Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 150 - 163
1 Mar 2021
Flett L Adamson J Barron E Brealey S Corbacho B Costa ML Gedney G Giotakis N Hewitt C Hugill-Jones J Hukins D Keding A McDaid C Mitchell A Northgraves M O'Carroll G Parker A Scantlebury A Stobbart L Torgerson D Turner E Welch C Sharma H

Aims

A pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 101 - 101
1 Apr 2012
Moghadas P Hukins D Shepherd D Mahomed A
Full Access

School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

This study investigated the effects on friction of changing the dimensions of a ball-and-socket Total Disc Arthroplasty (TDA).

A generic ball-and-socket model was designed and manufactured based on the dimensions and geometry of a metal-on-metal Maverick (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) device. Keeping the radial clearance similar to the Maverick, the ball and socket dimensions varied between 10 to 16 mm and 10.015 to 16.015 mm, respectively, in order to enable the comparison between different dimensions. The implants were made out of Cobalt Chrome Molybdenum alloy, with a surface roughness of 0.05 μm.

A Bose spine simulator (Bose Corporation, ElectroForce Systems Group, Minnesota, USA) was used to apply an axial compressive force to the TDA. Axial rotation of ±2° was then applied at various frequencies and the resulting frictional torque measured. The tests were performed under an axial load of 50, 600 and 1200 N and frequencies of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 Hz, for four different samples of radii 10, 12, 14 and 16 mm (48 combinations in total).

The results showed variation of frictional torque in different frequencies for all four samples under constant axial load. It was observed that the frictional torque had the lowest value for the implant with ball radius of 16mm. It might be concluded that the implant with larger ball radius may create less friction and hence offer a longer life.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 222 - 222
1 Jul 2008
Dang L Wardlaw D Hukins D
Full Access

Introduction: This abstract describes the development of an effective procedure for removing as much nucleus as possible from an intervertebral disc with minimal disruption to the annulus. The procedure was developed on cadaveric sheep discs which are well established as a model for human discs in studies of this kind. The purpose of the study was to develop a method for removing the nucleus as part of a laboratory study of nucleus replacement; however, it is also intended to guide the development of procedures for the removal of residual nucleus when indicated in surgical procedures that involve replacing the nucleus with synthetic materials.

Methods: All procedures were performed via a 3 mm trocar. Four procedures were compared: (I) unilateral approach using rongeurs alone, (II) bilateral approach using rongeurs alone, (III) unilateral approach using rongeurs followed by chymopapain and (IV) bilateral approach using rongeurs followed by chymopapain. Chymopapain was administered as a solution (30 units in 0.1 cm3 de-ionised water) to a disc at 37oC. For each procedure (I–IV) 14 discs were used.

Results: The percentages of nucleus removed were: (I) 34 ± 2%, (II) 41 ± 2%, (III) 52 ± 3% and (IV) 75 ± 8%; ANOVA showed a significant differences between the four sets of results (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Significantly more nucleus is removed using a bilateral than a unilateral approach; significantly more nucleus is removed if chymopapain is used in addition to rongeurs.