Extensive bone defects, caused by severe trauma or resection of large bone tumors, are difficult to treat. Regenerative medicine, including stem cell transplantation, may provide a novel solution for these intractable problems and improve the quality of life in affected patients. Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) have been extensively studied as cell sources for regenerative medicine due to their excellent proliferative capacity and the ability to obtain a large number of cells with minimal donor morbidity. However, the osteogenic potential of ASCs is lower than that of bone marrow-derived stromal/stem cells. To address this disadvantage, our group has employed various methods to enhance osteogenic differentiation of ASCs, including factors such as bone morphogenetic protein or Vitamin D, coculture with bone marrow stem cells, VEGF transfection, and gene transfer of Runx-2 and osterix. Recently, we mined a marker that can predict the osteogenic potential of ASC clones and also investigated the usefulness of the molecule as the enhancer of osteogenic differentiation of ASCs as well as its mechanism of action. Through RNA-seq gene analysis, we discovered that GSTT1 was the most distinguished gene marker between highly osteogenic and poorly osteogenic ASC clones. Knockdown of GSTT1 in high osteogenic ASCs by siGSTT1 treatment reduced mineralized matrix formation while GSTT1 overexpression by GSTT1 transfection or GSTT1 recombinant protein treatment enhanced osteogenic differentiation of low osteogenic ASCs. Metabolomic analysis confirmed significant changes of metabolites related to bone differentiation in ASCs transfected with GSTT1. A high total antioxidant capacity, low levels of cellular reactive oxygen species and increased GSH/GSSG ratios were also detected in GSTT1- transfected ASCs. GSTT1 can be a useful marker to screen the highly osteogenic ASC clones and also a therapeutic factor to enhance the osteogenic differentiation of poorly osteogenic ASC clones.
We found that adipose stem cells are poorly differentiated into bone and that their ability to differentiate into bone varies from cell line to cell line. The osteogenic differentiation ability of the adipose stem cell lines was distinguished through Alzarin Red Staining, and the cell lines that performed well and those that did not were subjected to RNA-seq analysis. The selected gene GSTT1 (glutathione S-transferase theta-1) gene is a member of a protein superfamily that catalyzes the conjugation of reduced glutathione to a variety of hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds. The purpose of this study is to treat avascular necrosis and bone defect by improving bone regeneration with adipose stem cells introduced with a new GSTT1 gene related to osteogenic differentiation of adipose stem cells. In addition, the GSTT1 gene has the potential as a genetic marker that can select a specific cell line in the development of an adipose stem cell bone regeneration drug. Total RNA was extracted from each sample using the TRIzol reagent. Its concentration and purity were determined based on A260 and A260/A280, respectively, using a spectrophotometer. RNA sequencing library of each sample was prepared using a TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit. RNA-seq experiments were performed for hADSCs. Cells were transfected with either GSTT1 at 100 nM or siControl (scramble control) by electroporation using a 1050 pulse voltage for 30 ms with 2 pulses using a 10 μl pipette tip. The purpose of this study is to discover genetic markers that can promote osteogenic differentiation of adipose stem cells (hADSCs) through mRNA-seq gene analysis. The selected GSTT1 gene was found to be associated with the enhancement of osteogenic differentiation of adipose stem cells. siRNA against GSTT1 reduced osteogenic differentiation of hADSCs, whereas GSTT1 overexpression enhanced osteogenic differentiation of hADSCs under osteogenic conditions. In this study, GSTT1 transgenic adipose stem cells could be used in regenerative medicine to improve bone differentiation. In addition, the GSTT1 gene has important significance as a marker for selecting adipose stem cells with potential for bone differentiation in the development of a therapeutic agent for bone regeneration cells.
