Identification of the paediatric orthopaedic patient at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) can allow a targeted approach to thromboprophylaxis. There is currently no national consensus on the correct method of risk assessment in this patient group. The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital has developed a guideline using the evidence available to allow stratification of risk for the paediatric orthopaedic patient.

A list of departments offering specialist paediatric orthopaedic surgery was obtained from the member list of the British Society of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons (BSCOS). These hospitals were contacted via telephone interview to determine if they have a specific guideline or risk assessment proforma for paediatric VTE risk.

A total of 74 hospitals were identified with a specialist paediatric orthopaedic practice in the United Kingdom. A response rate was gained from 100% of these hospitals. Only 3/74 of these hospitals had a guideline or protocol in place for the formal assessment of VTE risk in the paediatric patient (Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore; Sheffield Children's Hospital; Barts & the London NHS Trust). All three hospitals were able to provide details of their guideline. Both the RNOH and Barts & the London commented that their guideline was based on that of the Sheffield group, with adaptations for their own requirements.

The majority of hospitals in the UK with a paediatric orthopaedic interest do not have guidance available for the management of VTE risk. Presented here is the outcome of using the limited evidence available, in combination with expert opinion, to develop a guideline suitable for the requirements of a paediatric unit in an orthopaedic hospital. This may be of benefit to other units producing their own guidelines, producing thought and discussion as to the specific requirements of paediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic procedures.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in teenagers is uncommon and previously associated with poor survival rates. However it is sometimes the only option remaining to relieve pain and improve function in patients with advanced hip disease. We report on the clinical and radiological outcomes of THA in teenage patients. Medical records and radiographs of all consecutive teenage patients undergoing THA at a tertiary referral centre between 2006–2011 were reviewed. Mean follow-up was 3.4 years (range 0.6–6.8) with 9 patients having at least 5 years follow-up. Post-operative Harris hip, Oxford hip (OHS) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores were recorded. 51 THAs were performed in 43 patients (21 male, 22 female) with a mean age of 17 years (range 12–19). The 5 most common indications were slipped upper femoral epiphysis osteonecrosis 15 (29.4%), developmental hip dysplasia osteonecrosis 5 (9.8%), multiple/spondylo-epiphyseal dysplasia 5 (9.8%), chemotherapy-induced osteonecrosis 4 (7.8%) and idiopathic osteonecrosis 4 (8.2%). 46 (90%) were uncemented THAs and 5 (10%) were reverse hybrid THAs with 7 computer assisted design/manufacture (CADCAM) femoral implants. Articular bearings were ceramic/ceramic in 40 (78.4%), metal/metal 6 (11.8%), metal/polyethylene 3 (5.9%) and ceramic/polyethylene 2 (3.9%). The survival rate was 96% with 2 acute head revisions for 1 sciatic nerve palsy and 1 instability. Other complications (8.2%) included 1 dislocation, 1 sciatic nerve palsy that resolved, 1 surgical site infection and 1 unexplained pain. At latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score was 90 (68–99), OHS was 42 (32–48) and UCLA activity score was 6 (4–9). Radiological analysis showed 2 patients with lucent lines around the acetabular component, but no signs of osteolysis or wear. As one of the largest studies on teenagers undergoing THA, we report good clinical and radiological outcomes at short to intermediate term follow-up.

The results for autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee are encouraging. At present, two techniques have been described to retain the chondrocyte suspension within the defect. The first involves using a periosteal flap harvested from the distal femur and the second involves using a type I/III collagen membrane. To the authors' knowledge there are no comparative studies of these two techniques in the current literature.

A total of 68 patients with a mean age of 30.52 years (range 15 to 52 years) with symptomatic articular cartilage defects were randomised to have either ACI with a periosteal cover (33 patients) or ACI with a type I/III collagen cover (35 patients). The mean defect size was 4.54 cm² (range 1 to 12 cm²). All patients were followed up at 24 months.

A functional assessment using the Modified Cincinnati score showed that 74% of patients had a good or excellent result following the ACI with collagen cover compared with 67% after the ACI with periosteum cover at 2 years (p>0.05). Arthroscopy at 1 year also demonstrated similar results for both techniques. However, 36.4% of the periosteum covered grafts required shaving for hypertrophy compared with 1 patient for the collagen covered technique.

This prospective, randomised study has shown no statistical difference between the clinical outcome of ACI with a periosteal cover versus ACI with a collagen cover at 2 years. A significant number of patients who had the ACI with periosteum technique required shaving of a hypertrophied graft within the first year of surgery. We conclude that there is no advantage in using periosteum as a cover for retaining the chondrocytes within an osteochondral defect; as a result we advocate the use of an alternative cover such as a porcine-derived, type I/III collagen membrane.

Introduction: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is a technique described for treating symptomatic osteochondral defects in the knee. It is contra-indicated, however, in a joint rendered unstable by a ruptured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We present our early experience of combined ACL and ACI repair.

Methods: Patients underwent arthroscopic examination and cartilage harvesting of the knee. Chondrocytes were then cultured in plasma and a second operation was undertaken approximately four weeks later to repair the ruptured ACL with hamstring graft and to implant the chondrocytes via formal arthrotomy. Patients then underwent a graduated rehabilitation program and were reviewed at 6 and 12 months. Functional measurements were made using the Bentley functional scale and the modified Cincinnati rating system, with pain measured on a visual analogue scale. All patients also underwent formal clinical examination at each review.

