Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 23 - 23
1 Nov 2022
Jha A Jayaram J Carter J Siney P James J Hemmady M
Full Access

Abstract

Cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the younger patient has historically been associated with higher wear and revision rates. We carried out a retrospective study of a prospectively collected database of patients at Wrightington hospital undergoing cemented THA under 55 years of age to determine acetabular wear and revision rates.

Between August 2005 and December 2021 a cohort of 110 patients, 56 males and 54 females, underwent Cemented Total Hip Replacement through a posterior approach. Mean age at operation was 50yrs (35–55). The mean follow up was 6 years 9 months (0–16 years). 3 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 107 patients, Conventional and cross lined polyethylene were used in 54 and 53 patients respectively. Ceramic heads were used in 102 patients. 22.225mm and 28mm heads were used in 60 and 47 patients respectively. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Merle d'Aubigne and Postel scores which showed significant functional improvement. Linear wear was measured on plain radiographs using TRAUMA CAD and cup loosening was assessed by classification of Hodgkinson et al.

No cases were revised during the observed follow up period. The mean wear rate in conventional and crosslinked polyethylene cups were 2.31mm (0.1–4.6) and 1.02mm (0.1–2.6) respectively.

Cemented THA with both conventional and crosslinked polyethylene provides excellent survival rates in adults under the age of 55 years and crosslinked polyethylene may further improve these results due to improved wear rates.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Jun 2016
Drampalos E Fadulelmola A Hemmady M
Full Access

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene aims to reconstitute the bone stock in hip revision. This is an effective but expensive, resource intensive and time consuming technique. Most surgeons remove the articular cartilage from the femoral head allograft. The aim of this study is to reproduce the results using the whole femoral head with the articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting.

38 acetabular revisions using impacted morselised bone graft retaining the articular cartilage and a cemented cup were studied retrospectively. The operations were performed by the senior author in Wrightington Hospital, UK with a posterior hip approach. The mean follow up was 4.1 years (range, 1–10 years). Clinical and radiological assessment was made using the Oxford hip score, Hodgkinson's criteria (1988) for socket loosening and the Gie classification (1993) for evaluation of allograft incorporation.

Thirty-six (94.7%) sockets were considered radiologically stable (type 0, 1, 2 demarcations) and two (5.3%) sockets were radiologically loose (type 3 demarcations) but there was no socket migration. Twenty-one (55.3%) cases showed good trabecular remodeling (grade 3). Fourteen (36.8 %) cases showed trabecular remodeling (grade 2). Only three (7.9%) cases showed poor allograft incorporation (grade 1). Mean pre-operative hip score was 41 and post-operative hip score was 21. There was one (2.6%) wound infection treated with oral antibiotics and one (2.6%) periprosthetic femoral fracture treated with cables. Furthermore, there was one (2.6%) case of pulmonary embolism and three (7.89%) cases of asymptomatic heterotopic ossification. One year mortality rate was 2.6% (one case) from heart failure but not associated with the surgery. There have been no socket re-revisions (100% survival) at an average of 4 years.

At a mean follow up of 4 years, results with the aforementioned technique are comparable to other major studies. Compared to the 40% of minimal loss in obtaining pure cancellous graft less than 10% of initial graft mass is lost without removing the articular cartilage. Particularly when the supply of allograft and operative time are limited retaining the articular cartilage of the femoral head is a safe and effective alternative to be considered.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 398 - 398
1 Jul 2010
Rao M Phillips S Hemmady M Hodgkinson J
Full Access

Introduction: Trochanteric osteotomy provides excellent exposure to perform hip replacement surgery. In the UK, 5.9% of primary hip replacements are performed using an osteotomy. Trochanteric non union is one of the complications of this approach. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of release of posterior trochanteric soft tissue release on the incidence of trochanteric non-union.

Method: We present the results of 100 patients who underwent primary cemented total hip replacement at our centre using the biplanar, intracapsular osteotomy. Group A (50 patients) had received a posterior trochanteric soft tissue release as part of the approach and Group B (50 patients) had not. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically.

Results: In group A the trochanteric non union rate was 12% and in group B 2% (p< 0.05). According to the Hodgkinson’s classification of trochaneric non-union, all the non-unions in group A were grade 3 (> 1.5 cm migration) and group B was grade 2 (< 1.5cm migration).

Discussion: The two different techniques were examined on cadaveric specimens and it was noted that the obturator externus tendon was consistently cut as a part of the posterior soft tissue release. We conclude that this important structure should not be released as part of this approach to hip replacement. Obturator externus is an important adductor of the trochanter and preserving it decreases the incidence of trochanteric non-union.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 402 - 402
1 Sep 2009
Subramanian S Jain D Sreekumar R Box U Hemmady M Hodgkinson J
Full Access

Introduction: Extensive bone loss associated with revision hip surgery is a significant orthopaedic challenge. Acetabular reconstruction with the use of impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique in revision situations with cavitatory acetabular bone defects. Slooff et al. (1996) reported the use of cancellous graft alone. Brewster et al. (1999) morselised the whole femoral head after removal of articular cartilage. This paper asks, is it really necessary to use pure cancellous graft?

Methods: 42 acetabular revisions using impacted morselised bone graft without removal of articular cartilage and a cemented cup were studied retrospectively. The mean follow up was 2.6 years (1–5yrs). Clinical and radiographic assessment was made using the Oxford Hip score, Hodgkinson’s criteria (1988) for socket loosening and Gie classification (1993) for evaluation of allograft consolidation and remodelling.

Results: 40(95%) sockets were considered radiologically stable (Type 0, 1, 2 demarcations). 2(5%) sockets were radiologically loose (Type 3 demarcation). There was no socket migration in our series. 27(64%) cases showed good trabecular remodelling (grade 3). 12(29%) cases showed trabecular incorporation (grade 2). Only 3(7%) cases showed poor allograft incorporation (grade 1). Average pre operative Oxford hip score was 41 and postoperative hip score was 27. There have been no socket re-revisions (100% survival) at an average of 2.6 years.

Conclusion: Early radiological and clinical survival results with retaining articular cartilage of femoral head allograft are similar and comparable to other major studies for acetabular impaction bone grafting in revisions. Minimal loss of allograft mass is 40% in obtaining pure cancellous graft. When there is a limited supply and demand of allograft, saving up to 40 % of the material is a valuable and cost effective use of scarce resources.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 243 - 243
1 May 2006
Mehra A Hemmady M Hodgkinson J
Full Access

Introduction: Trans-trochanteric approach to the hip joint has become less popular in recent years mainly due to problems associated with trochanteric non-union. Although reported incidence of dislocation is low when the trochanter unites following the trans-trochanteric approach, the radiographic appearance of an ununited high flying trochanter with broken wires is distressing for patient and surgeon.

Aim & objective: The aim of our study was to determine if trochanteric non-union was associated with a higher incidence of revision for mechanical failure.

Method: The case notes and radiographs of 371 patients operated between 1979 and 1989 by two senior surgeons were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 16.7 years (Range 15–25 years).

Results: 19.6% (66/336) patients with the trochanter united and 20% (7/35) with trochanteric non-union had been revised at the latest follow up. The difference was not found to be statistically significant (p value > 0.1, Odds Ratio 1.02).

Conclusion: This study showed that trochanteric non-union following primary total hip replacement did not increase the incidence of revision surgery over a period of 25 years.