In this study, we developed biocompatible adhesive which enables implanted chondrogenic-enhanced hASCs being strongly fixed to the lesion site of defected cartilage. The bioengineered mussel adhesive protein (MAP) was produced and purified using a bacterial expression system as previously reported. The cell encapsulated coacervate was formulated with two polyelectrolyte, the MAP and 723kDa hyaluronic acid (HA). MAP formed liquid microdroplets with HA and subsequently gelated into microparticles, which is highly viscous and strongly adhesive. The MAP with chondro-induced hASCs were implanted on the osteochondral defect created in the patellar groove/condyle of OA-induced rabbits. Rabbits were allocated to three different groups as follows: Group1 – Fibrin only; Group2 – Fibrin with hASCs (1.5×106 chondro-induced hASCs); Group3; MAP with hASCs. The implanted cells were labeled with a fluorescent dye for in vivo visualization. After 35 days, fluorescent signals were more potently detected for MAP with hASCs group than Fibrin with hASCs group in osteochondral defect model. Moreover, histological assessment showed that MAP with hASCs group had the best healing and covered with hyaline cartilage-like tissue. The staining image shows that MAP with hASCs group were filled with perfectly differentiated chondrocytes. Although Fibrin with hASCs group had better healing than fibrin only group, it was filled with fibrous cartilage which owes its flexibility and toughness. As MAP with hASCs group has higher possibility of differentiating to complete cartilage, Fibrin only group and Fibrin with hASCs group have failed to treat OA by rehabilitating cartilage. In order to clarify the evidence of remaining human cell proving efficacy of newly developed bioadhesive, human nuclear staining was proceeded with sectioned rabbit cartilage tissue. The results explicitly showed MAP with hASCs group have retained more human cells than Fibrin only and Fibrin with hASCs groups. We investigated the waterproof bioadhesive supporting transplanted cells to attach to defect lengthily in harsh environment, which prevents cells from leaked to other region of cartilage. Collectively, the newly developed bio-adhesive, MAP, could be successfully applied in OA treatment as a waterproof bioadhesive with the capability of the strong adhesion to target defect sites.
Cite this article:
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis and causes a significant deterioration in patients’ quality of life. The high prevalence of OA as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs led to a rise in regenerative medicine efforts. The hope is that this will provide a treatment modality with the ability to alter the course of OA via structural modifications of damaged articular cartilage (AC). Regenerative therapy in OA starts with the concept that administered cells may engraft to a lesion site and differentiate into chondrocytes. However, recent studies show that cells, particularly when injected in suspension, rapidly undergo apoptosis after exerting a transient paracrine effect. If the injected stem cells do not lead to structural improvements of a diseased joint, the high cost of cell therapy for OA cannot be justified, particularly when compared with other injection therapeutics such as corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid. Long-term survival of implanted cells that offer prolonged paracrine effects or possible engraftment is essential for a successful cell therapy that will offer durable structural improvements. In this talk, the history and current status of regenerative therapy in OA are summarized along with the conceptual strategy and future directionsfor a successful regenerative therapy that can provide structural modifications in OA.
The high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs for OA, has provided a rationale for regenerative medicine as a possible treatment modality for OA treatment. In this editorial, the current status of regenerative medicine in OA including stem cells, exosomes, and genes is summarized along with the author’s perspectives. Despite a tremendous interest, so far there is very little evidence proving the efficacy of this modality for clinical application. As symptomatic relief is not sufficient to justify the high cost associated with regenerative medicine, definitive structural improvement that would last for years or decades and obviate or delay the need for joint arthroplasty is essential for regenerative medicine to retain a place among OA treatment methods. Cite this article:
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common arthritis. Early OA is treated with pain-relieving medication while advanced diseases are treated with joint replacement. Intraarticular (IA) injection has been also used as a local therapy for OA. Only corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid has been clinically used for IA injection up to now. While these drugs are effective in alleviating pain relief and mitigating inflammation, they do not regenerate damaged cartilage. We have developed drug delivery system for OA treatment using a new molecule kartogenin which are known to have regenerative effects for cartilage. These systems include kartogenin-conjugated chitosan nano/microparticles, thermoresponsive nanospheres containing kartogenin and diclofenac, hyaluronic acid hydrogel containing PEGylated kartogenin micelles. We have found that injection of these systems arrested the progression of OA as well as inhibiting inflammation in surgically-induced OA model in rats. These data will be introduced in this talk.
This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that growth factors can reduce the suppressive effect of titanium particles on MSCs. Cultured human MSCs at passage 3 were challenged with prepared cpTi particles at a concentration of 500 particles/cell along with one of the following growth factors: TGF-beta(1) (10 ng/mL), FGF-2 (10 ng/mL), IGF-I (100 ng/mL), and BMP-6 (50 ng/mL). After various periods of time, the treatment effects on cellular proliferation, viability, and osteogenic differentiation were measured. All the four growth factors positively promoted cell proliferation and viability to a varying extent. FGF-2 most effectively enhanced cell proliferation, whereas IGF-I was the most effective growth factor for enhancing cell viability. FGF-2, IGF-I, and BMP-6 reversed the titanium-mediated suppression of osteogenic differentiation, BMP-6 being the most effective one. Various growth factors can mitigate the suppressive effects of titanium particles on MSCs and enhance cell proliferation, viability, and osteogenic differentiation.