Results: 4 out of the 5 patients reported an improvement in pain as measured on visual analogue scale, with 1 patient reporting no difference. 4 patients had stable knees as determined by negative anterior draw, negative Lachman’s test and negative pivot shift test; one patient showed improvement, but remained pivot shift positive. Improvements in Bentley scores were noted in 3 patients. Cincinnati scores were markedly improved in 3 patients and slightly improved in the remaining 2 patients. The only operative complications were a traction neuropraxia to the saphenous nerve of one patient requiring no treatment and a manipulation under anaesthesia for poor mobilisation in another patient, which was successful in improving range of movement. A further patient required arthroscopic trimming of the cartilage graft which had overgrown; this was also successful.

Conclusion: Symptomatic cartilage defects and ACL deficiency may co-exist in many patients and represent a treatment challenge. Our early results suggest that a combined ACL and ACI repair is a viable option in this group of patients and should reduce the anaesthetic and operative risks of a two-stage repair. More patients and longer follow up will be required to fully assess this technique.

Background: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) was introduced over 15 years ago as a treatment for full-thickness chondral defects in the knee. Current understanding of ACI graft morphology and maturation in humans is limited. The aims of this study were determine the incidence of hyaline-like repair following ACI, and to clarify the relationship between repair morphology and clinical outcome.

Methods: A retrospective review of 194 ACI graft biopsies from 180 patients, and their clinical outcome was conducted. 154 Biopsies were performed 1 year after implantation and 40 biopsies were performed at 2 years. Three techniques of ACI implantation were used; Collagen covered ACI (ACI-C), periosteum covered ACI (ACI-P) and Matrix-Induced ACI (MACI).

Results: At 1 year, hyaline repair tissue was found in 48 (53%) ACI-C grafts, 7 (44%) ACI-P grafts, and 12 (36%) MACI grafts. The frequency of hyaline tissue found in biopsies performed at 2 years (84%) was significantly higher than those performed at 1 year (48.6%), p=0.0001, suggesting that grafts continue to remodel after the first year post implantation.

Clinical outcomes during the first two postoperative years did not vary according to repair morphology type, though hyaline repair was associated with better clinical outcomes beyond 2 years; At 1 year, good to excellent clinical scores were observed in 29 (78.4%) patients with hyaline-like repair, 23 (76.7%) patients with fibrohyaline repair, and 54 (74.0%) patients with fibrocartilage repair. By years 3 and 4 post-implantation, clinical scores further improved in patients with hyaline-like repair yet declined in those with fibrocartilage and fibrohyaline. The difference was significant at 3 years though not at 4 due to the small number of cases.

Conclusions: Achieving hyaline-like repair is critical to the longevity of cartilage repair. The finding of hyaline-like cartilage or fibrohyaline cartilage in 31 of 37 biopsies (84%) performed after 2 years is therefore encouraging and supports further use of the ACI technique.

Background: Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) is widely used as a treatment for symptomatic chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee. Variations of the original periosteum cover technique include the use of porcine-derived type I/III collagen as a cover (ACI-C), and the use of a collagen bilayer seeded with chondrocytes (MACI).

Aim: To determine whether differences in clinical, arthroscopic and histological outcomes at 1 year exist between ACI-C and MACI techniques.

Methods: We have performed a prospective randomised comparison of ACI-C versus MACI for the treatment of symptomatic chondral defects of the knee on 91 patients of whom 44 received ACI-C and 47 received MACI grafts.

Results: Both treatments resulted in improvements of clinical scores after 1 year. Mean modified Cincinnati knee scores increased by 17.5 in the ACI-C group and 19.6 in the MACI group (p> 0.05). Arthroscopic assessments performed after 1 year demonstrated good to excellent ICRS graft repair scores in 79% of ACI-C grafts and 67% of MACI grafts. Hyaline-like or hyaline-like cartilage with fibrocartilage was found in the biopsies of 43% of ACI-C grafts and 36% of MACI grafts after 1 year. The rate of graft hypertrophy was 9% in the ACI-C group and 6% in the MACI group. The frequency of re-operation was 9% in each group.

Conclusions: We conclude that clinical, arthroscopic and histological outcomes are comparable for both ACI-C and MACI techniques. While the MACI technique is technically attractive, further long-term studies are required before widespread adoption of this new technique.

Introduction and Aims: ACI (autologous chondrocyte implantation) using a periosteum cover was developed by Peterson et al. Recently, the technique has been developed using a Type I/Type III collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide). A second technique MACI (matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation) has evolved using a membrane with chondrocytes seeded onto its surface. Aim is to review the one and two-year results of the first 159 patients at a single regional centre.

Method: The two-stage procedure was performed with a standardised, progressive rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed clinically at three, six, nine, 12 and 24 months (pain score, Modified Cincinnati, Bentley), and arthroscopically at 12 and 24 months.

Results: 159 patients have been assessed at one year and 101 patients at two years. Of those patients reviewed at one year, 110 patients had the ACI repair with Chondro-Gide, 31 patients had the ACI repair with periosteum and 18 patients had the MACI repair. Sixty-nine percent had good or excellent results at one year and 60% at two years.

These figures represent the early results of this study performed at this unit.

Conclusion: We propose that the ACI technique is valuable for selected patients with Chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee even with large and multiple defects in the articular cartilage.