobility. The results of 60 primary total knee replacements performed in 42 patients with severe haemophilia between 1983 and 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Functional results were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score both pre- and post-operatively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was used to calculate prosthetic survival. The mean age of patients was 43.35 (range 25-70yrs). The overall prevalence of infection was less than 2%. The HSS clinical score was excellent or good for 95% of the knees. We believe that total joint replacement is a safe and effective procedure in the management of haemophilic joint arthropathy. The latest techniques using continuous infusion and recombinant factor replacement have gone a long way to reducing the complications rate and to achieving results that match those of the general population.
Haemophilia care has steadily improved over the years and especially so during the last decade. The routine use of prophylactic treatment has undoubtedly resulted in a significant improvement in the life-style, quality of life and life expectancy of these patients, and bodes well for the future. The knee is the most common joint affected in patients with severe haemophilia (approx 50%) and despite best efforts there is still a group of young adults who have a severe degree of knee joint destruction as a result of repeated articular bleeding episodes during their early years. The indications for operation are primarily disabling pain that is unresponsive to medical treatment. Deformity and poor functional range of motion, particularly a severe flexion contracture of the knee, are relative indications and may in themselves justify joint replacement. Equally joint contractures and flexion deformity pose various surgical challenges for the surgeon. The introduction of continuous replacement clotting factor has facilitated the operation and in our experience has reduced the complications of TKR. We have found that it permits earlier rehabilitation and in our present series the outcome in this group of patients almost comparable to TKR performed in the general population.
Patients with severe haemophilia have a tendency towards recurrent haemarthroses resulting in chronic synovitis and leading to end stage haemophilic arthropathy. From 1997 to 2001 five patients underwent sequential bilateral total knee replacement. We compared these patients with 13 haemophilic patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee replacement. One senior surgeon performed all surgery using an identical prosthesis under similar surgical and haematological conditions. We reviewed information regarding pre-operative medical condition, antibiotic prophylaxis, blood replacement requirement and tourniquet time were all recorded. The rate of post-operative complications and economic evaluation between the two cohorts was calculated. Functional results were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee scoring system both pre and postoperatively. We have shown that complication rates following bilateral and unilateral total knee replacements are comparable and that there are no differences in the functional outcomes or complication rates between the two groups. Furthermore, we found that bilateral procedures were advantageous with respect to total rehabilitation times, length of in-patient stay clotting factor usage and cost efficiency.